(정동희 29)대낮에 술취한 호주 행정부의 Random Walk는 예측가능성을 제로로 만들고, '호주는 강도 정부의 나라'로 아시아에

[정동희]

대낮에 술취한 호주 행정부의 Random Walk는 예측가능성을 제로로 만들고, '호주는 강도 정부의 나라'로 아시아에 각인될 뿐이다 

예측 가능성은 시스템 상태를 미리 예측할 수 있는 정도를 의미합니다. 예측과 가능성이라는 두 단어로 구성되어 있습니다. 
공공서비스를 제공하는 정부 공무원 책임자급은 이 예측 가능성이 훼손되지 않게 최소한 모범을 보여야 할 의무가 있다.
명색이 호주 법무장관이라면, 법의 예측 가능성이 미리 예측할 수 없을 정도로 혼돈과 무원칙으로 자신의 공권력 행사가 되지 않도록 더더욱 모범이 되어야 한다.
예측가능성의 반대말은 '전격성'(電擊性)이다. 전격성이란 파업이 사용자가 예측할 수 없을 정도로 전격적으로 이뤄졌음을 뜻하는 용어다.

술 취한 주정뱅이의 갈지자 걸음을 Random Walk라고 한다.
주말 도심 유흥가 시내 주점거리에서도 늦은 밤에 가끔 볼 수 있는 게 Random Walk이다.
그런데 호주 법무장관실에서 대낮에 이런  Random Walk가 무려 다음과 같이 5개나 연속 나타난다. 이것은, '장관 자격이 없는 사람이 법무장관을 하고 있거나' 또는 '호주 정부 수장인 총독과 총리가 무능력하거나' 둘 중의 하나일 가능성이 매우 높다.

①
2024년 12월 30일에 민사재판 승소자의 재판종결 절차가 마무리되는 시점에, 이 건과 전혀 무관한 23년10월 벌금 이미 완납 건을 억지로 이 재판종결과 관련지어 이미 낸 벌금의 3배 이상을 내게 할 뿐만 아니라 기한을 정하여 그 기한 내에 내지 않으면 모든 권리를 박탈하겠다고 서호주 법무장관은 공권력 강행

②
이러한 이중처벌은 국제법에 반하기 때문에 재판 승소자는 즉각 이를 서호주 법무장관에 항의하고, '이게 마지막 비용이냐?'고 대리인을 직접 보내 물음. 그 날이 2025년 1월 6일이고 서호주 법무장관은 구두로 그렇다고 확인했고 그 날 오후에로 약속. 결과적으로 서호주 법무장관이 정부문서에 허위 약속을 하게 됨이 바로 2025년1월23일에 증명됨.

③
2025년 1월 6일의 서호주 법무장관의  'This is absolutely final fees'라고 적힌 정부문서는 문서 하단에 배포처들 중에 'The banking supervision bureau'도 명시되어 있음. 따라서 설사 그 때 나한테 덜 받은 비용이 The banking supervision bureau가 그 문서를 받고 말해야 할 의무가 있는데 당시 이 문서를 받고도 가만히 있음. 그러니 당연히 내 입장에서는 이 문서 배포처에서 뒤늦게 다른 소리를 할 것이라고 전혀 예상을 할 수 없음. 

④
이 호주정부의 문서 약속을 믿고 나는 매우 구할 수 없는 위험한 돈을 사실상 내 목숨을 담보로 구해 2025년1월17일 납부. 그런데 불과 몇 일 뒤에, 서호주 법무장관과 The banking supervision bureau는 이미 2024년 11월에 내 재판종결 비용에 대해 물어서 납부한 송금료를 거액으로 부풀려 이중청구

⑤
이중처벌, 자신의 정부문서 허위 약속, 이중청구 등의 매우 국제법에 반하는 서호주 법무장관 등의 공권력 집행임. 그런데 거꾸로 적반하장 격으로 '이미 재판승소자 원고의 한국 자산이 고갈되어 부채 밖에 없다는 사실을 잘 알면서도' 24년2월 호주정부 출자은행장의 뇌물부패 사건 발생 당시 중단된 나의 인출금 175만불의 전용이나 다른 가능한 방법에 대해 가로막음. 오로지 '호주 고위공무원의 뇌물부패 사건 최초 신고자인 나로 인해 24년 4월 호주 국고에 18M USD 국고 수입이 이루어진 점'에 대해 전혀 고마워하지 않고 오히려 공익신고자 재산 몰수에 모든 정신이 집중되어 있는 강도 정부 행태를 보이고 있음.

이러한 내용을 호주 각계 정치인들에게도 지난 한 달간 꾸준히 호소하고 있는데, 오늘 호주 연방 상원의원은 엉뚱하게 다음 내용이 제목인 글을 나에게 보내옴.
'지구 온난화 효과보다 이민완화정책 효과가 경제에 더 나쁜 영향을 미친다'는 제목의 글이었음.
호주는 아직도 약탈주의에 입각하여 모든 걸 보고 있다는 걸 나의 사례 등에서 여실히 보여주고 있다.
대낮에 술취한 호주 고위공무원의 Random Walk는 예측가능성을 제로로 만들고, 호주는 강도 정부의 나라로 아시아에 각인될 뿐이다 

The Australian administration's drunken random walk in broad daylight reduces predictability to zero and only leaves an imprint in Asia as 'a country with a robber government'.

Predictability refers to the degree to which the state of a system can be predicted in advance. It consists of two words: prediction and possibility.

Government officials who provide public services have an obligation to at least set an example so that this predictability is not undermined.

If he is the Attorney General of Australia in name, he must set an even greater example so that the exercise of his public power does not become so chaotic and unprincipled that the predictability of the law cannot be predicted in advance.

The opposite of predictability is ‘electricity’. Shock is a term that means that the strike took place so suddenly that employers could not have predicted it.

The walking pace of a drunken drunkard is called Random Walk.

Random Walk is something that can sometimes be seen late at night in the downtown entertainment district and downtown bars on weekends.

However, in the Australian Attorney General's Office, as many as five random walks like this appear in a row in broad daylight, as shown below.

It is very likely that either 'a person who is not qualified to be a minister is serving as the Attorney General' or 'the heads of the Australian government, the Governor-General and the Prime Minister, are incompetent'.

①

At the time when the trial closure process for the winner of the civil trial is completed on December 30, 2024, the Attorney General of Western Australia used public power to forcibly force the fine already paid in October 23, which was completely unrelated to this case, to be paid more than three times the fine already paid in connection with the conclusion of this trial, and to set a deadline and deprive him of all rights if he did not pay within the deadline.

②

Because this type of double punishment is against international law, the person who won the trial immediately protested this to the Attorney General of Western Australia and personally sent a representative to ask, ‘Is this the final fee?’

The date is January 6, 2025, and the Attorney General of Western Australia verbally confirmed that it was and promised to do so that afternoon.

It was proven on January 23, 2025 that the Attorney General of Western Australia made false promises in government documents.

③

A government document dated January 6, 2025, written by the Attorney General of Western Australia, 'This is absolutely final fees', also lists 'The banking supervision bureau' among the distribution sources at the bottom of the document.

Therefore, even if the fee was less than that paid to me at that time, the banking supervision bureau has an obligation to receive the document and speak up, but at the time, it remained silent even after receiving this document.

So, of course, from my point of view, I cannot expect that the distributor of this document will say anything different later on.

④

Believing in this Australian government's written promise, I virtually risked my life for this extremely unobtainable and dangerous money and paid it on January 17, 2025.

However, just a few days later, the Western Australian Attorney General and the banking supervision bureau had already inquired about my trial completion costs in November 2024, inflating the remittance fee I paid by a large amount and double-billing.

⑤

It is an exercise of public power by the Attorney General of Western Australia, etc., which is very contrary to international law, such as double punishment, false promises in his government documents, and double billing.

However, on the contrary, as if it were a red flag, 'even though they knew well that the Korean assets of the plaintiff who won the trial had already been depleted and they were left with nothing but debt', they blocked the diversion of the $1.75 million in withdrawals that had been suspended when the bribery corruption case of the head of an Australian government-funded bank occurred in February 2024, or any other possible method.

The government is not grateful at all for the fact that 18M USD was brought to the Australian treasury in April 2024 solely due to me, the first reporter of the bribery and corruption case of high-ranking Australian public officials, and is instead showing the behavior of a robber government that is focused on confiscating the assets of public interest reporters.

I have been consistently appealing this to Australian politicians from all walks of life for the past month, and today, an Australian federal senator strangely sent me an article with the following title.

It was an article titled, ‘The effect of immigration relaxation policy has a worse impact on the economy than the effect of global warming.’

My case clearly shows that Australia still views everything based on predatory principles.

The random walk of a high-ranking Australian government official drunk in broad daylight reduces predictability to zero, and Australia is only remembered in Asia as a country with a robber government.