<div class="figure-img" data-ke-type="image" data-ke-style="alignCenter" data-ke-mobilestyle="widthOrigin"><img src="https://t1.daumcdn.net/cafeattach/1YmK3/97aa8b29e48a043dd728a709168aed494d7bff2b" class="txc-image" width="669" height="474" data-img-src="https://t1.daumcdn.net/cafeattach/1YmK3/97aa8b29e48a043dd728a709168aed494d7bff2b" data-origin-width="1010" data-origin-height="715"></div><div class="figure-html" data-ke-type="html" data-source="<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">More from Premier League AGM - <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/avfc?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#avfc</a> proposal to increase allowed PSR losses from £105m to £135m over three-year period has been knocked back. Two clubs voted in favour, with 15 against and 3 abstentions.</p>&mdash; John Percy (@JPercyTelegraph) <a href="https://twitter.com/JPercyTelegraph/status/1798717285575884871?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>"><div data-ke-class="article"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">More from Premier League AGM - <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/avfc?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#avfc</a> proposal to increase allowed PSR losses from £105m to £135m over three-year period has been knocked back. Two clubs voted in favour, with 15 against and 3 abstentions.</p>— John Percy (@JPercyTelegraph) <a href="https://twitter.com/JPercyTelegraph/status/1798717285575884871?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div></div><p>3년동안 허용된 PSR 손실을 105m파운드에서 135m파운드로 늘리려는 아스톤빌라의 제안은</p><p>찬성 2표 반대 15표 기권 3표로 부결되었다.</p>
<!-- -->
