1주차 4, 10-16번

[ㅇㅈㅇ]

4번
The sentence (c), (e) and (f) show the same pattern as the sentence (1). The subject arguments in (c), (e), and (f) acquire their thematic role from the predicate of the complement clause. On the other hand, the sentence (a), (b), and (d) acquire their thematic role from the predicate of the main clause.

10번 (모고)
Unergative verbs allow the -er nominalization, but unaccusative verbs do not.

11번
The ungrammatical sentences are (a), (c), and (d).
The NP of agent role disappear in the verb of these sentences, so it cannot be used with by-phrase or to-infinitive clause.

12번
Sentence (7) is ungrammatical. The passive past participle 'believed' cannot assign case to the NP Bill. In addition, the NP Bill cannot be assigned case from the embedded clause.
기출 3번째 문제
'Believed' in (6) and (7) can take a finite clause and a non-finite clause as its complement. However, when 'believe' takes a non-finite clause, it cannot allow an NP like Bill to immediately follow it.

13번
Sentence (2b) is ungrammatical. An NP originates in the subject position and is assigned case and a theta role. Therefore, expletive 'there' cannot take the subject position because it cannot be assigned a theta role.

14번
Sentence (a) is grammatical. The expletive 'there' always occupies the subject position, so 'there' and verb 'won't' can be inverted in tag question. However, sentence (b) is ungrammatical. Since 'here' in sentence (b) is a demonstrative, it cannot be used as a subject in tag question.

15번
The expletive 'there' always occupies the subject position, but it occupies the object position in sentence (6), which results in ungrammaticality. In (7), the verb 'told' iposes semantic restriction on its argument 'the tree' which should be a rational entity. Since the NP 'the tree' is not a rational entity, sentence (7) is ungrammatical.

16번
Sentence (3b) is ungrammatical. The NP 'shit' should appear in the subject position to have idiomatic meaning, but it is in the object position. Sentence (3d) is ungrammatial. The expletive 'there', which should always turn up in the subject position, occupies the object position.

교수님 감사합니다!!

[이동걸]

#11. so it cannot be used with agent-oriented expressions like by-phrases, to-infinitival clauses and adverbs 'deliverately'. 마지막 문장에 agent-oriented expressions 을 넣어주면 좋겠습니다.

[이동걸]

#12. the passive past participle 'believed' -> the passived verb 'believed'라고 표현해 주세요.
"the NP Bill cannot be assigned case from the embedded clause."-> ...assigned case from 'to' of the embedded clasue 라고 해주시게 정확합니다. 내포절로부터 케이스를 못받는게 아니라 내포절의 'to'로 부터 할당받지 못합니다. (중요함!!)

[이동걸]

#13. An NP originates in the subject position and is assigned case and a theta role -> (2) 문장은 주어자리가 두군데 있으므로 The NP of the main clause (or the higher clause) originates in the... 라고 명확하게 표현해 주시기 바랍니다.
"...because it cannot be assigned a theta role." 이유를 나타내는 마지막 문장은 therefore 앞에서 이미 언급했으므로 또 하실 필요는 없습니다. 이 문제의 답안에서 unexpected가 adjectival passive라는 점도 언급해 주셔야 합니다. 이 개념이 이문제를 설명하는데 핵심개념이기 때문입니다.

[이동걸]

#15. 답안은 잘 쓰셨습니다. 다만 다소 아쉬운 점은 핵심 뽀인트 표현이 언급이 안됐다는겁니다. 즉 main verb의 told의 특징을 언급하시게 좋습니다. -> the following NP of the verb 'told' is an object ...... 이렇게 동사와 그 뒤에 나오는 명사사 object 임을 연결시키는게 중요합니다. (7)번에서도 the tree가 main verb'told'의 논항임을 반드시 언급해 주시고 그러므로 논항에 선택제약을 가한다 라고 기술해 주시면 좋겠습니다.

[이동걸]

#16. (3b)에서도 15번 문제와 마찬가지로 the following NP of the main verb 'persuaded is an object이라고 언급하신 후 그 자리에 shit이 올 수 없다라고 기술해 주시기 바랍니다. (3d)에서도 object 자리를 동사와 연결시켜 주세요.

[ㅇㅈㅇ]

감사합니다 교수님!!