★영어번역부탁드려요 ㅠ.ㅠ 완전급해요!!!!!!★

J Dent Res 88(3) 2009 Fluoride in Compomers and Future Caries 279 amalgam in this respect when amalgam is placed with a fluoride-releasing bonding agent. Considering the results presented here, together with our previously published results on new restoration placement and replacement of existing restorations (Soncini et al., 2007), our study suggests that placement of compomer restorations in a high-risk population results in more future dental needs compared with amalgam. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study was supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, MD, USA (U01 DE11886), which also participated in the design and conduct of the study. Trial Registration: Health Effects of Dental Amalgams in Children, NCT00065988, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/ NCT00065988?order=1 REFERENCES American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2005). Guideline on periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance, and oral treatment for children. Pediatr Dent 27(7 Suppl):84S-86S. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2002). Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 60:93-97. Attar N, Onen A (2002). Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:289-296. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. (2006). Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 295:1775-1783. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM (2002). Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24:465-479. Burke FM, Ray NJ, McConnell RJ (2006). Fluoride-containing restorative materials. Int Dent J 56:33-43. The Children’s Amalgam Trial Study Group (2003). The Children’s Amalgam Trial: design and methods. Control Clin Trials 24:795-814. Chung CK, Millett DT, Creanor SL, Gilmour WH, Foye RH (1998). Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. J Dent 26:533-538. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984). Analysis of survival data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A (1998). Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Oper Dent 23:81-86. Donly KJ, Grandgenett C (1998). Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 11:245-248. Eichmiller FC, Marjenhoff WA (1998). Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials. Oper Dent 23:218-228. Estafan D, Agosta C (2003). Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system. Gen Dent 51:506-509. Gonzalez Ede H, Yap AU, Hsu SC (2004). Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 29:578-585. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ (1998). A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent 26:259-265. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Milano M, Flaitz C (2000). Compomer materials and secondary caries formation. Am J Dent 13:231-234. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y (2000). Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 25:20-25. Marczuk-Kolada G, Jakoniuk P, Mystkowska J, Luczaj-Cepowicz E, Waszkiel D, Dabrowski JR, et al. (2006). Fluoride release and antibacterial activity of selected dental materials. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (online) 60:416-420. Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC (1999). Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months e-valuation. Caries Res 33:387-392. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C (2007). The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc 138:763-772. Torii Y, Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Inoue K (2001). Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 26:36-43. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T (2006). Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—luoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 23:343-362. Yaman SD, Er O, Yetmez M, Karabay GA (2004). In vitro inhibition of caries-like lesions with fluoride-releasing materials. J Oral Sci 46: 45-50. Ylp HK, Smales RJ (1999). Fluoride release and uptake by aged resinmodified glass ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite. Int Dent J 49:217-225.   Figure. Rates of new caries after restoration placement, by treatment group, in the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial (N = 2039 restorations). (a) Rate of new caries on a different surface of the same tooth. P = 0.98, calculated from a random-effects accelerated-failure time model with proportional hazards, adjusted for gender, socio-economic status, and number of decayed and filled surfaces in the mouth. (b) Rate of new caries on a different tooth. P = 0.007, calculated from a random-effects acceleratedfailure time model with proportional hazards, adjusted for age.   빠른 번역 부탁드릴게요 ㅠ.ㅠ