7,8월 1주차 2번~7번

[요세비]

2.

(3a) is ungrammatical since the NP 'his fring-pan' is an argument of the predicate 'persuade' which selects a rational entity as its object or its argument, but the argument 'his frying -pan' is not a rational being. (3b) is grammatical because the NP

'his frying-pan' is an arguemnt of the predicate 'indispensable' in the embedded clause.

3.

The underlined pridicates above should select an animated entity as its argument in the subject position.

4.

The sentece (c), (e) and (f) show the same pattern as sentece (1) because the subjects of the sentences acquire

 its thematic role from the predicate of its complement clause respectively.

 5.

The sentence (b), (e) and (f) are (1b)-type because the subjects in the senteces were selected by the prdicate of the main

 clause, but the subjects in the other senteces were selected by the predicate of the lower clause.

7.

The NP 'John" originated in the postverbal position because thhe predicate 'seem' is an one-place predicate. The subject 'John"  and the object 'the race' in the lower clause are assigned a thematic role from the verb 'win'. The NP 'the race' can be

assigned case from the predicate 'win', but the NP 'John" cannot be assigned case from the non-finite verb, so it moves to

 the subject postion of main clause to get case.

[이동걸]

#2. 마지막에 consider는 동사위 NP에 선택제약을 가하지 않는다 라는 내용을 추가하면 좋겠습니다. Selection restriction does not hold between 'consider' and ' his frying-pan',

[이동걸]

#7. ... originated in the postverbal position -> postverbal position이 두 군데 있습니다. 명확하게 하셔야 합니다. postverbal position of the verb 'seem'.
the NP 'John" cannot be assigned case from the non-finite verb ->이 부분 많이 혼동 하십니다. John이 비시제절 동사로 부터 격할당을 못받는게 아니라 'to' of the non-finite clause로 부터 받지 못합니다. 동사가 아니라 'to'로 부터 못받는것을 정확히 해 주셔야 해요~

(좋은 답안은 첨삭하지 않았습니다.)

[요세비]

감사합니다^^