뉴욕 타임즈에 4대강에 대한 기사가 크게 나갔다고 하는데 국내 언론에 인용 되었다가 사라졌다고 합니다.

[투명소망]

해외 한인 사이트에 올라온 내용입니다.

영문기사내용은 딱히 비판적이라기 보다는 반대하는 사람들과 그들이 반대하는 이유들이 나와있고 이명박의 직업적 배경과 그에서 오는 자신감으로 인한 추진, 정부에서 보는 타당이유와 그로인한 좋은점 등등을 열거해 준 정도입니다.

하긴 기사로 저정도 언급해 줬다면 비판적이란 말을 써도 될 듯은 합니다.

제가 개인적으로 번역까진 무리이겠고 나중에 번역본 올라오면 다시 보충해 놓겠습니다.

이 기사 자체보다는 인용들이 국내포털에 올라 왔다가 사라졌다는 게 문제이겠죠.

[개망신]뉴욕타임즈, "이명박의 4대강 사업은 재앙"

등록일 : 2009.12.16 11:10

12월13일(현지시간), 뉴욕타임스가 이명박정부의 4대강 사업에 비판적인 기사를 대서특필했습니다.  
이 기사는 12월14일일자 A섹션 6면 톱 기사로 나갔습니다. 
내용은 대략 이렇습니다. 
“4대강사업이 반대의 바다를 만났다. 192억불의 예산이 들어가는 한국 정부의 야심찬 4대강 정비사업이 환경의 재앙을 몰고 올 것이라는 우려속에 강한 반대에 부딛쳤다”라고 보도했습니다. 


그런데 이 기사 인용보도가 국내언론에도 실렸었는데, 
포털 뉴스검색에서는 꼴랑 사진 한 장(다음)밖에 검색이 안 된다고 하네요. 
민주당 김진애 의원이 트위터에 그 내용을 올려서, 검색해 보았더니 정말 그러더군요.  
다음에서는 사진이라도 한 장 검색되는데, 네이버는 전무합니다. 
(구글에서는 검색됩니다. 
조선닷컴 ''4대강 프로젝트 해일같은 반대' NY타임스‎'(뉴시스) 기사가 나옵니다.)


4대강 사업에 대한 해외언론의 시각을 알 수 있는 좋은 기사가 가려져 있다는 것은 안타까운 일입니다. 
그래서 뉴욕타임스 원문 기사를 제가 긁어왔습니다. 


(곧 번역본도 올리도록 하겠습니다.
4대강 기사가 포털에서 사라진 경위에 대해서는 한겨레신문 기자분이 파악중이니 곧 경위가 밝혀질 것 같습니다.) 

Ambitious Rivers Project Meets a Sea of Opposition 

CHOE SANG-HUN

Published: December 13, 2009 


NAJU, South Korea — Last month, on a gravelly embankment of the Youngsan River here, President Lee Myung-bak broke ground on a $19.2 billion public works project to remake the country’s four longest rivers, an ambitious and controversial undertaking that has spurred a national debate over what constitutes green development.

Choi Han-gon, 55, a farmer, looked at a billboard that showed a new weir to built on the Youngsan River as part of President Lee Myung-bak’s controversial “Four Major Rivers Restoration Project.”

Yoon Hyo-chang, an engineer with Daerim Industrial Co., explained that President Lee Myung-bak’s “Four Major Rivers Restoration Project” would create a new river front complex in Yeoju, a town on the Han River south of Seoul.

The project will remake the country’s four longest rivers. 

Mr. Lee says the project will generate thousands of jobs, improve water supply and quality, and prevent flooding, while providing a model for environmentally sound development.

But critics call it a political boondoggle, say it will be an environmental disaster and have sued to stop it. More South Koreans oppose the project than support it. And opponents charge that it is simply a repackaging of Mr. Lee’s earlier dream of linking the Han and Nakdong Rivers to create a “Grand Korean Waterway” across the nation, a proposal he abandoned in the face of widespread opposition.

Meanwhile engineers have already begun work to rebuild the Han, Nakdong, Kum and Youngsan Rivers, work that is likely to make Mr. Lee famous or infamous long after his five-year term ends in 2013 and could even determine who succeeds him.

“If they build a weir here, I fear it will trap the water and make the river more polluted than it is now,” said Choi Han-gon, 55, a farmer here who admits to conflicted feelings about the project. Gazing at a government billboard depicting the futuristic waterfront town promised to rise here within two years, he added, “I can also see why everyone will love it once it’s done.”

Mr. Lee, a former chief executive of the Hyundai construction company who is nicknamed the Bulldozer for his penchant for colossal engineering schemes, aims at nothing less than rethinking the ecology and economy of the rivers, some of which were heavily polluted during the country’s rapid industrialization. For three years, workers will dredge river bottoms and build dikes, reservoirs and hydroelectric power stations.

When the work is done, the government says, the rivers will “come alive” with tourists, sailboats and water sports enthusiasts. Sixteen futuristic-looking weirs will straddle the rivers, creating pristine lakes bordered by wetland parks. A 1,050-mile network of bike trails will run along the rivers.

Mr. Lee has engaged in this sort of development before, overcoming similar opposition and ultimately reaping a political fortune. As mayor of Seoul, in 2005, he silenced protests from urban shop owners and peeled back asphalt to reveal a long-forgotten, sewage-filled stream. He cleaned it and let it run again through downtown Seoul by pumping in water from the Han River.

Today, the four-mile Cheonggyecheon River is the capital’s most visible landmark. Its popularity helped win him the presidency in 2007.

Now, with an eye to his legacy, Mr. Lee is determined to repeat that success, this time on a national scale.

He wants the work done fast, in time for the 2012 parliamentary and presidential elections. Although he is constitutionally barred from seeking re-election, his governing Grand National Party bills the river project as the centerpiece of a Green New Deal, a strategy of economic growth through eco-friendly projects.

“As with the restoration of Cheonggyecheon, our efforts to save the four major rivers will generate greater benefits than we can even imagine now,” Mr. Lee told 2,000 guests at the groundbreaking ceremony on the Youngsan River.

The political opposition, however, calls it “quick-fix window-dressing” ahead of the 2012 elections. More than 400 environmental and other civic groups filed a joint lawsuit last month to stop the project. They argue that dredging river bottoms will disrupt the ecosystem and the new dams will create catch basins, worsening pollution and flooding.

“He just broke ground for an environmental catastrophe,” said Woo Sang-ho, spokesman of the main opposition Democratic Party. In Parliament, the opposition is trying to block further financing for the project, while Mr. Lee’s party, the majority, is determined to push it through.

After his decision to allow American beef imports last year was met with huge street protests, Mr. Lee’s approval ratings have begun to bounce back amid signs of economic recovery. Now he is courting a new generation of affluent Koreans who want a greener environment in their neighborhoods, a bet that paid off handsomely in Seoul.

That he chose this southwestern town for the official start of the four rivers project was no accident. The Youngsan River is one of the country’s most polluted, and many in the province support Mr. Lee’s efforts.

But the surrounding Cholla region is a traditional stronghold of the opposition, posing a dilemma for local politicians. At the groundbreaking event, the provincial governor and the mayor of Kwangju, the region’s main city — both members of the Democratic Party — praised the project.

Some of the project’s most avid supporters are those who live near the rivers.

“I have great expectations,” said Choi Hyun-ho, 61, a farmer in Yeoju, a Han River town south of Seoul. “Land prices here have risen 40 percent in the past two years.”

But some locals fear the loss of their traditional way of life.

“Those trucks and bulldozers are slashing the rivers around the country to build a personal monument for an engineering president and his friends: greedy developers and construction companies,” said Kim Jae-sun, 46, a farmer on the Youngsan River. “I don’t foresee any tourists coming here, just garbage from upstream piling up at the new dam, right in front of my village.”

Mr. Kim joined dozens of environmental activists who protested at Mr. Lee’s ceremony.

“You can’t improve water quality by building more dams,” said Park Mi-kyong, a local environmental activist who led the demonstration. “It’s best to let the river flow its natural course.”

Lee Yong-soo, 77, who lives in Mokpo, a town farther downstream, expressed nostalgia for 30 years ago when the water was so clean that children dived for clams and fishing boats sailed up the Youngsan to sell anchovies and skate fish to inland villages. But then the riverbed rose with layers of toxic silt. So he was willing to give the president the benefit of the doubt.

“He cleaned up that ditch in Seoul, didn’t he?” he said. “If he can clean up this river, everyone will applaud him.”

[mumreplenish,,]

맨위로 뜨네요..nytimes로..감사^^