가정된 승리 확률이 있는 전략적 참여 결과 모델

[烏鷺路로]

Strategic engagement outcome model with assumed win probabilities

Below is a quantified, probability-based simulation expanding the 3-way comparison (AGI-only vs Human-only vs Hybrid) across four engagement contexts. Percentages represent estimated win probabilities under equal force parity and contemporary EW-capable fleets. Assumptions are stated after the table.

■ Probability table across key engagement contexts

Engagement context	AGI-only win %	Human-only win %	Hybrid win %	Draw/stalemate %
Short war (≤ 48h)	38	24	34	4
Long war (≥ 72h)	36	18	42	4
Electronic warfare focus (comm/jamming/cyber/EMP)	30	26	40	4
Psychological warfare focus (morale/deception/info ops)	26	34	36	4

Sources: Assumptions and synthesis from prior scenario logic; illustrative, not empirical.

■ Assumptions and baselines

  ○ Force parity: Comparable fleet tonnage, logistics, sortie generation, and EW suites.

  ○ EW competence: All sides possess multi-layer EW (SIGINT/ELINT, cyber IOC/defense, LPI/LPD comms, deception).

  ○ AGI capability: Real-time multi-sensor fusion, rapid COA generation, automated cyber defense/recovery; moderate vulnerability to deep EMP/cyber supply-chain compromise.

  ○ Human capability: Strong in creative deception, morale leadership, and improvisation; limited by cognitive bandwidth, fatigue, and report latency.

  ○ Hybrid governance: AGI as operations/analysis backbone; human provides mission command, risk bounding, ROE stewardship, morale management, and creative approval gate.

■ Sensitivity levers that shift probabilities

  ○ EMP resilience:

      - If hybrid adopts hardened, segmented compute with analog fallback, Hybrid win % in EW +4–6; AGI-only −3–5.

  ○ Cyber superiority (zero-day depth):

      - If AGI side gains sustained exploit lead, AGI-only +6–8 in short war/EW, Hybrid −3–4, Human −4–6.

  ○ Morale shock events (loss of flagship, civilian info ops):

      - Human-only +5–7 in psych war, Hybrid +3–5, AGI-only −4–6.

  ○ Logistics attrition (fuel, spares, UAV stock):

      - Hybrid +4–6 in long war due to adaptive rationing + human prioritization; Human-only −3–5.

  ○ Comms denial depth (satcom outage >48h):

      - Hybrid +3–5 via mission command; AGI-only −3–6 if over-networked; Human-only ±0–2.

■ Interpreting draw/stalemate outcomes

  ○ Draws reflect mutual A2/AD saturation, risk-limited ROE, or weather windows that prevent decisive effects. Hybrid’s mission command with AGI-backed timing tends to compress stalemates into favorable windows, explaining its lower draw rate compared to parity expectations.

■ Next-step options

  ○ Parameter sweep: Provide your ranges for EW strength, EMP hardening, cyber depth, logistics endurance, morale/cohesion scores; I’ll generate a Monte Carlo-style table with confidence intervals.

  ○ Operational vignettes:

      - Blue (Hybrid) vs Red (AGI-only) under satellite blackout and contested chokepoint.

      - Blue (Human-only) exploiting deception against Red (AGI-only) with decoy UAV swarms and false EM signatures.

  ○ ROE constraints modeling: Insert legal/ethical thresholds to see how Hybrid’s human gatekeeping shifts engagement timings and civilian-risk penalties.