|
A browser-based interface for entering self-assessment items
Subjective and system-proposed difficulty for each item
Score normalization based on Rasch model conventions
Manual θ (ability level) input
Routine generation from score-difficulty mismatches
Local storage persistence
Text-based reporting
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 – Diagram of UI layout for item, score, delta, and theta entry
Figure 2 – Logical flowchart for discrepancy analysis and routine recommendation
Figure 3 – Sample chart visualizing ability versus difficulty comparisons
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
System Components:
Input interface with fields for:
Task name
User score (1–5)
Subjective delta (user’s perceived difficulty)
Objective delta (estimated from system or dataset)
Score direction (positive/negative)
JavaScript engine that computes normalized score: ±2 scale
Discrepancy engine comparing normalized score and delta gap
Optional θ input field
Tagging engine assigning routines based on logic rules
Data visualization through Chart.js
Text generator summarizing results
LocalStorage interaction for saving/loading sessions
User Interaction Flow:
User inputs data via the form
System analyzes and generates routine recommendations:
Self-Underrating → Strength Awareness
Emotional Interference → Emotional Regulation
Cognitive Distortion → Meta-Cognitive Insight
Comparison of θ and δ yields difficulty interpretation
Data stored locally and optionally rendered as text summary
CLAIMS
A method for self-reflective assessment using Rasch principles incorporating free-form task entry and user-defined difficulty.
A score normalization engine aligning with Rasch measurement conventions.
A rule-based system assigning reflective routines based on scoring patterns.
Optional ability parameter input and comparison with item difficulty.
Local browser data persistence with visualization and text summary.
ABSTRACT
A system and method for personal development and self-evaluation using Rasch-based models. Enables subjective difficulty input, θ score comparison, and improvement routine recommendations. Combines visualization, textual reporting, and local storage in a unified reflective loop.
End of Formatted Specification