국제번역통역협회(ITIA) | 아래의 1장 영어를 한글로 번역 견적 부탁합니다. - -

1장 영어를 한글로 번역 견적 부탁합니다. 실지는 1장은 했고, 2장입니다. - 단  샘플번역용으로 사용하며, 가능하신분만 약간 한문장이도 해 보세요.-    제1.장 <STYLE>P{margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:2px;}</STYLE> How close should journalists get to thugs and murderers to get the facts? It’s a question that has troubled editors for a long time, but a question that isn’t asked nearly often enough.   The question takes on new significance in an age of terrorism. We revisit it now that Columbia University has awarded a Pulitzer Prize to an anonymous Associated Press photographer whose connections to terrorists yielded an extraordinary scoop. By the rules, the AP did nothing wrong.   But in a heated exchange with critics who saw the photographs as complicity with terror, an AP spokesman explained that the photographer was “not ’embedded’” with terrorists and did “not have to swear allegiance” to them. This is not very persuasive, but it says something important about the journalistic rules.   The photograph ran in newspapers across the country, including The Washington Times, in December. The director of photography for this newspaper, in fact, acting in his independent capacity, was one of the five judges who recommended awarding the prize.   The photograph was riveting. It depicted the murder of three Iraqi election workers in broad daylight in the middle of Baghdad’s busy Haifa Street.   In it, an unidentified gunman stands unmasked. The slumped body of his first victim lies at his feet. To the right, a soon-to-be dead victim kneels and faces the oncoming traffic.   In a climate of doomsaying about the January elections, the image resonated with American and European critics of the war. The photograph seemed to confirm‎ fears about where the Iraq insurgency was heading.   That, as it turned out, was precisely what the assailants intended. It was no accident that the AP photographer was present to record the act. The assailants had spun him into covering it.   A person at the Associated Press with knowledge of the circumstances explained to Salon, the Internet magazine, that in such a case an unknown informer close to the assailants would have tipped off the AP photographer of an approaching newsworthy event on Haifa Street.   The photographer would not be told that the event was to be an execution. But he would have been told by those close to the attackers that something worth photographing would occur there.   Was the Associated Press guilty of complicity with terrorists the way its critics insist? To be sure, there were plenty of unanswered questions. Foremost was the reason why the AP could not give at least the affiliation of the assailants.