Re: 폐는 무균상태가 아니다. 폐의 microbiome... 2024 nature!!

[문형철]

1. nature  
2. signal transduction and targeted therapy  
3. review articles  
4. article

Lung microbiome: new insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases

Download PDF

• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 17 January 2024

Lung microbiome: new insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases

• Ruomeng Li, 
• Jing Li & 
• Xikun Zhou 

Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy volume 9, Article number: 19 (2024) Cite this article

•  
•  
•  

Abstract

The lungs were long thought to be sterile until technical advances uncovered the presence of the lung microbial community. The microbiome of healthy lungs is mainly derived from the upper respiratory tract (URT) microbiome but also has its own characteristic flora. The selection mechanisms in the lung, including clearance by coughing, pulmonary macrophages, the oscillation of respiratory cilia, and bacterial inhibition by alveolar surfactant, keep the microbiome transient and mobile, which is different from the microbiome in other organs. The pulmonary bacteriome has been intensively studied recently, but relatively little research has focused on the mycobiome and virome. This up-to-date review retrospectively summarizes the lung microbiome’s history, composition, and function. We focus on the interaction of the lung microbiome with the oropharynx and gut microbiome and emphasize the role it plays in the innate and adaptive immune responses.

More importantly, we focus on multiple respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and pneumonia. The impact of the lung microbiome on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and lung cancer has also been comprehensively studied. Furthermore, by summarizing the therapeutic potential of the lung microbiome in lung diseases and examining the shortcomings of the field, we propose an outlook of the direction of lung microbiome research.

초록
폐는 기술적 진보로 폐 미생물 군집의 존재가 밝혀지기 전까지 오랫동안 무균 상태로 여겨져 왔습니다. 

건강한 폐의 미생물 군집은 

주로 상기도(URT) 미생물 군집에서 유래하지만, 

자체적인 특이적인 미생물 군집을 가지고 있습니다. 

폐 내의 선택 메커니즘은 

기침을 통한 제거, 폐 대식세포, 호흡기 섬모의 진동, 폐포 표면활성제에 의한 세균 억제 등을 포함하며, 

이는 미생물군집을 일시적이고 이동성 있게 유지합니다. 

The selection mechanisms in the lung, including clearance by coughing, pulmonary macrophages, the oscillation of respiratory cilia, and bacterial inhibition by alveolar surfactant, keep the microbiome transient and mobile, which is different from the microbiome in other organs.

이는 다른 장기와의 미생물군집과 차별됩니다. 

폐 세균군집은 최근 집중적으로 연구되었지만, 진균군집과 바이러스군집에 대한 연구는 상대적으로 부족합니다. 이 최신 리뷰는 폐 미생물군의 역사, 구성, 기능을 회고적으로 요약합니다. 우리는 폐 미생물군과 구인두 및 장 미생물군 간의 상호작용에 초점을 맞추며, 선천적 및 적응 면역 반응에서 扮演하는 역할을 강조합니다.

더욱 중요하게는

천식, 만성 폐쇄성 폐질환(COPD), 섬유화, 기관지 확장증, 폐렴 등

다양한 호흡기 질환에 초점을 맞춥니다.

폐 미생물군이 코로나19(COVID-19) 및 폐암에 미치는 영향도 포괄적으로 연구되었습니다.

또한 폐 질환에서의 폐 미생물군의 치료 잠재력을 요약하고

해당 분야의 한계점을 검토함으로써,

폐 미생물군 연구의 미래 방향을 제안합니다.

Similar content being viewed by others

The dynamic lung microbiome in health and disease

Article 16 November 2022

The lung–gut axis during viral respiratory infections: the impact of gut dysbiosis on secondary disease outcomes

Article Open access26 January 2021

Lung microbiome and cytokine profiles in different disease states of COPD: a cohort study

Article Open access07 April 2023

Introduction

With the Human Microbiome Project, the human body’s microbiome has gradually been unveiled.1 The microbiome includes all the microbes and their gene sequences (including homologous sequences) in a specific habitat at a specific time.2,3 It contains every organism, including not only bacteria but also archaea, fungi, and viruses. Various methods of obtaining DNA (metagenomics), RNA, metabolites, and proteins have been reported.4,5,6 In the past, the oropharyngeal microbiome and the gut microbiome have been studied with great enthusiasm, but the sterile environment of the lungs has been inherently perceived. The lung microbiome has thus gone unnoticed by the world. However, with the application of detection technologies, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the maturation of DNA sequencing,7,8 researchers began to pay attention to the lung microbiome. The lung microbiome is mostly composed of bacteria, fungi, and viruses.9,10 The relationship between the lung microbiome and the oropharyngeal and gut microbiomes, especially the gut-lung axis, has been intensively studied. The gut-lung axis is bidirectional and influences the progression of intestinal and lung diseases in terms of metabolism, immunity, and other aspects. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, the lung microbiome has an impact on lung development. Germ-free rodents tend to have reduced lung parenchyma and less developed alveoli.11 The dominant population and abundance of the microbiome differ in healthy and diseased lungs.

Even the composition and size of the lung microbiome change dynamically under the influences of different kinds of diseases. For instance, in patients with asthma and COPD, pathogenic Proteobacteria, especially Haemophilus, were increased, whereas in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, Candida albicans was increased.12,13,14 It follows that dysbiosis in the pulmonary microbiome, which imbalances the composition and size of the lung microbiome, affects disease occurrence, progression, and prognosis.15 Therefore, the lung microbiome can be considered an indicator of disease and diagnosis.

In addition, due to their geographical location, the lung microbiome is strongly related to the oropharyngeal and gut microbiomes. Numerous cases have confirmed the interaction between oral, gut, and lung microbes.16,17,18 If oral microorganisms enter the lungs and spread, they can directly form the lung microbial community and directly affect the growth of lung bacteria. However, this may lead to contamination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), causing limitations in the experimental results.19,20,21 To address this issue, sampling of the lung microbiome requires strict negative control methods16,22 and protective bronchial sampling techniques such as wax-sealed catheters.23

Since 2020, COVID-19 has broken out around the world, causing great damage to people’s health. Due to the constant changes in the coronavirus, it is clinically impossible to contain the infection and spread of the virus from the source. Researchers have provided insights into the link between the lung microbiome and this pandemic, and the results have been encouraging. By 2022, research on the lung microbiome will also gradually become linked to cancer. Changes in the lung microbiome are related to lung cancer occurrence, development, and prognosis. The lung microbiome composition differs between states, such that Streptococci and Staphylococci are more abundant in cancer patients, while the opposite is true in noncancerous subjects.24 Pulmonary microorganisms and their products affect clinical treatments, especially immunotherapy. Both immunotherapy and prognostic outcomes decreased with altered microbial abundance. Combining microbial therapy with lung cancer treatment may lead to an improvement in efficacy.

With technological progress, mysteries about the lung microbiome are gradually being unveiled. Studying microbial communities will further clarify the pathogenesis and development of many diseases. We will examine the history of the lung microbiome, the effects of the interactions between microbes and host factors, and explore new research directions.

소개

인간 미생물군집 프로젝트를 통해 인간의 미생물군집이 점차 밝혀지고 있습니다.1

미생물군집은 특정 시점과 환경에서 존재하는 모든 미생물과 그 유전자 서열(동일 서열 포함)을 포함합니다.2,3

이는 세균뿐만 아니라 고세균, 곰팡이, 바이러스 등 모든 생물을 포함합니다.

DNA(메타게노믹스), RNA, 대사산물, 단백질 등을 획득하는 다양한 방법이 보고되었습니다.4,5,6

과거에는 구인두 미생물군집과 장 미생물군집이 활발히 연구되었지만, 폐의 무균 환경은 본질적으로 인식되어 왔습니다.

따라서 폐 미생물군집은 세계적으로 주목받지 못했습니다.

그러나

폴리메라아제 연쇄 반응(PCR), 차세대 시퀀싱(NGS)과 같은 검출 기술의 적용과

DNA 시퀀싱 기술의 발전7,8으로 연구자들은

폐 미생물군집에 주목하기 시작했습니다.

폐 미생물군집은

주로 세균, 곰팡이, 바이러스로 구성되어 있습니다.9,10

폐 미생물군집과 구강인두 및 장 미생물군집 간의 관계,

특히 장-폐 축은 집중적으로 연구되어 왔습니다.

장-폐 축은 양방향으로 작용하며

대사, 면역 등 다양한 측면에서 장과 폐 질환의 진행에 영향을 미칩니다.

정확한 메커니즘은 아직 알려지지 않았지만,

폐 미생물군은 폐 발달에 영향을 미칩니다.

무균 쥐는 폐 실질 조직이 감소하고 폐포가 덜 발달된 경향을 보입니다.11

건강한 폐와 질병이 있는 폐에서 미생물군의 우점 종과 풍부도는 다릅니다.

폐 미생물군의 구성과 크기는

다양한 질병의 영향으로 동적으로 변화합니다.

예를 들어,

천식 및 COPD 환자는

병원성 프로테오박테리아,

특히 Haemophilus가 증가했으며,

낭성 섬유증(CF) 환자는

Candida albicans가 증가했습니다. 12,13,14

폐 미생물군의 불균형(dysbiosis)은

폐 미생물군의 구성과 크기를 교란시켜

질병의 발생, 진행, 예후에 영향을 미칩니다.15

따라서

폐 미생물군은

질병의 지표 및 진단 도구로 고려될 수 있습니다.

또한 지리적 위치로 인해 폐 미생물군은 구강인두 및 장 미생물군과 밀접하게 연관되어 있습니다. 구강, 장, 폐 미생물 간의 상호작용을 확인한 사례가 다수 보고되었습니다.16,17,18 구강 미생물이 폐로 침투하고 확산되면 폐 미생물 군집을 직접 형성하고 폐 세균의 성장에 직접적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 그러나 이는 기관지 알베올라 세척액(BALF)의 오염을 초래할 수 있어 실험 결과에 제한을 초래할 수 있습니다.19,20,21 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 폐 미생물군집 채취에는 엄격한 음성 대조군 방법16,22 및 왁스 밀봉 카테터와 같은 보호적 기관지 채취 기술이 필요합니다.23

2020년부터 코로나19가 전 세계적으로 확산되며 인간의 건강에 큰 피해를 입혔습니다. 코로나바이러스의 지속적인 변이로 인해 감염과 확산을 원천에서 차단하는 것은 임상적으로 불가능합니다. 연구자들은 폐 미생물군집과 이 팬데믹 간의 연관성에 대한 통찰을 제공했으며, 결과는 격려할 만합니다. 2022년까지 폐 미생물군집 연구는 점차 암과도 연결될 것입니다.

폐 미생물군집의 변화는

폐암의 발생, 진행, 예후와 관련이 있습니다.

폐 미생물군집의 구성은 상태에 따라 다르며,

Streptococci와 Staphylococci는 암 환자에게 더 많이 존재하며,

비암 환자에게는 반대 현상이 관찰됩니다.24

폐 미생물과 그 산물은 임상 치료,

특히 면역 치료에 영향을 미칩니다.

미생물 풍부도의 변화는

면역 치료와 예후 결과 모두를 감소시켰습니다.

미생물 치료를 폐암 치료와 결합하면

효능 개선으로 이어질 수 있습니다.

기술의 발전으로 폐 미생물군집에 대한 미스터리가 점차 밝혀지고 있습니다. 미생물 군집을 연구하는 것은 많은 질병의 병인 메커니즘과 진행 과정을 더욱 명확히 할 것입니다. 우리는 폐 미생물군집의 역사, 미생물과 호스트 요인 간의 상호작용의 영향, 그리고 새로운 연구 방향을 탐구할 것입니다.

History of the lung microbiome

The study of the lung microbiome is still in its infancy compared to that of the microbiomes of other parts of the body. In early years, scientists began investigating the effect of colonization on pulmonary allergy symptoms.25 However, most of the subsequent studies focused on the functions of the gut microbiome, fecal microbiome, etc., in the lung.26 It was evident that the lungs were in a sterile state, which was the perception of most people at that time. In 2010, researchers successively determined the composition of the airway microbiota; thus, the microbiome in the respiratory system came to light.27 With further advances in detection technology, scientists have applied computed tomography (CT) scans, PCR, and 16S rRNA sequencing to investigate the lung microbiome.8,28 

Since 2011, the relationship between various lung diseases and microbiomes has been gradually explored. The presence of a microbiome in COPD patients has been found.3 At the same time, Foder et al. found that adult CF is closely related to the microbiome.29 Not only are the survival and prognosis of patients with COPD related to lung microorganisms,30 but pneumonia31 and bronchial diseases32,33 also involve an imbalance in pulmonary microorganisms. In 2014, researchers focused on the relationship between lung transplantation and the microbiome, showing that the impact of the lung microbiome on innate and adaptive immune responses is beginning to be explored.34,35 With the further elaboration of the concept of the “microbiome”, the focus is no longer limited to bacterial communities but also to fungal and viral communities.

For example, Nguyen et al. uncovered the impact and significance of pulmonary fungal communities on respiratory diseases.36 In 2016, Segal et al. linked the lung microbiome to HIV.37 After that, with the maturation of molecular diagnostic techniques, one could precisely characterize and analyze the distribution of the lung microbiome. Relationships between pneumonia, COPD, CF, and microorganisms were further investigated. At the same time, new research areas, such as those involving tuberculosis and sepsis, have been developed.16,38 In 2016, the association between intrinsic immunity and microorganisms in the body was explored.39 The same lung microbiome is involved in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.40,41,42 In 2019, COVID-19 spread worldwide, and the relationship between coronaviruses and microorganisms also became a hot topic.43 Currently, lung cancer has become an emerging area of microbiome research; its development, metastasis, and prognosis are microbiome-related (Fig. 1). Therefore, the lung microbiome has the potential to be a diagnostic and therapeutic target for cancer, which will be further investigated in the future.

폐 미생물군집의 역사

폐 미생물군의 연구는 신체 다른 부위의 미생물군 연구에 비해 아직 초기 단계에 있습니다. 초기에는 과학자들이 미생물 군집이 폐 알레르기 증상에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 시작했습니다.25 그러나 이후 대부분의 연구는 폐 내 장 미생물군, 분변 미생물군 등의 기능에 초점을 맞췄습니다.26 당시 대부분의 사람들은 폐가 무균 상태라는 인식을 가지고 있었으며, 이는 명확히 입증되었습니다. 2010년 연구자들은 기도의 미생물군집 구성을 차례로 규명함으로써 호흡기 시스템 내 미생물군이 밝혀졌습니다.27 검출 기술의 추가 발전으로 과학자들은 컴퓨터 단층촬영(CT) 스캔, PCR, 16S rRNA 시퀀싱을 활용해 폐 미생물군을 연구하기 시작했습니다.8,28

2011년부터

다양한 폐 질환과 미생물군집 간의 관계가

점차 탐구되었습니다.

COPD 환자에게

미생물군집이 존재한다는 것이 발견되었습니다.3

동시에 Foder 등 연구진은 성인 CF가 미생물군집과 밀접하게 관련되어 있음을 발견했습니다.29 COPD 환자의 생존율과 예후는 폐 미생물과 관련이 있을 뿐만 아니라,30 폐렴31 및 기관지 질환32,33 역시 폐 미생물의 불균형과 연관되어 있습니다.

2014년 연구자들은

폐 이식과 미생물군집의 관계를 집중적으로 연구했으며,

폐 미생물군집이 선천적 및 적응성 면역 반응에 미치는 영향이 점차 탐구되기 시작했습니다.34,35

미생물군집 개념이 더욱 구체화되면서 연구 초점은

세균 군집에 국한되지 않고

곰팡이와 바이러스 군집으로도 확대되었습니다.

예를 들어, Nguyen 등(Nguyen et al.)은 폐 곰팡이 공동체가 호흡기 질환에 미치는 영향과 중요성을 밝혀냈습니다.36 2016년 Segal 등(Segal et al.)은 폐 미생물군집과 HIV의 연관성을 규명했습니다.37 이후 분자 진단 기술의 발전으로 폐 미생물군집의 분포를 정확히 특성화하고 분석할 수 있게 되었습니다. 폐렴, COPD, CF와 미생물 간의 관계가 추가로 조사되었습니다. 동시에 결핵과 패혈증과 관련된 새로운 연구 분야가 개발되었습니다.16,38 2016년에는 신체 내 내인성 면역과 미생물 간의 연관성이 탐구되었습니다.39 동일한 폐 미생물군은 급성 호흡 곤란 증후군(ARDS)과 혈액 줄기 세포 이식에도 관여합니다. 40,41,42 2019년 코로나19가 전 세계로 확산되면서 코로나바이러스와 미생물 간의 관계도 주요 연구 주제로 부상했습니다.43

현재 폐암은

미생물군 연구의 신흥 분야로 부상했으며,

그 발생, 전이, 예후는 미생물군과 관련이 있습니다(그림 1).

따라서

폐 미생물군은 암의 진단 및 치료 표적으로서의 잠재력을 지니며,

향후 추가 연구가 진행될 것입니다.

Fig. 1

History of the lung microbiome. With the advancement of technology, studies on the lung microbiome were progressively funded and completed. In early years, the lung was believed to be a sterile environment; thus, its functions were ignored. In 2010, the composition of the lung microbiome, especially the bacteriome, was discovered, showing that the lung has its own microbiota. The relationship between the lung microbiome and pulmonary diseases has been uncovered. For example, COPD, CF, pneumonia, and bronchial disease were found to be closely associated with the lung microbiome in 2011 and 2012. With the study of lung transplantation, immunity, and the lung microbiome were shown to have a strong relationship. At the same time, scientists have paid attention to the mycobiome and virome, completing the composition of the lung microbiome. In 2016, the function of the lung microbiome in the immune response, especially the innate immune response, was intensively studied. From the end of 2019 to the present, researchers have found important connections to COVID-19 and lung cancer. The lung microbiome also plays an active role in these processes, and more studies are needed. (Figures are created with Servier Medical Art and exported under a paid subscription.)

폐 미생물군집의 역사. 

기술의 발전에 따라 폐 미생물군집에 대한 연구가 점차적으로 지원되고 완료되었습니다. 초기에는 폐가 무균 환경으로 여겨졌기 때문에 그 기능은 무시되었습니다. 2010년, 폐 미생물군집의 구성, 특히 세균군집이 발견되면서 폐가 자체 미생물군집을 가지고 있다는 것이 밝혀졌습니다. 폐 미생물군집과 폐 질환 간의 관계가 밝혀지기 시작했습니다. 예를 들어, 2011년과 2012년에 COPD, CF, 폐렴, 기관지 질환이 폐 미생물군집과 밀접하게 연관되어 있다는 것이 밝혀졌습니다. 폐 이식 연구를 통해 면역 체계와 폐 미생물군집 간의 강한 연관성이 입증되었습니다. 동시에 과학자들은 마이코바이옴과 바이러스옴에 주목해 폐 미생물군집의 구성을 완성했습니다. 2016년에는 폐 미생물군의 면역 반응, 특히 선천성 면역 반응에서의 기능이 집중적으로 연구되었습니다. 2019년 말부터 현재까지 연구자들은 코로나19와 폐암과의 중요한 연관성을 발견했습니다. 폐 미생물군은 이러한 과정에서도 활발한 역할을 하며, 추가 연구가 필요합니다. (그림은 Servier Medical Art를 사용하여 생성되었으며 유료 구독을 통해 수출되었습니다.) 

Full size image

The composition of a healthy lung microbiome

The microbiome is the culmination of all the microbes and their gene sequences (including homologous sequences) in a specific habitat at a specific time.44 Thus, to investigate the microbiome of the lung, we should investigate the bacterial, fungal, and viral groups (called the “mycobiome” and “virome”) that exist in the lung. Since the composition and dominant community of the lung microbiome vary dynamically with the state of the lung, different diseases may result in different microbial communities. In this section, we focus on the healthy lung microbiome and investigate the microbiome’s specific composition, structure, and functions in terms of bacteria, fungi, and viruses (Fig. 2). Thus allowing us to summarize the microbiological characteristics of healthy lungs for the early detection of respiratory diseases.

건강한 폐 미생물군집의 구성

미생물군집은 특정 시점과 환경에서 존재하는 모든 미생물과 그 유전자 서열(동일한 서열을 가진 유전자 포함)의 총합입니다.44 따라서 폐의 미생물군집을 연구하려면 폐에 존재하는 세균, 곰팡이, 바이러스 그룹(각각 “mycobiome”과 “virome”이라고 불림)을 조사해야 합니다. 폐 미생물군의 구성과 우점 군집은 폐의 상태에 따라 동적으로 변동되기 때문에, 다양한 질병이 서로 다른 미생물 군집을 유발할 수 있습니다. 본 절에서는 건강한 폐 미생물군에 초점을 맞춰 세균, 곰팡이, 바이러스 측면에서 미생물군의 특정 구성, 구조, 기능을 조사합니다(그림 2). 이를 통해 호흡기 질환의 조기 진단에 활용할 수 있는 건강한 폐의 미생물학적 특성을 요약할 수 있습니다.

Fig. 2

The composition of the healthy lung microbiome. Compared to the rich communities of the intestinal and oropharyngeal microbiomes, the lung microbiome contains fewer resident microorganisms, but this does not mean that it is homogeneous. The lung microbiome is composed of the bacteriome, mycobiome, and virome. Among the bacteriome, Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Prevotella are the most common genera, while Haemophilus are unique to the lung as resident inhabitants and are rare in other microbiomes. The mycobiome is less numerous, with Candida dominating, followed by Saccharomyces and Penicillium. Phages, on the other hand, dominate the virome in addition to the presence of a small number of respiratory viruses. The lung microbiome has a unique mobility characteristic, which is created by the clearance mechanisms of the respiratory system. Coughing, the movement of respiratory cilia, phagocytosis by macrophages, and alveolar surfactants comprise the clearance mechanisms of the respiratory system, conferring selectivity to the lung microbiome. (Figures are created with Servier Medical Art and exported under a paid subscription.)

건강한 폐 미생물군집의 구성.

장과 구인두 미생물군집의 풍부한 미생물 군집과 비교할 때,

폐 미생물군집은 거주하는 미생물의 수가 적지만,

이는 폐 미생물군집이 균일하다는 의미는 아닙니다.

폐 미생물군집은

세균군집(bacteriome),

곰팡이군집(mycobiome),

바이러스군집(virome)으로 구성되어 있습니다.

박테리오메 중에서는

Streptococcus, Veillonella, Prevotella가 가장 흔한 속이며,

Haemophilus는 폐에 특이적으로 거주하는 미생물로 다른 미생물군집에서는 드뭅니다.

마이코비오메는 상대적으로 적으며,

Candida가 주를 이루고

그 다음으로 Saccharomyces와 Penicillium이 이어집니다.

반면,

바이러스오메는

소수의 호흡기 바이러스와 함께 파지(phage)가 주를 이룹니다.

폐 미생물군은 호흡기 시스템의 청소 메커니즘에 의해

생성된 독특한 이동성을 특징으로 합니다.

기침,

호흡기 섬모의 운동,

대식세포에 의한 식작용,

폐포 표면활성제 등이 호흡기 시스템의 청소 메커니즘을 구성하며,

이는 폐 미생물군에 선택성을 부여합니다. (그림은 Servier Medical Art를 사용하여 생성되었으며 유료 구독을 통해 수출되었습니다.)

Bacteria (bacteriome)

The core lung microbiome includes Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Proteus, Clostridium, Haemophilus, Veillonella, and Porphyromonas.3,27,45 Most of the flora are aerobic or parthenogenetic anaerobic, except for Clostridium, Veillonella, and Porphyromonas, which are specialized anaerobes. There is a part of researchers who think human-associated microorganisms cannot be cultivated in the laboratory. However, a significant percentage of the bacteria and archaea in our microbiota have been cultured.46 As laboratory techniques have matured, more species have been successfully cultured, which suggests that microorganisms are not “unculturable“.47 Among these bacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most common phyla, and Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Veillonella are the most common genera.48 Research has indicated that the habitant of the lung microbiome is not permanent but changes dynamically according to the immune response of the body and the migratory movements of URT.27,49 Consequently, in contrast to sites such as the skin and gut, which have robust and self-sustaining microbiomes, the lung microbiome may migrate from adjacent sites such as the oropharynx and the URT. The continuous migration of microorganisms between these sites implies that the lung microbiome is in a constant state of flux, with new species being introduced or removed randomly.48,50,51

Based on this conjecture, traditional studies have suggested that the species of lung microbes are similar to those in the oropharynx.3,52 This may be because the oropharynx and lungs are connected by the URT. However, although the composition of the two regions was similar, the proportions of microbial populations were different, and even the lungs had a unique genus. Comparing BALF and oral fluids in a healthy population shows that the lung microbiome contained different proportions of Ralstonia, Bosea, Haemophilus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Methylobacterium than the oropharynx. Ralstonia and Bosea are overrepresented, while Haemophilus and Enterobacteriaceae are not proportionally abundant in the oropharynx.53 In summary, the lung microbiome also has a long-term and self-sustaining bacterial population. After extensive research, we know that the gut microbiota plays a dominant role in regulating gut mucosa development and digestive system maturation.54,55,56 The eubiosis of the lung microbiome provides a clean and safe environment by participating in the immune response and preventing inflammation. By analogy, scientists speculate that the lung microbiota also has the same function of regulating the lung environment and immunity. Individuals lacking lung-specific microbial communities exhibit T helper 17 (Th17)/neutrophil mucosal immune features and have weaker innate immune function, suggesting a potential immunomodulatory mechanism.57 In the experiments of Dickson et al., the community composition and bacterial diversity of mouse lungs were negatively correlated with the levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and IL-4, showing the influence of the pulmonary bacteriome on inflammation and immunity.58

세균 (세균군)

폐의 핵심 미생물군에는 Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Proteus, Clostridium, Haemophilus, Veillonella, 및 Porphyromonas가 포함됩니다.3,27,45 대부분의 미생물은 호기성 또는 무성생식성 혐기성 미생물이며, Clostridium, Veillonella, 및 Porphyromonas는 특수한 혐기성 미생물입니다.

일부 연구자들은 인간과 관련된 미생물이 실험실에서 배양될 수 없다고 주장합니다. 그러나 우리 미생물군집에 존재하는 세균과 고세균의 상당 부분이 배양되었습니다.46 실험실 기술이 발전함에 따라 더 많은 종이 성공적으로 배양되었으며, 이는 미생물이 “배양 불가능”하지 않음을 시사합니다.47 이 중 Firmicutes와 Bacteroidetes가 가장 흔한 문이며, Streptococcus, Prevotella, 및 Veillonella가 가장 흔한 속입니다. 48 연구 결과, 폐 미생물군의 구성은 영구적이지 않고 신체 면역 반응과 상기도(URT)의 이동에 따라 동적으로 변화합니다.27,49 따라서 피부나 장과 같은 견고하고 자체 유지되는 미생물군과 달리, 폐 미생물군은 구인두나 상기도와 같은 인접 부위에서 이동할 수 있습니다. 이들 부위 간의 미생물 이동은 폐 미생물군이 새로운 종이 무작위로 도입되거나 제거되는 지속적인 변화 상태에 있음을 의미합니다.48,50,51

이 가설에 따라 전통적인 연구들은 폐 미생물의 종이 구인두와 유사하다고 제안했습니다.3,52 이는 구인두와 폐가 URT로 연결되어 있기 때문일 수 있습니다. 그러나 두 지역의 구성은 유사했지만 미생물 군집의 비율은 달랐으며, 폐에는 고유한 속이 존재했습니다. 건강한 인구에서 BALF와 구강 액체를 비교한 결과, 폐 미생물군집은 구인두와 달리 Ralstonia, Bosea, Haemophilus, Enterobacteriaceae, Methylobacterium의 비율이 달랐습니다. Ralstonia와 Bosea는 과대 표현되어 있으며, Haemophilus와 Enterobacteriaceae는 구인두에서 비례적으로 풍부하지 않습니다.53

요약하면,

폐 미생물군집도 장기적이고 자체 유지되는

세균 군집을 가지고 있습니다.

광범위한 연구를 통해

장 미생물군이 장 점막 발달과 소화계 성숙을 조절하는 데

주요 역할을 한다는 것이 알려져 있습니다.54,55,56

폐 미생물군의 균형 상태(eubiosis)는

면역 반응에 참여하고 염증을 예방함으로써 깨끗하고

안전한 환경을 제공합니다.

유추적으로, 과학자들은 폐 미생물군집도 폐 환경과 면역 조절 기능을 수행한다고 추측합니다.

폐 특이적 미생물군집이 결여된 개인은

T helper 17 (Th17)/중성구 점막 면역 특성을 보이고

선천적 면역 기능이 약화되어 잠재적인 면역 조절 메커니즘을 시사합니다. 57

Dickson 등(et al.)의 실험에서 쥐의 폐 미생물군집 구성과 세균 다양성은

인터루킨-1α(IL-1α)와 IL-4를 포함한 염증성 사이토카인 수준과 음의 상관관계를 보였으며,

이는 폐 미생물군집이 염증과 면역에 미치는 영향을 보여줍니다.58

Fungi (mycobiome)

Fungal analysis usually uses targeted internal transcribed spacer or 18S rRNA genes or shotgun macrogenome sequencing.59 Although fungi have been emphasized in recent years,60,61 the low fungal biomass in the lungs, the small number of fungal taxa, the difficulty in extracting DNA from fungi, the bias of 18S rRNA gene amplification, and the inconsistency in naming make fungal database annotation unsatisfactory.62,63,64 Compared to the large family of bacteria, the presence and role of fungi are often overlooked.

According to the available studies, the fungal species in healthy lungs are diverse and differ from those in diseased lungs.29,65,66 Ascomycetes and Streptomyces are the most common taxa, followed by Candida, Saccharomyces, Penicillium, Dictyostelium, and Fusarium.67,68 Among them, Candida spp. predominate.66,69,70 In addition, Aspergillus, Davidiellaceae, and Eurotium are also present.69

Unlike bacteria that are directly involved in regulating the pulmonary environment and the organism’s immune response, scientists have found that the lung mycobiome seems to be a cofactor in the host immune response and inflammation.63 Accordingly, the pulmonary mycobiome may contribute to decreased lung function and disease progression.71,72 Furthermore, the fungal group influences bacterial behavior through different interactions, resulting in positive or negative interactions between members of the lung microbiome.73,74,75 Specifically, fungi and bacteria can produce biofilm structures that protect fungi and/or bacteria from dehydration, drugs, and immunocyte attack. This leads to the development of strains that are multidrug-resistant to antimicrobial agents and capable of spreading.76,77

Currently, studies at this stage have begun to provide a promising understanding of fungal-bacterial interactions and their role in the health of organisms and diseases. Recent studies have shown a strong relationship between fungi and cancers. Fungi, although few in number, are preval‎ent in all major human cancers, and specific fungal community types predict the prognosis of cancers.78 In colon cancer, Candida not only predicts advanced disease and metastasis but is also associated with diminished cell adhesion. Moreover, the interactions between the bacteriome and mycobiome have been partially investigated. For example, Candida was positively correlated with Lactobacillus but inversely correlated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Lactobacillus has been shown to affect the attachment of H. pylori and Candida albicans to epithelial cells, which may play a role in their colonization.79 Fungi are also potential pathogens in the lung, although they seem to play a symbiotic role most of the time; thus, analysis of the mycobiome is of clinical value.80,81 By determining the respiratory characteristics of specific fungal groups that can prevent or treat disease, fungal communities may become a target for research in the respiratory system.65

균류 (미생물군집)

균류 분석은 일반적으로 표적 내전사 스페이서 또는 18S rRNA 유전자 또는 샷건 매크로게놈 시퀀싱을 사용합니다. 59 최근 몇 년간 곰팡이가 강조되어 왔지만,60,61 폐 내 곰팡이 생물량 저하, 곰팡이 분류군 수의 적음, 곰팡이에서 DNA 추출의 어려움, 18S rRNA 유전자 증폭의 편향성, 명명 일관성 부족 등으로 인해 곰팡이 데이터베이스 주석화가 불충분합니다.62,63,64 세균의 대규모 분류군에 비해 곰팡이의 존재와 역할은 종종 간과됩니다.

기존 연구에 따르면 건강한 폐의 곰팡이 종은 다양하며 질병이 있는 폐의 곰팡이와 다릅니다.29,65,66 Ascomycetes와 Streptomyces가 가장 흔한 분류군이며, 그 다음으로 Candida, Saccharomyces, Penicillium, Dictyostelium, Fusarium이 있습니다.67,68 이 중 Candida spp.가 우세합니다. 66,69,70 또한 Aspergillus, Davidiellaceae, 및 Eurotium도 존재합니다.69

박테리아와 달리 폐 환경과 유기체의 면역 반응을 직접 조절하는 데 관여하지 않는 곰팡이는 호스트의 면역 반응과 염증에 대한 보조 인자로 작용하는 것으로 밝혀졌습니다.63 따라서 폐 미생물군은 폐 기능 저하와 질병 진행에 기여할 수 있습니다. 71,72 또한, 곰팡이 그룹은 다양한 상호작용을 통해 세균의 행동에 영향을 미치며, 이는 폐 미생물군집 내 구성원 간의 긍정적 또는 부정적 상호작용으로 이어집니다.73,74,75 구체적으로, 곰팡이와 세균은 곰팡이와/또는 세균을 탈수, 약물, 면역 세포 공격으로부터 보호하는 생물막 구조를 생성할 수 있습니다. 이는 항생제에 다제내성을 가진 균주와 확산 능력이 있는 균주의 발달로 이어집니다.76,77

현재 이 단계의 연구는 곰팡이와 세균의 상호작용 및 생물체 건강과 질병에 미치는 역할에 대한 유망한 이해를 제공하기 시작했습니다. 최근 연구는 곰팡이와 암 사이의 강한 연관성을 보여주었습니다. 곰팡이는 수는 적지만 모든 주요 인간 암에서 널리 분포하며, 특정 곰팡이 군집 유형은 암의 예후를 예측합니다.78 대장암에서 Candida는 진행된 질환과 전이를 예측할 뿐만 아니라 세포 부착 감소와도 연관되어 있습니다. 또한 세균군과 곰팡이군 간의 상호작용은 부분적으로 조사되었습니다. 예를 들어, Candida는 Lactobacillus와 양의 상관관계를 보였지만 Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)와는 음의 상관관계를 보였습니다. Lactobacillus는 H. pylori와 Candida albicans가 상피 세포에 부착되는 것을 영향을 미치며, 이는 그들의 정착에 역할을 할 수 있습니다. 79

곰팡이는 폐에서 잠재적 병원체로 작용하지만

대부분 공생적 역할을 하는 것으로 보이며,

따라서 마이코바이옴 분석은 임상적 가치를 지닙니다.80,81

특정 곰팡이 그룹의 호흡기 특성을 통해 질병을 예방하거나 치료할 수 있는 경우,

곰팡이 군집은 호흡기 연구의 대상으로 될 수 있습니다.65

Virus (virome)

The virome can be defined as the sum of all viruses discovered in each environment. The human virome includes all prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses that exist in the human body. They vary according to position because each location creates a distinct microenvironment. The absence of any conserved regions in viruses similar to bacterial 16S or fungal 18S genes has led to stagnation in studies of the virulence group. With technological developments, scientists have used NGS to effectively probe the composition of the human virome. In humans, the number of viral particles differs depending on the body part.82 For example, there are 109 particles/g of virus in gut contents and 108 particles/ml in the oropharynx, nasal cavity, pharynx, and saliva.83,84 However, viral particles in the lungs are less abundant than that in the intestine and oropharynx.

Most viral sequences are grouped into the following three main families: Paramyxoviridae, Picornaviridae, and Orthomyxoviridae.85 Alpha papillomavirus,86 KI polyomavirus, WU polyomavirus, and Adenoviridae Masto adenovirus87 are present in the respiratory tract of healthy humans. In addition, a newly identified family of viruses, named Redondoviridae for their ring-shaped genome, was identified in the macrogenome sequence of the respiratory tract of healthy and diseased patients.85,88 A study of respiratory viromes showed lower viral community complexity in healthy individuals.89 For example, in healthy children, the virome consists mainly of members of Anapoviridae, with a smaller proportion of human herpesvirus (HHV). In disease-free lungs, the Anapoviridae family is the predominant eukaryotic virus, with the occasional detection of herpesviruses, papillomaviruses, retroviruses, and other respiratory viruses.90

Both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals carry a variety of eukaryotic viruses. They can regulate health and disease and affect the physiological state of hosts.91,92,93 For example, in the BALF of patients receiving lung transplants, different families of Anelloviridae formed nearly 70% of the lung virome, and they were considered pathogenic.94 In addition, different viruses cause diseases with varying effects on lung metabolism.95 The virome functions differently in the healthy lung than in the disease state, or even the opposite. Studies suggest that viral latency may prove advantageous to the host, as it creates an upregulated basal immune status to control subsequent bacterial infection.96,97 Through long-term viral latency, the body continues to produce IFN-γ and activate macrophages. Hence, mice latently infected with murine herpesvirus are resistant to infection by Listeria monocytogenes.98

Experts have found that phages are plentiful in the lungs, and phage populations vary with the number of bacteria in the host.86 Moreover, some believe that a resident core group of 19 phages is present in the human respiratory tract.86,99 Phages have a strong and direct influence on bacterial structure. Bacteria can use their prophages to kill associated bacteria or to avoid the excessive growth of certain bacteria using the same ecological niche, which helps bacteria survive and reproduce. At this stage, most of the research has been done on DNA viruses and less on RNA viruses and retroviruses, and our exploration of the pulmonary virome is not yet complete. Future studies may concentrate on the collaboration of viruses with other microorganisms in the lung microbiome. It may unravel the mystery of disease action by clarifying the mechanisms of influence between different organisms.

바이러스 (바이러스체)

바이러스체는 각 환경에서 발견된 모든 바이러스의 총합으로 정의됩니다. 인간 바이러스체는 인체에 존재하는 모든 원핵생물 및 진핵생물 바이러스를 포함합니다. 각 위치에 따라 미세환경이 다르기 때문에 위치에 따라 차이가 있습니다. 박테리아의 16S 유전자나 곰팡이의 18S 유전자와 유사한 보존된 영역이 바이러스에 존재하지 않아 독성 그룹 연구가 정체되었습니다. 기술 발전으로 과학자들은 NGS를 활용해 인간 바이러스체의 구성 분석을 효과적으로 수행해 왔습니다. 인간에서 바이러스 입자의 수는 신체 부위에 따라 다릅니다.82 예를 들어, 장 내용물에는 10⁹ 입자/g의 바이러스가 있으며, 구인두, 비강, 인두, 타액에는 10⁸ 입자/ml가 있습니다.83,84 그러나 폐의 바이러스 입자는 장과 구인두보다 적습니다.

대부분의 바이러스 시퀀스는 다음과 같은 세 가지 주요 가족으로 분류됩니다: Paramyxoviridae, Picornaviridae, 및 Orthomyxoviridae.85 Alpha papillomavirus,86 KI polyomavirus, WU polyomavirus, 및 Adenoviridae Masto adenovirus87는 건강한 인간의 호흡기에서 발견됩니다. 또한, 고리 모양의 유전체를 특징으로 하는 새로운 바이러스 가족인 Redondoviridae가 건강한 환자와 질병 환자의 호흡기 대유전체 시퀀스에서 발견되었습니다.85,88 호흡기 바이러스군 연구 결과, 건강한 개인에서 바이러스 군집의 복잡성이 낮게 나타났습니다.89 예를 들어, 건강한 어린이의 바이러스군은 주로 Anapoviridae 속의 바이러스로 구성되며, 인간 헤르페스 바이러스(HHV)의 비율은 상대적으로 낮습니다. 질병이 없는 폐에서는 Anapoviridae 가족이 주요 진핵 바이러스로, 헤르페스바이러스, 파필로마바이러스, 레트로바이러스 및 기타 호흡기 바이러스가 간혹 검출됩니다.90

증상이 있는 사람과 증상이 없는 사람 모두 다양한 진핵 바이러스를 보유하고 있습니다. 이들은 건강과 질병을 조절하고 호스트의 생리적 상태에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.91,92,93 예를 들어, 폐 이식 환자의 BALF에서 Anelloviridae 속의 다양한 가족이 폐 바이러스체의 약 70%를 차지했으며, 이들은 병원성으로 간주되었습니다.94 또한 다양한 바이러스는 폐 대사 과정에 서로 다른 영향을 미치는 질병을 유발합니다.95 건강한 폐와 질병 상태에서 바이러스체는 다르게 기능하며, 심지어 반대일 수도 있습니다. 연구 결과, 바이러스 잠복기가 호스트에게 유리한 것으로 나타났습니다. 이는 후속 세균 감염을 통제하기 위해 기초 면역 상태를 활성화하기 때문입니다.96,97 장기적인 바이러스 잠복기 동안 신체는 IFN-γ를 지속적으로 생성하고 대식세포를 활성화합니다. 따라서 쥐에 잠복 감염된 쥐 헤르페스바이러스는 Listeria monocytogenes 감염에 저항성을 보입니다.98

전문가들은 폐에 파지가 풍부하며, 파지 군집은 호스트의 세균 수에 따라 변동된다는 것을 발견했습니다.86 또한 일부 연구자들은 인간 호흡기 계통에 19종의 파지로 구성된 상주 핵심 그룹이 존재한다고 믿습니다.86,99 파지는 세균 구조에 강한 직접적인 영향을 미칩니다. 박테리아는 프로파지를 이용해 연관된 박테리아를 죽이거나 동일한 생태적 틈새를 공유하는 특정 박테리아의 과도한 증식을 방지함으로써 생존과 번식을 돕습니다. 현재까지 대부분의 연구는 DNA 바이러스에 초점을 맞췄으며, RNA 바이러스와 레트로바이러스에 대한 연구는 상대적으로 부족하며, 폐 바이러스체에 대한 탐구는 아직 완료되지 않았습니다. 미래 연구는 폐 미생물군집 내 바이러스와 다른 미생물 간의 협력을 집중적으로 탐구할 수 있습니다. 이는 서로 다른 유기체 간의 영향 메커니즘을 명확히 함으로써 질병 작용의 비밀을 풀어낼 수 있을 것입니다.

The connections of the lung microbiome

Oropharyngeal and gut microbes were studied for a long time before lung microbes were discovered.100,101 As mentioned above, unlike the lung microbiome, the oropharyngeal and gut microbiomes are stable and robust, with a profound impact on the physiological and pathological state of the organism. Researchers first speculated that the lung microbiome was the same as the oropharyngeal microbiome due to its location. As study progressed, scientists corrected their view, acknowledging the similarities but also pointing out the differences between these two anatomical sites. However, it is undeniable that the oropharyngeal microbiome has an impact on the production, maintenance, and changes in the pulmonary microbial community. Oral health has been shown to be associated with the risk of developing respiratory diseases.

Gastrointestinal microorganisms have long been valued for their high complexity and abundance. They not only regulate the state of a healthy organism but are also closely related to different kinds of diseases. Recently, researchers have made the novel discovery that the effects of the gastrointestinal microbiome on the lungs, such as protection against lung disease, may be related to the original inhabitants of the lungs. The lung microbiome also greatly impacts the gut and its microbial communities. In the following sections, we will investigate the association among the oropharyngeal microbiome, the gut microbiome, and the lung microbiome in terms of origin, composition, and function (Fig. 3).

폐 미생물군집의 연결성

폐 미생물군집이 발견되기 전까지 구인두와 장 미생물군집은 오랫동안 연구되어 왔습니다.100,101 위에서 언급된 바와 같이, 폐 미생물군집과 달리 구인두와 장 미생물군집은 안정적이고 강건하며, 유기체의 생리적 및 병리적 상태에 깊은 영향을 미칩니다. 연구자들은 처음에 폐 미생물군이 위치적 유사성 때문에 구인두 미생물군과 동일할 것이라고 추측했습니다. 연구가 진행됨에 따라 과학자들은 이 두 해부학적 부위 간의 유사성을 인정하면서도 차이점을 지적하며 관점을 수정했습니다. 그러나 구인두 미생물군이 폐 미생물군의 생성, 유지, 변화에 영향을 미친다는 점은 부인할 수 없습니다. 구강 건강은 호흡기 질환 발병 위험과 연관되어 있다는 것이 밝혀졌습니다.

위장관 미생물은 높은 복잡성과 풍부함으로 인해 오랫동안 중요하게 여겨져 왔습니다. 이들은 건강한 유기체의 상태를 조절할 뿐만 아니라 다양한 질병과 밀접하게 연관되어 있습니다. 최근 연구자들은 위장관 미생물군이 폐에 미치는 영향, 예를 들어 폐 질환으로부터의 보호 효과가 폐의 원주민 미생물과 관련될 수 있다는 새로운 발견을 했습니다. 폐 미생물군도 장과 그 미생물군에 큰 영향을 미칩니다. 다음 섹션에서는 구강인두 미생물군집, 장 미생물군집, 폐 미생물군집 간의 기원, 구성, 기능 측면에서의 연관성을 조사할 것입니다(그림 3).

Fig. 3

The connection between the lung, oropharynx, and gut microbiomes. The oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract contain abundant and powerful microorganisms that profoundly influence the metabolic activity of the organism, including the lung. Through swallowing or inhalation by the host, the oropharyngeal microbiome is able to migrate. Part of it is repatriated by clearance mechanisms, while other part stays in the lungs and become members of the lung microbiome. Therefore, the lung microbiome is closely, but not identically, related to the oropharyngeal microbiome. The normal state of the oropharyngeal microbiome contributes to the lung immune response by inducing the production of varying levels of cytokines, such as IL-8, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α. On the other hand, a dysregulated oropharyngeal microbiome has the ability to stimulate lung inflammation and lead to lung damage. Its internal environment provides protection against opportunistic pathogens that induce COPD. The gut microbiome is linked to the lungs through the gut-lung axis. The gut-lung axis is bidirectional; the gut microbiome influences lung ecology through ligands and metabolites and is involved in the development of lung diseases. For example, LPS may regulate the TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway in the lung immune system, activating oxidative stress in the lung and mediating lung injury. SCFAs and butyric acid can mediate protection from asthma, while SFB can stimulate Th17 immune responses in the lung. In turn, members of the lung microbiome (such as polysaccharides and LPS) can mediate gut dysbiosis. Some viruses can decrease the abundance of the gut microbiome by inducing the production of IFNs in the lung. Moreover, pulmonary diseases, such as COPD and ARD, often accompany the development of chronic gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., IBD and IBS). (Figures are created with Servier Medical Art and exported under a paid subscription.)

폐, 구인두, 및 장 미생물군집 간의 연결 관계. 

구인두와 소화관은 풍부하고 강력한 미생물을 포함하고 있으며, 

이는 폐를 포함한 유기체의 대사 활동에 깊은 영향을 미칩니다. 

호스트의 삼키기나 흡입을 통해 

구인두 미생물군집은 이동할 수 있습니다. 

이 중 일부는 청소 메커니즘을 통해 다시 배출되지만, 

다른 부분은 폐에 남아 폐 미생물군집의 일원이 됩니다. 

따라서 폐 미생물군집은 

구인두 미생물군집과 밀접하게 관련되어 있지만 

완전히 동일하지는 않습니다. 

정상적인 구인두 미생물군집은 

IL-8, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α와 같은 사이토카인의 다양한 수준을 유도하여 

폐 면역 반응에 기여합니다. 

반면, 

조절되지 않은 구인두 미생물군은 

폐 염증을 자극하고 폐 손상을 유발할 수 있습니다. 

그 내부 환경은 

COPD를 유발하는 기회감염균으로부터 보호 역할을 합니다. 

장 미생물군은 

장-폐 축을 통해 폐와 연결되어 있습니다. 

장-폐 축은 양방향으로 작용하며, 

장 미생물군은 리간드와 대사물을 통해 폐 생태계에 영향을 미치고 

폐 질환의 발병에 관여합니다. 

예를 들어, LPS는 폐 면역 체계의 TLR4/NF-kappaB 경로를 조절하여 폐 내 산화 스트레스를 활성화하고 폐 손상을 매개할 수 있습니다. SCFAs와 부티르산은 천식으로부터의 보호를 매개할 수 있으며, SFB는 폐 내 Th17 면역 반응을 자극할 수 있습니다. 반대로, 폐 미생물군집의 구성원(예: 다당류와 LPS)은 장 미생물군집의 불균형을 매개할 수 있습니다. 일부 바이러스는 폐에서 인터페론(IFN)의 생산을 유도하여 장 미생물군의 풍부도를 감소시킬 수 있습니다. 또한 COPD와 ARD와 같은 폐 질환은 만성 소화기 질환(예: IBD와 IBS)의 발생과 자주 동반됩니다. (그림은 Servier Medical Art를 사용하여 생성되었으며 유료 구독을 통해 수출되었습니다.)

Oropharynx microbiome

Our knowledge of the oropharyngeal microbiota is significantly more comprehensive than that of the lungs. Similar to the gastrointestinal tract, the oral bacterial microbiome varies among individuals but is stable over time in the absence of external disturbances.102,103 In addition, the oral mycobiome and oral virome showed great intra- and interindividual variation.70,104,105 This may affect the respiratory and pulmonary microbiota of healthy individuals and patients.

As mentioned above, the oropharyngeal microbiome is similar to the lung microbiome in terms of species; however, there are differences between some colonies. Bacterial communities in healthy lungs were found to have a significant relationship in terms of makeup with the oral cavity, and significant subject differences were noted.52,106 In contrast, the nasal microbiome contributes little to the lung microbiome of healthy organisms.107 Moreover, researchers found that the number and variety of microbial communities showed continuity from the oral cavity to the lungs.53,108 This may provide strong evidence that the lung microbiome originates from the URT and is always in a transient mobile state. Although the bacterial communities in healthy lungs overlap with those in the oral cavity, they are less concentrated, have fewer members and have a different community composition. For example, the researchers detected Troperyma whipplei in approximately a quarter of the BALF samples but not in the oral wash. This may be due to the selective nature of the pulmonary environment.107 The lungs may select suitable colonies for survival through various rejection mechanisms. It removes microorganisms from the respiratory tract through mucociliary clearance, coughing, and innate and adaptive immunity.109,110 Furthermore, the distal alveoli are immersed in alveolar surfactant, which also has inhibitory activity against certain bacterial strains, further creating autonomous selection of the reproductive population and resulting in a sparse lung microbiome.111

The oropharyngeal microbiome, as one of the most complex and diverse communities, has a significant impact on the body, and naturally, the lungs are no exception. There is no clear relationship between the oral bacterial community and lung function in healthy organisms, but changes in the oral microbiota may affect lung disease because the lungs are exposed to the oral microbial community through respiratory movements such as breathing and coughing. For example, a healthy mouth and oral bacteria are thought to play a role in COPD.112 In addition, certain species of Veillonella and Streptococci, especially Veillonella, can induce the production of varying levels of cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α).113 Moreover, respiratory microbiota rich in oral-associated taxa, such as Rhodobacter and Prevotella, are related to Th17-mediated immune responses in healthy subjects.31 These phenomena show that the oral microecosystem is significant in the pathogenesis of COPD based on the stimulation of inflammation and the promotion of lung injury.17 Oral short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) may relieve allergic airway disease,114,115 demonstrating that metabolites from the outside or the oral cavity can enter and affect the pulmonary state through the airway and digestive tract. Second, the internal environment of the oral microecosystem also protects against opportunistic respiratory pathogens.116,117 More importantly, oral microorganisms enter the lungs through subclinical aspiration and spread across the long bronchial mucosa, directly forming the pulmonary microbial community and directly influencing the growth of pulmonary bacteria.118,119,120

In general, the lung microbiome is close to the oropharyngeal microbiome, and most organisms in the lung are also detected in the oral cavity and URT. Nevertheless, the lung is selective in certain ways. The flora from the URT is reduced through the use of multiple exclusion mechanisms, ultimately retaining a small number of microbial communities. Dysbiosis in the oral cavity may precede or lead to dysbiosis in the lungs and contribute to disease pathogenesis.53 The oropharyngeal microbiome is closely related to the lungs, which also leads to experimental errors. BALF often runs the risk of contamination by oral microorganisms, making the experiment somewhat restrictive.52 However, the influence of the oropharyngeal microbiome on the lung is still very promising. It may be a useful target for determining lung disease progression and may provide new ideas for clinical disease treatment. Finally, due to the absence of systematic research regarding the pulmonary effects of periodontal and gingival microbiota, studies need to be further systematized.

구인두 미생물군집

구인두 미생물군집에 대한 우리의 지식은 폐에 비해 훨씬 더 포괄적입니다. 소화관과 마찬가지로 구강 세균 미생물군집은 개인 간에 차이가 있지만 외부 교란이 없는 경우 시간에 따라 안정적입니다.102,103 또한 구강 진균군집과 구강 바이러스군집은 개인 내 및 개인 간 변이가 매우 컸습니다.70,104,105 이는 건강한 개인과 환자의 호흡기 및 폐 미생물군집에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

위에서 언급된 바와 같이, 구인두 미생물군은 종의 측면에서 폐 미생물군과 유사하지만, 일부 군집 간 차이를 보입니다. 건강한 폐의 세균 군집은 구강과 구성 측면에서 유의미한 관련성을 보였으며, 개인 간 차이는 유의미하게 관찰되었습니다. 52,106 반면, 건강한 유기체의 폐 미생물군집에 대한 비강 미생물군집의 기여도는 낮습니다.107 또한 연구자들은 구강에서 폐로 이어지는 미생물 군집의 수와 다양성이 연속성을 보인다는 사실을 발견했습니다.53,108 이는 폐 미생물군집이 상부 호흡기(URT)에서 기원하며 항상 일시적이고 이동 가능한 상태에 있음을 강력히 시사합니다. 건강한 폐의 세균 군집은 구강과 겹치지만, 농도가 낮고 구성원이 적으며 군집 구성도 다릅니다. 예를 들어, 연구진은 BALF 샘플의 약 25%에서 Troperyma whipplei를 검출했지만 구강 세척액에서는 검출되지 않았습니다. 이는 폐 환경의 선택적 특성 때문일 수 있습니다.107 폐는 다양한 거부 메커니즘을 통해 생존에 적합한 군집을 선택할 수 있습니다. 호흡기에서 미생물을 제거하는 메커니즘에는 점액-섬모 청소, 기침, 선천적 및 적응 면역이 포함됩니다.109,110 또한, 원위부 폐포는 폐포 표면활성제에 잠겨 있으며, 이는 특정 세균 균주에 대한 억제 활성을 가지고 있어 번식 인구 선택을 자율적으로 촉진하고 결과적으로 희박한 폐 미생물군집을 형성합니다.111

구인두 미생물군은

가장 복잡하고 다양한 커뮤니티 중 하나로 신체에 큰 영향을 미치며,

폐도 예외는 아닙니다.

건강한 유기체에서 구강 세균 군집과 폐 기능 사이의 명확한 관계는 없지만, 호흡 운동(호흡, 기침 등)을 통해 구강 미생물군에 노출되기 때문에 구강 미생물군의 변화가 폐 질환에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

예를 들어,

건강한 구강과 구강 세균은

COPD에 역할을 할 것으로 추정됩니다. 112

또한 Veillonella와 Streptococci 속의 특정 종,

특히 Veillonella는 IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 및 종양 괴사 인자-α (TNF-α)와 같은

사이토카인의 다양한 수준을 유도할 수 있습니다.113

또한 구강과 관련된 세균군인 Rhodobacter와 Prevotella가 풍부한 호흡기 미생물군은

건강한 대상에서 Th17 매개 면역 반응과 관련이 있습니다. 31

이러한 현상은 염증 자극과 폐 손상 촉진을 통해

COPD의 병리학적 기전에 구강 미생물 생태계가 중요한 역할을 한다는 것을 보여줍니다.17

구강 단쇄 지방산(SCFAs)은

알레르기성 기도 질환을 완화시킬 수 있으며,114,115

이는 외부 또는 구강에서 유래한 대사물이 기도 및 소화관을 통해 폐 상태에 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 보여줍니다.

둘째,

구강 미생물 생태계의 내부 환경은

기회감염성 호흡기 병원체로부터 보호 역할을 합니다.116,117

더욱 중요한 점은

구강 미생물이 무증상 흡입을 통해 폐로 들어가 긴 기관지 점막에 확산되어

폐 미생물 군집을 직접 형성하고

폐 세균의 성장에 직접적인 영향을 미친다는 점입니다.118,119,120

일반적으로 폐 미생물군은 구인두 미생물군과 유사하며, 폐에 존재하는 대부분의 미생물은 구강과 상기도(URT)에서도 검출됩니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 폐는 특정 측면에서 선택적입니다. 상기도의 미생물군은 다중 배제 메커니즘을 통해 감소되어 최종적으로 소수의 미생물 군집만 유지됩니다. 구강 내 미생물군집의 불균형은 폐의 미생물군집 불균형을 선행하거나 유발할 수 있으며, 질병 발병에 기여할 수 있습니다.53 구인두 미생물군집은 폐와 밀접하게 관련되어 있어 실험 오류의 원인이 될 수 있습니다. BALF는 구강 미생물에 의한 오염 위험이 높아 실험이 다소 제한적입니다.52 그러나 구인두 미생물군집이 폐에 미치는 영향은 여전히 매우 유망합니다. 이는 폐 질환 진행을 판단하는 유용한 표적이 될 수 있으며 임상적 질환 치료에 새로운 아이디어를 제공할 수 있습니다. 마지막으로, 치주 및 치은 미생물군집의 폐 영향에 대한 체계적인 연구가 부족하므로 연구가 더욱 체계화되어야 합니다.

Gut microbiome

As the most intensively studied microbial community to date, the composition, structure, and function of the gut microbiome have been well elucidated.121 The intestinal flora is mainly composed of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Aspergillus, and Actinobacteria, in addition to other bacteria, including Clostridium, Verruciform, and Spirochetes, which occur sporadically. The core gut microbiome includes up to 14 bacterial genera and 150 bacterial “species“.122,123,124 Compared to the gut microbiota, the lung microbiota has lower α-diversity and abundance. By studying how the local microbiome affects immunity at remote locations and how the gut microbiota affects other organs, scientists have coined terms such as the “gut-brain axis” and the “gut-lung axis”. As the name implies, the gut-lung axis refers to the interaction between the gut and the lungs.125 The intestinal microbiota consists of thousands of microorganisms that can influence the pulmonary microbiota by producing ligands, metabolites, and immune cells that reach the lungs via the bloodstream to regulate pulmonary immunity. Through these circulating cells and metabolites, the gut microbiome may affect pulmonary immunity directly and possibly the makeup of the pulmonary microbiome.126 The pulmonary microbiota is also important in supporting a healthy immune response. Through interactions with epithelial cells and immune cells, it is involved in forming the innate and adaptive immune response in the lung.127 In mice, evidence has shown potential connections between the intestinal mucosa and pulmonary mucosa that constitute the gut-lung axis. For instance, polysaccharide-containing airway stimuli alter the gut microbiome, suggesting that the gut-lung axis is able to function in both directions.128

The gut microbiome can affect lung function through both immune and metabolic routes. Substantial evidence has proved the key role that the gut microbiome plays in abnormal immune responses, such as in asthma. For instance, in infants and babies, the existence of pathogenic bacteria in the lungs and intestines is related to the subsequent onset of allergic asthma. Depner and colleagues investigated gut microbial changes in newborns from 2 to 12 months and examined the relationship between the gut flora and allergic asthma.129 The gut microbiota, via lipopolysaccharide (LPS), may modulate the TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway in the pulmonary immune system, increase oxidative stress and mediate injury in the lung by modulating the intestinal barrier.130 Segmented filamentous bacteria in the intestine stimulate Th17 responses in mouse lungs and protect them from Streptococcus pneumoniae infection and lethality.131 Moreover, parenteral bacille Calmette-Guérin transmission through mycobacterial dissemination induces time-dependent changes in barrier function, microbial metabolites, and the gut microbiome. These intestinal alterations affect subsequent changes in circulating and pulmonary metabolites, resulting in the induction of memory macrophages and innate immunity in the lungs.132 It has been shown that some metabolites of intestinal microorganisms, such as SCFAs, can mediate protection against neonatal asthma.114,133,134 Moreover, bacterial communities that have the potential to produce butyric acids, such as Roseburia and Coprococcus, also contribute to asthma protection.135,136 Similarly, enteric bacteria found in the BALF have been characterized in ARDS.16,137,138

The gut-lung axis is bidirectional, which means that the lung can affect gut homeostasis. A study reported that a nonabsorbable tracer appeared in the gastrointestinal tract of mice shortly after nasal injection.139 Intratracheal injection of LPS not only destroyed the respiratory microbiota but also led to the transfer of respiratory bacteria belonging to Clostridium into the bloodstream. Then, it affected the intestinal microbiota within 24 h, significantly increasing the total bacterial load.139 Influenza virus infection in the airway can lead to gut dysbiosis and drive the lungs to produce interferons (IFNs). For example, the influenza A virus induces depletion of the gut microbiota, disruption of mucus layer integrity, and increased levels of antimicrobial peptides in Paneth cells.140 In addition, IFNs produced in the respiratory tract exhibit antibacterial activity and amplify inflammatory responses in the intestinal tract.141 Chronic lung diseases such as asthma and COPD often occur in conjunction with chronic gastrointestinal tract disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).142,143 Patients with IBD and IBS also have a certain chance of developing lung disease.144 Surveys have shown that intestinal mucosal function and structure are altered in asthmatic patients, while intestinal permeability is usually increased in COPD patients, reflecting the close connection between the intestinal and pulmonary axes.145

장 미생물군집

현재까지 가장 집중적으로 연구된 미생물 군집인 장 미생물군의 구성, 구조, 기능은 잘 규명되어 있습니다.121 장 내 미생물군은 Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Aspergillus, Actinobacteria 등 주요 문과 Clostridium, Verruciform, Spirochetes 등 간헐적으로 발생하는 다른 세균으로 구성됩니다.

핵심 장내 미생물군집은

최대 14개의 세균 속과 150개의 세균 '종'을 포함합니다.122,123,124

장내 미생물군집에 비해 폐 미생물군집은

α-다양성과 풍부도가 낮습니다.

지역 미생물군집이 원격 부위의 면역에 미치는 영향과 장내 미생물군집이 다른 장기에 미치는 영향을 연구하면서 과학자들은 '장-뇌 축'과 '장-폐 축'과 같은 용어를 창안했습니다. 장-폐 축은 이름에서 알 수 있듯이 장과 폐 간의 상호작용을 의미합니다.125

장 미생물군은

혈류를 통해 폐로 이동하여 폐 면역력을 조절하는 리간드, 대사산물, 면역 세포를 생성함으로써

폐 미생물군에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 수천 개의 미생물로 구성됩니다.

이러한 순환 세포와 대사물을 통해 장 미생물군은

폐 면역에 직접적으로 영향을 미칠 수 있으며,

폐 미생물군의 구성에도 영향을 줄 수 있습니다.126

폐 미생물군은 건강한 면역 반응을 지원하는 데도 중요합니다. 상피 세포와 면역 세포와의 상호작용을 통해 폐에서 선천적 및 적응성 면역 반응 형성에 관여합니다.127 쥐 실험에서 장 점막과 폐 점막 사이의 연결이 장-폐 축을 구성한다는 증거가 제시되었습니다. 예를 들어, 다당류 함유 기도 자극물은 장 미생물군집을 변화시켜 장-폐 축이 양방향으로 기능할 수 있음을 시사합니다.128

장 미생물군은 면역 및 대사 경로를 통해 폐 기능에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 상당한 증거는 장 미생물군이 천식과 같은 이상 면역 반응에서 핵심 역할을 한다는 것을 입증했습니다. 예를 들어, 영아와 유아에서 폐와 장에 병원성 세균의 존재는 이후 알레르기 천식의 발병과 관련이 있습니다. Depner와 동료들은 2개월에서 12개월 사이의 신생아에서 장 미생물 변화를 조사하고 장 미생물과 알레르기성 천식 간의 관계를 분석했습니다.129 장 미생물은 리포폴리사카라이드(LPS)를 통해 폐 면역계의 TLR4/NF-kappaB 경로를 조절하여 장 장벽을 조절함으로써 산화 스트레스를 증가시키고 폐 손상을 매개할 수 있습니다. 130 장내 분절형 필라멘트 세균은 쥐의 폐에서 Th17 반응을 자극하여 Streptococcus pneumoniae 감염 및 치사율로부터 보호합니다.131 또한, 마이코박테리아 확산을 통해 정맥 내 Bacille Calmette-Guérin(BCG) 전파는 장벽 기능, 미생물 대사산물, 장내 미생물군집의 시간 의존적 변화를 유발합니다. 이러한 장 내 변화는 순환 및 폐 대사물질의 후속 변화를 유발하여 폐에서 기억 대식세포와 선천 면역 반응을 유도합니다.132 장 미생물의 대사산물 중 일부인 SCFAs가 신생아 천식으로부터의 보호를 매개한다는 것이 밝혀졌습니다.114,133,134 또한, 부티르산을 생성할 수 있는 박테리아 군집인 Roseburia와 Coprococcus도 천식 보호에 기여합니다. 135,136 마찬가지로, ARDS에서 BALF에 존재하는 장내 세균이 특성화되었습니다.16,137,138

장-폐 축은 양방향으로 작용하며,

이는 폐가 장의 균형을 방해할 수 있음을 의미합니다.

한 연구에서 비흡수성 추적자가 쥐의 비강 주사 후 짧은 시간 내에 위장관에서 검출되었습니다.139 LPS의 기도 내 주사는 호흡기 미생물군을 파괴할 뿐만 아니라 Clostridium 속의 호흡기 세균이 혈류로 이동하도록 유도했습니다. 이후 24시간 이내에 장내 미생물군집에 영향을 미쳐 총 세균 부하를 유의미하게 증가시켰습니다.139 기도 내 인플루엔자 바이러스 감염은 장내 미생물 불균형을 유발하고 폐가 인터페론(IFNs)을 생성하도록 유도할 수 있습니다. 예를 들어, 인플루엔자 A 바이러스는 장 미생물군집의 감소, 점막층의 무결성 파괴, Paneth 세포에서의 항균 펩타이드 수준 증가를 유발합니다.140 또한 호흡기에서 생성된 IFN은 항균 활성을 나타내며 장 내 염증 반응을 증폭시킵니다.141 천식이나 COPD와 같은 만성 폐 질환은 염증성 장 질환(IBD)이나 과민성 장 증후군(IBS)과 같은 만성 소화기 질환과 자주 동반됩니다. 142,143 IBD 및 IBS 환자는 폐 질환 발병 위험이 일정 부분 존재합니다.144 조사 결과, 천식 환자의 장 점막 기능과 구조가 변화하며, COPD 환자의 장 투과성은 일반적으로 증가하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 이는 장과 폐 축의 밀접한 연관성을 반영합니다.145

Impact on innate and adaptive immune responses

Commensal microorganisms in the lungs and gut are essential to the regular development of immune homeostasis. Microbiota dysbiosis, such as changes in the structure, quantity, and variety of bacteria, increases the susceptibility of the host to infection by various pathogens, exacerbates gut and brain autoimmunity and inflammation, induces diverse methods of metabolic disorders, and fosters the progression of neurological diseases.146,147 Similarly, interactions between commensal microbes and immune barriers (e.g., gastrointestinal mucosa and urethra) have been formerly identified in diverse tissues.148 Thus, microbial dysbiosis can result in irregular inflammatory responses, such as episodes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).149 Existing studies show that the lung microbiome is important for both innate and adaptive immunity (Fig. 4).

선천적 및 적응 면역 반응에 미치는 영향

폐와 장에 존재하는 공생 미생물은 면역 균형의 정상적인 발달에 필수적입니다. 미생물군집 불균형(예: 세균의 구조, 양, 다양성의 변화)은 호스트의 다양한 병원체 감염에 대한 감수성을 증가시키며, 장과 뇌의 자가면역 및 염증을 악화시키고, 다양한 대사 장애를 유발하며, 신경학적 질환의 진행을 촉진합니다. 146,147 마찬가지로, 공생 미생물과 면역 장벽(예: 위장관 점막 및 요도) 간의 상호작용은 다양한 조직에서 이전에 확인되었습니다.148 따라서 미생물 불균형은 기관지폐이형성증(BPD) 발작과 같은 비정상적인 염증 반응을 유발할 수 있습니다.149 기존 연구는 폐 미생물군이 선천적 및 적응 면역 모두에 중요함을 보여줍니다(그림 4).

Fig. 4

Impact of the lung microbiome on the immune response.

The commensal bacteria of the organism are necessary for the maintenance of immune homeostasis. Therefore, alterations in the lung microbiome may contribute to the activation or suppression of immune responses. The microbiota can be detected in the fetal respiratory tract in the early stages of life. As the host grows, both the microbiome and the innate immune system evolve and refine. The microbiome promotes the growth of myeloid cells in the bone marrow, which differentiate to produce immune cells and greatly influence the host’s susceptibility to disease. The innate immune system also plays a significant role in regulating the composition and changes in the microbial community, and microbiome dysregulation occurs in the absence of genes related to innate immunity. Some immune cells migrate or are recruited into the lungs and colonize there, shaping the innate and adaptive immune responses in the lungs. The lung microbiome can participate in innate and adaptive immunity by upregulating the expression‎ of PD-1 while downregulating that of IL-1α. Significantly, the lung microbiome may promote antimicrobial activity by macrophages via ROS, induce immune cells to produce cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17, or inhibit TLR4 signaling. The adaptive immunity response in the lung determines the progression of the disease and thus affects the ecological balance of the microbiome. (Figures are created with Servier Medical Art and exported under a paid subscription.)

폐 미생물군이 면역 반응에 미치는 영향.
생물의 공생 세균은 면역 균형 유지에 필수적입니다. 따라서 폐 미생물군의 변화는 면역 반응의 활성화 또는 억제에 기여할 수 있습니다. 미생물군은 생명의 초기 단계에서 태아의 호흡기 계통에서 검출될 수 있습니다. 호스트가 성장함에 따라 미생물군집과 선천성 면역 체계는 진화하고 정교해집니다. 미생물군집은 골수에서 골수성 세포의 성장을 촉진하며, 이 세포들은 면역 세포로 분화되어 호스트의 질병 감수성에 큰 영향을 미칩니다. 선천성 면역 체계는 미생물 군집의 구성과 변화 조절에 중요한 역할을 하며, 선천성 면역과 관련된 유전자가 결여될 경우 미생물군집의 조절 장애가 발생합니다. 일부 면역 세포는 폐로 이동하거나 모집되어 정착하며, 폐의 선천성 및 적응성 면역 반응을 형성합니다. 

폐 미생물군집은 PD-1 발현을 증가시키고 IL-1α 발현을 감소시켜 선천성 및 적응성 면역에 참여할 수 있습니다. 

특히, 폐 미생물군은 ROS를 통해 대식세포의 항균 활성을 촉진하거나, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17과 같은 사이토카인의 생산을 유도하거나, TLR4 신호전달을 억제함으로써 항균 활동을 촉진할 수 있습니다. 폐의 적응 면역 반응은 질병의 진행을 결정하며 따라서 미생물군의 생태적 균형에 영향을 미칩니다. (그림은 Servier Medical Art를 사용하여 생성되었으며 유료 구독을 통해 수출되었습니다.)

Full size image

Innate immune response

The innate immune response is the initial bodily defense mechanism against pathogens. This signaling can be activated by particles, toxins, allergens, microbes, and endogenous debris (such as dead cells) from the ambient air.150 Recognition of microorganisms by the innate immune system initiates a signaling cascade downstream of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that trigger an immune response.151,152 The airway of the newborn is affected by the amniotic fluid, placenta, and vagina during pregnancy and develops its microbiota as early as birth.153 These microorganisms are involved in innate immunity and related responses.154

Most of the studies describe the airway microbiota present in the early stages of life, which predominantly includes Staphylococcus and Ureaplasma.155,156 The pulmonary microbiome advances during the initial weeks or months after the infant’s birth. The colonization time of microorganisms is controversial. Mourani et al. noticed that during the first 72 h of life, 2 of 10 tracheal aspirates from intubated preterm infants contained detectable microbial DNA, while all samples from this neonate were detectable on the 7th day.157 Nevertheless, Lohmann et al. reported that in 25 preterm infants, microbial DNA was detected in all tracheal aspirates inhaled instantly after intubation on the first day at birth.158 Moreover, the external environment, such as contamination of the placenta sample, cannot be ignored.159 The gut microbiome stabilizes through the first 3 years of life,160 but the precise time needed for the respiratory microbiome to fully mature remains to be determined. This is because the respiratory microbiome evolves during the initial years of life.161,162 Early lung microbiome colonization profoundly influences the progression of respiratory diseases and the action of the immune system later in life.163

Host-microbe interactions influence different aspects of the development of the body’s immune system and contribute to immune maturation, immune tolerance, and immune responses.164,165 In the absence of microbiota, myeloid cell differentiation in the bone marrow is reduced, leading to delayed clearance of general bacterial infections.166 The effect of the microbiome on the recruitment and gene expression‎ of tissue-resident myeloid cells is accomplished primarily by the regulation of local metabolites and tissue mediators. Microbial PRR ligands can affect circulating granulocytes. Moreover, myelopoiesis is reduced in the bone marrow with the lack of commensal bacteria and their microbial products in the blood. Such alterations in bone marrow greatly affect the susceptibility of the host to various diseases, such as allergies and asthma.167,168 In addition, the colonization of symbiotic colonies during the neonatal period in mice reduces CpG methylation in the gene encoding CXCL16, thus protecting mice from the enhanced mucosal accumulation of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells in the lung. Moreover, microbial colonization-established mucosal iNKT cell tolerance is critical for protection against the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and allergic asthma.169 Moreover, in the absence of the commensal microbiota, the antimicrobial activity of alveolar macrophages via reactive oxygen species is compromised, thereby jeopardizing the physiological clearance of potentially pathogenic bacteria.170 Certain microbes, such as S. pneumoniae, promote a broad intrinsic response in the respiratory tract, support clearance of pathogens, and enhance host survival during infection by signaling the axis of IL-17 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.171 Lung epithelial cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) have diverse receptors to sense microorganisms. These include microbial PRR ligands, TLR, and NOD-like receptors.172 Epithelial cells activate DCs by translocating microbes.173 Below alveolar epithelial cells, DCs present processed antigens to different T-cell subpopulations, thereby activating adaptive immune responses.174

Changes in bacterial diversity similarly modulate molecules such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and various innate and adaptive immune populations. For example, during the first two weeks of life, a change in the dominant bacterial phylum from Firmicutes and γ-Proteobacteria to Bacteroides promotes transient PD-L1 expression‎ and modulates general aeroallergen responses and regulatory T-cell (Treg cell) activation.175 In a mouse model, the pulmonary microbiota affected host immunity at the focal level.58 The concentrations of two significant inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-1α) were linked to the variety and inhabitant structure of the lung microbiome. In healthy mice, IL-1α is one of the key cytokines for lung innate immune activity against bacteria and is negatively correlated with the variety of bacterial communities and the existence of pathogenic bacteria. Moreover, pulmonary concentrations of these inflammatory cytokines were more closely related to changes in the lung microbiome than to concentrations in the distal intestine or oral cavity.58 A dysfunctional lung microbiome encourages the development of disease, while symbiotic bacteria under normal conditions help maintain the body’s health. Symbiotic bacteria in the URT defend against influenza virus infection in mice through the polarization of M2 macrophages and the secretion of anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β).176 Moreover, microbiota-produced metabolites are also associated with the immune response. For instance, exposure of dendritic cells (DCs) to P. aeruginosa can induce the production of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α by generating high concentrations of putrescine.177 In a mouse model, in comparison to the mouse group given salt solution, Lactobacillus rhamnosus administration dramatically decreased pulmonary metastasis,178 and intranasal administration of rhamnolipid reduced IL-6 levels in the lungs and protected against influenza virus infection.179

Models from both humans and mice show the important role of the innate immune response in modulating microbiota variation, composition, and individual differences.180 In several innate immunodeficiency mouse models, such as mice lacking the Nod2 gene,181 the Nlrp6 gene182 or the Tlr5183 gene, a biological disorder was found. Consequently, innate immunity promotes the development of beneficial components of the microbiome and is involved in the maintenance of microbial ecological balance. In addition, after the injection of lipopolysaccharide into experimental rats, significant dynamic changes in the diversity, makeup, and function of the lung microbiome occurred with the fluctuation of systemic cytokine levels and the onset and resolution of pulmonary edema. It was also observed that pulmonary microbiota, such as Curtobacterium, were related to the hematological percentage of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and neutrophils.184 Epithelial cells are linked to multiple mechanisms of interaction with the intrapulmonary microbiota and act as a permeability barrier, sensing microorganisms and responding to their presence.185 In the lower respiratory tract, by providing a strong barrier, the airway epithelium serves as the primary line of defense against potentially harmful environmental irritants. It is the first site of interplay with inhaled compounds and is designed to promote the effective clearance of particles and microorganisms by mucus cilia.186 In chronic lung diseases, increased mucus production by epithelial cells facilities the growth of bacteria and causes low oxygen concentrations and high-temperature zones, which promote the selectivity and stability of specific bacteria.187 Although the functions of epithelial cells in antibacterial and antiviral immunity are well established, little information has been reported on the effect of respiratory epithelial cells on the mycobiome.

선천성 면역 반응

선천성 면역 반응은 병원체에 대한 신체 최초의 방어 메커니즘입니다. 이 신호 전달은 주변 공기에서 유래한 입자, 독소, 알레르겐, 미생물, 내인성 잔여물(예: 사체 세포) 등에 의해 활성화될 수 있습니다.150 선천성 면역 체계가 미생물을 인식하면 패턴 인식 수용체(PRRs)를 통해 하류 신호 전달 경로가 활성화되어 면역 반응을 유발합니다. 151,152 신생아의 기도는 임신 중 양수, 태반, 자궁경관을 통해 영향을 받으며 출생 직후부터 미생물군집을 형성합니다.153 이러한 미생물은 선천성 면역 및 관련 반응에 관여합니다.154

대부분의 연구는 생후 초기 단계의 기도 미생물군집을 설명하며, 이는 주로 Staphylococcus와 Ureaplasma를 포함합니다.155,156 폐 미생물군집은 신생아 출생 후 초기 몇 주 또는 몇 달 동안 발달합니다. 미생물의 정착 시간은 논란의 여지가 있습니다. Mourani 등(et al.)은 생후 72시간 이내에 기관 내 삽관된 조산아 10명 중 2명의 기관지 흡인물에서 검출 가능한 미생물 DNA가 발견되었으며, 이 신생아의 모든 샘플은 7일째에 검출 가능했습니다. 157 그러나 Lohmann 등(et al.)은 25명의 조산아에서 출생 후 첫날 기관 내 삽관 직후 흡인한 모든 기관지 흡인물에서 미생물 DNA가 검출되었다고 보고했습니다.158 또한 태반 샘플의 오염과 같은 외부 환경 요인도 무시할 수 없습니다. 159 장 미생물군은 생후 첫 3년 동안 안정화되지만,160 호흡기 미생물군이 완전히 성숙하는 데 필요한 정확한 시간은 아직 밝혀지지 않았습니다. 이는 호흡기 미생물군이 생후 초기 몇 년 동안 진화하기 때문입니다.161,162 초기 폐 미생물군 정착은 생후 후반기의 호흡기 질환 진행과 면역 체계 작용에 깊은 영향을 미칩니다.163

호스트-미생물 상호작용은 신체 면역 시스템의 발달 다양한 측면에 영향을 미치며 면역 성숙, 면역 관용, 면역 반응에 기여합니다.164,165 미생물이 결여된 경우 골수 내 골수 세포 분화가 감소하여 일반 세균 감염의 제거가 지연됩니다. 166 미생물군이 조직 거주 골수 세포의 모집과 유전자 발현에 미치는 영향은 주로 국소 대사산물과 조직 매개체의 조절을 통해 이루어집니다. 미생물 PRR 리간드는 순환하는 과립구에도 영향을 미칩니다. 또한, 혈액 내 공생 세균과 그 미생물 제품이 결여되면 골수에서의 골수 생성(myelopoiesis)이 감소합니다. 골수에서의 이러한 변화는 알레르기 및 천식과 같은 다양한 질환에 대한 호스트의 감수성에 크게 영향을 미칩니다.167,168 또한, 쥐의 신생아기 동안 공생 미생물 군집의 정착은 CXCL16 유전자의 CpG 메틸화를 감소시켜 폐에서 불변 자연살해 T 세포(iNKT 세포)의 점막 축적을 억제함으로써 쥐를 보호합니다. 또한 미생물 정착에 의해 확립된 점막 iNKT 세포 내성은 장 염증 및 알레르기성 천식의 병리 발생으로부터 보호하는 데 필수적입니다.169 또한 공생 미생물이 결여된 경우, 폐포 대식세포의 활성산소종(ROS)을 통한 항균 활성이 저하되어 잠재적으로 병원성 세균의 생리적 제거가 위협받습니다. 170 특정 미생물, 예를 들어 S. pneumoniae는 호흡기에서 광범위한 내인성 반응을 촉진하며, 병원체 제거를 지원하고 감염 시 호스트 생존을 향상시키기 위해 IL-17 및 그란룰로사이트-대식세포 콜로니 자극 인자 축을 신호합니다.171 폐 상피 세포, 대식세포 및 ден드리틱 세포(DCs)는 미생물을 감지하기 위한 다양한 수용체를 보유하고 있습니다. 이에는 미생물 PRR 리간드, TLR, 및 NOD 유사 수용체가 포함됩니다.172 상피 세포는 미생물을 이동시켜 DC를 활성화합니다.173 폐포 상피 세포 아래에서 DC는 처리된 항원을 다양한 T 세포 하위 집단에 제시하여 적응 면역 반응을 활성화합니다.174

세균 다양성의 변화는 프로그래밍된 사망 리간드 1(PD-L1) 및 다양한 선천적 및 적응 면역 세포 집단과 같은 분자를 조절합니다. 예를 들어, 생후 첫 2주 동안 우점 세균 문이 Firmicutes와 γ-Proteobacteria에서 Bacteroides로 변화하면 일시적인 PD-L1 발현이 촉진되며, 일반적인 공기 알레르겐 반응과 조절 T세포(Treg 세포) 활성화가 조절됩니다. 175 마우스 모델에서 폐 미생물군은 호스트 면역에 국소적으로 영향을 미쳤습니다.58 두 가지 주요 염증성 사이토킨(IL-4 및 IL-1α)의 농도는 폐 미생물군의 다양성과 구성과 연관되었습니다. 건강한 마우스에서 IL-1α는 세균에 대한 폐 선천성 면역 활동의 핵심 사이토킨 중 하나이며, 세균 군집의 다양성과 병원성 세균의 존재와 음의 상관관계를 보였습니다. 또한, 폐 내 염증성 사이토카인의 농도는 장의 원위부나 구강 내 농도보다 폐 미생물군집의 변화와 더 밀접하게 관련되었습니다.58 기능 장애를 보이는 폐 미생물군집은 질병 발병을 촉진하지만, 정상 조건 하에서 공생 세균은 신체 건강 유지에 도움을 줍니다. 상부 호흡기(URT)의 공생 세균은 M2 대식세포의 분극화와 IL-10 및 변형 성장 인자-β(TGF-β)와 같은 항염증 매개체의 분비를 통해 쥐의 인플루엔자 바이러스 감염을 방어합니다.176 또한 미생물군집이 생성하는 대사산물도 면역 반응과 연관되어 있습니다. 예를 들어, P. aeruginosa에 노출된 ден드리틱 세포(DCs)는 푸트레신 농도가 높아지면서 IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α의 생산을 유도합니다. 177 쥐 모델에서 소금 용액을 투여한 쥐 그룹에 비해 Lactobacillus rhamnosus 투여는 폐 전이를 현저히 감소시켰으며,178 비강 내 투여된 라만노리피드는 폐 내 IL-6 수치를 감소시키고 인플루엔자 바이러스 감염으로부터 보호했습니다.179

인간과 쥐 모델 모두에서 선천성 면역 반응이 미생물군집의 변동, 구성, 개인 차이를 조절하는 데 중요한 역할을 한다는 것이 밝혀졌습니다.180 Nod2 유전자 결핍 쥐, Nlrp6 유전자 결핍 쥐, Tlr5 유전자 결핍 쥐 등 여러 선천성 면역 결핍 쥐 모델에서 생물학적 장애가 발견되었습니다. 따라서 선천 면역은 미생물군집의 유익한 성분 발달을 촉진하며 미생물 생태계 균형 유지에 관여합니다. 또한 실험용 쥐에 리포폴리사카라이드(LPS)를 주입한 후, 전신 사이토킨 수치의 변동과 폐부종 발생 및 해소와 함께 폐 미생물군집의 다양성, 구성, 기능에 대한 유의미한 동적 변화가 관찰되었습니다. 또한 폐 미생물군집인 Curtobacterium이 IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α 및 중성구 혈액학적 비율과 관련이 있다는 것이 관찰되었습니다.184 상피 세포는 폐 내 미생물군집과의 상호작용 메커니즘에 관여하며 투과 장벽으로 작용하여 미생물을 감지하고 그 존재에 반응합니다. 185 하부 호흡기에서 강한 장벽을 제공함으로써 기도 상피는 잠재적으로 유해한 환경 자극물질에 대한 첫 번째 방어선으로 기능합니다. 이는 흡입된 화합물과의 상호작용의 첫 번째 장소이며, 점액 섬모를 통해 입자 및 미생물의 효과적인 제거를 촉진하도록 설계되었습니다. 186 만성 폐 질환에서 상피 세포의 점액 생산 증가가 세균의 증식을 촉진하고 저산소 농도와 고온 구역을 유발하여 특정 세균의 선택성과 안정성을 높입니다.187 상피 세포의 항균 및 항바이러스 면역 기능은 잘 확립되어 있지만, 호흡기 상피 세포가 미생물군집에 미치는 영향에 대한 보고는 제한적입니다.

Adaptive immune response

The adaptive immune response includes specific cells (cellular immunity) and immunoglobulins (humoral immunity). This response is dynamic and depends on the exposure of the organism to exogenous substances, as well as the microbial components, metabolites, and local microenvironment.188 Using the gut microbiome as a reference, DCs in the gut encounter the resident microbiota. Microbes generate signals that lead to changes in the phenotype of DCs. These DCs not only relocate to the mesenteric lymph nodes, stimulating the creation of regulatory cytokines but also present bacterial-derived antigens to T cells, resulting in their activation.189 In addition, activated T cells can access the airway mucosa, where they facilitate anti-inflammatory and protective responses.190,191 Due to the close connection between the gut and lung microbiomes, we also propose a strong association between adaptive immunity and the lung microbiome from the perspective of adaptive immunity-associated cells.

As mentioned, enrichment of the oropharyngeal microbiome in the lung, such as enrichment of Veillonella and Revotella, was correlated with phenotypes of inflammation, including increased Th17 lymphocyte levels, increased inflammatory cytokine expression‎, and reduced expression‎ of the inflammatory cytokine TLR4 in alveolar macrophages.57 In mice, neutrophil infiltration, high levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, and moderate levels of CD4+ T-cell-derived IFN-γ and IL-17 were related to Proteobacterium catarrhalis infection. For instance, the inhalation of oral commensals in healthy mice induces a prolonged immune response. This includes CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation, Th17 and γδ T-cell recruitment, and other counterregulatory immune responses, including increased Treg cells and increased immune checkpoint inhibitor markers on T cells.192 Certain pulmonary microorganisms, including Staphylococcus, produce SCFAs to regulate changes in oral microorganisms.193 In the epithelial lining of immunocompromised patients, SCFA production is correlated with increased levels of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) antigen-induced Treg cells.193,194 Tryptophan produced from lung fungi is converted to kynurenine by host indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, which causes an increase in Treg cells and a downregulation of Th17-mediated mucosal inflammation.195 Respiratory viruses can modulate host adaptive immune responses, such by suppressing Th17-induced production of antimicrobial peptides, and influenza A promotes S. aureus colonization and infection.196 Moreover, Sendai virus infection in mice is associated with IL-13-dependent NKT cell activation and follow-up airway hyperreactivity.197 Likewise, impaired Treg cell function in mice is caused by early infection with respiratory syncytial virus.198 Bacteria in lung cancer are characterized by a decline in α-diversity and an increase in total bacterial load. The exact outcome of changed microbial diversity has not been elucidated, but studies have previously shown that an increase in α-diversity is often associated with improved survival and therapeutic consequences in several cancers (e.g., cervical cancer) by increasing the tumor infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes as well as activated subsets of CD4 cells expressing ki67+ and CD69+.199 The growth of lung tumors is related to an increase in the number of bacteria and changes in bacterial composition in the airway. Such a dysregulated native microbiome triggers myeloid differentiation factor 88 (Myd88)-dependent production of IL-1 and IL-23 and induces the activation and proliferation of pulmonary resident Vγ6 + Vδ1 + γδ T cells.200 The microbiota takes advantage of the pulmonary microenvironment of immunity to foster neoplasm growth and disease development.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) pneumonia patients show a higher microbiota diversity than AIDS-free pneumonia patients.201 In a case of 60 Ugandan AIDS patients who had their pneumonia treated with antimicrobial therapy, those with decreased airway bacterial diversity showed an increased bacterial load and increased expression‎ of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)−9 and pro-inflammatory TNF-α.202 In addition, the differences in the lower respiratory groups of patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are much greater than those of healthy individuals. These studies demonstrate that the composition of the respiratory tract microbiota correlates with the immune response. In addition, Troph eryma whipplei, the causative agent of Whipple’s disease, is a common bacterium in the lungs of people living with HIV, especially smokers.203

적응 면역 반응

적응 면역 반응은 특정 세포(세포 면역)와 면역글로불린(체액 면역)을 포함합니다.

이 반응은 동적이며, 유기체가 외인성 물질에 노출되는 정도, 미생물 성분, 대사산물, 및 국소 미세환경에 따라 달라집니다.188 장 미생물군을 참조로 삼을 때, 장 내 DC는 거주 미생물군과 접촉합니다. 미생물은 DC의 표현형 변화를 유발하는 신호를 생성합니다. 이러한 DC는 장간막 림프절로 이동하여 조절 사이토카인의 생성을 자극할 뿐만 아니라 T 세포에 세균 유래 항원을 제시하여 그 활성화를 유도합니다. 189

또한 활성화된 T 세포는 기도 점막에 접근하여 항염증 및 보호 반응을 촉진합니다.190,191 장과 폐 미생물군집 간의 밀접한 연결로 인해, 우리는 적응 면역과 관련된 세포의 관점에서 적응 면역과 폐 미생물군집 간의 강한 연관성을 제안합니다.

앞서 언급된 바와 같이, 폐 내 구인두 미생물군집의 풍부화(예: Veillonella 및 Revotella의 풍부화)는 염증 표현형과 관련이 있었으며, 이는 Th17 림프구 수준 증가, 염증성 사이토킨 발현 증가, 폐포 대식세포에서의 염증성 사이토킨 TLR4 발현 감소 등을 포함합니다. 57 쥐에서 중성구 침윤, IL-6 및 TNF-α의 높은 수준, CD4+ T 세포 유래 IFN-γ 및 IL-17의 중간 수준은 Proteobacterium catarrhalis 감염과 관련이 있었습니다. 예를 들어, 건강한 쥐에서 구강 공생균의 흡입은 장기화된 면역 반응을 유발합니다. 이에는 CD4+ 및 CD8+ T 세포 활성화, Th17 및 γδ T 세포 모집, Treg 세포 증가 및 T 세포상의 면역 체크포인트 억제자 표지자 증가를 포함한 기타 조절 면역 반응이 포함됩니다.192 특정 폐 미생물, 특히 Staphylococcus는 구강 미생물의 변화를 조절하기 위해 SCFAs를 생성합니다. 193 면역 결핍 환자의 상피 내막에서 SCFA 생산은 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) 항원 유도 Treg 세포의 증가와 관련이 있습니다.193,194 폐 곰팡이에서 생성된 트립토판은 호스트 인돌아민 2,3-디오xygenase에 의해 키누레닌으로 전환되어 Treg 세포 증가와 Th17 매개 점막 염증의 억제를 유발합니다. 195 호흡기 바이러스는 호스트 적응 면역 반응을 조절할 수 있으며, 예를 들어 Th17에 의해 유도된 항균 펩타이드 생산을 억제하거나, 인플루엔자 A는 S. aureus의 정착과 감염을 촉진합니다. 196 또한, 센다이 바이러스 감염은 쥐에서 IL-13 의존성 NKT 세포 활성화와 후속 기도 과민반응과 연관되어 있습니다.197 마찬가지로, 호흡기 세포융합 바이러스의 초기 감염은 쥐에서 Treg 세포 기능 장애를 유발합니다.198 폐암에서 세균은 α-다양성 감소와 총 세균 부하 증가로 특징지어집니다.

미생물 다양성 변화의 정확한 결과는 아직 명확히 규명되지 않았지만, 이전 연구들은 α-다양성 증가가 CD4+ 림프구의 종양 침윤 및 ki67+ 및 CD69+를 발현하는 활성화된 CD4 세포 하위 집단의 증가를 통해 여러 암(예: 자궁경부암)에서 생존율과 치료 결과 개선과 연관되어 있음을 보여주었습니다. 199 폐 종양의 성장은 기도 내 세균 수의 증가와 세균 구성의 변화와 관련이 있습니다. 이러한 조절되지 않은 원생 미생물군은 골수 분화 인자 88(Myd88)에 의존하여 IL-1 및 IL-23의 생산을 촉진하고 폐 거주성 Vγ6+Vδ1+γδ T 세포의 활성화 및 증식을 유도합니다.200 미생물군은 면역 미세환경을 활용하여 종양 성장과 질병 진행을 촉진합니다.

후천성 면역 결핍 증후군(AIDS) 폐렴 환자는 AIDS가 없는 폐렴 환자보다 미생물군 다양성이 더 높습니다.201 우간다 AIDS 환자 60명을 대상으로 항생제 치료를 받은 폐렴 환자 중 기도 세균 다양성이 감소한 환자는 세균 부하 증가와 매트릭스 메탈로프로테아제(MMP)-9 및 염증 유발성 TNF-α 발현 증가를 보였습니다. 202 또한, 진행성 인간 면역결핍 바이러스(HIV) 환자의 하부 호흡기 그룹 간 차이는 건강한 개인보다 훨씬 큽니다. 이러한 연구는 호흡기 미생물군집의 구성과 면역 반응이 상관관계가 있음을 보여줍니다. 또한, 휘플 병의 원인균인 Tropheryma whipplei는 HIV 감염자, 특히 흡연자의 폐에서 흔히 발견되는 세균입니다.203

Lung microbiome and respiratory diseases

We have shown that a healthy lung microbiome is transient and is influenced by adjacent body parts and the external environment. Unlike the oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract, the pulmonary microbiome is not an actively colonizing and stationary community. In contrast, in respiratory disease, the microbiota is much more likely to be long-lasting and reside in the respiratory tract and lungs. The change in the status of the pulmonary microbiome from eubiosis to dysbiosis is associated with disease progression.204,205 However, the causal relationship between its dysregulation and disease onset remains to be explored. For instance, altered pathophysiology of lung structures and damaged mucus clearance mechanisms may lead to dysbiosis of the microbiome. However, dysregulation of the microbiome may play a pathogenic role in disease by upregulating inflammatory signals or interfering with cytokine production.206,207 Thus, the presence of the pulmonary microbiome is a new direction for studying pathogenesis and disease progression. We concisely summarize the association between the pulmonary microbiome and different lung diseases, mainly focusing on the effect of the pulmonary microbiome on COVID-19 and lung cancer (Table 1).

폐 미생물군과 호흡기 질환

우리는 건강한 폐 미생물군이 일시적이며 인접한 신체 부위와 외부 환경의 영향을 받는다는 것을 보여주었습니다. 구강인두와 소화관과 달리 폐 미생물군은 적극적으로 정착하고 정지된 공동체가 아닙니다. 반면 호흡기 질환에서는 미생물군이 훨씬 더 오래 지속되며 호흡기 및 폐에 거주할 가능성이 높습니다. 폐 미생물군의 상태가 유비오시스에서 디스바이오시스로 변화하는 것은 질병 진행과 연관되어 있습니다.204,205 그러나 그 조절 장애와 질병 발병 간의 인과 관계는 여전히 연구가 필요합니다. 예를 들어, 폐 구조의 병리생리학적 변화와 점액 제거 메커니즘의 손상은 미생물군의 디스바이오시스를 유발할 수 있습니다. 그러나 미생물군집의 조절 장애는 염증 신호 전달을 활성화하거나 사이토킨 생산을 방해함으로써 질병의 병리적 역할을 할 수 있습니다.206,207 따라서 폐 미생물군집의 존재는 병인 메커니즘과 질병 진행 연구의 새로운 방향을 제시합니다.

우리는

폐 미생물군집과 다양한 폐 질환 간의 연관성을 간결하게 요약하며,

특히 폐 미생물군집이 COVID-19와 폐암에 미치는 영향에 초점을 맞췄습니다(표 1).

Table 1 Clinical trials in lung diseases involving the microbiome

Full size table

Asthma

Asthma is characterized by abnormal airway mucosa, inflammation, and intermittent wheezing.208,209 The complex interactions between the immune system, the lung, the gut microbiome, and the airways, as well as the ecological dysregulation of the microbiome, may be critical factors in asthma development, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of asthma.210 Dysbiosis of the microbiome is a basis for the pathogenesis of asthma.126 It features an increase in pathogenic communities, such as Haemophilus and Staphylococcus, as well as Actinomyces,211 accompanied by a decrease in the number of concomitant commensal bacteria (e.g., Prevotella and Veillonella).212,213 In addition, Pseudomonas is a pathogen in many patients, more commonly in patients with severe asthma, but it is almost undetectable in normal lungs.214 16S rRNA analysis of the tracheal microbiome revealed high concentrations of Haemophilus, Fusobacterium, Neisseriaceae, Sphingomonas, and Porphyromonas in patients hospitalized with atopic asthma and low levels of Bacteroides and Lactobacillus.215 These asthmatic lung microbiotas increase the predictive potential of butyrate and propionate metabolism, which may be helpful for the development of atopic asthma by restricting the bioavailability of SCFAs or increasing the metabolism of SCFAs.114,215 The vicious cycle of lung flora dysbiosis, resulting in a higher level of lung inflammation and imbalanced immunity, contributes to the development of allergic asthma and the diverse characteristics of severe asthma. For instance, allergic asthma is triggered by the activation of the body’s innate or acquired immunity through changes in the composition of the bacterial wall or bacterial products in the airway.216,217 In addition, the lung microbiome induces chronic inflammatory processes by activating Th2 and other pathways that may exacerbate asthma progression. This inflammatory process may promote specific bacterial colonies, which in turn may lead to further microbial dysbiosis. Finally, certain pathogenic bacteria may affect the immune cell response to drug therapy by influencing the activity of pathogenic factors such as mitogen-activated kinase phosphatase-1.218

In general, asthma is characterized by an increase in pathogens of the pulmonary microbiome, which leads to recurrent inflammation and the stimulation, or even exacerbation, of the body’s immune dysfunction. Based on the interaction between asthma and the lung microbiome, more experiments are required to uncover the relationship between the lung microbiome and allergic diseases.

COPD

COPD is a heterogeneous disease characterized by inflammation-driven bronchitis, emphysema, fixed airflow obstruction, and impaired lung function.219,220 The microbiota in COPD patients is significantly different from that in controls. Multiple bacteria are often present in COPD, including potential respiratory pathogens.221 In addition, the number of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Lactobacillus, increases with increasing airflow restriction.221 We compared the microbiota of 5 COPD patients with 11 asthmatic patients and 8 healthy subjects. It was found that pathogenic Proteobacteria, particularly Haemophilus, were increased in asthma and COPD patients.12,13 In contrast, Bacteroides, especially Prevotella, rarely appeared in patients with asthma and COPD.14,213

Microbial diversity, which is associated with emphysema destruction, fine bronchial and alveolar tissue remodeling, and CD4+ T-cell infiltration of tissues, decreased in the lung microbiome. The emergence of a host immune response to the microbiome also contributes to the pathogenesis of COPD.222 In detail, the chronic airway inflammation in COPD is related to a γ-proteobacteria-dominated microbiota.205 Proteobacteria and Actinomycetes are correlated with immune cell infiltration in the lung tissue, which includes neutrophils, eosinophils, and B cells.222,223 Compared to healthy subjects, samples from COPD patients showed moderate biocomplexity and specific pathogenic features.224 In addition, pulmonary bacteria and their metabolites were linked to clinical outcomes in mild COPD. Some bacterial metabolites, such as adenosine, 5’-methylthioadenosine, sialic acid, tyrosine, and glutathione, are associated with better COPD prognosis.57,225

At present, there are relatively few studies on the relationship between fungi and viruses and COPD. The lung mycobiome promotes sensitization in COPD bronchiectasis,226 but the involvement of the virome is unclear.

CF

CF is mainly caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene.227 In the initial stage, the microbiota of patients with cystic fibrosis is mainly P. aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Burkholderia cepacia, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.228 As the disease progresses (~1–2 years of age) and the oral microbiota becomes abundant (~3–5 years of age), the disease eventually develops into cystic fibrosarcoma.229,230

During clinical stabilization, the airway microbiota of CF patients is relatively unchanged. In contrast, structural alterations in the microbiome are relevant to pulmonary deterioration. Daily sampling for patterns of microbiome changes may be useful in predicting and managing the progression of CF.231 Both oral predominant and pathogenic predominant microbiomes were associated with increased inflammation and structural changes in the lung features of cystic fibrosis patients.230 Several investigations indicate that a subgroup of the CF anaerobic oropharyngeal microbiota may promote the colonization of pathogens such as P. aeruginosa by fermenting mucus to produce fatty acids and amino acids, which such pathogens may use as a carbon source.232 P. aeruginosa can cause chronic infection, which is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary exacerbation (PE) and increased colonization of diverse pathogens, failure to recover lung function after PE, and rapid loss of lung function over time, causing premature death in patients with CF.233,234 Some of these characteristics may be related to gene mutations. Some genes, such as quorum sensing regulators involved in the expression‎ of the virulence factor lasR, are common mutation targets. LasR loss-of-function mutations appear to increase tolerance to β-lactam antibiotics and favor growth on certain carbon and nitrogen sources, thus promoting the growth and colonization of pathogenic bacteria. Moreover, increased numbers and diversity of anaerobic bacteria were associated with less severe disease, better lung function and body mass index, and reduced pancreatic insufficiency. For example, Prevotella can reduce P. aeruginosa-induced proinflammatory responses in bronchial epithelial cells.235 Thus, the lung microbiome may play a necessary role in pathogen formation and the inflammatory response. Furthermore, CF also affects the habitat of microbiota and even causes different microbiome changes depending on the cause of the disease. As intermittent P. aeruginosa infection occurs in CF without dysbiosis, chronic P. aeruginosa infection leads to pulmonary dysbiosis. The overall decrease in α-diversity in patients suffering from chronic P. aeruginosa infection, including a decrease in the specificity of Prevotella, Neisseria, and Veillonella, results in a reduction in the diversity of the lung microbiome, along with a change in the dominant population.236 The microbiome composition of CF subjects differs significantly from that of healthy patients and exhibits poor diversity. Each patient has a unique population, usually controlled by one or a few major colonizing bacteria and pathogens, such as Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Stenotrophomonas, or Achromobacter.224 Similar to other lung diseases, the deterioration of lung function in CF patients is also inversely correlated with microbial diversity. When lung function declines, the lung microbiome becomes dominated by CF pathogens. The lung microbiome is therefore used clinically as an indicator of disease progression.237

Increasing evidence suggests that fungal and viral groups play a key role in CF. For example, in patients with CF, Candida albicans increased in the lungs and grew together with P. aeruginosa.66,238 Moreover, Malassezia was detected as an abundant community in asthmatic and CF patients but not in controls.239 In addition, rhinovirus promotes the colonization and reproduction of cystic fibrosis-associated pathogenic bacteria.240,241

Overall, patients with CF have specific pathogens at each stage, which change during the progression of the disease. The molecular mechanisms in CF mediated by the lung microbiome need to be further explored, and its role at the genetic level also deserves attention.

Pulmonary fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic, progressive, and lifelong lung disease in which the lungs become damaged and scarred. This kind of lung damage can be caused by many different factors, including silica, fibers, radiation, drugs, and inflammation-related diseases. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a prototype featuring extracellular matrix expansion and lung structure destruction with unknown causative factors.242

The most common bacteria in the lungs of IPF patients are Prevotella, Veillonella, and Escherichia.243 The number of Streptococci in airway microbiome samples in patients with IPF also increased.243,244 Notable differences in the composition and dominant species were discovered when comparing the lower respiratory microbiomes of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) and IPF patients. In IPF, Firmicutes dominated, while Proteobacteria accounted for a smaller proportion. At the genus level, the staphylococcal load increased in CHP, and the Actinomyces and Veillonella loads increased in IPF.245 Staphylococcus nepalensis releases corisin, a peptide considered to be conserved in various staphylococci, to trigger the apoptosis of lung epithelial cells. This finding reveals the molecular basis for the elevation of Staphylococcus in IPF.246 The existence of specific members of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus is related to the progression of IPF and, in particular, to a poor prognosis of IPF patients.243 During bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice, dysregulated lung microbiota, such as Bacteroides and Prevotella dyregulation, promotes the formation of fibrotic pathogens through IL-17R signaling and drive IL-17B production through their membrane vesicles, thereby promoting lung inflammation and fibrosis.247 Notably, the reduction in gut microbiota alone did not affect the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, suggesting that dysbiosis of the lung microbiome may be the key pathogenesis of IPF.

Lung bacterial burden predicts fibrosis progression in IPF patients. Research has shown that the bacterial burden of IPF patients is twice as high as that of healthy people. It is closely related to the rate of decline in lung volume and the risk of death.244 Homeostasis of the lung bacterial community correlates with the expression‎ of host defense genes in peripheral blood.248 Among them, impairment of host defense and immune signaling is one of the factors influencing the severity of IPF.249 Patients with IPF who had progressive disease had significantly higher bacterial loads than those without progressive disease. The decrease in alveolar bacterial diversity was significantly correlated with an increase in the concentration of proinflammatory fibrotic cytokines and growth factors in the alveoli, which are also closely linked to IPF.250,251 It is worth mentioning that there is a positive correlation between alveolar IL-6, which has proinflammatory and profibrotic functions, and the relative abundance of Firmicutes. This may explain the acute exacerbation of IPF manifested by diffuse alveolitis and altered lung microbiota.252

Studies have shown that immunosuppression is associated with IPF progression, including autoimmune reactions and immune dysregulation.253,254 The lung microbiome also plays a nonnegligible role in the immune response to IPF. In IPF patients, increased Streptococcal abundance was related to increased nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor signaling, whereas lymphocytes expressing C-X-C chemokine receptor 3 were closely related to staphylococci. Downregulation of some immune response pathways, including the NOD, Toll, and RIG1-like receptor pathways, is associated with shortened progression-free survival (PFS). Ten of the 11 PFS-related pathways were associated with microbial diversity.39 A comprehensive analysis of genomic and microbial characteristics revealed a significant host response to more abundant or altered microbial communities, indicating that bacterial communities in the lower respiratory tract might serve as a persistent stimulus for recurrent alveolar injury in IPF.248

In summary, microbial-host interactions, which are important factors involved in the development of IPF, deserve further exploration. Moreover, some specific microorganisms (e.g., Staphylococcus and Streptococcus) have a strong connection with IPF progression, suggesting that more species need to be studied.

Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a respiratory disease in which there is permanent enlargement of parts of the lung’s airways, leading to a build-up of excess mucus similar to CF that can make the lungs more vulnerable to infection. Patients with bronchiectasis often develop acute infectious lung deterioration, characterized by fever, sputum and dyspnea.255

Sputum specimens from a large number of patients with bronchiectasis showed that Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were associated with severe bronchiectasis.256 The most common pathogen is H. influenzae, while P. aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) are the most common lethal pathogens.257,258 After acute exacerbation, the community composition showed little change, which means that some of the dominant flora did not correlate significantly with disease progression.229,259 However, a decrease in microbial diversity, especially that associated with Pseudomonas dominance, was correlated with a higher risk of bronchiectasis severity, frequency of deterioration, and mortality.260 This may be due to a reduction in the relative abundance of other organisms sensitive to macrolides during treatment with macrolides and a decrease in the overall diversity of the microbiota, leading to a higher relative abundance of Pseudomonas.261 Typically, chronic infection with P. aeruginosa is strongly associated with increased rates of disease progression and mortality.262,263 P. aeruginosa, Aspergillus fumigatus, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), or a combination of these may contribute to the acceleration of progressive lung injury.264,265

Although studies are more limited than those on bacteria, fungi, and viruses have also been proven to be involved in the process of bronchiectasis. For example, Aspergillus abundance changed considerably in patients with bronchiectasis compared with healthy controls. Its abundance was linked with the worsening of the condition, suggesting that Aspergillus may be an important cause of airway inflammation in some patients.266 Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus terreus predominate in bronchiectasis in Asian and European countries, respectively.266 In addition, a study of bronchiectasis in children showed that respiratory viruses, especially rhinoviruses, were found in 48% of the subjects.267 In research on Chinese patients with acute episodes of bronchiectasis, a significantly higher number of virus-positive samples were found in the acute phase than in the stable phase.268

Bronchiectasis is essentially a pathological endpoint that can be approached through numerous diverse routes, including abnormal permanent bronchial dilatation and airway obstruction.269 Approximately 50% of patients with bronchiectasis have no apparent or easily identifiable underlying cause.270 The incidence of bronchiectasis varies by race.271,272 Some scientists believe that bronchiectasis is related to the mucociliary clearance rate of the airways. The reduced clearance allows certain microorganisms to colonize the airway by releasing factors that suppress and destroy the ciliated epithelium. Such colonization behavior contributes to a nonspecific immune response in the organism, which ultimately leads to respiratory damage. This progressive lung injury further weakens the clearance mechanism, creating a vicious cycle.259 In a recent study, Neisseria subflava cultured from patients with bronchiectasis promoted the loss of epithelial completeness and inflammation in primary epithelial cells.273 Infection with neutrophilic airway inflammation is considered to be one of the main contributors to bronchiectasis,255,274 while high levels of active neutrophil elastase are correlated with low microbial diversity, especially with P. aeruginosa infection.275 Moreover, in an adult bronchiectasis cohort, the richness of Rothiaspecies was negatively correlated with proinflammatory markers in sputum, such as IL-8 and IL-1β and MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-9.276

In summary, bronchiectasis is a disease fueled by a vicious cycle of continuous bacterial infections and a process of environmental dysregulation, accompanied by tissue injury and damaged lung function. Nevertheless, we still lack clear insight into the immune-inflammatory pathways that influence this disease, and the relationship between the microbiome and specific mechanisms needs to be further explored.

Pneumonia

Pneumonia is an inflammatory condition of one or both of the lungs usually caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi and less commonly by other microorganisms. This disease is one of the most dangerous threats for young children and elderly people and can range in severity from mild to life-threatening.

Enrichment of the lower respiratory microbiota and oral bacteria (e.g., Prevotella, Streptococcus, Clostridium, Roseburia, and Veillonella) is correlated with subclinical inflammation.48,57 Studies of HIV-infected patients in Uganda and the United States have shown changes in the oral and pulmonary microbiota in antimicrobial-treated HIV-infected patients during acute pneumonia, as evidenced by reduced diversity and imbalance.202,277 Using a clustering method for sequencing data from 16S rRNA genes, lower respiratory tract samples from HIV patients with pneumonia can be organized into different groups. One group was dominated by Pseudomonadaceae. The second group is divided into two subclusters rich in Streptococcaceae or Prevotellaceae.278 The Pseudomonas-rich microbiome may suppress the virulence of potential pathogens and promote the restoration of the lung microbiome to a healthy state. Conversely, lower respiratory microbiota enriched in Streptococcaceae or Prevotellaceae may favor the persistence and multiplication of pathogens by promoting virulence factors or pushing nutrients into the alveolar cavity.100 Even the microbiome of patients with pneumonia varied depending on the clinical course. For example, patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia had a higher bacterial load in the intratracheal aspirate than controls but fewer bacterial species.279 In contrast, Pseudomonas, Corynebacterium, and Roseburia were more abundant in patients with pneumonia who were intubated, while Streptococcus and Prevotella were less abundant than in patients without pneumonia.280 In addition, the abundance of Firmicutes and Streptococci decreased in patients with interstitial pneumonia, and the abundance of Prevotella and Veillonella increased.281 After lung transplantation, subjects diagnosed with pneumonia had a reduced diversity of lung microbial communities, which were dominated by Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus.282 Some of the host’s immune mechanisms may be impaired due to dysregulation of the lower respiratory tract, thus increasing the susceptibility of individuals to pneumonia. For example, SCFAs such as butyric acid directly affect T-cell function by inhibiting the production of INF-γ and IL-17.194

The lung microbiome and pneumonia interactions are complex, dynamic, and bidirectional. Animal experiments have effectively demonstrated the relationship between the lung microbiome and the development of pneumonia. For example, sterile direct lung injury in mice resulted in an increase in lung bacterial content and a shift toward the excessive growth of specific colonies. When bacterial communities from such injured lungs were introduced into the lungs of healthy mice, they caused more inflammation and injury than bacteria acquired from uninjured lungs.283 Second, changes in the lung microbiota may affect the natural course of pneumonia in diseases such as COPD and CF, and patients with lower α-diversity may have a poorer prognosis and an accelerated rate of deterioration.284 Bacterial diversity was reduced in patients with intermediate and advanced COPD compared to those with early COPD. When infected with a new strain or a change in bacterial load, patients usually experience increased inflammation and rapid loss of lung function.285 The sudden appearance of bacterial pneumonia is characterized by a potential positive feedback loop; once started, the pro-growth signal is gradually amplified, forming a vicious cycle of homeostatic disturbance and increased inflammation.100 In addition, proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of pneumonia by reducing the clearance of gastric microbiota and increasing the migration of bacteria to the lungs.286 Early intensive care studies with probiotics have shown that probiotics can reduce the risk of pneumonia and shorten the stay of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.287 It is evident that the microbiome is strongly associated with the prognosis of critically ill patients. The emergence and progression of pneumonia also affects microbiome composition and homeostasis. Regardless of the cause of lung injury, an inflammatory cascade may be triggered, leading to an increase in alveolar catecholamine concentrations.288 In turn, it promotes the growth and virulence of selected bacterial community members so that alveolar inflammation persists for a long time.289,290

In short, by regulating cytokines and metabolites, the lung microbiome promotes inflammation that results in the progression of pneumonia. This regulatory mechanism is complex and bidirectional, implicating multiple diseases and influencing the composition of the lung microbiome. The interactions between the pulmonary microbiome and pneumonia require thorough study to manage the progression of inflammation and improve the prognosis of pneumonia patients.

COVID-19

As the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has firmly put pulmonary research firmly into the global spotlight, we separate research on the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 and lung microbiomes from pneumonia to highlight the progress in this area. Since the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 has been widely distributed throughout the world. By 2022, numerous variants of COVID-19 have emerged, making diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development extremely difficult. The role of the lung microbiome in this disease has not been clarified, but studies have found an association between the two. Pulmonary bacterial and fungal flora are associated with nonresolving ARDS in pneumonia, contributing to the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes in ARDS.43

From the literary analysis, we can conclude that the modulation of the gut and lung microbiome is promisingly envisaged as an adjuvant for the prevention or treatment of patients with COVID-19 due to the immunomodulatory properties associated with probiotics and prebiotics.291 To date, few clinical studies involving the use of probiotics in patients with COVID-19 have been completed, but all have found a reduction in the duration of illness and the severity of symptoms, such as fatigue, olfactory dysfunction, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Invasive mechanical ventilation is often required in critically ill patients, and the probability of successful extubation is closely related to the microbial load of the lung. Studies have shown that patients with an increased pulmonary microbial burden have a lower probability of recovery from invasive mechanical ventilation and a higher mortality rate.292,293 This may be associated with alveolar proinflammatory cytokines, and alterations in the pulmonary microbiota may affect the host immune response and increase alveolar inflammation.283 For instance, lung microbiome composition is related to changes in TNF-α, and microbial factors may activate inflammatory bodies, leading to IL-1β release.294,295 This experiment demonstrated that lung bacterial and fungal loads were associated with cytokines and alveolar inflammatory markers (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β) involved in the activation of inflammatory vesicles. These markers are associated with the development of ARDS, an important feature of severe COVID-19.296,297 Furthermore, the composition of the pulmonary microbial community in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS was linked with successful extubation but not with specific individual bacteria. This study provides new ideas for the prognosis of COVID-19 and the treatment of critically ill patients.43

Last, secondary infection of the epidemic is also a noteworthy issue. The bacterial culture results of Carter et al. showed that secondary bacterial pneumonia is related to a higher lung bacterial load compared to patients with negative BALF cultures.298

COVID-19 is primarily caused by respiratory viruses, and the pulmonary microbiome contributes to the development of severe pneumonia by promoting inflammatory responses and regulating cytokines. The specific alterations of the microbiome in COVID-19 need to be further explored for effective treatment and improved patient prognosis.

Lung cancer

Symbiotic microbiota have emerged as important biomarkers and modulators of oncogenesis and the therapeutic response to cancer. Nevertheless, our current understanding of the cancer microbiota is mainly restricted to the gut microbiota. As one of the mucosal organs with the largest surface area in the body, the lungs are in contact with diverse microorganisms by inhalation, either macro or micro. The lungs are colonized by various microbial communities under both physiological and pathological conditions.299,300 Scientists speculate that ecological dysregulation of the lung microbiome may also play an essential role in tumorigenesis at multiple levels. Perhaps by influencing inflammatory, metabolic, or immune pathways involved in cancer development.301,302 Although the impact of the microbiome on various cancers has been extensively explored,303,304 few studies have examined the interaction between lung cancer and the microbiome. Starting in 2018, researchers focused on the correlation between lung cancer and the microbiome and reported some interesting findings.

Lung cancer accounts for almost a quarter of all cancer deaths.305 Early epidemiological data show that bacterial infections are very common in patients with lung cancer. Up to 50–70% of lung cancer patients have pulmonary infections complicating the disease process.306 Pulmonary microbiota, including Chlamydophila pneumoniae (C. pneumoniae), M. tuberculosis, and respiratory viruses, may take part in the development and progression of cancer.307,308 The lung cancer microbiome exhibited differences in the relative abundance of several genera compared to healthy individuals. For example, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus levels were notably higher in patients with lung cancer, whereas the abundance of Streptomyces and Streptococcus was decreased in noncancerous tissues of cancer patients.24 By molding the neoplastic microenvironment and regulating the activity of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, ecological dysregulation of the lung microbiota can be a key contributor to lung cancer development.309,310 Dysregulation of pulmonary microbiome ecology or destruction of the gut-lung axis can lead to DNA damage, induce genomic instability, and alter host susceptibility to carcinogenic damage, resulting in lung cancer development.311,312 Microbiome dysbiosis causes a reduction in symbiotic microorganisms, and inflammation induces growth in bacteria. Bacterial toxins, including cytotoxic necrotizing Factor 1, cytolethal distending toxins, Bacteroides fragilis toxins, and bacteria-driven hydrogen sulfide and superoxide radicals, have been determined to trigger DNA damage to induce carcinogenesis.313,314,315,316 The microbiome and its metabolites also participate in the progression of chronic inflammation, as we described in the previous section.317 Stimulating the human lung cancer cell line A549 with products isolated from cancer patient-enriched bacteria was shown to promote the overexpression‎ of genes related to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling pathways.318 PI3K pathway activation has been suggested to be a process of carcinogenesis.207 Chronic inflammation is both a crucial feature of COPD and a potential driver of lung cancer development.319 Moreover, tuberculosis (TB) has been linked to lung cancer according to epidemiological studies.320,321,322 The study showed a significantly increased risk of lung cancer in patients with preexisting TB.321 This implies a strong relationship between lung cancer and TB and demonstrates the influence of the lung microbiome on lung carcinogenesis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main form of lung cancer, of which lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are the main subtypes.318 Sputum collected from lung cancer patients with LUSC and LUAD is rich in Veillonella, Neisseria, and phage.120 By analyzing the microbial composition of LUAD samples and comparing them with LUSC samples, scientists found differences in microbial composition and abundance between these subtypes.323,324 Among them, the presence of MCs in positive LUAD tissues was particularly critical and was linked with reduced CD36 and increased PARP1 levels.325 Moreover, the preoperative composition of lower respiratory tract microorganisms may be associated with early NCSLC recurrence because the microbiome of patients with postoperative recurrence differs from that of patients without recurrence.326 After comparing the BALF of NSCLC patients and noncancerous controls, they discovered significant differences between bronchoscopy samples and lobectomy samples. NSCLC patients have similar microbial communities to noncancerous subjects. Among them, the relative abundance of several bacterial taxa, such as Actinomycetota, Corynebacteriaceae, Dunaliellaceae, Corynebacterium, Rathayibacter, and Halomonas, was significantly lower.327 Scarce species, for example, Bacteroides pyogenes, Lactobacillus rossiae, Paenibacillus odorifer, Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense, Pseudomonas entomophila, and the fungus Chaetomium globosum, had significantly different abundances between NSCLC patients and noncancerous controls.328 These specific species were detected based on the subjects’ age, sex, and smoking status. The results showed that different subjects with different lung segments had different microbial compositions.24 Regarding detailed bacterial taxa, it was reported that the genus Thermus is more abundant in tumor tissue in patients with advanced disease, and the high levels of Legionella in patients who experienced metastasis imply a function for these bacteria in cancer progression.10 Another preliminary study paired lung tumor and distal normal tissue samples from the same region of the lung in 19 patients with NCSLC. It was concluded that patients with a higher diversity and abundance of lung microbiota in unaffected lung tissues had shorter disease-free survival and lower relapse-free survival rates.329 In conclusion, lung cancer is related to local microbiota dysbiosis, characterized by increased bacterial abundance, decreased α-diversity, and altered bacterial composition. The occurrence of lung cancer makes the lung microbiome of patients differ from that of healthy individuals, and dysregulated microorganisms act on cancer and influence its development and prognostic course.

Dysbiosis of the microbiome may affect not only tumor progression but also clinical therapeutic effects, especially that of immunotherapy.330 Patients with NSCLC treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics before immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy have a poor clinical prognosis.331 Similarly, airway enrichment before anti-PD-1 therapy was linked to adverse effects in lung cancer, suggesting that underlying resistance to immunotherapy can be ascribed to the lung microbiome.332,333,334 A high bacterial burden in tumors with an increase in inducible nitric oxide synthase expression‎ is a beneficial prognostic factor. In contrast, the combination of a high bacterial load and an increased number of forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3)-positive cells is a sign of poor prognosis.335 Therefore, the microbial burden of the tumor had two conflicting prognostic values, depending on the status of local antitumor immunity. The detection of resident microbial populations in tumors of different origins makes the microbiome a promising diagnostic marker for clinical purposes, and the lung is no exception. Studies have shown that neomycin and aerosolized vancomycin treatment reduce the implantation of lung tumors. According to this research, aerosolized antibiotic treatment resulted in a decrease in IL-10-producing Tregs and an increase in the activation of antitumor NK and T-cell responses, thus alleviating immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment.178 Shannon’s diversity index was significantly lower when comparing the bacterial community of subjects in the emphysema-only group with those of lung cancer patients.336 Furthermore, the abundance of the major phylum Proteobacteria was notably lower in lung cancer patients, while the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes was higher.336 The enrichment and homogeneity of the microbiome in patients with lung cancer were similar to those in patients with benign lung disease, while the functional differences in the microbiome varied by group.301 These changes in the lung microbiome may be markers of lung carcinogenesis and have the potential to be vital indicators for monitoring lung cancer. Consequently, sequencing of the airway microbiota may be a new genomic approach for the early detection of lung cancer and an opportunity to predict the risk of cancer development.337 Marshall et al. defined and validated a microbial-based classifier that predicts the development of cancer in patients without clinical signs of cancer before diagnosis. Their findings indicate the potential of utilizing lung microbiome analysis as a tool for the early detection of lung cancer.338

In addition to the bacteriome, the mycobiome also has an impact on lung cancer. For example, Blastomyces is highly preval‎ent in lung tumor tissue.339 However, it has not been clarified whether Blastomyces contribute to the lung cancer phenotype or are enriched because of the development of lung cancer. Moreover, enriched tumor-resident Aspergillus sydowii (A. sydowii) was identified in patients with LUAD, which participates in the progression of lung cancer. By inhibiting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity and PD-1 + CD8 + T-cell accumulation, A. sydowii promotes lung tumor progression through IL-1β-mediated myeloid-derived suppressor cells expansion and activation.340 In addition, the interaction between different inhabitants in the microbiome needs more studies for clarification. The latest research shows that the interaction between fungi and bacteria can trigger inflammatory responses. These inflammatory responses vary depending on the tumor category. Moreover, this interaction is associated with macrophages, showing the relationship between fungi and the body’s immune system.341

In conclusion, the lung microbiome is involved in cancer development, progression, treatment, and prognosis. Determining the mechanisms by which the bacterial community interacts with the mycobiome and virome will require further investigation. The relationship between the lung microbiome and cancer needs to be further explored from this perspective.

Vascular diseases

Microbial ecology shows a significant correlation with the pathology of many vascular diseases. The lung microbiome is considered to play a significant role in the morphogenesis of the respiratory tract,11,342 including the pulmonary capillary network.343 Vascular endothelial growth factor content is associated with lung microbial abundance, but determining the related mechanism requires more thorough research.344

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease that occurs in the pulmonary vascular system and features persistent vasoconstriction, vast regeneration, and in situ thrombosis.345 The lung microbiome has been proven to influence the outbreak and progression of PH, directly or indirectly. For example, as a mechanism driving the pathogenesis of PH, the systemic inflammatory response is related to the microbiome.16 In lung cancer patients, the microbiota of the respiratory tract was related to the upregulation of the PI3K pathway, which was usually activated in PH patients.206 Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and PI3K signaling pathways trigger the proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells and contribute to PH disease progression.346 The relative abundance of microorganisms in PH patients was significantly different from that in controls. Community diversity values were notably lower in PH patients than in reference subjects. The pharyngeal microbiota of the two groups of patients also showed different characteristics. In patients with PH, the proportions of Streptococcus, Lautropia, and Ralstonia were significantly higher than those in reference subjects. In contrast, the abundance of Haemophilus, Rothia, Granulicatella, Capnocytophage, and Sccharibacteria was greater in the controls. At the level of the glyph, the number of Bacteroidetes decreased and the number of Firmicutes increased in the PH group compared to the control group. All these changes in colonization were linked to the progression of PH, such as the upregulation of the PI3K pathway involved in Streptococcus. However, the mechanisms of Lautropia and Ralstonia still need to be explored.

Furthermore, diseases such as pulmonary edema and pulmonary embolism are also associated with microorganisms. For example, periodontal disease is a less common cause of infectious pulmonary embolism (SPE).347,348 In PD-SPE patients, a large number of Actinomycetes were found in the body, and after treatment with vancomycin and clindamycin, the patients’ lung disease was improved, which proved that Actinomycetes may cause PD-SPE.349 Moreover, when compared with control mice, ovalbumin (OVA) mice exhibited malignant states, such as pulmonary edema. The inflammatory cell content in BALF was reduced, and the inflammatory response was decreased after supplementing OVA mice with Lactobacillus. Meanwhile, TLR2/TLR4 expression‎ levels declined, with improved inflammatory cell infiltration in the airway mucosa, reduced alveolar swelling, and thinner basement membranes. This shows that Lactobacillus repressed TLR2/TLR4 expression‎ in OVA mice. Lactobacillus supplementation reduces the inflammatory response and suppresses pulmonary edema.350

In summary, more research is required on vascular diseases and lung microbes. Both the pathogenic mechanisms of each pathogen and other vascular diseases in addition to PH need more study.

Bronchitis

Bronchitis is a chronic nonspecific inflammation of the trachea, bronchial mucosa, and surrounding tissues, with symptoms mainly manifesting as pronounced cough, sputum production, shortness of breath, and recurrent respiratory tract infections. Patients with bronchitis of different etiologies contains different microbiomes.

The bacterial biomass and percentage of neutrophils, IL-8, and IL-1β in children with protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) were markedly higher than those in the control group. Compared to controls, the BAL microbiome of PBB children was different and divided into four distinct lineages. While some of them are mainly respiratory pathogens, others contain a greater diversity of microbiota, for example, Prevotella.351 In detail, enrichments of H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis (M. catarrhalis), and S. aureus were detected among cultured PBB microorganisms.352

Neutrophil inflammation in PBB kids is related to microbiome multiplicity. The remarkable correlation between bacterial biomass and inflammatory markers suggests that PBB inflammation is not attributable to a sole pathogenic species.351 Bronchitis with features related to Prevotella has symptoms similar to those of bronchitis with predominantly pathogenic bacteria. Consequently, it is recognized that bacteria that are not pathogens might also assist in the development of PPB inflammation. This explains the fact that some children with chronic cough and lower respiratory tract inflammation, but without cultured respiratory pathogens, still respond to antibiotic therapy.353,354

In addition, the lung microbiome was also strongly linked to the prognosis of bronchitis. In children with PBB, low airway infection with H. influenzae increased the rate of dilation of bronchial tubes by 7 times.355 Research on children with acute respiratory infections revealed that M. catarrhalis was related to children’s coughs that lasted 28 days.356 Early research on PBB also indicated the essential contribution of Neisseria and Streptococcus.357,358

The lung microbiome is also an important factor in obliterative bronchiolitis (BO). In a study of BO patients,359 all subjects exhibited a smaller respiratory community dominated by Aspergillus, and bacterial diversity was temporarily reduced with BO and correlated with neutropenia and antibiotic treatment. In particular, the increase in the number of Actinomycetes, Neisseria, and Pseudomonas was significantly relevant to the resistance to BO.360,361 It is noteworthy that with the increase in the richness of Aspergillus, the diversity of the bacterial community and the expression‎ of multidrug resistance genes both increased. Since the structure of the subject’s lung microbiota changes before the onset of inflammation and BO, these findings demonstrate that during the development of BO, host-microbe interactions facilitate the regulation of the immune response and exacerbate changes in inflammation and fibroproliferation.362 Moreover, features of the microbiome can be used to assess the prognosis of BO. For example, a gram-positive-rich lung microbiome can predict BO resiliency.363

Tracheobronchitis is characterized by high microbial diversity. The microbiome of tracheobronchitis is dominated by Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus and consists of a wider variety of phyla, including Actinomycetes, Firmicutes, Ascomycetes, Bacteroidetes, and Tenericutes.282 The elevation of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and MIP-1α, which are closely associated with tracheobronchitis, may result from a combination of dominant culture-positive bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa) and progressively depleting anti-inflammatory bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus).364 Compared with normal organisms, IL-17A levels were reduced in patients with tracheobronchitis, but cytokines associated with Treg upregulation (e.g., IL-20365 and IP-10366) increased. Microorganisms that induce Tregs and their cytokines, such as Bacteroides367 and Clostridium,368 are significantly increased in tracheobronchitis.

The composition of the lung microbiome is specific in different kinds of bronchitis, which complicates the relationship between the two. The composition of the lung microbiome is specific in patients with different species of bronchitis, which complicates the relationship between the two. However, every coin has two sides. Dynamic changes in the lung microbiome can be an indication to distinguish bronchitis and determine the progression of the disease.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease affecting multiple organs and is characterized by characteristic noncaseating granulomas. Several infectious agents have been suggested as possible pathogens of sarcoidosis, including Mycobacterium and Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes).369

The most abundant genera in sarcoidosis BALF were Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Veillonella,370,371 which is consistent with previous studies on the compositions of the healthy lung microbiome.31,57 The specificity lies in the fact that a taxon composed mainly of patients with sarcoidosis featured a microbiota monopolized by the Erythrobacteraceae family,370 as well as Mycobacterium372 and Propionibacterium acnes.373 In addition, Atopobium and Clostridium were abundantly present in the microbiota and associated with sarcoidosis.374 When comparing sarcoidosis with interstitial lung disease (LID), the abundance of taxa containing Haemophilus, Stenotrophomonas, and Enterobacter was considerably higher in the ILD group, while the abundance of Corynebacterium and Neisseria was higher in sarcoidosis.375 Moreover, compared to other ILDs, lung microbiome analysis on the basis of 16S RNA gene sequencing in sarcoidosis did not show obvious dysbiosis in patients, which may be related to the unknown pathological mechanism of sarcoidosis.376

The exact role of pulmonary microorganisms in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis is unknown, and there is a suggestion that they may trigger the formation of persistent granulomatous inflammation. This is because the granuloma observed in sarcoidosis has certain histological similarities to granulomatous diseases caused by pathogenic infections, such as leprosy and tuberculosis.377 One theory suggests that Atopobium and M. tuberculosis have underlying mechanistic relevance since they belong to the same bacterial phylum. For instance, exposure to Mycobacterium antigens through natural infection or BCG vaccination may induce an autoimmune response in susceptible individuals, leading to sarcoidosis.378 These two species may share highly conserved antigens that allow Atopobium to induce an immune response similar to that of M. tuberculosis in patients with sarcoidosis.379 The second possible mechanism is the autoantigen-like reaction triggered by the Atopobium antigen described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).380 Furthermore, Clostridium is a commensal bacterium of the respiratory and intestinal flora and is more aggressive in inflammatory environments381; thus, it could possibly be involved in the inflammatory response of sarcoidosis.

Propionibacterium acnes was once the only microorganism isolated from sarcoidosis specimens by bacterial culture.382 P. acnes has been found in granulomas and inflammatory cells of myocardial tissue,383 in preretinal granulomas from patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis,384 and in many other granuloma specimens.385,386 P. acnes was found in the BALF of most patients with sarcoidosis, and its presence was correlated with the activity of the disease. The existence of P. acnes was found in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of patients from various countries but was rarely detected in tuberculosis and lung cancer patients.387,388 Since Treg cells infiltrate heavily in patients with sarcoidosis, accompanied by a high level of associated cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, P. acnes may induce Treg cells by releasing propionic acid, resulting in the formation of granulomas in sarcoidosis.389

In short, sarcoidosis is affected by the microbiome in terms of the immune response. However, the exact role that the lung microbiome plays in pathogenesis needs to be explored.

Acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS

ALI/ARDS is a common clinical critical illness with a rapid onset and high mortality rate and is one of the major causes of death in critically ill patients.390 Its onset is closely related to sepsis, and the mortality rate of ARDS caused by sepsis is higher than that of ARDS caused by other factors.391

Sepsis-associated ALI/ARDS contributes to alterations in the lung microbiota in mouse models and patients. The etiology of pulmonary dysbiosis in patients with sepsis is complex and includes endogenous factors (e.g., hypoxia and ischemia‒reperfusion injury) and exogenous factors (e.g., tracheal intubation, pulmonary mechanical ventilation, and antibiotics). ALI is characterized by damage to the alveolar endothelium and epithelial barrier, the accumulation of inflammatory cells, and the onset of pulmonary edema.392 By injecting LPS into rats, several experiments have revealed significant dynamic changes in the diversity, composition, and function of the lung microbiota at different time points in response to fluctuations in systemic cytokine levels and the onset and regression of pulmonary edema. In detail, the bacterial DNA loading increased in BALF.283,393 In contrast, community complexity as measured by the Shannon Diversity Index was significantly decreased, and α-diversity was significantly decreased.184,394

The mechanism of sepsis-induced ALI/ARDS is complex and multifactorial, involving the release of inflammatory cytokines and disruption of the pulmonary microvascular barrier. Transient expression‎ of IL-1β induces acute lung injury and chronic lung repair, leading to pulmonary fibrosis. High expression‎ of IL-1β is accompanied by elevated levels of the local inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α and a strong acute inflammatory tissue response with signs of tissue damage. In terms of lung microbiota function, the abundance of proteins in four signaling pathways, the Wnt, Notch, chronic myeloid leukemia signaling pathway, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway-yeast (KO04011), was significantly negatively correlated with serum IL-1β and IL-10 levels, suggesting an association between lung microbiota and the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS.184

Disruption of epithelial and/or endothelial barrier function distinguishes ALI/ARDS from pneumonia. Severe hypoxemia is relatively rare in patients with pneumonia. In contrast, severe hypoxemia is a defining feature of ARDS and is thought to be a consequence of loss of alveolar-capillary barrier function.395 Similar mechanisms of cellular infection, invasion, and lysis caused by secreted factors of respiratory microbes may disrupt the integrity of the endothelial cell layer. For example, influenza viruses replicate in ciliated respiratory epithelial cells as well as type I and type II alveolar epithelial cells, disrupting the epithelial barrier and inhibiting alveolar cells from maintaining surface-active substances, which upsets the balance.396,397 The balance of epithelial injury and epithelial repair is affected by the lung microbiota and the host immune responses, which are central regulators of the development of ALI/ARDS.

In short, ALI/ARDS has a complex pathogenesis, including the disruption of epithelial and endothelial barriers and the dysbiosis of inflammatory cytokines. Both are closely related to the lung microbiome. Furthermore, cellular damage in ALI/ARDS occurs mainly through caspase-dependent pathways, causing cellular pyroptosis. The association of the lung microbiome with this pathway requires further study and this pathway may be an emerging therapeutic target.

Other diseases

Apart from the diseases mentioned above, other diseases of the lung are also linked to microorganisms but are less studied. We have summarized them briefly in this section.

Long-term administration of the anti-inflammatory drug roflumilast to mice with secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) immunodeficiency due to polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) deficiency prevents progressive tracheal wall remodeling and partial reversal of emphysematous alterations in SIgA-deficient mice. This implies that the invasion of SIgA-deficient trachea by bacteria is a major contributor to inflammation and emphysema in pIgR-deficient (pIgR-/-) mice. In addition, leukocytes recruited to airways with acquired SIgA deficiency can produce proteases that impair the airway wall, ultimately leading to fibrosis remodeling and airflow blockage. Products of activated leukocytes, involving MMP-12 and neutrophil-derived elastase, can destroy elastic fibers and additional elements of the alveolar septa in the vicinity of these small airways, ultimately leading to lobar central emphysema.398 In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that indole-3-acetic acid produced by the respiratory microbiome reduces emphysema and reduces lung function through IL-22-mediated macrophage-epithelial cell interactions. Intraperitoneal injection of indole-3-acetic acid into emphysema model mice reduced the decreases in lung function, emphysema, tissue damage, collagen deposition, and levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17A.223 By comparing the differences in sputum bacteria between pneumoconiosis patients and controls, scientists found an increased percentage of Streptococcus, Granuliococcus, and Bacillus in pneumoconiosis patients. Meanwhile, the microbiota of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis subjects had less Selenomonas.399

Compared to numerous studies about the lung microbiome and localized lung diseases, there is a great scope for exploring the correlation between the pulmonary microbiome and systemic diseases.

Therapeutic potential for lung disorders

The symbiotic microbiota has emerged as an important biomarker and modulator of tumorigenesis and the response to cancer therapy. It has also been widely studied as an essential tool for predicting the development and prognosis of lung diseases (Fig. 5). The microbiome-mediated pathogenesis of lung diseases has been profoundly explored from correlation to causation, especially in cancer.

Fig. 5

Therapeutic potential for lung disorders. The lung microbiome, as a long-standing commensal community in the lung, is involved in the development of and recovery from diseases. From disease prevention and treatment to disease prediction and prognosis and even lung cancer therapy, the lung microbiome can be further investigated as a promising target. First, clinicians can prevent health care-associated infections caused by bacteria through the discovery of next-generation probiotics. Second, by further narrowing the antimicrobial spectrum, new antimicrobial drug targets can be established to address the drug resistance of some bacteria and reduce the damage to unrelated commensal bacteria. Third, blocking bacterial colonization may reduce the ecological dysbiosis of commensal flora and prevent the onset or progression of diseases. During disease progression, the microbiome can predict disease prognosis and outcome. A dysregulated pulmonary flora often predicts worsening disease and poor outcomes, and the progression of disease further promotes dysbiosis, creating a vicious cycle that ultimately leads to an unfavorable clinical prognosis. Furthermore, the lung microbiome deeply influences the occurrence, progression, and prognosis of lung cancer. A dysregulated lung microbiome may trigger lung cancer pathogenesis through the upregulation of the ERK and PI3K pathways and upregulate Th17 cell, NK cell, and macrophage expression‎. The local microenvironment of tumors can be influenced by the clinical development of multiple targeted drugs. For example, these drugs can target the microbes themselves (e.g., phage) or their metabolites or target induced cytokines (e.g., IL-17) to recreate the specific microbiome and then reduce tumorigenesis or progression. (Figures are created with Servier Medical Art and exported under a paid subscription.)

Full size image

Prevention and therapy of lung diseases

Research on intestinal microbes has found that reestablishing a normal microbiome after antibiotic treatment can significantly reduce colonizing infections, especially those of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antibiotics have a sustained inhibitory effect, while steroids increase the relative abundance of many bacterial communities, such as members of the phylum Aspergillus (e.g., Moraxella, Pasteurella, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacteriaceae).400 Ongoing research explores commensal bacterial species that could be explored as the next generation of probiotics to rebuild or reinforce tolerance and prevent healthcare-associated infections resulting from highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria.401 By analogy, the role of the lung microbiome in disease prevention deserves attention.

Based on specific factors in the host response, such as the proliferation or reduction of specific colonies, new host-targeted approaches can be proposed for the prevention and treatment of lung diseases, such as targeting antibiotics to direct pathogenic elements of the microbial spectrum while leaving residual members of the microbial community undisturbed. Such interventions have the potential to address antimicrobial resistance, and patients may receive less antimicrobial therapy. As an example, in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, low-dose hydrocortisone reduced the risk of pneumonia in trauma patients, demonstrating the effectiveness of host-targeted therapy.402,403 Chronic H. influenzae infection contributes to Th17- and neutrophil-driven inflammation and steroid insensitivity in allergic respiratory disease. Consequently, the prevention of bacterial colonization may be a potential target for the adjuvant treatment of asthma and COPD.216 Influenza vaccination may also reduce secondary bacterial infections from Streptococcus.404 Since the composition, abundance, and predominant population of the lung microbiome change with the progression of the disease, in vivo, tests on the evolution of the microbiome can be performed to understand the changes in the status of the treated lungs. The most common sequencing technologies today include whole genome sequencing, NGS, and single-molecule real-time sequencing. There are differences in the diversity and abundance of microbiomes sequenced by different technological platforms, thus, the microbiome composition is influenced by the platforms and the bioinformatics pipeline.405,406,407 The viral, bacterial, and fungal compositions may be used to identify disease subtypes. Therapies targeting the microbiome may reduce the severity of the disease. For instance, chronic azithromycin therapy has been shown to reduce the frequency of COPD exacerbation, non-CF bronchiectasis, and CF.408,409,410 Probiotic administration may be an effective strategy to maintain or restore a functional microbiome, such as the use of probiotics for the prevention of allergic asthma.411 Several studies have examined the role of oral probiotics in the prevention of URT infections, with the majority (17 of 21) providing evidence of their beneficial effects.412 In vitro studies on cigarette smoke-induced diseases, such as COPD, demonstrated that the administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium breve eliminated the release of proinflammatory mediators from macrophages in response to cigarette smoke.413 Furthermore, oral administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus to lung cancer model mice treated with cisplatin showed a reduction in tumor volume and a higher survival rate.414

Scientists have conducted intensive research on the effects of gut microbial metabolites on disease and immunity. Unfortunately, the impact of lung microbiome metabolites on disease is an unexplored area. We attempted to uncover the function of metabolites of the lung microbiome, thereby providing new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of disease. First, metabolites can be ideal biomarkers of disease progression. They confer specificity to the lung microbiome when cultured. For example, water-soluble pigments make Pseudomonas easy to identify. Streptococcus does not breakdown inulin and is not bile soluble, while Pretus breaks down urea and migrates for growth. Moreover, for metabolite testing to be scalable and affordable, metabolite-based diagnostics facilitate cost reduction. Second, metabolites have a bright future in the treatment of diseases. Metabolites of the gut microbiome are important coordinators of host pathophysiology based on their influence on the body’s immune, inflammatory, and other processes. SCFAs, for example, as mentioned earlier, are protectors of the organism.415,416 SCFAs can inhibit the inflammatory response in the lungs in a GPR41-dependent manner.114 SCFAs also promote thymic peripheral Treg production through different mechanisms.417 Butyrate suppresses proliferation as a histone deacetylase inhibitor through epigenetic regulation of gene expression‎, thereby enhancing protection against infection.418,419,420 In addition to SCFAs, polysaccharide A inhibits the production of proinflammatory IL-17 and promotes the expression‎ of IL-10 by CD4 + T cells.128,367 However, the metabolites of the gut microbiome, which are mentioned above, have been intensively studied and systematically summarized. The metabolites of the lung microbiome, however, remain scattered. Haemophilus in the lung microbiome can produce polysaccharide A. Firmicutes can produce butyric acid and a small amount of propionic acid. However, scientists lack a systematic study of the metabolites of the lung microbiome. How these metabolites produced in the lungs differ from those produced in the gut and what specific effects they have on the organism deserve further investigation.

Prognosis of lung disease

The respiratory microbiome can independently predict the prognosis of various acute and chronic lung diseases. For instance, increased pulmonary bacterial load predicts the adverse outcomes of pulmonary fibrosis244 and critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.393 Reduced sputum bacterial diversity predicts mortality in COPD,421 and alterations in the microbial community predict deterioration of bronchiectasis422 and respiratory tract infections in children.423 In patients with bronchiectasis, differences in the respiratory microbiome were strongly correlated with the number of exacerbations that occurred in the following year.422 Changes in the lung microbiota also predict the response to inhaled antibiotic therapy in patients with bronchiectasis.424 Furthermore, pulmonary bacterial load predicted the development of chronic transplantation lung dysfunction or death within 500 days after bronchoscopy but was not specifically relevant to individual flora. This shows that the lung microbiome is a potentially modifiable but understudied risk factor for lung transplantation dysfunction.425

In critically ill patients, critical ecological factors affecting lung microbiota migration, elimination, and the relative colonization rates of respiratory microbiota are altered.426 In mechanically ventilated patients, inhalation of pharyngeal microorganisms is accelerated.427 Moreover, lung microbiome selectivity, such as cough, mucociliary clearance, and host immune defense mechanisms, is often impaired in critically ill patients as a result of both the disease itself and pharmacological interventions (e.g., sedation and corticosteroids).427 Thus, from composition to structure, the microbiome of critically ill patients differs dramatically from that of the healthy state. The most prominent bacterial taxa in the healthy respiratory microbiome (e.g., Prevotella and Veillonella) become rare in hospitalized patients. Conversely, the abundance of taxa associated with common diseases (e.g., Enterobacter and Staphylococcus) was relatively increased.52,428 In conclusion, ecological disturbances in critically ill patients may turn the pulmonary microbiota into a fragile ecosystem with catastrophic collapse due to the overgrowth of the dominant pathogen, which eventually results in the pathogen becoming the dominant population.

Cancer therapy

The human microbiota plays a critical role in initiating and promoting carcinogenesis and influences the prognosis and potentially the outcome of various malignancies. Examples of related cancers include cervical cancer, gastrointestinal tumors, lung cancer, and nasopharyngeal cancer.429 The lung microbiome is relevant to the prognosis and treatment of lung cancer. A lack of respiratory microbiota diversity in healthy subjects is a risk factor for lung tumorigenesis.430 The lung adenocarcinoma-associated microbiome increases the inflammatory response by activating lung-resident T cells, while germ-free mice or mice treated with antibiotics have a lower potential of developing lung cancer due to KRAS mutation/TP53 deletion.431 In addition, airway microbial components may trigger lung carcinogenesis by inducing signaling pathways in oncogenes, such as Streptococcus and Veillonella-induced upregulation of the ERK and PI3K pathways.206 Understanding and describing the lung microbiome, particularly in patients with early-stage lung cancer, may facilitate the discovery of therapeutic biomarkers for lung cancer. To determine the feasibility of microbial DNA as a distinguishing characteristic for early-stage tumors, by using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Poore et al. investigated the unique microbial signature present in the tissues and blood of 33 patients with primary cancer. In addition, considering the specificity of fungi in different cancers, scientists have attempted to identify features of circulating fungal DNA from 20 different fungi that may be used to distinguish pancancer from healthy individuals, demonstrating the utility of using microbiology in cancer diagnosis.341 Consequently, the possible use of the respiratory microbiome as a predictive biomarker is a promising area that urgently needs research.

Second, learning how the pulmonary microbiome affects the immune microenvironment in individuals with lung cancer may significantly impact the development of targeted therapies. Combining lung microbes with immunomodulatory drugs and immunotherapy may improve cancer prognosis. Therapies targeting lung cancer can aim to regulate the symbiotic lung microbiota to prompt a more tumor-suppressive environment. Inducing the microbiota to target the production of bacterial enzymes or byproducts is essential for tumorigenesis and the tumor immune response. These factors regulate the host biological effects produced by the pulmonary microbiome or the mechanisms that target the migration of bacteria into the lung. For example, intraosseous injection of vancomycin into mice resulted in altered lung microbiota,432, and intranasal infusion of Lactobacillus can activate respiratory immunity and improve resistance to viral infections.179 Analogously, the reduction in flora induced by nebulized antibiotic exposure decreased the implantation of tumors in mouse lungs and dramatically reduced lung metastasis.178 Furthermore, phages may be clinically studied against specific lung microbiota to transform lung cancer patients’ tumors and immune microenvironments into a more tumor-resistant environment.433 In addition, by understanding the composition of pulmonary commensal flora in lung cancer at the species or genus level, metabolic pathways present in the altered commensal community were examined for the development of targeted therapeutic agents against the metabolites. This type of altered metabolite, such as bacterial enzymes, in turn affects the local tumor microenvironment. Clinical research has shown that metabolites or peptides produced by the gut microbiome can act as ligands, which interact with host receptors and trigger downstream signaling. However, studies targeting the lung microbiome have not been completed.434 Owing to Th17 induction by the lung microbiome, combined with the fact that lung cancer is distinguished by an immune microenvironment rich in Th17 cell responses and IL-17 and other cytokine expression‎, we speculate that targeting IL-17 in combination with immunotherapy may improve the therapeutic responses of lung cancer patients. As an example, when treated with neutralizing antibodies, mice showed a significant reduction in IL-1β, tumor growth, and neutrophil infiltration.200 Up-to-date research has paid attention to the relationship between the lung microbiome and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Increasing microbiome leads to poor therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 therapy, as proved by certain research. However, the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on the microbiome has not been systematically concluded.

Conclusions and future perspectives

In this review, we retrospectively reviewed the history of research from the discovery of the lung microbiome and its composition, role, and connection with respiratory diseases. Most importantly, comprehensive research was undertaken to survey the effect of the microbiome on lung cancer. The theory that the lung was once considered a completely sterile site was gradually corrected with the development of sequencing technology. The lung microbiome was low in number and abundance compared to microbial communities in other sites, such as the intestine and the oral cavity. The main lung microbiome can be divided into the bacterial group, the mycobiome, and the virome. Most of the microorganisms in the lungs originate from the URT, such as Ralstonia, and are similar in composition to the oropharyngeal microbiome. Nevertheless, lung microbes have specific flora, such as Haemophilus, which the oral cavity does not. The lung microbiome of a healthy organism plays an important role in the maintenance of lung homeostasis by regulating the lung environment and modulating the immune response. The lung microbiome is not a permanent, stable collection of colonies but is fluid. This means that the lung microbiome is closely linked to the oral and intestinal microbiomes and they influence each other. Alterations or shifts in the oropharyngeal microbiome will affect the composition of the lung microbiome, while the gut-lung axis links the intestinal and lung microbiomes, affecting the whole body in one way or another. The gut-lung axis reveals the metabolic and immunologic relationship between these two organs. The gut microbiome regulates the immune response of the lung microbiome through the production of metabolites, such as SCFAs, while the lung microbiome can also influence the development of intestinal diseases through alterations in the gut microbial community. However, the exploration of the gut-lung axis is far from over. The genetic role of microorganisms and their metabolites in the lung has not yet been investigated. After decades of research, researchers have discovered a connection between the lung microbiome and a variety of lung diseases. These include asthma, COPD, CF, and the recent occurrence of COVID-19. The microbiome of the diseased lung is significantly different from that of the healthy state, and the number and abundance of the dominant genera, flora, and bacteria vary according to the disease. In turn, disorders of the lung microbiome contribute to the onset and exacerbation of diseases. The association between lung cancer and the microbiome has recently become a new trend. As a malignant lung disease, lung cancer is a major challenge for treatment. Researchers have found that the lung microbiome profoundly impacts the tumorigenesis, progression, and prognosis of lung cancer. Cellular DNA damage due to dysbiosis of the lung microbiome and chronic inflammation due to metabolites are triggers for lung cancer development. Moreover, increased microbiome abundance during cancer leads to decreased immunotherapeutic efficacy, and a high bacterial load leads to poor cancer prognosis. It is evident that the microbiome is involved in the whole process of lung cancer, and its changes and activities control the course of cancer. The microbial composition of lung cancer is different from that of healthy organisms, in which the metabolites of the microbiome, such as bacterial toxins, may be markers of lung cancer and help in clinical diagnosis and treatment.338

Looking ahead, we think about many more possibilities in the field of the lung microbiome. First, lung microbes and their metabolites could become diagnostic markers of disease progression. Different diseases, such as asthma and COPD, have different variations in microbiomes. The quantitative changes in the specific microbiome can assist in the rapid clinical diagnosis of disease and timely follow-up of treatment progress. For example, in a prospective cohort of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, increased bacterial load predicted a decrease in ventilator-free days.435 The metabolites are inexpensive and suitable for the diagnosis of lung diseases. In addition, metabolites can be administered with easily controlled pharmacokinetics, thereby reducing the risk of immune reactions associated with drugs. Second, in the emerging field of lung transplantation, the lung microbiome can predict chronic rejection or death.436,437 Bacterial DNA load is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in critically ill patients. Poor ICU prognosis can be forecast by the composition of the pulmonary microbiota of critically ill patients.393 Third, in the study of lung cancer, the lung microbiome can provide targets for tracking dynamic changes in cancer by its mobile, transient colonization characteristics. Furthermore, unlike other major sources of cancer heterogeneity, the lung microbiome can be easily modified by clinical intervention. The respiratory microbiome is a promising therapeutic target as a potential “treatable trait” for subphenotypic patients and for utilizing precision medicine.438 The addition of microbiome-specific therapies to the treatment of cancer can improve patient survival and prognosis.

Nevertheless, we still need to address the shortcomings of this research area. Most researchers report that sampling of the lung microbiome is flawed, i.e., oral and respiratory microbial contamination cannot be excluded.52,69,439 This limitation has resulted in the composition and function of the lung microbiome remaining incompletely characterized. Although current sequencing technologies, such as NGS, can identify most of the microbial communities present in the lung, there are still deficiencies. The detection of fungi and viruses is much more challenging than that of bacteria, so we lack a thorough study of these two members. There is still an absence of research on the correlation and interaction mechanisms between the lung microbiome and lung metastasis of other organ-derived tumors, such as breast cancer. Furthermore, our knowledge of the epigenetic-metabolic-lung microbiome relationship is still lacking. The effects of pulmonary microbial metabolites on the lungs and the whole body have not been systematically investigated. In the future, we should adopt more precise cutting-edge techniques to deeply explore the composition and role of the mycobiome and virome. More importantly, integrated biological approaches are required to explore the mechanisms of interaction between bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Determining the connection between lung metabolites and the immune system and the relationship between genes and lung microorganisms still require more research. Finally, we should expand the field of lung microbiology and diseases research to explore the connection between the lung microbiome and cancer development and metastasis at other sites and to eval‎uate the value of the lung microbiome more comprehensively.

References

1.  
2.  
3.  
4.  
5.  
6.  
7.  
8.  
9.