(정동희 27) 전쟁범죄 수준에서 호주 정부가 앞으로 그 책임을 감당해야 할 '공익제보자에 대한 살인행위'를 즉각 멈추어라 2023

[정동희]

(정동희 27) 전쟁범죄 수준에서 호주 정부가 앞으로 그 책임을 감당해야 할 '공익제보자에 대한 살인행위'를 즉각 멈추어라
 
2023년 호주의 최대 수출 품목인 광물성 연료(석탄, 석유)와 광물의 수출은 전체 수출의 60% 이상을 차지했다
호주 광산물 수출 비중을 종류별로 살펴보면, ① 철광석과 금속 스크랩(총 수출의 29%) ② 석탄과 코크스 및 브라이퀘트(총 수출의 15%) ③ 가스(총 수출의 7%) 등이다.
로이힐 철광석 광산은 철광석 매장량이 23억 톤에 달하는 호주 최대의 단일 광산으로, 서호주 퍼스(Perth)에서 1,100km 떨어진 필바라 지역에 위치해 있습니다
따라서 퍼스는 누구보다 광산개발에 있어 필수적인 다이너마이트 사용에 대해 지리적으로 잘 알 수 있는 곳이다.
지금 퍼스를 포함한 서호주를 관할하는 법무장관은 '많은 것들을 위험하게 하고 어쩌면 산 자체를 무너지게 할 수 있는 엉뚱한 곳'에 다이너마이트 심지에 불을 붙이고 있다.
다이나마이트는 전체 광산 갱도가 무너지지 않게 설치된 게 확인되었을 때만, 그 심지에 불을 붙여야 한다.
그런데 지금 상황은 다음 상황과 같다.

① 산의 주인은 호주 국민인데, 호주 국민에게 알리지 않고 비공개로 해놓고 땅 밑에서 갱도를 만들고 다이너마이트를 터뜨린다.
(2024년 2월 호주 퍼스에서 발생한 호주 정부출자 은행장의 대규모 뇌물부패 사건을 비공개로 지정)

② 그 산 밑에 철광석이 있다는 걸 최초로 Zheng이 말해주었고, 호주 정부도 결과적으로 덕을 봄
(Zheng이 2024년2월6일 호주 퍼스 소재 호주정부출자 은행장의 뇌물 요구를 호주 금융당국(the Prudential Supervision Bureau)에 신고 / 2024년4월 호주정부는 피고인 전 호주출자은행장에게 과징금 18m usd 추징)

③ 매우 구체적으로 그 산 밑의 철광석 존재를 알려준 공익제보자 Zheng이 집에 가겠다고 말하니, 이 산과 전혀 관련 없는 다른 이야기를 억지로 연관지으며 그 돈 안내면 '내 권리를 모두 박탈하겠다'고 위협
(이 승소한 민사재판 종결절차에 관련지어 24년11월 제반 비용을 Zheng이 모두 내었는데, 예상 밖으로 피고 측 환율차이를 보상하라고 서호주 법무장관이 강제하여 그 돈을 마련한다고 한 달 시간을 소비.  
 이후 집에 귀가하려고 하니 갑자기 이 재판과 전혀 무관하고 이미 벌금도 완납한 2023년10월 벌금 건을 승소한 이 민사재판에 서호주 법무장관 등이 억지로 연관지어며 당초 벌금보다 3배 많은 벌금을 강제로 내게 하고 그 돈 안내면 '내 권리를 모두 박탈하겠다'고 위협.)

④ 이에 너무 놀란 공익제보자 Zheng은 호주 정부에 항의했고, 호주 정부는 25년 1월 6일 '이 돈이 너가 내야 될 절대적으로 마지막 비용이다'고 정부문서로 발행하고 그 문서 수신자 목록에 '광산 갱도 수위실'도 명시함. 
 (이에 너무 놀란 민사재판 승소자 원고 Zheng은 서호주 법무장관을 대리인을 보내 찾아가서 항의했고, 서호주 법무장관은 'This is absolutely fenal fees'라고 그날 오후에 정부문서로 발행하고 그 문서 수신처에 'The banking supervision bureau'도 명시.)

⑤ 이에 아직 갱도 안에서 나가지 못한 공익제보자 Zheng은 정부문서 약속을 전적으로 믿고 자기 목숨을 담보로 돈을 억지로 구해 25년1월17일에 납부했는데, 호주 정부는 24년11월에 이미 물어서 납부한 갱도 입구 출입료를 거액으로 부풀려 다시 내라고 강행하며 동시에 그 돈 안내면 '내 권리를 모두 박탈하겠다'고 다시 위협  
(2024년11월8일 나의 민사재판 종결 비용에 대한 문의에 대한 답변을 캡처해서 아래에 첨부한다. 그기에 명확하게 적혀있고 납부한 Remittance fee를 (마지막이라고 말했고 이를 믿고 돈을 납부한 25년1월17일 이후 불과 몇 일만인) 2025년 1월23일에 20여만불 넘게 부풀리며 서호주 법무장관과 The banking supervision bureau가 요청. 
동시에 그 돈 안내면 '내 권리를 모두 박탈하겠다'고 다시 위협.
24년 1월 6일에 내 질문에 '이게 절대적으로 마지막 비용이다'고 서호주 법무장관이 답했고 그 문서가 the banking supervision bureau에도 법적으로 배포되었다는 점이 중요하다. 만약 그 때 the banking supervision bureau 입장에서 아직도 내게 덜 받은 비용이 있으면 말을 해야 할 의무가 있는데, 안했다는 것은 누가 봐도 문제가 있는 것입니다.
지난주 금요일 그 때 저는 '이중 청구'에 대해서도 서호주 법무장관의 을 위치에 있어 그 의사를 간접적으로 대변하는 관계자에게 다음과 같이 말했습니다. "당시 나와 The banking supervision bureau 간의 문의와 답변을 전달한 '가 임원'이 얼마나 꼼꼼한 사람인지 너도 잘 알지 않으냐? 그 과정에서 24년11월 당시 'remittance fee'란 문구 증거가 내가 갖고 있고, 이건 이중청구가 분명하다" 그러니까 상대방 임원 관계자는 평상시 내가 이런 말을 할 때와 다른 대답을 다음과 같이 합니다 '송금비가 그 때 청구되었다고 하더라도, 이번에 The banking supervision bureau가 달라는 비용이 절반은 송금비이고 나머지 절반은 '계좌 개설비'인데 그동안 너한테 계좌 개설비를 청구한 적은 없지 않은가?'였습니다. 서호주 법무장관의 눈치를 바로 보는 그가 그런 대답을 나에게 한 것은 '내가 송금료 이중청구를 강하게 이의제기하고 있는 사실을 서호주 법무장관도 알고, 자기의 힘으로 이게 아니라고 밀어붙이고는 있으나 내 면전에서는 그러지 못한다는 사실입니다.)


제 사건 속에 ⓐ 호주 고위공무원 최대 규모의 뇌물부패사건 ⓑ 이를 자국국민에게 감추기 위한 비공개 호주 정부의 지정 ⓒ 저로 인해 호주 국고에 범죄자산 일부 18M USD 환수 ⓓ 그럼에도 민사소송 승소자이자 최초 공익제보자에게 별 건에 대한 이중처벌을 전혀 관계 없는 이 재판에 강제로 연결 ⓔ 서호주법무장관과 The banking supervision bureau의 remittance fee 이중청구 등의 앞으로 폭발 가능성이 있는 뇌관 5개 이상이 숨어져 있는 다이너마이트 심지에 불이 붙어 있다.

이 심지에 붙은 불이 다이너마이트 연쇄 폭발로 이어지는 시간은 호주시간 3월13일 오후6시이다.
시간이 매우 촉박하다.
존경하는 호주 국민은 호주 국민 몰래 지하에 불이 붙은 다이나마이트가 갱도 확장 차원이 아니라 (사람이 엄연히 그 산 위에 살고 있는) 이 산 전체를 무너지게 할 가능성이 높다는 점을 직시해야 할 것이다.
산은 자연법칙의 자연스러운 흐름에 따라 오랜 시간 생성된 결과물이다.
반면 다이너마이트는 인위적인 흐름을 만들고 매우 조심하고 국제상식과 국제법에 어긋나지 않게 (인간의 존엄성을 짓밟지 않고) 제한적으로 사용해야 할 것이다.
더구나 다이너마이트의 사용대상은 철광석 등 광물이어야 하며, 호주 국고에 24년4월 18M 범죄자신 일부를 환수하게 한 공익제보자에게 터뜨려서는 안 될 것이다.
이는 진짜 호주 정부의 살인행위이다.
전쟁범죄 수준에서 호주 정부가 앞으로 그 책임을 감당해야 할, 국제상식이 있는 OECD국가 정부가 해서는 안될 일을 지금 지루하게 강행하고 있다.

stop the ‘murder against public interest informants’ for which the Auz government must take responsibility in the future at the level of war crimes. (dynamite explosion)

(dynamite explosion) Immediately stop the ‘murder against public interest informants’ for which the Australian government must take responsibility in the future at the level of war crimes.

Exports of mineral fuels (coal, oil) and minerals, Australia's largest export items in 2023, accounted for more than 60% of total exports.

Looking at the share of Australia's mineral exports by type, they are: ① iron ore and metal scrap (29% of total exports), ② coal, coke and briquette (15% of total exports), and ③ gas (7% of total exports).  

The Roy Hill iron ore mine is Australia's largest single mine, with iron ore reserves of 2.3 billion tonnes, and is located in the Pilbara region, 1,100 km from Perth, Western Australia.

Therefore, Perth is a place that geographically knows better than anyone else about the use of dynamite, which is essential for mine development.

Now the Attorney General, who oversees Western Australia, including Perth, is lighting a wick of dynamite in 'the wrong place that could endanger many things and possibly cause the mountain itself to collapse'. 

Dynamite should be lit only when it has been confirmed that the entire mine shaft has been installed without collapsing.

But now the situation is as follows.

① The owner of the mountain is an Australian citizen, but they kept it private without informing the Australian people, built a tunnel under the ground, and exploded it with dynamite.

(The large-scale bribery and corruption case of the head of an Australian government-owned bank that occurred in Perth, Australia in February 2024 was designated as non-disclosed)

② Zheng was the first to tell the Australian government that there was iron ore under the mountain, and the Australian government also benefited as a result.

(Zheng reported a request for a bribe from the head of an Australian government-owned bank in Perth, Australia to the Prudential Supervision Bureau on February 6, 2024.

/ In April 2024, the Australian government imposed a fine of 18m USD on the defendant, the former head of an Australian-invested bank.)

③ When Zheng, the public interest informant who very specifically informed us of the existence of iron ore under the mountain, said he was going home, he forcibly related another story that had nothing to do with this mountain and threatened to 'deprive me of all my rights' if he gave me the money.

(Zheng paid all costs in November 2024 in connection with the civil trial closure procedure, but unexpectedly, the Attorney General of Western Australia forced him to compensate for the exchange rate difference between the defendants and spent a month trying to raise the money.

Afterwards, as I was about to return home, the Attorney General of Western Australia and others forcibly implicated me in this civil trial, which had nothing to do with this trial and won the fine case in October 2023, for which I had already paid the fine, and forced me to pay a fine three times greater than the original fine, and threatened to 'deprive me of all my rights' if I received the money.)

④ Public interest informant Zheng, who was so surprised by this, complained to the Australian government, and on January 6, 2025, the Australian government issued a government document saying, 'This is the absolute last cost you will have to pay,' and also included 'Mine Tunnel Guard Room' in the list of recipients of the document.

(So ​​surprised by this, Zheng, the plaintiff who won the civil trial, sent a representative to the Attorney General of Western Australia to complain, and the Attorney General of Western Australia issued a government document that afternoon saying 'This is absolutely fenal fees' and also specified 'The banking supervision bureau' as the recipient of the document.)

⑤ Accordingly, public interest informant Zheng, who had not yet been able to leave the tunnel, completely believed in the promise in the government document and put his life as collateral to forcibly obtain money and pay it on January 17, 2025. However, the Australian government inflated the tunnel entrance fee that he had already paid in November 24 to a large amount and forced him to pay it again, and at the same time threatened again that 'all my rights will be taken away' if the money was received.

(I am attaching a capture of the response to the inquiry about the cost of my civil trial settlement on November 8, 2024 below.

The Western Australian Attorney General and The Banking Supervision Bureau requested that the remittance fee, which was clearly written and paid, be inflated by more than $200,000 on January 23, 2025 (just a few days after January 17, 2025, when it was said to be the last time and the money was paid on January 17, 2025). At the same time, he threatened again that if he received the money, he would 'take away all my rights'. 

It is significant that the Attorney General of Western Australia responded to my question on 6 January 24 by saying 'this is absolutely the final cost' and that the document was also legally distributed to the banking supervision bureau. At that time, the banking supervision bureau has an obligation to tell me if I still have underpaid expenses, but not doing so is a problem for anyone to see.

Last Friday, I said the following about 'double billing' to an official indirectly representing the Attorney General of Western Australia's position. "Don't you know how meticulous the 'M executive' who relayed the inquiries and answers between me and The Banking Supervision Bureau at the time was? In the process, I have evidence of the phrase 'remittance fee' from November 24, and this is clearly double billing." So, the other executive gave a different answer than when I usually say this, saying, 'Even if the remittance fee was charged at that time, half of the fee requested by The Banking Supervision Bureau this time is a remittance fee and the other half is an 'account opening fee,' but they have never charged you an account opening fee, have they?' The reason he gave me such an answer as he was immediately aware of the attention of the Attorney General of Western Australia was, 'The Attorney General of Western Australia knows that I am strongly objecting to the double billing of remittance fees, and he is using his power to push that this is not the case, but he cannot do so in front of me.

In my case, ⓐ The largest bribery and corruption case among high-ranking public officials in Australia ⓑ Designated as a secret by the Australian government to hide it from the public ⓒ Due to me, some 18 million USD of criminal assets were returned to the Australian treasury ⓓ Nevertheless, the winner of the civil suit and the first public interest informant was forcibly connected to this completely unrelated trial to receive double punishment for a separate case ⓔ Double charging of remittance fees by the Attorney General of Western Australia and The Banking Supervision Bureau A dynamite wick with more than five potentially explosive detonators hidden in front of the back is lit.

The time when the fire on this wick leads to a chain reaction of dynamite explosions is at 6pm on March 13th, Australian time.

Time is very tight.

The respected Australian people must face the fact that the dynamite lit underground without the Australian people's knowledge is likely not to expand the mine, but to collapse the entire mountain (where people live on top of the mountain).

Mountains are the result of a long period of time created according to the natural flow of natural laws.

On the other hand, dynamite creates an artificial flow and must be used very carefully and limitedly so as not to violate international common sense and international law (without trampling on human dignity).

Moreover, the object of use of dynamite must be minerals such as iron ore, and it should not be exploded on a public interest informant who had the Australian government recover a portion of 18 million criminals from April 24.

This is truly an act of murder by the Australian government.

At the level of war crimes, the Australian government will have to take responsibility for it in the future, and is now tediously pushing ahead with things that governments of OECD countries with international common sense should not do.

(Our destination is the same: big picture) It's all up to AG and there's nothing I can do. the difference between a genius and an idiot is just a page of paper.

(Our destination is the same: big picture) Please support Western Australia's Attorney General to make "Zheng's 'Asia Star Model'" a model for coexistence.

From the Korean perspective, Australia does not have a king, but there are six governors appointed by the British king, including the federal governor and five state governors. 

And there is another system in Australia that does not exist in Korea. I vaguely believe that it originated from the Australian government not wanting various matters to be made public during the White Australia policy in the past, and there is a unique 'non-disclosure system' by the government.

Since my case was a large-scale bribery and corruption case involving a government-owned bank president, it was not easy for me to explain my case, so I had a hard time raising funds.

To put it in local English, my civil trial proceedings over the past year have been classified as a highly confidential case of the government, so unlike other general civil trial closure procedures, the Attorney General of Western Australia is directly acting as the top person. I think it's likely that I'm the first Korean to do something like this in this area.

Perhaps the Attorney General of Western Australia, as the chief officer responsible for the conclusion of my successful civil trial, will ask me the following questions:

“After paying the money on January 17th, why are you still asking for permission to borrow money without giving me even one dollar?”

My answer is, as I have said in recent posts, "I believed in the promise made in writing by the Attorney General of Western Australia on January 7, 2025, saying 'This is the final cost,' and borrowed money that I could not borrow, and paid it on January 17. It is very difficult for me that things have turned out like this."

In the end, the Attorney General of Western Australia may misunderstand me as 'I have no will to solve the problem by asking to borrow money without giving even a penny for an entire month,' but I would like to tell you that my answer is 'It's all because of you.'

If you ask me how desperate I am, I will say, 'Since I can't get the money, I will receive only the amount of compensation I paid and deposit the remaining civil lawsuit winnings to the Australian state. From the Australian government's point of view, it has emphasized twice that 'if I give up, the money will go to the bank manager's criminal account, but it will help the country's income, and it is better than not being able to receive even a penny', and has even said several times that it is in fact the only solution.

However, the Attorney General of Western Australia responded, 'The Australian legal system does not allow this and it is impossible, and there are only two options: give up or pay all costs and receive full compensation.'

The amount due on Monday is $124,648. This time 'anonymous' comes to $35,200.

I've been looking everywhere since the day before yesterday, and I'm not sure, but if the following conditions are met very dramatically, up to $33,000 could be possible by Monday afternoon.

The condition is that the Australian Attorney General allows the borrowing of the insufficient $56,448 and it is clear that everything will be completed without any additional costs.

They say that if even one of these things doesn't work, 33000 can't be borrowed monday afternoon.

My parents and I have no collateral and it is an extreme situation, so there is absolutely no way to get an extension.

So don't ever extend Monday

There is a possibility that the Attorney General, who made me and my parents go to such extremes, will end the situation by allowing borrowing of about $40,000 on Monday.

I haven't been able to get any money at all right now, and dramatically, the $33,000 that I have the possibility of getting on Monday afternoon is, 'If it is clear that the Attorney General of Western Australia will allow borrowing for the remaining $40,000, I can lend it.'

Therefore, if you don't ask the Attorney General this on Monday, there is no other way.

There are endless excuses to think of.

The Attorney General needs to think about how I got to this point by continuously paying over $600,000 to the Attorney General From 24th Dec 2024 to 17th Jan 2025 and becoming seriously bankrupt.

Moreover, even $33,000, the success of which was uncertain as to whether the conditional loan would be successful, was found to have some potential in a very dramatic way.

Monday is the last opportunity for the Attorney General to close the case by allowing another $40,000 loan.

It's all up to AG and there's nothing I can do.

The Attorney General must now take a very big picture, rather than taking a misunderstanding and malicious approach.

In the past, all continents were combined into a supercontinent called Pangaea. About 180 million years ago, this Pangaea began to break up and become what it is today.

This is a geological model published by German meteorologist Alfred Wegener in 1912.

In the supercontinent called Pangaea, the Australian continent was attached to the South American continent, and Africa was the next closest relative (see attached picture)

On the other hand, North America was the furthest away from Australia, and it was even further away from the Euro-Asian continent.

This is a great irony considering that Australia's ancestor was Britain, which was close to the Euro-Asian continent.

According to the theory of plate tectonics, “After 250 million years, only the supercontinent (Pangaea) called ‘Pangaea Ultima’ will exist on Earth, and the Atlantic Ocean will disappear and the Indian Ocean will become the inland sea of ​​this supercontinent.”

And in Australia, in extreme contrast to what it was 180 million years ago, in the next 250 million years, Antarctica will be the left border of the Australian continent and East Asia will be adjacent to the right border.

However, this year is 2025, and I am talking about the ‘Star of Asia’ model, which seems likely to become a reality in just 5 years.

The conclusion is that, geologically speaking, Australia will join East Asia in the future, but my argument is that the possibility of an 'Asian star' model should be kept in mind immediately in the epidemiological model five years from now, so that future generations of Australia and the future sustainability of the current Australian youth generation are guaranteed.

This is the expected flow that will appear after selecting scenario A and scenario B as shown below.

ⓐ Scenario A: If the Attorney General of Western Australia kills Dong-hee Zheng on March 10, 2025

More than half of Australia's population is white of European descent.

If these white Europeans were in Europe, they would often fight among themselves, as seen in the old Kosovo war.

However, unlike white Europeans, white Europeans living in Australia are surprisingly creating a 'WHITE AUSTRALIA' structure and robbing Asia of money, and that's with the Australian government directly taking action.

Conversely, this case shows that the group that benefited the most from the conflict in Asia was Australia.

This is because Asian countries were not fully aware that the Australian government was directly committing public atrocities that violated international law.

If I, who was the first to report the large-scale bribery corruption of high-ranking Australian government officials (even though I attributed 18M USD, part of the criminal assets, to the Australian government's treasury), is confirmed to be a beggar due to the level of public violence of the Australian government, it is only a matter of time before the hidden robbery of the Australian government spreads to other Asian countries.

I am a person with a lot of resentment and no money. If the Australian Attorney General and the banking supervision bureau collude to kill me, what do you think will happen to your country in the medium to long term?

If you think that the Australian government will just take money and get away with it, as it did with many Asians, you will realize over time that the Australian government made a big mistake in judging the situation.

If the Australian government believes in God, even if I am not the 'David who ultimately cut off Goliath's head', I am either that David's father or an important advisor to that David in the future.

If the Australian government does not believe in God (in its heart), then I am not the 'Star of Asia', but I am the father of the 'Star of Asia' or an important advisor to create the 'Star of Asia'.

So far, Asia has not had a strong basis for uniting to create an 'Asian star' in many aspects, especially in logical terms.

However, as I watched Australia's nightmare unfold in various Asian countries, I indirectly confirmed that the Australian government, which is close to Asia, has a very weak partner perspective.

I have long thought that at some point there would come a point where Korea, Japan and Taiwan would begin to unite to create an 'Star of Asia' using 'semiconductors' as a medium.

However, the relationship between the invaders and the invaded during World War II is still remembered by the older generation, and such attempts have rarely been made even under the surface.

I judged that very unpredictable uncertainties await the coming years around 2030, and I discussed this in my book, 'A Great Economic Crisis Is Coming in the Next 10 Years.'

The fact that the Australian government was revealed to be extorting Asia using 'arbitrary standards', ignoring international law, just as it did to me, and that the scale of bribery and corruption among high-ranking Australian government officials was also enormous, also means that the amount of money extorted from Asia is much larger than expected.

I offer the following message of stern warning to the Australian government:

 'Don't kill Dong-hee Jeong, who was the first to report large-scale bribery and corruption among high-ranking Australian government officials and transferred 18 million USD to the Australian government's treasury!'

Otherwise, the price your Australian government will have to endure around 2030 will be beyond imagination.

ⓑ Scenario B: If the Attorney General of Western Australia saves Zheng Dong-hee on March 10, 2025

My financial institution is a Brookfield affiliated company and is one of Brookfield's 26 affiliates registered with ASIC.

Headquartered in Canada, Brookfield Corporation operates as a global asset management firm specializing in renewable power, real estate, infrastructure, private equity and credit. Brookfield Asset Management, the flagship company, is positioned as a leading global alternative asset management company with assets under management exceeding US$1 trillion, and its main investment areas are real estate and renewable energy infrastructure.

Brookfield South Korea was established only in April 2019. It was established 120 years later than the Canadian headquarters of Brookfield, which was established in 1899.

Nevertheless, since then, many cases of Brookfield in Australia have been delayed compared to Korea.

In 2023, Brookfield Asset Management purchased the Cheongna Logistics Center in Incheon with a total floor area of ​​430,000 m2, the largest in Korea, for 659 billion won. (Coupang leases 80% of the logistics center.)

Centennial and joint-venture partner Brookfield Real Estate Secondaries have spent about $163 million of its $700 million fund to pick up two prime industrial and logistics assets in Sydney on October 23.

Another example is that in 2025 Brookfield sells Sydney Logistics Estate after it was built. The purchase period for this land is In 2023.

Sydney-based Brookfield Multiplex was founded in 1962. In January 2008, Multiplex became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. The latter period alone is more than 11 years ahead of Brookfield South Korea's founding year.

The timing of the purchase of Brookfield real estate in Sydney is later than when Brookfield purchased this logistics center, the largest in Korea (130,000 pyeong), through a pre-purchase agreement at the end of 2022.

Although Korea is a very small country compared to Australia and shows much lower figures than Australia in terms of per capita GDP, in terms of total GDP, it has been ranked similar to Australia for several years, and Brookfield South Korea's asset management scale is a whopping $1 trillion.

Brookfield Asset Management, which also shows a high affinity with Australia, is headquartered in Toronto and has branches in New York, London, Rio de Janeiro, and Sydney. While American or European investment banks have their Asian headquarters in Singapore, Hong Kong, or Shanghai, Brookfield has its Asian headquarters in Sydney.

However, there are mixed opinions as to whether Brookfield, which has its Asian headquarters in Sydney, actually serves as an Asia desk as well as Sydney's own Brookfield building.

Why is that so?

This is because Australia has too many of its own closed rules that deviate from international standards, especially in the financial sector, compared to Singapore, Hong Kong or Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul, which have other Asian headquarters.

In particular, the implementation of the 10% Value Added Business Deposit for Australian outflow funds exceeding $1 million, which was created under the leadership of The Banking Supervision Bureau from 2024, made very little effort to explain it to Australians and Asian citizens before implementation, and caused many sacrifices for people like me who did not know about this in the early stages of implementation.

A characteristic of Asian financial cities is that other Asian countries provide sufficient notice in advance of the implementation of the system, which usually applies to foreigners as well as local citizens, and that a few special provisions are actually applied in the early stages of implementation rather than unilaterally applying overly strict regulations.

On the other hand, in Australia, the financial authorities for the banking supervision bureau are taking a very tight stance in this field, and it is estimated that as of 2024, Asian businesspeople who are sober are strongly preferring European and American investment banks with Asian desks in Singapore and Hong Kong rather than Brookfield, which has an Asian desk in Sydney.

In particular, in October 2024, the fine I paid while using an Australian financial institution was brought up again at the very end of the trial conclusion process after winning a civil suit in a completely different case, and the case of applying double punishment to me is a 'very internationally shameful shame' that completely denies the common sense based on very basic international law among Asian business people.

If the Attorney General of Western Australia saves Chung Dong-hee on March 10, 2025, all these mistakes or 'the Australian government's brutality of public power that goes against international standards' will give Sydney and other countries the last chance to attempt to change the trend in the future to actually serve as an Asia desk.

I hope that the Australian government should now face the fact that Brookfield South Korea's incredible asset management scale, which did not give it any role as an Asian headquarters compared to Brookfield, which has its Asian headquarters in Sydney, is possible thanks to the pro-international standard financial environment that is several times ahead of Sydney in terms of international standards, even though Korea is not an English-speaking environment.

There is a saying that the difference between a genius and an idiot is just a page of paper.

It is no longer an open secret that too many disputes arise to Korean due to investment in Australia.

Everyone tells me I'm crazy.

For the past year or so, I thought that Australia naturally had an international standard financial environment that the top OECD countries had, but (from my perspective as someone who has done a lot of trade with Indonesia and visited Surabaya, Indonesia more than five times), it is shocking to see that the international standard financial environment lags behind that of Indonesia.

At the very least, the Australian people and the Australian government chose 'ⓑ Scenario B: If the Attorney General of Western Australia saves Zheng Dong-hee on March 10, 2025', showing at least some conscience that Australia is no longer a country that turns Asians into beggars due to its own closed, unprincipled policy that runs counter to international law.

Then, it is expected that Sydney, Perth, etc. will actually make a lot of progress in the future, especially in the financial aspect.

(※ Attorney General WA, Hon John Quigley(Address: 11th Floor, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, WEST PERTH WA 6005 / Telephone: 61 8 6552 6800 / Email:Minister.Quigley@dpc.wa.gov.au)

The fees I have already paid during the course of my trial closing proceedings from November 2024 to Mar 10, 2025 are as follows.

① The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$23,600 for handling the case (Paid on November 22, 2024)

② The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$25,860 for closing the case (Paid on November 22, 2024)

③ US$6,000 for defreezing fees and remittance fees of the Banking Supervision Bureau (Paid on November 22, 2024)

④ The trial plaintiff paid the trial defendant the exchange rate difference of 258,633 USD. (Paid at 24th Dec 2024)

⑤ The Ministry of Justice needs to charge US$12,800 for an execution fee (Paid on December 24th, 2024)

⑥ the freezing procedure fee of US$ 189,823 of the Banking Supervision Bureau (Paid on 17th January 2025)

⑦ the General Administration of Finance remitted US$ 38,960 to Stamp charge (Paid on 17th January 2025)

⑧ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 12,800 US dollars for an execution fee, again (Paid on 17th January 2025)

⑨ the Ministry of Justice needs to charge 5,780 US dollars for a certificate fee (Paid on 17th January 2025)

⑩ pay the late payment fee of 108,570 dollars to the banking supervision bureau (Paid on 20th Feb 2025)

⑪ pay an 15days extension fee of 53,800 US dollars (Paid on 20th Feb 2025)

⑫ US$ 62,630 has been included in the reduction of of remittance fee to the banking supervision bureau(Paid on 20th Feb 2025)

⑬ pay 50,000 US dollars of remittance fee to the banking supervision bureau(Paid on 7th Mar 2025)

⑭ pay an 3 days extension fee of 12,800 US dollars (Paid on 7th Mar 2025)

⑮ pay an 3 days extension fee of 12,800 + 3 times posponed penalty fee 5,000 US dollars (Paid on 10th Mar 2025)

(still, needs to pay US$ 124,648 remittance fee to the banking supervision bureau before March 13)

Zheng, Donghee, 8210-9170-7*** (정동희, 鄭東熙, Passport number M85736***, stockid1@gmail.com, stockid3@daum.net, Seoul, Korea)