How to Reduce the Pay Gap Between Men and
Women
Massachusetts now mandates that employers
offer prospective
employees a compensation figure without asking what that
applicant
made at a previous job, to keep from perpetuating the
disparately low wages that
plague
women and minorities. New York City
is considering a similar bill. But the causes of
pay inequity are complex. Are
these measures a step in the right
direction? What else can be done to ensure women receive equal
pay for equal work?
* pay gap = 임금 격차/ mandate =
명령[지시]하다/ prospective employee = 채용 후보자/ applicant = 지원자/ perpetuate = 영구화하다,
영속시키다/ disparately = 본질적으로 다르게, 유사점이 없이/ plague = (한동안 고통・문제로) 괴롭히다; (요구・부탁 등으로)
성가시게 하다/ minority = (한 사회・국가 내의) 소수집단/ bill = (국회에 제출된) 법안/ inequity = 불공평/ step
= (어떤 목표를 달성하기 위한) 움직임[걸음/조치]/ ensure = 반드시 …하게[이게] 하다, 보장하다
여성들이 같은 일에
대한 동일한 임금을 받는 것을 보장하기 위해서 할 수 있는 것은 무엇인가요?
1.
Women Need Equal Opportunities for Job Advancement
Men still
get better jobs that lead to more promotion opportunities.
2. Salary Transparency Is Key
In many public
sector settings, wage gaps between men and women tend to be lower because there
is more pay transparency.
3. Salary
Negotiations Often Keep Women from Equal Pay
As long as
employers are allowed to pay unequal wages because men negotiated for more, we
will not completely eradicate the pay gap.
4. Jobs Associated with Women Are Lower
Paid
Two thirds of all minimum wage workers are women, and
many minimum wage jobs are held by women of color.
Sample
Essay
Salary Transparency
Is Key to Narrowing Gender Pay Disparities
Similar to a
provision in the Massachusetts new law, California recently passed legislation
that prohibits employers from penalizing workers who discuss wages and salaries.
(Massachusetts goes further by also restricting employers from asking about new
hires’ salary histories.)
These laws are useful in helping to erode the
norm against discussing wages and salaries. Sapping the strength of this
longstanding cultural prohibition could empower women and racial and ethnic
minority workers to speak out against unfair pay practices, and potentially
reduce stubborn pay gaps.
I say potentially because the actual impact of
these laws will depend on their enforcement, and just as important, on education
campaigns to let workers know these laws are on the books. After all, policies
that prohibit workers from discussing their pay with colleagues have been
illegal for over 80 years. And yet we know from a recent survey that nearly half
of the workforce remains subject to this type of speech restriction.
Similarly, banning the use of salary histories in setting pay will
matter only if workers and hiring managers are aware of Massachusetts' new
law.
And, like other recent legislation, Massachusetts's does not mandate
salary transparency — which could be a big step toward eliminating the pay gap.
It aims only to prevent employers from penalizing workers who discuss wages and
salaries. There is a huge gulf between pay transparency — like we see in many
public sector settings, where wage gaps between men and women tend to be lower —
and these recent policies to help narrow gender pay disparities.
After
all, allowing workers to discuss pay will reduce disparities only if underpaid
workers actually have these conversations, and then demand a raise, and their
bosses meet their demands.