듣기 자료 2007-2

[charliek]

LISTENING REVIEW (1/16) FEB, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY1. HIDDEN WORLD

We have a fascinating look tonight at the beginning of life.  Animal life.  It takes a puppy 63 days to develop (1. 잉태에서 출생까지: (전) ___________ (전) ______).  A baby elephant takes 22 months and (2. 출생 시 체중이 260파운드: ________s 260 pounds (전) ______). A program called "In The Womb: Animals" (3. 일요일에 첫 방영을 하다: __________s Sunday), December 10th on the National Geographic Channel.  With a preview, here's ABC’s Ned Potter.

(4. 첫 단계에서는: (전) the __________), we are all very much alike.  Sperm meets egg and (5. 배아: the ________) soon develops a heart, eyes, limbs.  And yes, that is a trunk.  This is the embryo of an Asian elephant.

You can see actual animal behavior (6. 자궁 내에서: (전) _______), which is really (7. 기초 단계: the _________ ______) to how those animals survive.

The National Geographic Channel used digital technology to show life in different animals' wombs.  It relied on (8. 최신 초음파 방식: the ______ ___________s), combining them with (9. 진흙 모형: _____ ______s) and computer animation.  Here's their (10. 연출: ________) of (11. 처음 발이 발생하는 시점의 돌고래: a dolphin ________ing the __________s of _____), which soon disappear and (12. 지느러미로 바뀌다: are ______ed (전) _____s).

Scientists say they really know very little about how those animals develop.  In some cases, they don't know enough to say what's normal or healthy.

This technology is gonna help us follow different species along and learn about what's normal.  How big should they be at four months?  At 12 months?

On the way, some revelations.  An unborn dolphin swims in the womb long before it swims in the sea.  A puppy starts to (13. 태어나기도 전에 낑낑대다: ______ ________ ______).  That will be its main way in life of keeping cool.

It's just beautiful.  It's, you know, it's a beautiful thing to behold.  And it's amazing.

The pictures are indeed striking.  But researchers also say that learning from them will help them, help the animals survive.  Ned Potter, ABC News, Washington.

LISTENING REVIEW (1/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY1. HIDDEN WORLD

We have a fascinating look tonight at the beginning of life.  Animal life.  It takes a puppy 63 days to develop (1. 임신에서출생까지: from conception to birth).  A baby elephant takes 22 months and (2. 출생 시 체중이 260파운드: weighs 260 pounds at birth). A program called "In The Womb: Animals" (3. 일요일에 첫 방영을 하다: premieres Sunday), December 10th on the National Geographic Channel.  With a preview, here's ABC’s Ned Potter.

(4. 첫 단계에서는: In the beginning), we are all very much alike.  Sperm meets egg and (5. 배아: the embryo) soon develops a heart, eyes, limbs.  And yes, that is a trunk.  This is the embryo of an Asian elephant.

You can see actual animal behavior (6. 자궁 내에서: in utero), which is really (6. 기초 단계: the building block) to how those animals survive.

The National Geographic Channel used digital technology to show life in different animals' wombs.  It relied on (7. 최신 초음파 방식: the newest ultrasounds), combining them with (8. 진흙 모형: clay models) and computer animation.  Here's their (9. 연출: rendition) of (10. 처음 발이 발생하는 시점의 돌고래: a dolphin developing the beginnings of feet), which soon disappear and (11. 지느러미로 바뀌다: are replaced by fins).

Scientists say they really know very little about how those animals develop.  In some cases, they don't know enough to say what's normal or healthy.

This technology is gonna help us follow different species along and learn about what's normal.  How big should they be at four months?  At 12 months?

On the way, some revelations.  An unborn dolphin swims in the womb long before it swims in the sea.  A puppy starts to (12. 태어나기도 전에 낑낑대다: pant before birth).  That will be its main way in life of keeping cool.

It's just beautiful.  It's, you know, it's a beautiful thing to behold.  And it's amazing.

The pictures are indeed striking.  But researchers also say that learning from them will help them, help the animals survive.  Ned Potter, ABC News, Washington.

LISTENING REVIEW (2/16) FEB, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY2: NEW DRUG MAY BE MORE DANGEROUS

Good evening.  The largest pharmaceutical company in the world has (1. 현실의 쓴 약을 삼키다: ________ed a ______­­__ ______ (전) ________) and (2. 의학계 전체: the _______ ________ _________) is disappointed.  For years now, the Pfizer Drug Company has been developing a new medicine that it was thought would help millions of heart patients.  Doctors were saying it might change (3. 심장병 치료 방식 전체: the ________ _____ ______ ________ is ______ed).  And then this weekend, word that (4. 약물 실험이 중단되었다: ______ ______s were ______ed), the drug will never (5. 시판되다: ______ (전) ________).  ABC’s John McKenzie explains why.

It is hard to exaggerate the excitement that surrounded this one drug.  Many doctors were predicting it would (6. 심장약의 혁신을 가져오다: ____________ _______ _________), save millions of lives and become one of (7. 역대 최대 매출을 기록한 약들: the ________-_____ing __________s of ­­____ ______).  They were wrong.

I had great hopes for this drug.  I thought we could make a difference with it.  I thought it was gonna work.  It didn't.

The experimental drug called torcetrapib was designed to (8. 인체에 좋은 콜레스테롤 수치를 높이다: ______ the body's ______ ____________), or HDL, by about 50%.  And Pfizer was betting that would reduce (9. 플라그 침착: the _________ of ________) in (10. 혈관: ______ ________s) that can cause heart attacks.  The drug had been in development for almost 15 years and was in the midst of its largest and (11. 최종 임상 실험 단계: ______ ________ ____), when (12. 독립적인 안전성 감시 단체: ___________ _______ _______s) saw an alarming effect they could not explain.  Among the 15,000 volunteers in the study, 82 people taking torcetrapib had died, compared to 51 people in the group not taking the drug.

(13. 더 높은 치사율: The _______ _________ _____) may (14. 환자의 절대 수치 면에서는 작아 보이다: _____ ______ (전) ________s of patients), but when we think about the tens of millions of people with heart disease who could potentially be treated by this drug, that turns into a large number of patients who could be at risk.

Over the weekend, (15. 안전 감시 위원회: the ______ ______) informed Pfizer and within hours the drug company announced it was abandoning the most important drug (16. (생산을 위해) 진행 중인: (전) its ________).  But why did it take $800 million?

Until you've given the drug to that large number of patients, you don't know the answer.  And unfortunately, there were no signals early on to tell us that we should be worried.

Pfizer was hoping to (17. 정부 승인을 득하다: ____ __________ _________) next year to begin selling the drug.  Tonight, many doctors are saying this time the country's drug testing process worked.  A major problem was detected before the medication (18. 일반에 시판되다: was _________ed (전) the ________).  John McKenzie, ABC News, New York.

And our medical editor Dr. Tim Johnson joins us now.  Tim, the group that's getting the experimental drug, 30 more deaths than the group that's not.  And on that difference we (19. 약을 폐기하다: _______ (전)  a _____) that was so promising?

Yes, for two reasons, as pointed out, when (20. 확대해서 분석하다: __________d (전) ______ ________s) taking the drug, the number of (21. 평균치를 초과하는 사망자 수: ________ ______s) would be very large.  Plus, we haven't proven the benefit side of the equation.  It has not been demonstrated this drug would actually save lives.  So you have to pay attention to the risks because you don't know the benefit.

But as we mentioned, doctors, a lot of them, you included, were very excited about this, that it would raise the good cholesterol on people.  Do we give up on drugs that might raise good cholesterol now?

Absolutely not.  There may be other drugs (22. 동일 계열의: (전) this _______) that will be safe, that won't produce, for example, high blood pressure, as this drug did.  Plus, the drug companies are looking at (23. 오랜 동안 중단된: an ____ _________), niacin, B vitamin, that is very effective in raising cholesterol, has serious side effects, annoying side effects, (24. 안면 홍조: ________ ______ing), they're gonna come out with some new versions that will raise the HDL without the side effects.

And one thing we should mention, millions of people take statin drugs that lower bad cholesterol, should they think about stopping that?

Absolutely not.  Two different drugs, two different targets.  The statin drugs have been around for 20 years, we know that they are very effective and very safe in the vast majority people take them.  They should keep taking them.  And what we hope for, eventually, is a combination of drugs that would both lower the LDL, like the statins, and raise the HDL.  That would be a potent combination.

All right.  Disappointment for now, but keep taking the statins.  Dr. Tim Johnson, thanks.

LISTENING REVIEW (2/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY2: NEW DRUG MAY BE MORE DANGEROUS

Good evening.  The largest pharmaceutical company in the world has (2. 현실의 쓴 약을 삼키다: swallowed a bitter dose of reality) and (2. 의학계 전체: the entire medical community) is disappointed.  For years now, the Pfizer Drug Company has been developing a new medicine that it was thought would help millions of heart patients.  Doctors were saying it might change (3. 심장병 치료 방식 전체: the entire way heart disease is treated).  And then this weekend, word that (4. 약물 실험이 중단되었다: drug trials were halted), the drug will never (5. 시판되다: come to market).  ABC’s John McKenzie explains why.

It is hard to exaggerate the excitement that surrounded this one drug.  Many doctors were predicting it would (6. 심장약의혁신을 가져오다: revolutionize heart medicine), save millions of lives and become one of (7. 역대 최대 매출을 기록한 약들: the biggest-selling medications of all time).  They were wrong.

I had great hopes for this drug.  I thought we could make a difference with it.  I thought it was gonna work.  It didn't.

The experimental drug called torcetrapib was designed to (7. 인체에 좋은 콜레스테롤 수치를 높이다: raise the body's good cholesterol), or HDL, by about 50%.  And Pfizer was betting that would reduce (8. 플라그 침착: the buildup of plaque) in (9. 혈관: blood vessels) that can cause heart attacks.  The drug had been in development for almost 15 years and was in the midst of its largest and (10. 최종 임상 실험 단계: final clinical test), when (11. 독립적인 안전성 감시 단체: independent safety monitors) saw an alarming effect they could not explain.  Among the 15,000 volunteers in the study, 82 people taking torcetrapib had died, compared to 51 people in the group not taking the drug.

(12. 더 높은 치사율: The higher mortality rate) may (13. 환자의 절대 수치 면에서는 작아 보이다: look small in numbers of patients), but when we think about the tens of millions of people with heart disease who could potentially be treated by this drug, that turns into a large number of patients who could be at risk.

Over the weekend, (14. 안전 감시 위원회: the safety panel) informed Pfizer and within hours the drug company announced it was abandoning the most important drug (15. (생산을 위해) 진행 중인: in its pipeline).  But why did it take $800 million?

Until you've given the drug to that large number of patients, you don't know the answer.  And unfortunately, there were no signals early on to tell us that we should be worried.

Pfizer was hoping to (16. 정부 승인을 득하다: get government approval) next year to begin selling the drug.  Tonight, many doctors are saying this time the country's drug testing process worked.  A major problem was detected before the medication (17. 일반에 시판되다: was released to the public).  John McKenzie, ABC News, New York.

And our medical editor Dr. Tim Johnson joins us now.  Tim, the group that's getting the experimental drug, 30 more deaths than the group that's not.  And on that difference we (18. 약을 폐기하다: write off a drug) that was so promising?

Yes, for two reasons, as pointed out, when (19. 확대해서 분석하다: extrapolated to large numbers) taking the drug, the number of (20. 평균치를 초과하는 사망자 수: excess deaths) would be very large.  Plus, we haven't proven the benefit side of the equation.  It has not been demonstrated this drug would actually save lives.  So you have to pay attention to the risks because you don't know the benefit.

But as we mentioned, doctors, a lot of them, you included, were very excited about this, that it would raise the good cholesterol on people.  Do we give up on drugs that might raise good cholesterol now?

Absolutely not.  There may be other drugs (21. 동일 계열의: in this class) that will be safe, that won't produce, for example, high blood pressure, as this drug did.  Plus, the drug companies are looking at (22. 오랜 동안 중단된: an old standby), niacin, B vitamin, that is very effective in raising cholesterol, has serious side effects, annoying side effects, (23. 안면 홍조: facial flushing), they're gonna come out with some new versions that will raise the HDL without the side effects.

And one thing we should mention, millions of people take statin drugs that lower bad cholesterol, should they think about stopping that?

Absolutely not.  Two different drugs, two different targets.  The statin drugs have been around for 20 years, we know that they are very effective and very safe in the vast majority people take them.  They should keep taking them.  And what we hope for, eventually, is a combination of drugs that would both lower the LDL, like the statins, and raise the HDL.  That would be a potent combination.

All right.  Disappointment for now, but keep taking the statins.  Dr. Tim Johnson, thanks.

LISTENING REVIEW (3/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY3: CASES ON RACE IN SCHOOLS

In Washington, the Supreme Court (1. 뜨거운 논쟁에 돌입하다: jumped into the emotional debate) about race in (2. 공립학교: public schools).  The issue?   (3. 자발적 (인종) 통합 학교 프로그램들: Voluntary school integration programs) that use race in (4. 아이들을 학교에 배정하다: assigning children to schools) in order to (5. 인종 구성 비율 균형을 맞추다: achieve racial balance).  Are such programs constitutional?  ABC's (6. 법률 문제 담당 기자: legal correspondent), Jan Crawford Greenburg, was at the court today and joins us from there.  Jan?

People started camping out here (7. 추운 날씨에: in the cold) yesterday afternoon to (8. 좋은 자리를 차지하다: get a prized seat) inside.  And Charlie, (9. 기다린 가치가 있었다: it was worth the wait).  At issue, the most important cases about race (10. 심리하다: to reach the court) in years, and the two-hour argument was electrifying.

(11. 버스에 나눠 탄 시위대: Busloads of protesters) came to the Supreme Court in support of two school districts that were assigning students to schools based, in some cases, on the color of their skin to achieve racial balance.  The few opponents outside the Supreme Court say that's (12. 명백한 인종 차별: nothing more than racism).

What it does is that it (13. 인종 차별에 해당되다: mounts to race discrimination) and race discrimination is wrong.

Inside the court, the mood was (14. 상당히 긴장된: testy and tense).  (15. 대법관들: The justices) (16. 주요 쟁점을 주로 논의하다: grappled with a key question) - can officials (17. 아이들이 거주지 학교에 등교하는 것을 못하게 하다: turn children away from their neighborhood schools) because they're the wrong color?  (18. 판결에 결정적인 영향을 미칠 판사: Swing Justice) Anthony Kennedy, whose vote could determine the outcome of the case, called the school plans “troubling.”  He suggested schools could find better ways to integrate.

You're characterizing each student (19. 인종 색을 이유로: by reason of the color of his or her skin).  And it seems to me that that should only be, if ever allowed, allowed as a last resort.

The issue deeply (20. 대법관들의 의견을 양분시키다: divided the justices).  (21. 진보적 입장의 대법관: Liberal Justice) Stephen Breyer worried that without the school district's actions, the nation's schools could (22. 퇴보하다: go back in history).

There's a terrible problem in the country.  There are lots and lots of school districts that are becoming more and more segregated.

Much of the argument focused on the historic case of "Brown versus Board of Education," which outlawed school segregation.  Chief Justice John Roberts suggested any consideration of race, even to keep schools integrated, is unconstitutional.

The purpose of (23. 인종분리 금지 조항: the equal protection clause) is to ensure that people are treated as individuals rather than based on the color of their skin.

A majority of the justices today seemed pretty skeptical of these plans to keep students integrated based on their race.  So that suggests that this new Roberts court may be poised to (24. 좀 더 보수적인 방향으로 나가다: go in a more conservative direction).  Charlie?

LISTENING REVIEW (4/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY4: GROWING UP FAST

In this hectic season, we're gonna take "a closer look" tonight at being very busy and being a kid.  Study after study shows that children's free time is dwindling, (1. 꽉 찬 계획표로 바뀌다: replaced by packed schedules).  For as many as 6% of children, that means 20-plus hours a week of lessons, clubs and sports (2. 그 모든 숙제 외에도: on top of all of the homework).  All of this strikes a lot of people, pediatricians included, as overload and has them asking how much is too much?  But as ABC's Lisa Stark reports, there is no simple answer.

By all accounts, Annalise Corriveau and her brother, Nicko, are busy kids.

Good shot, Nicko.

They (3. 여러 가지를 거의 동시에 하다: juggle) soccer, hockey, music lessons, (4. 리허설 연습하다: play rehearsals). Sometimes it's 9:00 at night before Nicko gets dinner and Annalise starts homework.

This looks crazy.

Totally crazy.

A study by the American Academy of Pediatrics warns that kids these days are (5. 스케줄이 과도한: overscheduled) and need (6. 좀 더 많은 쉴 시간: more down time).  More time for free play.

Do you want to raise a child who is so used to (7. 여러 가지 일을 동시에 하다: multitasking) every moment of their day that they don't have the time to relax?

But a different study argues kids are not overscheduled, that those who take part in (8. 조직 활동: organized activities) (9. 학업 성적이 더 좋다: do better academically) and are generally happier.

We find no evidence to suggest in our data that just being involved in a lot of activities is necessarily stressful or difficult for young people to manage.

This study found kids, on average, spend about five hours a week in organized activities, and that even 20 hours a week may not be too much for some children.

If I didn't have sports, I'd probably be sitting home watching TV, like, every day.

Both studies agree on one thing, every child is different.  Some might do better with a busy schedule, others won't.

It depends on your child.  You have to (9. 자기 아이에게서 (힘들어하는지) 조짐을 찾다: look for cues in your own child).  You have to look for cues of too much stress.

Take Nelson and Camden Penn.  They have just one activity a week, a chess club.  That's enough for them.

Having to go everywhere, gulping down food, go to someplace else, run all around town, I don't like stress.

When I've asked them if they wanted to be involved in a sport or different activities, they've declined.

Researchers who disagree on how many activities are too many do agree on this, the key is, know your child.  Lisa Stark, ABC News, Bethesda, Maryland.

LISTENING REVIEW (5/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY5: NOT TOO OLD TO LEARN

Finally tonight, a story about a man in Kenya, who has simply amazed us with his determination and his optimism.  He is 86 years old.  And (1. 그는 3학년이다: he's in the third grade), as best we can tell, (2. 전세계 최고령 초등학생: the oldest elementary school student in the world).  His life in a slum has been filled with hardship.  But now, it is filled with (3. 배움의 기쁨: the joy of learning).  ABC’s Kate Snow reports tonight, from Kenya.

Last night's rain made (4. 길이 진흙으로 질퍽질퍽한: the path thick with sticky, red mud).  But Kimani Nganga Maruge barely seems to notice.  He is determined to (5. 정각에 학교에 도착하다: get to school on time).

Good morning, madam.

The journey started when he was 84.  That's when the Kenyan government (6. 초등학교 무상 교육 관련법을 통과시키다:  passed a law providing free elementary education).  Kimani showed up at the principal's office.

We thought he was joking.  And we told him we don't teach old people.

They sent him home four times.  But on the first day of the new semester, there he was again.

We found him in school (7. 반바지를 입은: in shorts), and a pullover and a shirt of the same color of the uniform.

Ready for school?

Ready for school.

Kimani never (8. 초등학교에 다니다: went to grade school) back when he was a kid in the 1920s.  In fact, he had never even (9. 연필을 잡다: held a pencil) until he came to this school.  Now he says he wants to get his PhD.

Kimani says he's studying to make life better for his family.  He and his 15-year-old grandson, Stephen, live in a single room, share a twin bed and go to the same school.

Most people would think 84 years old is too old to go to school.

No.

"There are those who don't like to work," he says.  "But watch me.  I do the hard work.”  (10. 그 적극성: That gumption) has made him a hero in the neighborhood and beyond.

You are very famous?

Yes.

Inspiring thousands of Kenyans to attend school.

Seeing that old person, why not us come to school?  Why not village boys and girls come to school?

Come to school with Kimani, the student teaching everyone a lesson.  Kate Snow, ABC News, El Doret, Kenya.

And if that sounds like a story right out of Hollywood, it will be soon.  A movie of Kimani's life is (11. 작업이 진행 중: in the works).

LISTENING REVIEW (6/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY6: FIGHTING AUTISM

On Capitol Hill, tonight, there is a breakthrough on (1. 자폐증 관련 주요 입법: major legislation dealing with autism).  Legislation that (2. 1년 반 이상 (입법 과정에) 진척이 없었던: had been held up for more than a year and a half).  As it prepares to (3. 휴회하다: adjourn), Congress finally passed (4. 9억4천5백만 달러 예산의 입법안: a $945 million measure) for research on the disorder.

We usually think of children when we think of autism.  But it's estimated that up to a million American adults are also living with it.  Here's ABC’s John Donvan.

She's 22years old and has autism.  And (5. 언어 장애가 있다: struggles to speak).  And (6. 혼자서 화장을 하다: apply her own makeup).

Let's go say hello to everybody, okay?

And (7. 혼자서 건물 여기 저기를 찾아다니다: navigate her way around a building) without help.

The star of this evening, Jamie Hoppe.

But there is one thing that Jamie Hoppe does know how to do.  She can (8. 감동시키다: bring tears to the eyes) with what she does up there for an audience that really understands.  And how lucky she is that she didn't fall through the cracks the day she turned 21.  (9. 홀로서기: Aging out), it is called.  (10. 엄연한 사실: The stark fact) that whatever special programs school districts offer autistic youngsters, programs that (11. 단순 기술을 자폐증 청소년들에게 교육하다: train them in the simplest skills), and continuously, because, otherwise, autistic kids (12. 퇴보하다: backslide).

But all these programs, they (13. 갑자기 중단되다: come to a sudden halt), when a kid turns into an adult.  At age 21, it's over. You've aged out of the system.

Then at 21, we say, “Okay, thanks,” as opposed to saying, “Well, you know what?  Now, let's help you get a job.  And let's help you have a life, then you feel valued and you feel productive.”

Have a good weekend.

Thank you, Jamie.  You, too.

So, where are all these kids, after they're educated so beautifully, where are they going to go?

Jen Hoppe is Jamie's mother.

This is actually the 1,700 square feet of living space that the Wyckoff YMCA gave to the Quest Autism Foundation.  Nobody asked what the plan is.  It's got, the amount of (14. 자폐증 진단 받은 사람들: people diagnosed with autism) has just overwhelmed everyone.  Nobody, there is no plan.  We have to make a plan.  This is a start.

That is the challenge.  And so, when Jamie sang, it was (15. 기금 조성 모임: a fundraiser).  She was (16. 제 역할을 하다: doing her part).  But here's the thing. Let her lessons stop one day, and she'll likely lose even her ability to sing after all that work.  That's what autism is.  And not just in childhood.  John Donvan, ABC News, New York.

LISTENING REVIEW (7/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY7: THE OUTBREAK SPREADS

Good evening.  (1. E. coli균으로 인한 최근의 식중독 발병: The most recent outbreak of E. coli food poisoning) is spreading.  (2. 원래 동북부 지역에 제한되어 있던: Originally confined in the Northeast), it has now spread to other states across the country. So far, there are at least 293 (3. 확인된 혹은 의심되는 사례들: confirmed or suspected cases) in six states, all thought to be people who ate at Taco Bell restaurants.

It is a reminder that the nation's food supply (4. 자유롭게 유통되다: knows no boundaries).  For (5. 작은 생파: the raw scallions) (6. 문제였던 것으로 의심되는: suspected to be at fault) were grown in California, but (7. 전국적으로 유통되다: shipped across the country).  ABC’s Nancy Cordes joins us with the latest.  Nancy?

Charlie, health officials initially thought this was just (8. 소규모의 국지적 발병 사례: a small, local outbreak) in New York and New Jersey.  But now, the cases are starting (9. 전국으로 확산되다: to spread across the country).  And while Taco Bell has (10. 파 전량을 폐기하다: thrown out all its green onions), the FDA does not believe this outbreak is over.

Taco Bell uses green onions in everything, from quesadillas to burritos.  But until the FDA confirm‎s the green onions are (11. 주범: the culprit), they are testing the chain's lettuce, tomatoes and other (12. 농산물: produce), too.

This is a devastating illness when someone gets it.  It can (13. 평생 병약하게 할 수 있는: be debilitating for life).  It can be deadly.  And so, we take every case very, very seriously.

(13. 전국의 조사 당국: Investigators on both coasts) are now trying (14. 병원균 오염 원인을 정확히 파악하다: to pinpoint the source of contamination).  Was it the Southern California fields of Boskovich Farms, where Taco Bell's green onions are grown?  Or the Ready Pac produce plant in Central New Jersey, (16. 세척 및 포장이 이루어지는 곳: where they are washed and packed)?  Or even (17. 인근 창고: the nearby warehouse) of McLean Foodservice, the green onions' last stop before they are delivered to Taco Bells in eight states.  Food safety expert Steven Shaw says, in these days of mass production and distribution, (18. 소규모 발병: a small outbreak) can (19. 전국으로 급속히 확산되다: go nationwide in a hurry).

The fast food places tend to have to buy (20. 대량으로: in huge quantities).  And as a result, if there's a problem with any of the food, it's probably gonna show up (21. 반복적으로: over and over again) in many different restaurants.

The government is not yet advising consumers to (22. 타코 벨을 피해가다: steer clear of) Taco Bell.  But many say they already are.

I'm gonna wait a good month, month and a half until, you know, it dies down.  I need, I need to know when it feels safe.

This outbreak comes just two and a half months after California spinach, (23. E. coli 박테리아에 오염된: tainted with E. coli), killed three and (24. 식중독 환자를 유발하다: sickened) 200 others.  The FDA says (25. 잇따른 발병 사례: the back-to-back outbreaks) are likely a coincidence, and that, overall, the nation's (26. 식품 유통: food supply) is safe.

One of the things you have to realize is that, as a nation, we eat millions and billions of pounds of (27. 야채 및 채소류: fresh produce) every day.  And in fact, we should be eating more fresh produce as part of (28. 건강식: a healthy diet).

Among all the cases, this current outbreak has resulted in seven (29. 확인된 사례: confirmed cases) of (30. 신장 기능 이상: kidney failure).  But as of yet, (31. 접수된 사망 건 수는 없음: no reported deaths), Charlie.  However, there is (32. 아주 높은 입원률: a very high rate of hospitalizations) associated with this outbreak.

ABC's Nancy Cordes, reporting tonight.

LISTENING REVIEW (8/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY8: CASE CLOSED

We're gonna turn, next, to a Capitol Hill scandal that outraged America, rattled the Republican Party, and (1. 영향력 있는 연방 의원을 사임케하다: forced an influential congressman to resign).  More than two months after ABC News reported Congressman Mark Foley sent inappropriate Internet messages to (2. 미성년 의회 急使들: underage congressional pages), the House investigation has concluded.  We turn to our senior (3. 정치 전문기자: political correspondent), Jake Tapper.

After nine weeks of investigating the Mark Foley (4. 급사 추문: page scandal), the (5. 민주 공화 양당 의원들로 구성된: bipartisan) House Ethics Committee decided today that no current congressmen or staffers (6. 하원 공직자 윤리 규정을 위반하다: violated  the House Code of Official Conduct).

I think we found the truth.  I think we answered the questions that we had to answer.

The committee, which (7. 50차례 이상의 인터뷰와 공술서 작성을 실시하다: conducted more than 50 interviews and depositions), did find “a pattern of conduct was exhibited among many individuals to remain willfully ignorant” of Congressman Mark Foley's behavior with pages.  But it “calls for no one to (8. 징계되다: be disciplined).”

The Ethics Committee blew it.  There was ample evidence that a number of members of Congress and congressional staff knew about Foley's inappropriate conduct towards pages.

The report faults former Majority Leader John Boehner and Congressman Tom Reynolds for not showing any “curiosity regarding why a young former page would have been made uncomfortable by e-mails from Representative Foley”.  And it (9. 여러 증인의 증언을 제시하다: provides testimony from many witnesses), (10. 진술을 반박하다: challenging accounts given) by both (11. 퇴임하는: outgoing) Speaker Dennis Hastert and his (12. 비서실장: chief of staff), Scott Palmer, that they did not know anything about Foley's behavior until ABC News broke the scandal in late September.

One House rule requires every congressman and staffer to, quote, “conduct himself, at all times, in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House.”  Critics of today's report say if members of the Ethics Committee cannot see any evidence that that rule was violated, it shows they cannot (13. 자신의 동료들을 효과적으로 판단하다: effectively judge their peers).  Jake Tapper, ABC News, Washington.

LISTENING REVIEW (9/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY9: MONEY SCAMS

We're gonna turn next to an e-mail you've probably received, (1. 富를 약속하는: promising riches) if only you provide your bank account number and (2. 처리 수수료를 내다: pay a processing fee).  If you have gotten such a message, it probably looked (3. 피싱 사기: fishy).  It is fishy.

But messages like those have (4. 7억 5천만 달러에 달하는 미국인의 돈을 사취하다: conned Americans out of nearly $750 million) a year.  Our chief investigative correspondent, Brian Ross, (5. 이메일을 역추적해 나이지리아로 가다: followed the e-mail trail to Nigeria).

It is one of (6. 세계 최대 규모의 사기꾼 집단: the world's great collections of con artists), (7. 은밀히 뒷골목에 장소를 정해놓고 활동하는: operating out of hidden, backstreet locations) in Lagos, Nigeria.  These are some of the thousands of young men who, armed with no more than a computer and (8. 인터넷 연결: an Internet connection), have been (9. 순진한 미국인들을 속이다: cheating gullible Americans) out of billions of dollars with their elaborate (10. 이메일 사기: e-mail scams).

They're geniuses at understanding human nature.

There are (11. 수백 가지의 사기 방법: hundreds of variations on the scams).  But most promise the lucky recipients (12. 수백만 달러의 횡재: a windfall of millions).  You've (13. 복권에 당첨되다: won the lottery).  There's an inheritance from an unknown relative.  Just (14. 선불로 약간의 수수료를 지불하다: pay a small fee in advance).

That's (15. 함정: the catch).  That's the initial catch.  And once they have you, people almost become addicted to the scheme.

Victims include a former congressman, a New Hampshire accountant, a university law professor, a Florida lawyer and California heart surgeon, Dr. Tim Sloan, who lost $350,000, (16. 평생 모은 돈: his life savings).

I'm mad at myself for falling into the trap.

Now, a new (17. 금융 사기 전담반: financial crimes squad) in Nigeria is starting to (18. 이메일 사기를 단속하다: crackdown on the e-mail scams).  (19. 온라인 사기꾼들: The scammers online) here (20. 문 쪽으로 달아나다: went running for the doors) when the officers showed up.  We found one of them in the middle of trying to cheat an Alabama woman.  She had just sent her photo and bank account number to Nigeria.

I was stupid to send back my information, which I shouldn't have.

She was lucky the raid stopped the scam before she lost any money.  But the crackdown threatens what has become (21. 일로 번창하는 수십억 달러 사업: a thriving, multibillion-dollar business) so widely accepted here, there is even a hit music video celebrating the scammers as the masters, mocking the white American victims as the magus, the big fools.

There seems to be no shortage in Nigeria of (22. 컴퓨터에 능한 젊은 층: computer-savvy young men) (23. 쉽게 돈을 벌려고 나서다: out to make an easy buck).  Just as there seems to be no shortage in this country of gullible victims out to make an easy buck.  The magus and the masters, Charlie, are dancing to the same tune.

LISTENING REVIEW (10/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY10: AMERICA SHOULD TAKE THE LEAD

(1. 퇴임하는 유엔 사무총장: The outgoing United Nations Secretary-General) Kofi Annan (2. 이별의 총격을 가하다: took a parting shot at) President Bush today.  (3. 퇴임을 앞둔 마지막 연설에서: In his final speech before stepping down), Annan said the US must not sacrifice its principles (4. 테러 전의 미명하에: in the name of fighting terrorism).

This country has historically been (5. 세계 인권 운동의 선두에서: in the vanguard of global human rights movement).  When it appears to abandon its own ideals and objectives, its friends abroad are naturally troubled and confused.

Annan, who is stepping down after 10 years as Secretary-General, said the world needs the US in the leadership role it has played in the past and can play again.

STORY10-1: PROTEST AGAINST PRESIDENT

In Iran today (1. 특이한 광경: an extraordinary sight).  (2. 반대 시위: A demonstration against) President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  Dozens of students shouted “death to the dictator” as he spoke at a university.  They burned photographs of the president.  His supporters shouted down the demonstrators.  There were no reports of arrests.

LISTENING REVIEW (11/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY11: SAVING THE CHILDREN

We are gonna take “a closer look” tonight at the plight of vulnerable, exploited, very young children (1. 아동 노동의 세계라는 덫에 걸린: trapped in the world of child labor).  Almost 250 million children have (2. 노동에 투입되다: been put to work) around the world, many (3. 아주 위험한 환경에서: in hazardous conditions).  Hundreds of these children (4. 고된 하루 하루를 보내다: spend one grueling day after another) at a mine in the African nation of Congo, (5. 철광석을 채굴하며: digging for scraps of metal) that could end up in something you buy.  Tonight, ABC's David Wright reports on a few who've made it out, and the many, many more who haven't.

In this corner of Congo, childhood is (6. 먼 나라 이야기: a foreign concept).  These boys are (7. 수입원으로서의 가장: the breadwinners for their families).  15-year-old Cedric and the twins, Kaba and Decu, just 8.  Every morning, the schoolchildren would (8. 같은 방향으로 향하다: head one way).  But not them.  (9. 그들이 아침에 향하는 곳: Their morning commute) was a two-hour hike to the Ruashi mines.  Heavy work, especially for Decu.  He told the BBC reporter he'd like to go to school (10. TV에 나오는 아이들이 하듯이: as they do on TV).  His father (11. 학비를 마련할 재간이 없다: can't afford the school fees).  These boys are not alone.

In this one mine alone, there are close to 800 children (12. 중노동을 하는: hard at work).  They can be as young as 5 or 6-years-old.  There are no safety standards.  No one has (13. 보호 장구: protective equipment).  The children are working (14. 맨손 맨발로: with bare hands and bare feet).  And while there is big money being made in all of this, it's not going to those here who are doing the digging.

The minerals found in this mine might (15. 최종적으로 가정에서 사용되다: wind up in your home).  Copper and cobalt used in fridges, TVs, and (16. 휴대폰 전지: batteries for mobile phones).  “If there's less than one kilo,” he says, “we won't get paid a lot.”  Cedric's day ends at (17. 더러운 호수: the toxic lake), washing cobalt with his bare feet (18. 그 더러운 물에서: in the filthy water).  The mine's new owners, Metorex Limited, would not (19. 카메라 인터뷰하다: talk on camera).  But company officials told the BBC they do not (20. 아동 노동을 용인하다: condone child labor).  The day's wages?  A handful of food and a little cash.  Between them, not enough for an evening meal.  Shortly after the BBC profiled these children, (21. 한 벨기에 자선 단체가 개입하다: a Belgian charity stepped in).  They offered 250 child miners the opportunity to go to school.  Cedric hopes to be a mechanic and the twins wanna be pastors.  Now, they'll have that chance.  But for thousands of others, it's still hard labor and not much reward.  Six days a week.  For them, childhood is still just something you see on TV.  David Wright, ABC News, London.

And there are ways you can help the children who work in these mines.  We posted the information on our website, Abcnews.com.

LISTENING REVIEW (12/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY12: UNDECK THE HALLS

And finally tonight, with Christmas just two weeks away, one sure sign of the season is (1. 본격화하다: in full swing), the battles over holiday decorations.  The so-called Christmas wars.  Whose symbols can go where?  Who's included?  Who's offended?  (2. 아주 복잡한 상황으로 바뀌다: It's turned into a very messy business).  ABC’s Neal Karlinsky has the latest example from Seattle.

At Sea-Tac airport, it is the season for (3. 분노와 감정의 상처: outrage and hurt feelings), but apparently not for Christmas trees.

I think it's very unfortunate.  Why lose the Christmas spirit?

(4. 시애틀 라디오 토크 쇼 프로: Seattle talk radio) is (5. 놀라운 소식을 듣다: getting an earful).

This is political correctness (6. 삼천포로 빠지다: running amok).

It all began when a local rabbi threatened a lawsuit if the airport didn't put up (7. (유태교의 제식에 쓰이는) 아홉 가지 촛대: a menorah) to go along with their 14 trees.  Airport officials decided against that.  Instead, they pulled all of the trees, packaged them up and hid them out of sight.

Because we did not have time to consider what other kind of religions might also (8. 상징물을 정당화하다: warrant symbols) as part of the holiday decorations, we (9. 크리스마스트리를 철거하다: took the trees down).

The big wreath on the wall and a few snowflakes remained.  But that's about it.  All that's left of the big Christmas tree display here is (10. 플로어에 휑하니 빈 자리: a big empty spot on the floor).

The rabbi, who (11. 이번 문제를 제기하다: brought the issue), has been getting hate mail.

I'm shocked, appalled, extremely upset at the mere fact that they would remove the Christmas trees for the holiday.  This is not at all the intent.

But (12. 크리스마스 전쟁은 여러 전선에서 치러지고 있다: the Christmas wars are being fought this year on many fronts).  From a Jesus-free nativity scene in West Virginia to a festival in Chicago where sponsors decided to ban advertisements for ("The Nativity Story.”  Many Christians are angry.

What's next?  you know?  We'd have to get rid of the tooth fairy?  This really has gone too far.

At Sea-Tac, some airlines are pushing back.  They've begun (13. 독자적으로 자그마한 트리들을 설치하다: putting up their own small trees) at ticket counters.  (14. 크리스마스까지 2주일이 남은 상태에서: With two weeks to go until Christmas), overwhelmed airport officials are debating their next move.  And one longtime airport Santa says he feels like (15. 자신이 공격의 대상이 되다: he has a bull’s-eye on his back).

Are you worried they're gonna come after you next?

I told a few people they might kick me out.

Kick out Santa?  Neal Karlinsky, ABC News, Seattle.

LISTENING REVIEW (13/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY13: SILENT ALARM

We turn, next, to (1. 흔한 출산 기형: a common birth defect).  Every year, an estimated 12,000 babies in the United States are born with (2. 청각 장애: hearing loss).  Testing is routine and most parents learn soon if their baby is (3. 청각 장애가 있는: hard of hearing).  They also learn that the tools to help their children, (4. 보청기: hearing aids), are almost certainly (5. 보험 적용이 되지 않는: not covered by insurance).  Here's ABC’s Nancy Cordes.

Grace Gleba can do all the things that other second graders do.  She likes to cheer.  She can sing in (6. 크리스마스 축제: a Christmas pageant).  Until she (7. 보청기를 벗다: takes out her hearing aids).

When I talk this softly, what do you hear?

I can't hear her.

That's okay.  Yeah, it's your first birthday.

Grace was born with (8. 심각한 청각 장애: severe hearing loss).  Her parents (9. 또 다시 놀라다: got a second shock) when they learned their insurance company would not (10. 작은 보청기에 대해 보험 적용을 하다: pay for her tiny hearing aids).  They've been (11. 입법화를 위해 투쟁 중: fighting for legislation) in New Jersey ever since.

It's (12. 믿기지 않는: mind-boggling) that they're not covered when you think of - that they cover other (13. 보철물: prosthetics), they cover wheelchairs.  These are like wheelchairs for her ears.

At an average cost of $1800 per ear, hearing aids aren’t cheap, especially for children whose ears are growing and changing all the time.

What did she say?

But Medicare does not cover them for children or adults.  And many (14. 민간 보험사들: private insurers) (15. 정부 기관의 선례를 따르다: follow the government agency's lead).

Most insurance companies see hearing aids as being a device that's more for comfort and convenience rather than viewing it as more of (16. 의료 기구: a medical device) to help a medical condition.

A condition that doctors say (17. 조기에 해결되지 않으면: if not addressed early) can (18. 영원히 청각 장애를 유발하다: permanently impair listening), speaking and learning skills.  Right now, only eight states require insurance companies to cover children's hearing aids.

It isn't a question of whether or not the benefit is a worthy benefit.  It's a question of what employers feel that they can afford to provide.

The Glebas' fight for a law in New Jersey is (19. 7년째로 접어들고 있다: moving into its seventh year).  If it ever (20. 입법처리되다: passes), it will be called “Grace's law.”

Very good.  You won.  See that?

Nancy Cordes, ABC News, Washington, New Jersey.

LISTENING REVIEW (14/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY14: DANCE OF THE CELLS

Finally  tonight, (1. 생물학에서 따분함을 몰아내기: keeping boredom out of biology).  A Harvard biology professor recently was looking for a way to (2. 자신의 강좌의 흥취를 돋우다: spice up his course) and (3. 생물학 전공 선택 학생 수를 늘리다: attract more biology majors).  His idea?  Get one of America's great animators to make a film showing what's going on in everyone's bodies right now.  So what are Harvard students seeing these days?  Our Robert Krulwich thought you'd be as fascinated as we were.

This is what a human cell looks like in a textbook.  (4. 따분하고 정적인: Dull and still).  But your cells are alive.  They're (5. 계속 움직이는: in constant motion).  “They should be a movie,” says Harvard biology professor Robert Lu.

I'm (6. 엄청난 영화광: a big movie buff).

And so professor Lu made a movie, (7. 일러스트레이션이지만 과학적으로 사실에 입각한 광경: an illustrated but scientifically accurate view) of what goes on.  For example, let's plunge down here and watch what happens when the cell wants to move something from deep inside the cell to the outside.  First, proteins that are just (8. 浮游해서 돌아다니는: floating around) and they suddenly (9. 결합하다: come together) to build a road.

But as you can see, they grow from (10. 작은 하위 단위: little subunits), little smaller proteins coming together.

And this happens all the time?

It's happening all the time.

So the bones grow where they're needed. /Yes.

Like, just like this? /Yes.  Absolutely.

And this kind of thing? /And now, this is (11. 좀 더 복잡한 섬유질: a more complex fiber), called the microtubule.

But it's coming into being. /Exactly.  Here it is falling apart.

And it does this as required? Yes.

So we're gonna create highways or bones of - oh, wait, what is this? /Yes.  Now this, this is a protein called the motor protein.

This isn't real, right? / It is real.  That's walking along one of those (12. 미세소관: 세포 원형질의 극소관: microtubules).

This clumpy thing? /Yes.  There it is again.

What, it's dragging that huge sack? /So it's dragging this membrane's sack full of proteins.

This is the stuff we want to get out of the cell.

Now, how does it know what directions to go?  If I told it, “Turn around,” would it be able to?

It can't because the foot only fits in one direction, going one way.

So the grooves are preset to go in one particular direction?

Yes.  Yes.

And then, how many of these roads are being built every, you know, seconds?

Oh, thousands.  I mean, there are thousands of these fibers.  About tens of thousands in every cell.  And also that's...

In your cell, right now...

Right now.

...as you're looking, all the time?

Right.  Right.  And they're being built.  And they're being broken down.

And this is typical cell behavior.  Nothing special.  There's the cargo being dumped out of the cell.  So there you are sitting, watching this on TV, and you're thinking, “Well, I'm pretty much doing nothing.”  But your 72 trillion cells are a riot of magical, elegant, exquisitely organized activity in you right now.  Robert Krulwich, ABC News, New York

LISTENING REVIEW (15/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY15: AIRLINE MERGERS

In other news.  A lot of airlines these days are (1. 합병 충동을 느끼다: feeling the urge to merge).  United wants Continental, US Airways wants Delta, AirTran wants Midwest.  There's no indication yet that any of these deals may (2. 결실을 맺다: come to fruition).  Indeed there are (3. 한 건 한 건 마다 상당한 장애물: considerable obstacles to each one).  But it is indication that many airlines feel they need to (4. 합병을 통해 비용을 절감하다: combine to cut costs).  But this means to the industry and, more importantly, to (5. 항공편을 이용하는 모든 사람: everyone who flies), here's ABC’s Lisa Stark.  Lisa?

Well Charlie, airline analysts say this could be the start of (6. 합병 열기: a merger feeding frenzy).  All the airlines are talking and no one wants to (7. 특이한 사람으로 튀다: be the odd man out) if (8. 합병이 본격적으로 시작되다: the deal making begins in earnest).

The talks between United and Continental are characterized as (9. 본격적인 협상 이전 단계: very preliminary).  But analysts say, (10. 서류상으로는: on paper), combining the two makes sense.  Continental is big in the east, Europe and Latin America.  United in the west and Asia.  This could create the world's largest airline, and that could lead (11. 합병 열풍: to merger mania).

Airlines don't wanna be left behind.  Because if size and scope matters in the airline industry, it's a very, very, it's a key factor.

Analysts say there's little doubt who the winners are in these mergers.

With a big merger, the consumer and the employees always (12. 타격을 입다: take a hit).  Employees in particular always (13. 결국 불리한 쪽에 서다: end up on the short end of it) and (14. 협상을 타결한 사람들: the people who put the deal together), you know, they're buying condos down in Florida.

As for consumers already packed on to planes...

I think a merger probably would (15. 요금 구조에 악영향을 미치다: hurt the fare structure) and make it more expensive for consumers.

That could be true in the short run.  But the combined airlines would have (16. 항로를 포기하다: to give up routes) to win government approval.  Guess who's eager to nab them?  (17. 저가 항공 쪽의 큰 항공사: Low cost giant) Southwest and JetBlue.

If anything else, having those two airlines interested in (18. 합병의 전리품: the spoils of a merger) tells you right now that not all things are gonna be higher fares.

So all of the airlines are plotting their moves.  It's not just United and Continental in play.  There's talk that American and Northwest could combine.  And US Airways recently (19. Delta사에 대한 적대적 인수 합병을 시도하다: made a hostile bid for Delta).

We are not interested at all with a US Air hostile takeover.

Delta employees today made their feelings quite clear.  But many say, in order to compete, mergers are inevitable.

In terms of the global airline industry, I think the airlines are gonna have to get together and merge.

The question is, when these (20. 기업 합병: corporate marriages) might take place and who could end up together?  Charlie, that is still very much unknown. Lisa Stark reporting on the airlines from Washington, or just outside Washington tonight.

LISTENING REVIEW (16/16) JAN, 2007

                                                                                                INSTRUCTOR KIM SOO-YEON

STORY16: DRUGS AND DEPRESSION

We take “A Closer Look,” tonight, at (1. 항우울제: antidepressant drugs).  There's a real debate over the risks as opposed to the benefits of such drugs and (2. 뜨거운 논쟁이 진행되다: that debate boiled over) in Washington today.  Angry relatives of (3. 자살한 사람들: suicide victims) were (4. 일부가 증인으로 청문회에 출두하다: among the witnesses at a hearing) on (5. 경고 문구: warning labels).  Last year, almost 190 million (6. 항우울제에 대한 처방전 약을 타가다: prescriptions for antidepressants were filled).  The drugs have labels warning they can (7. 자살 충동을 유발하다: lead to suicidal thoughts) and behavior among children and adolescents.  Today the FDA proposed expanding the labels to young adults.  Here is ABC’s John McKenzie.

The drugs are among the most popular in the country.  Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft.  And debate about the drugs is passionate.

I began (8. 항우울제를 복용하다: taking antidepressants) at the age of 17 in 1993.  Over the next several months, (9. 음울함이 걷히다: clouds lifted), my (10. 급작성 panic: panic attacks) drifted away.  I began to feel hope.

Mary Ellen Winter's daughter had a very different experience.  She was prescribed an antidepressant (11. 불면증을 치료하다: to treat insomnia).

She was told she would feel better in two weeks.  Beth never had two weeks.  On the seventh day after taking Paxil, I arrived home from work and walked up my stairs and saw my beautiful daughter (12. 계단에 목을 매다: hanging from a staircase).

Suzanne Gonzalez blames the antidepressant Paxil and the FDA advisers for the death of her 40-year-old husband.

Four pills into Paxil, he woke up within an hour and shot himself in the head.  He did this less than 10 feet from where my son was sleeping.  I hold you all responsible for his death and I always will.

Documents released today show anti-depressants do produce an increased but short-term risk for suicidal thoughts and behavior among people 18 to 25.  The increased risk could mean (13. 환자 1천 명 당 4명 증가: four additional cases for every 1,000 patients) (14. 항우울제를 복용하는: on antidepressants).

But several psychiatrists said today (15. 그 약의 득이 실보다 훨씬 크다: the benefits of the drugs far outweigh the risks), that the medications are usually essential in treating depression.

Any additional (16. 경고 문구: black box warning) runs the risk of making the effective treatments less available for many depressed patients.

For more patients, like Sheri Walton.

Antidepressant medications saved me.  Along with therapy, medication gave me back my life.

What's key, said psychiatrists, is that anyone taking an antidepressant needs to be carefully monitored, especially in the first few weeks and months of treatment.  John McKenzie, ABC News, New York.

[Lina KY Jung]

혹시...이 듣기 자료도 mp3 파일이 있나요? 있는데 제가 못찾는걸까요? ^^;;;

[Jina]

원래 선생님께서 학원홈피 음성자료실에 올려놓으시는데.... 저도 찾아보니까 아직 없더라구요..

[charliek]

학원 홈피 통대 음성자료실에 올라있습니다. ^^