Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance

[논둑길맨발로]

Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and

Resistance

In this majestic tour de force, celebrated historian Peter Lineb takes aim at the thieves of land, the polluters of the seas, the ravagers of the forests, the despoilers of rivers, and the removers of mountaintops. Scarcely a society has existed on the face of the earth that has not had commoning at its heart. "Neither the state nor the market," say the planetary commoners. These essays kindle the embers of memory to ignite our future commons.

From Thomas Paine to the Luddites, from Karl Marx—who concluded his great study of capitalism with the enclosure of commons—to the practical dreamer William Morris—who made communism into a verb and advocated communizing industry and agriculture—to the 20th-century communist historian E.P. Thompson, Linebaugh brings to life the vital commonist tradition. He traces the red thread from the great revolt of commoners in 1381 to the enclosures of Ireland, and the American commons, where European immigrants who had been expelled from their commons met the immense commons of the native peoples and the underground African-American urban commons. Illuminating these struggles in this indispensable collection, Linebaugh reignites the ancient cry, "STOP, THIEF!"

Praise:

"There is not a more important historian living today. Period."
—Robin D.G. Kelley, author of Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination

"E.P. Thompson, you may rest now. Linebaugh restores the dignity of the despised luddites with a poetic grace worthy of the master… [A] commonist manifesto for the 21st century." 
—Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums

"Peter Linebaugh's great act of historical imagination… takes the cliche of 'globalization' and makes it live. The local and the global are once again shown to be inseparable—as they are, at present, for the machine-breakers of the new world crisis."
—T.J. Clark, author of Farewell to an Idea

About Peter Linebaugh:

Peter Linebaugh is a child of empire, schooled in London, Cattaraugus (NY), Washington, D.C., Bonn, and Karachi. He went to Swarthmore College during the civil rights days. He has taught at Harvard University and Attica Penitentiary, at New York University and the Federal Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. He used to editZerowork and was a member of the Midnight Notes Collective. He coauthored Albion's Fatal Tree, and is the author of The London Hanged, The Many-Headed Hydra (with Marcus Rediker), The Magna Carta Manifesto, and introductions to Verso's selection of Thomas Paine's writings and PM's new edition of E.P. Thompson'sWilliam Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. He lives in the region of the Great Lakes and works at the University of Toledo in Ohio.

Product Details:

Author: Peter Linebaugh
Publisher: PM Press/Spectre
ISBN: 978-1-60486-747-3
Published: 02/2014
Format: Paperback
Size: 9x6 
Page count: 304 Pages
Subjects: History/Politics/Economics

1. [FREE PDF] Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance by Peter Linebaugh [PDF] - YouTube

   ► 1:48► 1:48

   www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlDF-QkR8lE

   2014. 3. 11. - 업로더: Jean Boecker

   Download Link : http://www.rarshare.com/stop-thief-the-commons-enclosures-and-resistance-by-peter ...

Stop, Thief!

By Peter Linebaugh

This essay, penned on the 4th of July 2011, is from Peter Linebaugh’s new book Stop Thief! The Commons, Enclosures and Resistance— a compilation of his recent writing on the commons covering everything from Thomas Paine to Occupy Wall Street. Linebaugh—a leading scholar of radical possibilities who coined the word commoning—offers an insightful introduction to the commons and the roots of resistance to protect what rightfully belongs to all of us. —Jay Walljasper - See more at: http://onthecommons.org/magazine/stop-thief#sthash.JQ1hjLoT.dpuf

Often you don’t know of the commons until it is taken away.  The neighborhood without sidewalks, the water fountain that has gone dry, the land that once your family could use. They are taking liberties with what we took for granted.  No more!  Stop, thief!

We’re losing the ground of our subsistence to the privileged and the mighty.  With the theft of our pensions, houses, universities, and land, people all over the world cry, Stop Thief! and start to think about the commons and act in its name.

But what is the commons?  Its 21st century meaning is emerging from the darkness of centuries past. 

Primers were once prayer books for the laity.  Usually the primer refers to the elementary book used to teach children to read.  In another meaning of the word the primer is that which ignites the blasting powder in the old, revolutionary flintlock rifles.

So, here is a primer on the commons and commoning.  It does not contain prayers though the matter here is solemn enough. Finally, if this primer leads to action, detonating greater energy or exploding for the common good, why so much the better.

This short primer notes eighteen of the common places in this discussion (food, health, &c.) .

Food: The potluck, the principle of B.Y.O., the C.S.A. or community supported agriculture, the kitchen, are the profoundest human expressions of commoning. The extra seat at the table, the principle of hospitality, are inseparable from human community.  The meal is at the heart of every religion.  Our daily bread.  Food was “rations” on the unhappy ship; on the happy one, food was the sailor’s commons.

Health: Public health, exercise, sports, prevention of accidents and disease, access to hospitals are dire needs. There was a time when hospitals were places of reception for guests, for strangers, for travellers.  The practice of the hospital was the embodiment of the principle of hospitality.  Salus publica populi romani referred to the goddess of health and well-being, “the public health of the Roman people.”  Surely, her worship in our day has fallen on evil times, as medical, pharmaceutical, and insurance companies in league with government strangle her in their coils.  Once the woodlands were a common pharmacopeia not the private property of Big Pharm.

Security: Militarism and money do not safeguard us.  On 9/11 the most expensive military in the world failed to protect the American people or even its own HQ. Instead, citizen passengers after twenty-three minutes of deliberation and voting were able collectively to disarm United Airlines flight 93.  A sacrificial collective was formed for the common good.  As for the Pentagon, the conclusion is obvious.  Our protection is our mutuality.

Housing: Squatting, the group house, intentional communities, the hobo’s jungle, the boarding house, the homeless camps are rarely anyone’s idea of utopia yet they meet real needs, they arise from direct actions, they are actual mutualism, they enliven dead spaces, they are cooperative.  

Gender: Birth, nurturance, neighborhood, and love are the beginnings of social life.  The commons of the past has not been an exclusively male place.  In fact, it is one very often where the needs of women and children come first. And not “needs” only but decision-making and responsibility have belonged to women from the neighborhoods of industrial “slums” to the matriarchy of the Iroquois confederation to the African village.

Public Space:  Look!  Look at Tahrir Square. Look at the popular mobilizations in Spain.  People are creating spaces in the urban environment where it becomes possible to engage in the conversation and debate that is essential to commoning.  The barber-shop, the corner grocery, the church basement, the ice-cream parlor, the local co-op may not be available.  The town hall has gone and the town square has become a parking lot. So, the first step in commoning is to find a locale, a place, and if one is not easily to hand, then to create one.  The emerging geography of the future requires us actively to common spaces in our factories and offices. 

Knowledge:  The commons grows without copyright, lighting your candle from mine does not diminish me or put my candle out.  As Thomas Jefferson said, “He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lites his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.”  Conversation and just talk, or rapping, was once the people’s Internet.  Common sense arises from the web of family and neighborhood relationships.  But we need a place to meet!  How about the school?  Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Semantics:  The gigantic Oxford English Dictionary has four to five pages on the word “common” beginning with this, “belonging equally to more than one.” We get some of our most powerful words from the commons, such as community, communal, commonage, commonality, commune, communion—with their social, political, and spiritual overtones and histories.  Etymologically, these words are the offspring, so to speak, of two Latin parents, com meaning together, and munis meaning some kind of obligation.

Of course we don’t need to stay with English and Latin.  In the Andes mountain range, for instance, the allyus is the key word; in Mexico the ejido was the key word. The word “commons” can be tricky, subject to double-talk or the forked tongue, as when it is used for its opposite, as in the privatized housing tract (gated community) or the privatized market (the mall) which will call themselves “the common” but which are actually based on exclusivity unless you possess the do re me!

Working class:  The Supreme Court has ruled against class action by women workers.  Let us, the entire working class, employed and unemployed, men and women, rise from our slumbers and show that we do not wait on the Supreme Court for permission to act as a class! 

Some say the precariate has replaced the proletariat.  This simply means that life for us, the common people, has become more insecure, more uncertain, and more precarious.  Whether we are old or whether we are young, whether we are poor or getting by, the institutions that used to help us have disappeared and their names have become bad words, like “welfare” or “social security.”  As we have learned from our experiences of Katrina or the mortgage crisis, neither government nor corporations are able to abate the situation.  As the disasters accumulate we are left more and more to our own devices and find we must dig deeper.  The remembered commons of old as well as the spontaneous commons of now need to be available when need arises.  Who runs the workplaces anyway?

Being:  The commons refers neither to resources alone nor to people alone, but to an intermixture of them both.  The commons is not only “common pool resources” nor is the commons purely, “the people.”  In other words it is not a thing but a relationship. In medieval Europe the forests, the hills, the coasts, the estuaries were locations of commoners who were respectively foresters, shepherds, fishers, and reed people. The commoner was the person who commoned in such lands, and one parish to another parish intercommoned, and the bullying giants of legend, the lords and ladies, discommoned. In this struggle our landscapes were formed, even our human “nature,” as well as Nature herself.

Knowing:  Often you don’t know of the commons until it is taken away.  The neighborhood without sidewalks, the water fountain that has gone dry, the land that once your family could use, the fresh air that used to renew your spirit – gone!  They are taking liberties with what we took for granted.  No more!  Stop, thief!

Politics: The commons is outside the government.  Commons provides its own security.  Custom, or habit and socialization, rather than police force, regulate relations, as anyone knows who has organized a neighborhood soft-ball game or football in the street.  In English history politics began as a negotiation between lords and commoners. This is why there is a House of Lords and a House of Commons.

Law:  Generally custom, rather than law, safeguards and defines commons.  Custom is local, it is held in memory, and the elders are the keepers of community memory.  From Africa and Latin America we learn that this may be another guise of patriarchy and privilege.  Thus while we respect custom we do not romanticize it. 

Economy:  The commons is often outside of the realm of buying and selling or the realm of the commodity; it is where life is conducted face to face.  The commons is neither a gift economy nor potlatch.  No, not everything is free, but yes, everything may be shared.  It is a place of reciporicities.  This economy is not grounded in those triplets of evil named by Dr. Martin Luther King, jr., namely, militarism, racism, and consumerism.  The Industrial Revolution was neither. Quite the contrary.  In England mechanization was actually counter-revolutionary and what it produced, besides soot and grime, was the opposite of industry:  misery for workers and idleness for the rulers.  Talk about oxymorons!

History:  The commons is old and it is all over, from Iraq to Indiana, from Afghanistan to Arizona. It is associated with indigenous people and it has many recent modifications.

History is not a story of simple progress along a straight line of stages or up the rungs of a ladder. There have been many stages, overlapping, returning, leap-frogging, if never actually disappearing.  Beneath the radar there have been many communities, commoning along.  Besides, progress for whom? 

Religion: The good Samaritan, the principle of all things in common.  The Franciscans say juri divino omni sunt communia, or by divine law all things are common.  The Christian New Testament reports that the early Christians held all things in common. Marie Chauvet, the Haitian novelist and observer of voudou, writes, “Someone touched the calabash tree, my Lord God! … someone touched the calabash tree … someone touched the calabash tree….  You cut down all the trees, and the earth is no longer protected.  Look, she’s going away and shows you her teeth in revenge.”

Poets and Writers:  Our poets and theorists, our revolutionaries and reformers, have dreamt of it. Henry David Thoreau, Walt Whitman, Maya Angelou, Thomas Paine, Karl Marx, Peter Kropotkin, Claude McKay, Tom McGrath, Marge Piercy… oh, the list goes on and on, from the mystics to the romantics to the transcendentalists, from the democrats to the anarchists, from the socialists to the communitarians, from the wobblies to the reds, from the folkies to the rockers.

England:  Some associate the commons with England’s so-called ‘green and pleasant land’ and are apt to quote the following as an ancient bit of wisdom.

The law locks up the man or woman

Who steals the goose from off the common

But lets the greater villain loose

Who steals the common from the goose.

True enough, certainly prisons and the loss of the commons went together in English history, though it was an Irishman who composed this bit of wit.  Who are the geese in today’s world?  In England at the time of the enclosures of commons and prison construction in the 1790s, the Romantic Revolt poured out a huge expression‎ of opposition.  Samuel Coleridge writing at the time gave us a few spiritual lines which we can quote as a take away.

Return, pure Faith!  Return, meek piety!

The kingdoms of the world are yours:  each heart

Self-governed, the vast Family of Love

Rais’d from the common earth by common toil,

Enjoy the equal produce …

- See more at: http://onthecommons.org/magazine/stop-thief#sthash.UOz1e64s.dpuf

Review: "Stop, Thief": The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance

by David Bollier, originally published by David Bollier blog  | APR 4, 2014

It is always refreshing to read Peter Linebaugh’s writings on the commons because he brings such rich historical perspectives to bear, revealing the commons as both strangely alien and utterly familiar. With the added kick that the commoning he describes actually happened, Linebaugh’s journeys into the commons leave readers outraged at enclosures of long ago and inspired to protect today's endangered commons. 

This was my response, in any case, after reading Linebaugh’s latest book, Stop, Thief!  The Commons, Enclosures and Resistance(Spectre/PM Press), which is a collection of fifteen chapters on many different aspects of the commons, mostly from history.  The book starts out on a contemporary note by introducing “some principles of the commons” followed by “a primer on the commons and commoning” and a chapter on urban commoning.  For readers new to Linebaugh, he is an historian at the University of Toledo, in Ohio, and the author of such memorable books as The Magna Carta Manifesto and The London Hanged. 

Stop, Thief! is organized around a series of thematic sections that collect previously published essays and writings by Linebaugh.  One section focuses on Karl Marx (“Charles Marks,” as he was recorded in British census records) and another on British enclosures and commoners (Luddites; William Morris; the Magna Carta; “enclosures from the bottom up”).  A third section focuses on American commons (Thomas Paine; communism and commons) before concluding with three chapters on First Nations and commons.

This sampler reflects Linebaugh’s eclectic passions as a historian.  They are united by the overarching themes of commoning, enclosure and resistance, as the subtitle puts it. This framework makes for some unanticipated historical excursions, such as the chapter on the theft of forest products and abolition of forest rights in 19th century Germany, which made quite an impression on Karl Marx.  Another chapter – Linebaugh’s foreword to E.P. Thompson’s book on William Morris – situates Morris as a communist, artist, prophet and revolutionary. 

Some of the historical explorations journey into areas that are frankly obscure to me, so I don't always appreciate the fuller context and circumstances.  But this is part of the pleasure and fun -- to be introduced to new areas of commons history.  Linebaugh describes a host of historical commons that have receded into the mists of history:

“the Irish knowledge commons, the agrarian commons of the Nile, the open fields of England enclosed by Acts of Parliament, the Mississippi Delta commons, the Creek-Chickasaw-Cherokee commons, thellaneros and pardos of Venezeula, the Mexican communidades de los naturales, the eloquently expressed nut-and-berry commons of the Great Lakes, the customs of the sikep villagers of Java, the subsistence commons of Welsh gardeners, the commons of the street along the urban waterfront, the lascars crammed in dark spaces far from home, and the Guyanese slaves building commons and community….”

I only wish that some of these passing references had been elaborated upon; they conjure up exotic lost worlds unto themselves. 

It is fitting that the concluding chapter explores the “invisibility of the commons” – our problem now, as then.  Linebaugh notes how such astute minds as George Orwell, William Wordsworth and C.L.R. James failed to see the commons as commons in their times.  Since then, scholarship has helped to illuminate the importance of customary rights, of grazing commons, and of indigenous commons, notes Linebaugh.  “What is gained from seeing them as commoning?” he asks.  “An answer arises in the universality of expropriation, and a remedy to these crimes must be found therefore in reparation for what has been lost and taken.”

About David Bollier:  

David Bollier is an author, activist and independent scholar of the commons. He is Co-Founder of the Commons Strategies Group, a consulting project that works to promote the commons internationally.

http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-04-04/review-stop-thief-the-commons-enclosures-and-resistance

Some Principles of the Commons

The commons is invisible until lost, but it may be recovered by entering into it.

| by Peter Linebaugh

Commons Strategies

 

 

    

Photo by MarcelGermain from Flickr, under a Creative Commons license (Attribution, NonCommercial, No Derivatives).

Human solidarity as expressed in the slogan “all for one and one for all” is the foundation of commoning. In capitalist society this principle is permitted in childhood games or in military combat. Otherwise, when it is not honored in hypocrisy, it appears in the struggle contra capitalism or, as Rebecca Solnit shows, in the disasters of fire, flood, or earthquake.

The activity of commoning is conducted through labor with other resources; it does not make a division between “labor” and “natural resources.” On the contrary, it is labor which creates something as a resource, and it is by resources that the collectivity of labor comes to pass. As an action it is thus best understood as a verb rather than as a “common pool resource.” Both Lovelock’s ‘Gaia Hypothesis’ and the environmentalism of Rachel Carson were attempts to restore this perspective.

Commoning is primary to human life. Scholars used to write of ‘primitive communism’. ‘The primary commons’ renders the experience more clearly. Scarcely a society has existed on the face of the earth which has not had at its heart the commons; the commodity with its individualism and privatization was strictly confined to the margins of the community where severe regulations punished violators.

Commoning begins in the family. The kitchen where production and reproduction meet, and the energies of the day between genders and between generations are negotiated. The momentous decisions in the sharing of tasks, in the distribution of product, in the creation of desire, and in sustaining health are first made here.

Commoning is historic. The ‘village commons’ of English heritage or the ‘French commune’ of the revolutionary past are remnants from this history, reminding us that despite stages of destruction parts have survived, though often in distorted fashion as in welfare systems, or even as their opposite as in the realtor’s gated community or the retailer’s mall.

Commoning has always had a spiritual significance expressed as sharing a meal or a drink, in archaic uses derived from monastic practices, in recognition of the sacred habitus. Theophany, or the appearance of the divine principle, is apprehended in the physical world and its creatures. In north America (“turtle island”) this principle is maintained by indigenous people.

Commons is antithetical to capital. Commmoners are quarrelsome (no doubt), yet the commons is without class struggle. To be sure, capital can arise from the commons, as part is sequestrated off and used against the rest. This begins with inegalitarian relations, among the Have Lesses and the Have Mores. The means of production become the way of destruction, and expropriation leads to exploitation, the Haves and Have Nots. Capital derides commoning by ideological uses of philosophy, logic, and economics which say the commons is impossible or tragic. The figures of speech in these arguments depend on fantasies of destruction — the desert, the life-boat, the prison. They always assume as axiomatic that concept expressive of capital’s bid for eternity, the a-historical ‘Human Nature.’

Communal values must be taught, and renewed, continuously. The ancient court leet resolved quarrels of over-use; the panchayat in India did the same, like the way a factory grievance committee is supposed to be; the jury of peers is a vestigial remnant which determines what a crime is as well as who’s a criminal. The “neighbor” must be put back into the “hood,” as they say in Detroit, like the people’s assemblies in Oaxaca.

Commoning has always been local. It depends on custom, memory, and oral transmission for the maintenance of its norms rather than law, police, and media. Closely associated with this is the independence of the commons from government or state authority. The centralized state was built upon it. It is, as it were, ‘the pre-existing condition.’ Therefore, commoning is not the same as the communism of the USSR.

The commons is invisible until it is lost. Water, air, earth, fire — these were the historic substances of subsistence. They were the archaic physics upon which metaphysics was built. Even after land began to be commodified during English Middle Ages it was written,

But to buy water or wind or wit or fire the fourth, These four the Father of Heaven formed for this earth in common; These are Truth’s treasures to help true folk

We distinguish ‘the common’ from ‘the public’. We understand the public in contrast to the private, and we understand common solidarity in contrast to individual egotism. The commons has always been an element in human production even when capitalism acquired the hoard or laid down the law. The boss might ‘mean business’ but nothing gets done without respect. Otherwise, sabotage and the shoddy result.

Commoning is exclusive inasmuch as it requires participation. It must be entered into. Whether on the high pastures for the flock or the light of the computer screen for the data, the wealth of knowledge, or the real good of hand and brain, requires the posture and attitude of working alongside, shoulder to shoulder. This is why we speak neither of rights nor obligations separately.

Human thought cannot flourish without the intercourse of the commons. Hence, the first amendment linking the rights of speech, assembly, and petition. A moment’s thought reveals the interaction among these three activities which proceed from lonely muttering to poetic eloquence to world changing, or

Bing! Bing! the light bulb of an idea
_Buzz! Buzz! talking it over with neighbors or co-workers
Pow! Pow! telling truth to power.

TAGS

Peter Linebaugh

Posted January 11, 2010

- See more at: http://onthecommons.org/some-principles-commons#sthash.dVpqMqRK.dpuf