1. one might be forgiven for thinking that the story of wildlife conversation is one of unrelenting gloom ,as forest are chopped down and savannahs put to the plough
대충 해석은 되는데 savannahs put to the plough(쟁기 밭을 갈다 갈아 일구다) 좀 매끄럽지가 않아서요
2. her semester in los Angeles was as interesting and involving ( as her senior year studying in Europe가 생략)
그년의 대학학기는 흥미로웠다 그리고 involving 했다 그녀의 대학 4학년 유럽에서 공부했던 것 처럼 이런식인데 involving 의 해석이 제 능력상으로는 좀 헷갈리네요
3. some now content that it does not have noun cases at all , others( contend) that it has two , one for the possessive , the other for everything else while still others maintain that there are three or four cases.
문법의 격에 대한 내용인데 알듯 말듯 문장 구조도 파악해 주시면 감사하겠습니다.
4.they survive across a huge swathe of North America
swathe : 천 붕대 한줄
5. comment of the cloning proponents , coming a week after the House of Representative voted to ban cloning even for medical research , will indoubtedly in flame the debate over the wisdom of creating babies that are genetic replicas of adults
-> comment of the cloning proponents 뒤에 분사구문이 있고 comment of the cloning proponents
의 주어가 will 인것 같은데 coming a week after the House of Representative voted to ban cloning even for medical research를 어떻게 해석할지 애매합니다.
6. given that when clones were born a high proportion died soon after birth
-> 고려하면 복제생물이 죽을 확률이 높은채로 태어나는것 태어나자 마자 이렇게 해석 하는게 맞는 건지 틀리다면 올바른 해석 올려주세요
7. The drive for sleep is so powerful among mammals that when dolphins, whose brain sleep one hemisphere at a time , are deprived of sleep , the hemispheres independtly keep track of how much sleep they have lost.
=> the drive for sleep 부터 먼말인지 ㅠ
8. After a good night's sleep a problem that seemed insurmountable the night before can often appear more manageable , although the evidence until now has been anecdotal. If you have some newly acquired memories in your brain sleep act on these memories , restructures them , so that after sleep the insight into problem which you could not solve before increases.
알듯 말듯 문장구조도 좀 복잡한것 같기도 하고 올바른 문장구조와 해석좀 부탁할게요