Clinton camp sniffs blood as GOP tears itself apart over Trump

[chahlley]

(Hot News Today Thursday 13 October 2016)

Clinton camp sniffs blood as GOP tears itself apart over Trump

It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America

the way I want to. Mr Donald Trump Republican Presidential Nominee

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s intensifying battle with his own party is tearing open the country’s political map, pulling Republicans into a self-destructive feud that could imperil dozens of lawmakers in Congress and potentially throw conservative-leaning states into Mrs Hillary Clinton’s column.

Democrats are moving swiftly to exploit Mr Trump’s crumbling position in the presidential race, aiming to run up a big margin of victory for Mrs Clinton and extend their political advantage into the congressional elections next month.

Mrs Clinton’s campaign has concluded that at least two traditionally Republican states, Georgia and Arizona, are realistic targets for her to win over.

Mrs Clinton now holds such a strong upper hand that Priorities USA, a super PAC backing her campaign, may direct some of its war chest into Senate races, two people said, and may begin broadcasting ads for those contests as soon as next week. Congressional Democrats also hope to persuade Mrs Clinton to continue pouring money and campaign resources into states like Virginia and Colorado, where they believe her victory is assured, in order to lift other Democratic candidates.

In a signal of Democrats’ growing focus on the House and Senate, Mrs Clinton used a visit on Tuesday to Miami to attack both Mr Trump and Senator Marco Rubio.

Mrs Clinton’s campaign chairman, Mr John D Podesta, told reporters that she would continue to call out down-ballot Republicans.

Mr Rubio, who has led in his reelection campaign by a comfortable but not overwhelming margin, is among the Republicans whom Priorities USA may seek to defeat, if the group decides to intervene in Senate races, one strategist said.

Increasingly anxious Republicans have not come up with a unified strategy for containing the damage from Mr Trump’s embattled candidacy, and several strategists and party officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity said they were awaiting a new round of polling before settling on a course.

But, in a sign that Republicans now view the presidential race as a lost cause, several Senate candidates are preparing ads asking voters to elect them as a check on Mrs Clinton in the White House.

Yet Mr Trump himself, having been rejected in recent days by dozens of Republican elected officials, has indicated that he will make any separation an exceptionally messy and painful ordeal for the party.

Mr Trump lashed out publicly on Tuesday morning at two of his bestknown critics: Senator John McCain of Arizona, who withdrew his endorsement of Mr Trump over the weekend, and Mr Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House, who informed congressional Republicans on Monday that he would no longer defend Mr Trump.

Seething on Twitter, Mr Trump attacked Mr Ryan as “weak and ineffective” and described Mr McCain as “very foul-mouthed”. And in a Fox News interview, Mr Trump mocked both men as disloyal, reserving special venom for Mr Ryan.

“Paul Ryan opened borders and amnesty and bad budgets,” Mr Trump said.

He declared himself a liberated man, writing on Twitter: “It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America the way I want to.”
Should Mr Trump continue deriding the leaders of the institutional Republican Party, it could have profound consequences down the ballot, potentially depressing turnout by demoralising the party or leading Mr Trump’s ardent supporters to deny their votes to Republicans who abandoned him.

But there is little Republicans can do to control Mr Trump’s behaviour: The party’s donors have no leverage over him, he is relying largely on small donors and, at 70, he is not mindful of any future campaign.

The emerging dynamic may be especially toxic for Republicans in swing states that are also home to competitive races for the House and Senate, where the party’s candidates must choose between two unpalatable options: Alienating much of their party’s base or standing behind a nominee who is unacceptable to most mainstream voters.

The voting bloc that especially concerns Republican officials are the right-of-centre, college-educated voters who usually favour Republican candidates but cannot abide  Mr Trump.

These voters can make up anywhere between a quarter to a third of the party’s electoral coalition.

“That voter is clearly not going to vote for Donald Trump,” said Mr Josh Holmes, a Republican strategist who is working on several Senate races. “But if they don’t vote at all, it’s catastrophic for us.” THE NEW YORK TIMES