스크랩 누가 트럼프 대통령당선자를 축출하는 쿠데타를 밀어부치나요?

[조정훈목사]

지배엘리트가 2016년에 쿠데타를 일으키네

The "Elite" Coup of 2016 By Moon of Alabama Dec 17, 2016 - 3:37:50 AM

• December 15th 2016
• 
  
• 지배엘리트가 트럼프 당선자에 대항한 쿠데타를 시도하고 있다  There is an "elite" coup attempt underway against the U.S. President-elect Trump.
• 이 쿠데타는 힐라리클린턴 캠프가 조종하며, 씨아이에이와 의회의 네오콘 권력이 연합하고 있다   The coup is orchestrated by the camp of Hillary Clinton in association with the CIA and neoconservative powers in Congress.
• 이 계획은 씨아이에이가 키우고있는, "미대선에 러시아정부가 개입했고, 트럼프를 대선에서 승리하게 만들었다," 라는 조작 프로퍼갠더 계략을 통해서 시작한 것이다. 이것은 미의회에 문제안건으로 제기되었고, 공화당의 주요 네오콘과 전쟁주의자들이 클린턴에게 대통령직을 넘기게 하려는 무서운 음모로 돌아간다.
• 만일 그들의 힐라리 대통령직 수여가 무산된다면 , 최소한 마이크펜스 부통령을 대통령 직에라도 올리겠다는 것이다. 이런 절박한 음모는 트럼프가 대통령직에 오를때, 자기들의 전쟁 통치가 중단될 위기에 몰렸기 때문이다.                                  The plan is to use the CIA's "Russia made Trump the winner" nonsense to swing the electoral college against him. The case would then be bumped up to Congress. Major neocon and warmonger parts of the Republicans could then move the presidency to Clinton or, if that fails, put Trump's vice president-elect Mike Pence onto the throne. The regular bipartisan war business, which a Trump presidency threatens to interrupt, could continue.
• Should the coup succeed violent insurrections in the United States are likely to ensue with unpredictable consequences.

위의 논제들은 대략적인 정황을 짚은 것이다. 그들의 상세한 계략은 아직 나오지 않았다. 허나 지금까지의 드러난 작전과 언론 보도를 보면 아주 명백한데, 다음 절차가 드러난다.

최우선 목표는 일단 트럼프를 대통령직에 오르지 못하게 만드는 것이다.

그는 너무 독립적이며, 또 미국을 통치하는 권력집단에게 심각한 위협이다. 이번에 국무장관 자리에 틸러슨을 임명한 것은 바로 그런 사례인데(그들은 국무부 부장관으로 임명된 볼튼을 오르지 못하게 만든다), 틸러슨은 생산적인 안정성의 인물이지, 다른 나라들의 정권을 교체시키는 음모를 수행할 사람이 아니다.

이런 트럼프의 개혁에 대해 위협을 느끼는 조직은 다음과 같다 :

The above theses are thus far only a general outlay. No general plan has been published. The scheme though is pretty obvious by now. However, the following contains some speculation.

The priority aim is to deny Trump the presidency. He is too independent and a danger for several power centers within the ruling U.S. power circles. The selection of Tillerson as new Secretary of State only reinforces this (Prediction: Bolton will not get the Deputy position.)  Tillerson is for profitable stability, not for regime change adventures. The institutional Trump enemies are:

• 씨아이에이인데, 이 조직은 부시와 오바마 행정부에서 중앙 암살국으로 활약했고, 아프간, 파키스탄, 등지에서 무인드로이드기를 통해서 암살을 일삼았다. 그들의 예산의 대부분이 시리아 전쟁을 지속시키는데 투입되었고, 역시 암살에 쓰여졌다. 트럼프의 미국 우선, 전쟁그만 정책은 이 조직의 공격작전을 종식시키며 예산도 삭감하게된다.                                             The CIA which has become the Central Assassination Agency under the Bush and Obama administrations. Huge parts of its budgets depend on a continuation of the war on Syria and the drone assassination campaigns in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere. Trump's more isolationist policies would likely end these campaigns and the related budget troughs.
• 군수산업은 막대한 매출을 잃을 것이고 또 트럼프가 중동 지역과 그외 지역에서 미군의 개입을 허용치 않을 것이기에 페르시아만 국가에 대한 막대한 매출도 잃게된다.                                                                                                                   The weapons industry which could lose its enormous sales to its major customers in the Persian Gulf should a President Trump reduce U.S. interference in the Middle East and elsewhere.
• 네오콘과 이스라엘 리쿠드당은 이스라엘 시오니즘 전략에 있어서 미국이 계속 뛰어주길 원하나, 트럼프는 응하지 않는다.    The neoconservatives and Likudniks who want the U.S. as Israel's weapon to strong arm the Middle East to the Zionists' benefit.
• 보통의 전쟁주의자 강경파는 세계의 분쟁을 야기하고 대결주의가 중지되므로써 자신들의 신념이 멈춰지는 저주를 받는다.   The general war hawks, military and "humanitarian interventionists" to whom any reduction of the U.S. role as primary power in the world is anathema to their believes.

현재 씨아이에이 브레넌 국장은 이 조직의 고문프로그램의 주요 인물인데, 오바마의 고문이며 힐라리클린턴 진영에 속해있다.

전직 헤이든 국장과 파네타 국장도 내놓고 클린턴을 지지하는 자들로써 고문의 마왕들이며, 마이클 모렐 부국장도 역사 같은 부류이다. 이런 자들이 반 러시아 프로프갠더 계략 공격을 저지르는 것은 놀라운 일이 아니다.

그들의 언론 조작을 통해 미국민은 러시아가 미 대선에 개입했고, 그때문에 트럼프가 당선되었다는 관념을 갖게 되었다.

따라서 트럼프가 승리한게 합법적이지 못하다는 인상을 심을수있었다. 그런 심리조작을 통해서 12월19일의 투표에서 선거인단이 불법적으로 반 트럼프 투표를 하도록 유도할 수있다는 것이다.

The current CIA director Brennan, a leading figure of the CIA torture program and Obama consigliere, is in the Clinton/anti-Trump camp. The former CIA heads Hayden and Panetta are public Clinton supporters as is torturer king and former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

It is thereby no wonder that the CIA is leading the anti-Russian campaign. Its task now is to implant the idea in the U.S. public that Russian intervention skewed the U.S. election towards Trump. The purpose is the delegitimization of the Trump victory in the eyes of the media and public but even more so in the eyes of the electors within the electoral college.

씨아이에이는 주류언론의 막대한 지지를 받았고 대선기간동안 클린턴을 밀어?다. 그 씨아이에이 조직은 과거에 이라크전쟁을 위해서 사담후세인이 대량살상무기를 가졌다는 엉터리 보도도 언론과 합동으로 펼쳐낸 장본인이다.

민주당과 하바다 법대 로렌스 레시그 교수는 선거인단으로 하여금 반트럼프 투표를 함에 있어 법률 자문을 해주고 있다.

만일 선거인단의 다수가 기권하거나 반트럼프 투표를 던지면 트럼프가 당선되는데 요구되는 270표가 도달치 못해서 전체 선거는 의회로 결정이 넘어가게 된다.

이 과정에서 상원과 하원은 요동치면서 분열하고 미국은 다시금 대통령선거의 불법적인 혼돈에 빠지는데, 결국 대법원에서 누가 옳으냐는 걸 갖고서 치열한 분쟁을 벌일 것이다. 이것이 민주당과 네오콘이 대선 흔들기 작전을 하면서 이끌어내려는 것이다.

그런데 미국민은 이런 어둠의 계략을 알게되었는데, 가만히 보고만 있을 것인가?

선거인단은 법을 어기고 양심을 어기면서까지 민주당과 네오콘의 불법행위에 가담할 것인가?

미국의 힘의 세력중에 군부와 정보계는 씨아이에이의 불법 책략을 그냥 놔둘 것인가?

그에 대한 답은 오는 12월19일(한국시간 12월20일 화요일) 선거인단 투표 결과를 보면 알게 될 것이다.

The CIA is heavily supported by the same mainstream media that pushed for Clinton during the election. (These are, not by chance, also the same media that pushed the CIA's earlier "Saddam's Weapon of Mass Destruction" campaign.)

The Democratic partisan and Harvard law Professor Lawrence Lessig is pushing the electors and offers them free personal legal support. He says the electoral college vote is now close.

Could 37 Republican electors, put there by voters in their states to vote for Trump, be convinced to move from electing Trump to abstain or vote for someone else, Trump would miss the needed 270 votes. The whole election of the president would then by kicked up to the House of Representatives.

Should the electors vote for Trump there is still a possibility that members of the House and the Senate could officially question that vote and cause delays or Congressional probes and legal challenges.

Here are the detailed general proceedings and specifics for the electoral college as explained by the National Archives and Records Administration.

Though neoconservatives have no genuine support within the U.S. electorate they have a strong hold on significant parts of Congress and the relevant MSM commentariat. Many leading neoconservatives and war hawks like Robert Kagan, Max Boot and the Washington Post editorial board came out for Clinton during the campaign. Clinton even ran campaign advertisements with Republican Congress luminaries like Lindsay Graham, Sasse and Flake.

The House and the Senate majority may well be on the anti-Trump side if push comes to shove. But whatever the outcome there surely would be intense legal challenges and I expect the case to go up to the Supreme Court.

As an alternative to legal shenanigans Trump's inauguration could be delayed by Obama's order to the intelligence community to create a formal review of Russian intervention in the election by January 20. That is not by chance the official inauguration date! The selling point:

By ordering a "full review" of allegations of Russian into the 2016 election process, President Barack Obama is essentially asking the IC to make an analytical judgment about the validity of the election that will place Trump in the Oval Office.

A "compromise" in Congress could be to wait for the Intelligence Community's analysis and then discuss it before certifying Trump as president. That would end up with no result as National Intelligence Estimates are notoriously vague. Meanwhile the Vice President-elect would sit in as acting President:

If the President-elect fails to qualify before inauguration, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment states that the Vice President-elect will act as President until such a time as a President has qualified.

If the congressional or legal process around the Trump election gets delayed, that may be a state for a long time. The ruling Washington blob or borg could well live with an acting President Pence while Trump would have no official say in any government business. (Could Clinton then become acting VP or qualify as the new president?)

The media intervention on the anti-Trump side is heavy.

But first keep in mind that there is no public evidence, ZERO, that Russia indeed had anything to do with the DNC or Podesta or other leaks and the publication of emails by various outlets like Wikileaks.

Craig Murray assures us that he knows that these were not hacks but insider leaks and that he knows the leaker(s). Indeed he now tells us that the emails were handed over to him during a visits in Washington. Former intelligence officials including the technically very knowledgeable former NSA official William Binney concur that the hacking story is false.

All we have heard or seen so far are hearsay rumors and allegations of evidence. To me as experienced IT professional the case is technically laughable just as Murray explains here. If the claimed hacks occurred at all the alleged methods were so common that anybody could have done these. There is not even one claimed fact yet that is technically halfway acceptable as evidence that "Russia did it".

But still the NYT runs a big package of pieces telling us that "Russia did it" based on the non-factual CIA rumors and unprofessional IT assertions by Crowdstrike, the self-promoting IT security company the DNC hired and paid. Before that the Washington Post published major claims of Russian interference by anonymous officials. NBC News now tops that with "intelligence officials" saying Putin himself ran the hacking campaign. Authors of the story are the long time insider hacks Bill Arkin and Ken Dilanian known for clearing his stories with the CIA before publishing. The next story will tells us that Vladimir Valdimirovich himself was punching the keyboard.

Many news outlets and editorials follow these "leads".

Part of the scheme the Clinton campaign has worked out was explained by a former opposition research consultant to the Democratic National Council, the Ukrainian-American Alexandra (aka Andrea) Chalupa, in this thread:

Andrea Chalupa ?@AndreaChalupa Dec 11

1.) Electoral College meets Dec. 19. If Electors ignore #StateOfEmergency we're in, & Trump gets elected, we can stop him Jan. 6 in Congress

2.) If any objections to Electoral College vote are made, they must be submitted in writing, signed by at least 1 House member & 1 Senator

3.) If objections are presented, House & Senate withdraw to their chambers to consider their merits under procedures set out in federal law. 
...

Editorials and op-eds in the major papers are pushing the scheme along. Just for example from a long list A.J. Dionne in the Washington Post:

The CIA's finding that Russia actively intervened in our election to make Trump president is an excellent reason for the electors to consider whether they should exercise their independent power. At the very least, they should be briefed on what the CIA knows, and in particular on whether there is any evidence that Trump or his lieutenants were engaged with Russia during the campaign.

The New York Times editorial laments about Trump ridiculing the CIA fairy tales it promotes.

Many people who have voted for Trump would be disgusted and outraged if or when Trump will be denied his office. Many of them are armed and would protest. Violence is ensured should the coup succeed.

Trump selected four former generals to joins his cabinet and staff. Should the troubles escalate we might be roughly in for a scenario as laid out in the 1992 military paper: The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012 (pdf) by Charles J. Dunlap.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/12/elite-coup.html#more

**************

불량한 씨아이에이는 새로운 선거를 요구하며 트럼프 암살을 꾀한다

Rogue CIA Calls For New Election Could Lead To Trump Assassination

The Alex Jones Channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCJTRIcKCHg