프리미어 [EPL 26라운드]골닷컴 맨유 v 맨시티 평점 및 촌평

[waiter]

Player Ratings: Manchester United - Manchester City Party poopers Manchester City claimed all three points and a rare double over neighbours United in an emotionally charged derby. Nigel Smith offers his player-ratings from the game.

zoom - galleria

MANCHESTER UNITED  

Van Der Sar - 6: Had no chance with either of City’s goals and will feel let down by the ragged performance of the defenders in front. (시티 두 골을 막을 수 없었고 앞의 수비수들의 조화롭지 못한 경기력에 좌절했을 것이다)

Brown - 5.5: Offered little going forward. Had his hands full coping with the dangerous Petrov.

(공격력을 별로 보여주지 못했다. 위협적인 페트로프를 막기에는 역부족)

Ferdinand 5.5: Surprisingly off-colour display from the normally authoratative centre half. Nearly gifted City a third goal when needlessly giving away possession in the second half.

(평상시 믿을만했던 센터하프에서 놀랍게도 좋지않은 모습을 보여주었고 후반전에는 쓸데없이 볼을 내 주어 시티의 세번째골을 헌납할 뻔 했다)

Vidic - 5: Made one or two heroic interventions but his current dip in form mirrors that of the whole team. Played the last 10 minutes as a centre forward and was hardly more impressive.(한두번 영웅적인 가로막기를 보여주었으나  현재 그의 떨어진 폼이 팀전반 그것과 흡사하다. 마지막 10분 중앙 공격수처럼 플레이 하였으나 거의 인상적이지 못했다.) 

O'Shea - 5.5: Disappointing performance from the Irishman. Lacked the pace and imagination to support United’s attacking thrusts and looked vulnerable whenever City attacked down the flank.(아일랜드인의 실망스런 경기력. 패이스와 유나이티드의 공격 지원을 위한 기지가 부족했고 시티가 윙으로 공격해 올때마다 쉽게 무너져 보였다)

Giggs - 5: Poor and peripheral performance from the winger. Seldom found himself in synch with the rhythm of the match and contributed little to the few United attacks. Substitution would have been merciful.

(윙어로서 형편없었고 피상적인 경기력. 경기리듬에 녹아들지 못했으며 얼마 안되는 유나이티드 공격에 거의 기여가 없었다. 교체했었어야 했다)

Anderson - 7: The pick of United’s players. The young Brazilian was inexplicably substituted when he alone demonstrated the drive and urgency that the occasion warranted.(맨유의 mom.  알 수 없는 일이지만 그 홀로 추진력을 보여주며 그런 상황이 급박해 보였을 때 교체되었다.)

Scholes - 5.5: Another below-par performance from the usually reliable midfield general. Sat too deep for much of the game and all too often his passes were horizontal. When he did move further forward, Scholes contributed to United’s goal. Lucky to be starting on current form.(보통 믿을만한 미드필드 사령관에서 또 한번의 기대이하 경기력을 보임. 경기 대부분 너무 적극적이지 못했고 그의 패스는 너무 자주 횡패스였다. 그가 좀 더 공격적으로 움직여 유나이티드 골에 관여했다. 현재 폼으로 선발된 것은 운이 좋았다.)

Nani - 5: Another United forward player to be missing in action for most of the game. Failed to make any worthwhile impression in a game he will want to forget. (또 한명의 유나이티드 공격수는 경기 대부분 보이지 않았다. 어떠한 가치있는 것도 만들어 내는데 실패했고 그가 잊고 싶어하는 경기일 것이다)

Ronaldo - 5.5: Looks to be running on empty. The manager complained that he the winger had been overused on midweek international duty and it showed. Heavy-legged, the Portuguese star couldn’t get past the City defenders nor offer his usual spark and invention. (활기를 잃은듯이 보인다. 감독은 그가 주중 국댜 경기에 과도하게 쓰인 것에 불만을 토로했었고 그 결과가 보였다. 다리가 무거운 포르투갈 스타는 시티 수비수를 뚫지도 그의 평상시 번뜩이는 침투도 보여주지 못했다)

Tevez - 6.5: Showed the usual willing and energy. An acrobatic first half shot was well saved. Thereafter, the Argentine was marshalled effectively by City’s defenders.(평상시 의욕과 에너지를 보여주었다. 곡예같았던 전반전 슛이 잘 막혔다. 아르헨티나인은 시티의 수비수들에게 효과적으로 막혔다)

Substitutes:

Ji Sung Park - 5.5: Had little impact on the game.(경기에 별 영향을 주지 못했다)

Hargreaves - 5.5: Couldn’t improve on United’s disappointing midfield performance.(유나이티드의 실망스런 미드필드 경기력을 끌어올리지 못했다)

Carrick - 6: A good goal, but too little too late. Finally, a United midfielder on the score sheet other than Ronaldo.(좋은 골, 하지만 너무 늦었다. 결국 스코어 기록판에 로날도가 아닌 유나이티드 미드필더 이름이 올랐다)

MANCHESTER CITY  

Hart - 7: Excellent save from Tevez in first half. Relatively untroubled by United’s toothless attack.

Ball - 6.5: Kept Nani quiet and contributed to a disciplined defensive performance.

Dunne - 8: Towering performance in defence. When City needed a last man his name was Dunne

Richards - 7: Athletic, spirited but occasionally clumsy performance from the England man who might have conceded a penalty in the first half.

Onuoha - 6.5: Understated display. Didn’t push forward as much as City might have liked but was not found wanting when United attacked.

Fernandes - 6: Showed some neat touches and used the ball with intelligence before fading in the second half.

Hamann - 7: Used all the means leagally available, and a few more, to keep Manchester United in check. Howard Webb was perhaps a touch lenient with him, and he made the most of that to stamp his authority.

Ireland - 7: Effective midfield display. Got forward well and was instrumental in City’s first goal.

Petrov - 8.5: Tormented United in an excellent first half performance. The Bulgarian was at the heart of City’s dominance and was the creator of both goals.(전반전 뛰어난 경기력으로 유나이티드를 괴롭혔다. 이 불가리아인은 시티의 경기 장악 중심에 있었고 두 골 모두 만들어냈다)

Benjani - 6.5: Will enjoy the tape of his first derby performance. Showed willing as the lone raider and was rewarded with his goal.

Vassell - 7: Played his part in a famous victory. Worked hard for the team, and took his goal well.

Substitutes:

Caicedo 5: No impact on the proceedings.

Sun Jihai 5: Didn’t touch the ball in the eight minutes he was on the field.

http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=580888

[홍게]

페트로프 흠좀짱

[욘 헤이팅하]

골닷컴에서의 mom는 페트로프네 역시 두골 에 다 관여하고 ㄷㄷ 살인 왼발킥 능력 ㅎㄷㄷ epl에서 다섯손가락안에 들어갈만한 윙어 중하나가 페트로프라고 생각됨 왼쪽윙에서..

[새하얀 머그컵]

박지성오늘 꽤잘한거같은대 움직임도좋았구..만약 박지성이 잉글랜드사람이였으면 평점 더높았을듯..-_-;

[Maximilian Hecker]

오늘 나니는 진짜아니었던거같애요

[Essien]

스카이스포츠 평점보다 난듯

[설봐도]

지성이 들어온 몇분후에는 계속 반데사르 뻥축구만 하니;;

[아라가키 유이]

긱스 7점 ->5점이 되버리네

[세스크의스위트뮤직박스]

하늘운동보단 그나마 낫네..

[W..rooney]

박지성이 살짝 패스해준고 긱스가 너어줬다면 평점이 바꼇을텐데 스코어도 모를테고

[로망스맨]

이로써 스카이 운동 평점은 별 신뢰가 가지 못함이 증명됨

[Asamoah Gyan]

안데르손 7점 -> 5점