On goodness
It has sometimes been asked [whether God commands certain things /because they are right,
or whether certain things are right because God commands them. . .
I emphatically embrace the first alternative.
The second might lead /to the abominable conclusion . . .
that charity is good only because God arbitrarily commanded it
—that He might equally well have commanded us to hate Him and one another
and that hatred would then have been right.
I believe, on the contrary, that “they err //who think that of the will of God to do this or that
there is no reason besides His will.”
God’s will is determined by His wisdom //which always perceives,
and His goodness //which always embraces, the intrinsically good.
But when we have said that God commands things /only because they are good,
we must add that [one of the things intrinsically good] is that rational creatures should freely surrender themselves
to their Creator /in obedience.
[The content of our obedience]—the thing we are commanded to do—will always be something /intrinsically good,
something () we ought to do /even if (by an impossible supposition) God had not commanded it.
But in addition to the content, the mere obeying is also intrinsically good,
for, in obeying, a rational creature consciously enacts its creaturely role,
reverses [the act //by which we fell], treads Adam’s dance backward, and returns.
From The Problem of Pain
Compiled in Words to Live By