흥미돋 여성경찰관은 쓸모없을까?(여성경찰관은 아동, 여성 대상으로만 필요한 것일까? 여자니까 치안에는 조또 필요없을까?)

[for that moment]

2011.6.20이후 적용 자세한사항은 공지확인하시라예

출처: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/07/02/how-more-female-police-officers-would-help-stop-police-brutality/?utm_term=.5dd157b7ac58

내가 이 걸 왜 찾았냐면

보임????

난 경기도 사람인데

경기도가 얼마나 큰 도시인데 경기도 다 합쳐서 20명밖에 안뽑음.

심지어 이 카페 내에서도 수 많은 기사에서도 성범죄 피해자, 가정폭력(피해자 대부분 여성,아동)에 대한

남경찰의 반응이 문제가 된적도 많음.

뿐만아니라 우리나라는

여성피해자가 압도적으로 많은나라야

1. 강도, 살인, 강간, 폭력 등 흉악범죄 피해자 10명 중 8명은 여성.

2. 살인 피해자 중 50%는 여성. g20 국가중에 여성 살인 피해자가 더 많은 국가는 단 한 곳도 없음. 

심지어 여성이 인권이 낮다는 인도, 사우디 아라비아도 여성 피해자는 30% 정도.

(출처http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/07/22/2013072202416.html)

근데 여성경찰을 저렇게 적게 뽑는게 말이 안된다고 생각해

(여성의 일자리 문제를 떠나서 시민으로써 여성으로써 너무 불안함)

주요한 것만 번역해왔음( 전문 다읽어보는 것 추천)

치안에 관해 여성경찰관은 남경찰과는 큰 차이를 보인다.

경찰 부서에 더 나은 도움이 된다.

여성경찰관이 더 작고 체력이 약한데?
:지난 40년간 연구결과에 따르면 여성경찰관은 치안에 대한 접근방식이

 권위적이지 않고 신체에 대한 의존도가 낮으며 의사소통이 더 효율적이라는 결과가 있음,

 여성경찰관들은 치열한 싸움에 직면하기 전 폭력적인 대립을 완화하는 것이 낫다는 점이다.
(이 연구는 1970년 초반에 여성 경찰관이 순찰임원으로 실패 할 것이라는 추측에 연구가 진행됨)

여성경찰관에 연구중 하나는 여성이 같은 종류의 상황

(성난 사람, 취한사람, 폭력적인 사람)을 많이 겪었으며 남성만큼 능력이 있음을 발견

이 연구의 가장 중요한 발견은 "여성은 덜 공격적으로 행동하고 공격성이 덜 할 것이라고 믿는다"

연구원은 "여성경찰관의 존재가 폭력을 피하고 폭력적인 상황을 피하는 방법에

주의를 기울이도록 자극 할 수 있다"고 예측한다.

후속연구에서도 동일한 결론에 도달했다.

 1988년 Journal of Police Science and Administration의 Joseph Balkin 연구원은 14년 동안 여성이 경찰업무 참여에 대한 미국과 국제 연구를 검토했다.

그는 여성이 효과적으로 치안을 유지할 뿐만 아니라 잠재적인 폭력 사태를 더 잘 할 수있다는 것을

일률적으로 발견했다. (경찰의 업무는 경찰의 권위를 통해 통제하는 것임으로)

이러한 차이의 영향은 LA경찰국의 1992년 보고서에 다시 드러난다. 위원회가 조사한 사실상의 모든 지표는 여성 LAPD요원이 남성경찰관보다 훨씬 낮은 비율로 과도한 무력 사용에 연루되었음을 입증한다
"여성과 남성 모두 여성 경찰관들이 반항적인 용의자가 덤비거나 무력을 사용하거나 대치하는 대화를 할 필요가 없다고 생각한다"

2002년 주요도시 경찰서에서 여성경찰관과 남성경찰관을 조사한 결과"평균적인 남성경찰이 여성 경찰보다 8.5배 이상 과도한 무력을 사용하며 남성경찰관이 여성경찰관보다 2~3배 이상 과도한 무력으로 컴플레인 걸린다"고 조사되었다.

결론

-여성경찰관은 필요하다

Q: 여성경찰관은 여성과 아동문제, 청소년 문제에만 필요한가??

A: nope 치안문제에도 여성경찰관이 더 도움된다.

여성경찰관에 연구중 하나는 여성이 같은 종류의 상황

(성난 사람, 취한사람, 폭력적인 사람)을 많이 겪었으며 남성만큼 능력이 있음을 발견되었다

근데 왜 여성경찰관 더 안뽑아요???

Over the last year, America has finally begun to acknowledge that it has a police brutality problem. The conversation about solutions has focused on body cameras, better training or stricter use-of-force policies, along with a need for community engagement. But a critical idea is being overlooked: increasing the numbers of women in police ranks.

As David Couper, the former chief of police in Madison, Wis., recently wrote:

Women in policing make a difference — a big difference — they make for a better police department. Haven’t you wondered why women police are not the ones involved in recent officer involved shootings? After all, they are usually smaller, somewhat weaker in physical strength, and yet they don’t appear to shoot suspects as often.

In fact, over the last 40 years, studies have shown that female officers are less authoritarian in their approach to policing, less reliant on physical force and are more effective communicators. Most importantly, female officers are better at defusing potentially violent confrontations before those encounters turn deadly.

This research was prompted by widespread speculation that women, who began joining police departments in larger numbers in the early 1970s, would fail as patrol officers. One of the earliest studies, sponsored by the Police Foundation in 1974, found that women encountered many of the same kinds of situations (involving angry, drunk or violent individuals) and were as capable as men. The study’s most important finding, though, was that “women act less aggressively and they believe in less aggression.” The researchers predicted “the presence of women may stimulate increased attention to the ways of avoiding violence and cooling violent situations without resorting to the use of force.”

Subsequent studies have reached the same conclusions: In a 1988 article in the Journal of Police Science and Administration researcher Joseph Balkin reviewed the U.S. and international research spanning 14 years on the involvement of women in police work. He found uniformly that women not only perform the job of policing effectively, but are better able to defuse potentially violent situations: “Policemen see police work as involving control through authority,” he wrote, “while policewomen see it as a public service.”

The full impact of these differences would be revealed again in the startling findings of the 1992 Christopher Commission report on police brutality in the Los Angeles Police Department. The commission was created in the aftermath of the Rodney King beating and the subsequent devastating riots: “Virtually every indicator examined by the commission establishes that female LAPD officers are involved in excessive use of force at rates substantially below those of male officers.” The commission explained: “Many officers, both male and female, believe female officers are less personally challenged by defiant suspects and feel less need to deal with defiance with immediate force or confrontational language.”

A 2002 study by the National Center for Women & Policing of excessive force incidents in seven major city police departments found that “the average male officer is over eight and a half times more likely than his female counterpart to have an allegation of excessive force sustained against him … [and] two to three times more likely than the average female officer to have a citizen name him in a complaint of excessive force.”

More recent data spanning 2004 to 2014 from the Denver, Indianapolis, Washington, D.C., and Kansas City police departments, reflect these earlier results: Women are named significantly less often than their male counterparts in excessive force complaints.

Despite this evidence that increasing the number of women in law enforcement would significantly reduce police violence, the number of women in policing remains stuck at low levels. As of 2007 (the most recent data available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics), local police departments averaged just 12 percent women in their ranks, only slightly higher than the 7.6 percent of women in local departments 20 years earlier. Only 11.2 percent of sheriffs’ officers were women, and an even smaller 6.5 percent of state police officers were women. However, many of the smallest police agencies have no women, and the vast majority of all agencies have only token numbers of women in top command positions.

Larger police departments average slightly higher percentages of women, at 18 percent, but that’s only because of federal court-ordered consent decrees that forced the largest agencies to hire more women and racial minorities. These decrees, dating from the 1970s and most of which are now expiring, were the result of sex and race discrimination lawsuits pursued by the National Organization for Women and the NAACP.

Why aren’t there more women in policing? Misguided recruiting practices, ongoing discriminatory hiring processes and hostile work places.

Too many police recruiting campaigns feature slick brochures and billboards focused on adrenaline-fueled car chases, swat incidents and helicopter rescues – the kind of policing featured in television dramas and that overwhelmingly appeals to male recruits.  In reality, 80 percent to 95 percent of police work involves nonviolent, service-related activities and interactions with people in the community to solve problems – the kind of policing that appeals to women.

The tests used in the selection and hiring of police recruits are also a problem. Based on the discredited presumption that brute strength is a key requirement for successful performance as a police officer, the vast majority of police agencies use some form of physical abilities testing in their hiring process. These tests tend to emphasize upper-body strength and disqualify some women – and men of slight stature.  Yet physical strength has never been shown to predict a police officer’s effectiveness or ability to handle dangerous situations. Instead, testing should focus on an applicant’s communication skills and ability to defuse potential violence and maintain composure in situations of conflict.

Finally, as in the military and other traditionally male-dominated work forces, female officers face high rates of sexual harassment and negative male attitudes. Too many male officers continue to hold the view that women can’t be effective police officers. And yet, in contrast, studies have shown that community members prefer officer teams with both a woman and a man, largely because they believe women are better able to defuse potentially dangerous situations.

The good news is that changes in recruiting and hiring policies can have a dramatic impact on increasing the number of women in police departments. And, police leadership must place a high priority on recruiting female officers. Local police agencies can look to an effort underway by the U.S. Border Patrol to recruit only women for a major hiring push. The agency recognized that having just five percent women in its ranks impedes its ability to work with the tens of thousands of migrant women who cross the U.S.-Mexico border each year, many of whom suffer sexual assaults during their journey.

The Department of Justice should encourage similar hiring campaigns by local police agencies. Because without specific and enforceable directives to police departments to recruit and hire substantially more women who mirror the racial and ethnic diversity of the communities these agencies serve, I predict there will be painfully little progress. And as result, the inherent gender bias toward police use of violence will continue.

Until now, the national conversation has ignored the benefits gender balancing would bring to the effectiveness of police departments and to the people in their communities. With demands for police reform echoing from the streets to city halls to the White House, the president, the Department of Justice and local public leaders have a perfect opportunity to consider a dramatic, gender-based response.

[for that moment]

ㄱㅆ 난 진짜로 여성경찰관이 너무 필요해 개인적 사정으로도. 그리고 신고하느라 경찰관 여러번 불러봤는데 남경찰관의 안일한문제때문에 짜증났던적이 한두번이아니야.. 실제로 위협도 당했고.. 내가 시민으로써 여성경찰관이 필요하다고!!

[한번에합격하자]

남경들도 존나쓸모없던데

[for that moment]

심지어 저기사는 여성경찰관이 남경보다 치안에 도움이된다라는 기사야 심지어 여자들이 저런거에 도움이된다는데 왜 안뽑아??

[for that moment]

그니까 시발 냄져들끼리 앞에서끌어주고 뒤에서 밀어주고 그러니까 빡대가리새끼들도 경찰한다고 댐비지... 난 경시생도 아니고 그냥 시민인데 경찰에신고했다가 남경찰때문에 2차피해 받은적도있음 하. 좆같아진짜

[김정은 수령동지]

냄져들 경찰 준비하는데 계속 떨어지는 새끼들은 도대체 을매나 대가리가 나쁜거야~?헤에~~

[강대성은내가납치]

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 여자 체력기준가지고 뭐라하더랔ㅋㅋㅌㅋ
필기시험 평균은 지네가 훨낮으먄서 뽑는사람수도 많고

[백현이는왜한명이야]

나 남자였으면 작년에 붙었어ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ졸라빡침 진짜 점수차이 너무 심해

[s(`ㅅ´)z]

한남충 경찰시켜봤자 미성년자 강간이나 시키고 으휴 가성비꽝

[권혁(딘)]

한남경찰 존나 쓸모없구요~~~~~~~~

[2월로또당첨됨]

주변에 경찰준비하는 친구들있는데 진짜 남경이었으면 두세번은 합격했을텐데 내가 다 안타깝더라ㅠㅠㅠ