Food and the Walmartization of Agriculture

[논둑길맨발로]

Food and the Walmartization of Agriculture

By Josh Sager

Global Research, July 02, 2013

theprogressivecynic.com

Region: USA

Theme: Biotechnology and GMO, Global Economy

Walmart has become an icon of the corporate rush to keep costs low and profits high, regardless of the effects on society.

They sell cheaply made goods—often produced in deplorable conditions—for low prices and keep overhead costs low by refusing to pay their workers a livable wage. It is this business strategy that catapulted them to be among the largest corporate interests in the world and allowed them to spread into virtually every corner of the United States.

Currently, approximately 25% of the American grocery market is controlled by Walmart, making it the largest single grocery distributor in the United States. In some areas—including many rural and low-income urban locales—this control is far larger than 25%, as the low prices of Walmart have crowded out competition and created a local monopoly. As Walmart is so much larger than its competitors (ex. farmer’s markets), it is able to undercut the prices of their competition and squeeze them out of business.

Walmart shops in the USA

The business model and sheer size of Walmart have caused their corporate practices to have huge impact on the global agricultural markets—they are so large that their choices lead to ripples in global agriculture markets.

The corporate decisions of Walmart have affected virtually every aspect of agriculture, including the growing practices of the producers, the conduct of other sellers, and the consumers of goods.

Food Sellers

The Walmartization of food sale has promoted the sale of cheap, processed, foods over that of the more expensive fresh produce and unprocessed foods. In addition to this, the massive need for cheap agricultural products has led to an increase in the preval‎ence of industrial “mono-crop” farms.

It is far easier and less expensive for food sellers to stock junk food and highly-processed, long-lasting foods than it is for them to stock fresh produce. Unlike produce, chips, pre-prepared meals, and many other processed foods do not spoil and require minimal labor to manage in a store—there is less of a need to have people spend time checking the freshness of the goods and less waste due to spoilage. To see this effect in action, you can simply go down to your local 7/11, Store 24, or Tedeschi’s and compare the preval‎ence of fresh products to non-perishable processed products.

When looking at this situation, it is important to note that healthy foods may be more expensive to sell, but they are ultimately, less expensive to the consumer. The leading cause of debt in the United States is medical care, and many of the severe long-term medical issues that we face can be addressed with a good diet. People who eat large amounts of processed, high calorie food suffer from increased health risks and are more likely to develop issues of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity-related disorders than those who eat a more healthy diet. In this case, junk food is cheaper to buy, but you may pay for in health consequences and medical bills later.

In many poorer areas of the country, “food deserts” have formed and people simply lack access to a supplier who sells healthy foods. A food desert is simply an area where poverty has driven out sellers of fresh, organic, and un-processed foods, leading to a situation where the only available foods are cheap, processed, pre-packaged, and unhealthy foods.

Walmart is large enough that these food deserts are a great place to set up shop (they can crowd out the already weak competition), and the company has already made attempts to move into existing food deserts. According to a recent study by the City of Manhattan, this encroachment into food deserts by Walmart will result in the destruction of most local food businesses (including those few which sell healthy food), and will not have any appreciable positive effect. Within a few years, the only “fresh” produce available in these places will come from the Walmart that took over the area’s grocery market.

Food Supply

If Walmart were to supply healthy, fresh and clean produce, their encroachment and takeover of food deserts would be a purely economic problem, but this is not the case. In recent years, Walmart has attempted to brand itself as a reliable supplier of not only snack food, but fresh produce. Unfortunately for them, this attempt has been marred by numerous situations that demonstrate that Walmart’s “fresh” produce is often of low quality and not really fresh. In fact, Walmart has a very bad history in regard to produce freshness and GMO labeling.

As reported by the news agency RT.com, Walmart is now selling Monsanto GMO produce, without warning labels, in their produce departments. Of particular note, Walmarts across the country are now selling Monsanto’s GMO corn on their shelves, while giving the consumer no warning whatsoever.

While Walmart claims to sell locally-sourced, organic foods, several scandals have questioned this claim. In a recent scandal in China, Walmarts were shut down for fraudulently selling port that was not organic, under the label that is was organic. Regardless of whether or not Walmart “organic” food is actually organic, Walmart gets most of its “organic” produce from suppliers in China and industrial farms—this means that regardless of which “organic food” a consumer may buy from Walmart, it is not likely to have come from a small, local farm.

Food Producers

The massive demand for food by our planet’s population and the proliferation of processed foods in the Walmartization of agriculture, has led to an increase in industrial mono-crop farming, particularly in regard to corn. Small farms are simply unable to produce the volume of produce that is sold by Walmart, so it is larger industrial farms which get Walmart’s business. Monocrop farming may claim to be more efficient at growing food, but this is simply not borne out by the evidence; such farms are not sustainable and often utilize extremely powerful pesticides in order to control pests.

The industrial mono-crop farming of corn is a very important part of this situation, as much of the world sweet-corn farming is used in the creation of high fructose corn syrup for processed foods. Virtually every processed food contains some amount of high fructose corn syrup, thus huge amounts of corn need to be grown. To make matters worse, American corn that is intended for high fructose corn syrup is commonly made out of GMO corn—oftentimes Monsanto “Roundup Ready” corn.

Conclusion

In totality, the proliferation of Walmart as a primary grocery source and the Walmartization of the American food supply is undeniably a consequential phenomenon. Some claim that this will result in cheaper food for the poor, but many others are worried that food will decrease in quality and this will eventually lead to serious health consequences.

In our current hard economic times, an increasing number of people are forced to turn to Walmart as a source of cheap food (or are forced to as smaller stores go under). Because of this, the business practices of Walmart are very relevant to the health of the food supply of the United States. We must ask ourselves, do we want to create a situation where agriculture and food supplies conform to the cheap, low-quality products business model of Walmart?

Articles by: Josh Sager

Related content:

1. 

   Corporate Wealth versus People’s Health: “Food Safety” Used to Increase Corporate Control over Food and Agriculture

   GRAIN media release | 5 May 2011
   Briefing: Food safety for whom?A new briefing by GRAIN looks at how “food safety” is being used as a tool to increase corporate control over food and agriculture and what people are doing…

2. 

   “Nobel of Agriculture”, World Food Prize. And the Winner is … Monsanto

   Though not nearly as high profile, the annual World Food Prize award is often referred to as the “Nobel Prize” for agriculture, and this year’s winners – scientists with key roles in developing genetically engineered crops – may bring unwanted…

3. 

   The Impacts of Biotechnology on Agriculture and the Food Chain: Evidence of Worldwide GMO Contamination

   “UK’s push for GM crops looks ill considered and irresponsible”. Megan Noble and Lawrence Woodward
   Does Owen Paterson – described as the biotech companies’ latest PR man – know about the recent experience of GM contamination in Oregon, Switzerland, Western…

4. 

   Food Sovereignty: Sustainable Urban Agriculture in Cuba

   Sinan Koont, Sustainable Urban Agriculture in Cuba (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 2011), 208 pages, $74.95, hardback.
   The agricultural revolution in Cuba has ignited the imaginations of people all over the world. Cuba’s model serves as a foundation for…

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-walmartization-of-agriculture/5336449

The WalMart-ization of Local Agriculture

WalMart – There, I said it.  I find when speaking with generally anybody, for each person there is an opinion about the low cost retailer.  Aside from personal opinions, WalMart excels at what it does- Existing as the low cost leader.  So when the business pledged in 2010 to double its local produce sales from 4 to 9 percent by 2015 in order to support local foods and farming, I wondered, “Who wasn’t skeptical that this would end well?”

So here we are in 2013 and the chain has announced that they have already exceeded their 9% objective- It says 11 percent of its produce comes from local farms.  They delivered on their sustainability pledge.  On the other hand, the WalMart-ization of local agriculture may change the landscape.

The big retailer has exceeded its sustainability pledge but now research is questioning ‘who is benefiting?’.  NPR’s recent article, “Small Farmers Aren’t Cashing In With Wal-Mart”, confirm‎s 2010 skeptics’ concerns that local agriculture’s tide can only go down by doing business with WalMart.  In other words, in order to accommodate WalMart’s low cost mission, farms doing business with the retailer must choose to operate more like factory farms or suffer standard of living hardships – Some may argue both.  This is nothing new.  The retailer’s low price hardball influence has moved domestic businesses (and jobs!) overseas resulting in up to $25 billion in cheaper Chinese imports hitting their merchandising floors.  This is what they do.  They commoditize industries and remove value.  In local agriculture this means displacing nature and farmers with mass marketing’s best practices.  So as WalMart continues to commoditize land and crops, and claim achievement on its Sustainability Report, not everybody benefits.  So let’s not complain, we’re most likely preaching to the choir.  Vote with your dollars and buy locally grown foods when possible.

http://twoguysinvermont.com/2013/02/the-walmart-ization-of-local-agriculture/