Nobel Peace Prize laureate, US
President Barack Obama has been steadfastly pursuing a policy of armed
interventions and conflicts across the globe longer and more
extensively than any other president in recent US history. Now he’s sounding an
advance against Russia, paying no heed to the fact that it may result in world
war followed promptly by mutual nuclear annihilation.
One could hardly make a compelling
argument how else one can explain the statement made by Spokesperson for the US
State Department, Rear Admiral John F. Kirby, other than a direct declaration of
war. The statement reads as follows:
The consequences are
that the civil war will continue in Syria, that extremists and extremists groups
will continue to exploit the vacuums that are there in Syria to expand their
operations, which will include, no question, attacks against Russian interests,
perhaps even Russian cities, and Russia will continue to send troops home in
body bags, and they will continue to lose resources ? even, perhaps, more
aircraft…
2012년 당시에 국무장관이던 힐라리는 내놓고 말했는데, 그게
그녀의 관점에서는 대단한 생각이었다.
소련 연방이 아프간을 침공했을때 우리는 파키스탄에 가서 무자히딘
조직을 창설했다. 그들에게 스팅어 이동식 미사일을 주어서 소련군을 아프간 안에 묶어놨다. 결국 소련군은 아프간을 떠났는데, 우리는 잘되었다!
안녕! 이라고 말했다.
The very same modus operandi was
employed a quarter of a century ago to take down the Soviet Union. In the late
1980’s America decided it was in a position to catch the “evil empire” in an
Afghan trap through the support it would provide armed terrroists that have now
transformed themselves into “moderate terrorists,” including Al-Qaeda. In the
1980’s, Washington took advantage of Saudi wealth and Pakistan’s secret service.
That’s how the so-called Afghan resistance was born, enjoying Pakistani
logistical support and streams of “fresh recruits” from all across the Middle
East.
The former US Secretary of State
and now a presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, openly declared back in 2012
that it was a great idea from her point of view:
When the Soviet Union
invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea that we are going to come to
Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with stinger missiles and
everything else to go after the Soviets inside the Afghanistan. And we were
successful, the Soviets left Afghanistan, and then we said “Great! Goodbye “,
leaving these trained people who where fanatical in Afghanistan and Pakistan,
leaving them well armed, creating a mess…
What Hillary forgot to mention,
however, is the fact that the Mujaheddin movement in Afghanistan was a “breeding
ground” for Al-Qaeda assets. Al-Qaeda was and still is directly controlled by
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to promote a process of Middle Eastern
destabilization, providing US military contractors with an excuse to invade
state, after state, after state.
It’s the very same scenario that
the White House wants to repeat now in Syria. It’s no wonder it allowed the
violent bombardment of Syrian soldiers on 17 September, since it was made in a
bid to spare the lives of Jabhat al-Nusra militants who would have had a hard
time otherwise storming their positions. It should be recalled that in September
2015, the former head of the CIA, David Petraeus, one of the godfathers of US
guerrilla warfare, urged the White House to “fight” ISIS side-by-side with
Jabhat al-Nusra.
After six years of perpetual war
the conflict in Syria is not nearly as “civil” as one would like to believe, it
is a conflict entirely driven externally, not internally. Syria has become
a sort of a Gordian knot, a place where the interests of
Russia, China, EU, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the US have been impossibly
tangled up.
At this stage, Washington is
completely incapable of discussing any serious political settlement in Syria,
since it regards any peace process in this war-torn country as the harbinger of
Moscow’s, Beijing’s and Tehran’s continuous presence in the region and
the moving forward of several energy routes that will gives these states
influence and wealth in the region well into the future, all of which means
there will be no place for the West’s “avid defenders of democracy” at the
table.
That is why the United States
objected so vigorously to the release of the Russian-American cease-fire
agreement details to the public and kept the discussion of the agreement as far
away from the UN as it possibly could, out of fear there could be a UN
resolution adopted that would make it mandatory to comply with.
That is also why, while keeping in
mind its master-plan, Washington has used Syrian territory to start the largest
indirect war in modern history to pursue its consequential transformation in a
direct armed confrontation with Russia. A total of 80 states are fighting both
directly and indirectly in Syria. It is no accident that on May 23, 2003,
instead of gathering Iraqi forces into a single large unit, the US occupation
administration disbanded the Iraqi army, creating pre-conditions for the rise of
ISIS. In January 2012, in the midst of the Syrian civil war, the CIA created a
“branch” of Al Qaeda in Syria ? the notorious Jabhat al-Nusra. It’s no secret
that the militants of this terrorist group at different points of time were
treated in hospitals in Turkey and Israel ? both faithful satellite-states of
Washington. These steps were followed with the approval of the Turkish
military’s invasion of Syria, which was launched on August 20.
러시아 전쟁의 조건을
조성하려고 워싱턴 권력은 대규모 프로퍼갠더 공략을 펼쳤다. 이는 모스크바 당국을 모든 면에서 불신하게끔 만드는 불량화 책략이다. 그래서 올림픽을
앞두고 도핑 스캔들을 만들었고, 우크라이나 포로센코 대통령은 입만열면 러시아 3만의 군대가 우크라이나에 와서 수백대의 전차를 갖고서 전쟁을
한다고 비난하게 만들었다. 이게 아무리 황당한 근거없는 소리였지만 수년간을 똑같은 거짓말로 프로퍼갠더를 돌리면 세계 대중은 러시아가 정말 그런
짓을 했다고 여기게 되는 것이다. 그만큼 프로퍼갠더 책략은 무섭다.
이제 서방 언론은 러시아가
말레이항공기를 격추시키는 만행을 저질렀다고 모략하며 전쟁의 북소리를 울렸다. 과연 이렇게 해서라도 미국은 꼭 러시아와 전쟁을 하려는 것인가?
러시아가 악의 화신이 되어야 전쟁의 이유가 정당화 되는 것인가?
그렇게 전쟁을 해서 무엇을
얻으려하는건가? 만일에 전쟁에서 승리하면 미국에는 무엇이 보장되는가?
To create
preconditions for an open armed conflict with Russia, Washington has launched a
massive propaganda campaign, aimed at discrediting Moscow at every juncture.
It’s enough to remember the so-called “doping scandal” and the “revelations”
that Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko made about the alleged presence of
more than 30,000 Russian soldiers and hundreds of tanks in eastern Ukraine. And
no matter how ridiculous and unfounded such allegations may be, Washington would
still repeat them, as if it had no means to track a couple hundreds tanks
anywhere on the face of the Earth and then provide irrefutable evidence of it to
the public. Moreover, we hear repeated accusations about
Moscow’s alleged involvement in the downing of the Malaysian Boeing MH-17 over
Donbass and many others. And the list goes on. Looking at all these steps, one can’t help
but remember the genius of Nazi propaganda ? Joseph
Goebbels ? who swayed public perception with the continuous repetition of
transparent lies up to and including the day of the Nazi invasion of
Russia.
[Ron: The underlined statement is false German
bashing propaganda which is constantly used to DISTORT any contemperory
discussion of Anglo-US, ie Judaic, genocidal
aggression against gentile nations. The impression given that Germany was a
perfidious lieing nation bent on foreign conquest and aggression is
TOTALLY FALSE! Moreover, Goebbels criticised false propaganda and told the truth
about what global Jewry and its Anglo-US, French and Dutch controlled Allied
military was doing to Germans in Poland and generally. The LIARS in relation to
MH 17 and EVERYTHING ELSE in our world are the Jews and their puppet politicians
and mercenary gentile enablers. Check the AH archives for details. ANY
commentator who spikes his/her commentary with German bashing propaganda such as
this author has just done, IS PART OF THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SOLUTION. Why?
Because such false rhetoric misdirects the dabate away from the ROOT CAUSE of humanity's global distopia
generally, and the particular facts involved in this author's discussion. To
understand the inhernt LIE in this author's throw away line implying that OVER
70 years ago, Germans were despicable liars, be aware that global Jewry under
Churchill, Eisenhower, Roosevelt and Stalin, genodiced 20 milion ethnic Germans
during and after WWII. In other words, STOP swallowing Judaic bullshit if you
want to live in a spiritually healthy
world. ].
Martin Berger is a freelance journalist and
geopolitical analyst, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
