2014년 7월 14일 이후 스터디 일정 (댓글로 발제 신청)

[임근석]

우선 여름 방학에 공부할 책에 대한 발제 신청을 받습니다.

신청을 댓글로 달아주세요.

2번까지 발제 가능합니다. ^^

pdf는 카페 정보마당의 63번 글에 올려 두었습니다.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2014년 1월 13일 이후 스터디 일정
[1] Davidse and Lamiroy(2002), The Nominative & Accusative and their counterparts. 
Table of Contents
Preface ...................................................vii
Abbreviations .........................................viii

▶  7월 14일
1. Introduction    임근석
Kristin Davidse and Beatrice Lamiroy..........................1 ~ 14
2. Romance transitivity    임근석
Michael Herslund .......................................................15 ~ 39
3. Objects and quasi-objects: The constellation of the object in French   백은희
Ludo Melis .................................................................41 ~ 79

▶  7월 28일
4. A construction grammar approach to transitivity in Spanish  김현주
Nicole Delbecque ........................................................81 ~ 130  
5. Nominative and oblique in English: Reflexive clauses as a test case for distinct Agent?Patient models 송영숙
Kristin Davidse ............................................................131 ~ 173 

▶  8월 11일
6. Aspects of nominative and accusative in German 박혜승
Luk Draye ...................................................................175 ~ 200    
7. The source-path-goal schema and the accusative in interaction with the genitive in Polish 전문이
Zofia Kaleta.................................................................201 ~ 225
8. Objects, verbs and categories in the Cora lexicon        원광연
Eugene H. Casad...........................................................227 ~ 264

▶  8월 25일 
9. Ergativity and accusativity in Basque           박융배
R.L. Trask ..................................................................265 ~ 284
10. Ergative and accusative patterning in Warrwa             이민아
William B. McGregor ...................................................285 ~ 317
11. Constituent order and grammatical relations in Ewe in typological perspective   이성우
Felix K. Ameka ...........................................................319 ~ 352

[2] Rivas (2004), Clause Structure Typology, Tristram.

▶ 9월 15일 : 원광연, 이성우

1. The functional domain of clause construction ................ 15
2. The typology of clause structure .................... 37
2.1. Language type or linguistic type? ................... 37
2.2. A, P and S ............................ 45
2.3. Markedness theory ........................ 4 7
2.4. Devices for encoding core relations ................ 54

2.5. A survey oflinguistic types .................... 61
2.5.1. Nominative-accusative .................... 63
2.5.2. Ergative-absolutive .................... 70

▶ 9월 29일 :  (이의종, 송영숙)
2.5.3. Active-inactive ....................... 96
2.5.4. Minor types ....................... 132
2.5.5. Overview ........................ 152

3. Transitivity/the nominal hierarchy: the Janus-headed explanation for clause structure ........... 155
3.1. Transitivity ......................... 155

▶ 10월 6일 : (이민) , 박융배,  이민아 

3.2. Transitivity and alignment types ............ : ......... 193   이민

3.3. On the relationship between transitivity and volitionality ........ 241
3.4. The external basis of transitivity ................... 246
3.5. The debate of the arbitrariness/iconicity oflanguage ......... 251
3.6. The concept of basic relational type ................ 268
3.7. The nominal hierarchy ...................... 285
3 .8. The nominal hierarchy and alignment types: Direct-inverse systems ..... 302

▶ 10월 13일 :  정승철,  임근석

3.9. Accounting for tripartite, neutral and focus systems .......... 304
3. I 0. Transitivity and the nominal hierarchy in conspiracy: active systems .. 310
3.1 1. Transitivity and the nominal hierarchy in competition .......... 317
3.12. Recapitulation ........................ 325
4. A non-discrete approach to linguistic types ................ 329
4.1. The gradual manifestation of linguistic types .............. 329
4.2. Degrees of activity in the world's languages ............ 342
4.3. The weight of tradition ...................... 366

▶ 10월 20일 : Alexander Vovin 특강 관련 논저 읽기1 . 발제자 3명 내외 필요   ( 김현주, 송영숙, 박진호)

[A] Whitman,_The relationship between Japanese and Korean  총17쪽.
[B] Frellesvig, Whitman_The_Japanese-Korean_Vowel_Correspondences  총14쪽.

   -  박진호 : [A], [B], [C]의 3.1. 3.3.

   -  송영숙 : [C]의 1장

   - 김현주 : [C]의 2장
[C] Vovin, Koreo-Japonica (3.2는 빼거나 간략히)               총 240쪽.  (3.2. 제외시 대략 100쪽)

  INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 3
  CHAPTER 1: PROTO-KOREAN AND PROTO-JAPONIC
  RECONSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE COMPARISON
  OF THE TWO LANGUAGES.................................................................... 11
  CHAPTER 2: MORPHOLOGICAL COMPARISONS............................ 45
  CHAPTER 3: LEXICAL COMPARISONS .............................................. 92
  3.1 DOUBLETS IN WESTERN OLD JAPANESE.................................... 92
  3.2 WHITMAN’S LEXICAL COMPARISONS....................................... 94 (자습)
  3.3 STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF LEXICAL COMPARISONS
    AND CONCLUSION ......................................................................... 237
   REFERENCES........................................................................................... 241

▶ 10월 27일 : Alexander Vovin 특강 관련 논저 읽기2 . 임근석, 박진호, 박융배, 이민아, 이성우, 원광연

    장소: 서울대,  오전: 9시부터 오후 1시까지

[D] Vovin,, The end of Altaic controversy                  총 64쪽.

     -- 이성우, 원광연
[E] Dybo, Starostin, In Defense of the Comparative Method, or The End of the Vovin Controversy   총 122쪽.
  도입  p.119                               이민아
  1. Basic Vocabulary Or Morphology?  ................................... p. 124   이민아
  2. Phonetic Correspondence: Rigoruous Or Realistic?  ..........p. 138    임근석
  3. Semantics: same meanings or typological reliability? .......p. 157   임근석
  4. Convincing evidence: short lists or core etymologies? ......p. 165   임근석
  5. Internal vs. external reconstruction ..................................p. 176   박진호
  6. Philology or fantasy? .........................................................p. 197 박진호
  7. Ignorance or irrelevance? ..................................................p. 209  박진호
  8. Mistakes: crucial or insignificant? ......................................p. 227 박융배
  9. Religious belief or scientific research? ...............................p. 234  박융배
 10. 참고문헌 ............................................................................p. 246
[F] Vovin(2011)WHY JAPONIC IS NOT DEMONSTRABLY RELATED TO ‘ALTAIC’ OR KOREAN  ---총 8쪽  박융배

▶ 11월 1일: Alexander Vovin 특강 (서강대)  4시부터 5시 반까지

▶ 11월 10일 : 전지혜, 이민

5. In search of universal core relations .................. 371
5.1. The nature of grammatical relations in structuralist studies ........ 3 71
5.2. Subject and object as universals (again) .............. 374
5 .3. Are there universal grammatical relations? .............. 393
5 .4. A, P and S as universal core relations ................ .40 1
5.5. Cross-linguistic grammatical relations ................ 425
5.5.1. Protagonist and antagonist .................. 425
6. Overview ............................. 437

[3] Peterson(2007), Applicative Constructions, Oxford University Press. 총 307쪽.

▶ 11월 24일  :  박진호, 목정수

1 Introduction ...................1
2 Two Case Studies of Applicative Morphosyntax ....................5
3 Morphosyntactic and Semantic Variation in Applicative Constructions .....40

▶ 12월 8일 :   송영숙, 임근석

4 The Discourse Function of Applicative Constructions ...........................83
5 The Evolution of Applicative Constructions .............123

▶ 12월 22일 :  박은석, 임근석, 원광연

6 Structural Correlates of Applicative Constructions ...........172
7 Conclusion ................................231

[4] Wunderlich(2005), Towards a structural typology of verb classes. .................. 총 65쪽. 원광연

[전문이]

8월 11일 7번 하겠습니다.

[emmada7]

박융배, 10월 13일 3.3-3.5 하겠습니다

[이민아]

이민아, 10월 13일 3.6-3.8 하겠습니다

[원광연]

원광연 12월 8일 5장 하겠습니다.

[송영숙]

9월 29일에

2.5.3. (96쪽)부터 ~2.5.5.(154쪽)까지 이의종

3장(155쪽)부터 3.2.1.1. (206쪽)까지 송영숙 발제하겠습니다.
한 분 더 필요한데 발제 신청 부탁드립니다.

[박은석]

저는 12월 8일날 발제하겠습니다. The Discourse Function of Applicative Constructions 를 하면 되는 건가요?

[정승철(언어학과)]

저는10월 13일 3.9-3.12 발제하겠습니다.