트럼프 천하재편정국 - 268. 911테러의 주범은 누구였는가?

[피터 김]

부정할 수없는 증거가 확인되다 : 911은 내부 범인과 모사드의 합작품이었다

INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE CONFIRM‎S: 9/11 Was Both An “Inside Job” and “Mossad Job”  By Laurent Guyenot with comments by Ron Feb 17, 2019 - 4:15:23 PM

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=116506

9/11 Was an Israeli Job

미국이 네오콘에 먹혀서 세계 4차대전으로 끌려들어간 곡절 

How America was neoconned into World War IV

LAURENT GUYÉNOT
The Unz Review

기술적으로 불가능한 점 Technical impossibilities

용감한 조사관 덕분에 9/11 사건에 대한 공식적인 설명에서 많은 이상한 점이 다음 달 인터넷에 게시되어 이것이 잘못된 위장작전이었으며 오사마 빈 라덴이 결백하다고 선언했다. 아프가니스탄과 파키스탄 언론과 알 자지라에서. [1] 이 소름끼치는 사기의 증거는 그 이후로 계속 축적되어 왔으며 이제 웹에서 몇 시간의 연구를 할 의향이 있는 사람이라면 누구나 그 정보를 이용할 수 있습니다. (이 기사를 준비하는 동안, 나는 구글이 이것에 접속해서 탐구하는 것을 5 년 전보다 더 어렵게 만들었고, 인위적으로 반 음모 사이트에도 우선 순위를 정하고 있음을 발견했다.)

Thanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the official explanation of the events of 9/11 were posted on the Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al Jazeera.[1] The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing anti-conspiracy sites.)

예를 들어, 9/11 진실에 대한 건축가 및 엔지니어의 구성원은 비행기 추락 및 제트 연료 화재가 쌍둥이 빌딩 붕괴를 유발하는 것이 불가능 함을 입증했습니다. 트럼프 대통령 Donald Trump조차도 이것을 이해했습니다. 실제로 "붕괴"에 대해 말하면 오해의 소지가 있습니다. 즉, 타워가 글자 그대로 폭발하여 콘크리트를 가루 상태로 만들고 수백 톤의 무게를 내는 스틸 빔을 고속으로 측면으로 돌출시킵니다. 화산 먼지와 달리 거리를 통해 즉시 침수된 화생방 먼지는 뜨거운 가스와 비교적 고밀도의 고체 입자가 고온으로 섞여 있다는 것을 나타냅니다. 이런 특별한 상태의 물질적 증거는 단순한 붕괴에서는 불가능한 현상입니다. 비행기로 타격을 입지 않은 또 다른 마천루 (47 층) 인 WTC7은 "통제된 철거"가 아닐 수가 없는데, 그것은 자유 낙하에 가까운 속도로 자체 궤도로 무너졌습니다.

For example, members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have demonstrated that it was impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the collapse of the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump understood this. In fact, speaking of "collapse" is perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The pyroclastic dust that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that WTC7, another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane, collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by "controlled demolition."

사건 직후에 기록된 소방관들의 증언은 비행기 충돌보다 훨씬 낮은 "붕괴"직전 폭발의 연속을 묘사합니다. 공격 후 3 주까지의 잔해 속에 용융된 금속이 존재한다는 것은 불완전하게 연소된 폭발물의 존재를 제외하고는 설명할 수 없다. 소방관 필립 루볼로 Philip Ruvolo는 Étienne Sauret의 카메라에서 Collateral Damages (2011)라는 영화에 대한 증언을 했습니다. "당신은 아래로 내려와 용광로처럼 생긴 용암 강철이 주조와 같은 용암에 있었던 것처럼 그것이 유동금속 채널을 따라 내려가는 것을 볼 수 있습니다."

Testimonies of firefighters recorded shortly after the events describe sequences of explosions just before the "collapse", well below the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo testified before Étienne Sauret's camera for his film Collateral Damages (2011): "You'd get down below and you'd see molten steel-molten steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry-like lava."

항공 전문가는 또한 비행기의 행동 양상에 대한 불가능성을 보고했다. 쌍둥이 빌딩에 타격을 가한 두 항공기의 속도는 443mph와 542mph로 보잉 767 항공기는 배제됩니다. 왜냐하면 이러한 속도는 지상에서 거의 불가능하기 때문입니다. 드물지만 항공기가 떨어져 나가지 않고 그러한 속도가 달성될 수있는 경우, 특히 납치범이라고 비난을 받은 ​​아마추어 조종사의 경우는 그런 식의 임무 수행이 불가능했습니다. 전 조종사였던 호스니 무 바락 (Hosni Mubarak)은 결코 그렇게 할 수 없다고 말했다. (그는 차베스 대통령과 아흐마디네자드가 그중 의문의 여지가 없다.) 제트 여객기의 블랙박스 중 어느 것도 발견되지 않았고, 이해할 수없는 상황이었다.

그리고 물론 Shanksville과 Pentagon 충돌 현장의 명백한 예외가 있습니다. 비행기 또는 믿을 수있는 비행기 파편은 쉽게 사용할 수있는 수많은 사진 중 어느 하나에서도 볼 수 없습니다.

Aviation professionals have also reported impossibilities in the behavior of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing 767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for the hijacking. Hosni Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it. (He is not the only head of state to have voiced his doubts: Chavezand Ahmadinejad are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.

And of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen on any of the numerous photos easily available.

내부 작전이었나, 아님 모사드 작전인가?   Inside Job or Mossad Job?

9/11 테러에 관한 공식 보고서 버전을 믿지 않는 미국인이 늘어나고 있는 가운데, 두 가지 기본 이론이 경쟁에 있습니다. 나는 그들을 "내부 작전"과 "모사드 작전"이라고 불렀습니다. 첫 번째는 소위 9.11 진실 운동 내에서 지배적인 논제이며, 미국 정부 또는 미국의 깊은 국가 (Delap State) 내의 파벌을 비난합니다. 두 번째 주장은 이 음모의 총기획자가 미디어, 정부, 군대 및 비밀스런 정보국을 포함하여 미국 내 모든 권력 분야에 깊숙이 침투해있는 강력한 이스라엘 네트워크의 일원이라고 주장한다.

Among the growing number of Americans who disbelieve the official version of the 9/11 attacks, two basic theories are in competition: I called them "inside job" and "Mossad job". The first one is the dominant thesis within the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, and blames the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State. The second one claims that the masterminds were members of a powerful Israeli network deeply infiltrated in all spheres of power within the US, including media, government, military and secret services.

이 "모사드 직무" 논제는 2012 년 7 월 미국의 육군 대학 및 미 육군 사관학교의 교수인 알란 샤브로스키 Alan Sabrosky가 "9/11 테러와 이스라엘의 전술 및 실수 전술"이라는 기사를 발표한 이래로 계속되고있다. 그는 9 월 11 일이 "고전적인 모사드 - 조종 작전" 이라고 자신의 신념을 표명했다.

우리는 처음부터 이스라엘인이나 아랍인을 유죄로 판정하는 것이 둘 모두 "외부 작전 "이론이라는 사실을 알 수 있습니다. (실제로 그들은 서로의 거울 이미지이며 길라드 아츠몬이 유대인의 "예상된 죄의식"에 대해 설명하는 것에 비추어 이해할 수 있습니다.) [2 ]

This "Mossad job" thesis has been gaining ground since Alan Sabrosky, a professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, published in July 2012 an article entitled "Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake", where he voiced his conviction that September 11th was "a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation."

We can notice from the outset that incriminating Israelis or Arabs are both "outside job" theories (in fact, they are mirror images of each other, which is understandable in light of what Gilad Atzmon explains about Jewish "projected guilt").[2]

증거를 보기조차 전에, "외부 작전"은 "내부 작전" 보다 더 믿을만한 것으로 들립니다. 정부가 수천명의 사람들을 살해하여 시민들을 기만하고 공포에 빠뜨릴 수 있다는 생각에 무언가가 있습니다. 단지 국가의 이익에도 미치지 못하는 일련의 전쟁을 시작하기 위한 것입니다. 이와는 대조적으로, 세 번째 권력의 잘못된 위장작전 아래 미국을 공격하는 외국 세력은 공정한 플레이처럼 보인다. 실제로 이스라엘의 역할에 대한 의혹은 모사드의 명성을 잘 알고있는 사람에게는 자연스러운 것이어야 한다. "와일드 카드 무자비하고 교활한, 미군을 표적으로 하고 팔레스타인 / 아랍 행동처럼 보이게 하는 능력이 있다" 2001 년 9 월 10 일 워싱턴 타임즈 (The Washington Times)에 의해 인용된 미 육군 고급 학교 (Advanced Army Studies)의quoted by the Washington Times, September 10th, 2001 공격 전날.

Before even looking at the evidence, "outside job" sounds more credible that "inside job". There is something monstrous in the idea that a government can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of them, just for starting a series of wars that are not even in the nation's interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the U.S. under the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair play. Indeed suspicion of Israel's role should be natural to anyone aware of the reputation of the Mossad as: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act," in the words of a report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies quoted by the Washington Times, September 10th, 2001 - the day before the attacks.

이것은 중요한 포인트입니다. 왜냐하면 9/11 진실 운동이 어째서 왜 외국의 힘에 의한 공격이라고 주장한 가능성있는 논문을 고려하지 않는지를 답하기 때문이다. 그게 아니라면 아주 심각하고도 터무니없는 "내부 작전" 이라는 테제를 엄청나게 지지하게 되는데, 이것을 감당할 수있느냐는 의문을 제기하고 있다. 그들은 이슬람권이 위장작전을 벌였고 - 그리고 이스라엘이란 외국의 힘이 이런 교묘하고도 무참한 공격을 어떻게 벌였단 말인가?

물론 두 개의 반대 논문은 반드시 서로를 배제하는 것은 아니다. 적어도 이스라엘을 비난하는 사람 중 어느누구도 미국 행정부나 깊은 국가의 부패한 요소가 연루되어 있다는 사실을 부인하지 않는다. 이스라엘과 미국 간의 "열정적인 애착"은 수십 년 동안 진행되어 왔으며, 9/11은 그들의 괴물 같은 자손 중 하나입니다.

This is an important point, because it raises the question of how and why the 9/11 Truth movement has been led to endorse massively the outrageous "inside job" thesis without even considering the more likely thesis of an attack by a foreign power acting under an Islamic false flag-and what foreign power but Israel would do that?

Of course, the two dissenting theses do not necessarily exclude each other; at least, no one incriminating Israel denies that corrupted elements from the American administration or deep state were involved. The "passionate attachment" between Israel and the U.S. has been going on for decades, and 9/11 is one of its monstrous offsprings.

나는 테드와 바바라 올슨의 결혼 Ted and Barbara Olson보다 그 현실에 대한 더 나은 상징을 생각할 수 없다. 테드 올슨 (Ted Olson)은 2000 년 논란에서 부시를 옹호한 후, 법무차관 직을 수여받았다. (딕 체니 부통령이 엔론 관련 문서 제출을 거부했을 때도 이를 방어했다.) 바바라 Barbara는 유명한 CNN 기자였지만 그 전에는 유대인 부모 바바라 케이 브라처 Barbara Kay Bracher 슬하에서 태어났으며, 예시바 법대 Yeshiva University School of Law에서 교육받고 법률 회사인 윌머헤일 WilmerHale (제이미 고어릭 Jamie Gorelick, 9/11의 미래 멤버)에 고용되었습니다. 고어릭은 911 위원회Commission의 회원이었고 그의 고객은 미국내 이스라엘을 위한 감시 활동을 담당하는 spying for Israel in the United States  디지털 통신회사인 암독스 Amdocs와 같은 강력한 이스라엘 회사를 포함합니다.

I can think of no better symbol of that reality than the marriage of Ted and Barbara Olson. Ted Oslon, after having defended Bush in the disputed 2000 election, had been rewarded with the post of Solicitor General (he also defended Dick Cheney when he refused to submit to Congress Enron-related documents). Barbara was a famous CNN reporter, but before that, she was born Barbara Kay Bracher of Jewish parents, educated at Yeshiva University School of Law, and hired by the legal firm WilmerHale, of which Jamie Gorelick, a future member of the 9/11 Commission, was also a member, and whose clients include powerful Israeli firms like Amdocs, a digital communication company charged with spying for Israel in the United States. 

2001 년 9 월 11 일, 바바라 Barbara Olson은 AA77 편으로 비행기 여행중  그녀의 남편에게 두 번 전화를 걸었다고 합니다. 그녀의 전화는 오후에 CNN에 보고되었으며, 그 이야기는 납치범에 의해서만 무기로 사용된 "상자 절단기"와 같은 공식 이야기의 세부 사항을 구체화하는 데 기여했습니다. 테드 올슨 (Teed Olson)은 9/11 테러 이후 TV 쇼에 반복적으로 초청을 받았으며, 부인의 전화 대화에 관해 질문받을 때 자주 모순이 보였다. 2006 년 보고서에서 FBI는 바바라 올슨 (Barbara Olson)으로부터 단 한 건의 전화만을 확인했으며, 0 초 동안 연결되지 않은 전화였습니다. 2004 년까지 고도가 높은 전화를 걸기 위해 필요한 기술이 개발되지 않았기 때문에 [3]  납치된 비행기 안에 있던 절망적인 승객 (유명한 "하이, 엄마, 이것은 마크 빙햄입니다")을 포함한 다른 모든 보고된 전화와 마찬가지로 Barbara의 전화는 명백하게 불가능했습니다. ]

On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson allegedly was on flight AA77, from which she made two telephone calls to her husband. Her calls were reported on CNN in the afternoon, and contributed to crystallize some details of the official story, such as the "box cutters" used as only weapons by the hijackers. Repeatedly invited on television shows after 9/11, Ted Olson frequently contradicted himself when questioned about the calls from his wife. In a 2006 report, the FBI identified only one call from Barbara Olson, and it was an unconnected call lasting 0 seconds. Like all other reported phone calls from desperate passengers (including the famous "Hi, Mom. This is Mark Bingham"), Barbara's call was simply impossible, because the technology required to make high-altitude phone calls was not developed until 2004.[3]

9/11은 이스라엘의 비밀 숭배자들과 부패한 미국 요소들 간의 동맹에 의해 가능하게 되었습니다. 문제는 두 사람 중 누군가가 이 엄청나게 대담하고 복잡한 작업의 주인공이며, "더 높은 목적"이 무엇인지에 대한 질문입니다.

또 다른 질문은 : "9/11이 내부자의 작전"이라고 반복하는 사람들은 이스라엘을 가리키는 강력한 증거를 완전히 무시하는 이유는 무엇입니까? 바꾸어 말하면, 이스라엘을 은폐하려는 "통제된 야당"은 어느 정도까지 구성되어 있는가? 이런 유형의 질문은 위선자라는 잘못된 이론이나 불완전한 이론을 방어하는 사람을 의심하는 것을 의미하지 않습니다. 한 이론이나 다른 이론을 방어하는 대부분의 사람들은 그들이 접근할 수있는 정보를 근거로 진심으로 그렇게 합니다. 나는 자신을 7 년 동안 공식 이론을 믿는 사람으로, 2 년 동안은 "내부 작전" 이론으로 생각하고 2010 년부터 현재의 논의로 점진적으로 나아가고 있다. 대중은 실수로 오해하는 것이 아니라 거짓말을 합니다. 어쨌든, 의견 수렴자의 배경을 조사하는 것이 합법적이며, 거짓말을 하거나 진리를 왜곡하는 경우, 우리는 그들의 동기에 대해 추측할 수 있습니다. 나는 이 기사의 끝 부분에서 이 문제로 돌아올 것이다.

9/11 was made possible by an alliance between secret worshippers of Israel and corrupted American elements. The question is: who, of the two, were the masterminds of this incredibly daring and complex operation, and for what "higher purpose"?

Another question is: why do those who keep repeating as a mantra "9/11 was an inside job" ignore totally the compelling evidence pointing to Israel? In other words, to what extent do they constitute a "controlled opposition" intended to cover up for Israel? Asking this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most people defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the information to which they have access. I have myself been a believer in the official theory for 7 years, and in the "inside job" theory for 2 years, before progressively moving on to the present argument from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those who lead the public into error on a long term are not just mistaken but lying. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the background of opinion makers, and when they are caught lying or distorting the truth, we can speculate on their motivation. I will come back to this issue at the end of the article.

춤추는 이스라엘인들   The dancing Israelis

이스라엘이 9/11을 지휘했다고 믿는 연구자들은 그날 이상하게 체포되면서 "춤추는 이스라엘인 dancing Israelis"으로 알려진 사람들의 행각을 인용했다. 그러나 그 연구자들의 그런 목적은 그것을 "아랍계의 춤 dancing Arabs "이라고 호도하는 것이었다. 표면 상으로는 "중동인의" 옷차림을 입은 저지 시티에 주차된 밴의 지붕에 서있는 여러 증인이 백그라운드에서 무너지는 세계무역센터 WTC를 보면서 사진을 찍었습니다. 바로 그 순간에 첫 번째 비행기가 노스 타워를 때렸다. 용의자들은 밴을 저지 시티의 다른 주차 장소로 옮겼다. 다른 증인들은 그들에게서 같은 자랑질을 하는 모습을 봤다.

Researchers who believe Israel orchestrated 9/11 cite the behavior of a group of individuals who have come to be known as the "dancing Israelis" since their arrest, though their aim was to pass as "dancing Arabs." Dressed in ostensibly "Middle Eastern" attire, they were seen by various witnesses standing on the roof of a van parked in Jersey City, cheering and taking photos of each other with the WTC in the background, at the very moment the first plane hit the North Tower. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same ostentatious celebrations.

뉴저지 뉴스 (NBC News)가 보도한 저지 시티 경찰서에 익명으로 전화한 한 사람은 "2 ~ 3 명이 탑승한 백색 밴이 팔레스타인 인처럼 보이고 건물을 돌고 있다, "고 말했다. 뉴아크 공항에 의해 일부 쓰레기가 섞여 있고 그는 그 셰이크 제복을 입고 있다. [...] 그는 아랍인처럼 옷을 입고 있다. " 경찰은 곧 "뉴욕 테러 공격과 관련이 있을 가능성이 있는 차량"에 대해 다음과 같은 BOLO 경고 (추적하겠다는 be-on-the-look-out)를 발표했다. 백색의 2000 년대 시보레 밴에 'Urban Moving Systems' 제트 여객기가 세계 무역센터 (World Trade Center)에 최초로 충돌했을 때와 연이은 폭발이 터진후 축하하는 모습이 보였다.

One anonymous call to the police in Jersey City, reported the same day by NBC News, mentioned "a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there. They look like Palestinians and going around a building. [...] I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. [...] He's dressed like an Arab." The police soon issued the following BOLO alert (‎be-on-the-look-out) for a "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with ‘Urban Moving Systems' sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion."

우연히, 밴은 오후 4 시경에 시위대와 폴 커츠버그 Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari 등 5 명의 젊은이들과 함께 검문을 당한 적이 있었습니다. 경찰로부터 어떤 질문이 나오기 전에 커츠버그 (Sivan Kurzberg) 운전사는 말했는데, "우리는 이스라엘 사람입니다. 우리는 당신의 문제가 아닙니다. 당신의 문제는 우리의 문제입니다. 팔레스타인은 당신의 문제입니다."커츠버그 형제는 공식적으로 모사드 요원으로 확인되었습니다. 5 명 모두는 공식적으로 도미니크 오토 수테르 (Dominik Otto Suter)가 소유한 도심 이동 시스템 (Urban Moving Systems)이라는 움직이는 회사 (간첩용 클래식 표지)에서 근무했는데, 9월 14 일 이들은 텔아비브 (Tel Aviv)를 향해 도주했다.

By chance, the van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men inside: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari. Before any question was asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, burst out: "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem".The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. All five officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for espionage) named Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, Dominik Otto Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv on September 14.[4]

이 사건은 공격이 발생한 다음날 아침 뉴저지 주 신문 '베르겐 레코드'의 언론인 파울로 리마 (Paulo Lima)에 의해서 보도됬는데, "용의자들"이 아침 공격에 대한 예지력을 확신한 "수사와 관련한 소식통"을 바탕으로 처음 보도됐다. 그들이 자유의 주립 공원에 있을 때 일어날 일을 알았습니다. "(2005 년에 부분적으로 기밀 해제된) 조사에 관한 579 쪽의 FBI 보고서는 몇 가지 중요한 사실을 밝힙니다. 우선, 일단 상황이 발발하면서, 노스 타워를 불 태우면서 용의자들이 찍은 사진은 축하의 태도를 확인합니다.

This event was first reported the day after the attacks by journalist Paulo Lima in the New Jersey newspaper The Bergen Record, based on "sources close to the investigation" who were convinced of the suspects' foreknowledge of the morning's attacks: "It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park".The 579-page FBI report on the investigation that followed (partially declassified in 2005) reveals several important facts. First, once developed, the photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire confirm‎ their attitudes of celebration:

"그들은 미소를 지으며 서로 포옹을 나누었고 그들은 서로 환호하는 '하이파이브'를 나누는 것처럼 보였다. 이들의 용의점을설명하기 위해 용의자들은 이 테러 공격 덕분에 "미국은 세계 테러를 막을 수있는 조치를 취할 것"이라고 간단히 말했다. 그러나 이 시점에서 두 번째 타워가 타격을 받기 전에 대부분의 미국인들은 이 사건이 사고라고 생각했습니다. 하지만 5 명의 이스라엘인들은 달랐는데,19 명의 추정 자살 납치범과의 접촉으로 체포된 다른 5 명의 이스라엘인을 고용  Classic International Movers라고 불리는 다른 회사와 관련이 있다고 판명되었다. 또한 5 명의 용의자 중 한 명은 "중동의 이슬람 무장 세력과 확실한 관계를 맺고 남미에서 개인"이라고 불렀다. 마지막으로, FBI 보고서는 "차량은 또한 폭발성 흔적의 존재에 대해 긍정적인 결과를 가져온 훈련된 폭탄 탐지견에 의해 검색되었습니다, "라고 명시합니다.

"They smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to ‘high five' one another". To explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply happy that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, "the United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world". Yet at this point, before the second tower was hit, most Americans believed the crash was an accident. The five Israelis were found connected to another company called Classic International Movers, which employed five other Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed suicide hijackers. In addition, one of the five suspects had called "an individual in South America with authentic ties to Islamic militants in the middle east". Finally, the FBI report states that the "The vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive traces".

이 모든 유죄를 입증한 증거가 나온 후에 보고서의 가장 수수께끼로 남은 구절이 나온다. "FBI는 더 이상 수감자들에 대한 수사에 관심이 없으며 적절한 이민 절차를 진행해야 한다, "는 결론. 실제로 2001 년 9 월 25 일 미국 이민 귀화국 (Federal Immigration and Naturalization Service)에 보낸 서신은 사건 발생 2 주 이내에 FBI 연방 본부가 조사를 종결하기로 이미 결정했으며 "미국 이민국 귀화국은 적절한 이민 절차를 진행해야 합니다. " "하이파이브 (high fivers)"라고도 알려진 5 명의 "춤추는 이스라엘인"은 브루클린 교도소에서 71 일간 구금되어 첫 번째로 거부한 후 검출기 테스트를 받습니다. 마지막으로, 그들은 "비자 위반"에 대한 최소한의 혐의로 조용히 이스라엘로 돌아갔다. 그 중 세 명은 2001 년 11 월 이스라엘 TV 토크쇼에 초청되었으며, 그 중 한 명은 다음과 같이 선언했습니다. "우리의 목적은 단순히 사건을 기록하는 것이었습니다." 라구요.

After all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of the report: its conclusion that "the FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the detainees and they should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings". In fact, a letter addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated September 25, 2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the events, the FBI federal headquarter had already decided to close the investigation, asking that "The U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings". The five "dancing Israelis", also known as "the high fivers", were detained 71 days in a Brooklyn prison, where they first refused, then failed, lie detector tests. Finally, they were quietly returned to Israel under the minimal charge of "visa violation." Three of them were then invited on an Israeli TV talk show in November 2001, where one of them ingenuously declared: "Our purpose was simply to document the event."

이스라엘 스파이 네트워크   The Israeli spy network

9/11 테러 직후에 체포된 유일한 용의자인 5 명의 "춤추는 이스라엘인"은 빙산의 일각에 불과했습니다. 2001 년 9 월, 연방 경찰은 미국 땅에서 발견된 가장 큰 이스라엘 간첩 네트워크를 해체하는 중이다. 2001년 11월 23일 워싱턴포스트 (Washington Post)에 의해 대중에게 공개될 보고서를 집계한 DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency)는 지난 2001년 12월 11 일 폭스 뉴스 (Fox News)에서 칼 카메론 (Carl Cameron)의 4 부분 다큐멘터리 방송을 내보냈는다.

The five "dancing Israelis," the only suspects arrested on the very day of the 9/11 attacks, were just the tip of an iceberg. In September 2001, the federal police were busy dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever uncovered on American soil. In the summer preceding the attack, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a report which would be revealed to the public by the Washington Post on November 23rd, 2001, followed by a Carl Cameron's four-part documentary broadcast on Fox News from December 11th, 2001. 

2002 년 3 월 14 일 실베인 사이펠 (Sylvain Cypel)의 르몽드자인드 Le Mondesigned라는 프랑스 신문에 실린 기사에서도 Intelligence Online이 인터넷에서 완벽하게 접근할 수있게 되기 직전에 이 보고서를 언급했다. [20] 20 세 사이의 140 명의 이스라엘 간첩 30 명은 2001 년 3 월 이후 체포됐고 60 명은 9 월 11 일 이후 체포됐다. 미술계 학생들은 일반적으로 국방부의 민감한 36 개 사이트를 방문했다. "의문을 가진 사람들의 대다수는 군대 정보부, 전자신호 차단 장치 또는 폭발물 처리 장치에 사용되었다고 진술했다.

On March 14th, 2002, an article in French newspaper Le Mondesigned by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before the French magazine Intelligence Online made it fully accessible on the Internet.[5]It said that 140 Israeli spies, aged between 20 and 30, had been arrested since March 2001, while 60 more were arrested after September 11. Generally posing as art students, they visited at least "36 sensitive sites of the Department of Defense." "A majority of those questioned have stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance units. 

Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot mission unit." Another, Peer Segalovitz, officer in the 605 Battalion of the Golan Heights, "acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and anything else that he needed to."[6]

Of special interest is the mention that "the Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these individuals."[7] More than 30 out of the 140 fake Israeli students identified before 9/11 lived in that city of 140,000 inhabitants. And this city also happens to be the place where fifteen of the nineteen alleged 9/11 Islamist hijackers had regrouped (nine in Hollywood, six in the vicinity), including four of the five supposed to have hijacked Flight AA11. What was the relationship between the Israeli spies and the Islamist terrorists? We were told by mainstream news that the former were monitoring the latter, but failed to report suspicious activities of these terrorists to American authorities. From such a presentation, Israel comes out clean, since a spy agency cannot be blamed for not sharing information with the country it is spying in. At worst, the Israeli Intelligence can be accused of "letting it happen"-a guarantee of impunity. In reality, the Israeli agents were certainly not just monitoring the future "hijackers," but financing and manipulating them, before disposing of them. We know that Israeli Hanan Serfaty, who rented two flats near Mohamed Atta, had handled at least $100,000 in three months. And we also learned from the New York Times on February 19, 2009, that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had spent twenty-five years spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah.

Israeli agents apparently appreciate operating under the cover of artists. Shortly before September 11, a group of fourteen Jewish "artists" under the name of Gelatin installed themselves on the ninety-first floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center. There, as a work of "street art," they removed a window and extended a wooden balcony. To understand what role this piece of scaffolding may have played, it must be remembered that the explosion supposedly resulting from the impact of the Boeing AA11 on the North Tower took place between the ninety-second and the ninety-eighth floors. With the only film of the impact on the North Tower being that of the Naudet brothers, who are under suspicion for numerous reasons, many researchers are convinced that no aircraft hit this tower, and that the explosion simulating the impact was provoked by pre-planted explosives inside the tower.

Floors ninety-three to one hundred of the North Tower were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, whose CEO was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of wealthy Zionist (and financier of George W. Bush) Maurice Greenberg, who also happens to be the owner of Kroll Inc., the firm in charge of security for the entire World Trade Center complex on 9/11. The Greenbergs were also the insurers of the Twin Towers and, on July 24, 2001, they took the precaution of having the contract reinsured by competitors. In November 2000, the board of directors of Marsh & McLennan was joined by (Lewis) Paul Bremer, the chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism, who, on September 11, 2001, two hours only after the pulverization of the North Tower, would appear on NBC to name bin Laden as prime suspect, perfectly calm as 400 of his employees are missing (295 will finally be declared dead). "It is the day that will change our lives," he said. "It is the day when the war that the terrorists declared on the US [. . .] has been brought home to the US." In 2003, Bremer would be appointed administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to level the Iraqi state to the ground and oversee the theft of almost a trillion dollars intended for its reconstruction.

초 사야님 조직    The super-sayanim

골드버그와 브레머와 함께 우리는 음모의 상위 수준에 도달했습니다. 미국 정부의 내부와 외부에서 일하는 영향력있는 유대인 성향의 사람들이 있습니다. 외국 정부의 대표자인 래리 실버스테인 (Larry Silverstein)은 그의 파트너인 프랭크 로우 (Frank Lowy)와 함께 2001 년 봄 뉴욕시에서 쌍둥이 빌딩을 임대한 부동산 상어입니다. 뉴욕 항구당국의 책임자인 실버스타인 (Silverstein)과 루이 아이젠버그 (Lewis Eisenberg)는 유대인 항소 연맹 (UEW)의 다른 회원이자 전 AIPAC의 부회장이었다. 쌍둥이 빌딩은 석면에 대한 오염물 제거가 필요했기 때문에 Silverstein이 비참한 거래를 한 것으로 보입니다. 오염 제거 프로세스는 1989 년 거의 10 억 달러로 추정되는 비용 때문에 1980 년대부터 무한정 연기되었습니다. 2001 년 뉴욕 ​​항만당국은 Silverstein에게 책임을 전가하는 데 너무 기뻤습니다.

With Goldberg and Bremer, we have reached the upper level of the conspiracy, comprising a number of influential Jewish personalities, working inside and outside the U.S. government - super-sayanim, so to speak. The most representative of those outside government is Larry Silverstein, the real estate shark who, with his partner Frank Lowy, leased the Twin Towers from New York City in the spring of 2001.The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted Silverstein and Lowy the lease, was none other than Lewis Eisenberg, another member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation and former vice-president of AIPAC. It appeared that Silverstein had made a disastrous deal, because the Twin Towers had to be decontaminated for asbestos. The decontamination process had been indefinitely postponed since the 1980s because of its cost, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 1989. In 2001, the New York Port Authority had been all too happy to shift responsibility to Silverstein.

쌍둥이 빌딩 인수 직후 Silverstein은 보험 계약을 테러 공격에 충당하기 위해 재협상하여 보험금을 35 억 달러로 두 배로 늘렸고 그러한 사건 이후에 재건할 권리를 유지할 수 있도록 했습니다. 공격이 있은 후, 그는 보험사를 두 배의 보상금을 받기 위해 법원에 데려갔습니다. 두 대의 비행기가 별개의 두 가지 공격이라고 주장했습니다. 오랜 합법적인 싸움 끝에 그는 45 억 달러의 돈을 받아냈다. 실버스타인 (Silverstein)은 이스라엘 유대인 연맹 (United Jewish Appeal Federation of New York)의 대표 회원입니다. 이스라엘에 대한 최대 기금 모금 행사인 미국 정부 (이스라엘에 대한 지원금으로 연간 30 억 달러를 지불 한 후). Silverstein은 또한 Haaretz (2001 년 11 월 21 일)에 따르면 "Netanyahu와 긴밀한 관계"를 유지했습니다.

Immediately after acquiring the Twin Towers, Silverstein renegotiated the insurance contracts to cover terrorist attacks, doubling the coverage to $3.5 billion, and made sure he would retain the right to rebuild after such an event. After the attacks, he took his insurers to court in order to receive double compensation, claiming that the two planes were two separate attacks. After a long legal battle, he pocketed $4.5 billion. Silverstein is a leading member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, the biggest fundraiser for Israel (after the US government, which pays about $3 billion per year in aid to Israel). Silverstein also maintained "close ties with Netanyahu," according to Haaretz (November 21, 2001): 

"The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu's stint as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein." Besides being a powerful man, Larry is a lucky man: as he explained in this interview, every morning of the week, he had breakfast at the Windows on the World on top of the North Tower, but on September 11th, he had an appointment with his dermatologist.

Accomplices to the 9/11 false flag attack with strong Israeli connections should also be tracked at the other end of the trajectory of the planes reported to have crashed into the Twin Towers. Flights AA11 and UA175 took off from Logan Airport in Boston, which subcontracted their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), a firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon, a treasurer of the Likud. So did Newark Airport where flight UA93 reportedly took off before crashing in Shanksville.

A serious investigation would follow many other trails, such as the Odigo instant messages received by employees at the WTC two hours before the plane crashes, as reported by Haaretz on September 27th, 2001. The first plane hit the WTC at the precise time announced, "almost to the minute," admitted Alex Diamandis, vice-president of Odigo, headquartered in Israel. Also disturbing is the behavior of the American branch of Zim Israel Navigational, a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state (occasionally used as a cover for the Israeli secret services), which moved its offices from the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4th, 2001, one week before the attacks -"like an act of God, we moved", said the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when interviewed by USA Today, November 17th, 2001.

But of course, none of these trails were ever pursued. That is because the most powerful conspirators were at the highest level of the Justice Department. Michael Chertoff was head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and responsible, among many other things, for securing the release of the Israeli agents arrested before and after 9/11, including the "dancing Israelis." In 2003, this son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer would be appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of counter-terrorism on the American soil, which allowed him to control dissenting citizens and restrain access to the evidence under the pretext of Sensitive Security Information.

Another chief of the cover-up was Philip Zelikow, the executive director of the 9/11 presidential Commission established in November 2002. Zelikow is a self-styled specialist in the art of making "public myths" by "‘searing' or ‘molding' events [that] take on ‘transcendent' importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene" (Wikipedia). In December 1998, he co-signed an article for Foreign Affairs entitled "Catastrophic Terrorism," in which he speculated on what would have happened if the 1993 WTC bombing (already attributed to bin Laden) had been done with a nuclear bomb: "An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America's history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans' fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. ... Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force." This is the man who controlled the governmental investigation on the 9/11 terror attacks. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, who nominally led the commission, revealed in their book Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (2006), that the commission "was set up to fail" from the beginning. Zelikow, they claim, had already written a synopsis and a conclusion for the final report before the first meeting.He controlled all the working groups, prevented them from communicating with each other, and gave them as sole mission to prove the official story; Team 1A, for example, was tasked to "tell the story of Al-Qaeda's most successful operation-the 9/11 attacks."

A tight control of mainstream media is perhaps the most delicate aspect of the whole operation. I will not delve into that aspect, for we all know what to expect from the MSM. For a groundbreaking argument on the extent to which 9/11 was psy-op orchestrated by MSM, I recommend Ace Baker's 2012 documentary 9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera, chapters 6, 7 and 8.

마키아벨리 주의 초 시오니스트들 Machiavellian meta-Zionists [Ron: A more correct label is neo-Pharisees or JEWS]

If we move up to the very highest level of the conspiracy, we find ourselves in Tel Aviv. The preparation for 9/11 coincided with the coming to power of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, followed by Ehud Barak in July 1999, and Ariel Sharon in March 2001, who brought back Netanyahu as minister of Foreign Affairs in 2002 (with Netanyahu again becoming prime minister in 2009). It must be noted that both Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were temporarily out of the Israeli government in September 2001, just like Ben-Gurion at the time of Kennedy's assassination (read my article on JFK). A few months before 9/11, Barak, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, was "recruited" as a consultant to a Mossad front company, SCP Partner, specializing in security and located less than seven miles from Urban Moving Systems.[8] One hour after the explosion of the North Tower, Barak was on BBC World to point the finger at bin Laden (the first to do so), and concluded: "It's a time to launch an operational, complete war against terror."

As for Netanyahu, we are not surprised to hear him boast, on CNN in 2006, of having predicted in 1995 that, "if the West doesn't wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center." Netanyahu is exemplary of the ever closer "special relationship" between the US and Israel, which started with [Ron: Harry S(olomon)] Truman and blossomed under Johnson [Ron: Another neo-Pharisee. See eg: Our First Jewish President Lyndon Johnson? – an update!! - http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Our-First-Jewish-President-Lyndon-Johnson-an-update.shtml ] . Netanyahu had lived, studied, and worked in the United States from 1960 to 1978, between his 11thand his 27th year-except during his military service-and again after the age of 33, when he was appointed deputy ambassador to Washington and then permanent delegate to the United Nations. Netanyahu appeared regularly on CNN in the early 1990s, contributing to the transformation of the world's leading news channel into a major Zionist [Ron: ie a neo-Pharisaic] propaganda tool. His political destiny was largely planned and shaped in the United States, under the supervision of those we now call neoconservatives, and the only thing that distinguishes him from them is that, for public relations reasons, he does not possess American nationality.

"What's a neocon?" once asked Bush 43 to his father Bush 41, after more than three years in the White House. "Do you want names, or a description?" answered 41. "Description." "Well," said 41, "I'll give it to you in one word: Israel."[9] That anecdote, quoted by Andrew Cockburn, sums it up. The neoconservative movement was born in the editorial office of the monthly magazine Commentary, which had replaced the Contemporary Jewish Record in 1945 as the press organ of the American Jewish Committee. "If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it," wrote Gal Beckerman in the Jewish Daily Forward, January 6, 2006. "It is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants' grandchildren."

[Ron: Tell me again why you think that Jews do not form a FIFTH COLUMN in the US].

The founding fathers of neoconservatism (Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Adam Shulsky) were self-proclaimed disciples of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish immigrant teaching at the University of Chicago. Strauss can be characterized as a meta-Zionist in the sense that, while an ardent supporter of the State of Israel, he rejected the idea that Israel as a nation should be contained within borders; Israel must retain her specificity, which is to be everywhere, he said in essence in his 1962 lecture "Why We Remain Jews." Strauss would also approve of being called a Machiavellian, for in his Thoughts on Machiavelli, he praised the "the intrepidity of his thought, the grandeur of his vision, and the graceful subtlety of his speech" (p. 13). Machiavelli's model of a prince was Cesar Borgia, the tyrant who after having appointed the cruel Ramiro d'Orco to subdue the province of Romania, had him executed with utter cruelty, thus reaping the people's gratitude after having diverted their hatred onto another. Machiavelli, writes Strauss, "is a patriot of a particular kind: He is more concerned with the salvation of his fatherland than with the salvation of his soul" (p. 10). And that happens to be exactly what Jewishness is all about, according to Jewish thinkers such as Harry Waton: "The Jews that have a deeper understanding of Judaism know that the only immortality there is for the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people" (read more here). As a matter of fact, in the Jewish World Review of June 7, 1999, Michael Ledeen, a neocon and founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), assumed that Machiavelli must have been a "secret Jew," since "if you listen to his political philosophy you will hear Jewish music."

The neoconservatives of the first generation originally positioned themselves on the far left. Irving Kristol, one of the main editors of Commentary, had long claimed to be a Trotskyist. It was soon after the 1967 successful annexation of Arab territories by Israel that the Straussians experienced their conversion to right-wing militarism, to which they owe their new name. Norman Podhoretz, editor-in-chief from 1960 to 1995, turned from anti-war activist to defense budget booster in the early 70s. He gave the following explanation in 1979: "American support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs-from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood [. . .] that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel." (Breaking Ranks, p. 336). Leading the U.S. into war for the benefit of Israel is the essence of the Machiavellian crypto-Zionists known deceptively as neoconservatives.

The Project for a new (((American))) Century

The story of how the neoconservatives reached the position of influence they held under George W. Bush is a complicated one, which I can only outline. They entered the state apparatus for the first time in the baggage of Rumsfeld and Cheney, during president Ford's cabinet reshuffle known as the "Halloween Massacre," following Nixon's resignation. When the Cold War calmed down after America evacuated its troops from Vietnam in 1973, and the CIA produced reassuring analyses of the USSR's military capabilities and ambitions, Rumsfeld (as Secretary of Defense) and Cheney (as Chief of Staff) persuaded Ford to appoint an independent committee, known as Team B, to revise upward the CIA estimates of the Soviet threat, and reactivate a war attitude in public opinion, Congress, and Administration. Team B was chaired by Richard Pipes and co-chaired by Paul Wolfowitz, both introduced by Richard Perle.

During the Democratic parenthesis of the Carter presidency (1976-80), the neoconservatives worked at unifying the largest number of Jews around their policies, by founding the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), which became the second-most powerful pro-Israel lobby after AIPAC. According to its "mission statement", it is "dedicated to educating Congressional, military and civilian national security decision-makers on American defense and strategic interests, primarily in the Middle East, the cornerstone of which is a robust U.S.-Israeli security cooperation." In 1980, the neocons were rewarded by Ronald Reagan for their support by a dozen posts in national security and foreign policy: Richard Perle and Douglas Feith to the Department of Defense; Richard Pipes at the National Security Council; Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, and Michael Ledeen in the State Department. They helped Reagan escalate the Cold War, showering billions of dollars on the military-industrial complex.

The long term planning of 9/11 probably started then. Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services (Shai in 1944, Shin Bet in 1948, Mossad until 1963) is reported as prophesizing in 1980, in an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic terrorism would end up hitting America in their "phallic symbol": "Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit".[10] (A whole article would be needed to document and explain the revival of the Jewish gift of apocalyptic prophecy in recent decades.)

In 1996, during the Clinton years, the neoconservatives threw all their weight into their ultimate think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), directed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any rival. Their Statement of Principles vowed to extend the current Pax Americana, which entailed "a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges." In its September 2000 report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses, PNAC anticipated that US forces must become "able to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars." This required a profound transformation, including the development of "a new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements." Unfortunately, according to the authors of the report, "the process of transformation [...] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor." It is certainly no coincidence that the three-hour-long blockbuster Pearl Harbor was released in the summer 2001, conveniently entrenching the "New Pearl Harbor" meme into the minds of millions.

PNAC's architects played the American hegemony card by draping themselves in the super-patriotic discourse of America's civilizing mission. But their duplicity is exposed in a document brought to public knowledge in 2008: a report published in 1996 by the Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, written specifically for the new Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who figured the same year among the signatories of PNAC. As its title suggests, the Clean Break report invited Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which officially committed Israel to the return of the territories it occupied illegally since 1967. The new prime minister should instead "engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism" and reaffirm Israel's right to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

In November 2000, Bush Jr. was elected under conditions that raised protests of electoral fraud. Dick Cheney, who had directed his campaign, named himself vice-president and introduced two dozens neoconservatives in foreign policy key positions. The State Department was entrusted to Colin Powell, but he was surrounded with neocon aides such as David Wurmser. As National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, a specialist of Russia with no expertise in the Middle East, was entirely dependent on her neocon adviser Philip Zelikow. William Luti and Elliott Abrams, and later Eliot Cohen, were also tasked with steering Rice. But it was mainly from within the Defense Department under Donald Rumsfeld that the most influential neocons were able to fashion US foreign and military policy. Richard Perle occupied the crucial position of director of the Defense Policy Board, responsible for defining military strategy, while Paul Wolfowitz became the "soul of the Pentagon" as deputy secretary with Douglas Feith as undersecretary.

The Hanukkah miracle to start WWIV

After eight months in the presidency, Bush was confronted with the "catastrophic event," the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had wished for a year earlier. 9/11 was a real "Hanukkah miracle" for Israel, commented Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and Israeli National Security Council chairman Uzi Dayan. Netanyahu rejoiced: "It's very good [...] it will generate immediate sympathy [...], strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror." On September 21, he published an op-ed in the New York Post entitled "Today, We Are All Americans," in which he delivered his favorite propaganda line: "For the bin Ladens of the world, Israel is merely a sideshow. America is the target." Three days later the New Republic responded with a headline on behalf of the Americans: "We are all Israelis now." Americans experienced 9/11 as an act of hatred from the Arab world, and they felt an immediate sympathy for Israel, which the neoconservatives relentlessly exploited. One of the aims was to encourage Americans to view Israel's oppression of the Palestinians as part of the global fight against Islamic terrorism.

It was a great success. In the years preceding September 11, Israel's reputation had bottomed out; condemnations had been raining from around the world for its policy of apartheid and colonization, and its systematic war against Palestinian command structures. Increasing numbers of American voices questioned the merits of the special relationship between the United States and Israel. From the day of the attacks, it was all over. As Americans now intended to fight Arab terrorists to the death, they would stop demanding from Israel more reasonable, proportionate retaliation against Palestinian suicide bombers and rockets.

Instead, the president's speeches (written by neocon David Frum) characterized the 9/11 attacks as the trigger for a world war of a new type, one fought against an invisible enemy scattered throughout the Middle East. First, vengeance must come not only against bin Laden, but also against the state harboring him: "We will make no distinction between those who committed these acts and those who harbor them" (Sept. 11). Second, the war extends to the world: "Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated" (Sept. 20). Third, any country that does not support Washington will be treated as an enemy: "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists" (Sept. 20).

In an article in the Wall Street Journal dated November 20, 2001, the neoconservative Eliot Cohen dubbed the war against terrorism as "World War IV," a framing soon echoed by other American Zionists (the odd choice of the name WWIV rather than WWIII comes, I suspect, from the neocons' ethnocentric worldview, in which every world war is a step toward Greater Israel; since one major step was accomplished in 1967, the Cold War counts as WW3). In September 2004, at a conference in Washington entitled "World War IV: Why We Fight, Whom We Fight, How We Fight," Cohen said: "The enemy in this war is not ‘terrorism' [...] but militant Islam." Like the Cold War, the imminent world war, according to Cohen's vision, has ideological roots, will have global implications, and will last a long time, involving a whole range of conflicts. The self-fulfilling prophecy of a new World War centered in the Middle East has also been popularized by Norman Podhoretz, in "How to Win World War IV" (Commentary, February 2002), followed by a second article in, "World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win," (September 2004), and finally a book titled World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism (2007).[11]

The hijacked conspiracy and the controlled opposition

In the case of 9/11 as in the case of Kennedy, controlled opposition operates on many levels, and many honest scholars now realize that the 9/11 Truth movement itself is partly channeled by individuals and groups secretly aiming at drawing suspicions away from Israel. Such is certainly the case of the three young Jews (Avery, Rowe, and Bermas) who directed the film Loose Change(2005), the most widely watched 9/11 conspiracy film since its first version in 2005. They hitched their whole thesis on a comparison with the never carried-out false flag project Operation Northwoods (timely revealed to the public in May 2001 in James Bamford's book Body of Secrets, written with the support of former NSA director Michael Hayden, now working for Michael Chertoff), but they failed to mention the attack on the USS Liberty, a well-documented false flag attack by Israel on its U.S. ally. They did not breathe a word about the neoconservatives' loyalty to Israel, and treat anyone who cited the Israeli role in 9/11 as anti-Semitic. The same can be said of Bermas's more recent film Invisible Empire (2010), also produced by Alex Jones: a compilation of anti-imperialist clichés focusing on the Bushes and the Rockefellers, without a single hint of the (((Others))).

It is interesting to note that the 9/11 scenario put forward by Loose Change had actually been prewritten by Hollywood: on the 4th of March, 2001, Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series The Lone Gunmen, watched by 13 million Americans. The plot is about computer hackers working for a secret cabal within the U.S. government, who hijack a jet by remote control with the intent to crash it into one of the Twin Towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control of the plane. The purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Truthers of the "inside job" school fancy that this episode must have been written by some whistleblower inside Fox. Unlikely!

There is, of course, some truth in the "inside job" theory, as I said at the beginning. Israel (in the wider sense) would not be able to pull such an operation and get away with it, without complicity at the highest level of U.S. government. How does that work? Pretty much like for the Kennedy assassination, if you consider that the country was then ruled by its vice-president Dick Cheney, the president being a mere dummy (see Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein, Vice: Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency, Random House, 2006). In my book JFK-9/11, I have proposed a plausible scenario of how Israel had in fact hijacked a smaller false flag attack on the Pentagon fabricated by the American Deep State, for the limited purpose of justifying the overthrow of the Talibans in Afghanistan, a goal fully supported by such "Great Gamers" as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but which didn't in itself interest the neocons.

What the neocons wanted was a new war against Iraq and then a general conflagration in the Middle East leading to the crumbling of all the enemies of Israel, with Syria and Iran high on the list. So they outbid everyone and gave the operation the scale they wanted with the help of their New York super-sayan Silvertein. George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and other goyim who had been kept out of the loop, finding themselves embroiled in geopolitical machinations of global scope, could merely try to save face. On September 19 and 20, Richard Perle's Defense Policy Board met in the company of Paul Wolfowitz and Bernard Lewis (inventor of the self-fulfilling prophecy of the "clash of civilizations") but in the absence of Powell and Rice. They prepared a letter to Bush, written on PNAC letterhead, to remind him of his historic mission: "Even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism."[12] This was an ultimatum. Bush was certainly aware of the leverage that the neocons had acquired over the major print and television media. He was obliged, under penalty of ending in the proverbial trash bin of history, to endorse the invasion of Iraq that his father had refused the Zionists ten years earlier.

As for Brzezinski and other genuine U.S. imperialists, their support for the invasion of Afghanistan made their timid protests against the Iraq war ineffective. It was a little late in February 2007 when Brzezinski denounced before the Senate "a historical, strategic and moral calamity [...] driven by Manichaean impulses and imperial hubris." In 2012 he declared, regarding the risk of conflagration with Iran, that Obama should stop following Israel like a "stupid mule." He soon disappeared from the MSM, as a useful idiot no longer useful.

The "half truth" of the exclusively "inside job" theory, which denounces 9/11 as a false flag operation perpetrated by the American state on its own citizens, functions like a secondary false flag hiding the real masters of the operation, who are in fact agents in the service of a foreign nation. One of the aims of this inside-jobish controlled opposition is to force American officials to maintain the "bin Laden did it" masquerade, knowing that tearing apart the fake Islamic flag would only reveal the U.S. flag, not the Israeli flag. No longer controlling the media, they would not have the means to raise this second veil to expose Israel. Any effort to get at the truth would be political suicide. Everyone understands what is at stake: if one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the official bin Laden story, the well-rehearsed slogan "9/11 was an inside job" will have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain untouchable (Machiavelli's method: make another accomplish your dirty ends, then turn popular vengeance against him). And God knows what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded in disarming its citizens through Sandy Hook-type psy-ops. Government officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next fifty years.

After reaching this conclusion in JFK-9/11, I had the satisfaction of finding that Victor Thorn, in a book that had eluded me (Made in Israel: 9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America, Sisyphus Press, 2011), had already expressed it in harsher terms: "In essence, the ‘9-11 truth movement' was created prior to Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli complicity. By 2002-2003, ‘truthers' began appearing at rallies holding placards that read ‘9-11 was an inside job.' Initially, these signs provided hope for those who didn't believe the government and mainstream media's absurd cover stories. But then an awful realization emerged: The slogan ‘9-11 was an inside job' was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised. [...] The mantra, ‘9-11 was an inside job' is only partially true and is inherently damaging to the ‘truth movement' because it shifts all attention away from Israel's traitorous assault against America. [...] Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know the truth about Israel's 9-11 barbarity. Their willingness to perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and vile as those who launched the attacks. There are no degrees of separation in this matter. It's a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth about Israel's Murder, Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected bed as these murdering dogs lie in. [...] Faux conspiratologists complain about the government and news sources not telling the truth, yet they've erected an utter blackout on data regarding Israel and 9-11."

The missing .3 trillion

Some readers will complain that I am making a very complex operation appear too simple. I plead guilty: I have merely tried here to outline the case against Israel in the short scope of an article. But I am fully aware that creating Greater Israel through a world war fought by the U.S. might not have been the only consideration in the preparation of 9/11. Many private interests had to be involved. Yet I believe none of them interfered with Israel's plan, and most of them supported it.

There is, for example, the missing gold in the WTC basement : $200 million were recovered from the estimated $1 billion stored: who took the rest? But that is nothing compared to the $2.3 trillion that were missing from the accounts of the Department of Defense for the year 2000, in addition to $1.1 trillion missing for 1999, according to a televised declaration made on September 10th, 2001, the day before the attacks, by Donald Rumsfeld. Just for comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses of Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All this money evaporated into thin air under the watch of William Cohen, Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton's second term. In 2001, the man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions was Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and an ordained rabbi. Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by financial analysts at Resource Services Washington (RSW). Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by "al-Qaeda" the following morning. The "hijackers" or Flight AA77, rather than hitting the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose to attempt a theoretically impossible downward spiral at 180 degrees in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in their offices, together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted in the biography of the team leader Robert Russell for the National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial: "The weekend before his death, his entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were celebrating the end of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically, every person that attended that party was involved in the Pentagon explosion, and are currently missing".

By an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to make sense of the Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported to have died at the precise location of his office, not because he was working there that day, but because he was on a business trip on Flight AA77. In the words of the Washington Post database: "Bryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching America's defense budget. He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official business in California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would have been at work at his computer". Yahweh must have a sense of chutzpah!

[Ron: 911 can be called an inside job ONLY because it was organised and implemented by neo-Pharisees (who call themselves JEWS) who form a Talmudic FIFTH COLUMN within the US government and nation. The reason our world is a dystopia is that for thousands of years it has been subjected to an organised assault on the consciousness and integrity of the general population by covert demonic spiritual forces using Talmudism and other forms of Satanism to subvert and destroy the God given impulse towards peace, love and sovereignty inherent in human beings.

The only known long term successful gentile societal containment of the insidious Pharisaic, FIFTH Column Talmudist onslaught in the last two thousand years was achieved by the Byzantine Empire. That success staved offcovert Talmudic control for over a thousand years and in fact the population of Anatolia and Palestine was not overrun by neo-Pharisees until Kemal Ataturk, a Donmeh Sabbataen (a pretend Muslim), and the Donmehs, subverting the Ottoman Empire and instigating the Armenian Holocaust; and the Rothschilds' dominated British Empire conquered Palestine during WWI. The Byzantine Empire survived for over a thousand years by excluding Pharisees and neo-Pharisees from positions in governance, the judiciary, education and medicine. Among other things, the Code of Justinian forbade neo-Pharisees (Jews):

* To engage in proselytism;

* To possess Orthodox Christian servants;

* To hold office or honors in the Roman state;

* To build new synagogues;

* To read the Old Testament in Hebrew but rather in Greek which did not cut out the prophecies that pointed to Jesus Christ;

* To use Judaic interpretations of the Old Testament;

* To bear witness in court against an Orthodox Christian;

* To hold teaching positions in Roman schools or as private tutors.

See eg: Ezra Pound's formula for preventing Jewish conquest from within -- peaceful methods derived from the Byzantine Empire. - http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Ezra_Pound_s_formula_for_preventing_Jewish_conques_4333.shtml

트럼프 천하재편정국 - 116. 워싱턴 대결이 극심해진다|경제 이야기2018.09.14 07:57:27 no force on Earth can break us apart. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-patriot-day-2018/ 트럼프 내외, 911 테러 추모 공원 방문 2018.09.12 | 로이터 | 다음뉴스 911 테러 17주기 연례 추모제가 열린 미국 펜실베이니아주 샹크스빌 인근 플라이트 93 국립 기념지에서...

미국정부가 911사태를 조사한 것은 어떻게 왜곡되었는가?|경제 이야기2017.09.19 06:45:59 할 질문에 답합니다. 그는 당신의 "통제자"입니다. 감이 잡히나요? 2003 년 10 월 2 일, 9/11 테러사건 조사실에서 있었던 일이다 ; 2001 년 9 월 11 일 911 테러사태에서 일어났던 일에 대한 메모가 두 명의 위원회 변호인, 마커스 Daniel Marcus와 던네 Steven Dunne에게 보내졌습니다. 그것은 불길하게 표제가...

오늘의 시사뉴스 - 속보 (휴즈)|경제 이야기2015.06.09 08:32:39 others/newsview?newsid=20150608213314222 모두들 집단 최면에서 하루빨리 깨어나시기를.. http://cafe.daum.net/revelation1/HaXZ/4846 미국에서 일어난 911테러를 기억하십니까? 그 때 당시에도 지금 한국처럼 뉴스에는 온통 911테러 얘기 뿐이었습니다. 집단세뇌에 빠진 미국민들은 자신들의 자유를 헌신짝처럼...

에프비아이 FBI 전 국장 테드 군더슨의 양심선언|에너지 이야기2013.06.15 09:48:01 지배통제당하는 첩보실태를 증언한다는 것은 매우 중요한 일입니다. 군더슨은 911테러공격이 일어나기 전에 엔에스에이와 CIA 가 그 전모를 다 파악하고서 미국...공작에 연루되어있다고 까지 증언합니다. 결국 이 말은 미국의 첩보기관이 911 사건에 연루되거나 공모자였음만이 아니라 대통령도 사전에 공모했음을 의미... 테드 군더슨,  에프비아이국장,  미국첩보부는 알고있다,  모두가 짜여진 소설,  미국민은 홀딱 속았다,  이스라엘은 미국을 통제했다,  비밀권을 쥐고 흔들었다

미국의 오늘은 누가 통제하나요? - 동영상|경제 이야기2016.07.22 07:39:28 존에프케네디 암살로부터 911 테러사태까지 최고 부자의 농간이었다 JFK to 911 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick – 11/19/14 (3:27:55) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM&feature=player_detailpage 2014. 11. 19. 누가 어떻게 왜 케네디대통령을 암살했는가? 세계 1차대전부터 오늘에 이르기까지 역사적...