5. President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated.

[박상구현덕]

Constitutional Institutions that Deceived the People
Destroyed Constitutional Order of the Republic of Korea
The Starting Point and Destination of the Illegal
Impeachment of Our President
The National Report Dissecting the Bare Face of




The Culprit of Illegal Impeachment
Are they our Country's Constitutional Institutions?










Why did the Republic of Korea
Commit Illegal Impeachment?






This book is about the Illegal Impeachment of President Park, GeunHye of the Republic of Korea to protect the constitutional order of the Republic of Korea for truth and the definition of the Impeachment Nullification focusing on the various illegal disposition of the constitutional institutions by notifying the public widely that the illegal impeachment was extremely inappropriate and absurd.






The Patriotic Constitutional Guard
of the Republic of Korea




.

.


Why did the Republic of Korea Commit Illegal Impeachment?


CONTENTS
          
1. Report on the Illegal Impeachment and Its Nullity to the Public 


2. Justice and Truth must NOT be Neglected! 


3. Living People's Sovereign Guard in the Republic of Korea's Constitutional Suicide 


4. Substantial Sovereignty of the People by the Struggle 


5. President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated. 


6. Continuation of Illegal Torts for Ruining Country 


7. Illegal Tyranny of Prosecutors and Special Prosecutors 

5. President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated.

President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated. The Ruining Illegal Fake Republic, a Joint Venture of Crooked Legal Intellectuals.

The 19th presidential election, which was held for the president who had never been vacated from office due to the illegal impeachment, was also an election that had no legal cause. So it was null and void.

The National Election Commission (Chairman Kim YongDeok, who served as chief justice from Sept 6, 2016 to Dec 26, 2017) did not understand the clear jurisprudence that President Park, GeunHye, the respondent of the impeachment trial, was not impeached under the Constitution and laws of the Republic of Korea. On May 9, 2017, the presidential election was held illegally due to the erroneous judgment on the illegal impeachment.

Whenever the plaintiffs, the Constitutional Guard claim that the presidential election that made Moon JaeIn a fake president is invalid, we have argued that the election itself is invalid under the Public Official Election Act.

It was an erroneous election conducted by mistake as the President was not in the vacancy. She was vacated due to vicious illegal actions of the National Assembly and the constitutional court prior to the election.

Some may say, "Even though the cause is invalid, isn't the president elected by a presidential election?" However, Moon JaeIn cannot be a legitimate president because of the clear legal reason that an election to elect a new president cannot be held with the President who has not been vacated by the Constitution due to illegal impeachment that has not followed the law. This principle is no different for Yoon, SeokYeol, the successor of the illegal regime.

The presidential election was executed by mistake due to the misunderstanding of the law. As it is the illegal impeachment trial, the presidential dismissal could not occur. It is very natural and justified that the principle of invalidity of cause, which is an extra-regulatory factor unrelated to the Public Official Election Act, should be applied to the judgment of invalidation of impeachment.

According to the provisions of the Public Official Election Act and the principle of invalidity of cause, we the plaintiffs bolded and underlined the font on the documents submitted to the court regarding this issue. However, the most courts in this country did not see this. It was common among the stupid judgment that ignored it, but drew up the absurd stipulation that an invalidation lawsuit must be brought to the Supreme Court within 30 days from the election day.

Constitutional institutions of the Republic of Korea are contaminated with illegal impeachment, and other public authorities are still protecting such illegal impeachment as follows;

▼ The National Assembly

① The impeachment proceedings were decided without any evidence to impeach the President.

② During the impeachment trial, the complaint was submitted without permission.

▼ The constitutional court

③ Even in violation of ① and ② above, it infringed the National Assembly’s right to vote on impeachment.

④ It avoided appointment of judges scheduled for vacancies and not forming a full tribunal.

⑤ The vacancy tribunal went beyond the right of trial and exercised the right to determine without authority.

⑥ It used illegally collected evidence in the impeachment trial.

⑦ The constitutional court “teachered the creation of false public documents” to change the prosecution clause.

⑧ When the act was committed, it was applied retrospectively to the law to be enforced thereafter.

⑨ It was an illegal judgment against the general principles of the Constitution and the law.

⑩ It was a total illegal impeachment without impartiality and judges' independence.

▼ The National Election Commission

⑪ held an invalid presidential election which the President was not vacated due to the illegal impeachment.

⑫ issued the presidential election certificate to the elected candidate with such invalid reasons.

▼ Moon JaeIn, who ruled the country illegally as a fake president and rebelled

⑬ He committed a “hierarchical obstruction of the execution of official duties” to run for the presidential election.

⑭ As a general entity of illegality, he is the head of the state rebellion who deceived the people.

⑮ Under his unlawful rule, the President of the Republic of Korea Park, GeunHye was arrested, investigated and detained.

⑯ As a fake illegal president, he ruled illegally for five years.

According to the Administrative Litigation Act of the Republic of Korea, even if it is a decision of the constitutional court, it is clear in the law that illegal impeachment that violates the compulsory provisions of the public law as mentioned above and disturbs the national Constitution is subject to the lawsuit to be tried in the court.

The deplorable five years of illegal rule by Moon JaeIn, the fake president of this illegal fake republic, was made by the lawyers of this country, and the ignorance and cowardice silence of countless other lawyers until the “era of extortion” by the illegal and fake regime increased the countless calamities. This subservient silence cannot tell how much more misery we will regret later.

Although the constitutional court, one of the constitutional institutions of the Republic of Korea, is not included in the judiciary system, the knowledge of the law of this country has positioned the constitutional court as the supreme institution of the judiciary, and even the constitutional court has made the decision of impeachment as the supreme judicial institution deceptively. We even saw the level of knowledge of the country's disastrous legal knowledge, which even gave false answers in the case of invalidation of the impeachment against the plaintiffs of the Constitutional Guard.

The constitutional court is not a judicial body. Therefore, regardless of the outcome of the constitutional court, citizens can have a trial in a formal judicial institution. In other words, it guarantees the people's right to a further trial.

The critical ignorance is that the highest organ of the judiciary is the constitutional court. Thus the decision of the constitutional court to dismiss the President at will is absolute abuse of power. The sovereign people after the dismissal of President Park have nothing to expect anymore from constitution. In fact, the May 9 presidential election in 2017 was held against the Constitution. The same is true against the Constitution in the presidential election in which Yun, SeokYeol was elected on March 9, 2022.

It is ignorant to accept the President's sentence of dismissal by misunderstanding the constitutional court as the supreme judicial body of the Republic of Korea. Who is responsible for plunging these 50 million people into the national legal erroneous conception?

After the dismissal of illegal impeachment, the world just gave up as “ex-President Park, GeunHye.” In response to the unfortunate and tragic facts, the Constitutional Guard has continued to fight lawsuits and accusations by revealing every single evidence of illegal impeachment and we were eligible to inform the public of these erroneous legal errors.

With the total ignorance of the laws of the Republic of Korea, the illegal and fake president Moon could finish the term five years in the country. It is lamentable that people do not even know these illegal facts, or unable to speak because they are afraid. This situation, the criminal is being respected as a courtesy of the former president, is truly a shameful international disgrace.

Indeed, despite the humiliating national crisis, there is no lawyer to help the Constitutional Guard because they are afraid of the powerful living injustice. Even in the condition, our impeachment invalidation lawsuit has been filed more than 40 times, and the clamor of more than 500 unbroken plaintiffs and the eyes of justice are still shining despite the long years of struggle.

Despite the disappointment of not knowing where to find justice in the conscience of these irresponsible and cowardice lawyers, several senior lawyers who served as former Supreme Court justices and Constitutional judges, including Attorney Kim PyongWoo, who participated in the impeachment trial as the spokesman for President Park; he boldly and sharply pointed out the errors of the illegal impeachment.

The elder lawyers who pointed out the impeachment are as follows: Kim, DooHyeon, Jung KiSeung, Lee SeJoong, Hah HamHo, Kim JongPyo, Lee SiYoon, Kim MoonHoe and Kim PyongWoo. On the newspaper (ChoSunIlBo Feb 9, 2017 P1 Bottom), they publicly presented their opinion on the legal flaws in the impeachment trial of President Park.

“Regardless of likes or dislikes President Park, GeunHye, we want to help the constitutional court to decide by revealing our legal views as purely legal experts,” they said. Six points of opinion were expressed using paid advertisement in the newspaper. Below is the full text of the “lawyers’ opinion on the impeachment trial” presented as the advertisement.

◤1. Korea has a very unique system in which the impeachment prosecution by the National Assembly itself alone suspends the authority of the respondent, that is, President Park, and in fact, the impeachment effect occurs first. Thus, there should be sufficient preparatory procedures for the impeachment decision to be made only with the evidence and precedents presented at the time of the impeachment prosecution. However, in this impeachment, the National Assembly decided to impeach only from newspaper articles and heartfelt testimony, without any evidence investigation process or precedent collection process and suspended President Park's power. This is the critical unconstitutionality that goes against the rule of law and the principle of due process of our constitution, which requires a trial of evidence.

2. In particular, the resolution and handling of the impeachment prosecution before the special prosecutor's investigation began in earnest reveals that this impeachment was handled abnormally and hastily.

3. It is also the serious violation of due process to vote collectively without individual deliberation and voting on the 13 grounds for impeachment with completely different legal characteristics. This impeachment must be distinguished from the impeachment of president Roh Moo-hyun, who had several grounds for impeachment that were substantial (violation of the Election Neutrality Act). In particular, in the process of this impeachment discussion, a significant number of lawmakers expressed their opposition to the Sewol ferry issue. Thus, it is considered that there is the serious flaw in the legitimacy of the vote.

4. President Park has never denied or opposed the principles or principles of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Thus, it is a leap of logic to claim that it is a violation of the Constitution on the basis of a few fragmentary violations of the law or allegations of improper business execution.

5. There are many precedents for the presidential establishment of a public foundation and the act of receiving donations from corporations as its basic assets. Since the purpose is for the public interest, condemning it as a criminal act is against precedent and legal principle of the public foundation.

6. As the constitutional court requires all nine judges to participate in the hearings as a constitutional principle, the institutions involved in the process of appointing the head of the constitutional court and the judges will succeed to chief justice Park HanCheol who retired on January 31, 2017 and justice Lee, JeongMi who was to retire on March 13, 2017. They must have been replaced promptly to observe the constitutional spirit of the participation of all nine judges.

For the above reasons, the constitutional court needs to suspend the trial temporarily for a fair trial procedure that earns the trust of the people. Then resume the trial and proceed with the trial after the formation of all defect-free tribunals. ◢

We are very grateful for this very reasonable and grateful comments, and were able to gain a lot of courage as the Constitutional Guard is fighting for the law.

#Report #Illegal #Impeachment #Nullity #Public #korea #President #seoul #Park-GeunHye #war #constitution #law #publish #book
#litigation #ceo #assembly #anniversary #gratitude #devote #Design #person #legal #nullification #institution #litigation #principle #justice
#struggle #people #commander #democracy #economic #atom #plaintiff # discuss #endless #debate #rights #examin #fight #sports #coronavirus #civil #ngo #emergency #disaster #relief #funds #judgment #accordance #admin #memory #exercise #natural