전투기 F-47의 조상은 X-36

[백선호]

ASPI에 Bill Sweetman이 쓴 글입니다.

수직 꼬리날개가 없는 X-36이 F-47의 조상일 것이라고 추측하네요. 비행기의 기수가 좌우로 움직이는 운동인 yaw는 공기를 어느 한쪽으로 뿜어 제어할 것이라고 추측합니다.

The X-36 represented an agile supersonic configuration lacking a vertical tail, an item that’s best left out to improve stealth but is missed because it’s so important to stability. Elevons and canards might control the aircraft’s pitch and roll, but there was no hint of anything to control its yaw. General Electric’s advanced programs lead, Harvey Maclin, was at the time talking about fluidic thrust vectoring — injecting air into an engine’s exhaust on one side or the other — as a solution that did not involve stealth-defeating outside flaps.

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/grandma-is-that-you-area-51-snap-may-confirm‎-the-long-roots-of-the-f-47/

Grandma, is that you? Area 51 snap may confirm‎ the long roots of the F-47 | The Strategist

Grandma, is that you? Area 51 snap may confirm‎ the long roots of the F-47

16 Jun 2026 | Bill Sweetman

More than a year ago, I speculated here about a connection between the forthcoming Boeing F-47, a modest technology demonstration program from the 1990s and a little-remembered pioneer of stealth.

A set of images of an unknown aircraft in an infra-red video, released this month, suggests I may have been on target. The video was taken by Youtube creators Project Fear, close to the secure flight-test facility known as Area 51. The footage has been vouched for by Anders Otteson, who brought us another classified aircraft in January.

What we see is a three-aspect match.

First, it looks like a twin-engine aircraft, and as I wrote in March 2025, we have had many indications that the F-47, the US Air Force’s future air-dominance centrepiece, is big – not exactly a follow-on to the F-22 but a ‘penetrating counter-air’ aircraft supporting deep attack at long range, which means hitting ground-based air defences and air-surveillance radars as much as engaging in combat with fighters. A big fighter that could do that would have two engines.

Second, the lean shape and sharply swept, aft-set wings of the unknown Area 51 aircraft look well optimised for supersonic cruise. The Pentagon’s adaptive-engine program, which has run in parallel with the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) effort that has produced the F-47, is intended to deliver supersonic cruise, but without the high specific fuel consumption at subsonic speeds that has bedevilled the F-22 and its F119 engine.

Third, what we’ve now seen over Area 51 is a pretty good ringer for the 1990s X-36 demonstrator. The X-36 was tiny and slow: 380 km/h and 565 kg with an engine from the AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile. Its one job was to show that a supersonic, stealthy shape with no vertical tails could be controlled at low speed.

So we must strongly suspect that what’s just appeared over Area 51 is an F-47 prototype or perhaps a pre-development aircraft shaped like the F-47.

The link between X-36 and NGAD, as reported last March, is the late Alan Wiechman, who led McDonnell Douglas’s, later Boeing’s stealth work from the mid-1980s until he retired in 2014. He reached the rank of vice-president of special technology innovation, as broad a hint of his involvement in stealth as you could want.

Wiechman worked in secret. I knew he existed only because I was a friend of one of his colleagues. And he was, I think, a bit surprised when I introduced myself at the rollout of the YF-118G Bird of Prey  in 2001. He worked alongside Denys Overholser, Alan Brown and others at Lockheed’s Skunk Works in the late 1970s and was known for his ownership of a Chevrolet Corvette that had a mysterious inability to be clocked on the California Highway Patrol’s radar guns.

The McDonnell Douglas stealth group that Wiechman joined in 1981 was talented but not as influential as it might have been. As the USAF evolved its Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) requirement, which led to the F-22, between 1981 and 1984, McDonnell Douglas’s program manager was a hard-charging fighter general who had flown combat missions in World War II, Korea and Vietnam, and he thought stealth was downright unmanly.

The problem was that some of the people in the ATF system project office had flown under his command in Vietnam and detested him. They were happy to indulge the general’s view that stealth was a passing fad. McDonnell Douglas bid a conventional ATF design and got handed fifth place behind awardee team leaders Lockheed and Northrop, General Dynamics and, worst of all, Boeing, which had not delivered a fighter to the Air Force since Franklin D Roosevelt’s first term.

At the same time, McDonnell Douglas found itself playing second banana to General Dynamics on the Advanced Tactical Aircraft program, the US Navy’s stealth bomber.

McDonnell Douglas president Sanford McDonnell decided that enough was enough and elevated Wiechman to leadership of a stealth-focused team in St Louis. The group had two distinguishing features. One was a dual focus: as well as looking at the extremes of stealth in new, specialised designs, the team studied how to reduce the radar cross-section of conventional aircraft. The latter effort contributed to the development of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. There was a parallel study for the F-15.

The team’s other distinguishing feature was that it was hidden in plain sight under the banner of the company’s advanced-prototyping division, the Phantom Works. In there it was alongside a group that was focused on production cost and better ways to build combat aircraft. A tour that I got in 1992 was educational. Here were high-speed machining cells. There was a low-cost radar cross-section range. There were carbon-loaded sneaker prints near a laboratory door (indicative of work on radar-absorbing materials), and low-cost forms made from chipboard that, in retrospect, resembled the rear end of the Bird of Prey.

Wiechman himself was invisible. At one point I searched for him on the company website. There was one mention, in a list of 25-year employees.

The X-36 and Bird of Prey designs were different and complementary. The Bird of Prey was intended to be stealthy enough to vanish in daylight (with lighter paint around the inlet, counter-shading what would otherwise be a giveaway shadow).

The X-36 represented an agile supersonic configuration lacking a vertical tail, an item that’s best left out to improve stealth but is missed because it’s so important to stability. Elevons and canards might control the aircraft’s pitch and roll, but there was no hint of anything to control its yaw. General Electric’s advanced programs lead, Harvey Maclin, was at the time talking about fluidic thrust vectoring — injecting air into an engine’s exhaust on one side or the other — as a solution that did not involve stealth-defeating outside flaps.

Maclin was GE’s advocate for an engine design (the Controlled Overall Pressure-ratio Engine) that had evolved from the variable-bypass F120, the losing candidate for powering the ATF. This new design could switch from a configuration good for subsonic flight (as a turbofan) to a turbojet mode that could push a fighter through the air supersonically without afterburning – that is, it could cruise supersonically. The design was the direct ancestor of today’s adaptive engines and a perfect match for an X-36-like combat aircraft.

So, that’s what may have happened. Wiechman’s obituary in 2023 noted that he had ‘most recently’ been an adviser on stealth to the USAF Rapid Capabilities Office. And now there’s an X-36-like shape over Nevada.

Consider. There’s an alternative history narrative where in the mid-1990s the USAF goes forward with the delta-winged F-16 Falcon 21, on United Arab Emirates money, and Wiechman’s stealth-treated F-15. And the service invests seriously in his next-step airframe and Maclin’s engine, two decades before NGAD.

Instead, the USAF is buying warmed-over 1980s-tech F-15Es and looking at 50-year-old F-16s flying in the 2040s, while the aircraft chosen, among other reasons, because it might — but didn’t — solve the Marines’ airpower problems is mired in an endless upgrade. This makes China happy.

There are words for this, but my editor does not want to print them.

==========

Bill Sweetman is a veteran, award-winning journalist and aerospace industry executive.

Image (top) of the aircraft videoed over Area 51: Fear Project/Youtube.

Image (middle) comparing  the newly seen aircraft with the X-36: Fear Project and NASA.

AI contributed no ideas to this article – Bill Sweetman.

[여행자김씨]

저게 형상이 확정이래요?

[백선호]

그렇다고 생각하는 의견이 많습니다.

[여행자김씨]

카나드를 단 것이 인상적이네요 특별한 이유가 있을까요?

[백선호]

보잉이 항모용 F/A-XX로 제안한 것의 저속 조종성을 위해 카나드를 달았고 F-47은 그 물건의 공군 버전이라서 그렇다는 검증되지 않은 썰이 있긴 합니다.

[여행자김씨]

만약 그 썰이 사실이라면 저건 F/A-XX일 가능성이 있겠군요. 하긴 공군형 F-47은 돌아다니는 추측 모델링으로는 카나드가 있다 없다 형상도 막 다르고 정리되지 않긴한데 정식으로 출고될 날이 궁금하군요

[강준구]

진짜 날아다니는 오징어가 등장해버리겠네요.