‘돼지독감’이 人工的이라는 놀라운 새 증거

[이브]

Startling New Evidence That The 'Swine
Flu' Pandemic Is Man-Made

 

                                                     ‘돼지독감’이 人工的이라는 놀라운 새 증거

Novartis Patent Detailed And Mass Murder Charged
By A. True Ott, PhD, ND
7-26-9

 

Murder suspects are either convicted or acquitted at trial based on the prosecution's presentation of EVIDENCE which usually hinges on MOTIVE, OPPORTUNITY, and TIME-LINES combined with physical documents. To gather such hard evidence, detectives and/or federal agents often spend months following leads and interviewing witnesses. In the trial phase, re-creating the sequence of events is essential. I submit this paper will provide more than enough hard evidence to at least result in a series of criminal indictments of charges of MASS MURDER, and CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT WORLD GENOCIDE against Novartis Pharmaceutical principals and agents and others.

 

PRIMARY MOTIVE

 

The Primary Motive behind this alleged criminal activity is also the primary cause of most murders in the world today, and that motivation is simply: BIG MONEY. Billions of Dollars of windfall profits from government contracts worldwide, as a matter of fact.

I will provide evidence that will show that Novartis Pharmaceuticals of Basel, Switzerland has conspired with corrupt "scientists" at the U.S. Army Institute of Pathology ­ Ft. Detrick, Maryland, to create a "novel" strain of weaponized "influenza" virus by means of "reverse engineering" the deadly 1918 killer strain ­ which strain was maliciously and surreptitiously released upon the world in March and April of 2009 for the primary purpose of creating a panic-stricken world-wide demand for Novartis vaccine material.

 

 

주된 動機

범죄 활동으로 주장되는 이 활동 이면의 주된 동기는 오늘날 세계에서 일어나는 대부분의 살해의 주된 원인이기도 하고 그 동기는 간단하다: 큰 돈. 사실 상, 세계적으로 정부 계약에서 나오는 수십 억 달러의 不勞所得.

스위스 바절에 있는 노바티스제약은 미국 육군 병원체연구소에 있는 부패한 과학자들과 음모하여 악명 높았던 치명적인 1918 킬러 變種 - 그 변종은 노바티스 백신의 공황 상태의 월드와이드 수요를 만들어 낼 것을 주목적으로 하여 2009. 3~4월에 악의적으로 그리고 비밀리에 세상에 내놓은 - 을 “리버스 엔지니어링(逆設計)”에 의해 무기화한 “독감”바이러스라는 “잘 알려지지 않은” 변종을 만들어냈다는 것을 보여주는 증거를, 나는 제공할 것이다.

 

The evidence will also clearly show that the Novartis vaccine material is in reality designed to facilitate the further mutation of the pandemic into more lethal waves of increasingly virulent and deadly disease, rather than to curtail and limit the existing outbreak. The evidence will show that Novartis is willingly being used, (and extremely well-paid) to facilitate the edicts of the global elite's Club of Rome; which edicts clearly call for a massive and sudden depopulation of certain segments of the earth's human population.

 

 

노바티스 백신 물질은 사실상, 기존에 발생한 것을 줄이고 제한하기 보다는 점점 더 유독하고 치명적인 波長의 유행병으로 더욱 變異되게 만들어져 있다는 것을 증거가 분명히 보여줄 것이다. 그 증거는, 세계 엘리트의 로마클럽 勅令(布告)을 용이하게 하기 위해(그리고 극히 후한 대가를 받았다) 노바티스가 기꺼이 이용되고 있다는 것을 보여줄 것이다; 그 칙령은 지구 인구의 어떤 부분의 대대적이고 갑작스러운 인구감소를 분명히 요구한다.

 

PRIMARY EVIDENCE

 

To realize such windfall profits on an engineered, global flu pandemic, detailed covert planning must take place of course.

Patents protecting the proprietary flu vaccine must be applied for and secured before the pandemic virus is released in order to minimize the competition and maximize the profit potentials. In a biological attack of this nature, timing is extremely critical.

Indeed, the evidence is clear ­ Novartis applied for just such a patent on Nov. 4, 2005, and the U.S. Patent Office accepted this application and granted US 20090047353A1 for a "Split Influenza Vaccine with Adjuvants" on February 19, 2009. (See bottom of page).

주된 증거

만들어낸 세계적 독감 유행병에서 그런(어마어마한) 불로소득을 실현시키기 위해서는, 은밀한 세부 계획이 있어야 하는 것은 물론이다.

경쟁을 최소화하고 잠재 이익을 극대화하기 위해서는 유행병 바이러스를 방출하기 전에, 그 독점적 플루백신을 보호하는 특허를 신청하고 확보해야 한다. 이런 성질의 생물학적 공격에 있어서 타이밍이 극히 중요하다.

사실 그 증거는 분명하다 - 노바티스는 2005.11.4. 그런 특허를 신청했고 미국 특허청은 이 신청을 받아들여, 2009.2.19. “보조약과 함께 분리(분할)된 플루 백신”에 대해 US 20090047353A1 특허를 내주었다(아래 참조).

 

With this patent now secured, the conspirators were now free to create the demand for their "novel" split influenza vaccine by releasing a "novel" split-influenza (combining multiple viruses) pandemic virus from a weapons lab test-tube into unsuspecting human hosts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/17/AR2009061703271.html

이 특허를 받아 놓고 음모자들은 이제, 무기 시험실 시험관으로부터 나온 “잘 알려지지 않은” 분리 독감(多種 바이러스를 조합한) 유행병 바이러스를 의심하지 않는 인간 宿主에게 방출함으로써 그들의 “잘 알려지지 않은” 분리(분할)독감백신의 수요를 마음대로 만들어내고 있다.

 

The so-called "Swine Flu" grabbing headlines today is actually a recombinant, or "split-influenza" virus consisting of A-strain Bird-Flu (H5N1), Swine Flu (H1N1) and multiple strains of human flu (H3N2). Likewise, the 1918 Killer Flu that killed untold millions of people was a recombinant or "split-influenza" virus composed of Bird flu, Swine Flu, and multiple strains of human flu.

오늘날 해드라인을 장악하고 있는 소위 “돼지독감”은, 실제로 再組合型, 즉 A변종 조류독감(H5N1), 돼지독감(H1N1), 그리고 多種의 인간 독감(H3N2)으로 구성된 “분할-독감” 바이러스이다. 마찬가지로, 말해지지 않은 수백만 명을 죽인 1918년의 킬러 플루는 재조합형 즉 조류독감, 돼지 독감 그리고 다종의 인간독감으로 구성된 “분할 독감”바이러스였다.

 

CRIMINAL TIMELINE

 

The criminal timeline begins in 1997, when Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger assembled a team of geneticists and microbiologists to analyze the genome structure, and then to REPRODUCE (i.e. reverse engineer) what is arguably one of the most deadly viral structures the world has ever been cursed with ­ the 1918 killer flu virus. According to numerous published stories and reports, Taubenberger and his team utilized super-computers to map the complex RNA and DNA structures of the killer virus, then utilized human plasmids to successfully re-create the 1918 killer. Taubenberger completed his work in early 2005, then immediately left the employ of the U.S. Army at Ft. Detrick to take a much more lucrative position with the National Institutes of Health. His new focus was to create a VACCINE against the very same 1918 killer flu that he and his team had, just months earlier, successfully "reverse engineered" and created.

범죄 타임라인

범죄 타임라인은 1997년에 시작되었는데, 그 때 제프리 타우벤버거박사는, 세계가 1918년 킬러독감 바이러스로 저주 받은 가장 치명적인 바이러스 구조의 하나의 게놈(지넘)구조를 분석하고 재생산(즉 리버스 엔지니어링)하기 위해 한 팀의 유전과학자와 미생물학자들을 모았다.

발간된 수많은 이야기와 보고서에 따르면, 타우벤버거와 그의 팀은 수퍼 컴퓨터를 이용하여 그 킬러 바이러스의 복잡한 RNA와 DNA 구조의 지도를 작성한 후 1918년 킬러를 성공적으로 재창조하기 위해 인간 플래즈미드(자기 복제로 증식할 수 있는 유전인자)를 이용하였다.

2005년 초 이 작업을 완료한 직후,  타우벤버거는  Ft. Detrick에 있는 미육군 고용직을 떠나 NIH(국가보건연구소)에 더 이득이 생기는 자리로 옮겼다. 그의 새로운 초점은 몇 달 전에 그와 그의 팀이 성공적으로 “역설계”하여 만든 1918년 킬러 플루와 똑 같은 것에 대한 백신을 만드는 것이었다.

 

This researcher is very confident that a focused criminal investigation would likely reveal prima facia evidence that Taubenberger was in reality working for Novartis while employed with the N.I.H. ­ and was quite likely the primary author of Novartis' Nov. 6, 2005 "provisional" patent application. On page 2, paragraph 32 of the patent publication we read, quote: "The influenza virus [that the 'invention vaccine' is designed to protect against] may be a reassortant strain, and may have been obtained by reverse genetics techniques. Reverse genetics techniques allow influenza viruses with desired genome segments to be prepared in vitro using plasmids." The remnant of the paragraph then goes into very specific detail as to the actual mechanics of how the pandemic virus was actually created by Taubenberger's Ft. Detrick team. At the very least, the author of the patent application had to have studied Taubenberger's various published reports on his work at Detrick, for the wording and science is virtually verbatim.

이 연구가는, 집중적인 범죄 수사를 하면 타우벤버거가 NIH에 고용되어 있는 동안 실제로 노바티스에 일하고 있고 노바티스의 2005.11.6. “임시”특허 신청의 주된 저자라는 주된 간판 증거가 드러날 것을 아주 확신했다. 특허 공보 패러그래프 32 페이지 2에서 우리는 다음과 같이 읽을 수 있다: “그 독감 바이러스는 재조합형 변종일지도 모르고 유전자 역설계 기술로 획득되었을지도 모른다.

유전자 역설계 기술로, 플래즈미드를 이용하여 시험관에서 원하는 지넘(게놈) 부분을 가진 플루 바이러스를 마련할 수 있다.” 그 패러그래프의 나머지는 타우벤버거 팀이 실제로 유행병 바이러스를 어떻게 만들었는지 그 실제 내용에 대해 아주 구체적으로 자세히 설명되어 있다. 언어 표현과 과학은 사실상 縮語的이므로, 그 특허 신청 작가는 최소한 타우벤버거가 데트릭에서 일할 때 발간한 여러 가지 보고서를 연구해야 했다.

 

Furthermore, this paragraph is even more damning by the words "may have been obtained". Who "obtained" this virus and for what reason was it "obtained"? Keep in mind the CDC and HHS would have Americans believe that the pandemic viral outbreak is totally a "natural" occurrence ­ if so then how could Novartis have such an incredible advance knowledge to the point of developing a vaccine with such absolutely PERFECT TIMING???

더욱이, 이 패러그래프는 “얻어졌을 지도 모른다”는 말로 더욱 욕보이고 있다. 누가 이 바이러스를 “획득했으며” 무슨 이유로 그것이 “획득되었는지”?  CDC(질병관리센터)와 HHS는, 그 유행병 바이러스의 발병이 전적으로 “자연적인” 발생이라고 미국인들이 믿게 했을 것을 명심하자. - 만약 그렇다면(자연발생이라면) 노바티스는 그렇게 절대적으로 완벽하게 때맞춰 백신을 개발할 정도로 믿을 수 없이 앞선 지식을 어떻게 가지게 되었을까???  

WHO EXACTLY IS "NOVARTIS"??

 

Novartis International AG is simply the world's largest, multi-national pharmaceutical company with over $53 Billion USD revenue generated in 2008. It's headquarters is located in Basel, Switzerland, home of the vaunted "Swiss Guards" who provide all security measures for the Vatican and the Club of Rome. The company logo symbolizes the "eternal flame" of the Illuminati "enlightened ones". Dig into Novartis International AG's long history, and one finds that it began as a component of the infamous I.G. Farben combine, which in turn was primarily responsible for the rise of Adolph Hitler and the German/Austrian Third Reich.

정확히 “노바티스”는 누구인가??

노바티스 인터내셔널 AG는 간단히 세계 최대, 다국적 제약회사로 2008년에 530억 달러 이상의 수입을 올렸다. 그 본사는, 배티컨과 로마클럽에 모든 안전 조치를 제공하고 있는 자랑스러운 “스위스 가드”의 고향인 스위스 바절에 위치하고 있다. 그 회사의 로고는 일루미나티의 “각성한 자들”의 “영원한 불꽃”을 상징한다. 노바티스 인터내셔널 AG의 오랜 역사를 들여다보면 그 회사는 악명 높은 IG 파벤 합병 으로 시작해서 아돌프 히틀러와 독일/오스트리어 제 3 독일(제국)의 출현에 주된 책임이 있다.

 

Dig a bit deeper and you find that Novartis also wholly owns a company called Sandoz ­ which was the inventor of LSD and other strong hallucinogenic "truth" drugs, and was the supplier of LSD to the CIA allowing them to scale new heights with their covert "MK ULTRA" mind control experiments. Documents released to U.S. Congressional investigators in 1977 show that Sandoz Labs had arranged for certain Nazi scientists to gain new identities in Allen Dulles' CIA at the conclusion of WWII. This was accomplished under a secret extraction program called "Operation Paper Clip".

좀 더 깊이 파 보면 노바티스는 또한 산도스라고 하는 회사를 전적으로 소유하고 있는 것을 알 수 있는데, 그 회사는LSD와 기타 강력한 환각유발제인 “진실”약의 발명했고, CIA가 그들의 은밀한 “MK 울트라” 마인드 컨트롤 실험으로 새로운 도약을 하게 한 CIA에 LSD를 공급책이었다. 1977년에 미 의회 조사팀에 공개된 문서들은, 세계 2차 대전이 끝날 때 어떤 나치 과학자들이 앨런 덜레스의 CIA에서 새로운 身元을 얻게, 산도스 실험실이 주선한 것을 보여준다. 이것은  "Operation Paper Clip"이라고 하는 비밀 혈통 계획 하에서 이루어졌다.

 

The address listed on the Novartis Patent applications is a P.O. Box in Emeryville, California. Up until the summer of 2005, this Emeryville California address belonged to Chiron Inc. ­ the world's second-largest INFLUENZA VACCINE MANUFACTURER. Chiron was doing very well, with reported sales of $357 million in fiscal 2002. Chiron's sales nearly doubled, peaking at a whopping $678 million in 2003 ­ and it was mostly due to the marketing and sale of FLU VACCINE CONTRACTS to the federal government. Novartis, which owned much of Chiron's stock, was very pleased, until disaster struck in 2004 --- the entire year's stock of flu vaccine was found to be contaminated and was condemned.

노바티스 특허 신청에 나온 주소는 P.O. Box in Emeryville, California이다. 2005년 여름까지 이 주소는 세계 제 2의 독감 백신 제조회사인 카이런에 속했다. 카이런은 2002 회계연도에 보고된 매출이 3억 5700만 달러로 아주 잘 나가고 있었다. 카이런은 2003년에 6억 7800만 달러를 올리면서 절정에 올라 거의 2배의 매출을 올렸고 - 그것은 대부분 연방정부에 독감 백신 계약의 영업과 판매에 기인한 것이었다. 카이런의 주식을 많이 소유한 노바티스는 2004년에 재난(한 해의 플루 백신 전체 재고가 오염된 것으로 드러나 폐기되었다)을 당할 때까지 아주 즐거웠었다.

 

Stock values plummeted on the news. With the stock at a historic low, Novartis quickly purchased the remainder of Chiron's stock and began immediately to work on the massive "novel pandemic flu" vaccine that they somehow knew would soon have worldwide demand ­ especially if they controlled the exclusive patent they could effectively "corner the pandemic flu vaccine market"!!

주식가가 뉴즈에서 폭락했다. 주식이 역사적으로 추락하여 노바티스는 재빠르게 카이런의 나머지 주식을 매입하여, 곧 세계적인 수요가 있을 것(특히 만약 그들이 독점적인 특허를 컨트롤한다면 유행병 플루 백신 시장을 효과적으로 독점할 수 있다!!)이라고 그들이 안 “잘 알려지지 않은 유행병 독감”백신을 즉각 대대적으로 작업하기 시작했다.

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/09/02/BUGULEGTV61.DTL&type=business

 

OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES

 

I would submit that killing tens of thousands of innocent humans via the systemic creation of a "pandemic" in order to make billions of dollars is vile enough, but there is also evidence that there is an even more heinous hidden agenda at work here, and it is spelled GENOCIDE.

기타 범죄 행위

수십 억 달러를 벌기 위해 조직적으로 “유행병”을 만들어 수십만 명의 무고한 인간을 죽이는 것도 충분히 비열한 짓이지만, 여기 더욱 가증스러운(흉악한) 감춰진 계획이 있다는 증거도 있고 그것은 GENOCIDE라고 제시한다.

 

It is no mystery that Adolph Hitler advocated the elevation of a Nordic "Master Race" that would rule the world in a "New Order of the Ages" called the "Third Reich". Sadly, not all of the EUGENIC/GENOCIDAL National Socialists were executed at Nuremburg.

In reality, the elite financiers that actually dictated the agenda to Hitler, merely went underground, willing to bide their time until their godless agenda to liquidate BILLIONS of people could be successfully implemented.

이른바 제 3 독일(제국)이라고 하는 “새시대 질서”에서 세계를 지배할 노르딕 “매스터 인종”의 높힘을 아돌프 히틀러가 옹호한 것은 미스터리가 아니다. (노르딕: 북유어럽人) 슬프게도 우생학적/ 대량학살적인 국가 사회주의자들이 뉴어럼버르그(독일 남부 도기)에서 모두 처형되지는 않았다.

사실, 히틀러에게 그 계획을 실제로 지시한 엘리트 금융가들은 단지 지하로 들어가 수십 억의 인구를 말살시키려는 그들의 사악한 계획이 성공적으로 이행될 수 있을 때까지 기꺼이 기다렸다.

 

The evidence that the Novartis-controlled "Pandemic Vaccine" may well be a tool of mass genocide, is actually quite overwhelming.

At this point, some readers may scoff and ask: "Why would any company want to kill off their customers?" The answer is that these "customers" control large blocks of assets and equity. As Kissinger's "NSSM-200" report outlines, the "spoils" of genocide include controlling large tracts of land and mineral assets. This is secondary, of course, to their warped dream of creating a Utopian World Order with only 500 million "worthy" humans allowed to share in it.

노바티스가 조종하는 “유행변 백신”이 대략 학살의 도구가 될 수 있다는 증거는 실제로 아주 압도적으로 많다.

이 시점에서, 일부 독자들은 비웃으며 질문할 것이다: “왜 어떤 회사가 그들의 고객들을 죽이기를 원하겠는가?” 이들 “고객들”이 많은 재산과 이권을 컨트롤한다는 것이 답이다. 대량학살의 “전리품”은 많은 땅과 광물 자산의 관리(통제)를 포함한다고, 키신저의 "NSSM-200" 보고서는 개요를 설명한다. 이상향을 누릴 자격이 있는 단지 5억의 인간을 가진 이상적인 세계질서를 만든다는 뒤틀린 꿈에 이것(대량 학살)이 부차적(2차적)임은 물론이다.

 

WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE?

 

While George H.W. Bush was busy saving the world from the evil dictator Saddam Hussein in 1991, pursuant to his U.N. speech to create a "new world order" an agenda for an "Initiative for Eco-92 Earth Charter" elitist meeting happened to fall into honest, Christian hands. This agenda basically reiterated the genocide outlined in Henry Kissinger's infamous NSSM-200 report of 1974, and called for "the immediate reduction of world population." The entire report can be downloaded at:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/cobden_club.htm

 

 

증거가 무엇인가?

"Initiative for Eco-92 Earth Charter"에 대한 “새세계 질서”계획(일정)을 만들기 위해 UN연설에 이어 1991년에 나쁜 독재자 사담 후세인으로부터 세계를 구하느라 조지 부시가 바쁜 동안, 엘리트주의자들 회합(소식)이 정직한 크리스챤들 손에 들어가게 되었다. 이 계획은 근본적으로 핸리 키신저의 악명 높은 1974년 NSSM-200보고서에 윤곽이 나와 있는 대량학살을 반복하는 것이었고, 세계 인구의 즉각적인 감축을 요구했다.

 

My extensive research shows that by 1992, the massive death rate of AIDS had simply not materialized to the Elite's satisfaction, and a more efficient mass killer had to be engineered in order to fulfill the edicts cut into the "Georgia Guidestones".

 

Evidence shows that like the 2009 "Novel" Flu Virus the HIV virus was also engineered and manufactured in the labs of Ft. Detrick.

내가 광범하게 조사한 바로는, 1992년까지 AIDS의 대량 치사율은 엘리트들이 만족할 정도가 되지 않아, "Georgia Guidestones”이 되게 줄이는 칙령을 완수하기 위해 보다 효과적인 대략 살해를 연구해야(만들어야) 했다.

2009년의 “잘 알려지지 않은” 독감 바이러스와 같이 HIV바이러스도 조작되어 데트릭에 있는 실험실에서 만들어졌다는 것을 증거는 보여준다.

 

In 1969, during a House Appropriations Committee hearing, the Defense Department's Biological Warfare (BW) division at Ft. Detrick requested funds to develop, through complex gene-splicing (i.e. genetic engineering) a "novel" new disease that would both be resistant to, and break down a victim's immune system. The Congressional Record reads:

1969년 의회세출위원회 청문회에서, 데트릭에 있는 국방부 生物學戰 부서는 환자의 면역체계에 저항하고 또 그것을 붕괴시킬, “잘 알려지지 않은” 새로운 질병을 복합적인 유전자 분할(즉 유전 공학)을 통해 개발할 자금을 요청했다. 의회 기록 내용은 다음과 같다:

 

"Within the next 5 to 10 years it would probably be possible to make a new infective micro-organism which could differ in certain important respects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases."

The funds for this "Dr. Strangelove" project were somehow approved. AIDS "magically" appeared within the requested time frame, and of course, just happens to exhibit the exact characteristics specified by the Ft. Detrick scientists.

 

“앞으로 5~10년 이내에, 어떤 알려진 질병 유발 유기체와 어떤 중요한 점에서 구별할 수 있는 새로운 감염성 미세조직체를 만드는 것이 아마도 가능할 것이다. 이들에게 있어서 가장 중요한 것은, 우리가 감염성 질병으로부터 상대적인 자유를 유지하기 위해 우리가 의존하는 면역학적 및 치료적 과정에서 듣지 않을지도(효과가 없을 지도) 모른다는 점이다.”

이 “스트레인지 러브 박사”프로젝트에 대한 자금은 어쨌든 승인되었다. 에이즈는 요구된 時間帶에 “요술처럼” 나타났고 데트릭 과학자들이 정한 정확한 특징을 나타내게 되었다.

 

Three years later, in 1972, the fledgling World Health Organization (WHO) published a very similar proposal to the one submitted to the U.S. House Appropriations Committee in 1969. The WHO proposed that: "An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function, e.g., by ...affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the immune cells responding to the viral antigens." (Bulletin of the W.H.O., vol. 47, p 257- 274.) This is a "textbook" clinical description of the function of the HIV/AIDS virus.

3년 후 1972년에 풋내기 WHO는 1969년에 미 의회 세출위원회에 제출된 것과 아주 유사한 제안서를 발간했다. WHO는 다음과 같이 제안했다: “바이러스가, 실제로 면역 기능 즉 B세포 기능에 반대되는 T세포 기능에 영향을 미침으로써 면역 기능에 선택적인 효과를 행사할 수 있는지 확인하기 위한 시도를 해야 한다. 만약 감염 바이러스 손상이 바이러스 抗原에 대응하는 면역 세포를 다소 선별적으로 손상시킨다면 바이러스 자체에 대한 면역적 대응이 손상될 지도 모른다는 가능성도 조사해야 한다.” 이것이 HIV/AIDS바이러스 기능의 교과서적 임상적 설명이다.

 

The W.H.O. shortly thereafter begins a massive "smallpox vaccination" program in Africa in 1975. Within two years, millions of smallpox vaccines are provided by Novartis et. al, under U.N.I.C.E.F. funding. A decade later, it is determined by independent journalists in the U.K. that the incidence of AIDS infections' MAPPED AND GRAPHED EPICENTERS in Africa coincided exactly with the locations of the W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program centers in the mid-1970's (Source, The London Times, May 11, 1987). Some 14,000 Haitians then on UN 'humanitarian missions' to Central Africa were also vaccinated in this campaign, and soon contracted HIV. Personnel actually conducting the vaccinations of the Haitians maintain they had been completely unaware that the vaccine was anything other than a routine shot.

그 직후 WHO는 1975년에 애프리커에서 대대적인 “천연두 백신접종” 계획을 시작한다. 2년 안에 수백만 개의 백신이 유니세프 자금지원하에 노바티스와 기타 제약회사에 의해 제공되었다. 10년 후, 애프리커에서 에이즈 감염 발병율의 지도화 및 그래프화된 진앙지가 1970년대 중반에 WHO 천연두 백신 계획 중심지 위치와 정확하게 일치한다는 것이, 영국에 있는 독자적인 저널리스트에 의해 결정되었다(소스 : 1987.5.11. 런던 타임즈). 당시 UN의 중앙 애프리커 ‘인도주의 미션’에서 약 14,000명의 하이티인들이 이 켐페인에서 백신을 맞았고 곧 HIV에 감염되었다. 실제로 하이티인들 접종을 실시한 인원들은, 그 백신이 정상적인 주사와 다른 것인지 전혀 몰랐다고 주장한다.

 

In 1987, Dr. Hilleman, head of all vaccine production of Merck Pharmaceuticals stunned the world with his public admissions that the mass vaccination campaigns of the 1950s and '60s likely caused thousands of cancer deaths each year. This was due to the presence of a cancer-causing virus that contaminated the first polio vaccine, according to Dr. Hilleman. Known as SV40, the virus originated from dead monkeys whose kidney cells were used to culture the first Salk vaccines. Doctors estimate that the virus was injected into tens of millions during the vaccination campaigns, including several million in Canada, before being detected and screened out in 1963. Those born between 1941 and 1961 are thought to be most at risk of having been infected with SV40, and are estimated to have a 300% greater chance of developing cancer. According to Hilleman MERCK KNEW THE VACCINES WERE INFECTED WITH SV40, but distributed them anyway. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU

 

 

1987년에 메르크 제약의 백신 생산 책임자인 힐러만 박사는, 1950년대와 1960년대의 대량 백신 켐페인이(켐페인을 시행한 결과) 매년 수천 명의 암 사망을 일으킨 것 같다고 공식적으로 인정함으로써 세계를 놀라게 했다. 이것은 처음 소아마비 백신을 오염시킨 암 유발 바이러스가 있었기 때문이었다는 것이 힐러만 박사의 말이다. SV40으로 알려진 그 바이러스는 처음 소크백신을 배양하는 데 그의 신장 세포를 이용하는 죽은 원숭이에서 기인한 것이었다.

그 바이러스는 백신 켐페인 동안 1963년에 탐지되어 가려내기 전에 캐너더에서 수백만 명을 포함하여 수천만 명에게 주사(주입)되었다고 의사들은 추산한다.  1941년과 1961년 사이에 태어난 사람들은 SV40에 감염될 위험성이 가장 높고 암으로 진전될 가능성이 300% 더 높은 것으로 추정된다. 힐러만에 의하면, 그 백신이 SV40으로 감염되었다는 것을 메르크 회사는 알았지만, 그것들(백신)을 공급했다는 것이다.

 

Furthermore, research doctors in New Orleans reported in 1963 that a percentage of the Salk polio vaccines were found to have attenuated, (live) viruses, which actually CAUSED tens of thousands of polio cases during the 1950's.

더욱이, 뉴올리언즈의 연구 의사들은, 소크소아마비 백신의 일부가 약화된 (生) 바이러스를 가진 것이 발견되었고 그것이 실제로 1950년대에 수만 명의 소아미비 환자를 발생시켰다고 1963년에 보고했다.

 

Following the successful liberation of Kuwait in Operation Desert Storm, hundreds of thousands of victorious American troops are suddenly stricken with a wide variety of auto-immune disorders that doctors named the Gulf War Syndrome, (GWS). After a decade of medical investigation, the culprit is finally determined to be an ingredient in the anthrax vaccinations mandatorily given to the troops. This offending "adjuvant" is a synthetic material known as squalene ­ aka, oil-in-water adjuvant. Writer and Gulf War correspondent Gary Matsumoto documents this entire, tragic saga in his seminal book, "Vaccine-A". See www.vaccine-a.com.

사막의 폭풍 작전으로 쿠웨이트를 성공적으로 해방시킨 후 수만 명의 의기양양한 미군들이, 의사들이 걸프전 신드로움(GWS)이라고 명명한 다양한 自家免疫 부조화로 갑자기 타격을 받았다. 10년간의 의학적인 조사가 있은 후, 그 용의자는 군인들에게 명령으로 접종한 탄저병 백신에 있는 어떤 성분 때문인 것으로 최종 결정되었다. 이 위법인 “보조약”은 스퀘일린 - 물에 있는 기름 보조약으로도 알려져 있는 - 으로 알려진 합성 물질이다. 작가이자 걸프전 통신원이었던 게리 마쓰모또는 이 비극적 이야기 전체를 그의 독창적인 책, “백신-A"에 썼다.

 

Understanding these historical facts is very important for this reason: Those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it. This is doubly true when it comes to blindly accepting a "novel" mass vaccination for a weaponized, "reverse engineered" virus.

 

The historical record is very clear ­ attenuated, live viruses in vaccines SPREAD the disease very effectively. When combined with SQUALENE ADJUVANT ­ the virus becomes many times more potent and lethal. When given to CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS, millions of "typhoid Matts and Marys" will be spreading the disease exponentially.

 

 

이런 역사적인 사실들을 이해하는 것은 이런 이유로 아주 중요하다 : 역사를 무시하는 사람들은 그것을 반복할 운명을 지닌다. 무기화한 “리버스 엔지니어링된” 바이러스에 대해 “잘 알려지지 않은” 대량 접종을 모르고 받아들이게 될 때 이 말은 두 배로 진실이 된다.

역사적 기록은 아주 분명하다 - 백신에 있는 약화된, 산 바이러스는 아주 효과적으로 그 질병을 퍼뜨린다. 스퀘일린 보조약과 결합되었을 때 그 바이러스는 몇 배 더 잠재적이고 치명적으로 된다. 학교에 있는 아이들에게 접종하면 수백만 명의 “장티부스 돌이와 순이”들이 이 질병을 급격하게 퍼뜨릴 것이다.

 

Chillingly, the Novartis patent for the "novel pandemic flu" declares that "African green monkey kidney cells" will be used for the "viral growth substrate" ­ i.e. the carrier medium.

(Page 3, paragraph 0037) We also see that "oil-in-water" squalene-based adjuvants will also be included (page 8 ­ 0098) but most incredible of all, because this is a "recombinant" and "novel" split vaccine, it is deemed necessary to include fragments of attenuated viruses (i.e. live pathogens) in the vaccine medium.

 

 

소름끼치게도, “잘 알려지지 않은 유행병 독감”에 대한 노바티스 특허는 “애프리커 그린 원숭이 신장 세포”가 “바이러스 성장 基質(효소의 작용으로 화학반응을 일으키는 물질)” - 즉 基劑에 이용될 것이라고, 선언한다. 우리는 또한, “물에 있는 기름” 스퀘일린 기제 보조약도 포함되어 있는 것을 보지만 가장 믿을 수 없는 것은, 이것이 유전자 간의 재조합형과 “잘 알려지진 않은 분할 백신이기 때문에, 그 백신 매체에 약화시킨 바이러스 조각들(즉 살아 있는 병원균들)을 포함하는 것을 피할 수 없다고 생각된다.

 

On July 13, 2009, the W.H.O. sanctioned this lunacy by declaring: "In view of the anticipated limited vaccine availability at global level and the potential need to protect against "drifted" strains of virus, it is recommended that promoting production and use of vaccines such as those that are formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines is important."

http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_vaccine_20090713/en/index.html

 

 

2009.7.13.에 WHO는 다음과 같이 선언함으로써 이런 미친 짓을 裁可했다: 세계 수준에서 예상되는 제한적인 백신 이용가능성과 “표류된” 바이러스 변종에 대해 보호할 잠재적인 필요성을 고려할 때, 오일-인 워터 보조약과 약화시킨 생 독감 백신으로 공식화된 것과 같은 백신의 생산과 이용을 촉진하는 것이 중요하다고 권고한다.

In conclusion and summation, it should be evident that the "2009 Swine Flu" could just as easily be called the "Bird Flu" ­ because it is as much H5N1 (bird flu) as H1N1 (pig flu.) Novartis knew this in 2005 when it received hundreds of millions of dollars from Mike Leavitt's HHS to develop and patent the "bird flu" vaccine. I publicly charge that Novartis had advance knowledge of this "combination" because they had been in consultation with Jeffrey Taubenberger for years.

결론과 요약으로, H1N1(돼지독감)만큼 H5N1(조류독감)이 많기 때문에,  “2009 돼지 독감”은 쉽게 “조류독감”으로 불려질 수 있다는 것이 명백해야 한다. 노바티스는, “조류독감”백신을 개발하여 특허를 내기 위해 마이크 리어빗의 HHS에서 수억 달러를 받은 2005년에 이것을 알았다. 노바티스는 수년 동안 제프리 타우벤버거와 협의해 왔기 때문에, 이런 “결합(조합)”을 미리 알고 있었다고, 나는 공개적으로 비난한다.

 

It is further evident that Novartis' patent provides for "influenza vaccine kits" to be provided to other pharmaceutical manufacturers as well. These "kits" are the basic raw ingredients needed for the other companies to build their own vaccines under their own label.

노바티스의 특허는, “독감 백신 킷”이 다른 제약회사에도 제공되도록 규정하고 있는 것은 더욱 분명하다. 이들 “킷”은 다른 회사가 자체 상표로 자체의 백신을 만들 수 있는데 필요한 기본적인 원재료 성분들이다.

 

In 2005, this "jobbing" of separate ingredients by multiple companies would never have been allowed because of the legal liability issues involved. However, in 2009, all liabilities for death and disability from faulty or contaminated vaccines have been stripped away. Any wrongful death or disability lawsuits against Novartis or any other company will today be summarily dismissed.

Novartis today has carte blanche blanket immunity for their actions ­ and any large pharmaceutical company who so desires, can join them at the feeding troughs just by paying millions for their "kits".

 

 

2005년에 다수 회사들이 분리된 요소들로 “임시 작업”을 하는 것이, 법적인 책임 문제가 개입되어 있기 때문에 허용되지 않을 것이었다. 그러나 2009년에 잘못되거나 오염된 백신으로 인한 사망과 不具에 대한 모든 책임이 없어졌다. 노바티스나 어떤 다른 회사에 대한 악의적인 사망 혹은 불구 소송은 오늘날 略式으로 기각된다.

오늘날 노바티스는 그들의 행동에 대해 백지위임된 포괄적 免責을 가지고 있고 - 그렇게 하기를 원하는 어떤 큰 제약회사도 그들 “킷”에 수백만 달러를 지불하기만 하면 먹이통에 있는 그들에게 참여할 수 있다.

 

If this isn't the pinnacle of criminality, then I don't know what is.

 

Novartis, if this "novel split vaccine" is so wonderful and safe, why do you require such blanket protection from litigation?

만약 이것이 범죄의 꼭대기가 아니라면, 무엇이 범죄의 꼭대기인지 나는 모른다.

노바티스, 만약 이 “잘 알려지지 않은 분할 백신”이 아주 경이적이고 안전하다면, 왜 당신들은 소송에서 그런 포괄적 보호가 필요한가?

As I have written, the smoking gun is found in the pages of this attached patent below.

Novartis admits that their "invented" vaccine will be effective because of ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING THE ORIGINS OF THE PANDEMIC FLU STRAIN THAT WAS "REVERSED ENGINEERED" WHICH WAS OBTAINED! Clearly the pandemic virus was not an act of nature.

This is prima facia evidence of conspiracy to commit mass murder to get gain, is it not?

*** 관련 글 :

It is Official: WHO Recommends Mandatory Injections to Almost Two Hundred Countries

WHO, 약 200개 국가에 의무적인 접종 권고

                                                         (무조건, 눈 딱 감고 놔 줘)

Wednesday, July 29, 2009 by: Barbara Minton, Natural Health Editor

(NaturalNews) Executives from Baxter, Novartis, Glaxo-Smith Kline, and Sanofi Pasteur have seats at the advisory group that on July 13th recommended mandatory H1N1 vaccination of everyone in all 194 countries that belong to the World Health Organization (WHO), according to a report just issued by journalist Jane Burgermeister.

백스터, 노바티스, 글락소-스미스 클라인, 그리고 사노피 파스퇴르의 CEO들이, WHO에 속하는 194개국 모두 모두에게 H1N1백신을 의무적으로 접종할 것을  7.13.에 권고한 자문단에서 자리를 같이 했다고, 저널리스트 제인 버거마이스터가 말했다.   

WHO spokesperson Alphaluck Bhatiasevi confirmed that Dr. Margaret Chan did not give the press briefing at WHO headquarters in Geneva as anticipated. At short notice, Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny stepped in to announce that "vaccines will be needed in all countries."

According to WHO documents, vaccines "such as those that are formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines are important." Health workers, pregnant women, healthy young adults of 15 to 49 years, and healthy children will be the targeted groups of the world wide vaccine effort.

"All countries should immunize their health-care workers as a first priority to protect the essential health infrastructure. As vaccines available initially will not be sufficient, a step-wise approach to vaccinate particular groups may be considered," according to Paule-Kieny. The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunisation established by the Director-General of the WHO in 1999, suggested the following groups for consideration, noting that countries need to determine their order of priority based on country-specific conditions: pregnant women; children over the age of 6 months with one of several chronic medical conditions; healthy young adults of 15 to 49 years of age; healthy children; healthy adults of 50 to 64 years of age; and healthy adults of 65 years of age and above.

In view of the anticipated limited vaccine availability at global levels and the potential need to protect against "drifted" strains of virus, SAGE recommended that promoting production and use of vaccines such as those that are formulated with oil-in water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines was important.

WHO Director-General Dr. Margaret Chan endorsed the above recommendations on July 11, 2009, acknowledging that they were well adapted to the current pandemic situation. She also noted that the recommendations will need to be changed if and when new evidence becomes available.

Three-stage vaccinations may create perfect cytokine storm

3단계 접종이 완전한 사이토카인 폭풍을 만들지도 모른다.

(사이토카인 폭풍 : 고양된 수준의 여러 가지 사이토카인과 함께, 사이토카인과 면역세포 사이의 적극적인 피드백 고리를 구성하는 잠재적으로 치명적인 면역반응이다. 사이토카인 폭풍의 주된 증상은 고열, 팽만과 적변(붉게 변하기), 극단적인 피로, 그리고 메스꺼움이다)  

사이토카인(cytokine)은 면역 세포가 분비하는 단백질의 총칭이다. 사이토카인은 분비된 후 다른 세포나 자신에게 영향을 줄 수 있다. 즉, 대식세포의 증식을 유도하거나 자기 자신의 분화를 촉진하기도 한다.

The vaccine is to be given by a series of three injections. Speaking on the Republic Broadcasting Network with Dr. Rebecca Carley as host on July 11th, meta-analyst and vaccine researcher Patrick Jordan reported belief that the first injection will be for the purpose of turning off the victim's immune system. The second injection will be for the purpose of loading people with deadly organisms. And the third injection will be to turn the immune system back on for the purpose of creating a cytokine storm that will deal a lethal blow to the body.

In his chronicle of the connection between vaccines and death, Jordan pointed out that in 1915 the pertussis vaccine became available and was widely given. This bacterial poison from whopping cough, called pertussis coxon, so depresses the immune system that it is used in laboratories today to turn off nutrafils and reduce white blood cell counts. Then, in 1918, soldiers who had received the pertussis vaccine were deployed to Europe, where they were given another unknown vaccine. They were then exposed to a Lucite gas, which is an arsenic compound, and phosgenegas, a chlorine compound. As a result, their immune systems kicked in with a cytokine storm that killed many of the otherwise healthy young men. This is the 1,2,3 punch Jordan is warning will come again with the "swine flu" vaccinations.

We have been conditioned to think of external microbes as our enemy during a time of influenza. But our own immune systems are potentially more lethal. When the body detects foreign microorganisms indicating an infection, it can respond by overprotecting the site of that infection. In its hurry to get antibodies to the infection site, the body may dispatch so many that the level of cytokines becomes highly elevated, creating a cytokine storm that can be fatal. For example, during a lung infection, a cytokine storm can potentially block airways and result in suffocation. (What is a Cytokine Storm, www.wisegeek.com)

Jordan continued by painting a picture outlined in the WHO Memorandum Number 1 with a study that found virus infections make antibody and antigen complexes. These complexes can clog blood vessels or implant tissue, making the body eventually attack itself. The main focus of this study was kidney disease. Animals with induced immune system deficiency were infected with lethal virus until every single cell in their bodies reflected the disease. But for a time these animals ran around like there was nothing wrong with them because their immune system was so depressed that it was making no effort to fight the disease, and there was no immune response. The WHO experimenters then took their lab animals and stimulated the cell-mediated immune response, and the animals died immediately from their bodies attacking themselves in the kind of cytokine storm associated with the 1918 Spanish flu.

Even if this described scenario does not develop, Jordan points out that the current "swine flu" vaccine is made with an adjuvant that may contain a material poison, salmonella, or typhoid fever toxin, along with squalene. Although not known with certainty, the second round of injections given to the soldiers in 1918 is believed to have contained typhus. Squalene produces auto-immunity and eventually death in everyone who takes it.

Squalene contributed to the cascade reactions known as Gulf War Syndrome that left GIs with arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, photosensitive rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuro-psychiatric problems, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and other diseases.

Retired Vax Scientist Would
Never Vaccinate His Kids

은퇴한 백신 과학자들은 그의 아이들에게 결코 접종을 하지 않을 것이다
From Ken Adachi

 8-6-9

 

"If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination."

-Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport

"만약 내게  아이가 있다면 내가 결코 하지 않을 일이 접종이다."

 

Editor's Note -- This interview was posted by Jon Rappoport in early January 2002. You will discover by reading it that the very issues we now face of FORCED vaccination of a laboratory-created vaccine to "protect" us against a laboratory-created "disease" (Swine Flu, Bird flu, etc.) was set into motion a long time ago.

 

The vaccine researcher quoted here flat out says that the World Homicide Organization, WHO, is driven by a DEPOPULATION agenda, and that many African leaders know full well that the explosive spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa was caused by WHO-sponsored vaccinations of the 1970s.

여기에 인용된 백신 연구가들은, 세계자살기구 WHO는(WHO 세계보건기구?) 인구 감축계획에 의해 움직여지고 있고, 애프리커에서의 HIV와 AIDS의 전염이 1970년대에 WHO(세계보건기구)가 후원한 접종으로 야기되었다는 것을, 많은 애프리커 지도자들은 충분히 알고 있다.

 

This former pharmaceutical insider also debunks the widespread ASSUMPTIONS of vaccine "safety" promoted by orthodox medicine, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, state health departments, and their compliant media propagandists who are all parroting SUPERSTITIONS, rather than FACTS.  --Ken Adachi

전직 제약계 내부자인 이 사람들도, 모두 진실보다는 미신을 앵무새처럼 조잘거리는 정통파 의학, CDC(질병관리본부), 국립보건연구소, 주 건강부 및 그들에 순종적인 언론 선전자들에 의해 촉진된 백신 "안전" 이라는 널리 퍼져 있는 가정의 거짓을 밝힌다. -- 켄 애더치

 ***   속말로 大盜無門라더니 ....... 

From Jon Rappoport (www.nomorefakenews.com)

 

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rappoportinterviewvaccineresearcherjan2002.shtml

 

January 2002

 

Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport: "If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination." (Aug. 6, 2009)

 

Jon Rappoport (Q) Interviews a Retired Vaccine Researcher (A) (given the pseudonym of "Dr. Mark Randall")

 

Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

 

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

 

Q: Why not?

 

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

 

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

 

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

 

Q: On what grounds?

 

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

 

Q: Harassed by whom?

 

A: The FBI.

 

Q: Really?

 

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

 

Q: So much for free speech.

 

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

 

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

 

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

 

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

 

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

 

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

 

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

 

Q: Why?

 

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

 

Q: And then?

 

A: I did my own investigation.

 

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

 

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

 

Q: What conditions?

 

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

 

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

 

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

 

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

 

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

 

Q: Why?

 

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

 

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

 

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

 

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

 

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

 

Q: Which is?

 

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

 

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

 

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

 

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

 

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

 

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

 

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

 

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

 

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

 

Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

 

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

 

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

 

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

 

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

 

Q: How were your findings received?

 

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

 

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

 

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

 

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

 

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

 

Q: The immune system is?

 

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

 

Q: So the level of general health is important.

 

A: More than important. Vital.

 

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

 

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

 

Q: And that happens?

 

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

 

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

 

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

 

Q: What was the turning point for you?

 

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

 

Q: Did you investigate?

 

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

 

Q: What do you mean?

 

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

 

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

 

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

 

Q: And that is what you found?

 

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

 

Q: Has it been enough?

 

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

 

Q: Which is?

 

A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

 

Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

 

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

 

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

 

A: Yes I did.

 

Q: What happened?

 

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

 

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

 

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

 

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

 

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

 

Q: This network you speak of.

 

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

 

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

 

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

 

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

 

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

 

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

 

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

 

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

 

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

 

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

 

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

 

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

 

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

 

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

 

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.

 

Q: A good idea.

 

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

 

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

 

A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

 

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

 

A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

 

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

 

A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

 

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

 

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

 

Q: The things that are not there.

 

A: Yes.

 

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

 

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

 

Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

 

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

 

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

 

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

 

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

 

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

 

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

 

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

 

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

 

A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

 

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

 

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

 

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

 

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

 

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

 

Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."

 

As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

 

Mark has been one of my sources.

 

He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.

 

He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.

 

Jon Rappoport

 

To learn more about Jon Rappoport and his work as a journalist, you can visit his site here: NoMoreFakeNews.com.

 

More on the Phony Swine Flu 'Pandemic' and the Issue of Forced Vaccinations

 

June 13, 2009

 

from GlobalResearch Website

 

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_influenza20.htm

 

It looks like governments around the world will either force these vaccinations on the public or launch a massive propaganda campaign to trick you into submitting to a jab.

 

If they attempt to force these untested and essentially experimental vaccinations on you, cite the Nuremberg Code, which states:

 

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential."

 

No experimental vaccine should be,

 

"conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as a subjects."

 

In addition to the "experimental physicians" submitting to their own toxins, Obama, every member of Congress, the CEOs of the drug companies, all members of WHO and the United Nations, all members of the CFR and Bilderberg, etc., should submit to a jab.

 

A third party should be on hand to make sure these folks do not get a saline injection instead of the vaccine:

 

(Agence France-Presse (AFP), June12, 2009)

Swiss drugs giant Novartis has completed a first batch of swine flu vaccine for pre-clinical trials and aims to make a version available from September, the company said.

 

"Novartis has successfully completed the production of the first batch of influenza A(H1N1) vaccine, weeks ahead of expectations," the company said. The 10-litre batch "will be used for pre-clinical eval‎uation and testing and is also being considered for use in clinical trials".

 

Novartis hopes to start clinical trials in July and "expects licensure in the fall (September to November) of 2009Åç, it said. It added that "more than 30 governments have made requests to Novartis to supply them with influenza A(H1N1) vaccine ingredients."

 

The company used cell-based technology to produce the vaccine, a faster method than the traditional technology that uses eggs, according to Novartis.

 

Read full AFP report below...

 

First swine flu vaccine ready for testing

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25627061-23109,00.html

From correspondents in Basel

Agence France-Presse

June 12, 2009

 

from News Website

 

SWISS drugs giant Novartis has completed a first batch of swine flu vaccine for pre-clinical trials and aims to make a version available from September, the company said.

 

"Novartis has successfully completed the production of the first batch of influenza A(H1N1) vaccine, weeks ahead of expectations," the company said.

 

The 10-litre batch,

 

"will be used for pre-clinical eval‎uation and testing and is also being considered for use in clinical trials".

 

Novartis hopes to start clinical trials in July and,

 

"expects licensure in the fall (September to November) of 2009", it said.

 

It added that,

 

"more than 30 governments have made requests to Novartis to supply them with influenza A(H1N1) vaccine ingredients."

 

The company used cell-based technology to produce the vaccine, a faster method than the traditional technology that uses eggs, according to Novartis.

 

Novartis received $US289 million ($352.96 million) last month from the US Department of Health and Human Services for the development of the vaccine. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared a swine flu pandemic today, ratcheting up its alert to the maximum level of six.

 

WHO declares official swine flu pandemic

 

Swine flu has infected almost 30,000 people in 75 countries and claimed 144 lives since it was first detected in Mexico in April.

 

Return to Influenza - Virus H1N1 - Unintentional Contamination or Bioterrorism?

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_influenza.htm#contents

 

Return to Industry "Weapons" for Earth's Depopulation

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_

industryweapons.htm#Additional_Information

 

Return to Killer Vaccines - Vacunas Que Matan (in Spanish)

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_vacunas.htm#contents

자유게시판 관련 글 : 2722, 2723, 2725, 2774, 2777번 글

[구산동]

글 감사합니다,, 전세계를 대상으로한 생물한 전쟁, 테러군요

[나리]

돟은 정보 감사히 잘 밨습니다