[cap.4] DJ 이재훈 쌤의 편입문법타파 - 회원문법질문 1:1 응답음원파일

[[운영]편입사랑]

DJ재훈쌤일대일문답해설4.hwp.hwp

DJ재훈쌤편한도방송4.alz

DJ재훈쌤편한도방송4.a00

DJ재훈쌤편한도방송4.a01   -> 옆의 5개 파일을 모두 다운 받으셔서 압축을 푸셔야 mp3 파일이 나옵니다.

DJ재훈쌤편한도방송4.a02

DJ재훈쌤편한도방송4.a03

*.첨부파일을 다운받아 자료와 함께 보시는 것이 더 좋습니다.^^

질문 1.

닉네임 요리보고

John sat the heavy box of books down and looked around for his brother's car.

sat >> set 이렇게 고쳐야 하구요.

저는 박스 위에 앉았다고 생각을 해서..

seated himself 로 바꿨거든요;

해설: seated himself 로 바꾸려면 뒤에 전치사 on 이 필요합니다. 그러나 이럴 경우 뒤에 나오는 부사 down과는 의미적으로나 형태적으로 호응관계를 맺을 수 없습니다. sat 을 set 으로 바꾸어 set down(내려 놓다)의 형태와 의미관계를 맞추어야 합니다^^

질문 2.

닉네임 문법시러

written languages originate only in large, complex societies that have a great deal of information that needs to store

해설: 수식을 받는 information이 저장되는 수동의 의미이므로 be stored 혹은 storing이 옳습니다. a * need, want, require, deserve 는 능동의 동명사형태로 수동의 의미를 갖습니다.

ex. The problem deserves to be solved. = The problem deserves solving.

(그 문제는 풀어볼만한 가치가 있다.)

질문3.

닉네임 나를위한도전

강의 빠짐없이 잘 듣고 있습니다..^^

묶어놓고 보니깐 이제 꽤 두껍더라구요..

독학생이여서 문제를 풀다가 모르는 부분을 해결 할 수가 없어서 힘들어요

독해문제인데요...문법시간에 이런질문드려도 되는지 모르겠네요...^^;;;

It began to seem that one would have to hold in the mind forever two ideas which seemed to be in opposition.

The first idea was acceptance of life as it is,and men as they are,in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace.

But this did not mean that one could be complacent, for the second idea was of equal power;that one must never accept this injustice as commonplace but must fight them with all one's strength.

According to the passage, how are the "two ideas" relatied?

1..they are incompatible (종*,강** 답)

2..One changes into the other

3..they are mutually constitutive (김* 답)

4..One is reinforced by the other

제 생각에는 앞 It began to seem that~~에서 지금까지 이어온 과거의 잘못된 통념을 말하고 있다고 생각했어요. 그래서 이 둘의 관계는 서로 상호보완적인 관계라서 생각했는데 종* 강**의 답과는 정반대에요..ㅠㅠ

김*의 해설

두생각은 각각 혼자만으로는 온전한 성립이 불가능하고 서로 나머지 생각에 가담하여 그 성립을 가능하게 해주는 관계에 있다

종*의해설

보기 2번3번4번이 같은맥락;;그래서 1번;;

two ideas which seemed to be in opposition.부분에서 1번으로 더 확고해진다라고 설명하셨어요...

강**의 해설

for the second idea was of equal power에서

equal power이부분에서 1번정답으로 할 수 있는 단서라고 하셨습니다..

너무 길어졌네요..ㅠㅠ

앞으로도 열강 부탁드릴께요^^

====================================================================

It began to seem that one would have to hold in the mind forever two ideas which seemed to be in opposition.

The first idea was acceptance of life as it is, and men as they are, in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace.

But this did not mean that one could be complacent, for the second idea was of equal power; that one must never accept this injustice as commonplace but must fight them with all one's strength.

According to the passage, how are the "two ideas" related?

1..they are incompatible

2..One changes into the other

3..they are mutually constitutive

4..One is reinforced by the other

제 생각에는 앞 It began to seem that~~에서 지금까지 이어온 과거의 잘못된 통념을 말하고 있다고 생각했어요. 그래서 이 둘의 관계는 서로 상호보완적인 관계라서 생각했는데 종* 강**의 답과는 정반대에요..ㅠㅠ

김*의 해설

두생각은 각각 혼자만으로는 온전한 성립이 불가능하고 서로 나머지 생각에 가담하여 그 성립을 가능하게 해주는 관계에 있다

종*의해설

보기 2번3번4번이 같은맥락;;그래서 1번;;

two ideas which seemed to be in opposition.부분에서 1번으로 더 확고해진다라고 설명하셨어요...

강**의 해설

for the second idea was of equal power에서

equal power이부분에서 1번정답으로 할 수 있는 단서라고 하셨습니다..

해설: 원문 발췌

에세이 설명:

The last passage from an essay in James Baldwin's "Notes of a Native Son. The author begins the essay in 1943 with an account of driving to his father's funeral through what he calls a "wilderness of smashed plate glass". He then deftly walks us through the history of Harlem race riots, while at the same time, attempts to come to grips with his own experience of being alienated from both his father and his country. By the end of the essay, he emerges victorious over both the bitterness that engulfed his father's life and the racial hatred that threatens his own. "hatred, which could destroy so much, never failed to destroy the man who hated..." He then concludes with this passage: "It began to seem that one would have to hold in mind two ideas which seemed to be in opposition. The first idea was acceptance, the acceptance totally without rancor, of life as it is, and men as they are: in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace. But this did not mean that one could be complacent, for the second idea was of equal power: that one must never in one's own life accept these injustices as commonplace but must fight them with all one's strength.

It began to seem that one would have to hold in the mind forever two ideas which seemed to be in opposition.

The first idea was acceptance of life as it is, and men as they are, in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace.

중략 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

He puts forth the idea that "the wilderness is an antidote for the alienation experienced by urban people" It reminds me that a wilderness is not a national park or a protected space but a place completely wild and hostile that has a healing effect. [Theresa]

세계 감리교 연합총회 후의 코멘트:

How do we stay centered in the peace of Christ in the midst of activism? The work of advocating for justice within an institution is messy and draining. It requires that we speak our truths—truths that directly conflict with the Truth as others perceive it. It requires relentless effort and lots of time and a faith that’s sometimes difficult to sustain. People can be so mean! Political bodies are so unwieldy! It’s too easy to grow resentful or despairing and forget our foundation in love.

Whenever I struggle with this balance, I consider an essay by James Baldwin called “Notes of a Native Son.” In it he describes the Harlem race riots of the early 1940s and the stinging racial bitterness he inherited from his father. The essay closes with these words: “ It began to seem that one would have to hold in the mind forever two ideas which seemed to be in opposition. The first idea was acceptance, the acceptance totally without rancor, of life as it is, and men as they are: in the light of this idea, it goes without saying that injustice is a commonplace. But this did not mean that one could be complacent, for the second idea was of equal power: that one must never, in one’s own life, accept these injustices as commonplace but must fight them with all one’s strength.”

I imagine James Baldwin with his arms outstretched, holding his fierce commitment to justice in one hand and an incomprehensible acceptance of and love for humanity in the other. What a balancing act! But this is precisely the paradox Jesus embodied. The reign of God is already here, and we must work like mad to bring it about. When we tip toward complacency, we need a good dose of reality to get us on our feet, protesting. When we tip toward burn-out or bitterness, we need a generous heart and the reminder of Christ’s abiding love, even here, even now. May love guide, measure, and sustain our work today.

Elizabeth Jarrett Andrew

Minneapolis, MN

해설: 불의한 세상을 그대로 받아들이자는 것과 그러한 불의와 맞서 싸워야 하는 것은 이 세상에 같이 존재할 수 없다가 아니라(즉 incompatible)이 아니라 어쩔 수 없이 받아들여야 하는 양립성을 갖고 있다는 것(mutually constitutive) 즉, competitive co-existence (경쟁적 공존)이라 할 수 있습니다. 선생님이 제시한 황야의 비유를 참조하길... 뭐랄까 황야를 놓고서는 이런 표현이 떠오르네요. Duality of mind(마음의 이중성)라고나 할까...요^^

답은 3번입니다*^^*

[[운영]편입사랑]

질문주신분들 모두 확인하시고 잘 들어주세요...^^ 마지막 기출독해부분때문에 이재훈 쌤께서 많은 고생을 하셨습니다. 응원 많이 해주세요~~! 바쁘신 와중에 짬내시어 편한도를 위해 mp3강의를 해주시고 계십니다.^^

[나를위한도전]

정말 감사드려요...독해문제 너무 궁금했는데 감사드려요..^^선생님 사랑합니다..ㅋㅋ

[나루vs]

항상 고먑습네다~~!!!!ㅎㅎ

[~~~~~]

이재훈선생님 항상 훌륭한 강의 감사합니다.

[shabang]

정말 요즘 이재훈 선생님 때문에 마음 바로잡으며 공부하고 있습니다. 무소 처럼 가라는 말씀, 정말 와닿습니다. 질문에 대한 정성스런 답변 감사드리고요~꼭 뵙고 싶습니다.감사합니다.~~

[편입공부는이제끝]

마지막 독해 후덜덜하네염..이재훈쌤~ 열정 대단하십니다 ^^ 강의 감사드려욧! 저런어려운독해를 문제로내다니ㅠ.ㅠ