|
유전자변형 인간 : 뭐가 잘못되었나?
Genetically Modified People: What could go Wrong?
By Jon Rappaport
Notes on Brave New World, against which freedom is the prime option
Freedom to refuse
February 21, 2017
나는 유전자 조작된 사람들의 이야기를 할 것이다; 그러나 우선, 거대한 유전자 사기행각과 선전 활동의 배경을 가진 자들이 먼저다.
- 암과의 전쟁은 유전적인 해결책이 있을 것이란 희망의 그림으로 그려졌다. 이것은 모든 종류의 인간 암에 대해서 전반적인 유전적 치료가 없다는 사실에도 불구하고 말이다.
인간 유전자에 중점을 두자는 소리는 산업 환경에서 화학 물질, 오염 물질, 살충제, 식품 첨가제, 심지어 의약품까지도 암의 명백한 원인 가능성임을 회피하려는 이야기이다.
I'll get to genetically modified people; but first, the background on the grand gene hype and propaganda operation-
The war against cancer has painted a picture of hope: genetic solutions.
This, despite the fact that there are no successful genetic treatments, across the board, for any form of human cancer.
The focus on genes is a diversion from obvious causes of cancer in the environment: industrial chemicals, pollutants, pesticides, food additives, and even pharmaceuticals.
이 쓸데없는 인간의 유전자변형 치료행위는 식량 작물에도 직접 적용된다 :
독성 농약으로 흠뻑 절어도 식물이 자랄 수 있다고 내용을 수정하려는 것이다. 그러나 거대한 GMO 작물의 실패, 작물의 영양가치 감소, 초강력 잡초 번성실태는 유전자 모델이 실패하는 3 가지 이유이다. 그래서 그것은 인간의 암과 관련이 있다 : "사람들의 유전자를 수정하라. 그러면 암을 유발하는 화학 물질의 환경적 공격에 영향을 받지 않을 것이라는 소리를 하고있다.
This futile human gene-fix has a direct parallel in food crops: modify plants so they can grow despite drenching them with toxic pesticides.
However, massive GMO crop failures, reduced nutritive value of such crops, and the rise of super-weeds are three reasons why the gene model fails.
So it is with human cancer: "let's modify the genes of people and they will be impervious to the environmental assault of chemicals that cause cancer."
다른 말로 하면 언젠가 인간은 거대 기업이 만든 유독한 수프 속에서도 살 수있다는 얘기인데, 그이유는 인간이 유전적으로 변형되어 있기 때문에 생존하고 번성할 수 있다고 제안한다. 허나 이 소리를 믿을만한 이유가 없다. 이야기는 더나간다 ;
"우리를 믿어라. 환경 독소가 암을 유발하는 유전자 돌연변이를 촉발시킨다 하더라도, 우리는 더 나은 인간 유전공학을 통해 그러한 돌연변이를 없앨 수있다." 라고 말한다. 정말 터무니 없는 소리다.
이것은 사람들의 면역 체계가 심각하게 또 만성적으로 훼손되어도 세균으로 인한 질병을 치료할 수 있다고 말하는 것과 같다.
In other words, the fantasy proposes that someday, humans will be able to live in a toxic soup created by mega-corporations, and even thrive, because they have been genetically altered.
There is no reason under the sun to believe this.
"Trust us. Even if environmental toxins trigger gene mutations that bring about cancer, we can just cancel out those mutations through better human engineering."
Preposterous.
This is like saying you can cure diseases caused by germs even though people's immune systems are severely and chronically compromised.
전체 암 산업은 암을 유발하는 제품을 생산하는 기업을 보호하기 위해 존재한다.
나는 라디오 인터뷰에서 이 점을 분명히 지적했고, 또 주요 언론매체가 침묵을 지키기 때문에 다시 말해야했다. 그 언론들은 암 산업의 일부이며 거대한 광고 수요를 일으키면서, 암을 유발하는 기업에 관심이 있다.
소위 연구 공동체에서 과학자들은 계속 바람을 일으키면서 유전자와 생쥐 및 세포주 (*)에 대한 실험 행위를 영구히 하고있고, 또 생명을 구할 수있는 결과를 제시하면서, 나오지 않는 보조금을 얻을 수 있었다. (*) (참고 : 그런데, '세포주'에 대한 거대하고 일반적인 스캔들이 있다는 것을 알고 있나요?)
이 과학자들과 그들의 회사 주인들은 작은 종양 감소를 예고할 수 있다. 그러나 아무것도 바뀌지 않는다. 암과의 전쟁은 사람들과의 전쟁이다.
The entire cancer industry exists to protect the corporations that are manufacturing products that cause cancer.
I've made these points during radio interviews, and I make them here again, because major media news outlets are silent; they are part of the cancer industry and are beholden to the cancer-causing corporations that buy huge blocks of advertising.
In the so-called research community, scientists can spin their wheels and obtain grant monies to do experiments with genes and mice and ‘cell lines' (*) forever and never emerge with results that will save lives. (*) (Note: by the way, did you know there is a huge, general scandal with ‘cell lines'? More on that here.)
These scientists and their corporate masters can herald minor tumor reductions. But nothing changes. The war on cancer is a war on people.
유전자 손상이 암을 유발할 수 있다고 가정하면, 그런 상태에서 환경 독소와 접촉한 것이 암을 촉발시켰다고 볼 수 있다. 즉 유전자 자체의 구성과 배열에 대한 연구를 아무리 많이 해도 유전자 독성의 영향은 계속될 것이다.
많은 암 연구가 사실 유독한 원인을 발견하는데 있다. 그리고 그 화합물을 전세계에 퍼날러서 형사적 죄를 은폐하는 것에서 그 회사의 이익이 나온다.
따라서 "암은 모든 유전자에있다"고 주장하는 것보다 그 화합물을 적발하는 일이 더 좋은 방법" 임은 물론이다.
몬산토, 바이엘, 듀퐁, 신젠타와 같은 거대 생명공학 회사를 살펴보시라. 어떤 면에서든 그들은 화학 및 유전 연구와 생산에 관여하고 있다. 따라서 그들은 "유전자 연구의 최전선"을 추진함으로써 그들이 겪고있는 화학으로 인한 손해와 파괴를 막을 수있는 주요 위치에있다.
허나 "유전자에 관한 모든 것" 은, 거짓 속임수이며, 속임수이며, 속임수이다.
Assuming gene damage can cause cancer, the triggering event can occur as a result of coming into contact with environmental toxins. In other words, the toxic effects on genes will continue apace, no matter how much research is done on the composition and disposition of the genes themselves.
Much cancer research does, in fact, discover toxic causes-and it is in the interest of companies that spew those compounds out into the world to cover up their criminal guilt. What better way to achieve that than by asserting: "cancer is all in the genes."
Look at the giant biotech companies like Monsanto, Bayer, DuPont, Syngenta. In one way or another, they are all involved in chemical AND genetic research and production.
So they are in a prime position to deflect the chemical destruction they are wreaking by pushing "the frontiers of gene research."
"It's all about the genes."
Hype. Hype. Hype.
환경독소 연구에 자신의 삶의 대부분을 바친 엡스타인 Samuel Epstein 박사는 다음과 같이 적었다. "우리는 암과의 전쟁에서 지고있다. 새로운 발암성 제품의 금지, 사용중인 독소의 감소, 그리고 알 권리에 관한 법 - 이것이 암발병 전염병을 역전시킬 수있는 입법안에 들어가야한다."
그러나 그것은 그들의 사업에 좋지 않을 것이다. 해결책?
유전자와 유전자 만이 암의 근원이라는 개념을 끊임없이 홍보하시라. 큰 그림? 큰 죄수?
모든 종류의 오염으로 세상이 물에 빠져 있다고 상상해보십시오. 과학자들은 "걱정하지 마십시오" 라고 말한다. 이런 쳇바퀴도는 기만의 소리에는 답이 없다.
Dr. Samuel Epstein, who devoted a major part of his life to the research of environmental toxins, wrote:
"We are losing the war against cancer. The prohibition of new carcinogenic products, reduction of toxins in use, and right-to-know laws - these are among the legislative proposals which could reverse the cancer epidemic."
But that would be bad for business. The solution? Promote endlessly the notion that genes and only genes are at the root of cancer.
The big picture? The big con? Imagine a world drowning in pollution of all kinds, and top (bought-off) scientists saying: "Don't worry, when it comes to cancer we've got it covered.
Tweak this gene, tweak that gene, and poof, cancer never has a chance. Or if you get cancer, we can go in there and re-position crucial genes and knock out the disease. See, you can live in a chemical soup and never feel adverse effects..."
Genes. High-level, high-flying, high-minded, high-tech answers for the problems we face.
What? The science isn't solid? The propaganda is wall-to-wall? The shills are everywhere? Don't worry, be happy. The best minds will come up with solutions. Just wait and see. The great discoveries are right around the corner.
And I have condos for sale on Jupiter.
Step right up.
You can see the same kind of gene-hustle when it comes to autism, which many researchers, based on no real evidence, claim is "surely a genetic disease."
This assertion covers up the fact that happy and healthy children, soon after receiving a vaccination, experience devastating neurological damage, leading to a diagnosis of autism.
But don't go there, don't look there, don't talk about vaccines. No, instead, listen to the ascendant experts, who say it was just a coincidence that a vaccine was given and a child's life was destroyed. You see, what really happened was: an errant gene response kicked in at the same moment as the shot of vaccine. A grand coincidence. Nothing to do with the vaccine. Certainly not.
사실상 이 세계의 권력자들의 지배적인 패러다임은 다음과 같다 : 커다란 커버 스토리를 팔아라.
그것을 띄우고 국민들에게 계속 돌려대며 판매하라. 진행중인 범죄를 은폐하기 위해 그것들을 사용하라.
"그것은 유전자이다"라는 소리는 최신의 가장 거대한 은폐행위이다.
In actuality, the dominant paradigm of this world's power structure is: float cover stories.
Sell big cover stories and keep selling them. Use them to conceal ongoing crimes.
"It's the genes" is the latest and greatest cover.
행성에서 가장 거대하게 교육을 잘받은 거짓말쟁이 중 일부는 매일 유전자 타령을 배포한다.
다음으로 중요한 것은 그들이 백신으로 주입하는 유전자들이다. 그 거짓말이 최고로 돌아간다. 물론, 과학자들은 주입된 유전자가 몸에 스스로를 통합하고 인간의 유전자 메이크업을 영구적으로 바꿀 것이라는 사실을 인정한다.
유전자가 바뀌면 어떻게 되느냐고?
그간의 면역보다 더 강한 면역이 되지 않느냐고?
인간이 새로운 변종으로 진화되는게 아니냐고?
자 간단히 생각해보자. 인간이 옥수수 유전자를 변형시켜서 크기도 크고 잘생긴 목수수가 나와서 그걸 먹으면 어땠는가를? 소화는 잘되던가? 더 힘이 나던가? 무언가 이상하지 않았던가...
인간의 유전자도 마찬가지이다. 그걸 바꿔서 병에대한 또 암에대한 저항력이 생겼다고 하자. 그다음에 어떤 문제가 기다릴 것인가? 그것은 불확실하고 불안정하고, 자기 파멸적인 엉뚱한 결과가 기다릴수있다. 그것이 꼭 궁금하고 끌린다면 유전자 변형 백신을 맞으시라. 허나 그것을 해보지 않아도 문제를 안다면, 절대 유전자 백신을 맞아서는 안되는 것이다. 거대 기업의 몰못트가 되서 평생 병원신세를 지면서 살지않으려면 말이다..
Some of the biggest, best-educated liars on the planet deploy it every day.
Here is the next big thing: genes injected, functioning as vaccines. The hype is over the top. Of course, scientists admit that these injected genes will incorporate themselves in the body and alter its genetic makeup permanently.
If you like and trust that idea, I have condos in the core of the sun for sale. Bargain prices.
The reference is the New York Times, 3/9/15, "Protection Without a Vaccine." It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to "protect against disease," while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
"By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease."
"'The sky's the limit,' said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study."
"The first human trial based on this strategy - called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. - is underway, and several new ones are planned."
"I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle."
Here is the punchline: "The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient's own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies."
Read that again: "the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient's own DNA." Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Not just a "visit." "Permanent residence.
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
"Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease."
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
Let's take this further. Under the cover of preventing disease (note: all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.
The enormous tonnage of propaganda about vaccines, and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination (without fear of liability), create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible.
Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species.
This grand experiment could be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 will be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 will be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.
Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results. on various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies' responses to the genetic alterations.
Are these people stronger or weaker? Do they exhibit signs of illness? Do they report behavioral changes? Through surveillance and testing, all sorts of information can be compiled.
Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.
And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary. on a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. on the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans. Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the "chosen few." And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce "better soldiers" is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA.
A global vaccine experiment of the type I'm describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which "have nothing to do with vaccines." This is already SOP (standard operating procedure) for the medical cartel.
The numbers of casualties, in this grand experiment, would be of no concern to the Brave New World shapers. As I've documented extensively, the US medical system is already killing 2.25 million people per decade (a conservative estimate), as a result of FDA-approved drugs and mistreatment in hospitals. Major media and government leaders, aware of this fact, have done nothing about it.
Here is a quote from Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, the author of Remaking Eden. It gives you a window into how important geneticists are thinking about an engineered future:
"The GenRich-who account for ten percent of the American population-[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class...
"Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.
"Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.
"Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme."
Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:
"Even if half the world's species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms-some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two-burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future."
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/21/genetically-modified-people-what-could-go-wrong/