'호주 고위공무원의 비리를 신고하여 호주정부에 18M USD 국고수입을 제공한 공익제보자'의 재산을 강탈하는 호주 정부 '상상을 초월하

[정동희]

'호주 고위공무원의 비리를 신고하여 호주정부에 18M USD 국고수입을 제공한 공익제보자'의 재산을 강탈하는 호주 정부
'상상을 초월하는 호주 정부의 비양심과 이중성'
(오늘 저의 어머니가 이런 글 공개적으로 올린다고 제 글 누가 찾아 읽는다고 착각하지 말고 그 시간 제 살 길을 찾아라고 말씀하시는데, 어제까지 진행된 상황을 보면 그런 거 같습니다. 다만 한국 안에서는 그런 거 같지만 글로벌 측면에서 1%라고 해결 가능성을 높이기 위해 최선을 다하는 차원에서 '여러분은 구경만 하지 마시고, 최소한의 양심을  '호주 고위공무원의 비리를 신고하여 호주정부에 18MUSD 국고수입을 제공한 공익제보자'인 나에게 보이도록 도와주십시오'라는 내용으로 오늘도 호주 각계에 보낸 이메일을 첨부합니다)
몇몇 관련 부서에서 답변이 있었는데 한달 거의 채우며 매일 연락하는데도 불구하고 정작 핵심인 호주 총리/연방 법무장관/서호주 총리는 '호주 고위공무원의 비리를 신고하여 호주정부에 18MUSD 국고수입을 제공한 공익제보자'인 내가 나의 생존자산을 국제법에 반하여 강탈되고 있는데도, 단 한 통도 답변하지 않았다.
Obviously, there is evidence such as remittance fees from the banking supervision bureau last November, (이런 일방적인 호주 정부의 조폭 수준의 분위기이다보니) but like a fraudster, 'the banking bureau의 작년 11월 답변을 받은 내가 이용한 금융기관' are unable to protest against this.
그리고 어제 외국 지인의 도움을 마지막으로 받아 무려 200000usd를 또 Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley와 the banking supervision bureau에게 뜯기고도, '호주 고위공무원의 비리를 신고하여 호주정부에 18MUSD 국고수입을 제공한 공익제보자'의 승소한 민사재판 종결은 여전히 안되고 있다.

The Auz government is robbing ‘public interest informant who provided 18m USD to the Auz government by reporting corruption of high-ranking Auz government officials’. (The unconscionability and duplicity of the Australian government is beyond imagination.)

The Auz government is robbing the property of a ‘public interest informant who provided 18 million USD in treasury income to the Auz government by reporting corruption of high-ranking Auz government officials’.

(The unconscionability and duplicity of the Australian government is beyond imagination.)

I have continued to send 27 emails to Australian Prime Minister / WA PM / Federal Attorney General / humanrights.gov.au etc  since January 23, 2025, when Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley, violated the government's promise that 'This is absolutely final fees' and 'I paid $6,000 in remittance fees and other charges by asking the banking supervision bureau about my trial completion costs in November of last year.

They did not respond to a single letter even though I, a 'public interest informant who provided 18 million USD in treasury income to the Australian government by reporting corruption of high-ranking Australian government officials', was being robbed of my surviving assets in violation of international law.

Obviously, there is evidence such as remittance fees from the banking supervision bureau last November, (given the one-sided, gangster-like atmosphere of the Australian government) but like a fraudster, 'the financial institution I used received the banking bureau's response last November' are unable to protest against this.

And yesterday, a whopping 200,000 USD was stolen from Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley and the banking supervision bureau, but the civil trial in favor of the 'public interest whistleblower who provided 18 million USD in national treasury revenue to the Australian government by reporting corruption by high-ranking Australian government officials' is still not concluded.

Please do not just look on at the 'unconscionability and duplicity of the Australian government beyond imagination', but help me, as a public interest informant who provided 18 million USD in national treasury income to the Australian government by reporting corruption of high-ranking Australian government officials, at least show some conscience.

(※ Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley(Address: 11th Floor, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, WEST PERTH WA 6005 / Telephone: 61 8 6552 6800 / Email:Minister.Quigley@dpc.wa.gov.au)

The fees I have already paid during the course of my trial closing proceedings from November 2024 to Feb 20, 2025 are as follows.

① The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$23,600 for handling the case (Paid on November 22, 2024)

② The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$25,860 for closing the case (Paid on November 22, 2024)

③ US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau (Paid on November 22, 2024)

④ The trial plaintiff paid the trial defendant the exchange rate difference of 258,633 USD. (Paid at 24th Dec 2024)

⑤ The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$12,800 for an execution fee (Payable on December 24, 2024)

⑥ the freezing procedure fee of US$ 189,823 of the Banking Supervision Bureau (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑦ the General Administration of Finance remitted US$ 38,960 to Stamp charge (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑧ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 12,800 US dollars for an execution fee, again (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑨ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 5,780 US dollars for a certificate fee (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑩ pay the late payment fee of 108,570 dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑪ pay an extension fee of 53,800 US dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑫ US$ 62,630 has been included in the reduction of handling fee ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

(still, needs to pay US$ 174,648 before March 7)

The fees I have already paid during the course of my trial closing proceedings from November 2024 to Feb 20, 2025 are as follows.  

① The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$23,600 for handling the case (Paied on November 22, 2024)

② The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$25,860 for closing the case (Paied on November 22, 2024)

③ US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau (Paied on November 22, 2024)

④ The trial plaintiff paid the trial defendant the exchange rate difference of 258,633 USD. (Paied at 24th Dec 2024)

⑤ The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$12,800 for an execution fee (Payable on December 24, 2024)

⑥ the freezing procedure fee of US$ 189,823 of the Banking Supervision Bureau (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑦ the General Administration of Finance remitted US$ 38,960 to Stamp charge (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑧ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 12,800 US dollars for an execution fee, again (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑨ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 5,780 US dollars for a certificate fee (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑩ pay the late payment fee of 108,570 dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑪ pay an extension fee of 53,800 US dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑫ US$ 62,630 has been included in the reduction of handling fee  ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

(still, needs to pay US$ 174,648 before March 7)

ⓐ The Banking supervision bureau's 'The first mistake is the irresponsibility of public power'

My civil trial was decided in June 2024 and I won, but as a foreigner, I had no idea about the Value Added Deposit related to the settlement, and was able to enter the trial settlement proceedings in November 2024.

(Because I, the trial plaintiff, am a foreigner, the Banking Supervision Bureau asked for a 10% value-added business deposit.

If I had known this before the trial, the trial would never have started. I found out about this after the trial, and regretting it was of no use. Afterwards, to meet this demand from the Banking Supervision Bureau, I sold all my assets and my debt increased significantly.)

I asked about the costs related to receiving the settlement in early November 2024, and the banking supervision bureau clearly replied, '6,000 US dollars for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau.'

I quote some of the conversation between me and my agent and teacher regarding this matter.

2024. 11. 8. (Fri)

10:01Mark

The financial department has finished the verification. the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 23,600 US dollars for handling the case, 25,860 US dollars for closing the case, and 6,000 US dollars for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau. There is no other fee, and the full compensation will be collected within 15 working days after handling.

10:02theview 

Please, 23600+25860+6000, i can't 

And I sent the money on November 22, 2024, and I paid my money to the Banking Supervision Bureau on November 25, 2024.

2024. 11. 22. (Fri)

17:49 Mark

I'll help you pay the fee of $6,000 at the Banking Supervision Bureau next Monday.

 2024. 11. 25. (Mon)

11:55 Mark

Good morning, the financial department has paid the fee of $6,000 to the Banking Supervision Bureau.

I paid the fee in advance. And the Banking Supervision Bureau received my money on November 25, 2024 and did not raise any objection, but recently changed its mind.

The Banking supervision bureau's 'double billing of large sums' will be discussed again in ⓓ.

ⓑ The Banking supervision bureau's Second, tyranny of public power (against international law) : ② Enforcing Double Jopardy

 However, due to other schedule delays, on December 27, 2024, the Banking Supervision Bureau violated the international law prohibition of double jeopardy and made a far-fetched attempt to link the trial I was in as a plaintiff to a transaction that occurred when I first used the Australian financial platform in October 2023 because I was not aware of the situation.  In October 23, everything ended when I paid the $58,592 fine, but I, the weakling, had no choice but to go around borrowing money again, which was already difficult, to come up with the $189,823 that the banking bureau demanded. 

ⓒ Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley, Breaking the promise in the government document that this is absolutely the last time to pay

My trust in the Australian government began to waver from that time(=On December 30, in addition to the sudden double jeopardy cost claim), and I asked the Attorney-General of Western Australia, "Is this really the final cost?" out of anxiety about the double jeopardy that violates international law." 

Then, that afternoon, the Attorney-General of Western Australia added two more costs to the inquiry fee and promised in writing that it was "absolutely the final cost." 

The Attorney-General of Western Australia Hon John Quigley and others promised in writing that it was "absolutely final."  If you look at some of the attached documents, it clearly states in the government document that 'The Ministry of Justice gave an absolute promise that ~ the fees were paid within the specified time, this was the last time' and that the document was distributed to The Banking Supervision Bureau (Perth, WA). 

After that, abedi platform, who actually read the document in the same sense as me, responded to my inquiry as follows: 

"Moreover, the Ministry of Justice also promised that this is the last time to pay the expenses and sent an announcement to other government units." 

I was surprised that the 8th fee above was not even in the documents of the Attorney General of Western Australia, so I asked, "Really the last fee?" and the Abedi Platform Leader directly asked this question to the Attorney General of Western Australia.  I sent it, but the Western Australian Department of Justice replied that it was the last fee, and I received the reply, "The platform leader has confirmed it for you, and it is the last fee." 

Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley, did not keep his 'promise in government documents' that made it an undisclosed case, sending me and my parents' entire assets to Australia, sending me to the limit with dangerous debts, and killing my entire family.

ⓓ The Banking supervision bureau suddenly raised 'Huge Double billing' again on January 23, 2025.

As detailed in ⓐ, I contacted the Banking Supervisory Authority before 8 November 2024 regarding ‘my expenses’.

When me, Mark, and Abedi asked the banking bureau about my expenses, they should have responded. At that time, The Banking supervision bureau gave a different answer and paid the fee. Last November, The Banking Supervision Bureau gave me a clear answer: “US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau.”

And on January 6, 25, it remained silent even when "Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley's 'promise in government documents' saying 'this is absolutely last fees'" was clearly distributed to the Banking Supervision Bureau.

And after believing that promise and paying the fees with my life as collateral, the Banking Supervisory Authority suddenly and irresponsibly changed its position from last November and set a deadline for paying a large fee (if it is not done within the deadline, it will take everything away). Threatening to see it as giving up) and saying something different on 23 January 2025 and using violence against the public authorities.

Not only was the 'Banking Supervisory Authority freeze release fee and remittance fee of US$6000' double charged, but the absolute final fee commitment made in writing by the Attorney General of Western Australia on 6 January 2025 was also breached. 

The Australian government promised that much, and just a few days later, on the afternoon of January 23, 2025, they broke the promise in the previous document like an old shoe. 

They even demanded a double inflated remittance fee that I had already paid to the Banking Supervision Bureau (Perth, WA) in November 24, and threatened to make me a beggar if I did not pay by the deadline. This is a 'unilateral abuse of public power' that even scammers would not do to that extent, nor would they do it in Africa, and in Korea, if that happened, the government official would go to jail. 

The absurdity of the Australian Banking Supervision Bureau on January 23, 2025 is a very strange, unilateral abuse of public power that cannot be found in any other OECD country in the world. 

 Therefore, I believe only in the written promise of the Attorney General of Western Australia, 'absolutely final', and I sent my life to Australia as a last resort to borrow money that I could not save by putting my life on the line, so please let me breathe.

'The Western Australian government, including the Attorney-General of Western Australia Hon John Quigley' commits more atrocities than fraud even though it is not fraud.

They wielded public power against me in an unreasonable and unpredictable way, and said that they would go to Perth from Korea and meet me because they were putting me in a complete bankruptcy. 'Even if you come to Perth, the government personnel of the Banking Supervision Bureau will not receive. you.' I just received an answer and I am appealing like this.

The banking supervisory authority in Australia is the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). APRA supervises the overall financial system in Australia, including banking, insurance, and superannuation.

 Please forward the following message to The Banking Supervision Bureau in Perth, WA and to the Attorney General of Western Australia (Hon John Quigley) who has accepted the money by pledging my life to secure the dangerous money by sending it as a 'final payment' in a government document dated 6 January 2025.

 I feel so wronged and am forcing my parents and others into bankruptcy, so I sincerely ask you to forward my following message to The Banking Supervision Bureau (Perth, WA).

<Dear The Banking Supervision Bureau (the Attorney General of Western Australia broke his promise to pay the 'absolutely final costs' in a document dated January 6, 2025, putting me in a state of complete bankruptcy.)>

At this point, when most of the trial has been completed, I would like to ask you to pay the double high bill that the WA Banking Authority is suddenly charging in violation of the government document promise of the last cost in two stages. "ⓐ Use the remaining $50,000 of the Value Added Business Deposit for the withdrawal in February 24 > ⓑ Temporary deposit of the corresponding trial victory money > ⓒ 'And pay the remaining costs'."  (The second solution I propose to the Banking Supervisory Authority is as follows:

Because I am a foreigner, the Banking Supervisory Authority has demanded a 10% value added business deposit.

I contacted the Banking Supervisory Authority on 8 November 2024 regarding the Banking Supervisory Authority fee charge of 23 January 2025 and received a response.

Not only was the 'Banking Supervisory Authority freeze release fee and remittance fee of US$6000' double charged, but the absolute final fee commitment made in writing by the Attorney General of Western Australia on 6 January 2025 was also breached. Therefore, I would like the Banking Supervisory Authority fee charge of 23 January 2025 to be resolved by deducting the value added business deposit I paid in relation to the court victory. In relation to the value added business deposit of the court victory amount, the amount paid here at this time can be deducted from the refund claim.

In response to my request, they keep repeating that 'the compensation amount and the payment amount must be the same'. However, when I opened two dedicated accounts with the Australian financial authorities to receive the money related to the conclusion of this trial, they requested that some of the money be sent first to reduce the risk of sending the money incorrectly, as follows:

'Just now, when the financial department went to the Prudential Supervision Bureau for filing, it was necessary to file two collection addresses to ensure that nothing was lost.  I will send you another remittance address, and you will remit 200 dollars.'

By the same logic, the Banking Supervision Bureau (Perth, WA) continued to abuse its power, causing me to ⓐ receive money against double jeopardy, and ⓑ (the Attorney General of Western Australia, etc. were silent when the government document was distributed, saying 'absolutely final' in writing, and) belatedly, on November 24, they demanded a deadline for receiving the remittance fee that had already been received, and if I did not meet that deadline, they unilaterally turned me into a beggar. This is clearly not my fault.  So, in a situation where I have already become a beggar by believing in your Australian government document promise, please help me this time so that I, the weak person, can realistically pay the money that The Banking Supervision Bureau (Perth, WA) is demanding (just like you did when you received my money) 

"ⓐ Use the remaining $50,000 of the Value Added Business Deposit for the withdrawal in February 24 > ⓑ Temporary deposit of the corresponding trial victory money > ⓒ 'And pay the remaining costs'."  (The second solution I propose to the Banking Supervisory Authority is as follows:

Because I am a foreigner, the Banking Supervisory Authority has demanded a 10% value added business deposit.

I contacted the Banking Supervisory Authority on 8 November 2024 regarding the Banking Supervisory Authority fee charge of 23 January 2025 and received a response.

Not only was the 'Banking Supervisory Authority freeze release fee and remittance fee of US$6000' double charged, but the absolute final fee commitment made in writing by the Attorney General of Western Australia on 6 January 2025 was also breached. Therefore, I would like the Banking Supervisory Authority fee charge of 23 January 2025 to be resolved by deducting the value added business deposit I paid in relation to the court victory. In relation to the value added business deposit of the court victory amount, the amount paid here at this time can be deducted from the refund claim.

Is this my fault?

When I asked about my expenses last November, the banking supervision bureau should have told me.

So, I would like to ask for a way to not refund that much when the court deposit is refunded later.

I trusted the previous written promise and risked my life to send money, so the problem is that I can't get any new money.

So, just as you had me send $200 and $100 to make sure it was correct when I opened my account last fall, I have no choice but to pay the fee in two steps.

First, the only way is to receive a refund of $50,000  (the remaining amount of the value added deposit I paid at the time of withdrawal in February 2024), receive temporary legal compensation equal to the cost, and then pay the remaining costs.

This time, the Attorney General's previous promise was broken, and the banking bureau insisted on a different answer than the one it gave when it asked about my expenses in November of last year, so it is by no means my fault.

So, since the Australian government is primarily at fault, I have no choice other than the second step above.

Don't the Australian Attorney General and others feel sorry for breaking their written promises?

Last November, when me, Mark, and Abedi asked the banking bureau about my expenses, they should have responded. At that time, The banking supervision bureau gave me a different answer and I paid the fee at that time.

But does it make sense for you guys to insist that there is no punishment for breaking a promise and that only I should be equal to the compensation amount?

Just think about the extreme situation of me and my parents, who went bankrupt after believing their promises.

This is the worst situation for me, who risked my life to trust the documents of the previous attorney general.

Now, it is also very much the fault of the banking supervision bureau, which failed to answer correctly when I asked about my expenses last November.

Therefore, the only way to pay this cost in installments is to pay in installments.

(You guys also did that when you received my money.)

Now that the tyranny of public power has driven me to a dangerous cliff where I have broken my promise to a level that is condemned internationally (since the Australian authorities have no right to insist on the logic that the amount of compensation and payment should be the same), I ask that the case be closed by installment payments. please

Zheng, Donghee