스크랩 이슬람교의 교리들중 반드시 알아야 할 교리- 타키야

[하토브]

이슬람교의 교리들중 반드시 알아야 할 교리- 타키야

이슬람교에서 비무슬림들을 살육하라( 수라 9:5)

비무슬림들을 십자가에 못박으라 또는 그들의 손발들을 절단하라( 수라 5:33)

이슬람교를 떠나는 자는 반드시 죽이라(수라 4:89)

아내를 둘 셋 넷까지 두라(수라 4:3) 아내를 가볍게 구타하라(수라 4:34)

등의 교리들도 기억해야 합니다만, 

이 타키야라는 교리는 아주 중요하며 반드시 기억해두어야 합니다.

한마디로 이 타키야는 중요한 목적을 위해서는 

거짓말을 해도 좋다는 것입니다.

그 중요한 목적이란 알라라고 불리우는 악마를 위하는 것이며 

그 악마 알라를 위해서라면 거짓말을 해도 좋다는 뜻입니다.

이슬람은 살인 강간 약탈 거짓말 명예살인, 여성학대 여성 노예화, 아동학대

등의 온갖 악행을 용인하거나 가르치며 모든 도덕심을 없애버립니다. 

그 텅빈 머리에 대신 알라를 집어넣는 것입니다.

이것을 뒷받침하는 코란 구절들은 엄청 많습니다

수라 2:225, 3:28, 3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 66:2

하딧 : 비무슬림들을 격파하기 위하여, 또한 자기들을 보호하기 위하여 

비무슬림들에게 거짓말할수 있다

부카리 : 84:64-65 원수를 격파하기 위하여 원수를 속일수 있다. 

원수를 속이기 위하여 거짓말할수 있다. 원수란 무슬림들이 아닌 

모든 비무슬림들이다(4:101)

샤히 부카리 49:857

사람들 사이에 평화를 만들기 위해, 좋은 정보나 좋은 일을 만들어내는

것은 거짓말이 아니다.

타키야 외에도 거짓말하는 기법들이 이슬람에서는 다양하며 

그것은 이슬람에서 허용됩니다

Kitman – 어떤 사실을 생략함으로서 속이는 수법

Tawriya – 어떤 사실과 다른 인상을 불러넣어주는 행동- 

예를들면 9.11 테러범들이 이슬람 근본주의자들이 아닌 것처럼

 보이게 하기 위해 술집에서 술마시고 놀았던 행동

Muruna - 'Blending in' by setting aside some

 practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.
이슬람교의 보다 더 중요한 목적을 위해서 이슬람교의 사소한 

교리를 포기하고 버리는 행동

이슬람교도들이 하는 말은 절대로 그대로

믿어서는 안됩니다.

이런 타키야, 무루나 때문에 이슬람국가들도 서로 못믿으며, 무슬림들도 

서로 못믿습니다. 그들은 거짓말에 능숙해있고 갖가지 변명을 늘어놓기 

때문입니다. 시아파와 수니파는 서로에게 원수이며, 서로 거짓말할수 

있습니다. 또 같은 파라 할지라도, 누가 정통이며 순수한지 모르므로

서로 속일수 있으며 원수간들입니다.

그런 까닭에 지구상에 57개 이슬람국가들이 있지만 그들 나라들중 평화와 

번영과 민주주의와 자유를 누리는 나라는 하나도 없으며, 무슬림 난민들도

이슬람 국가들로는 들어가고 싶어하지 않습니다.

그러면서도 비무슬림국가들에 들어와서 이슬람교리를 붙들고 지키겠다고 

고집하는 이유는 그들의 머리가 이슬람이라는 광견병에 걸려있기 때문으로 

밖에 이해할수 없습니다.

이슬람은 도덕심을 완전히 씻어낸 다음 알라라는 마귀에 충성하도록하는

광견병이며 세계에 퍼지는 염병입니다.

2018. 9. 4 엘리야후

 Taqqiya

Quran

Quran (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

Quran (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves" against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim may appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel friendly.

Quran (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths is with pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.  (The next verse refers only to those who have a personal agreement with Muhammad as individuals - see Ibn Kathir vol 4, p 49)

Quran (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths..."

Quran (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

Quran (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts"

Quran (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.

Hadith and Sira

Sahih Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'" The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed companions by Muhammad's men after they were "guaranteed" safe passage (see Additional Notes below).

Sahih Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Sahih Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirm‎s that lying is permitted in order to deceive an "enemy."  The Quran defines the 'enemy' as "disbelievers" (4:101). 

Sahih Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Sahih Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered.

From Islamic Law:

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) - "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression...  (See the Permissible Lying section on the Sharia page for more)

"One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie."

Notes

The Hadith makes it clear that Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them or protect themselves. There are several forms:

Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim identity.  (This is a Shiite term).

Kitman - Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief." 

Tawriya - Intentionally creating a false impression.

Muruna - 'Blending in' by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.

Though not called taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans (known as Hudaibiya) which allowed him access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover. The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the treaty two years later. Some of the people in the city who had trusted him at his word were executed. 

Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to trick his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves to slaughter by pretending to seek peace. This happened in the case of Ka'b bin al-Ashraf (as previously noted) and later against Usayr ibn Zarim, a surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe, which had been evicted from their home in Medina by the Muslims.

At the time, Usayr ibn Zarim was attempting to gather an armed force against the Muslims from among a tribe allied with the Quraish (against which Muhammad had already declared war). Muhammad's "emissaries" went to ibn Zarim and persuaded him to leave his safe haven on the pretext of meeting with the prophet of Islam in Medina to discuss peace. Once vulnerable, the leader and his thirty companions were massacred by the Muslims with ease, probably because they were unarmed - having been given a guarantee of safe passage (Ibn Ishaq 981, Ibn Kathir v.4 p.300).

Such was the reputation of early Muslims for lying and killing that even those who "accepted Islam" did not feel entirely safe. Consider the fate of the Jadhima. When Muslim "missionaries" approached their tribe, one of the members insisted that they would be slaughtered even though they had already "converted" to Islam (to avoid just such a demise). However, the others believed they could trust the Muslim leader's promise that they would not be harmed if they simply offered no resistance. (After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms, the unarmed men of the tribe were tied up and beheaded by the missionaries - Ibn Ishaq 834 & 837).

Today's apologists often rationalize Muhammad's murder of poets and others who criticized him at Medina by falsely claiming that they broke a treaty with their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.

Leaders in the Arab world sometimes say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic.  Palestinian leaders routinely tell Westerners about their desire for peace with Israel, even as they whip Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.  Yassir Arafat even referenced "Hudaibiya" - an admission to conning guillible non-Muslims.

The 9/11 hijackers practiced deception by going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well that John Walsh, the host of a popular American television show, claimed well after the fact that their bar trips were evidence of 'hypocrisy.'

The transmission from Flight 93 records the hijackers telling their doomed passengers that there is "a bomb on board" but that everyone will "be safe" as long as "their demands are met." Obviously none of this was true, but these men, who were so intensely devoted to Islam that they were willing to "slay and be slain for the cause of Allah" (as the Quran puts it) saw nothing wrong with employing taqiyya to facilitate their mission of mass murder.

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it "has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization."  In fact, it was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and has bankrolled Hamas.  At least nine founders or board members of ISNA have been accused by prosecutors of supporting terrorism. 

The notorious Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) is so well known for shamelessly lying about its ties to terror and extremism that books have been written on the subject.  They take seriously the part of Sharia  that says "it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory".  The goal being the ascendency of Islam (and Sharia itself) on the American landscape. 

In 2007, CAIR's Ibrahim Hooper published an op-ed with a fabricated story about Muhammad that portrayed him as a forgiving man:

There was a lady who threw garbage in the path of the prophet on a daily basis. One day, she didn‘t do it. The prophet went to inquire about her health, because he thought she might be sick. This lady ended up converting to Islam. So, that‘s how you respond to people who attack you, with forgiveness and with kindness.

Hooper is not ignorant, of course, and knew what he was doing.  After getting caught, he changed the wording slightly to say that it is a tradition "Muslims are taught," but he continues to promote the story without qualifying it as untrue - thus causing others to unwittingly repeat a lie.

Prior to engineering several deadly terror plots, such as the Fort Hood massacre and the attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner, American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was regularly sought out by NPR, PBS and even government leaders to expound on the peaceful nature of Islam. 

In 2013, a scholar at the prestigious al-Azhar university decreed that Muslims may wear the cross in order to deceive Christians into thinking they are friendly.  He cited 3:28 which says not to be friends with non-Muslims unless it is a way of "guarding" yourself against them.

"Hiding faith" can mean deceiving others about Islam in order to make it appear more attractive.  For example, a prominent Muslim activist in the United States, Linda Sarsour, bills herself as a "progressive" and says that gays, women and religious minorities need not worry about Sharia being imposed.  She even says that money is lent free of charge under Islamic law (more about that here).   

The Quran says in several places that Allah is the best at deceiving people.  

The near absence of Quranic verses that encourage truthfulness is somewhat surprising, given that many Muslims are convinced their religion teaches honesty. In fact, many Muslims are honest because of this. But when lying is addressed in the Quran, it is nearly always in reference to the "lies against Allah" - referring to the Jews and Christians who rejected Muhammad's claim to being a prophet.

Finally, the circumstances by which Muhammad allowed a believer to lie to a non-spouse are limited to those that either advance the cause of Islam or enable a Muslim to avoid harm to his well-being (and presumably that of other Muslims as well).  Although this should be kept very much in mind when dealing with matters of global security, such as Iran's nuclear intentions, it is not grounds for assuming that the Muslim one might personally encounter on the street or in the workplace is any less honest than anyone else.


Additional Reading: 
Taqiyya: TROP's Response to the Apologists
Taqiyya about Taqiyya (Raymond Ibrahim)
Knowing the Four Forms of Lying
Muruna: Violating Sharia to Fool the West

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx

[엘리야후]

https://www.facebook.com/aynazcyrus/videos/10208594928339167/