(정동희 16) 호주 고위공무원 뇌물부패가 낳은 악몽 속의 1년 : 최소한의 양심에 기반한 기적은 나타날까? 호주의 최초 역사가 영국

[정동희]

(정동희 16) 호주 고위공무원 뇌물부패가 낳은 악몽 속의 1년 : 최소한의 양심에 기반한 기적은 나타날까?

호주의 최초 역사가 영국 죄수의 유배지라는 사실은 역사책에나 있는 오래된 기록일 거라고만 생각했다.
이제 시대는 2024년을 지나 2025년이고, 호주 1인당 GDP는 68000달러로 세계 11위이다. 룩셈부르크 등 작은 나라들을 제외하면 큰 국가들 중에서는 사실상 미국 다음으로 잘 사는 나라가 호주이다.
이런 부자나라에서 2024년 연초부터 호주 정부가 출자한 은행장에게 나는 인출과정에서 지속적으로 괴롭힘과 억지에 시달리다가 결국에는 호주 출자은행장의 뇌물 요구들이 이어지며, 나는 '호주 사람들 속의 피에는 아직도 죄수의 피가 흐르나?'하고 깜짝 놀랐다. '설마 그러겠나 이렇게 잘 사는 나라인데'하고 나는 당시 다시 마음을 고쳐먹었다.
그런데 그게 아니었다.
2024년 11월부터는 호주 법무장관과 (개인을 전혀 상대하지 않고 정부기관과 금융기관만 상대하는) The banking supervision bureau가 짜고치는 (국제법에 반하는) 공권력 만행이 한 번도 아니고 무려 3번 연속적으로 '호주 고위공무원 뇌물부패 비리를 최초로 신고하고 관련 민사소송에 승소한 원고인 나에게 가해지며 악몽과 같은 현실 고통이 1년 이상 지속되고 있다.
 호주 고위공무원의 부패는 여전히 현재진행형이고 미래에도 그럴 것이다. The Auz's fundamental maze of bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials is '음주운전식 공권력 만행'이기 때문이다.
술독이 아니라 호주 정부의 과도한 '돈독'이 핵심이다.
그리고 더 근본적인 호주 고위공무원들의 심리는 과거 자신의 조상들이 호주 원주민을 강탈하듯이, '아시아인을 (공존의 대상 파트너가 아니라) 돈독에 의하여 강탈하는 대상으로 보고 있다'는 의구심만이 들 뿐이다.
호주 고위공무원  대규모 뇌물부패가 낳은 악몽 속에서 지난 1년을 보내며 급기야 거지가 된 나에게, 최소한의 양심에 기반한 기적은 나타날 수 있을까? 기도할 뿐이다.
'The fundamental structure of the maze of bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials in Australia.'를 이제 나의 실제사례를 통하여 살펴보자.

A year in the nightmare caused by bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials in Australia: Will a miracle based on a minimum of conscience appear?

The fundamental structure of the maze of bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials in Australia is · ·

I thought the fact that Australia's first history was as a place of exile for British convicts was an old record found only in history books.

The year is now 2025, past 2024, and Australia's per capita GDP is $68,000, ranking 11th in the world. Excluding small countries such as Luxembourg, Australia is actually the second most prosperous country among large countries after the United States.

In such a rich country, from the beginning of 2024, I was continuously harassed and coerced by the head of a bank invested by the Australian government during the withdrawal process. Eventually, the head of the Australian-funded bank continued to demand bribes. I was surprised and asked, 'Does the blood of prisoners still flow in the blood of Australian people?'

At that time, I changed my mind and thought, ‘How can that be? It’s such a prosperous country.’

But that wasn't it.

From November 2024, the atrocities of public power (against international law) orchestrated by the Australian Attorney General and the banking supervision bureau (which does not deal with individuals at all, but only with government agencies and financial institutions) have been inflicted not once, but three times in a row on me, the plaintiff who first reported the bribery and corruption corruption of high-ranking Australian government officials and won the related civil suit, and the nightmare-like reality has continued for more than a year.

Corruption among high-ranking public officials in Australia is still ongoing and will continue to be so in the future. This is because The Auz's fundamental maze of bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials is 'drunken driving-like public power brutality.'

The key is not alcoholism, but the Australian government's excessive 'mongering'.

And, more fundamentally, there is only the suspicion that the psychology of high-ranking Australian government officials is that, just as their ancestors robbed the Australian natives in the past, 'Asians are viewed as objects to be robbed by wealth (rather than as partners for coexistence).'

For me, who has spent the past year living in a nightmare caused by large-scale bribery and corruption among high-ranking Australian government officials and ended up becoming a beggar, can a miracle based on a minimum of conscience appear? I just pray.

Let's now look at 'The fundamental structure of the maze of bribery and corruption among high-ranking public officials in Australia.' through my actual case.

The Auz government is committing 'a serious crime of large-scale bribery and corruption and protecting the criminal assets of high-ranking public officials.'

As a result, the Australian government is committing 'a serious crime of large-scale bribery and corruption and protecting the assets of high-ranking public officials.'

In February 2024, I was the first to report the bribery corruption case of the president of a bank invested by the Australian government and won the related civil trial in June 2024.

Since I am a foreigner, I had the Australian government deposit 1/10th of the winning amount, and when it was completed in early November 2024, I asked The Banking Supervision Bureau, etc. for the costs related to the procedure for concluding the trial in my favor. So, I received a clear answer from them and paid as follows.

① The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$23,600 for handling the case (Payable on November 22, 2024)

② The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$25,860 for closing the case (Payable on November 22, 2024)

③ US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau (Payable on November 22, 2024)

However, as the Australian government took measures to require me, the plaintiff, to pay for the exchange rate difference between the bank president, a high-ranking government official in the country who was a suspect in a bribery and corruption case, I tried to raise the money for a month and paid it as follows.

④ The trial plaintiff paid the trial defendant the exchange rate difference of 258,633 USD. (Paid at 24th Dec 2024)

⑤ The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$12,800 for an execution fee (Payable on December 24, 2024)

However, this time, the Australian government illegally linked Double Jeopardy, which is against international law, to this completely different trial and again demanded money from me, the plaintiff in the winning trial, so I went to the Attorney General of Western Australia (through my agent) and asked if this was the final cost.

Then, Western Australia's Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley, added two additional fees as a red flag and promised in a government document on January 6, 2025 that 'This is absolutely final fees'.

So, I risked my life to get money and paid it as follows. At this time, the Attorney General of Western Australia committed an 'act against humanity' by demanding one more cost in addition to these three costs, but I paid the fee as follows.

⑥ the freezing procedure fee of US$ 189,823 of the Banking Supervision Bureau (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑦ the General Administration of Finance remitted US$ 38,960 to Stamp charge (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑧ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 12,800 US dollars for an execution fee, again (paid on 17 January 2025)

⑨ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 5,780 US dollars for a certificate fee (paid on 17 January 2025)

However, just a few days after receiving the money, Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley and the banking supervision bureaus did not keep their promise in the previous document, double billed me for the remittance fee I had already paid in November 24 by exaggerating a large amount, and suddenly threatened like a gangster that if I did not pay by the deadline, a large late fee would be incurred and all my rights would be revoked as of February 20, 2024.

Even though the trial plaintiff was the winner, he was the weak one in front of the power brutality of the Australian Ministry of Justice, so he had no choice but to pay the money as follows on February 20, 2024.

⑩ pay the late payment fee of 108,570 dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑪ pay an extension fee of 53,800 US dollars ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

⑫ US$ 62,630 has been included in the reduction of handling fee ( paid on 20 Feb 2025)

The problem is that, as a beggar with no money at all, I begged the Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley yesterday that I would only receive compensation equivalent to the 62,630 USD remittance fee I paid last week and give up the rest, but he only repeated that he would deprive me of all my rights (without even 0.1% of reflection on the brutality and mistakes of his public power).

If that happens, the result will be a double crime in which the Australian government protects the astronomical criminal assets of the bank president's bribery corruption case funded by the Australian government in February 2024.

Moreover, I am a contributor to the transfer of 18m USD, a portion of these criminal funds, to the Australian treasury. The Australian government makes that money, eats up all the huge fees I have paid, and furthermore, becomes a state criminal like the following.

As a result, the Australian government is committing 'a serious crime of large-scale bribery and corruption and protecting the assets of high-ranking public officials.'

Last Wednesday, my local agent visited and consulted with the General Administration of Financial Anti-Corruption Bureau before making the bet. After receiving the reply that compensation could be forced if I did not pay it, I reported the details again last Thursday.

Yesterday afternoon, a summons was issued by the General Administration of Financial Anti-Corruption Bureau to the charges of the Attorney General and the Banking Supervision Bureau in this regard.  The Anti-Corruption Bureau told me that the charges of the Ministry of Justice and the Banking Supervision Bureau were implemented in accordance with the Financial Management Regulations Law, and there was no additional charge. At the same time, it also told that if all the fees were paid and no compensation was received within the prescribed time, the Anti-Corruption Bureau would take financial anti-corruption measures.

However, the problem is that I, a good-intentioned trial winner and trial plaintiff, was trampled by the boots of Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley, and The Banking Supervision Bureau in succession, and went bankrupt.

It talks about the atrocities of the Australian government, which is a national criminal.

The Goliath Australian government will lose a lot due to the 'victory of bribery and corruption among its own high-ranking officials'

The Goliath Auz government has a lot to lose from the victory of corruption and bribery. Justice to David Zheng! (David and Goliath 2025 Real Story)

The Australian government was unfairly subjected to public violence three times in a row, and the 'true story of trial plaintiff Zheng, who was the first to report large-scale corruption among high-ranking Australian government officials, contributing 18 million USD to the Australian government's treasury and winning a civil trial in June 2024, became a beggar' is no longer a story that is only talked about quietly in some parts of Western Australia.

As time passes, it will become known throughout Australia and Asia, and will inevitably become known in the United States and Europe as well. 'The story of corruption and bribery in the Australian government is not simple, and the problem is that the structure is still ongoing and consequently protected by the Australian government,' so it seems likely that it will develop into a fairly large issue.

The Goliath Australian government will lose a lot as a result of 'corruption and bribery committed by its own high-ranking public officials turning the first reporter in good faith into a beggar and protecting the criminal assets of bribed public officials.'

This shameful mistreatment of the Australian government can be prevented very easily at this point.

'The problem is that last November, when I asked the banking supervision bureau about the costs associated with concluding my trial, it clearly be stated US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau. There is evidence of this conversation. (Posted on November 22, 2024)'

I Ask the Australian authorities to investigate this with the same intensity they are investigating now.

The problem is that the Goliath Australian government neither acknowledges nor investigates its own mistakes and wrongdoings, and through the hypocrisy and coercion of its large physique, it insists on unreasonable logic in order to rob the weaponless trial plaintiff of his winning survival assets and clings only to the execution of internationally shameful atrocities by public power, such as double punishment and double billing.

I even went so far as to say that I would only receive compensation within the amount of the $60,000 remittance fee paid last week and would give up the remaining compensation, so I asked the Attorney General of Western Australia to request an end to the trial. (The Attorney General of Western Australia rejected my pathetic proposal. There is evidence such as remittance fees several times in the conversation, but what the Australian government's Ministry of Justice and the banking supervision bureau have in common is that they do not admit their mistakes at all.)

I'm just sick of the lies from the disgusting Australian attorney general.

To sum up the whole situation now, ‘justice belongs to David Zheng.’

(David and Goliath) The duplicity of Auz govern resulting in large-scale bribery and corruption of high-ranking Auz government official.

(David and Goliath) The duplicity of the Auz govern, which ultimately helps high-ranking Auz govern official who is criminal in large-scale bribery cases.

The Australian government, which does not hesitate to impose double punishment on others, does not admit its own wrongdoing (for which there is clear evidence).

This duplicity of the Australian government ultimately helps high-ranking Australian government officials who are criminals in large-scale bribery cases.

The story of David and Goliath in the Bible features Goliath, who has a huge physique and is heavily armed with thick armor.

Australia, a country and a continent, is similar to Goliath in that it is huge.

And there are two more things in common.

One is that he wears thick armor in that he refuses to admit any wrongdoing (for which there is clear evidence).

In other words, Perth in Western Australia is the only large city, and as such, it is 'the only entity that persistently criticizes others' without any institutions to check abuse of public power.

Second, as soon as I received a notice asking me to pay again on January 23, 2025 (just a few days after the Attorney General of Western Australia received the money as collateral for his life on January 17, believing in the promise of 'This is absolutely final fees' in a government document dated January 6, 2025), I rely solely on email to harshly point out the unfairness of it. 'I am dealing with Goliath like David in the Bible,' he said.

In Australia, a huge country, the capital and large cities such as Sydney and Melbourne are all located towards the east.

But on the other side, in Western Australia, why were so many high-ranking Australian government officials able to commit so many bribery cases?

And even though I, the victim of the high-ranking public official in the bribery case and the first reporter, am the plaintiff in the civil trial, won the trial in June 2024, I become a beggar due to the Australian government's violation of its written promise/double punishment/double billing during the trial's conclusion. Conversely, will a high-ranking Australian government official who is a criminal in a large-scale bribery case take the money back and the Australian government ultimately helps?

The key point is that 'the Australian government, which does not hesitate to punish others without even a single speck of double punishment, does not admit its own wrongdoing (for which there is clear evidence) at all.'

To put it another way, 'the Australian government, which does not hesitate to double punishment for others, does not admit its own wrongdoing (for which there is clear evidence) and is only focused on making money (even if it means helping a high-ranking Australian government official who is a criminal in a large-scale bribery case') and is giving up even the minimum of international common sense and humanity.'

The core entity is the banking supervision bureau and its helper, the Australian Attorney General, who arbitrarily control the finances without principle.

Among the Goliath territory of the huge country of Australia, let's take a look at what kind of 'criminal violence by the Australian government, which is extremely contrary to international common sense, continues three times in a row' in Western Australia.

And let's take a look at whether 'I, the informant of the bribery case of the highest-ranking public official in Australia, which brought 18 million won in treasury income to the Australian government', has been fighting like David, relying only on email for the past month.

Now, the Attorney General of Western Australia and the Banking Supervision Bureau are requesting that the government stop assaulting public authorities by allowing high-ranking Australian public officials in large-scale bribery cases, who are ultimately criminals, to take back the money for 'Procedural reasons (self-made, ignoring international standard procedures)' and exercise 'a minimum of conscience based on international common sense' to save 'the dying David, unlike the Bible.'

The Auz government is robbing ‘public interest informant who provided 18m USD to the Auz government by reporting corruption of high-ranking Auz government officials’. (The unconscionability and duplicity of the Australian government is beyond imagination.)