6. Continuation of Illegal Torts for Ruining Country

[박상구현덕]

Constitutional Institutions that Deceived the People
Destroyed Constitutional Order of the Republic of Korea
The Starting Point and Destination of the Illegal
Impeachment of Our President
The National Report Dissecting the Bare Face of




The Culprit of Illegal Impeachment
Are they our Country's Constitutional Institutions?










Why did the Republic of Korea
Commit Illegal Impeachment?






This book is about the Illegal Impeachment of President Park, GeunHye of the Republic of Korea to protect the constitutional order of the Republic of Korea for truth and the definition of the Impeachment Nullification focusing on the various illegal disposition of the constitutional institutions by notifying the public widely that the illegal impeachment was extremely inappropriate and absurd.






The Patriotic Constitutional Guard
of the Republic of Korea

.

.


Why did the Republic of Korea Commit Illegal Impeachment?


CONTENTS
          
1. Report on the Illegal Impeachment and Its Nullity to the Public 


2. Justice and Truth must NOT be Neglected! 


3. Living People's Sovereign Guard in the Republic of Korea's Constitutional Suicide 


4. Substantial Sovereignty of the People by the Struggle 


5. President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated. 


6. Continuation of Illegal Torts for Ruining Country 


7. Illegal Tyranny of Prosecutors and Special Prosecutors 

6. Continuation of Illegal Torts for Ruining Country

There is no doubt that the act of expelling an incumbent president is a matter to be judged by a high-level legal standard of whether or not she violates the Constitution and the law based on clear facts.

It is becoming clearer as time goes by that the impeachment of President Park, GeunHye was the rush by a “witch-hunting public opinion trial,” leaving behind the factual investigation itself.

At that time, the impeachment leaders said, “In November 2016, the approval rating for President Park fell to an unprecedented low of four to five percent for three weeks in a row.” They criticized President Park, GeunHye and said that the will of the people was clear for her not to hold the office of president any longer. This was revealed and emphasized with the left false media. It was only decided by the manipulation of the left rigged polls, which were not based on the will of the entire people.

On March 10, 2017, the hearing period was only 92 days until the constitutional court's decision of illegal impeachment was reached. According to the constitutional court Act, the result is to be pronounced within 180 days of the receipt of the resolution of prosecution.

At that time, it is clear that the sentence was hasted with unusual actions such as the pressure from the opposition. The pronunciation of the deadline for sentence was made in public as before March 10, 2017 for the president of the constitutional court, Park HanCheol who retired during the impeachment trial period.

It is also true that the constitutional court carried out the trial four times a week while receiving the investigation results containing only the “truckful of suspicion (suspicion or suspected)” from the prosecution and the special prosecutors, and as a result, the president's delegation was not able to properly prepare for pleading.

The object of contention between the president's delegation and the National Assembly's prosecution committee was more about the factual relationship that was weak from the prosecution stage, instead of the legal principle. The fact that the constitutional court's impeachment trial was carried out in parallel can only be seen as evidence of “rapid impeachment” as the special prosecutor's investigation was ongoing.

On December 27, 2016, it is controversial that Chief Judge Kang IlWon intervened under the pretext of resolving issues, condensing the nine promiscuous indictment reasons into four for the National Assembly prosecution committee. The fact that he actually supported the revision of the impeachment proceedings was inevitably a controversy for the same purpose.

As the expression‎‎ “Governing Intervention” states, what kind of interests did President Park have or whether she took even a single penny of personal profit was not proven in the impeachment proceedings of the National Assembly, the impeachment trial of the constitutional court and the criminal trial. Thus, it adds weight to the interpretation of pre-determined impeachment with impure intentions.

Attempts by the Supreme Court to increase the amount of direct and indirect bribery charges in a separate case continued, however, it is also true that criticism has been raised as it has escaped from the essence. Compared to the cases in which living power relatives were subjected to judicial treatment for misconduct such as large sums of money under the administrations of several previous presidents, President Park's excuse of “economic community” was unprecedented. The grounds for impeachment by making it up to this point are indeed scarce. Even the impeachment trial of President Park did not apply the Constitution and laws, however, rumors flowed as part of a public opinion in the kangaroo court trial.

When the judiciary or the Korean people do not realize the rule of law based on the Constitution and the law, even though the circumstances, are so unjust and illegal, they will face the end of country and are mobilized for the mad candlelight vigil against the people's sovereignty. We will have no choice but to receive the punishment in the common name of a lost nation paying the high price for being deceived by the communist propaganda.

In the name of the candlelight revolution, the left incited the people to make a fundamentally invalid decision to remove President Park, and the law was decided on the illegal basis against the President.

The constitutional court also revised the content and procedural justice of the National Assembly's dismissal for the impeachment trial, as it was also not legal for the impeachment proceeding. They did not examine in detail the legal definitions and truths necessary for the submission of the amendment, ignoring the provisions of the Constitution and laws necessary for the amendment.

However, the whole world absolutely believed in the decision made by the constitutional court, which is said to be the best legal knowledge institution in Korea. The constitutional judges took advantage of the jurisdiction for usurping national politics.

Because it is a constitutional trial without a system of retrial or appeal, many people were deceived by the propaganda and the false left media, ignoring that it was impeachment that put shackles on our own Constitution and suppressed us as citizens of the Republic of Korea; the verdict fooled us.

We don't understand why the 30,000 lawyers who tried in court did not try the implementation of the judicial remedial method though there were some disagreements in the legal and academic circles. It is questionable whether they did not know how, or whether they were afraid of power though they knew. That is why we, the non-legalists are still fighting on their behalf.

The people of the Republic of Korea and the state power were unaware of the clearly illegal abuse of power committed by the constitutional judges in the constitutional court at that time, as the serious mistake in the national recognition of the law. In fact, it is even the serious illegal act of the constitutional trial decision.

In the end, the presidential election was held on May 9, 2017 due to the illegal impeachment proceedings by the National Assembly’s illegal amendment and the constitutional court's unlawful impeachment decision. Fake Moon regime without authority but the candlelight rebellious trial that exploited the country was established in 2017.

However, the anti-constitutional and anti-legal Moon cannot be washed out as a legitimate “President elected by the people” against the laws of the Republic of Korea. As he could not be washed down like that, people's resistance continues in the sixth year of illegal impeachment over constitutional revision with more than 40 endless litigation struggles

For the constitutional judges involved in the trial of illegal impeachment at the time of the constitutional court in this way, they constituted a crime of the abuse of power as public officials under Article 123 of the Criminal Act and obstruction of the exercise of their right, and furthermore, they violated the Constitution and laws in the execution of their duties under Article 65 of the Constitution. It would be considered a felony subject for impeachment.

In this way, they violated the Constitution of the State under the Criminal Act (Article 91). Disruption of the national Constitution means ➀destroying the functions of the Constitution or laws without following the procedures stipulated in the Constitution or laws. ➁It is defined as the overthrow of a state institution established by the Constitution or the impossibility of the exercise of its power by coercion.

It is clear from their acts and norms that the eight constitutional judges involved in the illegal impeachment of President Park made it impossible to exercise the power of the President. They sought to overthrow the free Korean democratic system by exposing the functions of the Constitution and laws through their illegal acts.

In the case that caused civil rebellion due to their violation of the national constitution, “Whether or not there is a real risk of a rebellion conspiracy depends on the specificity of the contents of the agreement, the proximity to the planned execution time, the number of parties to the agreement and the relationship between the parties to the agreement, the strength of the agreement, the social situation at the time of the agreement, whether the agreement was prepared in advance, and whether there was a follow-up action to the agreement should be judged by considering comprehensively[Refer to the decision of the Supreme Court on January 22, 2015 by the 2014 도(Do) 10978 All-in-One Council]

#Report #Illegal #Impeachment #Nullity #Public #korea #President #seoul #Park-GeunHye #war #constitution #law #publish #book
#litigation #ceo #assembly #anniversary #gratitude #devote #Design #person #legal #nullification #institution #litigation #principle #justice
#struggle #people #commander #democracy #economic #atom #plaintiff # discuss #endless #debate #rights #examin #fight #sports #coronavirus #civil #ngo #emergency #disaster #relief #funds #judgment #accordance #admin #memory #exercise #natural