|
스피킹
1. I want to build a new library having a lot of reading materials and places for students to do group study. First fo all, students can get information they need to do their school assignment from the university library. They do not have to struggle in order to get the copies of reference book or visit local libraries in order to obtain some books they need. In the university library, students can write their paper or thesis conveniently.Moreover, if the university has some places for group study, it would be helpful for students' group academic work. Some students who want to do group study or have group discussion but have a difficulty with finding places to do so will be satisfied with the library.
2. I believe that bycycle will not replace other modern vehcles in the future because bycycle has a lot of benefits. Fist of all, people can stay healthy. In order to ride a bycycle, people have to move their body muscle, so they can develop body muscle and have good body shape. While exercising, people improve their health. Moreover, riding bycycle is eco-friendly. People do not have to use fossil fuels or gasoline in order to ride a bycycle. And bycycle does not cause any air pollution unlike most modern vehicels.
3. The male student strongly agress with the letter that the university should do something in order to draw students and faculty members' attention to university art exhibition. First of all, the male student argues that the idea of sending email which has link to art department website to students is a desirable idea. He says that the previous advertisement on art exhibition was not effective because it did not have visual factors and only consisted of text. Moreover, he maintains that it is good to move the time of art exhibition from the end of the semester to the middle of the semester. He says that students are too busy to go to watch art exhibition in the end of the semester, but the middle of the semester is good for them to enjoy art exhibition.
4. The lecturer explains his own experience in order to explain how teachers use ?? reduction in order to improve students' academic performance. According to the lecture, the professor taught students in elementary school. One of his students called Steven could not finish his assignment all the time, because he always gazed out of the window, sitting near the window. Then the professor made a change. He rearranged the sit so that Steven could sit far from the window. By separating Steven from distracting factor, the professor could help steven concentrate on his academid work and show better academic performance. All the process that I am talking about is exactly explaining ?? reduction.
5. The male student has a problem because he has a schedule conflict between his literature class and basket ball game on thursday night. Given the choice between two possible solutions, I would choose the second option if I were in the man's situation. If the man chose to take the literature course, even though he cannot join basket ball gameson thursday, he can still enjoy the game on Tuesday night. On the other hand, if he chose to take other literature class, it would be helpful for him because he is not interested in the other classes.
6. The lecturer explains how some plant species and insects cooperate with each other. According to the lecture, some insects protect certain plants from harmful insects while obtaining food from the plants. There are two types of this kind of mechanism. First of all, some plants like ?? release chemical compounds into the air so that their friendly insects can detect it. If friendlt insects life lady bugs get to the plants they eat the harmful insects. Second, some plants like ?? keep friendly insects like ant around themselves by providing them with sweet substance. So when harmful insects attack the plants, ants eat away the harmful insects.
통합형
In the lecture, lecturer argues that limiting menhaden fishing is the most available solution to deal with the decline of menhaden population. This casts doubt on the reading's idea that the proposal is not effective.
To begin with, the lecturer maintains that reducing striped bass population will distrupt the ecological balance because striped bass play an important role in controlling other species' population. She adds that limiting menhaden fishind will not destroy ecological balance. This refutes the reading's idea that the government should reduce striped bass population in order to protect menhaden, because stiped bass eat a lot of menhaden.
Moreover, the lecturer asserts that there are other supplies of protein, such as soi bean. She explains tht soi bean can provide livestock and poultry with great amount of soi bean and there has recently been surplus of soi bean. This rebuts the reading's point that restricting menhaden fishing will have negative impact on agriculture in terms of reducing the amount of protein for livestock and poultry.
Lastly, the lecturer cotends that the decline of local economy caused ny prohibition on menhaden fishing will not last for a long time. She suggests that if the number of menhaden dramatically decreases due to the lack of restriction on menhaden fishing, the whole menhaden industry will collapse. This contradicts the reading's idea that preventing people from fishing enough amount of menhaden will cause jobless people and economic recession.
독립형
Over tha past a few decades, it has been generally argued about where the government should spend its budget on. Some people might believe that the government should invest money on only practical tthings; nevertheless, other people might disagree with it. However, I am convinced tha the government should spend money for not only practical use but also for aesthetic purpose. Actually, I have a couple of reasons for my assertion. I will clearly show and develop why I maintain my insistence as specifically as I can in the next following paragraphs: improving the quality of people's lives and making good impression of the nation.
To begin with, the government should consider aesthetic factors when spending money in order to enhance the quality of people's lives. If the government is merely intested in practical project, such as the construction of. high ways, the government cannot help people enjoy high-quality lives. On the other hand, if the government tries to clean and beautify the government, it can contribute to increased quality of people's lives. For instance, several years ago, there has been confict regarding wherher the government should construct roads or build a new park in Seoul, the capital city of my country, Korea. The government eventualy decided to build a park in thle center of Seoul, which was blamed by a lot of people. Yet, realizing that the park offers people opportunity to enjoy nature and places to take a rest, people began to praise the government's decision in terms of improves quality of lives.
Moreover, the government should take the beauty of the nation into account so as to make good image of the nation to foreigners. Although some people might say that the beauty of the nation and the city has nothing to do with giving good impression of the natio to visitors, it does not take a genius to know that preserving beautiful historical remains and artifacts in the nation will allow the country to make good impression of itself to visitors and tourists. In fact, KSC, Korean Statistical Center in South Korea conducted a survey on 1000 students attending in Seou National University pertaining to whether preserving historical remains and artifacts helps the nation make good image of itself. Interestingly, about more than 80 percent of them replied that foreigneres would think positively about the country it the nation has beautiful historical remains and artifacts. This clearly show that they government should spend its budget so that the nation can enhance aesthetic element of the city and the nation.
To summarize the points made in the paragraphs above, I concretely believe that the government should spend money for both practical and beautiful factors in terms of improving the quality of lives making good image of the nation
|
첫댓글 아직 쓰고있는 중?
스피킹5번까지 보이네!
홧팅
선생님 통합형 라이팅에서 정부의 정책이 menhaden fishing을 규제 하는 거였잖아요?
근데 계속 limit, regulate 쓰다가 paraphrase 한답시고 prohibit 한번 썼는데 문제가 될까요?
노프라블럼!
문맥상 그게 그뜻으로 통한다!
그래서 동의어는 7-8개를 섞어서 익히면좋다!
홧팅!
리딩과 리슨닝도 간략하게 올려라!
홧팅
후기정리가 최고의 리뷰다!
담셤에 반드시 영향을 줄것이다! 홧팅
리딩: 오늘 리딩은 좀 어려웠어요. 첫 지문이 어려워서 뒤의 두개는 쉬울 줄 알았는데 세 지문 모두 제가 싫어하는 주제라서... 다 풀고 첫째 지문을 검토하려고 했는데 그럴 시간이 없었어요
리스닝: double answer question이 많아서 좀 까다로운 것 뺴고는 어제보다는 쉬웠어요
그래 넘넘 고생 많았다!
이젠 이번주 셤을 준비하잣!
홧팅!