Re: Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review 2018

[문형철]

beyond reason

Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review

Rout George Kerrya,1

, 

Jayanta Kumar Patrab,1

, 

Sushanto Goudac

, 

Yooheon Parkb

, 

Han-Seung Shind

, 

Gitishree Dasb,∗,Correspondence information about the author Gitishree DasEmail the author Gitishree Das

Open AccessBenefaction of probiotics for human health: A review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.002

 | 

Article Info

• Abstract

• Full Text

• Images
• References

Article Outline

1. 1. Introduction
2. 2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics
   1. 2.1. Postbiotics
   2. 2.2. Prebiotics
   3. 2.3. Synbiotics
3. 3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications
   1. 3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics
   2. 3.2. Urogenital health care
   3. 3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics
   4. 3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics
   5. 3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics
   6. 3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics
   7. 3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics
   8. 3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics
   9. 3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS
4. 4. Commercial significance of probiotics
5. 5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics
6. 6. Conclusion
7. Author's contribution
8. Conflict of interest
9. References

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

Highlights

• •

  Probiotics possess important functional attribute for basic nutritional requirement.

• •

  These have shown positive responses to clinical treatment against several diseases.

• •

  Contribution of probiotics in diabetes, obesity, cancer is advancing research arena.

• •

  Eval‎uation of new strains of probiotics and applicability in biomedical research.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

Abstract

Humans are a unique reservoir of heterogeneous and vivacious group of microbes, which together forms the human-microbiome superorganism. Human gut serves as a home to over 100–1000 microbial species, which primarily modulate the host internal environment and thereby, play a major role in host health. This spectacular symbiotic relationship has attracted extensive research in this field. More specifically, these organisms play key roles in defense function, eupepsia along with catabolism and anabolism, and impact brain-gut responses. The emergence of microbiota with resistance and tolerance to existing conventional drugs and antibiotics has decreased the drug efficacies. Furthermore, the modern biotechnology mediated nano-encapsulated multiplex supplements appear to be high cost and inconvenient. Henceforth, a simple, low-cost, receptive and intrinsic approach to achieve health benefits is vital in the present era. Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics has shown promising results against various enteric pathogens due to their unique ability to compete with pathogenic microbiota for adhesion sites, to alienate pathogens or to stimulate, modulate and regulate the host's immune response by initiating the activation of specific genes in and outside the host intestinal tract. Probiotics have also been shown to regulate fat storage and stimulate intestinal angiogenesis. Hence, this study aims to underline the possible beneficial impact of probiotics for human health and medical sectors and for better lifestyle.

Graphical abstract

View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

프로바이오틱스 -  혈관신생,  항균 활성, 비뇨생식기 건강

프리바이오틱스 - 당뇨치료, 항알러지, 항암 활성

 synbiotics - 뇌, 신경에서 프로바이오틱스 효과, 혈압낮춤, 콜레스테롤 정상화

포스트바이오틱스 - 항염증, 비타민  b, k합성, 락토스 대사와 음식소화, 면역반응과 기생충감염을 방어

Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review

Rout George Kerrya,1, Jayanta Kumar Patrab,1, Sushanto Goudac, Yooheon Parkb, Han-Seung Shind, Gitishree Dasb,∗,Correspondence information about the author Gitishree DasEmail the author Gitishree Das

Open AccessBenefaction of probiotics for human health: A review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.002 | 

Article Info

Abstract

Full Text

ImagesReferences

Article Outline

1. Introduction

2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics

2.1. Postbiotics

2.2. Prebiotics

2.3. Synbiotics

3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications

3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics

3.2. Urogenital health care

3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics

3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics

3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics

3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics

3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics

3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics

3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS

4. Commercial significance of probiotics

5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics

6. Conclusion

Author's contribution

Conflict of interest

References

Highlights

•Probiotics possess important functional attribute for basic nutritional requirement.

•These have shown positive responses to clinical treatment against several diseases.

•Contribution of probiotics in diabetes, obesity, cancer is advancing research arena.

•Eval‎uation of new strains of probiotics and applicability in biomedical research.

Abstract

Humans are a unique reservoir of heterogeneous and vivacious group of microbes, which together forms the human-microbiome superorganism. Human gut serves as a home to over 100–1000 microbial species, which primarily modulate the host internal environment and thereby, play a major role in host health. This spectacular symbiotic relationship has attracted extensive research in this field. More specifically, these organisms play key roles in defense function, eupepsia along with catabolism and anabolism, and impact brain-gut responses. The emergence of microbiota with resistance and tolerance to existing conventional drugs and antibiotics has decreased the drug efficacies. Furthermore, the modern biotechnology mediated nano-encapsulated multiplex supplements appear to be high cost and inconvenient. Henceforth, a simple, low-cost, receptive and intrinsic approach to achieve health benefits is vital in the present era. Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics has shown promising results against various enteric pathogens due to their unique ability to compete with pathogenic microbiota for adhesion sites, to alienate pathogens or to stimulate, modulate and regulate the host's immune response by initiating the activation of specific genes in and outside the host intestinal tract. Probiotics have also been shown to regulate fat storage and stimulate intestinal angiogenesis. Hence, this study aims to underline the possible beneficial impact of probiotics for human health and medical sectors and for better lifestyle.

Graphical abstract



View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

Keywords:

Microbiota, Human-gut, Pathogenic, Probiotics, Symbiotic relationship

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

1. Introduction

Probiotic is a phrase of the modern era, denotation “for life” and is in use to name bacterial association with beneficial effects on human and animal health [1]. In early nineties, Metchnikoff [2] expressed probiotics in a scientific context as modification of floral/microbial diversity in human bodies and replaces the harmful microbes with useful ones. However, the breakthrough was achieved through the works of Henry Tissier, who observed that the microbial concentration of a particular type of bacteria in stool samples of infected diarrhea childrens were significantly lower in comparision to healthy children [3]. His suggestions for oral administration of live organisms (bifidobacteria) to patients with diarrhea (infantile diarrhea) and help restore a healthy gut flora was a first of it kind. The modern definition of probiotic was put forward by Havenaar and Huisint Veld [4] as a viable mono or mixed culture of bacteria which, when applied to animal or man, affects the host beneficially by improving the properties of the indigenous flora.

Following initial hiccups, research in probiotic has progressed considerably in the past two decades and significant advances have been made in the selection and characterization of specific probiotic cultures along with substantial health benefits upon consumption. An ecological consideration of the gut flora is necessary to understand their relevance in human health, as well as the probiotic food concept. Each individual has a unique signature of more than 100–1000 microbial species in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [5]. Bacterial cells comprise half of the wet weight of colonic material and their numbers exceed by 10-fold the number of tissue cells forming the human body. Normally, the stomach contains 103 different bacterial species, and the total microbial population of the colon comprises of about 1011–1012 cfu/g [6]. Bacterial colonization of the gut begins at birth when newborns are first exposed to a non-sterile environment. Henceforth, it evolves and transforms over a lifetime, depending on a complex and dynamic interplay between the diet, genome, and lifestyle of the host, as well as antibiotic use. Notable age-specific compositional shifts reported in gut microbiota composition include a decrease in the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio and a marked decrease in bifidobacteria in people aged > 60 years, around the time that the immune system starts to decline [7]. Generally, however, the composition of the core intestinal microflora is considered to be essentially stable throughout adulthood.

The beneficial usage of intestinal microflora, also referred to as “colonization resistance” or the “barrier effect” is an important mechanism used by the indigenous (autochthonous) gut bacteria to maintain their presence and confer niche protection against freshly ingested microorganisms, including pathogens [8, 9]. Therefore, it could be assumed that manipulation of the gut microflora to increase the relative numbers of “beneficial bacteria”, which have certain impacts on immune function, digestion, metabolism, and brain-gut communication [10]. Any alterations in their diversity may result in several disorders and diseases, for which conventional medicines provide very limited efficacy mainly due to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant and tolerant pathogenic microbes [11]. Attempts to overcome such critical issue by increasing the drug delivery system to the target sites using nano-encapsulated multiplex supplements have been reported to as a possible solution [12], although, such approaches appear to be cost-effective, and inconvenient for common use. Hence, a simple, low-cost, receptive and intrinsic means to improve host health has become a critical issue in the present era. In this context, probiotics tends to serve as supplement to the host microflora and provide protection against various enteric pathogens. Probiotics are also known to demonstrate promising results like improved gut barrier function; adding to their unique ability to compete with pathogenic microbiota for adhesion to the gut and improve their colonization [13].

Probiotics also stimulate, modulate and regulate the host's immune response by initiating the activation of specific genes of localized host cells. They even modulate the gastrointestinal hormone release and regulate brain behavior through bidirectional neuronal signaling, as part of the gut–brain axis [14]. Probiotics plays a significant role in inducing intestinal angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling that, in turn, regulates acute and chronic inflammation in intestinal mucosal tissue caused by the progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [15, 16]. Probiotics have physiological functions that contribute to the health of the host environment regulating microbes and are also helpful in combating overweight and obesity [17]. Although probiotics have considerable potential in nutritional and clinical applications, considerable researches are required for the implementation of probiotics into human health, nutrition and regulation of different abnormalities. The review is an attempt to emphasize the possible benefaction of probiotics for improving human health, nutrition optimization and regulation of common metabolic disorders or abnormalities.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics

There have been several definitions that had been prostulated for probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, however they can be best explain as microbe or a group of microbes that inhabits within the gut and nourishes the host body internally [18, 19]. They are commonly consumed as preparations with active live cultures and contain bacteria, such as lactobacilli, lactococci or bifidobacteria that has been isolated from natural environments [20].

As known that, the diverse characteristics of probiotics have been recognized as key health promoters, researches in recent years has mainly focused on investigating the culture conditions and viability of probiotic strains during processing and storage; sensitivity to low pH values, gastric fluid, bile, pancreatic and intestinal fluids and intestinal or respiratory mucus; adherence to isolated cells or cell cultures and interactions with other (pathogenic) microorganisms. A selective list of different bacterial species that are actively used as probiotics is listed in Table 1.

Table 1Current microorganisms used as probiotics.

Sl. No.	Probiotic bacterial genera	Species involved	References
1	Lactobacillus	L. plantarum, L. paracasei, L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. reuteri, L. bulgaricus	[97]
2	Propionibacterium	P. jensenii, P. freudenreichii
3	Peptostreptococcus	P. productus
4	Bacillus	B. coagulans, B. subtilis, B. laterosporus	[98]
5	Lactococcus	L. lactis, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus, L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. curvatus, L. plantarum	[99]
6	Enterococcus	E. faecium	[100]
7	Pediococcus	P. acidilactici, P. pentosaceus	[101]
8	Streptococcus	S. sanguis, S. oralis, S. mitis, S. thermophilus, S. salivarius	[102]
9	Bifidobacterium	B. longum, B. catenulatum, B. breve, B. animalis, B. bifidum	[103]
10	Bacteroides	B. uniformis	[17]
11	Akkermansia	A. muciniphila
B	Saccharomyces	S. boulardii	[16]

View Table in HTML

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

2.1. Postbiotics

Recent data suggests that bacterial products, in the absence of viable organisms, may have similar effects on signaling pathways and barrier function. These bacterial products are broadly characterized as postbiotics and can be defined as non-viable bacterial products or metabolic byproducts from probiotic microorganisms that have biologic activity in the host [21]. General, postbiotics include bacterial metabolic byproducts, such as bacteriocins, organic acids, ethanol, diacetyl, acetaldehydes and hydrogen peroxide, but it is also found that certain heat-killed probiotics can also retain important bacterial structures that may exert biological activity in the host [22]. Research shows that these metabolic products have a broad inhibitory property toward pathogenic microbes and, therefore, can be used as an alternative to antibiotics [23]. Postbiotics are non-toxic, non-pathogenic and resistance to hydrolysis by mammalian enzymes, as these are non-viable bacterial products or metabolic byproducts from probiotics. In some instances, postbiotics can also enhance barrier function against species like Saccharomyces boulardii, and improve angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in epithelial cells by activation of α2β1 integrin collagen receptors [24]. Similar properties have also been identified in several other probiotic species of Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bacteroides fragilis, Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [25] (Table 2).

Table 2Postbiotics and prebiotics and their natural sources.

Bioactive compounds	Natural sources	References
Postbiotics
Bacteriocins	Lactobacillus plantarum I-UL4	[23]
Heat-killed LGG	Lactobacillus rhamnosus	[22]
Soluble mediator	Lactobacillus paracasei	[104]
Butyrate	Faecalibacterium prausnitzii	[24]
Polyphosphate	Lactobacillus brevis	[105]
Exopolysaccharides	Lactobacillus pentosus	[101]
Short-chain fatty acids	Lactobacillus gasser	[106]
Prebiotics
Fructo-oligosaccharides	Onion, Leek, Asparagus, Chicory, Jerusalem artichoke, Garlic, Wheat, Oat	[107]
Inulin	Agave, Banana/Plantain, Burdock Camas, Chicory, Coneflower, Costus, Dandelion, Elecampane, Garlic, Globe artichoke, Jerusalem artichoke, Jicama, Leopard's bane, Mugwort root, Onion, Wild yam, Yacón	[6]
Isomalto-oligosaccharides	Miso, Soy, Sauce, Sake, Honey	[108]
Lactulose	Skim milk	[109]
Lactosucrose	Milk sugar	[110]
Galacto-oligosaccharides	Lentil, Human milk, Chickpea/hummus, Green pea, Lima bean, Kidney bean	[111]
Soybean oligosaccharides	Soybean	[112]
Xylo-oligosaccharides	Bamboo shoot, Fruits, Vegetables, Milk, Honey	[113]
Fructo-oligosaccharides	Onion, Chicory, Garlic, Asparagus, Banana, Artichoke	[114]
Arabinoxylan	Bran of grasses	[44]
Arabinoxylan oligosaccharides	Cereals
Resistant starch-1,2,3,4	Beans/legumes, Starchy fruits and vegetables (e.g. bananas), Whole grains	[115]

View Table in HTML

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

2.2. Prebiotics

Further exploration of probiotics have led to the development of prebiotics, which are certain nutrients that modify the gut microbial flora although not easily digested by humans but have a selective role in stimulation of growth or activity of beneficial bacterial species in the gut [26, 27]. Some of the common known prebiotics includes bifidogenic properties of insulin, oligofructose, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) synthetically produced from sucrose, as well as galactose-containing and xylose-containing oligosaccharides [28, 29]. The fermentation of carbohydrates represents a major source of energy for epithelial cells in the colon and prebiotics can readily fulfill these requirements as a result of their fermentation by gut microbiota, such as bifidobacteria. Besides bifidobacteria, there are several other gut microorganisms that play a significant role in fermenting these non-digestible oligosaccharides. Some of the examples of the prebiotics, along with their natural sources and the associated fermentative microbiota are presented in Table 2.

Prebiotics can be obtained naturally from sources like vegetables, fruits, and grains consumed in our daily life. Prebiotics not only serve as an energy source but also have several health benefits such as reducing the preval‎ence and duration of diarrhea, providing relief from inflammation and other symptoms associated with intestinal bowel disorders, and exerting protective effects to prevent colon cancer [30]. Prebiotics are also implicated in enhancing the bioavailability and uptake of minerals, lowering of some risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and promoting satiety and weight loss [31]. Despite their vast nutritional and medicinal benefits, research regarding screening new versatile prebiotics is scarce. Therefore, more research should be focused on identifying new health supplements, where screening novel prebiotics must be a primary concern.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

2.3. Synbiotics

Development in microbial research has led to formation of synbiotics which is a fusion of probiotics and prebiotics products and helps in enhancing the survival and the implantation of live microbial dietary supplements in the gut [18, 32]. The synergistic benefits are more efficiently promoted when both the probiotic and prebiotic work together in the living system. There is mounting scientific evidence that the symbiotic relationship between prebiotics and probiotics contributes significantly to health. Commercial interest in functional foods containing synbiotics has consistently increased due to the awareness of the benefits for gut health, disease prevention and therapy. Research in this area is currently focused on developing new health-promoting foods, as well as on selecting new cultures demonstrating an enhanced ability to colonize the human gut, along with their ability to digest new forms of prebiotics. Some of the common synbiotic compositions currently under study are shown in Table 3.

Table 3Common synbiotics and their microbial sources.

Synbiotics		References
Prebiotics	Probiotics
Fructo-oligosaccharides	Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcaceae, Klebsiellae	[116]
Inulin	Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus paracasei	[97]
Isomalto-oligosaccharides	Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides fragilis group	[108]
Lactulose	Bifidobacteria lactis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus	[109]
Lactosucrose	Zymomonas mobilis	[117]
Xylo-oligosaccharides	Bifidobacterium adolescentis, L. plantarum	[113]
Galacto-oligosaccharides	Bifidobacterium longum, B. catenulatum	[118]
Fructo-oligosaccharides	Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. lactis	[119]
Arabinoxylan and Arabinoxylan oligosaccharides	Bifidobacterium sp.	[44]
Resistant starch-1,2,3,4	Bacteroides, Eubacterium rectal	[120]

View Table in HTML

Conventional trials and investigation has shown that the various beneficiary effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are much more effective than their unitary use known till date. Therefore, studies aimed at developing new concoctions of probiotics and prebiotics are vital to exploit further possibilities of enhancing nutritional and clinical health benefits (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Different sources of probiotics.

View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications

The use of probiotics for clinical health benefits is a fascinating area of research that the present era has yet to explore. Some of the elite properties of probiotics, such as anti-pathogenicity, anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-allergic, and angiogenic activities and their effect on the brain and central nervous system (CNS) are briefly discussed below and also depicted in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Applications of probiotics and their mode of action.

View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics

Anti-pathogenic activity is regarded as one of the most beneficial effects of probiotics because unlike classic antibiotics, disturbance or alteration in the composition of the complex population of the gut microbiota is inhibited. There has been considerable research on the anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics or a probiotic mixture. Tejero-Sarinena et al. [33] investigated the influence of probiotics on the survival of Salmonella enterica, Serovar typhimurium and Clostridium difficile in an in vitro model and postulated that probiotics inhibit pathogens by the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetic, propionic, butyric and lactic acids. SCFAs help to maintain an appropriate pH in the colonic lumen, which is imperative in the expression‎ of numerous bacterial enzymes and in metabolism of foreign compounds and carcinogens in the gut [34]. Islam [22] also suggested that a wide variety of anti-pathogenic compounds, like bacteriocins, ethanol, organic acids, diacetyl, acetaldehydes, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peptides are produced by many probiotics. Among these compounds, peptides and bacteriocins, in particular are mostly involved in increasing the membrane permeability of the target cells, which leads to the depolarization of the membrane potential and, ultimately, cell death [35]. Similarly, the production of H2O2 by these bacterial groups causes the oxidation of sulfhydryl groups, resulting in the denaturation of several enzymes results in the peroxidation of membrane lipids, thus, increasing membrane permeability of the pathogenic microorganism and consequently, cell death [36]. Some of these compounds may act by lowering pH by organic acids like lactic and acetic acids [34]. In addition to producing anti-pathogenic bioactive compounds that directly affect pathogens, probiotics also stimulate host anti-pathogenic defense pathways, such as stimulating or activating the pathway involved in the production of defensins that are cationic anti-microbial peptides produced in several cell types including Paneth cells in the crypts of the small intestine and intestinal epithelial cells [37]. Another mechanism by which probiotics exert anti-pathogenic activity is by competing for pathogen binding and receptor sites, as well as for available nutrients and growth.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.2. Urogenital health care

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP), more than one billion women around the world suffer from non-sexually transmitted urogenital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV), urinary tract infection (UTI) and several other yeast infections [38]. The species typically associated with BV include Gardnerella vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis [39]. Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are also a significant cause of morbidity worldwide. The two most commonly documented bacterial STDs in some developed countries are gonorrhea and Chlamydia, which are caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeaeand Chlamydia trachomatis, respectively [40]. The major issue facing the current decade is that despite having sophisticated medicines to treat various medical conditions, these pathogenic microbes, among others, are concurrently becoming resistance to the present medicines. Therefore, instead of developing new medicines, our present focus should be on developing new live supplements, like non-pathogenic microbes that act against the pathogens.

It is well-known that there is an association between abnormal vaginal microbial flora and an increased incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI). There are about 50 different species inhabiting the vagina, like Lactobacillus species, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus vaginalis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus that are regarded as the main regulators of the vaginal micro-environment. Imbalance in the microbial composition greatly influences the health of the vaginal microenvironment, potentially leading to compromised state of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and UTI. These compromised states can be reassured by balancing the number of Lactobacillus sp. via the supplementation of probiotics [38].

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) of Southeast Asia, 425 million people have diabetes worldwide including 78 million people in the Southeast Asian region [41]. Moreover, this number is expected to rise to 629 million by 2045 if nothing is done [41]. The management of this disorder includes multiple medications although there is no definitive cure for diabetes. Nonetheless, bimolecular and pharmacological researchers have made progress in understanding the importance of synbiotics in curing the disorder [42]. Based on large-scale 16 S rRNA gene sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR and fluorescent in situhybridization, the connection between the composition of the intestinal microbiota and metabolic diseases, like obesity and diabetes, has been postulated by Larsen et al. [43]. Consequently, enhancing the beneficial microbiota by the use of probiotics is expected to play a significant role in neutralization of the disorder [43].

Gram-negative bacteroidetes and the Gram-positive firmicutes are two specific bacterial phyla that dominant the gut microenvironment. Recent research has proven that obesity is associated with increased bacteroidetes over time, concurrent with a reduction in firmicutes [44, 17]. More specifically, patients with type-2 diabetes have significantly reduced numbers of firmicutes species, such that the bacteroidetes/firmicutes ratio has increased, which positively correlates with plasma glucose concentration [45]. A similar pattern has been implicated in the development of auto-immune diseases, such as type-1 diabetes [46, 47, 48]. Alterations in the microbiome also increase invasion of opportunistic pathogens, which are resistant to oxidative stress and simultaneously capable of reducing sulfates and inhibiting the growth of butyrate-producing bacteria [49].

Management of type-2 diabetes by modulating gut hormones, such as gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1, via probiotic and prebiotic interventions is another convincing strategy. In this context, hormones play an implicated role in glucose homeostasis, which results in neutralizing the disorder caused by peripheral insulin resistance or failure of β-cells to produce insulin [50]. Currently, research is focused on generating new prebiotics, such as arabinoxylan and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides, which show promising results in counteracting related metabolic disorders, because both carbohydrates have been linked to adiposity reduction.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics

Abnormal or excessive fat (obesity) accumulation that directly impairs health is linked to an increase in energy availability, sedentariness and a greater control of ambient temperature, leading to an imbalance in energy intake and expenditure [17]. It has been evident that transplantation of the intestinal microflora from obese mice into germ-free mice could replicate the obese phenotype and may lead to more efficient at extracting energy from food and stimulating lipogenesis.

Probiotics possess physiological functions that contribute to the health of host environment regulating microbes. In most instances, weight loss is facilitated by thermogenic and lipolytic responses through stimulating the sympathetic nervous system [51]. Probiotic strains, Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 have shown properties of inhibiting the increase in adipocyte tissue that are the main source of leptin and adiponectin and thereby, limiting leptin secretion [52]. Other probiotic microbes such as L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilusand Bifidobacterium longum have also been reported to have hypocholesterolemic effects [51].

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are among the most chronic inflammatory diseases of the GIT and are collectively called IBD [42]. CD can affect any part of the GIT like the mucosa, submucosa, and serosa, and the inflammation can even spread to the whole GIT. In contrast, UC characteristically involves the large bowel; specifically the mucosa and submucosa of the colon [53]. Research has shown that an imbalance in the gut microbiota plays an important pathophysiological role in the positive regulation of IBD. It is also understood that the disorder could possibly be altered by supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics [54, 55, 56]. IBD is being associated with impaired production of SCFAs, particularly, acetate, butyrate, and propionate. Moreover, these SCFAs have been known to play a key role in maintaining colonic homeostasis. They also possess anti-inflammatory effects and improve the propulsive colonic function [57]. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that supplementation with indigestible carbohydrates and fiber (prebiotic) alone, or in combination with probiotics to increase the production of SCFAs could be useful therapeutic approaches. Presently, progress in the field is mostly concerned with developing genetically engineered probiotic bacterial strains that are able to produce and discharge immunomodulators, such as interleukin-10, trefoil factors (compact proteins co-expressed with mucins in the GIT), or lipoteichoic acid (a major constituent of the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria) that can impact the host immune system, resulting in the restoration of the level of protective commensal bacterial species [58]. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterobacter and E. coli are the most widely used probiotics in foods. Apart from these organisms, new or genetically modified should be developed to counteract IBD [59].

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics

As per WHO cancer fact sheet [60], cancer has been a dreadful disease affecting peoples all over the globe and approximately 14 million new cases and 8.2 million cancer-related deaths added till 2012. More than 70% of the global cancer deaths are from Asian, African, and American continents [61]. In the present decade, intense research on cancer involving genomics, proteomics, and molecular pathology, has enhanced the knowledge about cancer and public awareness. Concurrently, many new drugs using nanotechnology and biotechnology (nanocapsule) with fascinating properties of luminescent have been discovered but still tolerance to their burden and side effect has been a major limitation to it. Natural sources that confer anti-carcinogenic effects, such as probiotics have been receiving prime focus in recent years [62]. These have attracted intense interest from clinical nutritionists, scientists, and industrialists to work in a collaborative manner to bring down the disease and develop an effective drug with minimal or no side-effects [63, 64]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that probiotic strains, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB-5221 and -8829, have highly potent in suppressing colorectal cancer cells and promoting normal epithelial colon cell growth through the production of SCFAs (ferulic acid). This ability was also compared with other probiotics namely L. acidophilus ATCC 314 and L. rhamnosus ATCC 51303 both of which were previously characterized with–tumorigenic activity [65]. Again two different probiotic strains L. acidophilus LA102 and L. casei LC232 have also been found to show pronounced cytotoxic activities, with in vitro anti-proliferative activity against two colorectal cancer cell lines (Caco-2 and HRT-18) [66]. Though probiotics could play a significant role in neutralizing cancer, research is limited only to in vitro tests. Hence, the anti-cancer potential of probiotics must be proven in vivo models and proceed towards animal and clinical trials.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics

The increasing preval‎ence of allergic diseases caused by immune disorders is a serious economic and social burden worldwide. Comprehending the fundamental molecular mechanism that contributes to the etiology of allergic diseases, as well as new treatment approaches is vital for the follow-up and prevention of these diseases [67]. In recent times, the beneficial role of probiotics in protection and management of allergic diseases had advanced the understanding of their cause and prevention. In vitro studies of certain probiotics, such as Lactobacillus plantarum L67, have shown the potential to prevent allergy-associated disorders with the production of interleukin-12 and interferon-γ in their host [68]. In another study, L. plantarum 06CC2 significantly alleviated allergic symptoms and reduced the levels of total immunoglobulin E, ovalbumin-specific immunoglobulin E, and histamine in the sera of ovalbumin-sensitized mice. In spleen cells of the mice, L. plantarum 06CC2 is known to significantly enhance the secretions of interferon-γ and interleukin-4, which are responsible for alleviating allergic symptoms [69]. Further work may be helpful in eval‎uating the anti-allergic activity of probiotics and their mode of action.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics

Angiogenesis has been an important phenomenon and is necessary for wound healing process through delineated cellular responses to regenerate damaged tissues [70]. The angiogenic program consists of a deliberately orchestrated series of cellular events by which new vessels arise from pre-existing ones by promoting recruitment of inflammatory cells and producing cytokines, matrix-degrading enzymes, and chemokines. Deregulated angiogenesis has a prominent impact on major human diseases, such as cancer, diabetic retinopathy, and IBD including CD and UC [16, 71]. Non-pathogenic probiotic yeast, S. boulardii, has been reported to protect against intestinal injury and inflammation. The molecular mechanisms by which probiotics mediate these beneficial effects however remain unclear. The potential mechanisms of probiotics in angiogenesis process may include alteration of inflammatory cytokine profiles, down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cascades or induction of regulatory mechanisms in a strain-specific manner, epithelial barrier function enhancement, visceral hypersensitivity reduction, spinal afferent traffic, and stress response.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS

The colonization of microbiota in the GIT is well-associated with both GIT and gastrointestinal diseases. Moreover, in recent years, many studies have been devoted towards elucidating the influence of gut microbiota on the CNS. The “microbiota-gut-brain axis” is an interactive, bi-directional communication established by the exchange of regulatory signals between the GIT and CNS [72]. The effect of probiotics on the CNS has been mainly studied in clinical trials, where it has been evident that gut microbiota influence human brain development function [73]. In children with autism spectrum disorder, a daily dose of L. plantarum WCFS1 (4.5 × 1010 CFU/day) led to an improvement in their school records and attitude towards food [74]. Messaoudi et al. [75] discussed reduced psychological distress in a randomized trial involving healthy volunteers treated with oral administration of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and B. longum R0175. In another clinical trial, Rao et al. [76] showed a decrease in anxiety symptoms by administration of L. casei strain Shirota to patients suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome. However, despite an increase in the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterialevels, the bowel functions were not studied. Hence, it is feasible that the reduced anxiety was due to improved bowel function. Szajewska [77] reported that autism spectrum and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders in children could be prevented by L. rhamnosus administration to the mother at 4 weeks from expected delivery. It has been observed that many gut bacteria synthesize to neuroactive compounds similar to those produced in the host brain. Human intestinally derived strains of L. brevis DPC6108 and Bifidobacterium dentium were reported to produce large amounts of γ-aminobutyric acid, a brain neurotransmitter that helps humans to suppress anxiety and depression [46]. Doses of a multispecies probiotic containing L. brevis W, B. lactis W, L. acidophilus W37, Bifidobacterium bifidum W2, L. salivarius W2, L. casei W5, and Lactococcus lactis (W19 and W58) to healthy humans showed a significant overall reduction in the cognitive reactivity to sad mood [78]. However, probiotic trials involving patients suffering from anxiety and clinical depression are lacking and therefore require more time and work to validate this effect. Oral intake of L. acidophilus has been shown to assist people to regulate their mood towards rewards and addictive behavior [79].

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

4. Commercial significance of probiotics

Although probiotics are still in pipeline and requires further studies and development to overcome barriers related to their successful administration and minimal side effects several forms of probiotics are available commercially and are in use in large amount. Some of the common commercial microbial strains currently sold as probiotics and their sources are given in Table 4. The species in the following are listed as per manufacturer standards and amenities, which may not reflect the most current taxonomy.

Table 4Probiotics and their commercial sources.

Strain	Commercial products	Source
Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 (DR10) Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20)	Sold as ingredient	Danisco (Madison, WI)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii	Florastor	Biocodex (Creswell, OR)
Bifidobacterium infantis 35,264	Align	Procter and Gamble (Mason, OH)
Lactobacillus fermentum VRI003 (PCC)	Sold as ingredient	Probiomics (Eveleigh, Australia)
Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 Lactobacillus acidophilus R0052	Sold as ingredient	Institut Rosell (Montreal, Canada)
Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 Lactobacillus paracasei CRL 431	Sold as ingredient	Chr. Hansen (Milwaukee, WI)
Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12	Sold as ingredient	Chr. Hansen (Milwaukee, WI)
Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult	Yakult	Yakult (Tokyo, Japan)
Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 (“L. caseiImmunitas”) Bifidobacterium animalis DN173 010 (“Bifidis regularis”)	DanActive fermented milk Activia yogurt	Danone (Paris, France) Dannon (Tarrytown, NY)
Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1	Femdophilus	Chr. Hansens (Milwaukee, WI) Urex Biotech (London, Ontario, Canada) Jarrow Formulas (Los Angeles, CA)
Lactobacillus johnsonii Lj-1 (same as NCC533 and formerly Lactobacillus acidophilus La-1)	LC1	Nestlé (Lausanne, Switzerland)
Lactobacillus plantarum 299 V	Sold as ingredient; Good Belly juice product	Probi AB (Lund, Sweden); NextFoods (Boulder, Colorado)
Lactobacillus rhamnosus 271	Sold as ingredient	Probi AB (Lund, Sweden)
Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55,730 (“L. reuteriProtectis”)	BioGaia Probiotic chewable tablets or drops	Biogaia (Stockholm, Sweden)
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (“LGG”)	Culturelle; Dannon Danimals	Valio Dairy (Helsinki, Finland) The Dannon Company (Tarrytown, NY)
Lactobacillus rhamnosus LB21 Lactococcus lactis L1A	Sold as ingredient	Essum AB (Umeå, Sweden)
Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118	–	University College Cork (Cork, Ireland)
Bifidobacterium longum BB536	Sold as ingredient	Morinaga Milk Industry Co. Ltd. (Zama-City, Japan)
Lactobacillus acidophilus LB	Sold as ingredient	Lacteol Laboratory (Houdan, France)
Lactobacillus paracasei F19	Sold as ingredient	Medipharm (Des Moines, Iowa)
Lactobacillus paracasei 33 Lactobacillus rhamnosus GM-020 Lactobacillus paracasei GMNL-33	Sold as ingredient	GenMont Biotech (Taiwan)
Lactobacillus plantarum OM	Sold as ingredient	Bio-Energy Systems, Inc. (Kalispell, MT)
Bacillus coagulans BC30	Sustenex, Digestive Advantage and sold as ingredient	Ganeden Biotech Inc. (Cleveland, Ohio)
Streptococcus oralis KJ3 Streptococcus uberis KJ2 Streptococcus rattus JH145	ProBiora3 EvoraPlus	Oragenics Inc. (Alachua, FL)
Lactobacilli rhamnosus PBO1 Lactobacilli gasseri EB01	EcoVag	Bifodan (Denmark), www.ecovag.com

View Table in HTML

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics

Like probiotics, prebiotics is also being widely explored for their utility in the various field of applied science, more specifically as nutrients and supplements. But still than the novel research on the usability of prebiotics are scanty. Some of these cutting age research where the understandings of prebiotics have reached a milestone is as follows. Basically, “prebiotics are a collection of nutritionally enriched compounds grouped together with the efficiency to enhance and support the growth and sustenance of specific beneficial gut microflora” [80]. In general, it can be said that prebiotics is those compounds that are non-digestible and able to specifically modulate the sustenance of health-promoting gut bacteria.

Presently the knowledge on the complexity as well as the usability of these non-digestible compounds has increased to a greater extent because of the development of various ‘omic’ tools such as proteomics, genomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics etc. [81]. Thus the research based on the various mode of synthesis has become the current focus of the present era. The food industries of the present decade require simple, sustainable, cost-effective and high efficient methods for large-scale production and application. Naturally, prebiotic oligosaccharides could be obtained from food; otherwise, theses could also be synthesized chemically or enzymatically from disaccharides or other substrates as well as by hydrolysis of polysaccharides. Most of the prebiotics of natural origin have already been eval‎uated for their beneficiary role; therefore the current search is for other novel prebiotic oligosaccharides by various enzyme-based technologies. Enzymes (β-galactosidase, fructosyltransferase etc.) from various sources such as microbes and plants are being utilized for their synthesis [82, 83]. Moreover, enzymes are engineered to better regulate regioselectivity and the enhancement in the yield of reaction which further enhances the glycodiversification and the quality of the products attained [84, 85]. Again, the emergence of genetically engineered microorganisms further resulted in boosting the production of oligosaccharides (2′fucosyllactose) by fermentation process for large-scale industrial production [86].

Due to the tangible association of prebiotics oligosaccharides with the gut microbiome as well as maintenance and restoration of microbial homeostasis which is again keenly associated with positive health outcome of the host, researches regarding prebiotics are given much emphasis in the current era. Prebiotic compounds are food-grade substances from which beneficial short-chain fatty acid could be produced as a result of degradation by microbes such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli within the host further appeal for their utilization as nutrient supplements [87]. Their biomedical benefaction not only covers gastrointestinal system but also systems located away. Recent studies several rat models have demonstrated calcium absorption, retention bone density and strength is enhanced due to the intake of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) specifically [88]. Gut microbes influence the expression‎ of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor in the brain, prebiotics such as FOS and GOS is likely to exploit this connection to tune the brain-derived neurotrophic factors, d-serine, and other synaptic proteins such as synaptophysin and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit [89, 90]. It has also been found that prebiotics such as oligofructose, β-fructan, oligofructose/inulin mix have immunomodulatory benefits in the case of pathogenic attack, atopic dermatitis, allergic prevention, chronic inflammation and up-regulated responses against vaccinations [88, 91]. Benefactions of this non-digestible compound have also emerged for a variety of skin related-conditions. Improve water retention and prevention of erythema was observed in a hairless mice skin on GOS supplementation [92]. Studies also prove that skin's barrier properties are improved by the increased dermal expression‎ of cell adhesion and matrix formation markers CD44, and type 1 collagen on GOS treatment [88, 93]. Again, GOS alone or with B. breve is found to impede water and keratin depletion effectuated by phenolic compounds [94]. Likewise, currently, prebiotics are widely being explored for their usefulness in the treatment of various types of disorder and diseases [95, 96].

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

6. Conclusion

Probiotics possess important functional attributes that could fulfill most of our basic nutritional and clinical supplementation requirements. These microbes have shown positive responses to clinical treatment against several diseases and disorders, such as diarrhea associated with rotavirus, IBS and food allergies. Moreover, the contribution of probiotics in preventing and treatment of diabetes, obesity, cancer and diseases related to pathogenic microbes is an exciting and rapidly advancing research arena. Dietary probiotic supplementation generally involves dairy products but probiotics can also be incorporated into non-dairy fermented food products, presenting an alternative and more advantageous source in the process of eval‎uating new probiotic strains. Moreover, present clinical and nutritional eval‎uations have been successful in exposing some remarkable functions of particular probiotic strains. Specifically, regulation of energy in various catabolic and anabolic processes, acid and bile tolerance, ability to adhere to gut epithelial cells, to combat against pathogens, along with certain other properties, like their safety-enhancing property, serviceability as food and beneficial supplements for human health. Therefore, current focus is on eval‎uating new strains of probiotics and their applicability in biomedical/clinical research, paving a new direction for exploration and exploitation of probiotics aimed at improving human health.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

Author's contribution

RGK, JKP and SG collected literature, designed and wrote the manuscript. GD, HSS and JKP edited and revised the manuscript. All the author checked and approved the manuscript.

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

Conflict of interest

Author declares no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to the authorities of respective departments for support in doing this research. This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Eval‎uation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through the Agricultural Research Center Project and Agricultural Bio-Technology Development Program funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (710003-07-7-SB120, 116075-3).

Jump to Section1. Introduction2. Probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics  2.1. Postbiotics  2.2. Prebiotics  2.3. Synbiotics3. Clinical significance of probiotics and its potential applications  3.1. Anti-pathogenic activity of probiotics  3.2. Urogenital health care  3.3. Anti-diabetic activities of probiotics  3.4. Anti-obesity activity of probiotics  3.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotics  3.6. Anti-cancer activity of probiotics  3.7. Anti-allergic activity of probiotics  3.8. Angiogenic activity of probiotics  3.9. Effect of probiotics on brain and CNS4. Commercial significance of probiotics5. Recent advancements and utility prebiotics6. ConclusionAuthor's contributionConflict of interestReferences

References

1. Bagchi, T. Traditional food & modern lifestyle: impact of probiotics. Indian J Med Res. 2014; 140: 333–335
   • View in Article 
   • | PubMed
    | 
   • Google Scholar
2. in: E. Metchnikoff, P.C. Mitchell (Eds.) Essais optimistes. Heinemann, London; 1907
   • View in Article 
   | 
   • Google Scholar
3. Tissier, H. Tritement des infections intestinales par la methode de translormation de la flore bacterienne de lintestin. ([in French])C R Soc Biol. 1906; 60: 359–361
   • View in Article 
   | 
   • Google Scholar
4. Havenaar, R. and Huis in’t Veld, J.H.J. Probiotics: a general view. in: B.J.B. Wood (Ed.) The lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. Elsevier Applied Science, London; 1992: 151–170
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    | 
   • Google Scholar
5. Aziz, Q., Dore, J., Emmanuel, A., Guarners, F., and Quigley, E.M.M. Gut microbiota and gastrointestinal health: current concepts and future directions. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25: 4–15
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    
   • | PubMed
    
   • | Scopus (117)
    | 
   • Google Scholar
6. Slavin, J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients. 2013; 5: 1417–1435
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    
   • | PubMed
    
   • | Scopus (596)
    | 
   • Google Scholar
7. Lloyd-Price, J., Abu-Ali, G., and Huttenhower, C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8: 1–11
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    
   • | PubMed
    
   • | Scopus (297)
    | 
   • Google Scholar
8. Lewis, B.B., Buffie, C.G., Carter, R., Leiner, I., Toussaint, N.C., Miller, L. et al. Loss of microbiota-mediated colonization resistance to clostridium difficile infection is greater following oral vancomycin as compared with metronidazole. J Infect Dis. 2015; 212: 1656–1665
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    
   • | PubMed
    
   • | Scopus (74)
    | 
   • Google Scholar
9. Perez-Cobas, A.E., Moya, A., Gosalbes, M.J., and Latorre, A. Colonization resistance of the gut microbiota against clostridium difficile. Antibiotics. 2015; 4: 337–357
   • View in Article 
   • | Crossref
    
   • | Scopus (20)
    | 
   • Google Scholar
10. Scott, K.P., Antoine, J.-M., Midtvedt, T., and van Hemert, S. Manipulating the gut microbiota to maintain health and treat disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015; 26
    10.3402/mehd.v26.25877
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
11. Pamer, E.G. Resurrecting the intestinal microbiota to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Science. 2016; 352: 535–538
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (128)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
12. Qadir, M.I. Phage therapy: a modern tool to control bacterial infections. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015; 28: 265–270
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
13. Rao, S.C., Athalye-Jape, G.K., Deshpande, G.C., Simmer, K.N., and Patole, S.K. Probiotic supplementation and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016; 137: 1–16
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (64)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
14. Kristensen, N.B., Bryrup, T., Allin, K.H., Nielsen, T., Hansen, T.H., and Pedersen, O. Alterations in fecal microbiota composition by probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Genome Med. 2016; 8: 1–11
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (139)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
15. Bakirtzi, K., Law, I.K.M., Xue, X., Iliopoulos, D., Shah, Y.M., and Pothoulakis, C. Neurotensin promotes the development of colitis and intestinal angiogenesis via Hif-1α–miR-210 signaling. J Immunol. 2016;196: 4311–4321
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (14)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
16. Chen, X., Yang, G., Song, J.-H., Xu, H., Li, D., Goldsmith, J. et al. Probiotic yeast inhibits VEGFR signaling and angiogenesis in intestinal inflammation. PLoS One. 2013; 8: 1–7
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
17. Kobyliak, N., Conte, C., Cammarota, G., Haley, A.P., Styriak, I., Gaspar, L. et al. Probiotics in prevention and treatment of obesity: a critical view. Nutr Metab. 2016; 13: 1–13
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (77)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
18. Gibson, G.R. and Roberfroid, M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. 1995; 125: 1401–1412
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
19. Hamasalim, H.J. Synbiotic as feed additives relating to animal health and performance. Adv Microbiol. 2016; 6: 288–302
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
20. Bongaerts, G.P.A. and Severijnen, R.S.V.M. A reassessment of the PROPATRIA study and its implications for probiotic therapy. Nature Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 55–63
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (23)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
21. Patel, R.M. and Denning, P.W. Therapeutic use of prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis: what is the current evidence?. Clin Perinatol. 2013; 40: 11–25
    • View in Article 
    • | Abstract
     
    • | Full Text
     
    • | Full Text PDF
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (67)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
22. Islam, S.U. Clinical uses of probiotics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: 1–5
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (22)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
23. Ooi, M.F., Mazlan, N., Foo, H.L., Loh, T.C., Mohamad, R., Rahim, R.A. et al. Effects of carbon and nitrogen sources on bacteriocin-inhibitory activity of postbiotic metabolites produced by Lactobacillus plantarum I-UL4. Malays J Microbiol. 2015; 11: 176–184
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
24. Giorgetti, G.M., Brandimarte, G., Fabiocchi, F., Ricci, S., Flamini, P., Sandri, G. et al. Interactions between innate immunity, microbiota, and probiotics. J Immunol Res. 2015; 501361: 7
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
25. Cicenia, A., Scirocco, A., Carabotti, M., Pallotta, L., Marignani, M., and Severi, C. Postbiotic activities of lactobacilli-derived factors. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 48: S18–S22
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (31)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
26. Rastall, R.A. and Gibson, G.R. Recent developments in prebiotics to selectively impact beneficial microbes and promote intestinal health. Curr Opinion Biotechnol. 2015; 32: 42–46
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (112)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
27. Thomas, L.V. Probiotics-the journey continues. Int J Dairy Tech. 2016; 69: 1–12
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (22)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
28. Hutkins, R.W., Krumbeck, J.A., Bindels, L.B., Cani, P.D., Fahey, G., Goh, Y.J. et al. Prebiotics: why definitions matter. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016; 37: 1–13
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (122)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
29. Tanaka, R., Takayama, H., Morotomi, M., Kuroshima, T., Ueyama, S., Matsumoto, K. et al. Effects of administration of TOS and Bifidobacterium breve 4006 on the human fecal flora. Bifidobact Microflora. 1983; 2: 17–24
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
30. Pena, A.S. Intestinal flora, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and novel foods. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007; 99: 653–658
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
31. Pokusaeva, K., Fitzgerald, G.F., and Sinderen, D. Carbohydrate metabolism in bifidobacteria. Genes Nutr. 2011; 6: 285–306
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (255)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
32. Tufarelli, V. and Laudadio, V. An overview on the functional food concept: prospectives and applied researches in probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. J Exp Biol Agric Sci. 2016; 4: 274–278
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
33. Tejero-Sarinena, S., Barlow, J., Costabile, A., Gibson, G.R., and Rowland, I. Antipathogenic activity of probiotics against Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium difficile in anaerobic batch culture systems: is it due to synergies in probiotic mixtures or the specificity of single strains?. Anaerobe. 2013; 24: 60–65
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (27)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
34. Kareem, K.Y., Ling, F.H., Chwen, L.T., Foong, O.M., and Asmara, S.A. Inhibitory activity of postbiotic produced by strains of Lactobacillus plantarum using reconstituted media supplemented with inulin. Gut Pathog. 2014; 6: 1–7
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (15)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
35. Simova, E.D., Beshkova, D.B., and Dimitrov, P. Characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Bulgarian dairy products. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 106: 692–701
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (56)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
36. Ammor, S., Tauveron, G., Dufour, E., and Cheval‎lier, I. Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria against spoilage and pathogenic bacteria isolated from the same meat small-scale facility. Screening and characterization of the antibacterial compounds. Food Control. 2006; 17: 454–461
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (124)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
37. Figueroa-Gonzalez, I., Cruz-Guerrero, A., and Quijano, G. The benefits of probiotics on human health. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2011; S1: 003
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
38. Waigankar, S.S. and Patel, V. Role of probiotics in urogenital healthcare. J Midlife Health. 2011; 2: 5–10
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
39. Hanson, L., Vusse, L.V., Jerme, M., Abad, C.L., and Safdar, N. Probiotics for treatment and prevention of urogenital infections in women: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61: 339–355
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (21)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
40. Chan, P.A., Robinette, A., Montgomery, M., Almonte, A., Cu-Uvin, S., Lonks, J.R. et al. Extra genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 5758387: 17
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
41. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas. ([Accessed 15 November 2017])IDF Diabetes Atlas,Chausséede la Hulpe 166, 1170 Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium; 2017
    http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
42. Iqbal, M.Z., Qadir, M.I., Hussain, T., Janbaz, K.H., Khan, Y.H., and Ahmad, B. Probiotics and their beneficial effects against various diseases. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2014; 27: 405–415
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
43. Larsen, N., Vogensen, F.K., van-den-Berg, F.W., Nielsen, D.S., Andreasen, A.S., Pedersen, B.K. et al. Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults. PLoS One. 2010; 5: 1–10
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (1121)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
44. Barz, M.L., Anhe, F.F., Varin, T.V., Desjardins, Y., Levy, E., Roy, D. et al. Probiotics as complementary treatment for metabolic disorders. Diabetes Metab J. 2015; 39: 291–303
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (50)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
45. Barrett, H.L., Callaway, L.K., and Nitert, M.D. Probiotics: a potential role in the prevention of gestational diabetes?. Acta Diabetol. 2012; 49: 1–13
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (22)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
46. Barrett, E., Ross, R.P., O'Toole, P.W., Fitzgerald, G.F., and Stanton, C. γ-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. J Appl Microbiol. 2012; 113: 411–417
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (333)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
47. Hu, C., Wong, F.S., and Wen, L. Type 1 diabetes and gut microbiota: friend or foe?. Pharmacol Res. 2015; 98: 9–15
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (23)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
48. Ljungberg, M., Korpela, R., Ilonen, J., Ludvigsson, J., and Vaarala, O. Probiotics for the prevention of beta cell autoimmunity in children at genetic risk of type-1 diabetes-the PRODIA study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1079: 360–364
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (38)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
49. Hartstra, A.V., Bouter, K.E.C., Backhed, F., and Nieuwdorp, M. Insights into the role of the microbiome in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38: 159–165
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (215)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
50. Grover, S., Rashmi, H.M., Srivastava, A.K., and Batish, V.K. Probiotics for human health-new innovations and emerging trends. Gut Pathog. 2012; 4: 1–14
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (29)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
51. Karimi, G., Sabran, M.R., Jamaluddin, R., Parvaneh, K., Mohtarrudin, N., Ahmad, Z. et al. The anti-obesity effects of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota versus Orlistat on high fat diet-induced obese rats. Food Nutr Res. 2015; 59: 1–8
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (33)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
52. Kang, J.-H., Yun, S.-I., Park, M.-H., Park, J.-H., Jeong, S.-Y., and Park, H.-O. Anti-obesity effect of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 in high-sucrose diet-induced obese mice. PLoS One. 2013; 8: 1–8
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
53. Palumbo, V.D., Marcello, R., Gammazza, A.M., Carini, F., Damiani, P., Damiano, G. et al. The long-term effects of probiotics in the therapy of ulcerative colitis: a clinical study. Biomed Pap. 2016; 160: 372–377
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (13)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
54. Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Cianci, R., Bibbo, S., Gasbarrini, A., and Curro, D. The involvement of gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: potential for therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;149: 191–212
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (93)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
55. Cammarota, G., Pecere, S., Ianiro, G., Masucci, L., and Curro, D. Principles of DNA-based gut microbiota assessment and therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in gastrointestinal diseases. Dig Dis. 2016; 34: 279–285
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (18)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
56. Spiller, R. Irritable bowel syndrome: new insights into symptom mechanisms and advances in treatment. F1000Research. 2016; 5: 1–11
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
57. Curro, D., Ianiro, G., Pecere, S., Bibbo, S., and Cammarota, G. Probiotics, fiber and herbal medicinal products for functional and inflammatory bowel disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2016; 173: 61–68
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
58. Shahverdi, E. Probiotics and gastrointestinal diseases. Int J Dig Dis. 2016; 2: 1–2
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
59. Gowri, R.S., Meenambigai, P., Prabhavathi, P., Rajeswari, P.R., and Yesudoss, L.A. Probiotics and its effects on human health-a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2016; 5: 384–392
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
60. World Health Organization. Cancer fact sheet 2017. World Health Organization, Switzerland; 2017
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
61. Vidya, S. and Thiruneelakandan, G. Probiotic potentials of lactobacillus and its anti-cancer activity. Int J Curr Res. 2015; 7: 20680–20684
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
62. Gayathri, D. and Rashmi, B.S. Anti-cancer properties of probiotics: a natural strategy for cancer prevention. EC Nutrition. 2016; 5: 1191–1202
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
63. Vafaeie, F. Critical review on probiotics and its effect on cancer. vol. 2. Cancer Press, ; 2016: 30–34
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
64. So, S.S., Wan, M.L., and El-Nezami, H. Probiotics-mediated suppression of cancer. Curr Opinion Oncol. 2017; 29: 62–72
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (14)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
65. Kahouli, I., Malhotra, M., Alaoui-Jamali, M.A., and Prakash, S. In-vitro characterization of the anti-cancer activity of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221 and potential against colorectal cancer cells. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2015; 7: 224–235
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
66. Awaisheh, S.S., Obeidat, M.M., Al-Tamimi, H.J., Assaf, A.M., EL-Qudah, J.M., Al-khazaleh, J.M. et al. In vitro cytotoxic activity of probiotic bacterial cell extracts against Caco-2 and HRT-18 colorectal cancer cells. Milk Sci Int. 2016; 69: 27–31
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
67. Akelma, A.Z. and Topcu, Z.I.K. Probiotics and allergic disease. World J Immunol. 2016; 6I: 75–82
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     | 
    • Google Scholar
68. Song, S., Lee, S.J., Park, D.-J., Oh, S., and Lim, K.-T. The anti-allergic activity of Lactobacillus plantarum L67 and its application to yogurt. J Dairy Res. 2016; 99: 9372–9382
    • View in Article 
    • | Abstract
     
    • | Full Text
     
    • | Full Text PDF
     
    • | Scopus (8)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
69. Takeda, S., Hidaka, M., Yoshida, H., Takeshita, M., Kikuchi, Y., Tsend-Ayush, C. et al. Antiallergic activity of probiotics from Mongolian dairy products on type I allergy in mice and mode of antiallergic action. J Funct Foods. 2014; 9: 60–69
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (12)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
70. Flkman, J. Angiogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 2006; 57: 1–18
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (1014)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
71. Folkman, J. Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6: 273–286
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (1645)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
72. Mayer, E.A., Tillisch, K., and Gupta, A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2015; 125: 926–938
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (382)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
73. Tillisch, K. The effects of gut microbiota on CNS function in humans. Gut Microbes. 2014; 5: 404–410
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (55)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
74. Umbrello, G. and Esposito, S. Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med. 2016; 14: 1–11
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (30)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
75. Messaoudi, M., Lalonde, R., Violle, N., Javelot, H., Desor, D., Nejdi, A. et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2011; 105: 755–764
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (520)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
76. Rao, A.V., Bested, A.C., Beaulne, T.M., Katzman, M.A., Iorio, C., Berardi, J.M. et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2009; 1: 1–6
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
77. Szajewska, H. What are the indications for using probiotics in children?. Arch Dis Child. 2016; 101: 398–403
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (20)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
78. Daliri, E.B.M., Oh, D.H., and Lee, B.H. Psychobiotics; a promise for neurodevelopmental therapy. J Probiotics Health. 2016; 4: 1–4
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
79. Nogueiras, R., Romero-Pico, A., Vazquez, M.J., Novelle, M.G., and Lopez, M. The opioid system and food intake: homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms. Obes Facts. 2012; 5: 196–207
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (61)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
80. Kelly, G. Inulin-type prebiotics – a review: Part 1. Altern Med Rev. 2008; 13: 315–329
    • View in Article 
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
81. Moreno, F.J., Corzo, N., Montilla, A., Villamiel, M., and Olano, A. Current state and latest advances in the concept, production and functionality of prebiotic oligosaccharides. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2017; 13: 50–55
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (21)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
82. Villamiel, M., Montilla, A., Olano, A., and Corzo, N. Production and bioactivity of oligosaccharides derived from lactose. in: F.J. Moreno, M.L. Sanz (Eds.) Food oligosaccharides: production, analysis and bioactivity. Wiley Blackwell, ; 2014: 137–167
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (13)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
83. Trollope, K.M., van Wyk, N., Kotjomela, M.A., and Volschenk, H. Sequence and structure-based prediction of fructosyltransferase activity for functional sub classification of fungal GH32 enzymes. FEBS J. 2015; 282: 4782–4796
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (12)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
84. Devlamynck, T., Te Poele, E.M., Meng, X., van Leeuwen, S.S., and Dijkhuizen, L. Glucansucrase Gtf180-DN of Lactobacillus reuteri 180: enzyme and reaction engineering for improved glycosylation of non-carbohydrate molecules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016; 100: 7529–7539
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (11)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
85. Schmid, J., Heider, D., Wendel, N.J., Sperl, N., and Sieber, V. Bacterial glycosyltransferases: challenges and opportunities of a highly diverse enzyme class toward tailoring natural products. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 182
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (25)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
86. FDA. GRAS notice (GRN) No. 571. 20–Fucosyllactose. ; 2015
    http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GRAS/NoticeInventory/default.htm
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
87. Collins, S. and Reid, G. Distant site effects of ingested prebiotics. Nutrients. 2016; 8: 523
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (23)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
88. Zhou, Y., Kruger, C., Ravi, G.S., Kumar, D.P.S., Vijayasarathi, S.K., Lavingia, M. et al. Safety eval‎uation of galactooligosaccharides: sub chronic oral toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Res Appl. 2017; 1: 1–12
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
89. Savignac, H.M., Corona, G., Mills, H., Chen, L., Spencer, J.P., Tzortzis, G. et al. Prebiotic feeding elevates central brain derived neurotrophic factor, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits and d-serine. Neurochem Int. 2013; 63: 756–764
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (119)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
90. Williams, S., Chen, L., Savignac, H.M., Tzortzis, G., Anthony, D.C., and Burnet, P.W. Neonatal prebiotic (BGOS) supplementation increases the levels of synaptophysin, GluN2A-subunits and BDNF proteins in the adult rat hippocampus. Synapse. 2016; 70: 121–124
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (28)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
91. Pretorius, R., Prescott, S.L., and Palmer, D.J. Taking a prebiotic approach to early immunomodulation for allergy prevention. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018; 14: 43–51
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (7)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
92. Hong, K.B., Jeong, M., Han, K.S., Kim, J.H., Park, Y., and Suh, H.J. Photoprotective effects of galacto-oligosaccharide and/or Bifidobacterium longum supplementation against skin damage induced by ultraviolet irradiation in hairless mice. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015; 66: 923–930
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (9)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
93. Gibson, G.R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M.L., Prescott, S.L., Reimer, R.A., Salminen, S.J. et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 14: 491–502
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (494)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
94. Kano, M., Masuoka, N., Kaga, C., Sugimoto, S., Iizuka, R., Manabe, K. et al. Consecutive intake of fermented milk containing Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult and galacto-oligosaccharides benefits skin condition in healthy adult women. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2013; 32: 33–39
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     | 
    • Google Scholar
95. Roberfroid, M., Gibson, G.R., Hoyles, L., McCartney, A.L., Rastall, R., Rowland, I. et al. Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits. Br J Nutr. 2010; 104: S1–S63
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (1014)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
96. Yoo, J.Y. and Kim, S.S. Probiotics and prebiotics: present status and future perspectives on metabolic disorders. Nutrients. 2016; 8: 173
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | PubMed
     
    • | Scopus (78)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
97. Dixit, Y., Wagle, A., and Vakil, B. Patents in the field of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics: a review. J Food Microbiol Saf Hygiene. 2016; 1: 1–13
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
98. Nguyen, H.-T., Truong, D.-H., Kouhounde, S., Ly, S., Razafindralambo, H., and Delvigne, F. Biochemical engineering approaches for increasing viability and functionality of probiotic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17: 1–18
    • View in Article 
    • | Crossref
     
    • | Scopus (17)
     | 
    • Google Scholar
99. Eid, R., Jakee, J.E., Rashidy, A., Asfour, H., Omara, S., Kandil, M.M. et al. Potential antimicrobial activities of probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from raw milk. J Probiotics Health. 2016; 4: 1–8
    • View in Article 
    | 
    • Google Scholar
100. Onyenweaku, F., Obeagu, E.I., Ifediora, A.C., and Nwandikor, U.U. Health benefits of probiotics. Int J Innov Appl Res. 2016; 4: 21–30
     • View in Article 
     | 
     • Google Scholar
101. Sornplang, P. and Piyadeatsoontorn, S. Probiotic isolates from unconventional sources: a review. J Anim Sci Tech. 2016; 58: 1–11
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      | 
     • Google Scholar
102. Arora, T., Singh, S., and Sharma, R.K. Probiotics: interaction with gut microbiome and antiobesity potential. Nutrition. 2013; 29: 591–596
     • View in Article 
     • | Abstract
      
     • | Full Text
      
     • | Full Text PDF
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (78)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
103. Westermann, C., Gleinser, M., Corr, S.C., and Riedel, C.U. A critical eval‎uation of Bifidobacterial adhesion to the host tissue. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 1–8
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (11)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
104. Tsilingiri, K. and Rescigno, M. Postbiotics: what else?. Benef Microbes. 2012; 4: 101–107
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (60)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
105. Zagato, E., Mileti, E., Massimiliano, L., Fasano, F., Budelli, A., Penna, G. et al. Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 metabolic products and fermented milk for infant formula have anti- inflammatory activity on dendritic cells in vitro and protective effects against colitis and an enteric pathogen in vivo. PLoS One. 2014; 9: 1–14
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (31)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
106. Tiptiri-Kourpeti, A., Spyridopoulou, K., Santarmaki, V., Aindelis, G., Tompoulidou, E., Lamprianidou, E.E. et al. Lactobacillus casei exerts anti-proliferative effects accompanied by apoptotic cell death and up-regulation of TRAIL in colon carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2016; 11: 1–20
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (47)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
107. Sabater-Molina, M., Larque, E., Torrella, F., and Zamora, S. Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides and potential benefits on health. J Physiol Biochem. 2009; 65: 315–328
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (136)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
108. Patel, S. and Goyal, A. The current trends and future perspectives of prebiotics research: a review. 3 Biotech. 2012; 2: 115–125
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      | 
     • Google Scholar
109. Oliveira, R.P.D.S., Florence, A.C.R., Perego, P., De Oliveira, M.N., and Converti, A. Use of lactulose as prebiotic and its influence on the growth, acidification profile and viable counts of different probiotics in fermented skim milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011; 145: 22–27
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (46)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
110. Zhou, X., Ruan, Z., Huang, X., Zhou, Y., Liu, S., and Yin, Y. The prebiotic lactosucrose modulates gut metabolites and microbiota in intestinal inflammatory rats. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 23: 157–163
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (8)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
111. Torres, D.P.M., Goncalves, M.P.F., Teixeira, J.A., and Rodrigues, L.R. Galacto-oligosaccharides: production, properties, applications, and significance as prebiotics. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010; 9: 438–454
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (280)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
112. Rycroft, C.E., Jones, M.R., Gibson, G.R., and Rastall, R.A. A comparative in vitro eval‎uation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides. J Appl Microbiol. 2001; 91: 878–887
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (451)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
113. Aachary, A.A. and Prapulla, S.G. Xylooligosaccharides (XOS) as an emerging prebiotic: microbial synthesis, utilization, structural characterization, bioactive properties, and applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2011; 10: 1–16
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (213)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
114. Moro, G., Arslanoglu, S., Stahl, B., Jelinek, J., Wahn, U., and Boehm, G. A mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides reduces the incidence of atopic dermatitis during the first six months of age. Arch Dis Child. 2006; 91: 814–819
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (422)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
115. Fuentes-Zaragoza, E., Sanchez-Zapata, E., Sendra, E., Sayas, E., Navarro, C., Fernandez-Lopez, J. et al. Resistant starch as prebiotic: a review. Starch Starke. 2011; 63: 406–415
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | Scopus (160)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
116. Hoseinifar, S.H., Ahmadi, A., Raeisi, M., Hoseini, S.H., Khalili, M., and Behnampour, N. Comparative study on immunomodulatory and growth enhancing effects of three prebiotics (galactooligosaccharide, fructooligosaccharide and inulin) in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016; 58: 1–10
     • View in Article 
     • | PubMed
      | 
     • Google Scholar
117. Han, W.-C., Byun, S.-H., Kim, M.-H., Sohn, E.H., Lim, J.D., Um, B.H. et al. Production of lactosucrose from sucrose and lactose by a levansucrase from Zymomonas mobilis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 19: 1153–1160
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      | 
     • Google Scholar
118. Macfarlane, G.T., Steed, H., and Macfarlane, S. Bacterial metabolism and health-related effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and other prebiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2008; 104: 305–344
     • View in Article 
     • | PubMed
      | 
     • Google Scholar
119. Bartosch, S., Woodmansey, E.J., Paterson, J.C., McMurdo, M.E., and Macfarlane, G.T. Microbiological effects of consuming a synbiotic containing Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and oligofructose in elderly persons, determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction and counting of viable bacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40: 28–37
     • View in Article 
     • | Crossref
      
     • | PubMed
      
     • | Scopus (137)
      | 
     • Google Scholar
120. Bird, A.R., Brown, I.L., and Topping, D.L. Starches, resistant starches, the gut microflora and human health. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2000; 1: 25–37