엘레닌 혜성은, 새 시대를 알리는 오고 있는 우주선인가?

[이브]

Is Comet Elenin an incoming spacecraft heralding a New Age?

July 4, 2011

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.

Comet Elenin is an incoming spacecraft or intelligently controlled object according to a number of presenters at a recently completed conference hosted online by the popular whistleblower website – Project Camelot. Several presenters agreed that Elenin will approach its closest points near the Sun and Earth at a time of extraordinary planetary and societal changes coinciding with the end of the Mayan Calendar. A number of anonymous whistleblowers were cited in support of the view that Elenin was an artificially controlled object responsible for widespread planetary changes in the solar system.

최근에 마친 인기 있는 고발자 웹사이트인 프라젝트 캐멀랏에 의해 온라인에서 주관한 회의에서 많은 발표자에 의하면, 엘레닌 혜성은 (태양계로) 들어오고 있는 우주선이거나 知的으로 통제되는 물체이다. 마여曆 끝과 때를 같이 하여 非常한 行星적 사회적 변화의 시기에, 엘레닌은 태양과 지구에 가장 가까운 지점에 이를 것이라고 여러 발표자들이 의견을 같이 했다. 엘레닌은 태양계에서 광범위한 행성 변화에 책임이 있는 인공적으로 통제되는 물체라는 견해를 지지(지원)하는 데에 여러 명의 익명의 고발자들 말이 인용되었다.

The conference broke important ground in uncovering some of the mystery surrounding Comet Elenin, and revealing expert opinions and whistleblower testimonies describing its artificial design and the significance of its orbit. In a surprising omission, the conference organizers did not feature ground breaking scientific literature detailing the seismic impact of Elenin on Earth. Combining insights from the overlooked scientific data and the conference proceedings points to an extraordinary conclusion – Comet Elenin is generating powerful gravity disruption technologies indicative of one or more interstellar spacecraft travelling towards Earth.

그 회의는 엘레닌 혜성을 둘러싼 미스터리의 일부를 드러내게 하는데 있어서 중요한 착공(시공)을 했고, 그 궤도의 의미와 그 인위적인 디자인을 설명하는 고발자들의 증언 그리고 전문가들의 의견을 공개했다. 놀랍게도 빠뜨린 것은, 그 회의 개최자들이 엘레닌의 지구에 대한 심각한 충격을 자세히 설명하는 획기적인 과학적 문서를 대서특필하지 않았다.

대충 본 과학적 데이터와 회의 과정에서 얻은 내용으로 종합해 본 식견(통찰력)은 비상한 결론 - 엘레닌 혜성은, 지구를 향해 여행하는 하나나 둘의 항성 간 우주선을 나타내는 강력한 중력 붕괴(혼란) 기술을 발생시키고 있다 - 을 나타낸다.

The Conference: Elenin was hosted by Kerry Cassidy and featured five presenters who discussed their research data and insights on Comet Elenin. Richard Hoagland, Dr Joseph Farrell, Keith Hunter, Dr Carl Johan Calleman, and Andy Lloyd. Hoagland began the conference with a succinct presentation on the significance of Elenin’s orbit, and why this pointed to it being either an artificial object under intelligent control (an ancient spacecraft) or a natural body (a comet) that has been deliberately launched on an artificial orbit. He placed special emphasis on Elenin’s perihelion (closest point to the sun) on September 11, 2011 as evidence that this was a result of artificial design to draw attention to the profound geopolitical events that occurred ten years earlier. Hoagland also pointed out that around the time Elenin would be passing by the Earth’s orbit on its outbound leg, that another celestial object Asteroid 2005YU55 would pass only 200,000 miles from the Earth on November 8. This was ‘coincidentally’ one day before FEMA was scheduling a FEMA Homeland Security Test where many television and radio networks would relinquish air time for some security drill – coincidence or did national security leaders know something of major significance was about to happen?

The next presenter was Keith Hunter who claimed that planets radiate harmonic signatures that influence orbits and seismic activity. Hunter clamed that Elenin is a small mass that could do something unusual if caught up in powerful harmonic configurations. Hunter’s most important contribution was to point out the relationship between seismic activity and planetary configurations. Sadly, he was not aware of the work conducted by Dr Mensur Omerbashich who had put together an exhaustive study of Elenin’s alignments with a number of planetary bodies during powerful seismic events on Earth. Dr Omerbashich claims that since 2006, comet Elenin has had a measurable impact on the Earth’s seismic activity. Dr Omerbashich’s paper was released on April 11, 2011 and is titled “Astronomical Alignments as the cause of ~M6 + seismicity.”His basic idea is that as planetary bodies align with the Earth, seismic activity increases. He provides historic data on large earthquakes, greater than magnitude 6, and how these have occurred during planetary alignments.

The Mayan Calendar according to the next conference presenter, Dr Carl Calleman, operates in 9 distinct levels or waves. The ninth wave, coinciding with the End of the Mayan Calendar, occurs on October 28, 2011. Calleman believes that the world will enter a New Age based on an expanding “unity consciousness.” While the precise ending of the Mayan Calendar is disputed by others advocating a December 21, 2012 end date, Calleman has produced cogent arguments for the October 2011 end date. He noted that the date coincides with Elenin’s crossing of Earth’s orbit suggesting it may have far more significance than generally attributed to it.

그 다음 회의 발표자 칼 칼레만 박사에 의하면 마여력은 분명한 9개의 수준 혹은 파동에서 작동(작용)한다. 마여력의 끝과 일치하는 제 9의 파동은 2011.10.28.에 일어난다. 세계는 확장하는 “통일 의식”에 근거한 새로운 시대로 들어갈 것이라고 칼레만은 믿는다. 2012.12.21.(이 마여력의 끝이라고)을 옹호하는 다른 사람들에 의해 정확한 마여력의 끝이 혼란스럽지만, 칼레만은 2011.10월이 마지막이라는 것에 대해 설득력 있는 주장을 했다. 그 날짜는 엘레닌이 지구 궤도를 횡단하는 것과 일치하고, 그것은 일반적으로 부여하는 의미보다 훨씬 더 클 것일지도 모른다고 제시한다고 그는 말했다.

The main conference organizer, Kerry Cassidy, revealed that a number of anonymous whistleblowers had revealed that Elenin is a piloted spacecraft, and in fact was being trailed by a fleet of spacecraft. Hoagland claims that he has been confidentially told similarly by other whistleblowers of the artificial nature of Elenin. Dr Joseph Farrell agreed and claimed that Elenin was either an artificial object (controlled spacecraft) or a natural object placed in an artificial orbit. In probably the most significant observation of the conference, Hoagland claimed that Elenin was likely an active torsion field generator.

A torsion field describes the influence a spinning object exerts on its environment. In the case of a slowly spinning stationary gyroscope, for example, the torsion field has been observed to be almost zero. However, for moving gyroscopes rotating at velocities above 20,000 RPM, the torsion field has been observed to have a number of interesting properties. Russian scientists have been the leaders in the study of torsion fields. The most revolutionary results so far reveal that torsion fields impact on gravity and travel faster than electromagnetic radiation or radio signals. Professor Nikolai Kozyrev, a Russian pioneer in the study of torsion fields, experimentally confirmed that torsion fields travel at least 109 times the speed of light.

Kozyrev’s observations were experimentally confirmed by numerous other Russian scientists together with a few western colleagues. The work of Kozyrev and other scientists points to torsion fields as a possible means for extraterrestrial civilizations to travel large interstellar and even intergalactic distances. Significantly, the whistleblower, Bob Lazar revealed that extraterrestrial spacecraft used gravity waves for both navigation and propulsion purposes. Torsion field generators could be used to create the necessary gravity waves for spacecraft traveling long distances.

All presenters agreed that Elenin was not a super-large planetary body such as a red dwarf star mentioned by some researchers that was generating some alarm in the general public. As observed in an earlier article by this writer, Elenin’s orbit indicates that it is not a red dwarf star or large planetary body. In short, Elenin has a small mass as most astronomers contend, and indeed emphasized by Andy Lloyd and others in the Elenin conference. Yet, the pronounced seismic influence when it aligned with the Earth and the sun or other planetary body, as observed by Dr Omerbashich, indicated that Elenin was somehow exerting a powerful gravitational influence. If not a large planetary body, then Elenin’s seismic influence could be explained by it generating powerful gravity waves over long distances. Elenin was generating a powerful torsion field effect – something one or more spacecraft could be doing if traveling along Elenin’s orbital path to the inner solar system.

http://news.exopoliticsinstitute.org/index.php/is-comet-elenin-an-incoming-spacecraft-heralding-a-new-age/

(이 url에 가면 엘레닌 혜성 궤도 시뮬레이션 비디오가 있습니다. 여기도 올렸는데 나오지 않습니다.)

In conclusion, the Project Camelot: Elenin conference provided a number of important insights into Comet Elenin – the most important being its artificiality, the torsion field effects it was exerting, and the possibility that it is some kind of spacecraft. Unfortunately, the omission of Dr Omerbashich’s work in the discussion meant that seismic impact of Elenin through planetary alignments was not adequately covered.

If Elenin is generating powerful torsion field effects and seismicity, these can be expected to magnify as it gets closer. This is especially so when Elenin aligns with the Earth and the sun on September 26, 2011. If Elenin, however, is one or more intelligently guided spacecraft, then the torsion fields it is generating may vary as it approaches and passes by the Earth.

결론으로, 프라젝트 캐멀랏: 엘레닌 회의는 엘레닌 혜성에 대해 몇 가지 중요한 식견(통찰력) - 가장 중요한 것은 그것이 인위적이라는 것, 그것이 행사하는 토션 필드 효과, 그리고 그것이 일종의 우주선일 가능성 - 을 제공했다. (토션 필드 : 중력, 약력, 강력, 전자기력 외 제 5의 힘) 불행하게도, 그 토론에서 오메르바쉬히 박사의 작품이 빠진 것은 행성 정렬을 통한 엘레닌의 지진 충격은 적절하게 다루지 않은 것을 의미했다.

만약 엘레닌이 강력한 토션 필드 효과와 지진활동성을 발생시킨다면, 그것이 더욱 가까워지면서 이들 활동이 확대될 것으로 예상된다. 엘레닌이 2011.9.26. 지구와 태양과 함께 정렬할 때 특히 그렇다. 그러나 만약 엘레닌이 하나 이상의 지적으로 안내 받는(통제되는) 우주선이라면, 그 때엔 그것이 지구에 접근하고 지나가면서 그것이 발생시키는 토션 필드가 달라질 지도 모른다.

It’s now less than four months before Elenin passes by the Earth’s orbit, around October 28, 2011, and its eventual influence is unknown and arousing considerable speculation. The timing of passing by the Earth, the end of the Mayan Calendar according to Dr Calleman, does offer the tantalizing possibility of Elenin being a harbinger of a New Age. Alternatively, Elenin may be a small comet that will have little to no impact as it passes near the Earth as NASA and many astronomers contend. Fortunately, we do not have long to find out what precisely Elenin’s influence will be.

2011.10.28.경에 엘레닌이 지구 궤도를 지나가는 것이 이제 4개월도 남지 않았고 그의 궁극적인 영향력은 알려지지 않아 추측이 무성하고 있다. 그것이 지구(궤도)를 통과하는 시기, 칼레만 박사에 의한 마여력의 끝은 엘레닌이 새로운 시대의 전조(조짐)라는 안타까운(감질나게 하는) 가능성을 제공한다. 그렇지 않으면, 엘레닌은, 나사와 많은 천문학자들이 주장하듯이, 지구 가까이 통과하면서 거의 충격을 주지 않을 하나의 작은 혜성일지도 모른다. 다행히, 우리는 정확히 엘레닌의 영향력이 무엇일지 알아내기 위해 긴 시간을 가지고 있지 않다.

* 읽은 후의 느낌을 표현해 봅시다. (이 글은 7.7일 올릴 것을 사정상 미리 올립니다) 

Further Reading:

• The Event and Comet Elenin
• Will Comet Elenin cause major earthquakes as it approaches Earth?
• Cyberspies or solar storms – the real threat to US electrical grid
• Electrical power grid to be blasted by 2012 solar storms

© Copyright 2011. Michael E. Salla. Exopolitics.org

[나풀나풀]

3대의 우주선이 태양계 밖에서부터 온다는것과는 무슨 관계가 있을까요? 2012년에 도착한다는데욤?

[카투피아]

흠..엘레닌..다른말로 니비루가 생각만큼 그렇게 위협적이진 않을거라는 얘기도 있던데요...

[슬기롭게]

엘레닌은 혜성 특유의 꼬리가 없다고 하네요.. 정녕 인위적인 행성인가 봅니다.. 다들 아시겠지만 달도 인위적인 위성이란 소문도 있지요~~

[無限]

달은 인위적이 위성 맞습니다 ^^

[ㄱㄱㅇ38]

달이 인위적인 위성이라뇨? ㅎㅎㅎ

[無限]

항시 태양과 달을 함께 묘사하곤 했던 고대에 처음엔 달에 대한 언급이 없었던 시대가 있었다는 점. 그 이후 아직까지도 한치의 오차 없이 일정 면만을 보여주며 지구를 공전하는 점. 지구상에서 보았을 때 태양과 크기가 완전히 일치하도록 거리를 두고 있는 점. 뭐 이 정도로만 해두지요...

[카투피아]

그리고 한가지더 추가하자면..달은 지구의 위성인데...태양계에 있는 다른 행성들과 비교했을때..지구의 크기에 비해서 위성인 달의 크기가 너무나 크다고 하더라구요.

[ㄱㄱㅇ38]

재밌네요..전 달을 매일 보고 있답니다.ㅎㅎ

[바로그거야]

저 역시 엘레닌은 행성 X 에 대해 언급되는 것을 덮기 위한 역 정보라 생각합니다.

[다산]

마야력이 태양의 흑점주기 즉 태양의 극지방과 적도 지방의 자전주기의 차와 합의 시간주기와 매우 밀접한 관련이 있습니다. 태양의 운동주기의 그 무엇 같군요...

[구산동]

아 뭐가뭔지 획갈리는군요... 그러나 공통은 시간이 얼마 안 남았다는거네요.. 나사의 경고도 그렇고 뭔일인가 있기는 있는데. X를 숨기자고 엘리닌을 꾸몄을것 같지는 않고, 그럼 X , 엘레닌 2개가 지구를 향해 온다는 건가요..