Can you spot the real one: Consumers’ ability to detect real vs. fraudulent

[김양석]

Description

Study 1 investigates consumers’ ability to distinguish between authentic and fraudulent event tickets. In addition, the study examines whether individual differences—specifically risk-taking, impulsiveness, and analytical reasoning—are related to participants’ discrimination accuracy. Participants viewed a set of eight tickets (four authentic and four fraudulent) presented in random order across four event types, and subsequently completed standardized measures assessing risk-taking, impulsiveness, and analytical reasoning. The dataset reflects all materials and responses collected as part of this study and corresponds to the hypotheses outlined in the accompanying manuscript.

Source: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/42df84bzf7/1

Can you spot the real one: Consumers’ ability to detect real vs. fraudulent tickets - Study 1

Description

Study 2 was designed to extend the findings of Study 1 and examine how contextual factors influence consumers’ ability to differentiate between authentic and fraudulent event tickets. Specifically, the study tested whether time pressure and ticket scarcity further impair discrimination accuracy. Prior research demonstrates that time pressure increases purchasing behavior and reduces individuals’ ability to detect fraudulent online environments, while scarcity cues elevate perceived value, urgency, and fear of missing out. In this study, participants eval‎uated event tickets under conditions involving manipulated levels of time pressure and scarcity. The dataset includes all experimental materials, behavioral responses, and condition assignments associated with these manipulations, in accordance with the hypotheses developed in the accompanying manuscript.

Source: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/c9dvc6pz2b/1

Can you spot the real one: Consumers’ ability to detect real vs. fraudulent tickets - Study 2

Description

Study 3 examines whether providing participants with precautionary information improves their ability to distinguish between authentic and fraudulent event tickets. Prior research shows that educational interventions can reduce susceptibility to fraud across domains such as phishing, telemarketing, and investment scams; however, similar interventions have not been tested in the context of ticket fraud. In this study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a control group that completed the task as in Study 1, an intervention group that received information on how to identify fraudulent tickets before performing the discrimination task, and a second intervention group that received the same information along with the opportunity to review and revise each purchasing decision. All participants completed the same ticket discrimination task following their assigned instructions. The dataset includes demographic information, condition assignments, instructional materials for both interventions, and all responses collected as part of the study, corresponding to the hypotheses outlined in the accompanying manuscript.

Can you spot the real one Consumers’ ability to de.zip

83.47KB

Can you spot the real one Consumers’ ability to de (1).zip

140.38KB

Can you spot the real one Consumers’ ability to de (2).zip

88.43KB