부정선거가 아이라는게 말도 안된다.

<img src="http://i1.media.daumcdn.net/uf/image/U01/agora/561FB223470254000B" class="txc-image" width="764" style="clear: none; float: none;" data-filename="K-20121226_2.jpg" exif="{}" actualwidth="764" />위 도표가 실제로 존재할 가능성 1/1000000이다 ㅋ그런데 전국 200개투표구의 결과당 ㅋ 계산 10⌒－1200 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 그런데 각선거구도<img src="http://i1.media.daumcdn.net/uf/image/U01/agora/561FB534422F18001C" class="txc-image" width="517" style="clear: none; float: none;" data-filename="K-20121226_1.jpg" exif="{}" actualwidth="517" />이래요 ㅋ계산해보니 (1⌒-1200)⌒81 하여튼 계산기 자체가 하두 가능성자체가 없어 불능이다. ㅋㅋ 실제로 이렇게 나타날 가능성은 불가능하다는 말이 된다. 아직도 부정선거가 아니라고 한다면 지능지수가 30이하이거나 내란범이 확실하다. 그것도 개표의 수학통계적으로만 그렇다는 거 다른 증거들도 산덤이 ㅋㅋㅋ