Reporter: Sean Darks, chief executive of CitiWatcher.com didn’t want to ask his employees to do anything he wouldn’t do. So he had this chip in banded under his skin. The chip has access code _____ into room holding security footage government agencies and police.
For Darks, the tiny chip is a security solution. No ID’s for employees to loose, they can’t. It’s right there, in their arm.
Darks: “Actually, it is inexpensive solution, verses retino-scan or of a finger print ID. Those solutions are rather expensive. This solution is inexpensive as far as compare to those.”
Reporter: Less expensive, in less secure? The chip themselves don’t contain any personal information but they do contain the key to information. Unequipped information, that Jonathan Westews, software developer in Canada says he found relatively easy to copy. Meaning he could become Sean Darks in the eyes of machine if he want it to. Then there is an issue of privacy in whether employers might start demanding employees get the chip implanted as a form of ID.
Scott Silvermam (Applied Digital): Certainly you have a choice on whether not you wanna take employment somewhere but as we market through our distributors to the employer community, one of the things we emphasize in the privacy policy and the materials are distributed, in the fact that the product should be a voluntary product.
Reporter: Sounds good! But people were work on Privacy Issues point out that the workplace seen a steady erosion of privacy rights.
Marc Rotenberg (Exec. Director, EPIC): In the 1980’s you know, you take polygraph to test to get a job, and 1990’s there was a drug testing, little later on as we reading your e-mail, and each step along the line, we start to asking question, you know, is the law going to create any zones of safety?
Reporter: When and where is that line get drawn? Privacy Right Group ______ the image of Big Brother watching. Some on the Christian Right called them “The Mark of Satan” The people contemplate to the future, or excited about the possibilities, after all, it just puts this much closer to realize the marketers’ dream is shown in this scene from the movie Minority Report.
Bill Tucker CNN, New York
하느라고 했는데, 몇 군데 안들리는 곳이 있네요..
틀린 부분이 있다면 지적해 주시구요..^^
다니엘님처럼 번역가능하신분 부탁드릴께요..
예전에 공부를 좀 열심히 할 걸 그랬네요.. 주님께 영광이 되게 말이에요..^^
첫댓글 정말 수고하셨습니다..... 감사합니다..
shekinah glory님 반갑습니다.^^그리고 너무 수고하셨습니다.좋으신 우리 주님께서 우리 카페에 은혜를 주셔서 서로 합력하여 이렇게 아름답게 동역케 하시네요.주님께서 님들의 수고를 잊지 않으실것입니다.감사드리며...마라나타^-^
위에서 두번째 빈칸은 안들리고.끝에서 4번째칸은 'impute'같습니다. '사생활권리 협회에서는 대형 감시체계의 영상을 비난하고 있다' . 그리고 다음 문장은 satan 이 아니라 six 로 들리는데요. (사탄은 '세이튼'이라 발음) 크리스쳔권에 있는 일부사람들은 그것들을 6의 표로 부른다. ((6의 표로 안보는 사람도있다는뜻))
Emerald님 반갑습니다.너무 감사합니다.저번에도 베니힌 목사님 메시지 번역해주셨는데...귀하신님께 주님의 은혜가 더하시길...마라나타^-^
'impute'을 알려주셔서 감사합니다.. Emerald 님... 근데 영어권에서는 satan의 끝부분을 강하게 발음하지 않거든요.. 우리나라 발음으로 거의 '음'과 '은'의 발음을 합쳐놓은듯이 아주 짧게 발음을 합니다('은'에 더 가깝겠네요, t 소리는 아~주 적게 들리구요).. six일 경우 x 발음이 satan의 끝부분 보다 강합니다..
Well.... you know something... Great... I'll treat Next step.....Thanks again.... Shekinah Glory........God bless you...He Knows......Everything.......
물론 사람마다 발음의 강약이 조금씩 차이가 있겠지만요...^^ 이제 첫 번째 단어만 알아내면 되겠네요^^
permitted in the room ? 전후 문맥으로 보면 이 단어가 유사하게 맞지 않을까 추측.....