RTR VII: Fate of Empires - Preview Three

[최하늘]

원문 - http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=191936

미리 말씀드리자면, 어차피 이 모드가 EB도 아니고 고증에 별로 신경쓸 분들이 없다고 믿어 의심치 않는바[...], 유닛 스크린샷만 긁어 왔으니, 정확한 정보를 원하신다면 직접 위의 링크로 가셔서 확인하시길 바랍니다.

Hellenic Unit Preview

As we have seen, at our campaign's start, King Pyrrhos of Epiros plays an important role in the politics of southern Italy. He is not only threatening Rome's sphere of influence but maybe its very survival! While Pyrrhos undoubtedly made use of local troops he did, of course, draw strongly on his Greek roots for manpower. So let's look at some of these Hellenic soldiers and the new units that will represent them in FOE.

Epirote Pezhetairoi (Pikemen - "Foot Companions")

The Pezhetairoi, or Foot Companions, were the formidable line infantry of Epiros, and were modelled on the pikemen of Phillip II and Alexander the Great. The phalanx of Pezhetairoi formed the core of Epirote armies, arrayed in a deep phalanx formation bristling with pikes.

The phalangite was the Macedonian answer to the Greek hoplite, and remained the mainstay of the Hellenic armies for generations. The Graeco-Macedonian phalangite was the soldier of the “Macedonian phalanx”, an infantry formation developed by King Phillip II of Macedonia, and then deployed by his son Alexander the Great to conquer Greece and the Persian Empire. Known as Pezhetairoi, or Foot Companions, to the Macedonian dynasts, the phalangites were also called Pezoi, or “Foot Soldiers”, by the powers of the Hellenistic Period.

Philip II spent much of his youth as a hostage at Thebes, where he studied under the renowned generals Epaminondas and Pelopidas, who were experimenting with deep lines and slanting battlefronts. These reforms greatly influenced Phillip II in his later design of the “Macedonian phalanx”.

An evolution of the traditional hoplite phalanx of the Classical Period, the Macedonian phalanx transformed warfare. The Macedonian phalanx was manned by phalangites armed with a long pike (sarissa), some 18-24 feet long, enabling them to outreach the traditional Greek hoplites and stave off enemy cavalry. The phalangite wore lighter armour, enabling longer endurance and forced marches. In order to wield the sarissa with two hands, the phalangite carried a smaller “Macedonian shield” rather than the larger, heavier apsis or hoplon of the traditional hoplites.

The "Macedonian phalanx" was a slower moving, less flexible formation than the classical hoplite phalanx, relying on a slow inexorable advance rather than the hoplite charge. Phillip II emphasized the importance of training and unit cohesion, enabling them to overwhelm the citizen hoplites of the Greek poleis (city-states). The Macedonian phalanx remained dominant on the battlefields of the Hellenistic Period until they were finally displaced by the Roman Legion.

The phalangites were well drilled so as to enable them to execute complex maneuvers on the battlefield. They fought packed in a close rectangular formation, the basic unit of which was a file of sixteen men, the dekas; sixteen dekades formed a syntagma of 256 men; these, in turn, were organized into brigades – taxeis – comprised of six syntagma for a total of some 1,500 men.

Each phalangite carries as his primary weapon the trademark of the Macedonian phalanx – the sarissa. The sarissa was a double-pointed pike which by the time of the Successors had grown from its original 18 feet to up to 24 feet by 300 BC. The sarissa was so large and heavy that it was wielded with two hands, and so the phalangite carried a small, less concave bronze shield only 2 feet in diameter. This small shield (pelte) lacked a rim, and had an elbow sling, and was suspended over the shoulder with a baldric. At close range the sarissa was of little use, but an intact phalanx was a formidable force, keeping its enemies at bay and capable of an irresistible advance.

The extreme depth of their new phalanx formation (the syntagma) was the strength of the Macedonian system. The pikes of the first five rows of men all projected beyond the front of the formation, so that there were more spearpoints than available targets at any given time, providing a daunting line of attack bristling with pikes. Once engaged with the enemy, the syntagmae were nearly unstoppable as long as their flanks were protected by cavalry. The Macedonians would advance at a steady, unrelenting rate, mowing down attacking cavalry and infantry alike until the battle was won. For close fighting, the phalangite carried a short double-edged sword, the xiphos.

The “Macedonian system” of warfare developed by Philip II and Alexander the Great relied on the phalanx pinning the enemy army in place, so as to enable the heavy cavalry and hypaspists stationed on the right to make a decisive flanking charge. The Macedonian system became the standard military doctrine of the Successors in the Hellenistic Period: the armies of King Pyrrhos of Epiros relied upon securing the services of Graeco-Macedonian phalangites.

Tarentine Leucaspides (Pikemen - "Whiteshields")

The Leucaspides ("Whiteshields") were the citizen infantry of the Greek-Italiot city-state of Tarentum. They were armed and deployed as pikemen, and fought in the "Macedonian style".

Tarentum (Greek Taras) was founded in 725 BC by Greek colonists from Sparta. With a fine harbour and fertile hinterland, the colony prospered, displacing the native Oinotrians and Messapians, and becoming one of the wealthiest cities of Magna Graecia. Yet the constant attacks of the native Oscan tribes – Lucanians and Bruttians – against the Greek cities of Magna Graecia posed a constant threat. The Italiot Greeks found a protector and master in Tarentum and its leader, the Pythagorean statesmen Archytas. Under his able administration, Tarentine ambition, power and influence reached their height. The democratic political system of Tarentum proved stable and militaristic. Tarentum claimed to be the protector of the Hellenic cities of Italy, and dominated the Greek cities of Italy though the Italiote League.

Soon after Archytas retired, Tarentine power began to wither and Tarentum and the Italiote cities were attacked by the Bruttians and Lucanians in the 350s. In desperation Tarentum appealed to their mother city for help: King Archidamnus III of Sparta campaigned in Italy throughout 343 until his death in 338. From 336-331 King Alexander the Molossian, king of Epiros and brother-in-law to King Phillip II of Macedonia, campaigned against the Bruttians and Lucanians, and finally against the Samnites but Tarentum’s prestige suffered when it failed to protect Kroton in 317, when it was besieged by the Bruttians – it was eventually saved by Syracuse. Again in 304 Tarentum called upon Sparta to assist it against the Lucanians and in 303 the Spartan prince Cleonymus responded to this appeal. The attempt by Agathocles of Syracuse between 298-294 BC to establish his own hegemony in Magna Graecia only left several Greek cities destroyed and the remainder further weakened.

In the 280s the waning power of Tarentum came into conflict with the rising power of Rome and in 285 the Greek-Italiot cities of Thurii, Rhegium, Lokri and Kroton emancipated themselves from Tarentine hegemony and accepted Roman garrisons, turning instead to Rome as their protector against the native Oscan tribes. Roman forces led by Gaius Fabricius Lucinius heavily defeated the barbarian Lucanians in 282, whereby the Romans demonstrated both power and a policy of mild treatment of its “allies”. The hegemony of Tarentum in Magna Graecia was in tatters and, to confront Rome, the city of Tarentum appealed to King Pyrrhos of Epiros for assistance.

The citizen levies of Tarentum are believed to have fought with the sarissa and in the Macedonian phalanx. It is likely that the Italiot-Greeks of Taras adopted the sarissa in the time of King Alexander I of Epiros. Alexander I was a contemporary of Alexander the Great, and, like King Pyrrhos, he too had been invited to Italy by the Greek city of Tarentum (Taras) in 334 BC to assist them against encroaching Oscan peoples. Alexander I secured several victories against the Lucani, Brutii and Samnites, and overran Apulia. However, Tarentum withdrew its support for Alexander I, fearing his personal ambition, and he was slain in Italy in 330 BC by the Lucanians.

Greek Hoplitai

The basis of all military power in Greece once revolved around the hoplite. Operating in the close formation known as the phalanx, they were a powerful unit against both cavalry and infantry.

Greek Hoplites had been a feature of warfare since the 7th Century BC and their weapons remained essentially unchanged. The principal weapon was the thrusting spear (dory), eight to nine feet long, with an ash or cornel wood shaft, iron head, and an iron or bronze buttspike. The centre of the shaft was bound with cord for a secure grip. The spear was usually used in an over arm thrust, but it could also be thrust underarm or even thrown. The secondary weapon of the hoplite was the sword, about 60 cm long.

The “Argive” shield (called aspis or hoplon) was large, 80 cm-1 meter in diameter, convex, made of wood covered with a thin bronze sheet, and was carried with two handles, a bronze porpax in the centre through which the forearm passes, and a cord antilabe at the rim. Hoplites commonly wore greaves, clipped around the legs by their own elasticity, and bronze helmets with cheek-pieces and horsehair crests. Over the Greek woollen tunic, chiton, the hoplite also wore a non-metallic corselet. The heavier and more expensive iron cuirass had increasingly disappeared since the 5th Century BC, as hoplites sought to be swifter and more flexible on the battlefield. In addition, as hoplites were required to equip themselves, cheaper armour grew more popular. The linen corselet – the linothorax – wrapped around the body, tying under the left arm and was split below the waist into strips called pteruges (feathers) for ease of movement.

Hoplites formed up into a formation on a frontage of about 3 feet per man, with each man’s right protected by his neighbour's projecting shield. Hoplites most commonly fought in multiples of four ranks deep, usually eight, though 4, 12 and 16 was also common. In this formation, the hoplites found mutual protection from an accumulation of shields to their front, rear and side. Normally a phalanx of hoplites would advance directly for their enemy, breaking into a run for the last few yards, seeking to close as fast as possible to minimise missile casualties. Ancient Greek battles were a terrible collision of hoplites on the run. What followed this initial collision was the push, or othismos, as ranks to the rear put their bodies into the hollows of their shields and forced those ahead constantly forwards. The hoplite phalanx was vulnerable to flanking attacks, and if the hoplite formation was dispersed or broken then the hoplites are at a great disadvantage. If surrounded or vulnerable to surprise attacks, hoplites would form a hollow square, with baggage, camp-followers and light troops in the centre.

While hoplite arms and armour was burdensome, poorly suited to the summer climate, and uncomfortable, the hoplite panoply accomplished one crucial task: it gave thirty minutes or more of relative protection in which a fighter could close with his enemy and strike savagely with the spear. Hoplite armour was often offensive rather than purely defensive: it was designed to allow a hoplite a chance to carve out a path for those behind him in the phalanx. At times men literally bashed each other with the “defensive” armour of shield, helmet and corselet as those to the rear pushed these human “rams” inexorably onward.

Hoplites were formed from among the citizens of a polis, as a part-time volunteer militia, and so did not receive wages. For this reason, Greek military campaigns were traditionally short and largely confined to the summer. Unlike mercenary hoplites, the citizen phalanx was comprised of men of all ages, from the young to men in their 50s and even 60s. While this strengthened the formation, steadying it with veterans, it also impacted upon the unit’s speed and endurance. The traditional Greek conflict involved hoplite armies moving directly to their target, and seeking a decisive set piece battle. Yet this form of war craft vanished after the Peloponnesian War, being replaced by longer campaigns, requiring larger armies, and with an ever-greater reliance on specialist peltasts, light infantry and mercenaries. Finally, hoplites found themselves outclassed by the spread of the “Macedonian phalanx”, which was deeper and used the longer sarissa rather than the spear. Hoplite equipment became lighter, and hoplites more flexible, but nonetheless traditional hoplite warfare was in inexorable decline during the Hellenistic Period. Despite this, the Macedonian phalanx was relatively slow to spread to mainland Greece, Sicily and Magna Graecia, where hoplite equipment endured until well into the first century BC.

Thureophoroi (Light Infantry)

The Thureophoroi were flexible light infantry, adept as skirmishers and ambushers, but also able to form a tighter formation and serve in the main battle line.

Thureophoroi were rated among the light troops, the "euzoni", and were used as skirmishers, steadily eclipsing the peltasts in the Hellenistic Period. They were used to support skirmishers, to protect the vulnerable flanks of the heavy phalanx formation, and to screen heavier troops in difficult country or on the march. The Thureophoroi were an “intermediate” class of soldier, ranked between the heavy phalanx and the lighter skirmishers. Though capable of fighting hand-to-hand with other light infantry, they could not long stand up to a pike-phalanx.

Thureophoroi carried the oval thureos, from which they derived their name. The thureos was modeled on the standard Keltoi (Galatian) shield, which the Greeks encountered in 280-275 BC, and which became popular thereafter in the third century among the Greeks and Illyrians, called in Greek the "thureos". The shield is painted white, with a spined boss and central handgrip.

Over a simple tunic, the Epirote Thureophoroi wore an iron cuirass, with pteruges ('feathers'), as well as a simple red-brown short cloak. Their other protection was the Macedonian helmet, with a short horsehair crest.

Their principal weapon was the javelin, and they went into battle with a bundle of these. The secondary weapon of the Thureophoroi was the sword.

The Epirote tribes of north-western Greece inhabited a region where classical hoplite warfare had always been limited because of the mountainous terrain, and peltasts were common. The Epirotes adopted the weapons and fighting style of the Thureophoroi with enthusiasm. A further stimulus were the campaigns of King Pyrrhos of Epiros in Italy and Sicily (280-275 BC), where the Epirotes encountered the maniple-style warfare of the native Romans and Oscans. Pyrrhos sought to develop an "articulated" version of the Macedonian Phalanx, whereby the main battle line was comprised of alternate units of phalangites and the more flexible maniples of swordsmen. In this manner, Pyrrhos sought to develop a more flexible battle line against the Romans.

Misthrophoroi Kretikoi Toxotai (Cretan Archers)

By far the most famous of Greek archers, the Cretan Archers (Misthrophoroi Kretikoi Toxotai) were renowned as specialist mercenaries throughout Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean from at the eighth century BC. The political instability and endemic warfare of Crete meant a steady supply of Cretans available for mercenary service overseas. Cretans were notorious pirates and raiders, and so the Cretan Archers specialised in ruses and ambushes, and were highly valued for their mobility and endurance.

Wearing only a simple white tunic, the chiton, and hardy boots, the Cretan Archer was only lightly armoured, with a bronze helmet, of common Hellenistic type, with a small visor, a metal fin-like crest, volutes, a minimal neck-guard, and cheek peices, together with a small, bronze boss-less round shield, the peltai, strapped to the forearm so as to enable both arms to be free to work the bow.

The small round shields were a distinctive feature of the Cretan Archers (Xen. An. 5.2.28-32). The Cretans used a composite bow, and Cretan archery was different to that which prevailed elsewhere in Greece. Because the Cretan archers drew their bowstring to their ear, in contrast to the Greek archers, who only drew theirs to their chest, they were able to achieve higher trajectories and thus had greater range than their Greek counterparts.

Cretans used the composite bow, a bow of an “eastern” or “Scythian” type, able to fire quickly and powerfully; arrows were made of reed, and the arrowheads were large and heavy, with 4.25 inch bronze heads, often barbed. While Persian archers were able to out-range Cretans, because of their lighter and longer arrows, Cretan archers were nonetheless preferred because they were also able to engage in close combat. Carrying a short sword and small round shield (very unusual for archers), unlike typical Greek archers, the Cretans were able to engage in hand-to-hand combat armed with shield and sword, and thereby outclass enemy archers, slingers and light troops.

Cretan cities encouraged the recruitment of their people as mercenaries overseas, reaching treaties with foreign rulers to facilitate the activities of mercenary recruiters. These archers were recruited not only from among the Doric citizens, the dominant oligarchy on the island, but also from the inferior and servile classes of the Cretan cities also. Indeed, the emancipation and enfranchisement of slaves in Crete, to augment the citizen body, and provide additional recruits for military service, led to the class of person known in the sources as ‘Neocretan’ (Stylianos Spyridakis, ‘Cretans and Neocretans’, The Classical Journal, Vol. 72, No. 4, Apr-May 1977, pp. 299-307).

Cretan archers featured widely as mercenary troops, appearing throughout the central and eastern Mediterranean. Cretans were employed by Alexander the Great and the Successors in Asia, by Rhodes and the poleis in Greece to augment the hoplite infantry armies, and even by the tyrants of Syracuse. In 218 BC Hiero II of Syracuse sent a contingent of 500 Cretan archers to assist Rome in the aftermath of the Roman defeat at Trebia (Polybius, 3.75.7). It was a contingent of 600 Cretan archers that were instrumental in installing a pro-Carthaginian regime in Syracuse in 213 BC (Livy, 24.30). The Achaean League, Aitolian League and Antigonids all employed Cretan archers in their wars in Greece, as did Pergumum and Mithridates V of Pontus.

Psiloi

The Psiloi were recruited from both the poorer, hilly areas of Greece, such as Aetolia & Akarnania, the poorer classes of the more advanced Greek poleis, and sometimes the servants of the Greek hoplites.

These men lacked any specialist training, and were armed only with the simplest missile weapons, such as javelins, rocks and even sticks. They were used in foraging, ambushes, the pursuit of broken enemy, and the plundering and ravaging of enemy lands. On the battlefield, they provided the hoplites with a screen, and often open the battle by attacking other light-armed troops. The Psiloi were unable to combat unbroken infantry or cavalry.

The Psiloi normally wore the everyday dress of Greek farmers and shepherds: a woollen, undyed tunic, and simple boots. Sometimes they wore the shaggy felt hats typical of Greek shepherds. They had neither helmet nor shield and, so, relied entirely upon distance and speed to avoid both enemy missiles and hand-to-hand fighting. The Psiloi carried a long knife as a secondary weapon for when they are forced to engage in close fighting.

The Psiloi harassed enemy skirmishers and the flanks and rear of enemy infantry formations.

Misthrophoroi Peltastai

These highly valued skirmishers were better equipped for close combat than psiloi, and so were used in ambushes or to drive off skirmishers. Peltasts could be used to support cavalry against superior enemy horse, to to protect the flanks and rear of the hoplite phalanx.

Peltasts were professional, lightly-equipped, infantry, who were nonetheless better armed that the ordinary skirmishers recruited from among the poorer classes of the Greek poleis, and they emerged as the characteristic mercenary infantry of the fourth century BC Greek armies. While hoplites were highly sought after mercenaries for foreign paymasters overseas, in Greece itself specialist troops like Peltasts were greatly prized by the city-states. Regions such as Achaea and Aitolia, mountainous and poor, were well known for their peltasts, men who were skilled with the javelin from boyhood.

This style of fighting had first emerged in Thrace, from where the first “peltasts” were hired as foreign mercenaries, and hence the “peltast” took his name from the pelte, the characteristic Thracian light shield. Greeks themselves soon adopted this style of combat: the pelte itself had disappeared by the Hellenistic Period, replaced by a stronger round shield, but nonetheless the name endured. The Peltasts were far more effective skirmishers than the Greek Psiloi because they were equipped with a small shield, and so were less vulnerable to defensive barrages of javelins and arrows.

The Athenian Iphikrates won his greatest victory against Sparta, at the battle of Lechaeum (391 BC), defeating the Spartan hoplites with his peltast’s javelin fire. Iphikrates re-equipped peltasts with swords, and improved their performance so that they were able to serve as both skirmishers and engage in hand-to-hand combat as part of the battle-line. While the role of peltasts was increasingly overtaken by thuerophoroi in the Hellenistic Period, nonetheless they endured among the poleis of central and southern Greece, and among the traditionalist Greek poleis of Sicily and Magna Graecia.

The peltast wore an Attic helmet and carried a small, round shield with a thin bronze layer. His boots were iphikratatides, light and easy to untie, said to have been introduced by Iphikrates. The principal weapon of the Peltast is the javelin, and he was armed with a bundle of these, which he was able to throw with great force and accuracy, aided by a javelin thong. This thong was fixed onto the javelin with a temporary hitch knot, and formed a loop which was hooked round the index finger; it fell off the javelin when it was thrown, and was retained in the hand. The Peltast was also equipped with a sword as his secondary weapon, for use in close combat.

Hippeis

The Hippeis were well regarded heavy shock cavalry who rode in close order and used the lance (xyston) against both enemy cavalry and infantry.

While Greek city-states in central and southern Greece had been weak in cavalry during the Classical Period (unlike the Thessalians and Boeotians), cavalry played a much more important role in Greek warfare in the Hellenistic Period. Phillip II and Alexander the Great of Macedon had established armoured cavalry as the new force in battle, using large squadrons of heavy cavalry to break the enemy line. So, while Greek infantry wore lighter armour in the Hellenistic Period, cavalry became ever heavier, and greater numbers of cavalry were fielded than previously. The cavalry tradition was particularly strong in Sicily, where conditions were right for the raising of horses in its fertile plains, and cavalry formed an important part of the armed forces of the large and wealthy Greek city-states on the island.

The Hippeus (Greek: ἱππεύς) was the second highest of the four Athenian social classes, made of men who could afford to maintain a war horse in the service of the polis. From this origin, the heavy cavalry of the Greek city-states became known as "Hippeis". The Hippeis were generally recruited from among the social elites of the Greek poleis: from among those citizens wealthy enough to afford their own mounts and expensive armour.

These cavalrymen wore tall boots, originally of a Thracian style, then popular with Greek cavalry. Greaves seem never to have been worn, as they would have interfered too much on the horseman's grip on his mount. The hippeis also wore a simple woollen tunic and a red cloak. The body armour was a bronze muscled cuirass, which distributed the weight equally – important for a man trying to keep in the saddle. The cuirass was made so that the wearer could ride a horse - either by being made with a wide flange at the bottom or by being short and ending at the waist. The helmet was of the Boiotian type, made of bronze, and worn with a trailing crest. This helmet was popular among Greek horsemen as it provided all-round vision as well as good protection.

These were heavy cavalry, who fought in close order, trained to deliver a controlled, shock charge and fight in close combat. The Hippeis were shield-less, and fought with a lance, the xyston (sometimes called a dory), some 7-10 feet long, with a bronze butt-spike. The xyston was able to be used as a thrusting weapon with two hands, yet was also light enough to be manipulated with one hand in close combat, when a hippeis needed to strike to his rear and flanks. When the xyston broke, the rider sometimes used the butt-spike as a weapon. The Greek cavalrymen typically tried to strike the enemy riders in the face and chest with the lance. The Hippeis’ secondary weapon was the sword, called the kopis or machaera, some 20 inches long, heavier towards the point and curved, able to provide a murderous downward cut.

The Greek horses were smaller than other mounts, and were regarded as inferior to the horses of Persia and Libya. Hippeis often rode their horses with only saddlecloths and a simple saddle-pad, controlling the horse with bridle, reins and with their legs.

Prodromoi

The Prodromoi or ‘scouts’ were a generic type of cavalry, commonly found throughout the Greek world: armed as mounted javelin men, they took on the roles of scouts and couriers in the armies of the Greek city-states.

By the first half of the fourth century BC the Prodromoi wore no body armour, wearing a tunic only, together with the popular crestless Boiotian helmet, which replaced the petasos hat from c. 362 BC. The Boiotian helmet resembles a hat with the brim folded down, made in bronze, and was widely used throughout Athens, Boiotia, Thessaly, Macedon and Ptolemaic Egypt. Their principal weapon was the javelin, consistent with the fact that the chief role of these cavalry was the harassment of the enemy when encountered on march, the screening the deployment of one’s own forces, and the pursuit of routing enemy troops: the javelins were some 6 feet long. Xenophon recommended the Persian cornel-wood palta. While they did not carry shields they were also armed with a straight, Greek-style sword for hand-to-hand fighting.

Alexander the Great keenly used Prodromoi in his campaigns, recruiting them widely from among his Macedonian and Greek subjects, as well as from among Thracians and Paeonians: using them on special assignments as elite troops. In his major battles they featured, leading the attack on the right-wing. Indeed, at the battle of the Granicus in 331 BC the Prodromoi were among those troops that initiated the battle. Their function as advance forces in battle was to absorb the momentum of the enemy charge and allow Alexander to counter charge with fresher troops (Arrian, Anab. 1.14.6; CE 42). These forces also drew volleys of javelins upon themselves, and were able to keep numerically superior enemy cavalry occupied.

At the battle of Issus. the Prodromoi were again posted in front of the cavalry of the line and were also important as scouts for Alexander on the eve of Gaugamela (Arrian. Anab. 1.15.1-5; 3.7.7-8.2), as well as the subsequent pursuit of Darius (Arrian. Anab. 3.18.1; 1.21.2). Although Alexander obviously made excellent use of Prodromoi as mounted skirmishers, they are reported as early as 390 BC in Athens. There, in contrast to the Hippeis, the prodromoi were recruited from among the Thetes, the lowest socio-economic class (Xen Cav. Cmdr. 1.25).

---------------------------------------------------------

어, 음, 본래는 긁어올 생각이 없었는데, 프리뷰에서 보니 팔랑크스 유닛 에니메이션에 개선이 있는것 같아서 혹시나 하는 마음에 긁어왔습니다. 아니, 다시 보니 그딴거 없는거 같기도 하고 말입니다[...]

[입닥제국]

EB처럼 사리사 장창 경우 양손으로 잡게 되었군요.

[최하늘]

처음 봤을때는 eb모드에서 처리를 안한 부분에서도 양손으로 잡는것 처럼 보였는데, 이제는 아닌거 같습니다[...] 어쩌겠습니까, eb2나 기다려야지...

[입닥제국]

넵. 양손으로 "잡는 것처럼 보이죠" ㅜㅜ

[완두콩제리]

오 스킨 이쁘다..

[Daum Bark]

이거 지금 나온 모드인가요?

[최하늘]

아뇨, 제목에서 보셨다시피 '프리뷰'만 공개한 상태이고 지금 작업중이라네요.