True or False in the Air -7

[124기김은희]

s.a1.jpg

541.80KB

s.a2.jpg

154.17KB

s.a3.jpg

32.55KB

s.a4.jpg

78.34KB

Special Codes for Dogs in the Cabin


 It is getting easier to see dogs in the cabin than ever, and I found myself confused with some SHR codes for those who travelling with dogs and the differences among them. I believe so
me of crew, maybe a lot, might have the same trouble that I have.
 
 Are you able to tell the difference between SVAN and ESAN? I can tell the difference of the full name of them, but I do not know how they are exactly different or how to distinguish one from the other.
 
 SVAN is the SHR code for a service animal. A service animal is limited to a dog that is trained to perform tasks for an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. Tasks performed by a service animal can be the following: pulling a wheelchair, retrieving dropped items, alerting a person to a sound, reminding a person to take medication, or pressing an elevator button. There are no size limit and no need of cage in the cabin, but they have to stay at their handler’s feet with a harness or a leash. Surprisingly, there are also differences in these service animals. While some of them like Seeing Eye Dog, Hearing Dog, or Physical Service Dog can be flown with their handlers on every flight which Asiana airlines operates,
others can be flown in the cabin on U.S.A flights only. So I don’t want you to be surprised if you find the SVAN code on any other non-U.S.A flights.
 
 ESAN, on the other hand, is the code for an emotional support animal. These emotional support animals are not considered as service animals. They provide companionship, relieve loneliness, and sometimes help with depression, anxiety, and certain phobias, but do not have special training to work to assist people with disabilities. As their work is not directly related to the individual’s disability, the airline regulation for them is mostly the same as pets’. But they can stay out of cages as long as they are wearing a harness or a leash, and are allowed on U.S.A flights only.
 
 I did my utmost to deliver this information about SVAN and ESAN as simple as possible. Nevertheless, it can be something quite tricky and confusing when you encounter these codes on the passenger list. Once you finish reading this article, I want you to look up the recent notices about our company’s regulations of SVAN and ESAN for your further flights.
 
 
 
 
psychiatric 정신의학의, 정신병의
retrieve 되찾아오다
leash 개를 매는 줄
companionship 동지애, 우정

 

[나라사랑]

수정사항
1. 제목 부탁드립니다.
2. 마지막 단락 마지막에 essay 라고 하기에 적절하지 않아서 article 이나 writing 같이 좀 더 캐주얼한 의미의 단어로 변경부탁드립니다.
정말 유용한 정보 감사합니다!!!

[황선영(215)]

저는 수정사항 없습니다:)
유용한 글 감사합니다 선배님~!

[김다솜(193)]

1. 두분째단락 3번째 문장 retrieving 단어처리 부탁드립니다!
2. 두번째단락 3번째 문장 leash 도 단어처리 부탁드려요 선배님-!

늘 헷갈렸는데,,🥹 비행때 많은 도움이 될것 같아요 선배님:)) 수고많으셨습니다!!!

[124기김은희]

수정완료입니다-----‐-------------------------

[정예인(207)]

선배님,, 안그래도 지난번에 뉴욕비행 앞두고 SVAN/ESAN 관련된 공지글에 영어로 나와있는 설명이 없어서 구글링 했던 기억이 납니다ㅠㅠ 써주신 글 꼭 캡쳐해두고 비행할때 유용하게 사용하겠습니다 감사합니다!!! 수고많으셨습니다🥰🧡

[나라사랑]

수정사항
1. 세번째 단락 세번째 줄 Tasks 가 다른 폰트로 되어있는 데 통일 부탁드립니다.
2. 세번째 단락 아래서 둘째줄 others 가 무엇일까요..? 바로 위에서 언급한 애들 뺀 나머지들이라는 의미라면 the others 로 해야 할 것 같습니다만 그 문장의미를 알고 싶습니다.
3. 마지막 단락 essay 단어 교체 부탁드립니다.

[124기김은희]

1. 저한테는 같은 폰트로 보이는데 컴퓨터로 다시 확인후 수정하겠습니다!
2. others가 위에 언급한 아이들처럼 스페셜 트레이닝을 받은 특수서비스견들을 제외한 다른 아이들을 말하는게 맞지만 제가 예시로 모두 언급하지 않은 관계로 저거 빼고 나머지 모두라고 하기에는 무리가 있어서 the others를 쓰지않고 others로 작성하였습니다.
3. 본문에는 수정되었는데 파일에서 안되어있었습니다. 수정완료 하였습니다!