|
케이르 스타머 경 : 3극 위원회와 제프리 엡스타인
Sir Keir Starmer: The Trilateral Commission and Jeffrey Epstein
By Paul Knaggs
Dec 1, 2020 - 1:51:21 AM
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=216183
Labour Heartlands Feb 24, 2020
워싱톤 포스트는 '워터게이트 스캔들'을 밝힌 출판물이 미국 독자들에게 국가를 뒤흔든 음모를 드러냈고, 같은 신문은 또한 '깊은 국가 (Deep State)'라고 불리는 것과 어두운 연관성을 가진 조직인 삼극 위원회에 대한 진실을 밝혔습니다. 해당 출판물의 제목은 다음과 같습니다.
닫힌 문 뒤에서 그들은 숨겨진 곳에서 만난다. 어떤 이들은 그들을 세계를 운영하는 "그림자 정부", "기득권부", "글로벌 엘리트"라고 부릅니다.
그들은 단순히 자신을 부르는데 ...
그게 삼극 위원회 TRILATERAL COMMISSION 입니다.
The Washington Post the publication that brought to light ‘The Watergate scandal' revealed to its American readers a conspiracy that shook a nation, The same newspaper also brought to light the truth about the Trilateral Commission an organisation with dark connections to what's termed the ‘Deep State' the title of that publication was:
Behind closed doors, they meet hidden away. Some call them "the shadow government," "the Establishment," the "global elite" that runs the world.
They call themselves simply ...
‘삼극 위원회 The Trilateral Commission'
47 년 된 삼극 위원회 조직이 일을 쉽게 하는데 도움을 주는 음모 이론이 많이 있습니다. 그들은 반 민주적, 반 기독교적 또는 반 노동자로부터 다양하며 궁극적으로 국가의 주권을 폐지하고 단일 세계정부를 수립하는 계획을 세우고 있습니다! 그러나 때로는 음모 이론이 필요하지 않으며 진실은 훨씬 더 충격적입니다.
There are plenty of conspiracy theories about the Trilateral Commission this 47-year-old organisation helps in making them easy work. They range from, anti-democratic, anti-Christian or anti-worker, and that it is scheming ultimately to abolish the sovereignty of nations and establish one-world government! However, sometimes you don't need conspiracy theories, the truth is far more shocking.
삼극 위원회를 조심하십시오!BEWARE THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION!
대부분의 기자 / 기자 또는 논평가는 멀리 떨어진 음모를 탐구하거나 조명하지 않는 경향이 있으며, 이는 평판을 파괴하고 다른 사람들이 독자 층을 경멸할 수있는 능력을 허용합니다. 실제 조사 저널리즘은 아주 오래 전에 죽었습니다. 오늘날 우리는 주류 언론을 위해 '제 4 계급 fourth estate'에서 직접 하나하나 떠먹여주는 뉴스 spoon feed를 제공하고 있습니다. 그 말은 뉴스가 완전 통제된다는 것입니다.
조지 오웰 George Orwell은 다음과 같이 썼습니다. "발행인과 편집자가 특정 주제를 인쇄하지 않도록 노력한다면 기소를 두려워하기 때문이 아니라 여론을 두려워하기 때문입니다. 이 나라에서 지적인 비겁은 작가 또는 언론인이 직면하게 되는데, 그 사실이 합당한 논의를 하지 않은 것으로 보입니다.
Most reporters/journalist or commentators tend not to explore or bring to light anything remotely conspiratorial, it ruins reputations and allows others the ability to scorn at the readership. Real investigative journalism died a very long time ago. Today we are spoon feed directly from the ‘fourth estate‘ for the mainstream our views are channelled directed and manipulated.
George Orwell writes: "If publishers and editors exert themselves to keep certain topics out of print, it is not because they are frightened of prosecution but because they are frightened of public opinion. In this country, intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a writer or journalist has to face, and that fact does not seem to me to have had the discussion it deserves.
지난 40 년 동안 주류 미디어가 수십 개의 경쟁 회사에서 단 6 개 대형 언론사로 통합된 것은 비밀이 아닙니다. 모든 미디어의 90 %를 구성하는 수백 개의 채널, 웹 사이트, 뉴스 매체, 신문 및 잡지는 사람들에게 선택의 환상을 주는 수단이 되었는데, 그 기업들은 극소수의 사람들에 의해 통제됩니다.
그러나 민주주의를 위해 우리는 항상 정보에 입각한 사회를 가져야 합니다. 거의 모든 민주주의 이론가 또는 민주적 정치 행위자는 정보에 입각한 유권자를 좋은 민주적 실천에 있어서 필수적이라고 생각합니다. 시민들은 자신이 누구 또는 무엇을 투표하고 있는지, 우리가 누구를 대표하도록 선택했는지, 그리고 그들의 협회가 누구이며 무엇인지 알아야 합니다. 우리가 회원 이익 청구서를 가지는 것이 바로 그 이유 때문입니다.
It is no secret that over the last 4 decades, mainstream media has been consolidated from dozens of competing companies to only six. Hundreds of channels, websites, news outlets, newspapers, and magazines, making up ninety percent of all media is controlled by very few people-giving people the illusion of choice.
But in the interest of democracy, we should always have an informed society. Almost every democratic theorist or democratic political actor sees an informed electorate as essential to good democratic practice. Citizens need to know who or what they are voting for, who are we choosing to represent us, and who and what are their associations. The very reason we have a members interests bill.
따라서 노동당 지도자가 우리 국민이 너무 많은 자유를 가지고 있다고 믿는 조직의 일원이라는 사실을 알게 되면 매우 우려해야 합니다.
노동 계급을 믿는 조직, 대중은 민주주의와 정부의 문제를 엘리트인 기득권 층에 맡기는 어떤 민주적 과정에서도 제거되어야만 합니다.
따라서 케이르 스타머 Keir Starmer 경이 사실 문제의 인물인데, 그가 정부와 민주주의에서 국민의 역할을 크게 축소시키려는 '신세계 권력' 옹호자이며, 매우 강력한 비민주적 조직인 그 조직의 구성원 임을 이해하는 것은 모든 노동당 구성원의 의무입니다.
It should, therefore, be very concerning when we find that the Labour Party Leader is a member of an organisation that believes, we the people have too much freedom too much democracy.
An organisation that believes the working class, the masses should be removed from any democratic process leaving the issues of democracy and government to the Elite, the establishment.
It is therefore incumbent on all Labour Party members to understand that Sir Keir Starmer is a member of such an organisation, a very powerful undemocratic organisation that advocates a ‘New world order‘ one of which the people's role in government and democracy is greatly reduced.
새로운 신세계 권력의 기초The foundations of a new world order
1973 년 데이빗 록펠러 David Rockefeller와 브레진스키 Zbigniew Brzezinski는 3극 위원회를 설립했습니다. 미국, 서유럽 및 일본의 비즈니스 및 정치계에서 영향력이 큰 사람들을 포함하는 이 위원회는 곧 권력의 산실 embryonic 또는 그림자 세계 정부 shadow world government를 구성하는 것으로 인식되었습니다.
이러한 글로벌 거버넌스와 국제 외교기구는 국경을 넘어 비공식적 영역과 공식적 영역을 통합하는 중첩된 지배 엘리트 네트워크의 산물로 간주되어야 합니다.
이것은 신자유주의 자유 시장 가치를 전세계에 전파하기 위해 만들어진 조직으로, 이제는 그들이 격렬하게 반대하는 민족주의, 포퓰리즘 및 보호주의의 확산을 관리하기 위한 형태와 사명을 재창조 해야합니다.
In 1973, David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski founded the Trilateral Commission. Involving highly influential people from business and politics in the US, Western Europe, and Japan, the Commission was soon perceived as constituting an embryonic or even shadow world government.
This global governance and body of international diplomacy should be considered a product of overlapping elite networks that merge informal and formal spheres across national borders.
An organisation that was created to spread neoliberal free-market values across the globe, that now finds itself having to recreate its form and mission to manage the spread of nationalism, populism and protectionism all of which they vehemently oppose.
신세계 권력을 옹호하는 사람들Advocates of a new world order
비평가들은 위원회가 삼극 위원회 산하에 있는 금융 및 산업 엘리트들의 이익을 위해 국제 문제를 관리하기 위해 국제 지배 계급 간의 글로벌 합의를 촉진한다고 비난합니다.
그에 대해 터무니없는 일이라고 삼극 위원회 위원들은 말합니다. 자기들은 북미, 서유럽 및 일본의 고위 기업 및 공공 정책 유형으로 구성된 세계 문제에 대한 "토론 그룹"일 뿐이라고 변명을 합니다. 위원회는 모든 사람의 향상을 위해 국제 협력을 촉진하는 것만 추구하고 있으니 사악한 것은 없다는 것이지요.
연례 보고서와 태스크포스 문서는 대중이 읽을 수 있습니다. 회원 목록은 비밀이 아닙니다. 그냥 물어 보면 커미션에서 물건을 보낼 것입니다. 디렉터리 지원에 전화할 수있는 사람은 누구나 뉴욕 전화번호를 얻을 수 있습니다.
Critics accuse the Commission of promoting a global consensus among the international ruling classes in order to manage international affairs in the interest of the financial and industrial elites under the Trilateral umbrella.
Preposterous, say members of the Trilateral Commission. It is merely a "discussion group" on world affairs, composed of high-level corporate and public-policy types from North America, Western Europe and Japan. The commission seeks only to promote international cooperation, for the betterment of everybody. Nothing sinister.
Its annual reports and task force papers are available for the public to read. Its membership list isn't secret. Just ask and the commission will send you stuff. Anyone who can dial directory assistance can get its New York phone number.
그럼에도 불구하고 많은 평범하고 교육받은 사람들은 3극 위원회가 무엇인지, 그것이 무엇을 하는지 전혀 알지 못합니다. 비록 그 전 회원들이 명부에서 빼라고 지시한 미국 대통령 지미 카터, 조지 부시, 빌 클린턴을 포함하여 매우 저명한 사람들을 포함하고 있음에도 불구하고, 몇 명만 나옵니다.
3극 위원회는 유럽, 북미 및 아시아 태평양 지역의 세 지역 위원장이 이끌고 있습니다. 지역 위원장에는 여러 명의 대리인과 실행위원회가 있습니다. 전체 멤버십은 매년 회전하는 장소에서 만나 전략과 조직 플랫폼을 고려합니다. 지역 및 국가 회의는 연중 내내 개최됩니다. 지역 본부는 워싱턴 D.C., 파리 및 도쿄에 있습니다.
Still, plenty of ordinary, educated people have no idea what the Trilateral Commission is or what it does, even though its former members include some very prominent people including US presidents Jimmy Carter, George Bush, Bill Clinton to name drop but a few.
The Trilateral Commission is led by three regional chairs for Europe, North America and the Asia-Pacific regions. The regional chairs have several deputies and an executive committee. The entire membership meets annually in rotating locations to consider their strategies and organisational platform. Regional and national meetings are held throughout the year. Regional headquarters are in Washington, D.C., Paris and Tokyo.
3극 위원회는 경제적, 정치적으로 권력을 행사합니다. 때때로 여성 회원이 적은 "부자 남성 클럽"으로 간주됩니다. 3극 위원회는 민간 기업, 경제적 자유, 글로벌 문제에 대한 집단적 관리 강화를 지지합니다. 회원에는 영향력있는 현 정치인, 은행 및 기업 임원, 미디어, 시민 및 지적 지도자와 여러 노조 대표가 포함됩니다.
3극 위원회의 의제는 세계 최대 경제권 지도자 간의 G7 정상 회담과 일치합니다. 회원들은 미국 행정부와 다른 회원국 정부에서 주요 직책을 맡았습니다.
The Trilateral Commission wields its power economically and politically. It is sometimes considered a "rich men's club" with few women members. The Trilateral Commission espouses support for private enterprise, economic freedom and stronger collective management of global problems. Its members include influential current politicians, banking and business executives, media, civic, and intellectual leaders and several union chiefs.
The Trilateral Commission's agendas sync with those of the G7 summits between the leaders of the world's largest economies. Members have held key positions in U.S. administrations and in the governments of other member countries.
정치인을 위한 다섯 가지 질문Five questions for politicians
1.당신들은 어떤 권한을 갖고 있습니까?
2.당신들은 그 권한을 어디서 얻습니까?
3.당신들은 누구의 이익을 위해 권한을 씁니까?
4.당신들은 누구에게 책임을 집니까?
5.우리는 당신들을 어떻게 하면 제거할 수있습니까?
- 토니 벤
케이르 스타머 경 : 3극 위원회 위원 노동 지도자 Sir Keir Starmer: Trilateral commission member Labour Leader
케이르 스타머 경은 자신을 좌파로 내세우는 데 능숙한 것 같습니다. 그와 그의 지지자들은 자신의 소위 "좌익 자격 증명"을 강조하면서 "당을 단결할 것"이라고 주장합니다.
20 대에 그가 트로츠키주의 잡지를 편집했다고 들었을 것입니다. 또는 그는 1984/5에서 파업에 나서는 광부들의 변호인이었습니다. 그가 피켓 라인에서 맥도날드의 노동자들 옆에 서있었습니다.
Sir Keir Starmer seems to be doing a good job at pitching himself as being on the Left. He and his supporters make claim he will "unite the party" while making a point to emphasise his so-called "Left-wing credentials".
그러나 케이르 스타머 경과 그의 지지자들이 이야기하지 않는 하나의 협회가 있습니다 ....But there is one association Sir Kier Starmer and his supporters are not talking about....
스타머 경이 2015 년에 노동당 의원으로 5 년 만에 노동당 지도자로 선출될 수있는 방법에 대해 궁금해 한 적이 있다면, 그것은 의회 임기 중 하나입니다. 그의 친구와 그가 속한 조직을 살펴보십시오.
"나는 삼극 위원회와 그것이 존재하는 지배에 대한 충성을 맹세한다. 모두를 위한 폭정과 가난, 하향식 질서로 분열할 수없는 하나의 행성 ..."
스타머 Starmer가 회원인 삼극 위원회. 다른 회원에는 AT & T 및 ITT와 같은 다국적 대기업의 최고 경영진이 포함됩니다.
Mobil 및 Exxon과 같은 석유 회사뿐만 아니라 Chase Manhattan Bank, First Chicago Corp, General Electric, TRW, Archer Daniels Midland, Pepsi, RJR Nabisco, Nissan, Toshiba, Fuji Bank 및 Goldman Sachs의 최고CEO이기도 합니다.
If you have ever wondered how Sir Keir Starmer could go from being first elected in 2015 as a Labour MP to Labour Leader in 5 years, That's one parliamentary term, maybe look at his friends and the organisations he belongs.
"I pledge allegiance to the Trilateral Commission, and to the domination for which it stands, one planet, indivisible, with tyranny and poverty and top-down order for all..."
The Trilateral Commission, of which Starmer is a member. Other members, include top executives of multinational conglomerates such as AT&T and ITT. Oil companies such as Mobil and Exxon, but also the top CEOs of the Chase Manhattan Bank, First Chicago Corp, General Electric, TRW, Archer Daniels Midland, Pepsi, RJR Nabisco, Nissan, Toshiba, Fuji Bank and Goldman Sachs.
스타머의 이름은 2019 년 4 월 삼극 위원회의 회원 명단에 처음 등장했습니다. 650 명의 MP 중 회원으로 초대받은 사람은 그뿐입니다. 이들은 아마도 Keir 경이 그의 "좌익 자격"을 강조하는 그의 캠페인에 사용되는 이상적인 사진 기회로 여기는 사람들이 아닐 것입니다.
우리가 가지고있는 것은 "삼극 주의 : 세계 경영을 위한 삼극 위원회와 엘리트 계획"이라는 제목의 조직에 관한 책을 편집한 홀리 스클라 Holly Sklar가 "다국적 기업의 이익을 대변하는 위원회"라고 밝힌 단체의 일부인 스타머 Keir Starmer 경입니다. 기업과 은행 ". 이는 소위 '비 개발'국가와 전세계 노동자들의 이익에 반한다는 것을 의미합니다.
그들은 임금이 낮게 유지되기를 원합니다. 유권자들이 냉담하고 양극화되기를 원합니다.
Starmer's name first appeared on the membership list of the Trilateral Commission in April 2019. Out of 650 MP's, he was the only one invited to become a member. These perhaps aren't the sort of people Sir Keir would see as an ideal photo opportunity, to be used in his campaign highlighting his "lefty credentials".
What we have is Sir Keir Starmer, as part of an organisation that Holly Sklar, who edited a book on the organisation entitled "Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management", identifies as the commission that "represents the interests of multinational corporations and banks". This means it is contrary to the interests of so-called ‘non-developed' countries and workers the world over.
It wants wages kept low. It wants voters kept apathetic and polarised.
스클라 Sklar는 삼극 위원회가 "음모가 아니고" "전능하지 않다"고 말했습니다. "그러나 그것이 영향력이 없다는 것을 의미하지는 않습니다."그리고 위원회는 사우디를 설득하기 위해 경제적으로 OPEC을 "공동 작업" 하기 시작했습니다. '개발중인'세계에 투자하는 대신 석유 달러를 서방 은행에 투자하고 서구 무기를 구매합니다.
워싱턴, Vol. I and II (Wood & Sutton, 1978-1981) 및 Technocracy Rising : The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation. 의도 된 NIEO는 Technocracy였으며 현재 우리는 세계를 폭풍으로 몰아 넣고 있습니다. ⁃ LH 편집기
Sklar states that the Trilateral Commission "is not a conspiracy" and is not "omnipotent... "But that doesn't mean it's not influential." And the Commission set out to economically "co-opt" OPEC to persuade the Saudis to put their petrodollars into Western banks and to purchase Western arms, rather than investing in the ‘developing' world.
Trilaterals Over Washington, Vol. I and II (Wood & Sutton, 1978-1981) and Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation. The intended NIEO was and is Technocracy, which we now see taking the world by storm. ⁃ LH Editor
두 명의 삼극 위원회 위원과의 폭발적인 인터뷰에서 소수의 손에 의해 얼마나 많은 정치적 권력을 통제할 수 있는지 강조한 이 놀라운 잊혀진 역사, 미국 기자와 삼극 위원회 위원 두 위원 간의 1978 년 대화. (출처 : Trilateralism : Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).
대화는 당시 대중의 지식이었습니다.
In an explosive interview with two Trilateral Commission members, highlighting how much political power can be controlled in the hands of a few, this stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).
The conversation was public knowledge at the time.
Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.
But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.
The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy (which includes trade treaties) were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.
And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.
The 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter's administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.
The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing.
People often misunderstand how the game works. In the area of US foreign policy, for example, they focus on the long-standing rats' nest called the State Department.
Well, they should. But that bureaucracy implements policy. It doesn't really formulate the basics. The basics come from higher on the food chain.
삼극 위원회가 주도적인 세력인 세계주의 운동은 "단일 세계" 주제를 지시합니다. 분리된 국가들과 그들의 힘은 이 주제하에서 용해되고 하나의 전 지구적 관리 시스템으로 통합되야 합니다.
이 시스템은 궁극적으로 상품과 서비스 및 그 유통에 대한 전세계 생산 할당량을 결정합니다. 특히 에너지가 주요 목표입니다. 얼마가 생성됩니까? 누가 혜택을 받습니까? 누가 고통을 받을까요?
미국 연방 정부와 전세계의 다른 정부는 현재 우리를 "유토피아의 날"에 더 가까이 다가가려고 노력하고 있습니다.
줄을 당기는 그림자 속에는 누가 앉아 있습니까?
여기에 같은 대답이 있는 또 다른 질문이 있습니다. 자유 시장을 약화시켜 경제를 파괴하는 책임자는 누구입니까?
한 그룹은 사실상 잊혀졌습니다. 그 영향력은 엄청납니다. 그들은 1973 년부터 존재했던 것인데 말입니다.
The Globalist movement-within which the Trilateral Commission is a leading force-dictates a "one-world" theme. Separate nations and their power should be melted down and folded into one planet-wide management system.
This system would ultimately determine worldwide production quotas for goods and services, and their distribution. Energy, in particular, is a prime target. How much will be created? Who will benefit? Who will suffer?
The US federal government and other governments around the world are currently trying to bring us closer to that "utopian day."
Who sits in the shadows pulling their strings?
Here is another question that has the same answer: who is in charge of undermining free markets and thus taking down economies?
One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.
3극 위원회 Trilateral Commission 1973. Click to enlarge
그것을 3극 위원회 (TC)라고합니다. It's called the Trilateral Commission (TC).
3극 위원회 TC의 원래 명시된 목표는 "새로운 국제 경제질서"를 만드는 것이었습니다.
1969 년 데이비드 록펠러와 함께 TC가 탄생하기 4 년 전인 브레진스키 Zbigniew Brzezinski는 다음과 같이 썼습니다. "사람의 조직된 삶의 기본 단위인 국가 국가는 더 이상 주된 창조력이 아닙니다. 국제 은행과 다국적 기업은 국가의 정치적 개념보다 훨씬 앞선 용어입니다. "
안녕, 개개의 국가들이여.
Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create "a new international economic order."
In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: "[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state."
Goodbye, separate nations.
Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): "Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
The 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter's administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.
How does a shadowy group like the TC accomplish its goal? One basic strategy is: destabilize nations; ruin their economies; ratify trade treaties that effectively send millions and millions of manufacturing jobs off to places where virtual slave labor does the work; adding insult to injury, export the cheap products of those slave-factories back to the nations who lost the jobs and undercut their domestic manufacturers, forcing them to close their doors and fire still more employees.
And then solve that economic chaos by bringing order.
What kind of order?
Eventually, one planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, "to restore stability," "for the good of all, for lasting harmony."
노암 촘스키 : 신 자유주의가 우리의 민주주의를 파괴하고 있다 Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy
정치적 스펙트럼의 양측 엘리트가 어떻게 우리의 사회적, 정치적, 환경 적 공유지를 훼손했는지.
민주주의의 위기에 대한 촘스키, 삼극 위원회
-
노암 촘스키는 삼극 위원회의 목표는 엘리트들만 투표할 수 있도록 민주주의를 절제하는 것입니다. 민주주의와 노동 계급 운동의 후퇴입니다.
사회 비평가이자 학자인 노암 촘스키는 1970 년대 정치에 대한 강한 대중의 관심을 "민주주의의 과잉"으로 묘사한 출판물 민주주의 위기 The Crisis of Democracy를 지적하면서 비 민주주의위원회를 비판했습니다.
촘스키는 그것을 실제로 민주주의가 아니라 엘리트에 의해 통제되는 현대 민주주의 체제를 보여주는 가장 흥미롭고 통찰력있는 책 중 하나로 묘사했다.
How elites on both sides of the political spectrum have undermined our social, political, and environmental commons.
Chomsky on Crisis of Democracy by Trilateral Commission
-
Noam Chomsky says the Trilateral commission aim is to bring about a moderation in democracy to allow only the elite to vote. A backwards step in democracy and the working class movement.
Social critic and academic Noam Chomsky has criticised the commission undemocratic, pointing to its publication The Crisis of Democracy, which describes the strong popular interest in politics during the 1970s as an "excess of democracy".
Chomsky described it as one of the most interesting and insightful books showing the modern democratic system not to really be a democracy at all, but controlled by elites.
Apathy and obedience.
Two documents came out right in the mid-'70s, which are quite important. They came from opposite ends of the political spectrum, both influential, and both reached the same conclusions. One of them, at the left end, was by the Trilateral Commission-liberal internationalists, three major industrial countries, basically the Carter administration, that's where they come from.
That is the more interesting one [The Crisis of Democracy, a Trilateral Commission report]. The American rapporteur Samuel Huntington of Harvard, he looked back with nostalgia to the days when, as he put it, Truman was able to run the country with the cooperation of a few Wall Street lawyers and executives. Then everything was fine. Democracy was perfect.
But in the '60s they all agreed it became problematic because the special interests started trying to get into the act, and that causes too much pressure and the state can't handle that. We have to have more moderation in democracy.
"The cure for democracy is more democracy." He said, "No, the cure for this democracy is less democracy."
This is the liberal establishment. This is a consensus view of the liberal internationalists and the three industrial democracies. They-in their consensus-they concluded that a major problem is what they called, their words, "the institutions responsible for the indoctrination of the young." The schools, the universities, churches, they're not doing their job. They're not indoctrinating the young properly. The young have to be returned to passivity and obedience, and then democracy will be fine. That's the left end.
Now, what do you have at the right end? A very influential document, the Powell Memorandum, came out at the same time. Lewis Powell, a corporate lawyer, later Supreme Court justice, he produced a confidential memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, which has been extremely influential. It more or less set off the modern so-called "conservative movement." The rhetoric is kind of crazy. We don't go through it, but the basic picture is that this rampaging left has taken over everything. We have to use the resources that we have to beat back this rampaging New Left which is undermining freedom and democracy.
Connected with this was something else. As a result of the activism of the '60s and the militancy of labor, there was a falling rate of profit. That's not acceptable. So we have to reverse the falling rate of profit, we have to undermine democratic participation, what comes? Neoliberalism, which has exactly those effects.
Chomsky says that as it was an internal discussion they "let their hair down" and talked about how the public needs to be reduced to its proper state of apathy and obedience. Essentially liberal internationalists from Europe, Japan and the United States, the liberal wing of the intellectual elite.
The Trilateral Commission are concerned with trying to induce what they call a "more moderation in democracy"-turn people back to passivity and obedience so they don't put so many constraints on state power and so on. In particular they were worried about young people.
They are concerned about the institutions responsible for the indoctrination of the young (that's their phrase), meaning schools, universities, church and so on-they're not doing their job, [the young are] not being sufficiently indoctrinated. They're too free to pursue their own initiatives and concerns and you've got to control them better.
Critics accuse the Commission of promoting a global consensus among the international ruling classes in order to manage international affairs in the interest of the financial and industrial elites under the Trilateral umbrella.
정부 영향의 사례An example of Government influence
버락 오바마는 취임 첫 10 일 만에 삼극 위원회 위원 11 명을 행정부의 최고급 및 핵심 직책에 임명했습니다. 이것은 오바마 행정부 내부의 국제적 리더십의 매우 좁은 원천을 나타내며, 반드시 미국에서 일하는 사람들을 지원할 필요는 없는 핵심 의제를 가지고 있습니다.
오바마는 삼극 위원회의 핵심 위원들에 의해 대통령직을 맡았습니다. 특히 1973 년 데이비드 록펠러와 3극 위원회의 공동 창립자인 브레진스키 Zbigniew Brzezinski는 오바마의 주요 외교 정책 고문이었습니다.
Barack Obama appointed eleven members of the Trilateral Commission to top-level and key positions in his administration within his first ten days in office. This represents a very narrow source of international leadership inside the Obama administration, with a core agenda that is not necessarily in support of working people in the United States.
Obama was groomed for the presidency by key members of the Trilateral Commission. Most notably, Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973, has been Obama's principal foreign policy advisor.
According to official Trilateral Commission membership lists, there are only eighty-seven members from the United States (the other 337 members are from other countries). Thus, within two weeks of his inauguration, Obama's appointments encompassed more than 12 percent of Commission's entire US membership.
Trilateral appointees include:
* Secretary of Treasury, Tim Geithner
* Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
* National Security Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
* Deputy National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon
* Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volker
* Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
* Assistant Secretary of State, Asia & Pacific, Kurt M. Campbell
* Deputy Secretary of State, James Steinberg
* State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Haass
* State Department, Special Envoy, Dennis Ross
* State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Holbrooke
Trilateralist Brent Scowcroft has been an unofficial advisor to Obama and was mentor to Defense Secretary Robert Gates. And Robert Zoelick, current president of the World Bank appointed during the G.W. Bush administration, is a member.
어둠 편에 연계되다 Connections to the Dark side
도셋 아이 Dorset Eye의 제이슨 크리들랜드 Jason Cridland와 데이빗 히친 David Hitchen은 다음과 같이 썼습니다. 트럼프와 다른 우익 신보수 정부와 정당의 부상은 자유 시장이 공격을 받고 있음을 의미합니다. 신자유주의와 신보수주의는 항상 모순이었고 (대처주의와 레이건주의가 알아 낸 것처럼) 정치적 권리에 대한 요동은 경제적 권리의 이상에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤다.
삼극 위원회는 확실히 세계화와 그것이 국가 국가에 미치는 영향에 대한 의구심이 커지는 가운데, 일부 사람들이 삼극 위원회, 다보스, 빌더버그 Bilderberg, World Bank 및 IMF (International Monetary Fund)는 중요한 부분입니다.
Jason Cridland and David Hitchen from the Dorset Eye write: In 2019 the Commission published a report with the express aim of becoming more en vogue. The rise of Trump and other right-wing neoconservative governments and parties has meant that the free market has come under attack. Neoliberalism and neoconservatism was always a contradiction (as Thatcherism and Reaganism found out) and the lurch to the political right has had a negative effect upon the ideals of the economic right.
The Trilateral Commission has sought to reinvent its doctrine in the face of increasing suspicion, certainly of globalisation and its impacts upon nation-states but also in cases in which some people have become increasingly aware of the deep state in which the Tripartite Commission, Davos, Bilderberg, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are significant parts.
그들의 문제를 더하기 위해, 가장 저명한 사람들 사이에서, 전 헤지펀드 매니저이자 유죄 판결을 받은 성매매업자인 엡스타인 Jeffrey Epstein을 포함하여 이미 의심되는 평판을 다소 손상시킬 수있는 행동을 하는 사람들이 있습니다.
유유상종.' 엡스타인의 어둡고 어리석은 계략에 참여한 엘리트 3극 위원회의 현직 및 전 구성원 중 일부는 그의 성범죄가 중죄는 아니더라도 '뒤집어'서 그들의 방탕을 폭로하는 것에 대해 매우 긴장할 가능성이 거의 확실합니다. ' 물론 이것은 엡스타인 Jeffrey Epstein이 '공식적으로'2019 년 8 월에 자살하면서 이제 '해소되었습니다'. LINK
엡스타인 Mr. Epstein을 자세히 살펴 보겠습니다.
Epstein의 가장 놀라운 점 중 하나는 그가 미국에서 가장 강력하고 영향력있는 그룹의 일원이라는 것입니다.
To add to their problems there are those whose behaviour could somewhat tarnish their already suspect reputations including amongst the most prominent, Jeffrey Epstein, former hedge fund manager and convicted sex-trafficker
Birds of a feather, flock together.' It is almost certain that some current and former members of the elitist Trilateral Commission who participated in Epstein's follies are likely very nervous that he would ‘flip' and expose their debauchery, if not their sexual felonies.' This, of course, has now been ‘avoided' as Jeffrey Epstein ‘officially' took his own life in August 2019. LINK
Let's take a closer look at Mr. Epstein, shall we.
One of the most surprising things about Epstein is that he is a member of some of the most powerful and influential groups in the US.
엡스타인이 소속된 조직
He's a member of:
Profile
Click to enlarge
클린턴 외에 엡스타인이 연관된 인물들
Aside from Clinton who are the people that Epstein is associated with
Powerful associates, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew, have had their conduct scrutinised in the wake of the ongoing scandal.
Mr Mandelson, who was friends with Epstein's former lover Ghislaine Maxwell, was staying on the island of Saint Barthelemy when the pictures were taken.
Peter Mandelson shopping with Jeffrey Epstein on December 27, 2005, in St. Barts. Click to enlarge
But it is suggested the two may have met on other occasions.
In 2011, Virginia Roberts - who claims she was a sex slave to Epstein - said that she was introduced to Mr Mandelson at a dinner party at the financier's house in New York.
She said: "I never heard of Jeffrey knowing Tony Blair, but he did know Peter Mandelson. I remember him being at the house in New York and I was introduced to him at a dinner party.
One of Britain's most powerful politicians wasn't afraid to phone Jeffery Epstein looking for a favor - even while the pedophile was behind bars for sex crimes, according to a new documentary.
A new "Dispatches" documentary set to air on Britain's Channel 4 Monday claims Lord Peter Mandelson was Labour Business Secretary in 2009 when he called Epstein - then cooling his heels in a Florida jail after pleading to procuring an underage prostitute - trying to arrange a meeting with the boss of JP Morgan bank, according to The Sun.
The pedo and the politician were seemingly so close that Epstein even had a pet name for the UK cabinet member - calling him "Petie," according to the report. LINK
"I must say I was astonished that a British Cabinet minister at that time, probably the most powerful man other than the Prime Minister, was calling Jeffrey in jail," a friend of Epstein's who revealed the call told the documentary.
Here are some of the people that have current (past) membership in elite organizations.
Members of all three: CFR, Trilateral, Trilateral N.A. include
David Rockefeller Sr., Harold Brown, John Deutch, Mortimer Zuckerman, Richard Holbrooke
https://sli.mg/user/i/edit/?i=vRdWRg
|