2010년 11월 1일 월요일 발표문

[임연주]

 We read the paper by Lee je-chang who was a senior of Christian-philosophy. He want to say that as compare classic art between modern art, then definite the art. So he search for the possible of set a criterion of art. I think it is possible. But the art consist in subjectivity and objectivity. The classic art was so closed. The ruling class had been enjoyed the art. General people didn't know what art is it. But the art was been casual in the post-modernism. It is not strange that ordinary person enjoy the art, for example, appreciating the paint, listening the classic music and so on. It is possible that many people admire the art. I rethink popularization of art, then I'll study whether it's a good or bad.

 First, what is the definition of beauty? The study of aesthetics had been started that what the beuty is. The beginning of used 'Aesthetics' in 18th century. Modernism was the idea that the beauty of reason. Normativeof the work by modernist aesthetics is narrative only leave a void that was eventually removed. Avant-Gardethe is 19th century and early 20th century took place in the social turmoil and ideological struggle to escape from violent and universal desire to be able to refer generally to the art leads will be presented. Good and evil, beauty standards, according to the relative concept of Dadaism, or tell the entire story will garner a simple language.

 According to Shin kuk-won, Fundamentally changed the imagination of postmodern art is dependent on the above. Natural beauty and the beauty of classical art over the reason has imitated it. In contrast, subjective vision and sensibility of modern artists have created artificially by the beauty. The aim of classic art, modern art was the human effort to reach more than absolutely had to. Eventually the failure of this attempt by the postmodern opportunity was overlooked. Postmodern art is more than absolute beauty, to give up personal plunged into the world of imagination. Modern art, who led the late '60s with the advent of Pop Art celebrated the end. The subsequent postmodern pluralism should represent the artistic sensibility. Post-modern art, modern abstract art and other world-oriented to restructure the surreal expression‎ism.

 So, Now distinguish between art and non-art were unable to find any criteria. According dantoe American philosopher of art, the result 'the end of art' and now must accept the art world, pursuit of this end.

 I'm in agreement up to that point. But if the art have no standard, that art would be created by anyone. Dickie, George say art that belong to the system, something that someone nominated for the artistic appreciation of art, whatever it is you. But Modern art works, because the absolute denial of normative regulation of the quality of the artists and the arts have to rely on authority. And Art is not any external or forcing should be defined by its value completely.

 Theory of society to put in the center of the primary social value of art is an aesthetic fact. According to this position must be present for the art community. They argued to it is not art that don't include social problems. I agree that, but the best of art is good itself.

 Lippard say art critic and conceptual art, conceptual art, pure art are most by this system by dismantling an oppressive culture, art, daily life of the public are seen as having a utopian nature. A representation of a conceptual artist in the main target is no longer doubt that the world rather than presupposing that enable the world is the art itself. The world always be here, rather than the nature itself with its own understanding of the situation and says that the ideology was to be reinterpreted. Conceptual art is art that has had a positive impact on the survival but not least, the arts and non-art of division to deny the reality of art that could hold clues to the last is significant.

 Their art is 'a negation of art' is art for. In general, since these aestheticians pop art is said to be falling to the end. The purpose of Pop Art emerged in the early 1960s breakup of the traditional aesthetics of art, entertainment. Pop art to give meaning to the environment and doing his own way in everything around him such as the environment is to accept the logic of. Pop art is not recognized by the creation of art to pursue. Pop Art emerged in the art world that has made all. Elitism of art, pop art was broken for the existence of art in itself is significant, but resulted in a crisis.

 However, I do feel that the art is still difficult. Because it is difficult to interpret, especially pop art seems more difficult. Still know about the art work to accept a person thinks that the easy part.