미본토 방어체계 재정비 예산 청원서

[BLUEANGEL]

미국은 이제 "북한, 이란"의 미사일 공격 위협을 "전략적인내"로는 더이상 버티기 힘든 모양입니다.
의원들이 트럼프 정부에게 문제가 있는 본토 방어시스템을 전면 재정비하기 위한 예산을 마련하라고 한 목소리로 애원하고 있는것 같으니 말입니다.

Opportunity to Squash Iran, China, N. Korea Missile Threats
Congressional allies want wholesale revamp of U.S. missile defense systems
February 8, 2017 5:00 am

The newly installed Trump administration is eyeing an opportunity to revamp the U.S. domestic missile defense system to combat evolving threats posed by Iran, China, North Korea, and other rogue regimes, according to senior White House officials and new congressional communication disclosing how nations across the globe are "working diligently to exploit the many gaps and seams" in America's current defenses.

트럼프 정부가 이란, 중국, 북한 등으로 부터의 미사일 공격으로 부터 방어시스템을 구축하길 요구하는 법안자들의 요구가 있었다네요.

Congressional allies of the Trump administration's national security vision recently petitioned the White House to allocate funds needed to rebuild and update the country's missile defense systems, which have been beset by problems and can no longer defend against the latest missile technology.

이를 재구축하기 위한 자금을 신년 예산에 반영 하길 요구하는 내용인데, 현재 방어 체제가 새로운 미사일 기술을 대응하기엔 문제가 심각해 보인다는 내용같습니다.

Iran's latest test of ballistic missile technology has only reinforced the belief in Congress that something must be done to secure the American homeland, according to a team of nearly 30 leading lawmakers led by Rep. Trent Franks (R., Ariz.), co-chair of the House's missile defense caucus.

근래 있었던 이란의 탄도미사일 시험이 미본토 방위를 위한 안건에 대한 거의 30명이나 되는 법안가의 동의 서명을 끌어 낸것 같군요.

With threats from rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea evolving—and illicit procurement networks between them growing—the new administration faces the threat of a direct attack on the United States.

이란, 북한간에 구매 거래가 미본토 직접공격에 위험요소로 인식하는것 같습니다.

One senior official on the White House's National Security Council told the Free Beacon that the administration supports these efforts and views them as "common sense."

"The president signaled repeatedly on the campaign trail that he's interested in this, and that he understands both the offensive and defensive capability," the official said. "Given the number of missile tests we've seen, obviously, from North Korea and Iran over the last year this is just common sense."

작년에 북한과 이란이 보여준 미사일 시험 횟수만 봐도 공격, 방어를 위한 시스템 강화는 상식이고 트럼프도 대선 과정에서 이 문제에 관심이 있고, 이해하고 있음을 여러차례 강조를 한것 같다네요.

The official specifically highlighted the threat from Electromagetic Pulse attacks, or EMP attacks, which could cripple the country's infrastructure. These sorts of attacks represent a "major concern" for the White House, the source said.

근데, 무엇보다 크게 걱정하는건 전자기펄스 공격이나 EMP 공격으로 인해 국가 기반시설이 마비되는 위협이라고 강조했답니다.

Some in Congress have been concerned that the new administration would only work to counter threats from Iran and North Korea, while ignoring the ongoing missile buildup taking place in other countries around the globe.

트럼프 정부는 다른 나라들로 부터 받고있는 위협은 무시하고 이란, 북한으로 부터의 위협을 대응하는데 만 집중하라는 의견도 있었나 보네요.

Franks and other lawmakers who petitioned the Trump administration late last week expressed concern the White House "may focus on only protecting against a missile-based attack ‘from states like Iran and North Korea,' per the White House website," according to a copy of the letter.

이하는 Franks와 다른 법안가 들이 이란과 북한으로 부터의 미사일 기반 공격을 방어하기 위해서만 집중하라고 트럼프 정부에 청원서의 요약입니다.

"As you know," the lawmakers write, "our near-peer competitors are working diligently to exploit the many gaps and seams in our missile defense architecture, and continue to modernize their strategic weapons while the United States allows our aging missile defense system to fall behind this evolving threat."

The lawmakers seek to ensure "President Trump and his national security team understand the extraordinary opportunity they have to potentially ‘leapfrog' the ballistic missile threat posed by our most advanced near-peer competitors," according to the letter.

Previous administrations have failed to fund adequately a range of missile defense systems being developed, according to the lawmakers, who are looking for greater funding for these programs in the Trump administration's upcoming budget.

"By finally investing the appropriate resources into promising missile defense capabilities such as directed energy, fully supporting our next generation programs, and building the infrastructure in space and on the ground for a more robust missile defense system, the Trump administration can put its stamp on an American missile defense architecture which will protect the U.S. and our allies from the world's deadliest weapons for years to come," the letter states.

The most recent National Defense Authorization Act, which funds all American defense priorities, mandates a wholesale refurbishing of America's missile defense systems.

"Rather than guarding against on a ‘limited' threat, it is now the policy of the United States to ‘maintain and improve an effective, robust, layered missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States, allies, deployed forces, and capabilities against the developing and increasingly complex ballistic missile threat,'" the lawmakers informed the White House in the letter.

"Building a robust missile defense architecture, capable of defending against any threat from any nation, will be a legacy no ‘pen and phone' can undo, and Americans will live safe and free for generations to come that's to the missile defense architecture built by the Trump Administration."

Once these advanced systems are in place, future governments will be unable to remove them.

"The significance of all these programs is that, once they are developed and built, there is no reversing them—the technology and infrastructure will be there," the lawmakers write. "Once the technology is mastered, the concrete poured, and the satellites deployed, the architecture is there to stay, regardless of which party controls Congress and the White House."

Lawmakers are advocating the Trump administration work to deploy multi-mission space sensors capable of detecting even the most advanced missile technology before it reaches America.

They also want construction to start on an east coast missile defense site that would "shore up our missile defense architecture and further protect our homeland from the Iranian missile threat," according to the letter.

Additionally, Congress seeks to boost funding for the Multi-Object Kill Vehicle program, which can detect enemy warheads, including those with decoy technology.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/trump-admin-eyes-opportunity-squash-iran-china-n-korea-missile-threat/

[역사나무]

북.미 평화협정은..
미국이 북한의 체제를 인정하는 것이고..
북한 체제의 확산에 날개를 달아주는 것이고..
그건 곧 자주사상의 세계화를 의미하죠.

즉..
세계 모든 국가들이 자주화(정상국가화)
될수있는 길을 활짝 열어주게 된다는 거죠.
북.미 평화협정이..

정상적인 국가는..
금력이나 특정세력의 정치개입이 없는 상태..
정치 지도자들은 청렴도와 애민정신의로..
철저히 무장되어야 가능한데요.

북한의 상호 호혜적 외교가 세계로 확산되면..
정상국가가 되어야만 호혜외교가 이루어져서.
경제발전이 순조롭게 이루어질수 있는거죠.

즉..
"자본가"들이 설 자리가 사라진다능..

자본가들에 식민지..
영.미.프..들이 버티는 이유..^^.

[BLUEANGEL]

본 청원을 주도하고 있는 Trent Franks라는 작자는 지난번 사드 문제에 대해,
'"사드를 내 집 뒤뜰에 두겠다" 등의 발언으로 사드(THAAD) 안전성을 한국 언론을 통해 강조하고 있는 미 하원 군사위원회 소속 트렌트 프랭크스(공화, 애리조나) 의원이고, 사드 제작사로들로부터 정치후원금을 받은 것으로 밝혀져 그의 발언에 신뢰성과 진실성을 둘러싼 논란이 커질 것으로 보인다."라고 하네요.
결국, 군수업체의 잇권을 이번 트럼프 정권에서도 영위하기 위한 개수작으로 보입니다.
미국의 안보를 담보로 하는 달콤한 협박을 트럼프가 어떻게 받아들일지는 지켜봐야 겠습니다.

[kkhh4618]

온세계가 일어나 이참에 미국을 왕따시켜 보통국가로 만들어놔야 미국이 정신을 차릴건데