스크랩 영국 프리랜서 라이터 `천안함 증거 어뢰는 가짜`

[강철무지개]

The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied To

Posted on May 24, 2010 by willyloman

by Scott Creighton

"천안함 스모킹건 조작됐다" 英 기자 주장 - 영국의 프리랜서 라이터인 스콧 크레이튼(Scott Creighton)스모킹건인 어뢰 추진부 증거가 날조됐다고 주장했습니다.동 기사를 클릭하시면 설계도와 증거물을 대조하며 스모킹 건이 북한 CHT-02D가 아니라

전혀 다른 어뢰라고 주장하고 있습니다.그리고 이 1번 어뢰 증거에 대해서 조사원들이 사인하지

않았다는 사실도.. 우리나라 언론들은 왜 이런걸 밝혀내지 못할까요?

That’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.

A Perfect Match?

This is the presentation refered to in the paper linked above. They mention that during a presentation of their findings, they showed the schematics of a CHT-02D torpedo in relation to the evidence they found. They claimed in their investigation that these are a “perfect match” and that claim is being repeated endlessly on both sides of the fake political divide. (please click on image for a larger view)

This is by no means a “perfect match”.  No wonder they didn’t want to sign that “investigation” of theirs. (please click on image for a larger view)

 합조단이 발표의 “CHT-02D” 실제 설계도

  합조단에서 건졌다는 1번어뢰

위아래 어래 비교시 4부분에서 설계상 다름 (표시된 A,B,C,D)

There are 4 clear differences in the design of these weapons and on-e is without a doubt, the key to proving these are not the same.

* “A” & “D” ? Here you can clearly see major differences in the design of the hub of the propellers. In the diagram above you can see it has a smaller hub whereas in the evidence below it, the hub is larger.

프로펠러의 hub 모양이 다름(위의 설계도는 작은 허브이고 아래는 크다)

* “B” ? The actual shape of the propellers is very different. You can see a notch in the diagram above that doesn’t exist in the actual evidence propeller below. The overall shape of the blades are vastly different as well, both the front and the rear propeller sets. (프로펠러의 실제형태가 매우 다르다)

All of this might be explained away by suggesting that these propellers were switched out. Thought it might be possible, remember that these are finely tuned and designed systems; on-e just can’t switch these hub designs “willy nilly” like on-e would on their John-Boat. But, that aside, though it may be possible to have put different kinds of propellers on this fish, it is certainly NOT a “perfect match”.

Now, the last point proves they are not the same torpedo.

* “C” - As you can plainly see, the stabilizers (or propulsion system?) in the diagram above are clearly shown IN FRONT of the separation plate as it is lined up in the display with the evidence below. However, the torpedo below houses that same stabilizer (or propulsion system) BEHIND the separation plate (separating the body and the tail section of the torpedo). 

추진체가 위의경우 분리판앞에 보이는데  아래어뢰는 분리판 뒤에 있다

(어뢰의 몸체와 꼬리를 분리하는 면)

This is a major difference that cannot be explained by saying it was some kind of after market modification. This is part of a key design of the workings of these weapons and can not have been changed. This difference clearly indicates these are different weapons altogether.

(there are other differences that have been pointed out to this researcher; “Jan” noticed that the axle shape is tapered on the evidence and straight on the diagram. A good point. There are probably others as well (I noticed a difference in the shape of the “fin” in the guidance section in the back as well…. clearly there is no way to say these are a “perfect match”)

It is no wonder the “investigators” chose not to sign their work.

중략

Conclusion

It is clear that we are being lied to and manipulated into believing that North Korea is behind the sinking of the South Korean vessel, the Cheonan.  It is impossible to draw conclusions at this time as to who is responsible but we can conclude based on the evidence, that the official story is yet another lie being pawned off on the American people. This lie is obvious and could be used to instigate military action against the people of North Korea.

대략 읽어보니 결론은 이렇습니다.

1. 이양반이 지적한 건, 프로펠러사이의 연결부위의 형상과 앞쪽 프로펠러 형상자체,추의 어떤

Shape의 Chamfer형상이 다르다.
2. 또한 국제공조로 수사했다고 하는데, 공인된 조사관에 의해, 누구도 그 내용에 서명하지 않았다.
국제공조로 했기때문에 보고서에는 참여한 국제조사관들이 서명해야 당연하다.
3. 다른 어뢰인지 여부는 정확히 모른다. 따라서 다른 국가의 어뢰들도 설계도로 비교,추가 분석이

 필요하다. (근데, 이사람은 독일제로 추정하는 거 같습니다.)

 

내용의 마지막 부분,

이렇게 '북한에 의한 짓'이라고 '거짓말'을 하는 것은 '북한에 대한 군사적 행동'에 대한

'명분 쌓기'이다.

 

 

 

[발키리]

진실을 알리고자합니다. 퍼감니다.