말초신경의 재생 탐구!! 2021년 논문

[문형철]

Semin Plast Surg

. 2021 Sep 10;35(3):204–210. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731630

Peripheral Nerve Healing: So Near and Yet So Far

Aslan Baradaran 1, Hassan El-Hawary 1, Johnny Ionut Efanov 2, Liqin Xu 1,✉

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

PMCID: PMC8432994  PMID: 34526869

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries represent a considerable portion of chronic disability that especially affects the younger population. Prerequisites of proper peripheral nerve injury treatment include in-depth knowledge of the anatomy, pathophysiology, and options in surgical reconstruction. Our greater appreciation of nerve healing mechanisms and the development of different microsurgical techniques have significantly refined the outcomes in treatment for the past four decades. This work reviews the peripheral nerve regeneration process after an injury, provides an overview of various coaptation methods, and compares other available treatments such as autologous nerve graft, acellular nerve allograft, and synthetic nerve conduits. Furthermore, the formation of neuromas as well as their latest treatment options are discussed.

요약

말초 신경 손상은 

만성 장애의 상당 부분을 차지하며 

특히 젊은 인구에 영향을 미칩니다. 

적절한 말초 신경 손상 치료의 전제 조건에는 

해부학, 병리 생리학 및 외과적 재건 옵션에 대한 

심층적인 지식이 포함됩니다. 

신경 치유 메커니즘에 대한 이해가 높아지고 

다양한 미세 수술 기법이 개발되면서 

지난 40년 동안 치료 결과가 크게 개선되었습니다. 

이 연구에서는 

손상 후 말초 신경 재생 과정을 검토하고, 

다양한 피복 방법에 대한 개요를 제공하며, 

자가 신경 이식, 

무세포 신경 동종 이식, 

합성 신경 도관과 같은 다른 치료법을 비교합니다. 

또한 

신경종의 형성과 최신 치료 옵션에 대해서도 설명합니다.

Keywords: peripheral nerve, injury, repair, review

---

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common condition that often affects a younger and otherwise healthy individual, with 83% of the patients being under 55 years old and an equal male to female ratio. 1 It is estimated that approximately 5% of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center have a PNI. 2 Common etiologies include penetrating trauma, crush, ischemia, and traction, while injuries from electric shock and vibration are less frequent. 3 Their typical symptoms are sensory/motor function deficits that could result in the development of intractable neuropathic pain, with devastating impacts on patients' quality of life. Multiple factors predict the outcome after a peripheral nerve repair including age, gender, materials utilized, repair time, type of nerve injured, defect size, and duration of follow-up. 4

The peripheral nervous system has regenerative potential. However, for optimal healing to occur, an appropriate environment must be provided physiologically or surgically. In this article, we review the peripheral nervous system response to injury, and discuss surgical repair options and their applications.

말초 신경 손상(PNI)은

건강한 젊은 층에서도 흔히 발생하는 흔한 질환으로,

환자의 83%가 55세 미만이며 남성과 여성의 비율이 비슷합니다. 1

레벨 1 외상 센터에 입원한 전체 환자 중

약 5%가 PNI를 앓고 있는 것으로 추정됩니다. 2

일반적인 원인으로는 관통성 외상, 압착, 허혈, 견인 등이 있으며,

전기 충격과 진동으로 인한 부상은 덜 빈번합니다. 3

전형적인 증상은

감각/운동 기능 결손으로

난치성 신경병증성 통증으로 발전하여

환자의 삶의 질에 치명적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

나이, 성별, 사용된 재료, 수리 시간, 손상된 신경의 유형, 결함 크기, 추적 관찰 기간 등

여러 요인이 말초 신경 수리 후 결과를 예측합니다. 4

말초 신경계는

재생 가능성이 있습니다.

그러나

최적의 치유가 이루어지려면

생리적 또는 수술적으로 적절한 환경이 제공되어야 합니다.

이 도움말에서는 부상에 대한 말초 신경계의 반응을 살펴보고 수술적 치료 옵션과 그 적용에 대해 설명합니다.

Peripheral Nerve Injury Classification

Classically, after a focal injury to the peripheral nerve, one of two consequences to the axon is observed: conduction block or axonal degeneration. 5 In the former, the axon remains anatomically intact; the conduction of action potentials is blocked in the zone of injury, while it persists distal to it. In this case, if the underlying cause (i.e., ischemia, traction) is removed, spontaneous recovery is expected. On the other hand, in a nerve transection, axonal degeneration happens through Wallerian degeneration, 6 7 a rapid and active process which takes place in the distal nerve stump secondary to separation of the nerve axon from its cell body. Nerve recovery in a degenerative lesion depends on the basal lamina preservation. In other words, if the basal lamina remains intact, the proximal axon may grow in an organized fashion into the distal tube once the insulting injury is eliminated. However, when there is an interruption in the basal lamina, spontaneous regeneration will not be organized or may not occur at all.

In 1943, Seddon et al proposed three fundamentally distinct groups of PNIs. He coined the terms neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis. Neuropraxia refers to a nerve conduction block, axonotmesis refers to a degenerative injury with an intact continuous basal lamina, and neurotmesis indicates nerve injury leading to disruption of the basal lamina. 8 In 1951, Sunderland 9 refined this classification and introduced five types of PNI based on increasing severity of damage to the nerve structure. Mackinnon and Dellon 10 introduced a sixth injury pattern that combines any of the Sunderland's classes and therefore variable degrees of recovery is witnessed ( Table 1 ). A Type 2 or greater Sunderland PNI presents a diagnostic and decision-making challenge, as Wallerian degeneration and subsequent nerve scarring begins within 48 to 72 hours following injury. 11 12 For a nerve to fully regenerate, axons are required to grow in an antegrade fashion within the endoneurial tube. However, in the presence of excessive intraneural fibrosis, normal neural migration and growth can be delayed or diverted. 11 13

말초 신경 손상 분류

일반적으로 말초 신경의 국소 손상 후에는

축삭에 전도 차단 또는

축삭 변성이라는 두 가지 결과 중 하나가 관찰됩니다. 5

수초손상

축삭손상

절단...

전자의 경우 축삭은

해부학적으로 손상되지 않고

손상 부위에서는 활동 전위의 전도가 차단되지만

그 원위에서는 지속됩니다.

이 경우 근본적인 원인(예: 허혈, 견인)이 제거되면 자연적인 회복이 기대됩니다.

반면에 신경 절제술에서는

신경 축삭이 세포체에서 분리된 후 원위 신경 그루터기에서

이차적으로 일어나는 빠르고 활발한 과정인 월러리안 변성을 통해 축삭 퇴행이 일어납니다6 7.

퇴행성 병변의 신경 회복은 기저층 보존에 달려 있습니다.

즉,

기저층이 온전하게 보존되어 있으면

손상 부위가 제거된 후 근위 축삭이 원위 관으로 조직적으로 성장할 수 있습니다.

그러나

기저층이 중단되면 자

발적인 재생이 조직화되지 않거나 전혀 일어나지 않을 수 있습니다.

1943년 Seddon 등은 근본적으로 다른 세 가지 PNI 그룹을 제안했습니다.

그는 neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis 이라는 용어를 만들었습니다.

신경 이완은 신경 전도 차단을, 축삭 이완은 손상되지 않은 연속적인 기저층을 가진 퇴행성 손상을, 신경 이완은 기저층의 파괴를 초래하는 신경 손상을 나타냅니다. 8 1951년 선덜랜드9는 이 분류를 세분화하여 신경 구조의 손상 정도에 따라 5가지 유형의 PNI를 도입했습니다. 맥키넌과 델론 10은 선덜랜드의 분류를 결합한 여섯 번째 부상 패턴을 도입하여 다양한 수준의 회복을 목격할 수 있습니다( 표 1 ). 유형 2 이상의 선덜랜드 PNI는 부상 후 48~72시간 이내에 월러리안 변성과 그에 따른 신경 흉터가 시작되기 때문에 진단 및 의사 결정에 어려움이 있습니다. 11 12 신경이 완전히 재생되려면 축삭이 내신경관 내에서 통합적인 방식으로 성장해야 합니다. 그러나 과도한 신경 내 섬유화가 존재하면 정상적인 신경 이동과 성장이 지연되거나 우회될 수 있습니다. 11 13

Table 1. Classification of nerve injuries.

SeddonSunderlandInjuryRecoveryNeed for surgical repair

Neuropraxia	Type 1	Focal demyelination and conduction block. No WD	Complete	No
	Type 2	Axonal discontinuity + WD	Complete - up to 12 wk	No
Axonotmesis	Type 3	Axonal and endoneurial disruption + WD	Partial - up to 12 wk	Yes/No
	Type 4	Perineurial rupture with fascicle disruption + WD	None	Yes
Neurotmesis	Type 5	Nerve truck discontinuity + WD	None	Yes
	Mackinnon Type 6	Mixed	Some	Yes

Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: WD, Wallerian degeneration.

While crush and traction injuries may leave nerves in continuity, penetrating injuries can be more complex. They can present as isolated nerve transection, or be associated with crush and traction. These mixed lesions may obscure the diagnosis. While Sunderland introduced an elaborate system of classifying injury, clinically, it is simpler to categorize the injury to “degenerative” and “nondegenerative,” as this is the more important question that should be initially answered by the peripheral nerve surgeon.

약어: WD, 월러리안 변성.
압착 및 견인 손상은 신경을 연속적으로 남길 수 있지만, 관통 손상은 더 복잡할 수 있습니다. 이러한 손상은 고립된 신경 절단으로 나타나거나 압착 및 견인 손상과 연관되어 나타날 수 있습니다. 이러한 혼합 병변은 진단을 모호하게 할 수 있습니다. 선덜랜드는 정교한 손상 분류 시스템을 도입했지만, 임상적으로는 말초 신경 외과의가 초기에 답변해야 하는 더 중요한 질문이므로 '퇴행성'과 '비퇴행성'으로 부상을 분류하는 것이 더 간단합니다.

Repair Cascade

When the continuity of a peripheral nerve is interrupted, its distal and proximal ends retract, and Schwann cells in both stumps orchestrate an inflammatory response that clears the debris and begins the process of neuronal remodeling. 14

Proximal to the injury, Schwann cells de-differentiate and transform from a myelinating supporting role to a progenitor-like cell and become repair cells. 15 These cell changes, characterized by the downregulation of the myelin protein, and upregulation of growth-promoting factors, 16 17 18 are triggered by the injury signal 19 or by axonal signal loss. 20 A retrograde signal is sent to the nucleus to stimulate the transcription factors in the injured neuron. 21 In particular nerves, the length of axons presents a special challenge, as these signals have to travel more than 50 cm to reach the nucleus. 20

On the other end, tube-like structures (bands of Büngner) are formed at the distal stump, which act as “channels” to direct the regenerating axons back to their original targets. In the case of a transection, however, guidance of axons into the bands of Büngner will be more complex. 22 The two stumps are joint by a “bridge” of inflammatory cells and matrix, 23 which does not provide sufficient directional capacity for axonal regrowth. Schwann cells become responsible for guiding the axons across this bridge region. 24 While Schwann cells from both proximal and distal nerve stumps migrate until they bridge the gap, Schwann cells from the proximal stump attract the growing axons. Fibroblasts organize this migration at the wound level, via ephrinB/EphB2 signaling, which gives Schwann cells an adhesive behavior necessary for their orchestrated migration. 24 Macrophages respond to the hypoxia created within the bridge and secrete vascular endothelial growth factor A, which triggers vascularization within the bridging zone. 23 This neovascularization acts as tracks, guiding Schwann cells to cross the bridge, directing the sprouting axons to the distal stump. With vascularization begins a crucial part that guides Schwann cell migration; when this system is disrupted, the blood vessels may misdirect Schwann cells to grow into surrounding tissues, and suboptimal healing inevitably occurs. 23 24

Muscle Reinnervation and Motor Unit Territories

Cross-section of motor nerves branching is similar to cross-section of a tree and its roots. Motor nerves begin to branch within the intramuscular nerve sheath of their destined skeletal muscle. 25 This branching takes the nerve to various muscle fascicles. Motor units are territories of all muscle fibers that are innervated by one motor neuron. These spatial territories specify the number of muscle fibers reinnervated by a nerve after injury. 26 27 28 The number of muscle fibers in each motor unit has a direct correlation with the size of the unit territory; in a muscle cross-section, this territory can take up to 30% of the surface area. 26

If reinnervation is provided shortly postinjury, motor units will not significantly reduce in number. 15 On the other hand, if a muscle suffers from prolonged denervation, the number of motor units will drastically drop, affecting the structure and function of the reinnervated muscle. 29 In chronic denervation, the intramuscular portion of the nerve sheath can no longer support the regenerating axons. 15 Other contributing factors have been recognized, namely reduced number of Schwann cells and failure to maintain their regenerative role, disintegration of muscle spindles, 30 irreversible atrophy, and muscle fiber necrosis. 31 32 All these factors contribute to unsatisfactory functional recovery.

Functional Recovery after Nerve Injury

A functional recovery signifies a nerve has regained its physiologic state preinjury. This is largely dependent on three major factors: reinnervation of the end organ, timing of the injury, and distance to target organ.

To facilitate reinnervation, a nerve repair must primarily guide the regenerating axons to their original endoneurial tubes. 33 Motor and sensory nerves can find their correct path to a motor unit or sensory dermatome, respectively. Despite this capacity, motor fibers occasionally fail to follow their respective pathway and, consequently, fibers never meet the preinjury target organ. 34 This misdirection can happen even after surgical repair of a nerve, which poses a major long-term functional deficit. 35 36

Although sensory nerves reinnervate their specific organs, it is unlikely for them to reach their original mechanoreceptor. With a portion of healing consisting of misguided afferent fibers, misinterpretation of tactile stimuli and poorly localized sensation may occur. This is observed in patients with severe brachial plexus injury, in particular patients who report “wrong-way” sensation. 37 Similarly, the efferent motor fibers may reinnervate a different muscle. This has a particular clinical importance following complete transection of large mixed sensory and motor nerves. Random reinnervation was observed in patients' hand muscles after surgical approximation of a transected ulnar nerve at the wrist, and result in simultaneous antagonistic muscles contractions. 38

While the regeneration of sensory nerves can still happen with delayed repairs over months to years, 39 the timing of reinnervation is particularly important for motor nerves, as the regenerated nerve must make contact with its denervated target (i.e., motor endplate) in a timely manner. 15 40 In motor nerves, a significant delay in regeneration becomes a major challenge to functional recovery. 15 40 41 In chronic denervation, newly generated axons approach the motor endplate of the target muscle, but cannot form functional connections or synapses. 42 This is possibly due to the irresponsive Schwann cells in the end plate that no longer support reinnervation. This is observed clinically in patients with complete brachial plexus palsy with almost no functional recovery in repairs delayed beyond 12 months following injury, whereas patients with an operative delay of 6 months or less have significantly better return of biceps function. 43 Delayed presentation further complicates the clinical assessment and decision-making for the appropriate treatment course. The current consensus is that if reinnervation is not expected to have occurred within 12 to 18 months postinjury, the neuromuscular junctions degenerate, precluding any future reinnervation. 3 44 45 46 47 It is generally recommended to consider functional reconstruction for patients presenting after this cutoff and to avoid nerve repair since reports have clearly demonstrated its dismal outcomes. 48 The distance to target organ reinnervation goes hand-in-hand with the timing of reinnervation and plays another important role in functional recovery. Axons regenerate at a relatively constant rate of 1 mm per day, or one inch per month, and usually can be followed clinically with an advancing Tinel sign. 49 Hence, in a proximal motor nerve injury (e.g., above-elbow ulnar nerve laceration) where the distance to motor target reinnervation exceeds the estimated 12 months period, other strategies such as distal baby sitter nerve transfers (e.g., anterior interosseous to distal ulnar nerve transfer) may be needed to maintain muscle stimulation pending reinnervation from the proximal original nerve repair. 50 Alternatively, a functional distal nerve transfer (e.g., Oberlin transfer) can be employed to restore a specific motor deficit. 51 Specific well-documented examples of functional transfers form a whole topic on its own, and are beyond the scope of this article.

Primary Nerve Coaptation

The ideal nerve repair occurs after trimming the proximal and distal nerve ends to healthy fascicular structures. The topographic anatomy must be restored to decrease the risk of aberrant reinnervation. 52 This can be achieved by realigning the vasa nervorum, and by visually identifying known fascicular groups within the nerve. Whenever possible, a tension-free, precisely aligned, and atraumatic primary neurorrhaphy is favored. 53 54 Fig. 1 describes three main categories of primary direct nerve repair and their subcategories. Although there is theoretical advantage of precisely realigning each fascicle in interfascicular neurorrhaphy, the formation of excessive internal scarring has proven to adversely affect the clinical outcome of such repair. Today, the epineural repair is the mainstay of primary neurorrhaphy. 55

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Schematic presentation of proximal and distal nerve stumps: ( A ) grouped fascicular repair, suture coapting the corresponding a group of fascicles using the perineurium; ( B ) fascicular repair; and ( C ) standard epineural repair, stumps are aligned based on the anatomy of vessels.

Fibrin glue is sometimes used instead of standard microsurgical suturing. 56 57 The first commercially available fibrin sealant was introduced in the 1970s, and since then, its use in nerve repair has increased. 58 Potential benefits of fibrin glue utilization are: shorter procedure time, reduced recovery time, possible barrier to invading scar tissue, minimal trauma and scarring, and subsequently decreasing fibrosis and inflammation. 56 59 The main disadvantage of this technique is its inferior holding strength. 58 Currently, most available studies are from animal models and a well-controlled human study is lacking. Most of this literature demonstrates similar clinical outcomes for fibrin glue and microsutures in small diameter peripheral nerve coaptations. 56 59 60 61 Fibrin glue can also be used as an adjunct to microsuturing to reduce the total number of sutures, thus theoretically reducing the chance of suture-induced fibrosis. 62 63 That being said, there is a dichotomy in the evidence, while some works show the ease of use and noninferiority of fibrin glue to suturing, others show that it can lead to an inflammatory response and a high degree of scarring. This paucity in strong literature and human studies, warrants further studies to better investigate their comparative efficacy. 64

Even when optimal end-to-end microsurgical coaptation is done, scar tissue formation postoperatively can lead to excessive collagen deposition, fibrosis of the epineurium, and nerve compression that eventually impedes regeneration. 11 Pathophysiology of epineural scarring and compression are due to three main reasons: (1) vascular compromise, (2) tethering forces, and (3) direct nerve compression. 65 Few of the regenerating axons may escape the coaptation and create a neuroma. 45 To prevent this, nerve wraps were introduced to support repairs and minimize fibrosis and scarring. Wraps potentially offload tension from the repair site and distribute it across a larger length of the nerve. They can also act as a barrier and reduce axonal escape. 66 Currently, different nerve wraps are being utilized with autologous veins being the most common; mainly the great saphenous vein. 67 Several other types are namely: local and free flaps, autograft, allograft, and xenograft wraps. In a recent review, improvement in subjective and objective outcomes were drawn across all studies using vein autografts and despite a paucity of clinical and experimental data, many surgeons tend to use nerve wraps to protect the repair. 68

Nerve Defects

To overcome a nerve gap and to achieve a tension-free repair, interpositional nerve grafts or conduits can be used. The gold standard for such a repair is an autologous nerve graft. 69 Nerve grafts can be single, cable, trunk, and interfascicular, to provide a proper size match with the recipient nerve. 62 The ideal donor is a dispensable nerve, salvaged from spare part surgery, or from an easily accessible sensory nerve that does not result in a critical sensory deficit. Common autograft donors include the sural nerve, medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, with the sural nerve offering up to 40 cm of graft length from each leg. 70 When possible, an autograft 10 to 20% longer than the measured defect length should be harvested to ensure a tension-free repair and to avoid future shortening. 71

While nerve repair using autografts is a valuable surgical reconstructive option, it can be limited by tissue availability, donor site morbidity, or when a major size discrepancy exists between the donor and recipient. 72 73 Alternatives to nerve autografts include the use of autologous or synthetic conduits, nerve allograft, and xenograft.

Nerve conduits guide and facilitate axonal regeneration across segmental nerve defects, mimicking the natural structure of the nerve pathway. Natural material such as skeletal muscle tissue or vessels, 74 nondegradable materials such as silicone, and more recently biodegradable materials such as collagen, 75 have been widely investigated. Autologous vein grafts impart minimal donor site morbidity, and serve as a conduit that facilitates cellular migration between the cut nerve ends, bridging gaps up to 3 cm. 76 The advantages of synthetic nerve conduits include no donor site morbidity and the elimination of donor size discrepancy. However, they are limited to the defect size, with defects > 2 cm are better treated with autologous nerve grafting. 77 Processed allograft is a decellularized and sterile extracellular matrix obtained from human peripheral nerve tissue which requires no immunosuppressive therpay. 78 79 Clinical data support their use in noncritical nerve defects up to 5 cm.

Neuroma Formation

In situations where regenerating axons cannot successfully reenter the distal stump, the biologic response of the proximal stump leads to neuroma formation. This swelling of the terminal bulb of the proximal stump contains Schwann cells, fibroblasts, blood vessels, and most importantly, regenerating axons.

Severe neuropathic pain is normally not provoked if a main nerve fiber is cut sharply. Nonetheless, significant pain is almost always unavoidable after accidental damage to the terminal branch of the same type of cutaneous nerve. Some susceptible cutaneous sensory branches are: medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm, superficial radial nerve, sural nerve, and the long saphenous nerve. As the name implies, in complete neuromas (fully transected), the nerve trunk has been divided, whereas partial neuromas (neuroma in continuity) contain a portion of intact fibers.

The most commonly performed treatment of a neuroma is excision and anastomosis of the two ends. 80 Recent studies have compared various surgical options including: excision alone, traction neurectomy, excision and cap, excision and transposition, excision and repair with allograft or autograft, 81 and neurolysis and coverage, showing no superiority of one to another. 82 83 The current concept supports the shift to attempt to heal rather than hide the injured nerves. 84

A neuroma that has no distal nerve stump for a reconstruction of the resected nerve segment with a graft can be treated with a regenerative peripheral nerve interface or targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). The former involves wrapping the cut nerve end with a small free muscle graft, which allow nerve ingrowth and innervation. In TMR, the nerve stump is coapted to a small target motor nerve within a nearby muscle. In both modalities, the goal is to create a new functioning nerve–muscle interface for the transected nerve to innervate, thereby conferring it a new “job” to facilitate normal nerve healing and to prevent its dysregulated growth into a painful neuroma. TMR, in particular, has been shown in randomized controlled trials to decrease the incidence of postamputation neuroma pain and phantom limb pain compared with traditional traction neurectomy. 80

Strategies to Enhance Nerve Healing

There are several strategies to improve functional recovery after a nerve injury. As previously mentioned, a distal babysitting nerve transfer was initially proposed by Terzis and Tzafetta. 85 To decrease the risk of muscle atrophy and endplate loss in a high motor nerve injury, the procedure utilizes an end-to-side neurorrhaphy between a healthy donor located close to the motor target and the distal injured nerve to rapidly restore efferent stimuli to the denervated muscles, thereby preventing irreversible atrophy. This method has multiple applications, for instance, ipsilateral hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer is performed with cross-facial nerve grafting, anterior interosseous nerve to distal motor branch of the ulnar nerve transfer is done with high ulnar nerve laceration repair, and many other.

Emerging evidence demonstrates accelerated axon outgrowth across injury sites with brief electrical stimulation. 86 Electrical stimulation of the injured nerve can enhance the functional recovery even after delayed surgical repair. 87 A more recent study also supported the accelerating effect of immediate electrical stimulation in TMR with daily stimulation right after denervation. 88 These promising findings anticipate more rigorous clinical studies regarding their practicality and application. If proven to be clinically successful, intraoperative and postoperative brief electrical stimulation may become the standard of practice.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has demonstrated some benefit in different therapeutic applications such as pseudarthrosis, bone fractures, and various soft tissue conditions. 89 Although further studies are required to clearly demonstrate clinical efficacy, there are some promising reports on animal models indicating that LIPUS use accelerates peripheral nerve regeneration. 90

One of the most recent biologic agents administered to assist nerve regeneration is FK506, a Food and Drug Administration approved immunosuppressant. While FK506 has proven to enhance nerve regeneration, side effects of the systemically delivered FK506 has averted clinicians from its routine use. The current research is focused on developing innovative routes of local medication delivery such as using a fibrin gel matrix to significantly reduce the biodistribution, thereby reducing the chance of FK506 systemic toxicity. 91 Until this milestone is reached, its wide use in nerve repairs is unlikely.

Conclusion

During the last several decades, our knowledge of peripheral nerve pathophysiology has expanded drastically, and parallel to our refined microsurgical skills, we have discovered strategies to enhance its healing. We have become more consistent in achieving satisfactory reinnervation and functional outcomes in short nerve gap reconstructions, and recently have found new venues to repair larger defect. Future approaches should focus on new methods to improve the outcome in more challenging scenarios such as chronic injuries and delayed nerve repairs, for the aim of offering a better quality of life to a large portion of our trauma patients.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None declared.

References

• 1.Taylor C A, Braza D, Rice J B, Dillingham T. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87(05):381–385. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815e6370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2.Noble J, Munro C A, Prasad V S, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45(01):116–122. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Robinson L R. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(06):863–873. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200006)23:6<863::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4.He B, Zhu Z, Zhu Q. Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(06):661–672. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.130094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Thomas P, Holdorff B. Neuropathy due to physical agents. Peripheral Neuropathy. 1993;2:1948. [Google Scholar]
• 6.Waller A V. Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibres. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1850;(140):423–429. [Google Scholar]
• 7.Zochodne D W. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2008. Neurobiology of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. [Google Scholar]
• 8.Seddon H J, Medawar P B, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol. 1943;102(02):191–215. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74(04):491–516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Mackinnon S, Dellon A. New York: Thieme; 1988. Classification of nerve injuries as the basis for treatment; pp. 35–63. [Google Scholar]
• 11.Atkins S, Smith K G, Loescher A R. Scarring impedes regeneration at sites of peripheral nerve repair. Neuroreport. 2006;17(12):1245–1249. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000230519.39456.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 12.Chen P, Piao X, Bonaldo P. Role of macrophages in Wallerian degeneration and axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;130(05):605–618. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1482-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Carriel V, Garzón I, Alaminos M, Campos A. Eval‎uation of myelin sheath and collagen reorganization pattern in a model of peripheral nerve regeneration using an integrated histochemical approach. Histochem Cell Biol. 2011;136(06):709–717. doi: 10.1007/s00418-011-0874-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 14.Napoli I, Noon L A, Ribeiro S. A central role for the ERK-signaling pathway in controlling Schwann cell plasticity and peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron. 2012;73(04):729–742. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15.Fu S Y, Gordon T.Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation J Neurosci 199515(5 Pt 2):3886–3895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16.Höke A, Gordon T, Zochodne D W, Sulaiman O A. A decline in glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor expression‎ is associated with impaired regeneration after long-term Schwann cell denervation. Exp Neurol. 2002;173(01):77–85. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17.Chen Z-L, Yu W-M, Strickland S. Peripheral regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:209–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18.Rahmatullah M, Schroering A, Rothblum K, Stahl R C, Urban B, Carey D J. Synergistic regulation of Schwann cell proliferation by heregulin and forskolin. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(11):6245–6252. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.11.6245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 19.Murinson B B, Archer D R, Li Y, Griffin J W. Degeneration of myelinated efferent fibers prompts mitosis in Remak Schwann cells of uninjured C-fiber afferents. J Neurosci. 2005;25(05):1179–1187. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1372-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 20.Scheib J, Höke A. Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(12):668–676. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 21.Lu P, Wang Y, Graham L. Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell. 2012;150(06):1264–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Nguyen Q T, Sanes J R, Lichtman J W. Pre-existing pathways promote precise projection patterns. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5(09):861–867. doi: 10.1038/nn905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 23.Cattin A L, Burden J J, Van Emmenis L. Macrophage-induced blood vessels guide Schwann cell-mediated regeneration of peripheral nerves. Cell. 2015;162(05):1127–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 24.Parrinello S, Napoli I, Ribeiro S. EphB signaling directs peripheral nerve regeneration through Sox2-dependent Schwann cell sorting. Cell. 2010;143(01):145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 25.Lu J, Tapia J C, White O L, Lichtman J W. The interscutularis muscle connectome. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(02):e32. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]