|
박: 송공,
전기차의 역사가 오래고, 상당한 수준의 기술발전이 이미 있었던 것으로 알고 있는데 ...
이젠, 경쟁력이 있는거요?
정부보조 이런거 빼면 유가가 어느정도일 때 똔똔일까?
메가트렌드를 전망하기가 쉽지 않을터이니, 천천히 그림 좀 그려주세요 ^^
Tesla, BYD, 삼성SDI, LG화학 등
* *
송: 내 사견으로는 전기자동차는 상품성이 많이 떨어진다고 보네. 즉, 사업적 가치가 없다고 생각해. 나의 파릇파릇한 생애 전부를 바쳤는데 결론이 그렇네.
테슬라의 미래에 대한 평가는 부정적이네.
원자력 자동차가 나올겨. 우라늄이 아닌 토륨을 연료로 하는...
* *
박: 화끈하네 ! 생각의 정리가 좀 필요하다.
이런 이야기를 어디서 듣나?
엘론 머스크가 엄청난 돈을 땡겨 설비투자한다고... 워렌 버핏은 BYD 투자를 선전하고 있잖아?
* *
송: 글쎄, 그거야 그 분들의 판단이니까...
그 판단의 근거가 무엇인지 내가 알 수는 없지만,
내 생각은 그래.
BYD는 여러번 방문도 했고 미팅도 여러번 했었어. 거기는 전기자동차를 자동차산업 진입의 디딤돌로 활용 하는겨. 궁극적으로는 휘발유 차량의 대량생산에 초점이 맞춰져 있는겨 ~
테슬라는 사업모델을 수정하고 있는 걸로 듣고 있어.
* *
박: 유가가 급락했기 때문에 전기차에 대해 비관적이 된 것은 아닌가?
송: 노웁. 배터리 문제에 답이 없어.
배터리 가격이 자동차 가격의 50%를 넘고 ...
* *
박: 전기저장 기술이 발전하면?
송: 그것 때문에 엘지화학에 조인했던건데 ...
차세대 배터리 개발에 매진했었는데, 결론은 한계를 극복할 수가 없어. 그래서 갈 곳은 원자력 에너지의 활용이라네. 여기 에너지성 담당관들 국립연구소 연구원들 세계의 주요 자동차회사 상품기획 담당하는 브레인들과의 수없이 많은 회의와 논쟁, 보고서, 그 후에 내려진 결론일세.
* *
박: 그렇구나.
송: 그런데 작은 규모의 사업, 즉 니치 마켓용으로는 그런대로 모르겠지만 지속성을 가진 사업이 되기는 어렵다고 봐.
* *
오늘의 대화는 상당히 의미가 있었다
땡큐 !!
/
/
배터리에 대한 기사 추가
TECH TESLA
Why Tesla's grid batteries will use two different chemistries
by Katie Fehrenbacher MAY 18, 2015, 10:42 AM EDT
E-mail Tweet Facebook Google Plus Linkedin
Share icons

Tesla Powerwall, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery designed to store energy at a residential level.
Courtesy of Tesla Motors
Here’s everything you ever wanted to know about battery chemistry, Tesla Motors, and its impact on the planned Gigafactory.
Buried within Tesla Motors’ hour-and-fifteen-minute earnings call earlier this month was the nugget that the electric automaker TSLA -0.12% plans to use two different variations of lithium-ion batteries for its two different grid battery products.
The news could easily be dismissed as just a bit of battery geekery, but there’s more to it than that. It suggests that Tesla is not just increasing how many types of batteries it uses in its products, but that it has the ability to produce both models at its planned battery “gigafactory.” The batteries could influence how the facility is designed.

But before we understand how much this could affect Tesla’s factory, let’s take a step back to explain the nuts and bolts of battery making and why Tesla wants to do this.
Lithium-ion battery basics
Most traditional lithium-ion batteries that are found in devices like cell phones are made using a cathode that’s a mixture of lithium cobalt oxide. The structure of a battery is made up of two electrodes—a cathode (positive) and an anode (negative)—and a medium, called the electrolyte, through which the electric charge flows. Lithium ions move back and forth between the cathode and the anode when a lithium-ion battery charges and discharges.
The cathode part of the battery is the place where traditionally the lithium-ion battery industry can tweak the energy and power density—or how much energy and power can be stored per volume. (Power is basically how quickly the energy can be taken out and put to work.) Different material combinations can make the battery able to store more energy or produce more power, and likewise make the battery more or less stable. (The energy created in a battery is, by its nature, volatile.)
The batteries that Tesla has been using, sourced from Panasonic, for its Model S electric car are mostly likely a lithium-ion battery with a cathode that is a combination of a lithium, nickel, cobalt, aluminum oxide. The battery industry calls this an “NCA battery” and they’ve been around—and made by Panasonic—for many years.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla.
Photograph by Ringo H.W. Chiu — AP
Typically, lithium-ion NCA batteries use a combination of 80% nickel, 15% cobalt and 5% aluminum. It’s unclear what mix Tesla and Panasonic’s battery combination is. (The anodes in these traditional lithium-ion batteries is usually a graphite combination, which acts as a host for the lithium ions.) The addition of the aluminum to the NCA battery makes it more stable.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on the company’s earnings call that Tesla will be using a high energy lithium-ion NCA battery for its new grid battery. Similar to the one it uses in its cars, the grid battery is intended for use by utility companies for back-up power. These are the batteries that, when used in a big battery “farm,” could replace so-called peaker power plants, the “dirty” and expensive power plants that utilities use only when grid demand peaks, such as during a sweltering summer afternoon. (The Tesla website describes this as the back-up battery with a capacity of 10 kilowatt-hours and a price of $3,500.)
In contrast, Musk said that Tesla will use a lithium-ion battery with a nickel, manganese, cobalt oxide cathode for its grid battery. Called an NMC battery, it’s meant to be used for daily cycling for a home, business, or certain types of clean power. “There’s quite a lot of manganese in there,” Musk said. (The Tesla website specs for this battery are 7 kWh battery for $3,000.)
Many traditional NMC batteries use one-third equal parts nickel, manganese, and cobalt. Again, it’s unclear what the combination of Panasonic and Tesla’s version is.
Different applications
The choice of these two batteries makes sense for what Tesla wants its customers to do with the batteries. The back-up battery is intended to offer a lot of energy, quickly, to smooth out that “heat wave” grid peak without using a peaker plant. It’s like when someone driving a Tesla Model S punches the accelerator.
On an electrical grid, these type of events rarely happen—but they do. A back-up battery doesn’t need to be charged and discharged on a regular daily basis, just when it’s really needed. Tesla says its battery has 60 or 70 cycles—charge and discharge—per year.

Construction of the Tesla Gigafactory outside Reno, Nevada is shown February 18, 2015.
Photograph by James Glover — Reuters
Musk optimistically says that the lifetime of that battery is 1,000 to 1,500 cycles, or “maybe 15 years calendar life.” Those numbers should be taken with a grain of salt—they are likely based on a situation in which the battery isn’t always using its full capacity.
Tesla’s daily charging grid battery, on the other hand, is meant to offer more reliable sustained charging every day. If you paired this battery with a utility’s solar energy farm, the batteries would be expected to store the energy from the solar panels during the day to potentially be used at night.
The daily battery can have a lower energy density, but it needs a longer cycle life—that is, it needs to be able to be charged and discharged many more times than the backup battery. The daily battery has a 5,000 cycle life, Musk said on the call, and a similar lifespan as the back-up battery—but again, take those numbers with a grain of salt.
An NCA battery typically has a shorter cycle life and a higher energy density (and less stability). An NMC battery generally has a longer cycle life, more stability, and less energy density.
Princeton University assistant professor Dan Steingart says the materials for most NMC batteries are generally slightly cheaper than for NCA batteries—there is more nickel and less cobalt used in the NMC battery. (Cobalt is more expensive than nickel.) But an NMC battery also typically has a lower cost of energy because of the ability of an NMC battery to cycle with more stability than an NCA battery.

Baton Rouge-based Albemarle has its sights on Lithium-ion batteries
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Remember: The more a battery is charged and discharged, the shorter the battery’s lifespan. But battery life can be extended if the batteries are not charged and discharged to 100 percent of their capacity. If the battery is charged at only half of its level, it can last much longer.
Steingart points out that to get the kind of life cycle that Tesla’s NMC battery plans for, it could be charging and discharging at under 80% of its capacity, and perhaps even down to somewhere between 50% to 70% depth of discharge. To get the type of lifespan for the NCA battery that Tesla wants, the company could be doing 80% to 85% depth of discharge. For NMC and NCA batteries in general, Steingart notes: “It’s a tricky dance of what the material is and how far you discharge and how you spec it out to be.”
The Gigafactory
Another reason why Tesla can use two different batteries for its two grid products is because its main battery supplier, Panasonic, makes these types of batteries at low costs. (As do others, such as Samsung SDI.) Since Tesla plans to build the first grid battery products before the Gigafactory is up and running—assembling them in Fremont similar to the way it makes its cars now—it can just buy these in the traditional way, from a vendor.
But if Tesla decides to keep this model of two different battery types and implements them into the construction of the Gigafactory, it could fundamentally alter the way Tesla builds its factory. On Tesla’s earnings call Tesla chief technology officer JB Straubel said both batteries could be built in the Gigafactory and confirmed that Tesla will have multiple lines operating in the facility.
“If one is nickel cobalt aluminum, and the other is nickel manganese, cobalt, that’s fine. The processes after that is identical,” said Straubel. Musk added that the packs would “look the same at the module and pack level”—just differ at the battery cell level.
Adding complexity to manufacturing processes typically adds costs. If there are two types of battery cells, then the total production of each cell type is naturally half of what it would be if the factory was just producing one cell type. That could be important because the Gigafactory is looking to lower battery costs through economies of scale that come with very large volumes.
But Tesla is well known for innovating around fundamental manufacturing, too, so it’s hard to tell just how much complexity would be added with two cathode chemical mixtures. Though battery manufacturing isn’t just about swapping one chemical mixture for another, sometimes different batteries need to have materials loaded in differently to optimize the power of the battery.
Tesla has also long said that it intends to be flexible if other battery chemistries and types—including advanced next-generation batteries—emerge on the market that are better than the standard lithium-ion batteries. Having two lines, with different chemical mixtures in there at the start, could ultimately be a way for Tesla to remain flexible to
첫댓글 Tesla's Battery Grabbed $800 Million in Its First Week
♡♡
Tesla is already building a 5-million-square-foot battery factory. It's not big enough.
That was the message from Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk this week while discussing, for the first time, the early response to his new product line of storage batteries designed for use in homes and businesses. The numbers are impressive. In the first few days of reservations since the battery announcement on April 30, Tesla took orders worth roughly $800 million in potential revenue, according to figures compiled by Bloomberg Business.
If those numbers were realized, it would be almost as much as the company took in from car sales in the entire first quarter of 2015. "It's like crazy off-the-hook," Musk said during an earnings presentation on Wednesday. "The sheer volume of demand here is just staggering."