
[이원영의 생명·탈핵 실크로드] 원전 해체, 지상명령이자 블루오션
<원문보기>
http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?code=990100&artid=201710192236005
<일어 번역>
https://ameblo.jp/yksalan/entry-12321645706.html
<영문 번역>
[Lee Won Young's New Silk Road for Life and
No-Nukes] Dismantling NPPs, the most urgent requisite and a Blue Ocean (Kyunghyang Shinmun (20 October 2017))
In the fall of 2014, Martin Brandauer, a
young researcher at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) near the Rhine
Nuclear Power Station, opened a massive gate at a large laboratory and switched
it on. A remote device then begins to peel off the shell of the large metal
body. "When dismantling the nuclear power plant, it is possible to reduce
the amount of high level waste by stripping off the radioactivity concentrated
on the surface."
Sascha Gentes, a senior
professor, explained that companies are also collaborating and training in this
lab. He was a scientist majored in safety engineering and went to Taiwan in the
past to build a safety device that can withstand earthquakes. In this way, safety
engineering workers are also responsible for dismantling the nuclear power
plants in Germany.
Last July, I was able to hear the vivid
story of the earthquake that hit Taiwan three years ago on my way to the
pilgrimage for life and New Silk Road for Life and No-Nukes (LIFEROAD) in
Taiwan. Taiwan suffered a massive earthquake of magnitude 7.6 in 1999, and
thousands of people were killed in 1999. Last year, after a magnitude 6.4
earthquake, 140 people were killed or disappeared. Because of these
earthquakes, Taiwan's decision to decommission its NPPs is receiving a huge
public support. In May of this year, I remembered Professor Gentes when I was
walking in the southern part of South Korea where there was a great earthquake
of 5.0 magnitude. We
also experienced the earthquake of magnitude 5.8 in Gyeongju last year.
I remember answering a question from
students in Laos last month. "Nuclear weapons can be controlled by humans,
but nuclear power plants cannot be controlled." “It is 'helpless to earthquake
or terrorism”. Stopping the construction
of new NPPs and dismantling and disposing existing NPPs are now the most urgent
requisite. And it is also a huge blue ocean. Deloitte, the global accounting
firm, said in 2 years ago, "Currently, among 588 nuclear power plants
worldwide 150 have been suspended for good. Of these, only 19 were dismantled. The
demand for dismantling will increase greatly such as 183 units in the 2020s and
216 units in the 2030s, and the total cost of dismantling would be about 440
trillion won.
Nuclear dismantling technology is a
technology with high social added value that leads to safety and security.
There is a great deal of interest in the tight implementation of technology.
Dr. Jan Bremmer, of KIT, who came to the
Seminar to discuss the preparation of the World Society for Safe Dismantling of
NPPS, jointly hosted by Buddhism and Won Buddhism in 2013, said, "First, it
takes very long time to dismantle a NPP completely. There are two ways:
dismantling immediately or 20 years later, both of which result in a
fundamental problem of storing nuclear waste after dismantling. Second, robotic
technology is important in a field site full of radioactivity. Third, the
process should be subdivided into stages and the highly skilled engineers should
be involved in each stage and there should be an oversight organization. "
Therefore, the last government suggested to
establish a NPP dismantlement center with big money. However, it was not able
to make the decision in time as it could not finalize the preliminary
feasibility study, and the plan got lost last year due to a rule about failing
to spend the set budget. The value of safety problem cannot accurately calculate.
The plan went down the drain because the last government focused on its
'validity' based on numbers to save its bureaucratic face.
The direction of the plan was wrong from
the beginning. The previous experience is crucial for the dismantlement of NPPS,
and we have no one to teach us. The only nations which have proper experience
of NPP dismantling and disposal are the United States and Germany. To do it properly,
you should bring in experts from these countries. And we should learn from
them. 'People' should be considered first.
Nuclear energy related schools in South
Korea are weak in safety and dismantlement. There are no specialized professors
in all nine universities and the curriculum is poor. We have to change this.
KIT is a model teacher. The 500 new engineers coming out from it each year are
an important asset. As such we can also consider 35,000 existing workers in the
nuclear power industry and related fields as assets. The No-Nuke policy
includes the conversion of employment structure for these workers.
A basic plan for the decommissioning of
nuclear power plants should also be established.
A scenario should be established to ensure
peace of mind about the old nuclear power plants. The plan is directly linked
to economic effects and security policies at home and abroad. A long-term
program must be in place to work with the global market like semiconductor and
information technology (IT).
I said to the Laos students: "We
started this, but you have to finish this. As this plan will take 100 years of
time."
Lee Won Young, prof. of Suwon National
University /
Director, National Land Future Research
Institute
(translated by IM Kyung-bin and PARK Jun-kyu)
Original Korean article:
http://m.khan.co.kr/view.html?artid=201710192236005&code=990100&med_id=khan#csidx0cdfdbd25fd7246bc6138995992aea2