Re: 산화질소 합성효소(nos) 조절과 기능!!

[문형철]

Eur Heart J

. 2011 Sep 1;33(7):829–837. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304

Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function

Ulrich Förstermann 1,*, William C Sessa 2

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

PMCID: PMC3345541  PMID: 21890489

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO), the smallest signalling molecule known, is produced by three isoforms of NO synthase (NOS; EC 1.14.13.39). They all utilize l-arginine and molecular oxygen as substrates and require the cofactors reduced nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), flavin mononucleotide (FMN), and (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). All NOS bind calmodulin and contain haem. Neuronal NOS (nNOS, NOS I) is constitutively expressed in central and peripheral neurons and some other cell types. Its functions include synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system (CNS), central regulation of blood pressure, smooth muscle relaxation, and vasodilatation via peripheral nitrergic nerves.

Nitrergic nerves are of particular importance in the relaxation of corpus cavernosum and penile erection. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil) require at least a residual nNOS activity for their action. Inducible NOS (NOS II) can be expressed in many cell types in response to lipopolysaccharide, cytokines, or other agents. Inducible NOS generates large amounts of NO that have cytostatic effects on parasitic target cells. Inducible NOS contributes to the pathophysiology of inflammatory diseases and septic shock. Endothelial NOS (eNOS, NOS III) is mostly expressed in endothelial cells. It keeps blood vessels dilated, controls blood pressure, and has numerous other vasoprotective and anti-atherosclerotic effects. Many cardiovascular risk factors lead to oxidative stress, eNOS uncoupling, and endothelial dysfunction in the vasculature. Pharmacologically, vascular oxidative stress can be reduced and eNOS functionality restored with renin- and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors, with angiotensin receptor blockers, and with statins.

요약

산화질소(NO)는 

알려진 가장 작은 신호 전달 분자로, 

NO 합성효소(NOS; EC 1.14.13.39)의 세 가지 이소형에 의해 생성됩니다. 

 the smallest signalling molecule

이들은 모두 

l-아르기닌과 분자 산소를 기질로 활용하며, 

보조인자인 환원형 니코틴아미드-아데닌-디뉴클레오티드 포스페이트(NADPH), 

플라빈 아데닌 디뉴클레오티드(FAD), 

플라빈 모노뉴클레오티드(FMN), 

(6R-)5,6,7,8-테트라하이드로비오테린(BH4)을 필요로 합니다. 

모든 NOS는 

칼모둘린과 결합하고, 

헴을 함유하고 있습니다. 

신경원 NOS(nNOS, NOS I)는 

중추 및 말초 신경과 일부 다른 세포 유형에서 구성적으로 발현됩니다. 

Neuronal NOS

그 기능에는 

중추 신경계(CNS)의 시냅스 가소성, 

혈압의 중추 조절, 

평활근 이완, 

말초 신경에 의한 혈관 확장이 포함됩니다. 

nitrergic 신경은

해면체와 음경 발기의 이완에 특히 중요합니다.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6515552/

니트로엔릭 장 신경세포는 장 연동 운동의 하강 억제 반사의 핵심 요소이기 때문에, 이 신경세포의 손실이나 손상은 전 세계적으로 환자들이 겪는 위장 운동 장애의 발생에 기여할 수 있습니다. 신경병증에 대한 니트로엔릭 장 신경세포의 취약성이 엄격하게 지역 특이적이며, 두 개의 주요 장 신경총이 서로 다른 니트로엔릭 신경세포 손상을 나타낸다는 증거가 축적되고 있습니다. 질소 산화 효소 하위 집단의 비율과 장내 신경 세포의 총 수에 변화가 있다는 것은 조사된 장 부분에서 신경 화학적 특성의 변화 또는 신경 세포의 사멸이 발생한다는 것을 시사합니다. 이 리뷰는 위장 부위 및/또는 신경총 의존적 병리학적 변화, 산화질소 합성효소(NOS)를 포함하는 신경 세포의 수, NO 방출, 다양한 NOS 이소형질의 세포 및 세포 내 발현을 요약하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 또한, 제1형 당뇨병, 만성 알코올 중독, 장 염증 또는 허혈과 같은 다양한 질병의 배경에 있는 니트로글리세린 경로와 관련된 일부 기본 메커니즘에 대해서도 논의할 것입니다.

포스포디에스터라아제 5 억제제(실데나필, 바르데나필, 타다라필)는

작용을 위해 최소한의 잔류 nNOS 활동이 필요합니다.

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors

유도성 NOS(NOS II)는

리포폴리사카라이드,

사이토카인 또는 기타 작용제에 반응하여

많은 세포 유형에서 발현될 수 있습니다.

유도성 NOS는

기생 대상 세포에 세포증식 억제 효과가 있는 다량의 NO를 생성합니다.

유도성 NOS는

염증성 질환과 패혈성 쇼크의 병태 생리학에 기여합니다.

내피 NOS(eNOS, NOS III)는

주로 내피 세포에서 발현됩니다.

이 물질은

혈관을 확장된 상태로 유지하고,

혈압을 조절하며,

그 밖의 수많은 혈관 보호 및 항 동맥경화 효과를 가지고 있습니다.

많은 심혈관 위험 요인이

산화 스트레스,

eNOS 분리,

혈관 내피 기능 장애를 유발합니다.

약리학적으로,

레닌-안지오텐신 전환 효소 억제제,

안지오텐신 수용체 차단제,

스타틴을 사용하면 혈

관 산화 스트레스를 줄이고 eNOS 기능을 회복할 수 있습니다.

Keywords: (6R-)5,6,7,8-Tetrahydrobiopterin; l-Arginine; Asymmetric dimethyl-l-arginine; NADPH oxidase; Peroxynitrite

Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO) is an unorthodox messenger molecule, which has numerous molecular targets. NO controls servoregulatory functions such as neurotransmission1,2 or vascular tone3,4 (by stimulating NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase), regulates gene transcription5,6 and mRNA translation (e.g. by binding to iron-responsive elements),7,8 and produces post-translational modifications of proteins (e.g. by ADP ribosylation).9,10 An important mode of inactivation of NO is its reaction with superoxide anion (O2−•) to form the potent oxidant peroxynitrite (ONOO−). This compound can cause oxidative damage, nitration, and S-nitrosylation of biomolecules including proteins, lipids, and DNA.11,12 Nitrosative stress by ONOO− has been implicated in DNA single-strand breakage, followed by poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) activation.13

In mammals, NO can be generated by three different isoforms of the enzyme NO synthase (NOS; l-arginine, NADPH:oxygen oxidoreductases, NO forming; EC 1.14.13.39). The isozymes are referred to as neuronal ‘n’NOS (or NOS I), inducible ‘i’NOS (or NOS II), and endothelial ‘e’NOS (or NOS III) (Figure 1). This review will cover all three isoforms. However, a focus of the article will be on eNOS and functions of NO in the cardiovascular system.

소개

산화질소(NO)는

수많은 분자 표적을 가진 비정형 메신저 분자입니다.

NO는

신경 전달1,2 또는

혈관 긴장3,4(NO에 민감한 구아닐릴 사이클라제를 자극함으로써)과 같은 조절 기능을 조절하고,

유전자 전사5,6 및 mRNA 번역(예: 철에 반응하는 요소에 결합함으로써)을 조절하며,7,8

단백질의 번역 후 변형(예: ADP 리보실화)을 생성합니다.9,10

neurotransmission1,2 or vascular tone3,4 (by stimulating NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase), regulates gene transcription5,6 and mRNA translation (e.g. by binding to iron-responsive elements),7,8 and produces post-translational modifications of proteins (e.g. by ADP ribosylation)

NO의 비활성화의 중요한 방식은

슈퍼옥사이드 음이온(O2- -•) 강력한 산화제인

과산화질소(ONOO-)를 형성합니다.

이 화합물은

단백질,

지질,

DNA를 포함한 생체 분자의 산화 손상,

질화, S-니트로실화를 유발할 수 있습니다.11,12

ONOO-에 의한 니트로사이드 스트레스는

DNA 단일 가닥 파손과 그 이후의 폴리-ADP-리보스 폴리머라제(PARP) 활성화와

관련이 있습니다.13

포유류에서 NO는

효소 NO 합성효소(NOS; l-arginine, NADPH:oxygen oxidoreductases, NO forming; EC 1.14.13.39)의

세 가지 다른 이소효소에 의해 생성될 수 있습니다.

이소효소는

신경성 'n'NOS(또는 NOS I),

유도성 'i'NOS(또는 NOS II),

내피성 'e'NOS(또는 NOS III)로 불립니다(그림 1).

이 리뷰는 세 가지 이소폼 모두를 다룹니다.

그러나 이 글의 초점은

eNOS와 심혈관계에서 NO의 기능에 맞춰질 것입니다.

Figure 1.

Important functions of the different NOS isoforms.

(Top panel) Neuronal NOS is expressed in specific neurons of the central nervous system (CNS). It has been implicated in synaptic plasticity (i.e. phenomena such a long-term potentiation and long-term inhibition). These phenomena are involved in learning and memory formation. Neuronal NOS-derived NO also participates in central control of blood pressure. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS), neuronal NOS-derived NO acts as an atypical neurotransmitter, which mediates relaxing components of gut peristalsis, vasodilation, and penile erection. At least a minimal stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase in corpus cavernosum by nNOS-derived NO, and the subsequent formation of small amounts of cyclic GMP, is a prerequisite for the pro-erectile effects of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors sildenafil (Viagra®), vardenafil (Levitra®), and tadalafil (Cialis®). (Middle panel) Inducible NOS expression‎ can be induced by cytokines and other agents in almost any cell type. This had initially been shown for macrophages (MΦ). The induction of inducible NOS in MΦ is essential for the control of intracellular bacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis156,157 or the parasite Leishmania.158,159 However, inducible NOS is also up-regulated in various types of inflammatory disease, and the NO generated by the enzyme mediates various symptoms of inflammation.160,161 Finally, inducible NOS-derived NO is the predominant mediator of vasodilation and fall in blood pressure seen in septic shock.161 In fact, mice with a disrupted inducible NOS gene are protected from many symptoms of septic shock.159 (Bottom panel) Endothelial NOS-derived NO is a physiological vasodilator, but can also convey vasoprotection in several ways. NO released towards the vascular lumen is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and adhesion to the vascular wall. Besides protection from thrombosis, this also prevents the release of platelet-derived growth factors that stimulate smooth muscle proliferation and its production of matrix molecules. Endothelial NO also controls the expression‎ of genes involved in atherogenesis. NO decreases the expression‎ of chemoattractant protein MCP-1 and of a number of surface adhesion molecules, thereby preventing leucocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium and leucocyte migration into the vascular wall. This offers protection against early phases of atherogenesis. Also the decreased endothelial permeability, the reduced influx of lipoproteins into the vascular wall and the inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation may contribute to the anti-atherogenic properties of endothelial NOS-derived NO. Finally, NO has been shown to inhibit DNA synthesis, mitogenesis, and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells as well as smooth muscle cell migration, thereby protecting against a later phase of atherogenesis. Based on the combination of those effects, NO produced in endothelial cells can be considered an anti-atherosclerotic principle (for review, see Li and Förstermann162).

다양한 NOS 이소효소의 중요한 기능.

(상단 패널)

neuronal NOS는

중추신경계(CNS)의 특정 신경세포에서 발현됩니다.

이 효소는

시냅스 가소성(즉, 장기 강화 및 장기 억제 같은 현상)과 관련이 있습니다.

이러한 현상은 학습과 기억 형성에 관여합니다.

neuronal NOS에서 유래된 NO는

또한 혈압의 중심 조절에 관여합니다.

말초신경계(PNS)에서, 신경세포의 NOS에서 유래된 NO는

비정형 신경전달물질의 역할을 하며,

장 연동 운동, 혈관 확장, 음경 발기의 이완 성분을 매개합니다.

최소한 최소한의 자극이 있어야 합니다.

nNOS에서 유래된 NO에 의해 해면체에 있는 가용성 구아닐릴 사이클라제의 자극이 일어나고,

그 후 소량의 사이클릭 GMP가 형성되는 것이,

포스포디에스터라아제 5 억제제인

실데나필(비아그라®), 바르데나필(레비트라®), 타다라필(시알리스®)의 발기 촉진 효과를

위한 전제 조건입니다.

(중간 패널)

inducible NOS 발현은

거의 모든 세포 유형에서 사이토카인과 다른 작용제에 의해 유도될 수 있습니다.

이것은 처음에 대식세포(MΦ)에서 나타났습니다.

MΦ에서 유도성 NOS의 유도는

Mycobacterium tuberculosis156,157 또는 기생충 Leishmania와 같은

세포 내 박테리아의 통제에 필수적입니다158,159

그러나,

유도성 NOS는

다양한 유형의 염증성 질환에서 상향 조절되며,

이 효소에 의해 생성된 NO는 다양한 염증 증상을 매개합니다160,161

마지막으로,

유도성 NOS에서 유래된 NO는

혈관 확장과 수축의 주요 매개체입니다.

패혈성 쇼크에서 나타나는 혈압.161 실제로,

유도성 NOS 유전자가 파괴된 생쥐는

패혈성 쇼크의 여러 증상을 예방할 수 있습니다.159

(하단 패널)

내피 NOS-유래 NO는

생리적 혈관 확장제이지만,

여러 가지 방법으로 혈관 보호 작용을 할 수 있습니다.

혈관 내강으로 방출되는 NO는

혈소판 응집과 혈관벽에 대한 접착을 강력하게 억제합니다.

혈전증으로부터 보호하는 것 외에도,

이 물질은 평활근 증식과 매트릭스 분자 생성을 자극하는 혈소판 유래 성장 인자의 방출을 방지합니다.

내피 NO는 또한 죽상경화증과 관련된 유전자의 발현을 조절합니다.

NO는

화학유인단백질 MCP-1과 여러 표면 부착 분자의 발현을 감소시켜

백혈구가 혈관 내피에 부착되는 것을 방지하고

백혈구가 혈관벽으로 이동하는 것을 방지합니다.

이것은 죽상경화증의 초기 단계에 대한 보호를 제공합니다.

또한 내피 투과성 감소,

혈관벽으로의 지단백질 유입 감소,

저밀도 지단백질 산화 억제는

내피 NOS에서 유래된 NO의 항죽상경화성 특성에 기여할 수 있습니다.

마지막으로,

NO는

DNA 합성,

미토제네시스,

혈관 평활근 세포의 증식 및 평활근 세포의 이동을 억제함으로써,

이후의 죽상경화증 발생을 예방하는 것으로 나타났습니다.

이러한 효과의 조합을 바탕으로,

내피세포에서 생성된 NO는

항죽상경화 작용의 원리로 간주될 수 있습니다

(리(Li)와 포어스테르만(Förstermann)의 연구 참고162).

Mechanisms of nitric oxide synthesis

All isoforms of NOS utilize l-arginine as the substrate, and molecular oxygen and reduced nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) as co-substrates. Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), flavin mononucleotide (FMN), and (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-l-biopterin (BH4) are cofactors of all isozymes. All NOS proteins are homodimers (Figure 2).

A functional NOS transfers electrons from NADPH, via the flavins FAD and FMN in the carboxy-terminal reductase domain, to the haem in the amino-terminal oxygenase domain. The oxygenase domain also binds the essential cofactor BH4, molecular oxygen, and the substrate l-arginine14,15 (Figure 2). At the haem site, the electrons are used to reduce and activate O2 and to oxidize l-arginine to l-citrulline and NO (Figure 2). Sequences located near the cysteine ligand of the haem are also apparently involved in l-arginine and BH4 binding.16 In order to synthesize NO, the NOS enzyme goes through two steps. In a first step, NOS hydroxylates l-arginine to Nω-hydroxy-l-arginine (which remains largely bound to the enzyme). In a second step, NOS oxidizes Nω-hydroxy-l-arginine to l-citrulline and NO.17,18 All isoforms of NOS bind calmodulin (Figure 2). In nNOS and eNOS, calmodulin binding is brought about by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ (half-maximal activity between 200 and 400 nM). When calmodulin affinity to NOS increases, it facilitates the flow of electrons from NADPH in the reductase domain to the haem in the oxygenase domain. In inducible NOS (iNOS), calmodulin already binds at extremely low intracellular Ca2+ concentrations (below 40 nM) due to a different amino acid structure of the calmodulin-binding site.19,20 All NOS proteins contain a zinc–thiolate cluster formed by a zinc ion that is tetrahedrally coordinated to two CysXXXXCys motifs (one contributed by each monomer) at the NOS dimer interface.21–23 Zinc in NOS has a structural rather than a catalytic function.21

산화질소 합성 메커니즘

NOS의 모든 이소효소는

l-아르기닌을 기질로 사용하고,

분자 산소와 환원된 니코틴아미드-아데닌-디뉴클레오티드 포스페이트(NADPH)를

보조 기질로 사용합니다.

플라빈 아데닌 디뉴클레오티드(FAD),

플라빈 모노뉴클레오티드(FMN),

(6R-)5,6,7,8-테트라하이드로-l-비오프테린(BH4)은

모든 이소효소의 보조 인자입니다.

모든 NOS 단백질은

동종 이량체입니다(그림 2).

기능성 NOS는

카복시 말단 환원효소 도메인에 있는 플라빈 FAD와 FMN을 통해

NADPH로부터 전자를 아미노 말단 산소화 효소 도메인에 있는

헴으로 전달합니다.

산소화 효소 도메인은

또한 필수 보조인자 BH4, 분자 산소,

그리고 기질 l-아르기닌14,15를 결합합니다(그림 2).

헤모 사이트에서,

전자는 O2를 환원 및 활성화하고 l-아르기닌을 l-시트룰린과 NO로

산화시키는 데 사용됩니다(그림 2).

헤모의 시스테인 리간드 근처에 위치한 서열도 l-아르기닌과 BH4 결합에 관여하는 것으로 보입니다.16

NO를 합성하기 위해

NOS 효소는

두 단계를 거칩니다.

첫 번째 단계에서

NOS는

l-아르기닌을 Nω-하이드록시-l-아르기닌(효소에 대부분 결합된 상태로 남아 있음)으로

하이드록시화합니다.

두 번째 단계에서

NOS는

Nω-하이드록시-l-아르기닌을 l-시트룰린과 NO로 산화합니다.17,18

NOS의 모든 이소형은

칼모둘린을 결합합니다(그림 2).

nNOS와 eNOS에서,

칼모둘린 결합은 세포 내 Ca2+의 증가에 의해 발생합니다(200~400nM 사이의 반-최대 활성).

NOS에 대한 칼모둘린 친화성이 증가하면,

환원효소 영역의 NADPH에서 산소화효소 영역의 헴으로 전자가 흐르기 쉽습니다.

유도성 NOS(iNOS)에서,

칼모둘린 결합 부위의 다른 아미노산 구조 때문에

칼모둘린이 이미 극도로 낮은 세포 내 Ca2+ 농도(40nM 이하)에서 결합합니다.19,20

모든 NOS 단백질은

NOS 이량체 인터페이스에서 2개의 CysXXXXCys 모티프(각 모노머가 하나씩 기여)에

사면체 협응력을 갖는 아연 이온에 의해 형성된

아연-티올레이트 클러스터를 포함합니다.21-23

Z NOS의 inc는

촉매적 기능보다는 구조적 기능을 가지고 있습니다.21

Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function - PMC

Figure 2.

Structure and catalytic mechanisms of functional NOS.

(A) NOS monomers are capable of transferring electrons from reduced nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), to flavin-adenine-dinucleotide (FAD) and flavin-mononucleotide (FMN) and have a limited capacity to reduce molecular oxygen to superoxide (O2−•).18,163,164 Monomers and isolated reductase domains can bind calmodulin (CaM), which enhances electron transfer within the reductase domain.165 NOS monomers are unable to bind the cofactor (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) or the substrate l-arginine and cannot catalyze NO production.163,166 

(B) In the presence of haem, NOS can form a functional dimer.163,166 Haem is essential for the interdomain electron transfer from the flavins to the haem of the opposite monomer.165,167 Due to differences in the calmodulin-binding domain, elevated Ca2+ is required for calmodulin binding (and thus catalytic activity) in nNOS and eNOS, whereas calmodulin binds to inducible NOS with high affinity even in the absence of Ca2+. When sufficient substrate l-arginine (l-Arg) and cofactor BH4 are present, intact NOS dimers couple their haem and O2 reduction to the synthesis of NO (fully functional NOS). l-Citrulline (l-Cit) is formed as the byproduct. For clarity, the flow of electrons is only shown from the reductase domain of one monomer to the oxygenase domain of the other monomer. NOS enzymes perform two separate oxidation steps, one to form Nω-hydroxy-l-arginine and a second to convert this intermediate to NO.18 All NOS isoforms contain a zinc ion (Zn) coordinated in a tetrahedral conformation with pairs of CXXXXC motifs at the dimer interface. This site is of major importance for the binding of BH4 and l-arginine. Electron transfer from the reductase domain (*) enables NOS ferric (Fe3+) haem to bind O2 and form a ferrous (Fe2+)-dioxy species. This species may receive a second electron (**) preferentially from BH4 or from the reductase domain. The nature of the resulting oxidized BH4 has been identified as the trihydrobiopterin radical (BH3•) or the trihydropterin radical cation protonated at N5 (BH3•H+). The BH3• radical (or radical cation) can be recycled to BH4 by the NOS itself (using an electron supplied by the flavins). Alternatively, there is evidence that reducing agents such as ascorbic acid (AscH, which is present in cells in millimolar concentrations) can reduce the BH3• radical back to BH4103 (Asc·, ascorbate radical).

기능적 NOS의 구조와 촉매 메커니즘.

(A) NOS 단량체는 환원된 니코틴아미드-아데닌-디뉴클레오티드 포스페이트(NADPH)에서 플라빈-아데닌-디뉴클레오티드(FAD)와 플라빈-모노뉴클레오티드(FMN)로 전자를 전달할 수 있으며, 분자 산소를 슈퍼옥사이드(O2−•)로 환원하는 능력이 제한적입니다.18,163,164 단량체와 분리된 환원효소 도메인은 칼모둘린(CaM)에 결합할 수 있으며, 이는 환원효소 도메인 내의 전자 전달.165 NOS 단량체는 보조인자(6R-)5,6,7,8-테트라하이드로비오테린(BH4) 또는 기질인 l-아르기닌을 결합할 수 없고, NO 생성을 촉매할 수 없습니다.163,166

(B) haem이 존재하는 경우, NOS는 기능적 이량체를 형성할 수 있습니다.163,166 Haem은 플라빈에서 반대쪽 단량체의 haem으로의 도메인 간 전자 전달에 필수적입니다.165,167 칼모둘린 결합 도메인의 차이로 인해, nNOS와 eNOS에서 칼모둘린 결합(그리고 촉매 활동)을 위해서는 Ca2+의 증가가 필요하지만, 칼모둘린은 유도성 NOS에 높은 Ca2+가 없어도 친화력이 존재합니다. 충분한 기질인 l-아르기닌(l-Arg)과 보조인자 BH4가 존재할 때, 온전한 NOS 이량체는 헤모글로빈과 산소 환원을 결합하여 NO를 합성합니다(완전히 기능하는 NOS). l-시트룰린(l-Cit)은 부산물로 형성됩니다. 명확성을 위해, 전자의 흐름은 한 모노머의 환원효소 영역에서 다른 모노머의 산소화효소 영역으로만 표시됩니다. NOS 효소는 두 가지의 분리된 산화 단계를 수행합니다. 하나는 Nω-hydroxy-l-arginine을 형성하는 것이고, 다른 하나는 이 중간체를 NO로 전환하는 것입니다.18 모든 NOS 이소형은 이합체 경계면에서 CXXXXC 모티프 쌍과 함께 사면체 구조로 협응력을 갖는 아연 이온(Zn)을 포함합니다. 이 부위는 BH4와 l-arginine의 결합에 매우 중요합니다. 환원효소 도메인(*)에서 전자가 이동하면 NOS 제2철(Fe3+) 헤모글로빈이 산소와 결합하여 제1철(Fe2+) 이산화물 종을 형성할 수 있습니다. 이 종은 BH4 또는 환원효소 도메인으로부터 우선적으로 두 번째 전자를 받을 수 있습니다(**). 산화된 BH4의 성질은 트라이하이드로비오테린 라디칼(BH3•) 또는 N5에서 양성자화된 트라이하이드로프테린 라디칼 양이온(BH3•H+)으로 확인되었습니다. BH3• 라디칼(또는 라디칼 양이온)은 NOS 자체에 의해 플라빈이 공급하는 전자를 사용하여 BH4로 재활용될 수 있습니다. 또는, 아스코르브산(세포 내에 밀리몰 농도로 존재하는 AsCH)과 같은 환원제가 BH3• 라디칼을 BH4103(Asc·, 아스코르브산 라디칼)로 환원시킬 수 있다는 증거가 있습니다.

The NO formed by NOS can act on a number of target enzymes and proteins. The most important physiological signalling pathway stimulated by NO is the activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase and the generation of cyclic GMP.3,4,24–26

NOS에 의해 형성된 NO는 여러 표적 효소와 단백질에 작용할 수 있습니다. NO에 의해 자극되는 가장 중요한 생리학적 신호 전달 경로는 수용성 구아닐릴 사이클라제의 활성화와 사이클릭 GMP의 생성입니다.3,4,24–26

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase

Neuronal NOS is constitutively expressed in specific neurons of the brain (Figure 1). Enzyme activity is regulated by Ca2+ and calmodulin. Brain nNOS is found in particulate and soluble forms in cells and the differential subcellular localization of nNOS may contribute to its diverse functions. Neuronal NOS contains a PDZ domain and can interact directly with the PDZ domains of other proteins. These interactions determine the subcellular distribution and the activity of the enzyme.27 In addition to brain tissue, nNOS has been identified by immunohistochemistry in the spinal cord, in the sympathetic ganglia and adrenal glands, in peripheral nitrergic nerves, in epithelial cells of various organs, in kidney macula densa cells, in pancreatic islet cells, and in the vascular smooth muscle.28 In mammalians, the largest source of nNOS in terms of tissue mass is the skeletal muscle.28,29

신경질산화물합성효소(Neuronal nitric oxide synthase)

신경질산화물합성효소(Neuronal NOS)는

뇌의 특정 신경세포에서

구성적으로 발현됩니다(그림 1).

효소 활성은

Ca2+와 칼모둘린에 의해 조절됩니다.

뇌의 nNOS는

세포에서 미립자 및 용해성 형태로 발견되며,

nNOS의 세포 내 위치가 다르면 다양한 기능에 기여할 수 있습니다.

신경질산화물합성효소(Neuronal NOS)는

PDZ 도메인을 포함하고 있으며,

다른 단백질의 PDZ 도메인과 직접 상호작용할 수 있습니다.

이러한 상호작용은

효소의 세포 내 분포와 활성을 결정합니다.27

뇌 조직 외에도,

nNOS는

척수, 교감 신경절과

부신,

말초 신경,

다양한 기관의 상피 세포,

신장 황반 세포,

췌장 섬세포,

혈관 평활근에서 면역조직화학검사를 통해 확인되었습니다.28

포유류에서 조직 질량 측면에서

nNOS의 가장 큰 공급원은

골격근육입니다. 28,29

Physiological functions of neuronal nitric oxide synthase

In the past years, an increasing number of reports have confirmed the significance of nNOS in a variety of synaptic signalling events. Neuronal NOS has been implicated in modulating physiological functions such as learning, memory, and neurogenesis.27 In the central nervous system (CNS), nNOS mediates long-term regulation of synaptic transmission (long-term potentiation, long-term inhibition),1,2,30,31 whereas there is no evidence for an involvement of nNOS-derived NO in acute neurotransmission (Figure 1). Retrograde communication across synaptic junctions is presumed to be involved in memory formation, and there is evidence that inhibitors of NOS impair learning and produce amnesia in animal models.32,33 There is also evidence that NO formed in the CNS by nNOS is involved in the central regulation of blood pressure34–36 (Figure 1). Blockade of nNOS activity in the medulla and hypothalamus causes systemic hypertension.37

In the periphery, many smooth muscle tissues are innervated by nitrergic nerves, i.e. nerves that contain nNOS and generate and release NO (Figure 1). Nitric oxide produced by nNOS in nitrergic nerves can be viewed as an unusual neurotransmitter that stimulates NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase in its effector cells, thereby decreasing the tone of various types of smooth muscle including blood vessels.28,38 The conventional notion that eNOS is mostly responsible for the regulation of vascular tone in the periphery (see later in this article) has been challenged by a human study with S-methyl-l-thiocitrulline (SMTC), a selective inhibitor of nNOS. S-Methyl-l-thiocitrulline reduces basal blood flow in the human forearm and in the coronary circulation. This effect can be reversed by l-arginine. Interestingly, SMTC does not affect classical eNOS-mediated vasodilatation in response to acetylcholine, substance P, or fluid shear stress. These data are coherent with the notion that nNOS plays an important role in the regulation of vascular tone, independent of effects of nNOS in the CNS. Thus, eNOS and nNOS may have distinct roles in the physiological regulation of human microvascular tone in vivo.39 Interestingly, vascular smooth muscle cells also express low levels of nNOS, which have been shown to maintain some degree of vasodilation, when the predominant eNOS becomes dysfunctional.40

By mediating the relaxation of the corpus cavernosum smooth muscle, nNOS-containing nitrergic nerves are responsible for penile erection41,42 (Figure 1). Also in the corpus cavernosum, NO-induced smooth muscle relaxation is mediated by cyclic GMP.42 Cyclic GMP is degraded by phosphodiesterases. The predominant isoform in the corpus cavernosum is isoform 5.43 Thus, a residual nNOS activity is essential for the proerectile effect of selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors such as sildenafil (Viagra®), vardenafil (Levitra®), and tadalafil (Cialis®).43,44 Interestingly, because phosphodiesterase 5 is also significantly expressed in pulmonary arteries, sildenafil (under the trade name Revatio®) and tadalafil (under the trade name Adcirca®) have also been approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in pathophysiology

Abnormal NO signalling is likely to contribute to a variety of neurodegenerative pathologies such as excitotoxicity following stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's diseases.45 Hyperactive nNOS, stimulated by massive Ca2+ influx into neuronal cells, has been implicated in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated neuronal death in cerebrovascular stroke.46 Under those conditions, NO can contribute to excitotoxicity, probably via peroxynitrite activation of PARP and/or mitochondrial permeability transition. High levels of NO can also produce energy depletion, due to inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and inhibition of glycolysis.47

Some disturbances of smooth muscle tone within the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. gastro-oesophageal reflux disease) may also be related to an overproduction of NO by nNOS in peripheral nitrergic nerves.48,49

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

Inducible NOS is not usually expressed in cells, but its expression‎ can be induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide, cytokines, and other agents. Although primarily identified in macrophages (Figure 1), expression‎ of the enzyme can be stimulated in virtually any cell or tissue, provided that the appropriate inducing agents have been identified.28,38 Once expressed, iNOS is constantly active and not regulated by intracellular Ca2+ concentrations.

Physiological functions of inducible nitric oxide synthase

Inducible NOS, when induced in macrophages, produces large amounts of NO, which represent a major cytotoxic principle of those cells.50 Due to its affinity to protein-bound iron, NO can inhibit key enzymes that contain iron in their catalytic centres. These include iron–sulfur cluster-dependent enzymes (complexes I and II) involved in mitochondrial electron transport, ribonucleotide reductase (the rate-limiting enzyme in DNA replication), and cis-aconitase (a key enzyme in the citric acid cycle).50 In addition, higher concentrations of NO, as produced by induced macrophages, can directly interfere with the DNA of target cells and cause strand breaks and fragmentation.51,52 A combination of these effects is likely to form the basis of the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of NO on parasitic microorganisms and certain tumour cells (Figure 1). Interestingly, non-immune cells can also be induced with cytokines to release amounts of NO large enough to affect the neighbouring cells. Cytokine-activated endothelial cells, for example, have been shown to lyse tumour cells,53 and induced hepatocytes can use NO to kill malaria sporozoites.54 Inducible NOS activity is likely to be responsible for all of these effects.

Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase in pathophysiology

The high levels of NO produced by activated macrophages (and probably neutrophils and other cells) may not only be toxic to undesired microbes, parasites, or tumour cells, but—when released at the wrong site—may also harm healthy cells. In vivo, cell and tissue damage can be related to the NO radical itself or an interaction of NO with O2−• leading to the formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO−). The large majority of inflammatory and autoimmune lesions are characterized by an abundance of activated macrophages and neutrophils. Significant amounts of NO can be secreted by those cells, leading to damage of the surrounding tissue52,55 (Figure 1). Inducible NOS-derived NO is also likely to be involved in non-specific allograft rejection.56

Inflammatory neurodegeneration contributes to a number of brain pathologies. Mechanisms by which activated microglia and astrocytes kill neurons have been identified in cell culture. These mechanisms include the activation of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase in microglia and expression‎ of iNOS in glia. This combination produces apoptosis via ONOO− production. Inducible NOS-derived NO also synergizes with hypoxia to induce neuronal death because NO inhibits cytochrome oxidase. This can result in glutamate release and excitotoxicity57,58 (see the Role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in pathophysiology section on nNOS and excitotoxicity).

Lastly, excessive NO production by iNOS plays a crucial role in septic shock (Figure 1). This condition is characterized by massive arteriolar vasodilatation, hypotension, and microvascular damage. Bacterial endotoxins usually initiate the symptoms. A number of mediators such as platelet-activating factor, thromboxane A2, prostanoids, and cytokines such as interleukin-1, tumour necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ are elevated in septic shock and have been implicated in its pathophysiology. However, the fall in blood pressure is predominantly due to excess NO production by iNOS induced in the vascular wall.59,60

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Endothelial NOS is mostly expressed in endothelial cells (Figure 1). However, the isozyme has also been detected in cardiac myocytes, platelets, certain neurons of the brain, in syncytio-trophoblasts of the human placenta and in LLC-PK1 kidney tubular epithelial cells.28,38

Similar to nNOS, Ca2+-activated calmodulin is important for the regulation of eNOS activity. Endothelial NOS synthesizes NO in a pulsatile manner with eNOS activity markedly increasing when intracellular Ca2+ rises. Ca2+ induces the binding of calmodulin to the enzyme.20 However, several other proteins also interact with eNOS and regulate its activity. For example, heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) has been found associated with eNOS and serves as an allosteric modulator activating the enzyme61 and promoting eNOS (re)coupling62,63 (see later in the text). The fraction of eNOS that is localized in caveolae64 can interact with the caveolae coat protein, caveolin-1. Caveolin-1 is a tonic inhibitor of eNOS activity. This concept has been proven genetically because blood vessels from caveolin-1-deficient mice show enhanced endothelium-dependent relaxations.65 Mechanistically, the recruitment of calmodulin and hsp90 to eNOS can displace caveolin-1 from the enzyme thereby leading to enzyme activation.66

However, eNOS can also be activated by stimuli that do not produce sustained increases in intracellular Ca2+, but still induce a long-lasting release of NO. The best established such stimulus is fluid shear stress. This activation is mediated by phosphorylation of the enzyme.67,68 The eNOS protein can be phosphorylated on several serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), and tyrosine (Tyr) residues. Phosphorylation of Ser1177 stimulates the flux of electrons within the reductase domain, increases the Ca2+ sensitivity of the enzyme, and represents an additional and independent mechanism of eNOS activation.68,69 Oestrogen and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) phosphorylate eNOS mainly via the Ser/Thr kinase Akt, insulin probably activates both Akt and the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), the bradykinin-induced phosphorylation of Ser1177 is mediated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), and shear stress elicits phosphorylation mainly by activating protein kinase A (PKA) (Figure 3). Recent evidence using Akt1-deficient mice carrying knock-in mutations of the critical Akt1 phosphorylation site on eNOS has proven that kinase Akt1 is a critical regulator of eNOS function also in vivo.70 Ser1176 is the Akt1 phosphorylation site in the mouse that corresponds to Ser1177 in the human species. The phosphomimetic mutation Ser1176Asp rendered the enzyme constitutively active, whereas the mutation Ser1176Ala reduced enzyme activity.70 Thus, although all the kinases mentioned can regulate eNOS Ser1177 in vitro, Akt1 is the only kinase proven to regulate eNOS function in vivo.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Regulation of endothelial NOS activity by intracellular Ca2+ and phosphorylation. An increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to an enhanced binding of calmodulin (CaM) to the enzyme, which in turn displaces an auto-inhibitory loop and facilitates the flow of electrons from NADPH in the reductase domain to the haem in the oxygenase domain. Established functionally important phosphorylation sites in human endothelial NOS are Ser1177 and Thr495. In resting endothelial cells, Ser1177 is usually not phosphorylated. Phosphorylation is induced when the cells are exposed to oestrogens, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin, bradykinin or fluid shear stress. The kinases responsible for phosphorylation (green hexagons) depend on the primary stimulus. Oestrogen and vascular endothelial growth factor elicit phosphorylation of Ser1177 by activating serine/threonine kinase Akt. So far, Akt1 is the only kinase proven to regulate endothelial NOS function in vivo (framed green hexagon). Insulin probably activates both Akt and the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), the bradykinin-induced phosphorylation of Ser1177 is mediated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), and shear stress leads to phosphorylation of endothelial NOS mainly via protein kinase A (PKA). Phosphorylation of the Ser1177 residue increases the flux of electrons through the reductase domain and thus enzyme activity. The Thr495 residue of human endothelial NOS tends to be constitutively phosphorylated in endothelial cells. Thr495 is a negative regulatory site, and its phosphorylation is associated with a decreased electron flux and enzyme activity. The constitutively active kinase that phosphorylates endothelial NOS Thr495 is most probably protein kinase C (PKC, yellow hexagon). Phosphorylation of Thr495 reduces endothelial NOS activity (yellow block arrow). The phosphatase that dephosphorylates Thr495 appears to be protein phosphatase1 (PP1, black flag with black block arrow).

Thr495 tends to be phosphorylated under non-stimulated conditions (most probably by protein kinase C). Phosphorylation of Thr495 is likely to interfere with the binding of calmodulin to the calmodulin-binding domain. In fact, dephosphorylation of Thr495 is associated with stimuli that elevate intracellular Ca2+ concentrations and increase eNOS activity. Substantially more calmodulin binds to eNOS when Thr495 is dephosphorylated.68 However, dephosphorylation of Thr495 has also been shown to favour eNOS uncoupling (see below).71

Other phosphorylation sites of human eNOS include Ser114, Ser633, Tyr81, and Tyr657 residues. Phosphorylation of these residues is an intensively studied area and may have important consequences for enzyme activity as recently reviewed.72

Physiological functions of endothelial nitric oxide synthaseVasodilation and inhibition of platelet aggregation and adhesion

Endothelial NOS appears to be a homeostatic regulator of numerous essential cardiovascular functions. Endothelial NOS-derived NO dilates all types of blood vessels by stimulating soluble guanylyl cyclase and increasing cyclic GMP in smooth muscle cells.3,4,73 Deletion of the eNOS gene leads to elevated blood pressure.74,75 Nitric oxide released towards the vascular lumen is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and adhesion to the vascular wall.76–78 Besides protection from thrombosis, this also prevents the release of platelet-derived growth factors that stimulate smooth muscle proliferation and its production of matrix molecules. Endothelial NOS is also critical for adaptive vascular remodelling to chronic changes in flow.79

Inhibition of leucocyte adhesion and vascular inflammation

Endothelial NO controls the expression‎ of genes involved in atherogenesis. Nitric oxide decreases the expression‎ of chemoattractant protein MCP-1.80 Nitric oxide can also inhibit leucocyte adhesion to the vessel wall by either interfering with the ability of the leucocyte adhesion molecule CD11/CD18 to bind to the endothelial cell surface or by suppressing CD11/CD18 expression‎ on leucocytes.81,82 Leucocyte adherence is an early event in the development of atherosclerosis, and therefore,

NO may protect against the onset of atherogenesis.

A disturbed integrity of the endothelial monolayer barrier can initiate proinflammatory events. Endothelium-derived NO prevents endothelial cell apoptosis induced by proinflammatory cytokines and proatherosclerotic factors including reactive oxygen species (ROS) and angiotensin II (AT). The suppression of apoptosis may also contribute to the antiinflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic effects of endothelium-derived NO.83

Control of vascular smooth muscle proliferation

Furthermore, NO has been shown to inhibit DNA synthesis, mitogenesis, and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells.84–87 These antiproliferative effects are likely to be mediated by cyclic GMP.84,85,88 The inhibition of platelet aggregation and adhesion protects smooth muscle from exposure to platelet-derived growth factor(s). Therefore, NO also prevents a later step in atherogenesis, fibrous plaque formation. Based on the combination of those effects, NO produced in endothelial cells can be considered an anti-atherosclerotic principle89 (Figure 1).

Stimulation of angiogenesis by endothellial nitric oxide synthase-derived NO

Endothelial NOS-derived NO plays a critical role in post-natal angiogenesis, mediating signals downstream of angiogenic factors. Recent findings in eNOS-deficient mice point to a novel and previously unrecognized role of NO in foetal lung development and lung morphogenesis. The lung phenotype of eNOS-deficient mice closely resembles alveolar capillary dysplasia in humans, a form of malignant pulmonary hypertension of the newborn that presents with defective lung vascular development and respiratory distress.90 Similarly, eNOS had been found to be critical for collateral formation and angiogenesis post-ischaemia.91 Furthermore, the positive effects of NO on endothelial cell survival are likely to also contribute to the pro-angiogenic effects of NO.83

Activation of endothelial progenitor cells by endothelial nitric oxide synthase-derived nitric oxide

Mice with a deleted eNOS gene show an impaired neovascularization. This was related to a defect in progenitor cell mobilization. Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells by VEGF is reduced in eNOS-deficient mice. In a model of hind-limb ischaemia in these mice, intravenous infusion of wild-type progenitor cells, but not bone marrow transplantation, can rescue the defective neovascularization. This suggests that mobilization of progenitor cells from the bone marrow is impaired in eNOS-deficient mice. Indeed, matrix metalloproteinase-9, which is required for stem cell mobilization, was reduced in the bone marrow of eNOS-deficient mice. Thus, eNOS expressed by bone marrow stromal cells influences recruitment of stem and progenitor cells. Reduced systemic NO bioactivity seen in ischaemic heart disease may therefore contribute to impaired neovascularization.92

Also in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, bone marrow mononuclear cells show a reduced neovascularization capacity in vivo. As mentioned above, NO plays an important role in neovascularization and NO bioavailability is typically reduced in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Pre-treatment of bone marrow cells from these patients with the enhancer of eNOS expression‎ and activity 4-fluoro-N-indan-2-yl-benzamide (AVE9488)93 significantly increased eNOS expression‎ and activity.94 This is associated with an enhanced migratory capacity of the bone marrow cells in vitro and improved neovascularization capacity of these cells in a mouse ischaemic hind-limb model in vivo. This improved limb perfusion by AVE9488-treated bone marrow cells was NO mediated because it was abrogated by pre-treatment of the cells with the eNOS inhibitor NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester. Also, compound AVE9488 showed no effect on the impaired migratory capacity of bone marrow cells from eNOS-deficient mice. Thus, pharmacological enhancement of eNOS expression‎ and activity at least partially reverses the impaired functional activity of bone marrow cells from patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.94 Similarly, the eNOS stimulator simvastatin (see below) enhanced the number of functionally active endothelial progenitor cells in patients with myocardial infarction.95

Gene therapy with nitric oxide synthase

Gene therapy refers to the transfer of a specific gene to the host tissue to intervene in a disease process, with resultant alleviation of the symptoms. Nitric oxide synthase gene therapy has been the focus of numerous studies as dysfunction of this enzyme has been implicated in several types of cardiovascular diseases. Research has concentrated on effects of gene delivery of NOS isoforms (eNOS, iNOS, or nNOS) in animal models of vascular tone, ischaemia–reperfusion injury, intimal hyperplasia, and restenosis. In many pre-clinical models of cardiovascular disease, vascular gene delivery proved to be therapeutically beneficial. Endothelial NOS appears particularly promising as it inhibits intimal hyperplasia and enhances reendothelialization in injured blood vessels. The obvious long-term goal is to translate the benefits of NOS gene therapy seen in animal models into clinical practice. However, further work is required along this way to improve delivery systems and to minimize negative side effects.96,97

Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in pathophysiology

Patients with cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, etc.) and patients with vascular disease show endothelial dysfunction, i.e. the inability of the endothelium to generate adequate amounts of bioactive NO (and to produce NO-mediated vasodilation). Cardiovascular risk factors and vascular disease are also associated with an increased production of ROS. There are several enzyme systems that can potentially produce ROS in the vessel wall. These include the NADPH oxidases, xanthine oxidase, enzymes of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and uncoupled eNOS (see below).98 Of these, NADPH oxidases are of primary importance for ROS generation (Figure 4A). Several isoforms of O2−•-producing NADPH oxidase exist in the vascular wall. They are expressed in endothelial and smooth muscle cells, as well as in the adventitia.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Potential mechanisms by which cardiovascular risk factors lead to oxidative stress and endothelial NOS uncoupling. (A) In many types of vascular disease, NADPH oxidases are up-regulated in the vascular wall and generate superoxide (O2−•). In experimental diabetes mellitus and angiotensin II-induced hypertension, this has been shown to be mediated by protein kinase C (PKC).168,169 Expression‎ of endothelial NOS is also increased in vascular disease. H2O2, the dismutation product of O2−• can increase endothelial NOS expression‎ via transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms (SOD, superoxide dismutase).170 In addition, also protein kinase C activation can enhance endothelial NOS expression‎,171 and protein kinase C inhibitors reduce endothelial NOS expression‎ levels in vascular disease.169 The products of NADPH oxidases and endothelial NOS, O2−• and NO·, rapidly recombine to form peroxynitrite (ONOO−). This can oxidize the essential cofactor of endothelial NOS (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) to trihydrobiopterin radical (BH3•).172,173 BH3• can disproportionate to the quinonoid 6,7-[8H]-H2-biopterin (BH2). As a consequence, oxygen reduction and O2 reduction by endothelial NOS are uncoupled from NO· formation, and a functional NOS is converted into a dysfunctional O2−•-generating enzyme that contributes to vascular oxidative stress. The enhanced endothelial NOS expression‎ (see above) aggravates the situation. (B) Oxidation of BH4 to biologically inactive products such as the BH3• radical or BH2 also reduces the affinity of the substrate l-arginine (l-Arg) to NO, and NOS catalyzes the uncoupled reduction in O2, leading to the production of O2−• (and possibly also H2O2).

Molecular basis of endothelial dysfunction in vascular disease: inactivation of bioactive nitric oxide and endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling

Due to the enhanced oxidative stress seen in vascular disease, an increased degradation of NO by its reaction with O2−• will occur. However, oxidative stress has also been shown to convert eNOS from an NO-producing enzyme to an enzyme that generates O2−•. This process has been referred to as NOS uncoupling (Figure 4B). Mechanisms implicated in eNOS uncoupling include oxidation of the critical NOS cofactor BH4, depletion of l-arginine, and accumulation of endogenous methylarginines. More recently, S-glutathionylation of eNOS has been proposed as yet another mechanism leading to eNOS uncoupling.

The (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin hypothesis

As detailed above, a functional eNOS transfers electrons from NADPH, via the flavins FAD and FMN to the haem, where the substrate l-arginine is oxidized to l-citrulline and NO.99 The reaction product of NO and O2−•, ONOO−, can uncouple oxygen reduction from NO generation in NOS. Oxidation or removal of the essential cofactor BH499–101 or oxidative damage of the zinc–thiolate cluster involved in BH4 and l-arginine binding102 may be the cause of eNOS uncoupling in this situation (Figure 4A and B). ONOO− can oxidize BH4 to the biologically inactive BH3• radical that can disproportionate to the quinonoid 6,7-[8H]-H2-biopterin.103,104 It has been shown that NO production by eNOS correlates closely with the intracellular concentration of BH4,105,106 and BH4 levels have been found decreased in many models of cardiovascular disease107–109,101 and in patients with endothelial dysfunction.110–112

l-Arginine supply of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling

In animal and human pathophysiology (hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension), l-arginine supplementation can improve endothelial dysfunction.113–116 Normal l-arginine plasma concentrations are ∼100 µmol/L. Even in pathophysiology, they hardly fall below 60 µmol/L, and there is an up to 10-fold accumulation of l-arginine within cells.117 On the other hand, the Km of eNOS for l-arginine is only ∼3 µmol/L.118 Also, human endothelial cells are not even dependent on l-arginine uptake from the extracellular space; they can effectively recycle l-citrulline to l-arginine and can also obtain l-arginine from proteolysis.119,120

However, endothelial cells express arginases that can compete with eNOS for substrate and, if highly expressed, ‘starve’ eNOS.121–124 A relative l-arginine deficiency in the vicinity of eNOS caused by excessive arginase activity is conceivable and could explain part of the beneficial effects of l-arginine supplementation. Also non-substrate effects of l-arginine can contribute to these effects. These include potential direct radical-scavenging properties of the guanidino nitrogen group, the cooperativity between l-arginine and BH4-binding sites of NOS,125,126 or the competition of l-arginine with asymmetric dimethyl-l-arginine (ADMA).127

Asymmetrical dimethyl-l-arginine and endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling

Asymmetric dimethyl-l-arginine is considered a risk factor for all-cause cardiovascular mortality.128 Asymmetric dimethyl-l-arginine is an endogenous inhibitor of eNOS, but elevated ADMA has also been associated with eNOS uncoupling.129 The activities (not the expression‎) of the key enzyme for ADMA production, protein arginine N-methyltransferase (PRMT, type I),130 and of the ADMA-degrading enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH)131 are redox-sensitive. In various models, oxidative stress has been shown to increase the activity of PRMT(s) and decrease that of DDAH, thereby leading to increased ADMA concentrations.127,130,131 Thus, an increased production of ROS could trigger increased ADMA levels.

S-Glutathionylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: yet another mechanism leading to endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling

In several disease conditions associated with oxidative stress (see above), BH4 supplementation only partly restores eNOS functionality. Cysteine residues are important for eNOS function. Protein thiols can be subject to S-glutathionylation, a protein modification involved in cell signalling. Conditions of oxidative stress promote S-glutathionylation of proteins. S-Glutathionylation of eNOS reversibly decreases NO production and increases O2−• generation primarily from the reductase domain. Two highly conserved cysteine residues in the reductase domain have been identified as sites of S-glutathionylation.132 Endothelial NOS S-glutathionylation in endothelial cells goes along with an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In blood vessels from hypertensive animals, eNOS S-glutathionylation is increased and endothelium-mediated vasodilation is reduced. That condition is reversed by thiol-specific reducing agents, which reverse S-glutathionylation. Thus, S-glutathionylation of eNOS is likely to represent an additional mechanism involved in eNOS uncoupling.132,133

Pleiotropic actions of conventional cardiovascular drugs that improve endothelial function

Drugs interfering with the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) are able to prevent endothelial dysfunction and eNOS uncoupling.

Drugs interfering with the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

Several components of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system are up-regulated in atherosclerotic vessels. Angiotensin II and aldosterone both promote endothelial dysfunction.134 Angiotensin II activates NADPH oxidases via AT1 stimulation.135 In addition, the AT1 receptor is up-regulated in vitro by low-density lipoprotein.136

In Watanabe heritable hyperlipidaemic rabbits, the renin inhibitor aliskiren increases eNOS expression‎, enhances eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1177 (thereby increasing activity), decreases NADPH oxidase expression‎, augments vascular BH4 levels, and restores eNOS uncoupling.137

Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers have indirect antioxidant effects by preventing the activation of NADPH oxidase.138–141 In addition, they can also increase the activity of extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD3).142 Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease or at high risk for the disease.143 The AT1 receptor blocker losartan restores glomerular NO production by increasing protein expression‎ of GTP cyclohydrolase1 (the rate-limiting enzyme for BH4 synthesis) and elevating BH4 levels in diabetic rats.144

The selective aldosterone antagonist eplerenone and enalapril reduce NADPH oxidase activity, elevate vascular BH4 levels, and enhance eNOS expression‎ and NO bioavailability. Eplerenone also increases eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1177. Both drugs decrease atherosclerotic plaque formation.134

These pleiotropic effects of compounds interfering with the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system may contribute significantly to the therapeutic benefit of such drugs.

Statins

The cholesterol-lowering statins have additional cholesterol-independent or pleiotropic effects in cardiovascular disease.145 These properties include the improvement of endothelial function, stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, inhibition of oxidative stress and inflammation, and reduction in thrombogenic responses.146 These effects of statins are, in part, mediated by an effect on eNOS, because they can be inhibited by eNOS inhibitors147 and are absent in eNOS-deficient mice.95

Statins increase the expression‎ of eNOS,148 but also enhance eNOS activity by decreasing caveolin abundance149 and by activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway.150

Several statins inhibit endothelial O2−• formation by reducing the expression‎ and/or activity of NADPH oxidase and by preventing the isoprenylation of p21 Rac, which is critical for a functional NADPH oxidase.151 In addition, SOD3 activity is more than doubled by simvastatin.

Statins have also been shown to increase GTP cyclohydrolase1 mRNA expression‎ in endothelial cells and to elevate intracellular BH4 levels.152 Atorvastatin has been shown to normalize endothelial function and reduces oxidative stress by inhibiting vascular NADPH oxidases and preventing eNOS uncoupling by an up-regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase1.153 Together, these effects may contribute to the anti-atherogenic action of statins.154,155

Conclusions

All three NOS isozymes have regulatory functions in the cardiovascular system. Neuronal NOS is involved in central regulation of blood pressure, and nNOS-containing (nitrergic) nerves can dilate certain vascular beds. Nitrergic nerves are of particular importance in the relaxation of corpus cavernosum and penile erection. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors require at least a residual nNOS activity for their action. Inducible NOS is found expressed in atherosclerotic plaque and is an important mediator of the fall in blood pressure in septic shock. The most important isoform is eNOS, which keeps blood vessels dilated, controls blood pressure, and has numerous other vasoprotective and anti-atherosclerotic effects. Although there is no evidence that eNOS is a ‘disease gene’, many cardiovascular risk factors lead to oxidative stress, eNOS uncoupling, and endothelial dysfunction in the vasculature. Drugs interfering with the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system as well as statins are useful in preventing endothelial dysfunction. Further elucidation of how these therapeutic agents promote eNOS coupling, in face of elevated oxidative stress, may yield insights into other potential avenues leading to the beneficial actions of NO in the cardiovascular system.

Funding

Original work from our laboratories contributing to this review was supported by the Integrated Research and Treatment Center ‘Thrombosis and Hemostasis’ of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), by grant LI-1042/1-1 from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), and by grants R01 HL64793, R01 HL61371, R01 HL081190, R01 HL096670, and P01 HL70295 from the National Institutes of Health, USA.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

• 1.O'Dell TJ, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER, Arancio O. Tests of the roles of two diffusible substances in long-term potentiation: evidence for nitric oxide as a possible early retrograde messenger. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:11285–11289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2.Schuman EM, Madison DV. A requirement for the intercellular messenger nitric oxide in long-term potentiation. Science. 1991;254:1503–1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1720572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Rapoport RM, Draznin MB, Murad F. Endothelium-dependent relaxation in rat aorta may be mediated through cyclic GMP-dependent protein phosphorylation. Nature. 1983;306:174–176. doi: 10.1038/306174a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4.Förstermann U, Mülsch A, Böhme E, Busse R. Stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase by an acetylcholine-induced endothelium-derived factor from rabbit and canine arteries. Circ Res. 1986;58:531–538. doi: 10.1161/01.res.58.4.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Khan BV, Harrison DG, Olbrych MT, Alexander RW, Medford RM. Nitric oxide regulates vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 gene expression‎ and redox-sensitive transcriptional events in human vascular endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9114–9119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6.Gudi T, Hong GK, Vaandrager AB, Lohmann SM, Pilz RB. Nitric oxide and cGMP regulate gene expression‎ in neuronal and glial cells by activating type II cGMP-dependent protein kinase. FASEB J. 1999;13:2143–2152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7.Pantopoulos K, Hentze MW. Nitric oxide signaling to iron-regulatory protein: direct control of ferritin mRNA translation and transferrin receptor mRNA stability in transfected fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:1267–1271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8.Liu XB, Hill P, Haile DJ. Role of the ferroportin iron-responsive element in iron and nitric oxide dependent gene regulation. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002;29:315–326. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Pozdnyakov N, Lloyd A, Reddy VN, Sitaramayya A. Nitric oxide-regulated endogenous ADP-ribosylation of rod outer segment proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;192:610–615. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Brune B, Dimmeler S, Molina y Vedia L, Lapetina EG. Nitric oxide: a signal for ADP-ribosylation of proteins. Life Sci. 1994;54:61–70. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00775-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11.Mikkelsen RB, Wardman P. Biological chemistry of reactive oxygen and nitrogen and radiation-induced signal transduction mechanisms. Oncogene. 2003;22:5734–5754. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 12.Lee JH, Yang ES, Park JW. Inactivation of NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase by peroxynitrite. Implications for cytotoxicity and alcohol-induced liver injury. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:51360–51371. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302332200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Ridnour LA, Thomas DD, Mancardi D, Espey MG, Miranda KM, Paolocci N, Feelisch M, Fukuto J, Wink DA. The chemistry of nitrosative stress induced by nitric oxide and reactive nitrogen oxide species. Putting perspective on stressful biological situations. Biol Chem. 2004;385:1–10. doi: 10.1515/BC.2004.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 14.Crane BR, Arvai AS, Ghosh DK, Wu C, Getzoff ED, Stuehr DJ, Tainer JA. Structure of nitric oxide synthase oxygenase dimer with pterin and substrate. Science. 1998;279:2121–2126. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5359.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15.Alderton WK, Cooper CE, Knowles RG. Nitric oxide synthases: structure, function and inhibition. Biochem J. 2001;357:593–615. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16.Nishimura JS, Martasek P, McMillan K, Salerno J, Liu Q, Gross SS, Masters BS. Modular structure of neuronal nitric oxide synthase: localization of the arginine binding site and modulation by pterin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;210:288–294. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17.Noble MA, Munro AW, Rivers SL, Robledo L, Daff SN, Yellowlees LJ, Shimizu T, Sagami I, Guillemette JG, Chapman SK. Potentiometric analysis of the flavin cofactors of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Biochemistry. 1999;38:16413–16418. doi: 10.1021/bi992150w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18.Stuehr D, Pou S, Rosen GM. Oxygen reduction by nitric-oxide synthases. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14533–14536. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100011200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 19.Cho HJ, Xie QW, Calaycay J, Mumford RA, Swiderek KM, Lee TD, Nathan C. Calmodulin is a subunit of nitric oxide synthase from macrophages. J Exp Med. 1992;176:599–604. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.2.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 20.Hemmens B, Mayer B. Enzymology of nitric oxide synthases. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;100:1–32. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-749-1:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 21.Hemmens B, Goessler W, Schmidt K, Mayer B. Role of bound zinc in dimer stabilization but not enzyme activity of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35786–35791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005976200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Raman CS, Li H, Martasek P, Kral V, Masters BS, Poulos TL. Crystal structure of constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase: a paradigm for pterin function involving a novel metal center. Cell. 1998;95:939–950. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81718-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 23.Li H, Raman CS, Glaser CB, Blasko E, Young TA, Parkinson JF, Whitlow M, Poulos TL. Crystal structures of zinc-free and -bound heme domain of human inducible nitric-oxide synthase. Implications for dimer stability and comparison with endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21276–21284. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.30.21276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 24.Furchgott RF, Cherry PD, Zawadzki JV, Jothianandan D. Endothelial cells as mediators of vasodilation of arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;53:557–573. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198406002-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 25.Knowles RG, Palacios M, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Formation of nitric oxide from l-arginine in the central nervous system: a transduction mechanism for stimulation of the soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:5159–5162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]