Re: 박테리아 생산 EPS(동형, 이형 다당류)에 대하여 2023년

[문형철]

Microorganisms

. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):1541. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061541

Exopolysaccharides Producing Bacteria: A Review

Alexander I Netrusov 1,2,*, Elena V Liyaskina 3,*, Irina V Kurgaeva 3, Alexandra U Liyaskina 4, Guang Yang 5, Viktor V Revin 3

Editor: Nico Jehmlich

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

PMCID: PMC10304161  PMID: 37375041

Abstract

Bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) are essential natural biopolymers used in different areas including biomedicine, food, cosmetic, petroleum, and pharmaceuticals and also in environmental remediation. The interest in them is primarily due to their unique structure and properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, higher purity, hydrophilic nature, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-cancer, antibacterial, and immune-modulating and prebiotic activities. The present review summarizes the current research progress on bacterial EPSs including their properties, biological functions, and promising applications in the various fields of science, industry, medicine, and technology, as well as characteristics and the isolation sources of EPSs-producing bacterial strains. This review provides an overview of the latest advances in the study of such important industrial exopolysaccharides as xanthan, bacterial cellulose, and levan. Finally, current study limitations and future directions are discussed.

초록

세균성 외부 다당류(EPS)는

생물의학, 식품, 화장품, 석유, 제약 산업 및 환경 복원 분야에서 활용됩니다.

이들에 대한 관심은 주로

생체적합성, 생분해성, 높은 순도, 친수성, 항염증, 항산화, 항암, 항균, 면역 조절 및 프리바이오틱스 활성과 같은

독특한 구조와 특성 때문입니다.

biocompatibility,

biodegradability,

higher purity,

hydrophilic nature,

anti-inflammatory,

antioxidant,

anti-cancer,

antibacterial, and

immune-modulating and

prebiotic activities

본 리뷰는

세균 EPS의 특성, 생물학적 기능, 과학, 산업, 의학, 기술 등 다양한 분야에서의 유망한 응용 분야를 포함하여

현재 연구 진전을 요약합니다.

또한 EPS를 생산하는 세균 균주의 특성 및 분리 원천에 대한 특징도 포함됩니다.

이 리뷰는

샐란, 세균 셀룰로오스, 레반과 같은 중요한 산업용 외부 다당류에 대한 최신 연구 진전을 개괄적으로 소개합니다. 마지막으로 현재 연구의 한계와 미래 방향에 대해 논의합니다.

Keywords: bacterial exopolysaccharides, bacterial strains, xanthan, levan, bacterial cellulose, environmental remediation

1. Introduction

Bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPSs) have recently received significant attention due to their unique structure and properties and the prospects for use in various fields of science, industry, medicine, and technology [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The term exopolysaccharide was first introduced by Sutherland in 1972 [7] for high molecular weight carbohydrate biopolymers produced by microorganisms. Bacterial EPSs have a diverse structure and are secreted by a wide range of bacteria [8]. Depending on their localization, bacterial EPS are divided into capsular polysaccharides that are closely associated with the cell surface, and free slime polysaccharides loosely attached or even totally secreted into the extracellular environment [3,9]. EPSs synthesized by bacteria have an advantage over those isolated from plants (cellulose, starch, and pectin), animals (glycogen and chitin), and algae (agar, fucoidan, carrageenans, and alginates). Bacterial EPSs can be obtained regardless of the season and weather conditions on an industrial scale. They are extracellular slime that is easily released from cells into the environment. Therefore, the methods for their extraction from the cell-free supernatant are quite simple and cost-effective. Bacteria multiply rapidly and are characterized by metabolic flexibility and a variety of physiological and biochemical properties. By means of the methods for optimizing cultivation conditions, genetic and metabolic engineering, it is possible to modulate the yield as well as the structural and functional properties of bacterial EPSs [9,10,11,12]. Bacterial EPS are characterized by the presence of a large number of functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, acetate, etc.), that enable them to modify their molecules in order to impart new valuable properties to them [13]. Therefore, recent interesting reviews by Aditya et al. and Aziz et al., have presented the modification of bacterial cellulose (BC) using chemical and physical methods to obtain nanocomposites and fabricate materials with improved functionality for biomedical applications [13,14]. Generally, EPS are classified into two types: homopolysaccharides, which are either unbranched or branched and composed of single-type monosaccharides such as glucose and fructose linked through glycosidic bonds, and heteropolysaccharides, which contain two or more units of different monosaccharides (glucose, fructose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose, fucose, N-acetylglucosamine, and uronic acids) [4,8]. Homopolysaccharides are divided into α-D-glucans (dextran, alternan, and reuteran), β-D-glucans (bacterial cellulose), fructans (levan and inulin), and polygalactans. Heteropolysaccharides are polymers such as xanthan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, kefiran, and gellan [4,15]. EPSs biosynthesis in bacteria occurs intra- and extracellularly. There are four general mechanisms for EPS biosynthesis in bacterial cells; they are the Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathway, the ABC transporter-dependent pathway, the synthase-dependent pathway, and extracellular biosynthesis by sucrase protein [2,4]. Homopolysaccharides are usually synthesized using the synthase and extracellular synthesis pathways, while heteropolysaccharides are synthesized by the Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathway and the ABC transporter-dependent pathway.

1. 서론

박테리아 외부 다당류(EPSs)는

독특한 구조와 특성, 과학, 산업, 의학, 기술 등 다양한 분야에서의 활용 가능성으로 인해

최근 많은 관심을 받고 있습니다[1,2,3,4,5,6].

외부 다당류라는 용어는 1972년 Sutherland에 의해

미생물이 생성하는 고분자 탄수화물 생물고분자를 지칭하기 위해

처음 도입되었습니다[7].

세균 EPS는

다양한 구조를 가지고 있으며

다양한 세균에 의해 분비됩니다 [8].

위치에 따라 세균 EPS는

세포 표면에 밀접하게 연관된 캡슐 다당류와

세포 외 환경에 느슨하게 결합되거나

완전히 분비되는 자유 점액 다당류로 구분됩니다 [3,9].

세균이 합성하는 EPS는

식물(셀룰로오스, 전분, 펙틴),

동물(글리코겐, 키틴),

조류(아가르, 후코이단, 카라기난, 알긴산)에서 분리된 EPS에 비해

장점을 가지고 있습니다.

세균 EPS는

계절이나 기상 조건에 관계없이 산업 규모로 생산 가능합니다.

이들은

세포에서 환경으로 쉽게 방출되는

세포외 점액입니다.

따라서

세포가 없는 상청액에서 EPS를 추출하는 방법은

매우 간단하고 비용 효율적입니다.

세균은 빠르게 증식하며

대사 유연성과 다양한 생리적 및 생화학적 특성을 갖추고 있습니다.

배양 조건 최적화, 유전공학 및 대사공학 방법을 통해

세균성 EPS의 수율뿐만 아니라

구조적 및 기능적 특성을 조절할 수 있습니다 [9,10,11,12].

세균성 EPS는

수산기, 카르복실기, 카르보닐기, 아세테이트 등

다양한 기능 그룹을 포함하고 있어 분자를 변형시켜

새로운 유용한 특성을 부여할 수 있습니다 [13].

따라서

Aditya 등[13]과 Aziz 등[14]의 최근 흥미로운 리뷰에서는

화학적 및 물리적 방법을 통해

세균 셀룰로오스(BC)를 변형하여 나노복합체를 제조하고

생체 의학 응용을 위한 기능성이 향상된 소재를 제작하는 방법을 제시했습니다.

일반적으로

EPS는 두 가지 유형으로 분류됩니다:

단일 유형의 단당류(글루코스, 프럭토스 등)가

글리코시드 결합을 통해 연결된 분지되지 않거나 분지된 구조를 가진 동형 다당류와,

두 가지 이상의 서로 다른 단당류 단위(글루코스, 프럭토스, 갈락토스, 만노스, 라만노스, 포도당, 프럭토스, 갈락토스, 만노스, 라만노스, 포도당, 프럭토스, 포도당, 포도당, 포도당, 포도 (글루코스, 프럭토스, 갈락토스, 만노스, 라만노스, 푸코스, N-아세틸글루코사민, 우론산) [4,8].

동형 다당류는

α-D-글루칸(데크스트란, 알테르난, 레우테란),

β-D-글루칸(세균 셀룰로오스),

프럭탄(레반, 인울린),

폴리갈락탄으로 나뉩니다.

이형 다당류는

샐란, 알지네이트, 히알루론산, 케피란, 게란과 같은 폴리머입니다 [4,15].

박테리아에서의 EPS 생합성은

세포 내외에서 발생합니다. 박테리아 세포에서의 EPS 생합성에는

네 가지 일반적인 메커니즘이 있습니다.

이들은

Wzy/Wzy 의존적 경로,

ABC 운반체 의존적 경로,

합성효소 의존적 경로, 및

설크레이스 단백질에 의한 세포외 생합성입니다 [2,4].

동형 다당류는 일반적으로 합성효소 및 세포외 생합성 경로를 통해 합성되며,

이형 다당류는 Wzx/Wzy 의존적 경로 및 ABC 운반체 의존적 경로를 통해 합성됩니다.

EPS-producing bacteria belong to different phylogenetic groups and include Gram-negative bacteria of such classes as the Alphaproteobacteria class including Acetobacter, Gluconobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Komagataeibacter, Kozakia, Neoasaia, Agrobacterium, Rhizobium, and Zymomonas genera; the Betaproteobacteria class including Alcaligenes and Achromobacter genera; and the Gammaproteobacteria class including Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Alteromonas, Pseudoalteromonas, Xanthomonas, Halomonas, Erwinia, Vibrio, and Klebsiella genera. They also include Gram-positive bacteria of such classes as Bacilli including Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Streptococcus genera; class Clostridia including Sarcina sp.; and class Actinomycetia including Bifidobacterium, Rhodococcus genera, and others [2,16,17]. Some of the most commonly used EPSs are xanthan from the genus Xanthomonas, dextran from the Leuconostoc, Streptococcus, and Lactobacillus genera, alginate from the Azotobacter and Pseudomonas genera, curdlan from Alcaligenes faecalis, Rhizobium radiobacter, and Agrobacterium sp., gellan from the Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas genera, hyaluronan from Streptococcus sp., levan from Bacillus sp., Paenibacillus sp., Halomonas sp., and Zymomonas sp., bacterial cellulose from Komagataeibacter sp., and others. There are also known polysaccharides such as fucogel produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae, clavan produced by Clavibacter michiganensis, fucoPol produced by Enterobacter sp., and kefiran produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens [6]. The importance attached to the commercial applications of EPSs contributes to the rapid search for new producers’ isolation, characteristics, and the production of new EPSs in order to obtain novel functional materials with a wide range of applications. Therefore, novel EPSs from extremophilic and marine bacteria have attracted researchers’ attention for their potential to be used in various fields including medicine, food, environmental protection, etc. [18,19]. In addition, recently, researchers have paid significant attention to EPSs produced by probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus) for various applications, particularly in medicine [15,20,21,22,23,24].

EPS를 생성하는 세균은 다양한 계통군에 속하며,

그 중 그람 음성 세균에는 알파프로테오박테리아 계통군에 속하는

아세토박터, 글루코노박터, 글루코노아세토박터, 코마가타에이버터, 코자키아, 네오아사야, 아그로박터, 리조비움, 지모노마스 속;

베타프로테오박테리아 계통군에 속하는

알칼리제네스 및 아크로모박터 속;

감마프로테오박테리아(Gammaproteobacteria) 계통에는

아조토박터(Azotobacter), 가이모노박터(Pseudomonas), 엔테로박터(Enterobacter), 알테로모나스(Alteromonas), 가이모노알테로모나스(Pseudoalteromonas), 샬토모나스(Xanthomonas), 할로모나스(Halomonas), 에르비니아(Erwinia), 또한

Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc 및 Streptococcus 속을 포함한 Bacilli 계통;

Sarcina sp.를 포함한 Clostridia 계통;

Bifidobacterium, Rhodococcus 속 및 기타 속을 포함한 Actinomycetia 계통과 같은

그람 양성균도 포함됩니다 [2,16,17].

가장 널리 사용되는 EPS 중 일부는

Xanthomonas 속의 샐란,

Leuconostoc 속의 데크스트란,

Streptococcus, 및 Lactobacillus 속, Azotobacter 및 Pseudomonas 속의 알지네이트,

Alcaligenes faecalis, Rhizobium radiobacter, 및 Agrobacterium sp.의 커드란, S

phingomonas 및 Pseudomonas 속의 게란,

Streptococcus sp.의 히알루론산,

Bacillus sp.의 레반,

Paenibacillus 속, Halomonas 속, Zymomonas 속, Komagataeibacter 속의 세균 셀룰로오스, 기타 등이 있습니다.

또한 Klebsiella pneumoniae에 의해 생성되는 fucogel, Clavibacter michiganensis에 의해 생성되는 clavan, Enterobacter 속의 fucoPol, Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens에 의해 생성되는 kefiran [6]과 같은 알려진 다당류도 있습니다.

EPS의 상업적 응용에 대한 중요성은 새로운 생산균의 분리, 특성 분석, 및 새로운 EPS 생산을 위한 연구를 촉진하고 있습니다. 이는 다양한 응용 분야에 적용 가능한 새로운 기능성 재료 개발을 목표로 합니다. 따라서 극한 환경균과 해양균에서 유래한 새로운 EPS는 의학, 식품, 환경 보호 등 다양한 분야에서 활용 가능성으로 인해 연구자들의 주목을 받고 있습니다 [18,19]. 또한 최근에는 프로바이오틱 박테리아(Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus)에서 생산된 EPS가 다양한 응용 분야, 특히 의학 분야에서 주목받고 있습니다 [15,20,21,22,23,24].

The biological role of bacterial EPSs is diverse. They protect cells against extreme temperature [25,26], salinity [27], aridity [28], UV-rays, unfavorable pH values, osmotic stress, phagocytosis, and chemical agents (antibiotics, heavy metals, and oxidants) [2]. Most marine bacteria secrete polysaccharides, which are important for their survival in the marine environment [25]. EPSs have a cryoprotective effect, in particular, for arctic bacteria [26]. The bioethanol producer Zymomonas mobilis is able to grow in media with an alcohol concentration of up to 16% that can be explained by the protective effect of the EPSs formed by it; the first of them consists of mannose, and the second contains galactose [29]. EPSs play an important role in bacterial adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation and are the main fraction of the biofilm matrix both in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [30,31,32]. EPSs of the biofilm matrix promote horizontal gene transfer, and intercellular interactions prevent the dehydration of bacteria and provide protection against external agents including antibiotics. Therefore, biofilm formation is associated with higher antibiotic resistance and is an important surgical problem. Understanding the composition of biofilms and each component function is crucial to the development of new therapeutics against infections caused by pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterobacter sp.). Therefore, the review by Balducci et al. (2023) described the structure and the role of different EPSs in bacterial biofilms of pathogens and provided an overview of potentially novel antimicrobial therapies capable of inhibiting biofilm formation by targeting EPS [32]. EPS plays an important role in controling virulence not only of human pathogens but also those of plants. Xanthan produced by the phytopathogenic bacteria Xanthomonas spp. is one of the virulence factors involved in the specific interaction of bacteria with the plant [33,34]. EPSs of pathogenic Agrobacterium species are also involved in the adhesion of bacterial cells during infection [35,36].

박테리아 EPS의 생물학적 역할은

다양합니다.

이들은 극한 온도 [25,26], 염분 [27], 건조 [28], 자외선, 불리한 pH 값, 삼투압 스트레스, 식균 작용, 화학 물질(항생제, 중금속, 산화제) [2]로부터 세포를 보호합니다.

대부분의 해양 세균은 해양 환경에서 생존에 중요한 역할을 하는 다당류를 분비합니다 [25].

EPS는 특히 북극 세균에 대해 냉동 보호 효과를 나타냅니다 [26].

바이오에탄올 생산균 Zymomonas mobilis는 EPS가 형성하는 보호 효과로 인해 알코올 농도 16%까지의 배지에서 성장할 수 있으며, 이 중 첫 번째 EPS는 만노스를, 두 번째는 갈락토스를 포함합니다 [29].

EPS는 세균의 부착, 집합, 생물막 형성에 중요한 역할을 하며,

그람 양성균과 그람 음성균 모두에서 생물막 매트릭스의 주요 구성 성분입니다 [30,31,32].

생물막 매트릭스의 EPS는

수평적 유전자 전달을 촉진하며,

세포 간 상호작용은 세균의 탈수화를 방지하고 항생제를 포함한 외부 요인으로부터 보호합니다.

따라서 생물막 형성은 항생제 내성과 관련이 있으며 중요한 수술적 문제입니다. 생물막의 구성과 각 구성 요소의 기능을 이해하는 것은 병원체에 의한 감염을 치료하기 위한 새로운 치료법 개발에 필수적입니다 (Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, 및 Enterobacter sp.). 따라서 Balducci 등(2023)의 리뷰는 병원성 세균의 생물막에서 다양한 EPS의 구조와 역할을 설명하고, EPS를 표적으로 하여 생물막 형성을 억제할 수 있는 잠재적으로 새로운 항균 치료법에 대한 개요를 제공했습니다 [32]. EPS는 인간 병원체뿐만 아니라 식물 병원체의 독성 조절에도 중요한 역할을 합니다. 식물 병원균인 Xanthomonas spp.가 생산하는 샐러틴은 세균과 식물 간의 특정 상호작용에 관여하는 독성 인자 중 하나입니다 [33,34]. 병원성 Agrobacterium 종의 EPS는 감염 과정에서 세균 세포의 부착에도 관여합니다 [35,36].

The growing number of publications devoted to bacterial EPSs in the last decade is primarily related to the prospects for their practical application (Figure 1). Bacterial EPSs have many unique beneficial properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-toxicity, the ability for gelation, high adhesive ability, viscoelasticity, pseudo-plasticity, and thixotropic nature. EPS also showed the potential to withstand various environmental stresses such as elevated temperature, extreme pH, freeze-thaw, and high salt concentrations. Therefore, they have extensive commercial applications in food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, chemical, textile, oil, and gas industries as thickeners, emulsifiers and suspension stabilizers, flocculants, and additives improving the quality of various products [37]. In addition, some bacterial EPSs also possess antitumor [38,39,40,41], antioxidant [41,42], anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, cholesterol-lowering, prebiotic [43], wound healing, and immunomodulatory activities [44]. The biocompatibility and functional properties of EPSs are important factors that promote their use in various biomedical applications [45], such as tissue engineering [46,47], wound dressing [48,49], and drug delivery systems [50,51]. EPSs have shown good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical strength, which are beneficial to form biological scaffolds [43]. EPSs are potential carriers for valuable medicine, including growth factors and antitumor drugs [52,53,54]. Antibiotics are widely used as a model for drug delivery release with bacterial EPSs [55]. New bacterial polysaccharides have been obtained for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [56] and diabetes [51]. EPSs can also be used for wastewater treatment from heavy metals and organic pollutants including dyes, pharmaceutical compounds, and petroleum products [57,58,59,60,61,62]. EPSs are attracting special attention as biopolymers to produce new biocomposite materials for a wide range of applications. The composites based on EPSs can be given antibacterial, wound healing, conductive, magnetic, optical, and other properties [14,63,64,65].

최근 10년간 세균 EPS에 대한 연구 논문 수가 급증한 것은

주로 그 실용적 응용 가능성에 기인합니다 (그림 1).

세균 EPS는

생체적합성, 생분해성, 무독성, 겔화 능력, 높은 접착력, 점탄성, 가소성, 티크로피시성 등

많은 독특한 유익한 특성을 가지고 있습니다.

EPS는

고온, 극한 pH, 동결-해동, 고염 농도 등

다양한 환경 스트레스에 견딜 수 있는 잠재력을 보여주었습니다.

따라서 EPS는

식품, 제약, 화장품, 화학, 섬유, 석유, 가스 산업 등에서

증점제, 유화제, 현탁 안정제, 응집제, 제품 품질 개선 첨가제 등으로

광범위한 상업적 응용 가능성을 가지고 있습니다 [37]. 또

한 일부 세균성 EPS는

항종양 [38,39,40,41], 항산화 [41,42], 항염증, 항균, 항바이러스, 콜레스테롤 저하, 프리바이오틱 [43],

상처 치유, 면역 조절 활성 [44].

EPS의 생체적합성과 기능적 특성은

다양한 생물 의학 응용 분야에서의 활용을 촉진하는 중요한 요인입니다 [45],

예를 들어 조직 공학 [46,47], 상처 드레싱 [48,49], 약물 전달 시스템 [50,51] 등입니다. EPS는 생체적합성, 생분해성, 기계적 강도를 갖추어 생물학적 지지체 형성에 유리합니다 [43].

EPS는 성장 인자 및 항암제와 같은

귀중한 약물의 운반체로 잠재력을 가지고 있습니다 [52,53,54].

항생제는 세균 EPS를 이용한 약물 전달 방출의 모델로 널리 사용됩니다 [55]. 알츠하이머 병 치료를 위한 새로운 세균 다당류가 개발되었습니다 [56] 및 당뇨병 [51]. EPS는 염료, 의약품 화합물, 석유 제품 등 중금속 및 유기 오염물질로부터의 폐수 처리에도 활용될 수 있습니다 [57,58,59,60,61,62]. EPS는 다양한 응용 분야를 위한 새로운 생체 복합 재료 생산을 위한 생체 고분자로서 특별한 관심을 받고 있습니다. EPS를 기반으로 한 복합 재료는 항균성, 상처 치유, 전도성, 자성, 광학성 등 다양한 특성을 갖출 수 있습니다 [14,63,64,65].

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Bacterial EPS properties, biological activity, application, and sources.

Despite the unique properties of bacterial EPS, and great prospects for their practical application, the number of them that are industrially produced is extremely limited. This is primarily due to the low productivity of bacterial strains, which have not yet reached the industrial application level, and, consequently, the high cost of the resulting products. In general, bacterial EPSs are formed in an amount from 0.29 to 65.27–100 g/L depending on their type, the type of microorganism, and the cultivation conditions. The maximum EPSs yield is observed in the producer of levan (up to 100 g/L) [66], dextran (up to 66 g/L) [67], kurdlan (up to 48 g/L) [67], and xanthan (up to 40 g/L) [67]. The bacteria forming bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid have low productivity (usually not more than 10 g/L) [68]. Therefore, further research is needed to set up a highly efficient production of EPSs. The main ways to reduce costs include cheap culture media usage, the isolation of novel highly productive strains, and the creation of more productive strains using genetic engineering. Genetic and metabolic engineering strategies are currently employed to increase EPSs production. In addition, EPSs production can be increased through the development and improvement of technological processes. The yield, structure, and physical-chemical properties of EPSs depend on many factors such as the cultivation condition, source of carbon, C/N ratio, pH of media, and cultivation time. The cultivation conditions of the producer (temperature, pH, amount of oxygen, and bioreactor type) have a significant effect on EPS biosynthesis. It is generally accepted that the production of most bacterial EPS requires a high content of a carbon source in the medium and limited nitrogen nutrition. To obtain bacterial EPS, the main carbon sources that are used are glucose and sucrose. Since the cost of culture media is about 30% of the cost of the entire fermentation process, a large number of media are currently offered based on industrial and agricultural waste [68]. Biocatalytic technologies are also a promising direction for obtaining bacterial EPS. An interesting review by Efremenko et al. (2022) presents recent results and achievements in biocatalysis [67]. The authors note that a common feature of all these catalysts in such processes is an increased concentration of cells and their transition to a quorum sensing (QS) state. QS provides the activation of EPSs synthesis [69,70] as protective, stabilizing, and reserve substances for highly concentrated microbial populations, which is a natural mechanism to increase the amount of these biopolymers and can be used as a nature-like technology in their industrial production. Therefore, the aim of this review was to summarize the current research progress on bacterial EPSs with special attention paid to the bacterial cellulose-, xanthan-, and levan-producing bacteria.

박테리아 EPS의 독특한 특성과 실용적 적용에 대한 큰 전망에도 불구하고,

산업적으로 생산되는 종류는 극히 제한적이다.

이는 주로 산업적 적용 수준에 아직 도달하지 못한 박테리아 균주의 낮은 생산성과

결과적으로 발생하는 제품의 높은 비용 때문이다.

일반적으로 박테리아 EPS는

유형, 미생물 종류 및 배양 조건에 따라 0.29~65.27~100 g/L의 양으로 형성됩니다.

최대 EPS 생산량은

레반(최대 100 g/L) [66], 덱스트란(최대 66 g/L) [67],

쿠르들란(최대 48 g/L) [67], 잔탄(최대 40 g/L) [67] 생산균에서 관찰된다.

박테리아 셀룰로오스와 히알루론산을 형성하는 균주는

생산성이 낮습니다(보통 10 g/L 미만)[68].

따라서

고효율 EPS 생산 체계를 구축하기 위한 추가 연구가 필요합니다.

비용 절감의 주요 방법으로는

저렴한 배지 사용, 신규 고생산성 균주 분리, 유전자 공학을 통한 생산성 향상 균주 개발 등이 있습니다.

현재 EPS 생산 증대를 위해

유전자 및 대사 공학 전략이 활용되고 있다.

또한 공정 기술의 개발 및 개선을 통해

EPS 생산량을 높일 수 있다.

EPS의 수율, 구조, 물리화학적 특성은

배양 조건, 탄소원, C/N 비율, 배지 pH, 배양 시간 등 다양한 요인에 따라 달라진다.

생산균의 배양 조건(온도, pH, 산소량, 생물반응기 유형)은

EPS 생합성에 상당한 영향을 미친다.

대부분의 세균성 EPS 생산에는

배지 내 높은 탄소원 함량과 제한된 질소영양 공급이 필요하다는 것이 일반적으로 인정된다.

세균성 EPS 생산을 위해 주로 사용되는 탄소원은

포도당과 자당이다.

배지 비용이 전체 발효 공정 비용의 약 30%를 차지하기 때문에,

현재 산업 및 농업 폐기물을 기반으로 한 다양한 배지들이 제안되고 있다[68].

생물촉매 기술 역시 박테리아 EPS 획득을 위한 유망한 방향이다. Efremenko 등(2022)의 흥미로운 리뷰는 생물촉매 분야의 최근 성과와 진전을 제시한다[67]. 저자들은 이러한 공정에서 모든 촉매의 공통적 특징이 세포 농도 증가와 쿼럼 센싱(QS) 상태로의 전환이라고 지적한다. QS는 고농도 미생물 군집을 위한 보호·안정화·비축 물질로서 EPS 합성을 활성화한다[69,70]. 이는 이러한 생체고분자의 양을 증가시키는 자연적 메커니즘이며, 산업적 생산에서 자연 친화적 기술로 활용될 수 있다. 따라서 본 리뷰의 목적은 박테리아 셀룰로오스, 잔탄, 레반 생산 박테리아에 특별히 주목하여 박테리아 EPS에 관한 현재 연구 진전을 종합하는 데 있다.

2. Bacterial Cellulose-Producing Bacteria

Cellulose is the most abundant polymer on earth and is primarily produced by plants; however, some microorganisms are also the producers of this polysaccharide. Bacterial cellulose (BC) has attracted much attention over the last years as a unique biomaterial with ultrafine fibrous network architecture and exceptional physicochemical and mechanical properties including high purity, high surface area, high polymerization degree (up to 8000), and high crystallinity (up to 90%) as well as superior mechanical properties (Young’s modulus about 15–35 GPa and tensile strength of 200–300 MPa), high water-holding capacity, lightweight, transparency, flexibility, good biocompatibility, good biodegradability, renewability, and non-toxic, non-immunogenic features [12,71,72,73,74,75]. Furthermore, most properties of BC are superior to plant-derived cellulose. Among others, BC fibers are about 100 times thinner than plant-derived cellulose (20–100 nm) and can hold water that exceeds a hundredfold their dry weight [12]. Bacterial celluloses’ unique properties are highly dependent on bacterial species.

BC is produced by Gram-negative bacteria of the genera Komagataeibacter (Gluconacetobacter) [76,77], Acetobacter [78], Gluconobacter [79], Agrobacterium [80], Achromobacter [81], Enterobacter [82,83], Rhizobium [84], Pseudomonas [85], Salmonella [86], and others, as well as Gram-positive bacteria of the genera Bacillus [87], Sarcina, and Rhodococcus [88]. The most common and highly productive BC producers are acetic bacteria species of the Komagataeibacter genus such as K. xylinus and K. hansenii. The Komagataeibacter genus belongs to the Acetobacteraceae family, class Alphaproteobacteria, phylum Proteobacteria. It was named after the famous Japanese microbiologist Dr. Kazuo Komagata, a Professor at the University of Tokyo, who made a great contribution to the taxonomy of bacteria, especially acetic bacteria. Komagataeibacter genus was separated from the plant-associated Gluconacetobacter on the basis of a 16S rRNA gene sequence and several morphological and physiological properties such as the inability to produce 2,5-diketo-d-gluconate as well as water-soluble brown pigment from glucose [89,90,91]. As of April 2023, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) includes the Komagataeibacter genus containing 19 species: K. cocois, K. diospyri, K. europaeus, K.hansenii, K. intermedius, K. kakiaceti, K. kombuchae, K. maltaceti, K. medellinensis, K. melaceti, K. melomenusus, K. nataicola, K. oboediens, K. pomaceti, K. rhaeticus, K. saccharivorans, K. sucrofermentans, K. swingsii, and K. xylinus. Table 1 presents the type strains of the species of Komagataeibacter genus, the sources of their isolation and general properties of the genome sequences [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. In addition, complete genome sequences were obtained of the following strains of the genus Komagataeibacter: K. xylinus NBRC 3288 [100], K. nataicola RZS0111 [101], K. hansenii ATCC 53582 [102], K. xylinus E25 [103], K. xylinus CGMCC 2955 [104], K. xylinus E26, and K. xylinus BCRC 12334 [105], K. xylinus CGMCC 17276 [106], K. rhaeticus ENS9b [107], K. rhaeticus ENS 9a1a [108], K. nataicola RZS01 [109], K. saccharivorans JH1 [109], K. europaeus GH1 [110], and K. intermedius ENS15 [111]. All Komagataeibacter genomes are characterized by a high % GC content, which is the highest for K. rhaeticus LMG 22126T (63.5%) and the lowest for K. hansenii JCM 7643T (59.3%) [112].

2. 박테리아 셀룰로오스 생산 박테리아

셀룰로오스는 지구상에서 가장 풍부한 고분자로 주로 식물에 의해 생산되지만, 일부 미생물 또한 이 다당류의 생산자이다. 박테리아 셀룰로오스(BC)는 초미세 섬유 네트워크 구조와 높은 순도, 높은 표면적, 높은 중합도(최대 8000), 높은 결정성(최대 90%) 및 우수한 기계적 특성(영의 계수 약 15~35GPa, 인장 강도 200~300MPa)을 포함한 탁월한 물리화학적 및 기계적 특성을 지닌 독특한 생체 재료로서 지난 몇 년 동안 많은 관심을 받아 왔습니다. (영률 약 15–35 GPa, 인장 강도 200–300 MPa), 높은 수분 보유력, 경량성, 투명성, 유연성, 우수한 생체 적합성, 우수한 생분해성, 재생 가능성, 무독성 및 비면역원성 특성 등을 지닌 독특한 생체 재료로 주목받아 왔다 [12,71,72,73,74,75]. 또한 BC의 대부분의 특성은 식물 유래 셀룰로오스보다 우수합니다. 특히 BC 섬유는 식물 유래 셀룰로오스보다 약 100배 가늘며(20–100 nm), 건조 중량의 100배를 초과하는 수분을 보유할 수 있습니다[12]. 박테리아 셀룰로오스의 독특한 특성은 박테리아 종에 크게 의존합니다.

BC는 그람 음성균인 Komagataeibacter (Gluconacetobacter) [76,77], Acetobacter [78], Gluconobacter [79], Agrobacterium [80], Achromobacter [81], Enterobacter [82,83], Rhizobium [84], Pseudomonas [85], Salmonella [86] 등의 그람음성균과 Bacillus [87], Sarcina, Rhodococcus [88] 등의 그람양성균에서 생산됩니다. 가장 흔하고 생산성이 높은 BC 생산균은 K. xylinus 및 K. hansenii와 같은 Komagataeibacter 속의 아세트산균 종입니다. 코마가타에이버터커 속은 아세토박터과(Acetobacteraceae), 알파프로테오박테리아강(class Alphaproteobacteria), 프로테오박테리아문(phylum Proteobacteria)에 속한다. 이 속명은 특히 아세트산균 분류학에 큰 공헌을 한 도쿄대학 교수이자 저명한 일본 미생물학자인 코마가타 가즈오(Kazuo Komagata) 박사의 이름을 따서 명명되었다. 코마가타에이버터커 속은 식물 관련 글루코나세토박터(Gluconacetobacter)로부터 16S rRNA 유전자 서열 및 포도당으로부터 2,5-디케토-d-글루코네이트와 수용성 갈색 색소를 생성하지 못하는 등 여러 형태학적·생리학적 특성에 근거하여 분리되었다[89,90,91]. 2023년 4월 기준, 명명법상 유효한 원핵생물 명칭 목록(LPSN)에는 코마가타에이버터크 속(Komagataeibacter)이 포함되어 있으며, 이 속에는 19종이 속한다: 코코이스(K. cocois), 디오스피리(K. diospyri), 유로파에우스(K. europaeus), 한세니(K. hanseni), K. intermedius, K. kakiaceti, K. kombuchae, K. maltaceti, K. medellinensis, K. melaceti, K. melomenusus, K. nataicola, K. oboediens, K. pomaceti, K. rhaeticus, K. saccharivorans, K. sucrofermentans, K. swingsii, K. xylinus. 표 1은 코마가타에이버터크(Komagataeibacter) 속 종의 대표 균주, 분리 원천 및 게놈 서열의 일반적 특성을 제시한다 [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. 또한 Komagataeibacter 속의 다음 균주에 대한 완전한 게놈 서열이 확보되었습니다: K. xylinus NBRC 3288 [100], K. nataicola RZS0111 [101], K. hansenii ATCC 53582 [102], K. xylinus E25 [103], K. xylinus CGMCC 2955 [104], K. xylinus E26, K. xylinus BCRC 12334 [105], K. xylinus CGMCC 17276 [106], K. rhaeticus ENS9b [107], K. rhaeticus ENS 9a1a [108], K. nataicola RZS01 [109], K. saccharivorans JH1 [109], K. europaeus GH1 [110], 및 K. intermedius ENS15 [111]. 모든 코마가타에이버터크 게놈은 높은 % GC 함량을 특징으로 하며, K. rhaeticus LMG 22126T (63.5%)가 가장 높고 K. hansenii JCM 7643T (59.3%)가 가장 낮습니다 [112].

Table 1.

General properties of the type strains of species of the genus Komagataeibacter.

NoSpeciesSources of IsolationNumber of Bases (bp)DNA G + C Content (mol%)Ref.

1	K. cocois WE7T (CGMCC 1.15338T; JCM 31140T)	Contaminated coconut milk, China	3,406,946	62.7	[92]
2	K. diospyri MSKU 9T (NBRC 113802T; TBRC 9844T)	Persimmon, Thailand	3,762,373	60.4	[93]
3	K. europaeus LMG 18890T (ATCC 51845T; DES 11T; DSM 6160T)	Submerged culture vinegar generator, Germany	4,227,398	61.3	[90]
4	K. hansenii JCM 7643T (DSM 5602T; ATCC 35959T; BCC 6318 T)	Vinegar, Israel	3,710,965	59.3	[94]
5	K. intermedius TF2T (DSM 11804T; BCC 36457T; JCM 16936T; LMG 18909T; BCC 36447T; BCRC 17055T; CIP 105780T)	Kombucha beverage, Switzerland	3,883,532	61.6	[95]
6	K. kakiaceti JCM 25156T (DSM 24098T; G5-1T; LMG 26206T; NRIC 798T; BCRC 80743T)	Kaki vinegar, Japan	3,133,102	62.1	[96]
7	K. kombuchae LMG 23726T (MTCC 6913T; RG3T)		3,483,869	59.6	[94]
8	K. maltaceti LMG 1529T (IFO 14815T; NBRC 14815T; NCIB 8752T; NCIMB 8752T)	Malt vinegar brewery acetifier	3,638,012	63.2	[96,97]
9	K. medellinensis NBRC 3288T (IFO 3288T); Kondo 51T; LMG 1693T)	Vinegar, Japan	3,136,818	60.9	[96,98]
10	K. melaceti AV382T (ZIM B1054T; LMG 31303T; CCM 8958T)	Apple vinegar	3,629,663	59.14%	[99]
11	K. melomenusus AV436T (ZIM B1056T; LMG 31304T; CCM 8959T)	Apple cider Vinegar, Kopivnik, Slovenia			[99]
12	K. nataicola LMG 1536T (BCC 36443T; JCM 25120T; NRIC 616T)	Nata de coco, Philippines	3,672,972	61.5	[90,98]
13	K. oboediens LMG 18849T (BCC 36445T; CIP 105763T; DSM 11826T JCM 16937T; NCIMB 13557T; LTH 2460T;BCRC 17057T)	Submerged red wine vinegar, Germany	3,777,265	61.4	[90]
14	K. pomaceti T5K1T (CCM 8723T; LMG 30150T; ZIM B1029T)	Apple cider vinegar, Slovenia	3,449,370	62.5	[94]
15	K. rhaeticus LMG 22126T (DSM 16663T, BCC 36452T; JCM 17122T; DST GL02T;CIP 109761T)	Apple juice, South Tyrol region, Italy	3,465,200	63.5	[90,98]
16	K. saccharivorans LMG 1582T (BCC 36444T; JCM 25121T; NRIC 614; CIP 109786T; CECT 7869T; NCCB 29003T;NRIC 0614T)	Beet juice, Germany	3,350,941	61.6	[90,98]
17	K. sucrofermentans LMG 18788T (DSM 5973T; BCC 7227T; JCM 9730T; BPR 2001T; ATCC 700178T; BCRC 80162T; CECT 7291T;CIP 106078T)	Black cherry, Tokyo, Japan	3,363,922	62.3	[90]
18	K. swingsii LMG 22125T (DSM 16373T; BCC 36451T; JCM 17123; DST GL01T; CIP 109760T)	Apple juice, South Tyrol region, Italy	3,732,982	62.4	[90]
19	K. xylinus LMG 1515T (ATCC 23767T; DSM 6513T; BCC 7226T; JCM 7644T; NBRC 15237T; NCIMB 11664T; BCRC 2952T; CCM 3611T; CCUG 37299T; CECT 7351T; CIP 103107T; IFO 15237T; NCTC 4112T; VTT E-97831T)	Mountains ash berries	3,660,954	66.2	[90,98]

Open in a new tab

Cellulose-producing bacterial cells of the genus Komagataeibacter are Gram-negative, rod-shaped, and single or paired; some of them are in the form of short chains, and their size is about 0.4–1.2 µm in width and 1.0–3.0 µm in length [77,113]. The colonies of cellulose-synthesizing strains are jelly-like, rounded, and uplifted in the center (Figure 2B) [77,114,115]. The dissolution of calcium carbonate on the Acetobacter agar plate indicates the presence of acid-forming bacteria. Numerous recently isolated BC producers belong to the genus Komagataeibacter. Many strains were isolated from the kombucha community: K. kombuchae LMG 23726T [94], K. hansenii GH-1/2008 (VKPM B-10547) [116], K. xylinus B-12068 [117], K. rhaeticus P 1463 [118], K. rhaeticus K3 [119], K. intermedius AF2 [120], K. sucrofermentans B-11267 (Figure 2) [77], and others. The kombucha community (Medusomyces gisevii J. Lindau) is a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast that is commonly abbreviated as SCOBY [121]. The microbial community in kombucha varies between geographic origin and cultural conditions [122,123]. According to the literature data, kombucha microflora may contain over 22 species including acetic acid bacteria of the family Acetobacteraceae and lactic acid bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus, as well as yeasts Zygosaccharomyces spp., Saccharomyces spp., Dekkera spp., and Pichia spp. [124]. Recently, a number of studies have been performed using metagenomics, comparative genomics, synthetic community experiments, and metabolomics to quantify community microbial diversity [122,125,126]. Therefore, Landis et al. (2022) determined the taxonomic, ecological, and functional diversity of 23 distinct kombuchas in the United States and demonstrated the bacterium Komagataeibacter rhaeticus and the yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis to be the most common microbes in these communities [122]. In addition, Kahraman-Ilikkan showed that the dominant bacterium in kombucha samples from Turkey was Komagataeibacter obediens, and the dominant fungus was Pichia kudriavzevii, and also found propionic and butyric acid-producing bacteria such as Anaerotignum propionicum and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens [123].

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

K. sucrofermentans B-11267 isolated from the kombucha community (A). The colony morphology (B). Cell morphology (scale bar: 5 μm) (C). Gel film obtained in static conditions (D). Gel film after purification (E). AFM (atomic force microscopy) image of BC (F). BC agglomerates of various shapes formed in agitated culture conditions (G,H). BC aerogel (I).

Komagataeibacter strains are highly acetic acid resistant (15–20%) and the dominant species in vinegar production processes [127]. Therefore, many strains were isolated from vinegar including Komagatabacter (Gluconacetobacter) sp. RKY5 [128], K. medellinensis LMG 1693T [129], K. medellinensis [130], K. europaeus LMG 20956 [130], K. melaceti AV382T [99,130], K. hansenii DSM 5602T [130], and others. Therefore, Marič et al. (2020) isolated the two novel strains AV382 and AV436 from a submerged industrial bioreactor apple cider vinegar production in Kopivnik (Slovenia) [99]. These strains represent novel species of the genus Komagataeibacter, with the names K. melaceti sp. nov. and K. melomenusus being proposed for them, respectively. The type of strain of K. melaceti is AV382T (=ZIM B1054T = LMG 31303T = CCM 8958T) and that of K. melomenusus is AV436T (=ZIM B1056T = LMG 31304T = CCM 8959T). Recently, Ni et al. (2022) conducted a study with three new strains isolated from rice vinegar, among which Acetobacter pasteurianus MGC-N8819 showed a relatively high BC yield of 6.6 g/L on the Hestrin–Schramm (HS) medium [78]. Greser and Avcioglu (2022) isolated the strain K. maltaceti from grape vinegar and the strain K.nataicola from apple vinegar, which formed BC in amounts of 6.45 g/L and 5.35 g/L, respectively [131]. K. intermedius [132], G. swingsii [133], K. rhaeticus DSM 16663T [130], G. rhaeticus [133], Komagatabacter (Gluconacetobacter) sp. gel_SEA623-2 [134], Gluconacetobacter sp. F6 [135], K. maltaceti SKU 1109 [130], K. diospyri MSKU 9T [93], and K. saccharivorans JH1 [109] were isolated from fruit and fruit juices; K. cocois WE7T was isolated from coconut milk [92]; K. nataicola LMG 1536T was isolated from “Nata-de Coco” [130]; and K. hansenii B-12950 was isolated from the Tibicos symbiotic community [77]. A new species of thermotolerant bacterium Komagataeibacter diospyri sp. nov. designated MSKU 9T was isolated from persimmon [93].

BC plays an important role in bacterial physiology and ecology [136,137,138,139,140,141,142]. For example, BC film on the medium surface ensures the maintenance of an aerobic environment [141]. The water-holding capacity of vegetable cellulose reaches 60%, while the water-holding capacity of BC is 100% of its dry weight. Thus, it protects the cells from drying out. BC is supposed to form a kind of “framework” protecting cells against external agents including antibiotics, heavy metal ions, and UV exposure [137]. BC producers can exhibit symbiotic or pathogenic relationships with plants, animals, or fungi. And in this case, BC serves as a kind of molecular glue to ensure interactions in nature [136]. For example, BC is involved in the adhesion of bacterial cells of the genus Rhizobium during symbiosis with leguminous plants, Agrobacterium and Salmonella in infection, contributing to the colonization of plants providing protection against competitors [35,84,86]. Cellulose and its derivatives are important components of biofilms and play a significant role in regulating the virulence of plant and human pathogens [32,137,138]. Biofilm formation is an effective strategy by which bacterial cells establish relationships in a unique environment [32]. The role of BC-containing biofilms is to establish close intercellular and host-bacteria interactions. A biofilm gives bacteria the ability to undergo horizontal gene transfer, which provides antibiotic resistance, inhibits bacterial dehydration, and protects them from extreme conditions such as mechanical stress and antibiotic treatment. Cell-to-cell communications in a biofilm proceed, among other things, with the participation of a regulatory mechanism called “quorum sensing” (QS). Information is exchanged using specialized chemical signaling molecules, through which the microbial community acts as a single organism [142]. Cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) is an intracellular signaling molecule that regulates the transition from a planktonic state in the environment to a surface-associated biofilm for many bacteria including Agrobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Salmonella sp., Vibrio sp., Pseudomonas sp., and others [80,84,140,143]. The review by Augimeri et al. (2015) highlighted the diversity of BC biosynthesis and regulation and its role in environmental interactions by discussing diverse biofilm-producing Proteobacteria [136]. The review by Balducci et al. (2023) described the exopolysaccharides that are most commonly found in the biofilm matrix of pathogens causing infections in humans and their functions in forming and maintaining the EPS matrix. Biofilms are an important surgical issue since they can form on a chronic wound or implantable medical devices [32]. E. coli and Salmonella sp. are among the most studied pathogenic bacteria producing cellulose. Recently, E. coli and Salmonella species have been discovered to produce chemically modified cellulose with phosphoethanolamino groups. This modification seems to have multiple functions in the extracellular matrix: it is required to form long cellulose fibrils and a tight nanocomposite with curli fibers, it may confer resistance against attacks by cellulase-producing microorganisms, and it can prevent curli from hyper stimulating immune responses [144]. Finally, there are bacteria known to secrete cellulose; however, specific secretion mechanisms have not been identified so far. For example, pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been shown to secrete biofilm-promoting cellulose both in vitro and in granulomatous lesions in the lungs of infected hosts in vivo [145]. These data suggest that the cellulose-rich extracellular matrix contributes to mycobacterial drug tolerance, simultaneously protecting the pathogen against triggering immune responses in the host.

Despite the biological and practical significance of BC, the molecular mechanism of its biosynthesis is only just starting to emerge due to the improvement of next-generation sequencing technologies, the publication of the genome sequences of numerous BC producers, and the increased availability of genetic tools [112,137]. Recently, many reviews of the latest advances in structural and molecular biology in BC biosynthesis have been published. The review by McNamara et al. (2015) presented a detailed molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis [146]. The review by Li et al. (2022) showed the research progress of biosynthetic strains and pathways of bacterial cellulose [88]. Abidi et al. (2022) reviewed current mechanistic knowledge on BC secretion with a focus on the structure, assembly, and cooperativity of BCs secretion system components [147]. An interesting review by Manan et al. (2022) provided a comprehensive overview of the molecular regulation of the intracellular biosynthesis of cellulose nanofibrils, their extracellular transport, and their organization into highly ordered supramolecular structures [12]. The authors discussed in detail the role of different operons involved in BC biosynthesis and their regulation to achieve high yield and productivity through the genetic engineering of BC-producing strains. The review by Ryngajłło et al. (2020) discussed the current progress in the systemic understanding of Komagataeibacter physiology at the molecular level [112]. The authors presented examples of the approaches, as well as genetic engineering strategies for strain improvement in terms of BC synthesis intensification.

In general, bacterial cellulose biosynthesis comprises three steps including uridine diphosphate glucose synthesis through a series of enzymatic reactions, cellulose molecular chain synthesis under the function of cellulose synthase, and cellulose crystallization and polymerization. The cellulose synthase (CS) complex is encoded by cellulose synthase operons known as bcs operons. The bcs operons regulate intracellular biosynthesis, extracellular transport across the cellular membranes, and in vitro assembly of cellulose fibrils into highly ordered structures [12]. In Gram-negative bacteria, CS is comprised of a four-subunit transmembrane complex, where the BcsA, BcsB, and BcsC subunits are responsible for the synthesis and extracellular transport of glucan chains, while the fourth one, BcsZ (formerly known as BcsD), resides in the periplasm and performs the endo-β-1,4-glucanase activity. One of the well-characterized mechanisms regulating cellulose biosynthesis is the allosteric activation of BcsA with a cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) molecule, a universal bacterial second messenger discovered in K. xylinus [112]. The independent research revealed an important regulatory role of c-di-GMP for motility, virulence, and biofilm formation [137]. An interesting article by Liu et al. (2018) presented a comprehensive approach to studying the molecular mechanisms of BC biosynthesis and metabolism regulation based on a complete genome analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus CGMCC 2955 and other BC producers whose genomes were sequenced completely [104]. A complete genome sequence is needed as background information for genetic engineering to achieve precise control of BC biosynthesis based on metabolic regulation. The authors made a comparison of the arrangement and composition of BC synthase operons (bcs) with those of other BC-producing strains. In addition, they demonstrated the presence of QS in G. xylinus CGMCC 2955 and proposed a possible regulatory mechanism action of QS on BC production [104].

Despite numerous studies conducted in recent years, the large-scale production of BC remains quite expensive. This is mainly due to the low productivity of bacterial strains, which, as a rule, do not exceed 5 g/L BC. According to the review by Li et al. (2022), the maximum BC yield did not exceed 20 g/L, which has not yet reached the level of industrial application [88]. Recently, several reviews on the genetic modification of bacterial strains for enhancing BC production were reported [148,149]. The review by Singhania et al. (2021) presented the mechanisms and targets for genetic modifications in order to achieve the desired changes in the BC production titer as well as its characteristics [148]. The authors note that the lack of studies on a genetic modification for BC production is due to the limited information on the complete genome and genetic toolkits; however, over the past few years, the number of studies in this area has increased, since the whole genome sequencing of several strains of Komagataeibacter has been performed. Genetic engineering enables the modification of the genetic material of Komagataeibacter to increase the product yield, reduce the risk of deleterious mutations, and improve or change cellulose properties such as crystallinity, mechanical strength, and porosity, which is suitable for specific applications. Along with the above-mentioned advantages, there are certain problems including methodological problems of transformation and the issues related to the regulatory process complexity, when each gene can express a protein performing more than one function [148]. However, there have been several attempts at genetic engineering for BC-producing bacteria. For example, Kuo et al., generated a G. xylinus mutant by knocking out the membrane-bound glucose dehydrogenase gene via homologous recombination of a defect in the gene, which led to the formation of cellulose from glucose without generating gluconic acid and a 40% increase in BC production [150]. Japanese scientists obtained the recombinant E. coli bacteria capable of forming BC resulting from the transfer of G. xylinus genes [151]. A new stable efficient plasmid-based expression‎ system of recombinant BC in the E. coli DH5_ platform has currently been developed [152].

Furthermore, BC production can be increased through the development and improvement of technological processes, such as the optimization of the nutrient medium, culture conditions, cultivation methods, and the development of cell-free culture systems. About 30% of the total cost of the process is known to be the cost of the nutrient medium [153]. The most frequently used medium is the Hestrin–Schramm (HS) medium, which includes some expensive components, such as glucose, yeast extract, peptone, citric acid, and disodium phosphate, resulting in costly production. In order to reduce the cost, researchers attempted to produce cellulose from various alternative substrates, particularly, agro-wastes, pulp mills and lignocellulosic wastes, biodiesel industry wastes, acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation wastewater, and others [68,154,155]. BC production also depends on a cultivation technique. Under static cultivation, bacteria form cellulose in the form of a film on the medium surface (Figure 2D). Under agitated conditions, most strains form cellulose in the form of agglomerates of various shapes depending on the medium composition and mixing modes (Figure 2G,H) [77,156,157,158]. There are many reports analyzing static and agitated conditions for cellulose production by Komagataeibacter as well as other bacteria, where a static culture generally gave higher yields compared to agitated cultures [159], but there are reports of higher BC yields with the agitated culture [160]. However, such a comparison is not always justified without taking into account the time and growing conditions. Furthermore, cell-free culture, the synthesis without living cells, shows great development prospects [161,162,163]. Cell-free culture could reduce the cost of BC production, decrease the metabolic inhibitors, and significantly improve the efficiency of enzymatic reactions [162]. In addition, an effective co-cultivation of Komagataeibacter with the producers of other polysaccharides was reported, which led to an increased BC yield, and can be used to obtain nanocomposites with improved functional characteristics [164].

Highly efficient BC production will enable the expansion of the scope of the polysaccharide with unique properties. BC is an attractive biopolymer for a number of applications including food, biomedical, cosmetics, and engineering fields. The review by Cubas et al. (2023) reported BC to be a new era in Green Chemistry products [165]. In the past five years, there have been many interesting, detailed reviews describing BC production, properties, and applications [43,65,68,71,72,73,74,76,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179]. BC has great potential to be used in medicine [2,3,43,71,72,73,74,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,179] as a biomaterial for wound dressing [180,181,182,183,184,185,186], tissue engineering [187,188,189,190,191,192], and drug delivery systems [51,193,194,195,196,197]. In addition, BC can be used in the food industry as a nutritional component, food packaging, an emulsion stabilizer, and novel food [165,198,199,200]. BC is known as a fiber-rich natural food that offers many health benefits and reduces the risk of chronic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases [199]. In 1992, BC was recognized safe by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and in 2019, the species K. sucrofermentans was included in the list of Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) recommended biological agents and intentionally added to food (novel food) [199]. Furthermore, BC can be used in the cosmeceutical industry [65,201,202]; the environmental industry as a matrix to immobilize catalysts, enzymes, and other sensory materials, both to detect environmental pollutants and also decompose various wastes from heavy metals, fluorine, organic pollutants including dyes, pharmaceutical compounds, and petroleum products [68,203,204,205,206]; in nanoelectronics (sensors, optoelectronic devices, flexible display screens, energy storage devices, and acoustic membranes) [167,207,208,209,210,211,212,213]; for microbial enhance of oil recovery [83]; in the textile industry [214]; and in biocatalytic technologies as a carrier for microorganisms or enzymes for various approaches [67,68,71].

3. Levan-Producing Bacteria

Levan is one of the most promising microbial EPSs for a wide range of biotechnological applications due to its beneficial functional properties such as anticancer [215,216,217], antioxidant [218], antibacterial [215,218], anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory [219], and prebiotic activities [220], as well as unique physicochemical properties such as high adhesive strength, low intrinsic viscosity, high water solubility, film-forming ability, heat stability, and high biocompatibility [221,222,223]. Levan is a neutral homopolysaccharide composed of fructose units connected by β-2,6-glycoside bonds in the backbone and β-2,1 in its branches.

Many bacteria are capable of synthesizing levan, including Gram-negative bacteria of the class Alphaproteobacteria, Acetobacter, Gluconobacter [224,225,226], Komagataeibacter (Gluconacetobacter) [227], and Zymomonas [228,229,230] genera, and those of the class Gammaproteobacteria, Pseudomonas [231], Halomonas [232,233], and Erwinia [234] genera, as well as Gram-positive bacteria of the class Bacilli: Bacillus [235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245], Paenibacillus [246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260], Lactobacillus [261], Leuconostoc [262] genera, etc. Currently, more than 100 bacteria species have been shown to produce levan [222]. The most studied levan producers among Gram-positive bacteria are the species of the class Bacilli including Bacillus subtilis [243,244,245], Bacillus licheniformis [241], Paenibacillus polymyxa [246,248,250,256,257,258,259,260], Lactobacillus reuteri [261], Leuconostoc citreum [262], and others. These bacteria were isolated from different sources. Therefore, the probiotic Bacillus tequilensis-GM was isolated from Tunisian fermented goat milk [235]. B. siamensis was isolated from fermented soybeans and was found to produce levan at high sucrose concentrations [236,237]. A new EPS-producing Gram-positive bacterium B. paralicheniformis was isolated from the rhizosphere of Bouteloua dactyloides (buffalo grass), which produced a large amount (~42 g/L) of levan having a high weight average molecular weight of 5.517 × 107 Da [238]. Many species of marine bacteria of the genus Bacillus can synthesize levan. For example, a strain of Bacillus sp. SGD-03 produces a levan with a molecular weight of 1.0 × 104 Da with a maximum yield of 123.9 g/L [239]. B. paralicheniformis ND2 was isolated from the seawater of the Mediterranean Sea, Egypt, followed by screening for levan-type fructan production, which yielded 14.57 g/L [240]. Levan produced by the B. aryabhattai GYC2-3 strain had a high average molecular weight (5.317 × 107 Da) [242], while levan from B. licheniformis 8-37-0-1 had a low molecular weight (2.826 × 104 Da) [241]. The sucrose concentration was found to be the critical component in modulating the molecular weight of synthesized levan. Using a low sucrose concentration (20 g/L) in a culture of B. subtilis (natto) Takahashi resulted in predominantly high molecular weight levan (>2 × 106 Da). In contrast, low molecular weight levan (6–9 × 103 Da) was the preval‎ent EPS when a high sucrose concentration (400 g/L) was used [243]. Bacteria of the genus Bacillus can synthesize a significant amount of levan. It was shown that in cultivation for 21 h in media supplemented with 20% sucrose, B. subtilis (natto) can produce up to 40–50 g/L of levan [244]. During batch and continuous cultivation in a bioreactor, the levan yield was 61 and 100 g/L, respectively [243]. Moreover, the B. subtilis strain CCT 7712 was able to synthesize up to 111.6 g/L of levan from 400 g/L sucrose media during 16 h cultivation [245].

Paenibacillus polymyxa, the type species of the genus Paenibacillus, is mainly isolated from plant-associated environments. For example, P. polymyxa 92, isolated from wheat roots, produced large amounts (38.4 g/L) of exopolysaccharide in a liquid nutrient medium containing 10% (w/v) sucrose and may serve as a basis for eco-friendly low-cost soil-remediation technologies owing to levan production exhibiting metal-binding ability, low viscosity in an aqueous solution, and plant-growth-regulating activity [246]. The P. lautus strain was isolated from Obsidian Hot Spring in Yellowstone National Park [247]. A new strain of P. polymyxa S3 with an antagonistic effect on 11 major fish pathogens was screened from the sediment of fishponds [248]. P. antarcticus IPAC21, the psychrotolerant bioemulsifier levan-producing strain, was isolated from the soil collected in Ipanema, King George Island, Antarctica [249]. Its genome was sequenced using Illumina Hi-seq, and a search for genes related to the production of bioemulsifiers and other metabolic pathways was carried out. The IPAC21 strain has a genome of 5,505,124 bp and a G + C content of 40.5%. Mamphogoro et al. (2022) reported the whole-genome sequence of P. polymyxa SRT9.1, a plant growth-promoting bacterium consisting of 6,754,470 bp and 7878 coding sequences, with an average G + C content of 45% [250]. Revin and Liyaskina et al. obtained a highly productive strain Paenibacillus polymyxa 2020, first isolated from wasp honeycombs capable of producing a greater amount of levan compared to the known P. polymyxa strains (Figure 3) [66]. The complete genome sequencing and methylome analysis of P. polymyxa 2020 were performed. The complete genome sequence of P. polymyxa 2020 is also available in GenBank with the accession numbers: CP049598-CP049599. The original sequence reads have been deposited at NCBI under SRA: SRR11236808; SRR11236809; SRR11236810; SRR11236811. Biosample: SAMN14247689. Bioinformatic analysis identified a putative levan synthetic operon. SacC and sacB genes were cloned; their products were identified as glycoside hydrolases and levansucrase. The highest levan yield of 68.0 g/L was obtained on a molasses medium with a total sugar concentration of 200 g/L. The highest yield of EPS in the sucrose medium was 53.78 g/L with 150 g/L sucrose at 96 h. Additionally, compared to the media with sucrose, in the molasses medium, the maximum polysaccharide production was achieved over a shorter time interval (48–72 h).

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Paenibacillus polymyxa 2020, first isolated from wasp honeycombs (A). The colony morphology (B). Cell morphology (C). Chromosome map (D). SEM image of EPS (E). Adapted with permission from Ref. [66].

Paenibacillus spp. EPSs recently have attracted great attention due to their biotechnological potential in different industrial and wastewater treatment processes [251,252]. As of April 2023, according to the website List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the genus Paenibacillus contains 374 species. The type of strain of P. polymyxa ATCC 842T (=DSM 36T = KCTC 3858T) has been deposited in a number of microbial collections. The bacterium was very often associated with the plant root microbiome, where it participates in bioprotection by the synthesis of antibiotics, phytohormones, hydrolytic enzymes, and EPS [256]. The genome sequences of 212 strains of Paenibacillus representing 82 different species are available [251]. The genome sizes range from 3.02 Mb for P. darwinianus Br isolated from Antarctic soil [253] to 8.82 Mb for P. mucilaginosus K02 implicated in silicate mineral weathering [254], and the number of genes varies from 3064 for P. darwinianus Br to 8478 P. sophorae S27. The insect pathogens P. darwinianus, P. larvae, and P. popilliae have smaller genomes from 4.51 and 3.83 Mb, respectively, which is likely to reflect their niche specialization. The GC content of Paenibacillus DNA ranges from 39 to 59% [255]. Complete genome sequencing and assembly has been done for strains such as P. polymyxa E681 [257], P. polymyxa SC2 [258], P. polymyxa ATCC 842T [259], P. polymyxa 2020 (isolated from wasp honeycombs) [66], P. polymyxa KF-1, soil isolated producer of antibiotics [260], and Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10 [247], isolated from Obsidian Hot Spring in Yellowstone National Park, Montana, USA. Most of the deposited genome sequences are still in shotgun form.

An EPS synthesizing potentially probiotic Gram-positive bacterial strain Lactobacillus reuteri was isolated from fish guts, and its EPS was structurally characterized. Based on molecular weight (MW) distribution, two groups of levan were found to be produced by the isolate FW2: one with a high MW (4.6 × 106 Da) and the other having a much lower MW (1.2 × 104 Da). The isolate yielded about 14 g/L levan under optimized culturing parameters [261]. The levan yield of the strain Leuconostoc citreum BD1707 reached 34.86 g/L with an MW of 2.320 × 107 Da within 6 h cultivation [262].

Many Gram-negative acetic acid bacteria (AAB) of the Alphaproteobacteria class are also levan producers. Acetobacteraceae are known for their production of high-value homopolysaccharides such as levan [224,225,226]. Gluconobacter japonicus LMG 1417 is a potent levan-forming organism. A cell-free levan production based on the supernatant of the strain under study led to a final levan yield of 157.9 ± 7.6 g/L, and the amount of secreted levansucrase was more than doubled by plasmid-mediated homologous overproduction of LevS1417 in G. japonicus LMG 1417 [224]. K. xylinus, the producer of bacterial cellulose can also produce levan [227]. The good levan producer Pseudomonas fluorescens strain ES, with promising antioxidant and cytotoxic activity against different kinds of cancer cells, was isolated from soil in Egypt [231]. Possible levan producers were also identified among Gram-negative halophilic Gammaproteobacteria of the Halomonas genus [232] including Halomonas smyrnensis AAD6T [233]. Their ability to grow in high concentrations of NaCl can be used to solve the problem of sterility in an industrial setting. The type of strain H. smyrnensis sp. nov. AAD6T (=DSM 21644T = JCM 15723T) was isolated in Turkey [233]. Zymomonas mobilis also produces levan. The strains ZAG-12 [228] and ATCC 31821 [229] were able to produce levan with approximate yields of 14.67 and 21.69 g/L, respectively. In continuous cultivation of Z. mobilis CCT4494, when immobilized in Ca-alginate gel, the amounts of levan were reported to be able to range from 18.84 up to 112.53 g/L depending on the incubation time [230]. Levan-type EPS is also produced by such Gammaproteobacteria as Pantoea agglomerans ZMR7. The maximum levan production (28.4 g/L) was achieved when sucrose and ammonium chloride were used as carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively, at 35 °C and an initial pH of 8.0 [263]. Gammaproteobacteria Erwinia amylovora, the causative agent of fire blight, is also a levan producer [234]. Several recombinant E. coli and yeasts were developed to study the biochemistry of levan synthesis by cloning and expression‎ of levansucrase genes from L. mesenteroides and B. amyloliquefaciens [264,265,266,267,268,269].

Levan is synthesized by levansucrase (E.C 2.4.1.10), a fructosyltransferase belonging to the family of glycoside hydrolases [221]. Levansucrase binds to a substrate, such as sucrose, and adds fructose molecules to a growing fructose chain [221]. In Gram-negative bacteria, levansucrase is secreted through a single peptide pathway, which promotes sucrose hydrolysis and levan formation through transfructosylation activity [270]. A high concentration of substrate has been found to inhibit levansucrases in Gram-negative bacteria since the interaction of enzyme-substrate occurs in the periplasmic space resulting in the accumulation of enzyme and product, while in Gram-positive bacteria, this is not observed due to the presence of peptidoglycan wall [222]. In terms of its biological role, levan is involved in biofilm formation in some bacteria [271,272] and also contributes to the fitness and virulence of plant pathogens [221,273]. Further, in soil-resident bacteria, levan promotes salt tolerance and desiccation, as well as the formation of cell aggregates on abiotic surfaces [272]. In addition, levan can serve as a source of reserve substance under starvation conditions [221]. Moreover, levan has been suggested to promote the colonization of bacteria in the gut [274] and to act as a prebiotic in vitro [275,276].

Levan is an industrially important, functional biopolymer widely applied in food, biomedicine, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical fields owing to its safety and biocompatibility. In the food industry, levan can be used as a gelling agent, as well as a food supplement with prebiotic properties [220,277,278]. Moreover, microbial levan can be a good source of pure fructose production. The bio-degradable film obtained with levan has a high potential to be used in different areas, especially in food packaging [279]. In the biomedical sectors, levan has many applications due to its biocompatibility and antibacterial [215,218], anticancer [215,216,217], antioxidant [218], anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory [219], and prebiotic activities [220]. Levan was described as an effective therapeutic agent in some human conditions, such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. Levan treatment is a promising therapeutic strategy for neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma cells [216,217]. Levan is a promising biopolymer to develop nanomaterials. Due to its amphiphilic properties, the main application of levan so far is the production of nanoparticles. For example, vancomycin was encapsulated in levan nanoparticles of 200–600 nm [280].

Nanoparticle complexes with levan could be proposed as potent drug delivery vehicles for cancer drugs, as well as other drugs in prospective studies [281,282]. Kim et al., encapsulated a marker (indocyanine green) in levan nanoparticles (100–150 nm) for tumor imaging [283]. Tabernero et al., attached 5-fluorouracil on levan nanoparticles for colorectal cancer treatment [282]. Silver and gold nanoparticles were previously coated with this polymer to be used as a catalyst [284] or a bactericidal system [222]. There were obtained from levan-based nanoparticles with resveratrol, which can be used in drug delivery systems, wound healing, and tissue engineering [285]. Levan nanoparticles can also be used as drug carriers for peptides and proteins [280]. In addition, it can provide biocompatible surfaces, especially in tissue engineering [286,287,288]. Sulfated levan can be considered a promising material for cardiac tissue engineering applications [287]. It is related to its excellent biocompatibility and anticoagulant activity. Gomes et al., developed self-adhesive free-standing multilayer films from sulfated levan combined with alginate and chitosan [286]. The presence of sulfated levan significantly improved the mechanical strength and adhesiveness of the constructed adhesive films. The multilayer films were cytocompatible and myoconductive, which was assessed through in vitro testing on a myoblast cell line, C2C12. Levan nanocomposite films have the potential to be used in industrial and medical fields [289]. Levan also has appropriate properties for cosmetic applications, for example, in safe and functional body wash cosmetics production [290,291]. Levan has a film-forming potential and high adsorption properties. Therefore, it can be used as an adsorbent for heavy metals in industrial wastewater treatment [246]. Furthermore, levan has higher adhesive properties than carboxymethyl cellulose and can be used for wood bonding. Its availability as a biological binder to obtain wood biocomposite materials was shown [292]. The resulting composites were demonstrated to have a more uniform structure and good strength characteristics. Levan is a promising material for obtaining biocomposites. It can be processed with other polysaccharides or functionalized to produce fibers or gels. For example, a sulfated derivative of levan was processed with polycaprolactone (PCL) and polyethyleneoxide (PEO) using electrospinning technology. The obtained microfibers (1–5 microns in diameter) improved blood clotting by adding levan. The work indicated the potential of using levan in blends to produce anti-thrombogenic compounds [288].

4. Xanthan-Producing Bacteria

Xanthan is one of the industrially most relevant bacterial polysaccharides. Compared to other microbial polysaccharides, its price is competitive, and, therefore, its production is cost-effective [293]. Xanthan is an important industrial biopolymer, which, due to its beneficial properties, has found application in food, oil, pharmaceutical, mining, textile, and other industries [294,295,296,297]. It is environmentally friendly, non-toxic, and has the following unique properties: stability at high temperature and salinity, pseudoplasticity, highly viscous even at very low concentrations, chemical stability for oil well conditions, biodegradability, reasonable cost, and environmental friendliness [298]. The global xanthan gum market was valued at ~USD 1 billion in 2019 and is expected to reach ~USD 1.5 billion in 2027 [4]. Xanthan is an anionic heteropolysaccharide consisting of a cellulose-like backbone of β-1,4-linked glucose units, substituted alternately with a trisaccharide side chain, which is composed of two mannose units separated by a glucuronic acid, where the internal mannose is mostly O- acetylated and the terminal mannose may be substituted by a pyruvic acid residue. Due to the presence of glucuronic and pyruvic acid in the side chain, xanthan represents a highly charged polysaccharide with a very rigid polymer backbone. It has a high molecular weight of about 2 × 106 to 2 × 107 g mol−1.

Xanthan is produced by different Xanthomonas sp. The genus Xanthomonas belongs to the class Gammaproteobacteria of the phylum Proteobacteria. As of April 2023, according to the website List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the genus Xanthomonas contains 53 species, some of which cause economically important diseases in more than 400 host plants [33]. Xanthomonas sp. has two features: the formation of exopolysaccharide xanthan and the formation of specific membrane-bound pigments—xanthomonadins that provide the mucoid and yellow color of the colonies. Xanthomonas cells are usually rod-shaped single-cell ones with a single polar flagellum. The type of strain is Xanthomonas campestris ATCC 33913T (=CFBP 2350T = CIP 100069T = DSM 3586T = ICMP 13T = LMG 568T = NCPPB 528T). The Xanthomonas spp. differentiate further into pathovars depending on the host plant [34,299]. For example, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris is the causal agent of black rot disease affecting many crop plants from the Brassicaceae family [300]. The bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae causes rice bacterial leaf blight, one of the most destructive rice diseases [301]. Bacteria deploy a large arsenal of virulence factors to successfully infect the host plant. In particular, xanthan protects bacterial cells against environmental stresses and supports biofilm formation [299]. QS coordinates bacterial behavior including biofilm dispersal and is required for disease [299]. Currently, Feng et al. (2023) provided a comprehensive review of the recent advances in diffusible signal factor (DSF)-mediated QS in Xanthomonas and reported the inhibitors that are proposed as bactericide candidates to target the RpfF enzyme and control plant bacterial diseases [302]. The QS in Xanthomonas is associated with rpf (regulation of pathogenicity factor) genes, among which, the main genes rpfF, rpfB, rpfC, and rpfG encode proteins involved in DSF synthesis, turnover, sensing, and transduction, respectively [302]. The Xanthomonas genus includes species such as X. campestris, X. arboricola, X. axonopodis, X. fragaria, X. gummisudans, X. juglandis, X. phaseoli, X.vasculorium, and others. The Xanthomonas campestris bacterium is used in industrial production.

The complete genome sequences of many Xanthomonas strains have been determined to date. Liyanapathiranage et al. analyzed 1740 complete genome sequences belonging to 39 Xanthomonas spp. retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), a large proportion of them being from the species X. oryzae (396 genomes), X. citri (195 genomes), X. phaseoli (97 genomes), X. perforans (151 genomes), and X. arboricola (136 genomes) [303].

The authors studied the genetic organization and patterns of evolution of several clusters of the type VI secretion system (T6SS) in order to understand the contribution of T6SS toward the ecology and evolution of Xanthomonas spp. Recently, Cuesta-Morrondo et al. (2022) reported that the resulting X. arboricola pv. pruni IVIA 2626.1 genome comprised two circular contigs, a 5.11 Mb chromosome and a 41.10 kb plasmid, while CITA 33 was composed of a 5.09 Mb chromosome and 41.11 kb plasmid [304]. In addition, Bellenot et al. (2022) reported on draft genome sequences of 17 strains representing eight of nine known races of the pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris causing black rot disease on Brassicaceae crops [305]. Revin et al. obtained a highly efficient xanthan-producing strain, X.campestris M 28, which produced up to 28 g/L of the polysaccharide on a molasses medium (Figure 4). Whole-genome sequencing of the strain was performed using the Illumina method and nanopore sequencing. The genome of X. campestris M 28 contained one chromosome of 5 102 828 nucleotides with an average G + C content of 65.03% [306]. The genomes of the strains X. campestris NRRL B-1459 (ATCC 13951) [307], X. campestris pv. campestris B 100 [308], X. campestris JX [309], X. campestris pv. campestris WHRI 3811 [310], and others, also have been completely described. The size of X. campestris chromosomes was shown to range from 4.8 to 5.1 Mb [307,308,309]. The content of GC bases in the X. campestris chromosome is 63.7–65.3% [307,308,309]. A number of X. campestris strains were established to have plasmids of various lengths responsible for resistance to antibiotics, metals, etc. Xanthomonas genomes comprise different mobile genetic elements, such as transposons, insertion sequence, plasmids, and genomic islands associated with virulence factors, genetic variations, and genome structure [311].

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

X.campestris M 28 isolated from cabbage (A). The colony morphology (B). Xanthan production (C).

Xanthan is synthesized through a Wzy-dependent pathway, which comprises several steps including the synthesis of exopolysaccharide precursors (nucleotide sugars GDP-mannose, UDP-glucose, and UDP-glucuronic acid), repeat-unit assembly on a lipid carrier located at the cytoplasmic membrane, membrane translocation to the periplasmic face, polymerization by a block-transfer mechanism involving Wzy polymerase, and export [312]. The building of pentasaccharide units is under the control of the gum cluster comprising 12 genes involved in the pentasaccharide repeating unit assembly, its decoration with substituents, polymerization, translocation, and secretion [312]. However, the key factors for the xanthan’s precursors’ biosynthesis are the genes xanA and xanB, which are not included in the gum cluster. The xanA and xanB genes are involved in UDP-glucose and GDP-mannose biosynthesis.

Like other EPSs, xanthan yield and quality can be modified using different bacterial strains and fermentation environments (e.g., carbon source, temperature, pH, mixing speed, inoculum volume, and airflow rate). The carbon source is an essential factor in microbial xanthan fermentation, which acts as an energy source and is used in EPS synthesis. Media with complex compositions are most often used to obtain xanthan; these mainly include 2–4% glucose and sucrose and 0.05–0.1% nitrogen sources, such as yeast extract, peptone, and ammonium nitrate [297], and have quite a high cost. Media including various industrial and agricultural wastes have been proposed to reduce the cost of xanthan [306,313]. This also solves the environmental problems of waste disposal, which negatively affect the environment condition. The immobilization of bacteria cells (e.g., X. campestris and X. pelargonii) on calcium alginate-based beads showed higher xanthan yield compared to free cells, irrespective of the carbon source [314].

Xanthan is a biopolymer that has found application in food, petroleum, pharmaceutical, mining, textile, cosmetics, and other industries [3,294,295,296,297,298,315,316,317,318,319]. This polymer is environmentally friendly and non-toxic and, therefore, used in the food industry for the last 50 years as a stabilizer and thickener. Xanthan is a promising material for medical applications since it is a biocompatible polymer and not cytotoxic. Recently, it attracted the particular attention of researchers in connection with the prospects for its use in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and obtaining biocomposites with regenerative and antibacterial properties [4,316,317]. Recently, Barbosa et al. (2023) produced cell-friendly chitosan-xanthan composite membranes incorporating hydroxyapatite to be used in guided tissue and bone regeneration, in particular, for periodontal tissue regeneration [316]. The review by Jadav et al. (2023) described xanthan applications of xanthan in delivering various therapeutic agents such as drugs, genetic materials, proteins, and peptides [317]. Xanthan can be used as a new green-based material to produce superabsorbents and for the remediation of contaminated waters. Sorze et al. (2023) developed novel biodegradable hydrogel composites of xanthan gum and cellulose fibers to be used both as soil conditioners and topsoil covers to promote plant growth and forest protection [318]. The rheological, morphological, and water absorption properties of produced hydrogels were comprehensively investigated. Specifically, the moisture absorption capability of these hydrogels was above 1000%, even after multiple dewatering/rehydration cycles. A recent review by Balíková et al. (2022) highlighted xanthan prospects as green adsorbents for water decontamination [312]. A number of scientists have shown the functional groups of xanthan to be able to bind heavy metals from aqueous solutions and effectively remove them. For example, Wang et al. showed the superior adsorption capacity of xanthan produced by X. campestris CCTCC M2015714 to detoxify lead (II), cadmium (II), and copper (II) polluted waters with an efficiency of 50% in an hour [319]. The review by Dzionek et al. (2022) summarized cross-linking methods that could potentially be used to reduce their toxicity to living cells and demonstrated xanthan availability for whole-cell immobilization with the prospect of using it in bioremediation [320]. The polysaccharide xanthan is considered to be the most commonly used polymer for enhanced oil recovery [298]. It is relatively more stable under harsh conditions and has the necessary rheological properties. Recently, xanthan has received attention for its application in 3D printing technology. At low concentrations, xanthan has shear thinning capacity and required viscosity due to which it can function as a rheological modifier, thus improving 3D printing potential [321,322].

5. Conclusions and Future Perspective

The present review summarizes the current progress in research on bacterial EPS, mainly over the past 5 years, including their properties, biological functions, and promising applications in various fields of science, industry, medicine, and technology. Such EPS as BC, levan, and xanthan are described in detail. The information on the systematic position, sources of isolation and properties of EPS-producing bacteria is presented. Bacteria are characterized by metabolic flexibility and a variety of physiological and biochemical properties. Therefore, using the techniques optimizing cultivation conditions, genetic, and metabolic engineering, it is possible to modulate the yield as well as the structural and functional properties of bacterial EPS. At present, the biochemical and molecular basis of the biosynthesis of BC, xanthan, and levan are well studied. The genomes of a large number of bacteria have been fully sequenced. All this is the basis for the metabolic regulation of EPS biosynthesis and the creation of resistant genetically engineered strains that have not yet been obtained for industrial production. The yield of the most known bacterial EPS is still low enough for industrial production. Therefore, the isolation of new producers and the production of highly productive strains by genetic and metabolic engineering are very relevant. The investigation of unique polysaccharides from marine bacteria and extremophiles is now the focus of scientific research. They have considerable potential in bioremediation, water purification from heavy metal, and marine oil pollution and also in pharmaceutical and biomedical fields as antioxidants, antifreeze, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial agents, etc. Although these EPS are well used in many areas, there are relatively few studies on them compared to land microorganisms, especially the studies on EPS formed in extreme marine environments, partially due to the difficulty of isolation and culture conditions. Therefore, new and updated technical strategies are needed to isolate producers and analyze novel marine microbial EPS. Since the study of bacterial polysaccharides is partly hindered by the incapability of culturing methods, metagenome-based techniques should be used to search for and study new bacterial polysaccharides. In recent years, valuable information has emerged on QS mechanisms in EPS producers. This area requires further study in terms of application for more efficient EPS production. Due to the high cost of EPS production, a large number of publications have recently suggested approaches to solve the problem, in particular, the use of various agricultural and industrial wastes. At the same time, their disposal burning problem is also being solved. Another promising area is biocatalytic technologies and cell-free synthesis to obtain EPS more efficiently. Bacterial EPS are characterized by the presence of a large number of functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, acetate, etc.), which enables them to modify their molecules in order to give them new valuable properties, such as antimicrobial activity, etc. Therefore, a large number of EPS-based biocomposite materials have been obtained. The already developed methodological approaches and the accumulated data on their modification will enable the creation of an even greater number of different functional and structural materials of a new generation with a wide range of applications in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I.N., G.Y. and V.V.R.; methodology, A.I.N., E.V.L. and V.V.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.N., E.V.L. and A.U.L.; writing—review and editing, A.I.N., E.V.L. and V.V.R.; visualization, A.U.L. and I.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data are available from GenBank, NCBI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of the academic leadership program «Priority 2030» (grant number 25-22).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

• 1.Ahuja V., Bhatt A.K., Banu J.R., Kumar V., Kumar G., Yang Y.H., Bhatia S.K. Microbial Exopolysaccharide Composites in Biomedicine and Healthcare: Trends and Advances. Polymers. 2023;15:1801. doi: 10.3390/polym15071801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2.Kaur N., Dey P. Bacterial Exopolysaccharides as Emerging Bioactive Macromolecules: From Fundamentals to Applications. Res. Microbiol. 2022;29:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2022.104024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Mahmoud Y.A.-G., El-Naggar M.E., Abdel-Megeed A., El-Newehy M. Recent Advancements in Microbial Polysaccharides: Synthesis and Applications. Polymers. 2021;13:4136. doi: 10.3390/polym13234136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4.Mohd Nadzir M., Nurhayati R.W., Idris F.N., Nguyen M.H. Biomedical Applications of Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: A Review. Polymers. 2021;13:530. doi: 10.3390/polym13040530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Rana S., Upadhyay L.S.B. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Synthesis pathways, types and their commercial applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;157:577–583. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6.Barcelos M.C.S., Vespermann K.A.C., Pelissari F.M., Molina G. Current status of biotechnological production and applications of microbial exopolysaccharides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;60:1475–1495. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1575791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7.Osemwegie O.O., Adetunji C.O., Ayeni E.A., Adejobi O.I., Arise R.O., Nwonuma C.O., Oghenekaro A.O. Exopolysaccharides from bacteria and fungi: Current status and perspectives in Africa. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04205. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8.Sutherland I.W. Bacterial exopolysaccharides. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 1972;8:143–213. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Xiao M., Ren X., Yu Y., Gao W., Zhu C., Sun H., Kong Q., Fu X., Mou H. Fucose-containing bacterial exopolysaccharides: Sources, biological activities, and food applications. Food Chem. X. 2022;13:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Schmid J., Sieber V., Rehm B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: Biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:496. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11.Pereira S.B., Sousa A., Santos M., Araújo M., Serôdio F., Granja P., Tamagnini P. Strategies to obtain designer polymers based on cyanobacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:5693. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]